/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/11/19/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

andresmujicahi!02:11
andresmujicahow should i mark a bug aginst launchpad??02:11
jjesseandresmujica: what type of bug?02:11
jjessethat is where did you find the bug?02:12
jjesseyou assign it to the correct project in launchpad02:12
andresmujicabug #29812302:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 298123 in firefox-3.0 "Inconsistent experience logging onto Launchpad site ..." [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29812302:14
jjessehrmm file that against launchpad itself then as the projet02:15
andresmujicayeap .. but how i filed that against launchpad... ?02:15
jjessedo you have access to the affects project link?02:16
jjessehrm thats not right hold on02:16
andresmujicaand choose another project??02:17
jjessei think so hold on02:17
andresmujicaok..02:17
jjesseyes let me get out of the bug so nothing wierd goes on02:18
jjessego for it02:18
andresmujicaok! perfect thanks! i wasn`t sure how to do it..02:21
jjessecool glad i could help out02:21
andresmujica:)02:22
dholbachgood morning05:42
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
=== jmarsden_ is now known as jmarsden
=== pedro__ is now known as pedro_
=== thekorn__ is now known as thekorn
awsoonn1mornin' all13:32
=== LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox
azimoutam i right to think that suspend/resume issues should be assigned to the acpi-support source package?14:27
persiaMight be pm-utils, or gnome-power-manager, or any of several other things though.14:31
persiaEven linux for some issues.14:31
azimoutthanx, persia...14:35
azimoutit might be a good idea to add a related paragraph in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage14:35
persiaazimout, Except I really don't understand how all the pieces interact, which makes me a poor candidate to write that paragraph.14:36
azimouti see. well, i'll write a short piece there (which is better than nothing) and have you guys take a look and change/add anything you want14:37
azimoutdone! go have a look, please?14:42
BUGabundo1hya asac14:51
BUGabundo1is anybody looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase-runtime/+bug/299907 ?14:53
ubottuLaunchpad bug 299907 in kdebase-runtime "kdebase-runtime-data FTBS" [Undecided,New]14:53
persiaBUGabundo1, Likely actively, in preparation for Alpha 1.15:02
persiaBUGabundo1, I suspect they don't know about that bug though, and won't close it whilst fixing it.15:02
persiaBUGabundo1, Since it's your bug, I'd recommend marking it invalid, as it's quite likely to be fixed before it is triaged.15:02
BUGabundo1I'll keep an eye on it persia15:05
BUGabundo1if it gets fixed ill close if, of course15:05
persiaBUGabundo1, Works.  Have you checked the build queue to see if it's already been resubmitted?15:06
BUGabundo1I haven'ti get lost there15:06
BUGabundo1lol15:06
BUGabundo1let me see if I find it15:06
BUGabundo1got side tracked trying to guess the number of members of LP teams15:07
BUGabundo1lol15:07
persiahttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+builds15:07
BUGabundo1got it on FF awesome bar15:08
BUGabundo1No matching builds.15:08
BUGabundo1lpia faild and 64 was a success15:09
BUGabundo1https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase-runtime/4:4.1.73-0ubuntu1/+build/78753715:09
persiaRight.  I seem to remember large chunks of KDE being broken on lpia.15:10
BUGabundo1but im on 64 bits15:11
BUGabundo1Errors were encountered while processing:15:11
BUGabundo1 /var/cache/apt/archives/kdebase-runtime-data_4%3a4.1.73-0ubuntu1_all.deb15:11
BUGabundo1E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)15:11
LimCorehi16:40
LimCorepassword storage seems to really fail on 8.10 and also 8.04 sometimes.  Lots of passwords are not stored, are lost, or need re-entering (also some are not stared-out *** while entering)16:41
LimCorehow to improve this really bad situation16:41
LimCoreI report bugs, but so far even verifing them takes ages16:41
jjesse_LimCore: you could post to a fourm or a user mailing list asking people for verification of the bug?16:42
LimCorefor example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/29997816:49
ubottuError: This bug is private16:49
LimCoreI guess for most bugs, it would take 20% time to setup devel tools, 70% time to get into code of given application and learn all needed libs/tools/code practise for given application, 5% for bug managment, and last 5% would be the actuall bug16:50
yuriyLimCore: at least for the case of bug 299978, it sounds like an upstream bug, so could you file it at bugs.kde.org and link it in the lp report please?17:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 299978 in kdepim "[kmail 4.1.2-0ubuntu2] shows "Exporting key..." window on Attach My Public Key" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29997817:16
LimCoreare we sure it's not an addition by Ubuntu?  hmm I guess I should get a gentoo or something to build upstream svn versions to confirm :/17:20
yuriypatches.ubuntu.com shows just one kubuntu patch to kdepim17:24
greg-gLaunchpad broke 300,000 bugs18:14
james_wlaunchpad broke?18:16
bdmurrayjames_w: I'd be curious to know how many of those packages have upstream projects / bug trackers18:17
james_wmight be possible to do with launchpadlib18:17
james_whmm, but would require them putting source packages in the API first18:17
bdmurraythere's always something ;)18:18
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
=== LimCore_ is now known as LimCore
savvasthe bugs tags needs-upstream-sync upstream are really kubuntu specific?22:14
savvas* 'needs-upstream-sync' and 'upstream'22:14
bdrung_ping bdmurray22:26
savvasbdrung_: me?22:32
bdmurraybdrung_: hello22:33
bdrung_savvas: no22:34
savvasok :)22:34
bdrung_bdmurray: my membership in ubuntu-bugcontrol expires. can you extend it?22:35
savvasShould I add any bug tags for a bug that was fixed upstream? needs-devrelease-testing ?22:35
bdrung_savvas: do you have the upstream bugreport linked?22:36
savvasyes bdrung_22:37
savvashttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56106822:37
ubottuGnome bug 561068 in gparted ""Apply" button not visible in default window size in some translations" [Minor,Resolved: fixed]22:37
savvas(Unfortunately launchpad is down at the moment)22:38
bdmurraybdrung_: I'll look when lp comes back22:39
bdrung_bdmurray: thx.22:39
rrittenhouseah ok LP is out. Just making sure it wasn't me.22:46
angusthefuzzits coming back at 23.59 UTC/6:59pm EST22:46
rrittenhousecool. thx22:47
angusthefuzzI think i will spend the time reading the debugging instructions for X ;-)22:47
rrittenhouseI was looking to try and get my 5 in today :D Theres always later22:48
tcolelaunchpad needs a fail whale22:49
angusthefuzzya, same here, i figured I would prep, so I can race out of the gate when the site came back22:49
tcolenot that it would need it often22:49
rrittenhousehaha22:49
angusthefuzztcole: you can file a report when lp comes back22:50
bdrung_lp is down due to maintaince22:51
angusthefuzzlp is back for all those waiting for an announcement :-)23:45
bdmurrayangusthefuzz: thanks!23:48
angusthefuzzbdmurray: youre welcome, enjoy v2.1.11, hehe23:49
bdrung_v2.1.11 has not big new features23:49
angusthefuzzbdrung_: yeah, thats why its funny23:50
tcolemaybe a free two-hour coffee break is a feature23:50
bdrung_for me its going to bed early ;)23:51
angusthefuzztcole: what we really need is two-hours where we have access but no more bugs can be submitted23:51
tcolegood point!23:51
tcoleI wonder if there will be a spike in bug reports now that LP has reopened23:52
tcoleor if people just don't report bugs23:52
tcole(I imagine it's somewhere in-between)23:52
bdrung_i am wainting for bug #125103 it was target to fix it with v2.1.1123:52
ubottuLaunchpad bug 125103 in soyuz "ppa archives are not signed" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12510323:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!