=== Pici` is now known as Pici [04:33] erm. why is Bug 137526 private? [04:33] Bug 137526 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/137526 is private [04:33] maybe I have bugs mixed up, though...since I can't really tell anymore :P [04:41] Ryan52: did you just submit it through apport? [04:42] oh, no, was it just submitted. [04:42] if so, then my mistake. I thought it was a bug that was already there that just became private. [04:42] no [04:42] I can see it [04:43] okay. [04:43] I believe it's someone doing stuff wrong [04:43] It doesn't look private [04:43] but I am relucatant to open it up [04:43] I'm going to alert the launchpad folks to the user, as it is the second time I have seen odd behaviour [04:44] okay, thanks. [04:44] I think that they are testing the launchpad API and not being sensible about it [04:46] Ryan52: thanks for bringing it up === asac_ is now known as asac [05:53] is bug 300914 from the same guy that has been spamming reports recently? [05:53] Bug 300914 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/300914 is private [05:53] nellery: probably. they haven't actually managed to properly deactivate the account. [05:53] Hobbsee: so best to mark them all invalid? [05:54] nellery: so far, people are hoping that the LOSAs are going tobe able to do a mass revert. [05:55] Hobbsee: okay === doko_ is now known as doko [08:04] debian bug #445204 [08:04] Debian bug 445204 in rss-glx "rss-glx: screensavers consume 100% CPU" [Normal,Closed] http://bugs.debian.org/445204 [08:21] man... [08:21] If anyone wanted something to triage, the bugs on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rss-glx would be great! [09:15] can somebody set some bug importances for me? here's my list (bugnumber => suggested_importance_level): 105078 => low, 105082 => low, 276517 => low, 276525 => low, 276529 => medium, 276530 => low, 293240 => medium [09:28] and, can somebody change the status on 276534 to wont fix instead of invalid. I knew there was a won't fix, but not seeing it in the list made me think I was wrong...and now I figured out that there is a status called wont't fix, but I just don't have permission to use it. -_- [09:29] * Ryan52 goes to send an application to join the ubuntu-bugcontrol team, so that he doesn't have to do this again. [09:34] hi [09:34] is bugs.kde.org working for anyone? [09:34] I would like to upstream a new bug I created on LP [09:35] but it seems to fail when creating a new bug [09:53] persia: have a nice vacation! [10:06] okay, sleep time for me... [10:09] guud nite Ryan [10:09] guud nite Ryan52 [10:34] I reported a bug on launchpad, but can anyone help me to classify the package to which it belongs? [10:36] maxriskfactor: what bug is it? [10:36] BUGabundo, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/299188 this is the bug report [10:36] Ubuntu bug 299188 in ubuntu "Laptop hardware buttons for sound doesnt work when there is a drop down menu" [Undecided,New] [10:37] BUGabundo, When I right-click on desktop or have Application or Places drop down box, and then try to change the volume of the speaker via button on my laptop, its fails [10:38] ahh maxriskfactor [10:38] I see what you mean [10:38] I guess that's a metacity bug [10:39] BUGabundo, but I dont have any desktop effects enabled [10:39] if any menu dropdown is choosen lots of other common actions will fail to work [10:39] metacity is the 2D window manager! [10:39] not the compiz one (emerald) [10:39] BUGabundo, I confused between metacity and emerald :P [10:40] but this should not happen, sound +/- should happen in background [10:40] yeah [10:41] so should Firefox allow you to change windows when you have a new link being write on the awsome bar [10:41] its so annoying! [10:41] try that [10:41] FAILED! :( [10:42] reporting now [10:42] please confirme it once I have it up [10:43] BUGabundo, confirming the Firefox problem? [10:43] didn't you just said it failed? [10:43] yes, it didnt allow me to switch windows using Alt+Tab when Awesome bar was showing its awesomeness [10:44] yeah [10:44] BUGabundo, so should i change the package to metacity of that bug? [10:45] * BUGabundo steals maxriskfactor description [10:45] I already did file your bug [10:45] BUGabundo, changed it or made another? [10:46] already there [10:46] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/22199 [10:46] Ubuntu bug 22199 in firefox "Firefox steals Alt-Tab whilst in URL completion drop-down" [Unknown,Confirmed] [10:46] I set the package for your bug [10:46] BUGabundo, Thanks! :) [10:46] hope QA team agrees with me [10:47] I dont have much idea of bugs being fixed [10:47] but will the developers pay attention to such bugs? [10:49] they do, sure1 [10:50] i have only being reproducing bugs and reporting them on launchpad till now [10:51] or assigning packages to bugs which have not been assigned packages, but only for those bugs, which i understand [10:52] you lost me there [10:53] BUGabundo, didnt get what you mean by "You lost me there" [10:53] yeah [10:53] we both got lost with each other talks! [10:54] I also don't get what you are talking about [10:54] BUGabundo, yeah.... were you busy with something else? [10:56] many chanels, email, feeds, and 2 BTS [10:56] lol [11:03] :) [11:12] I have a bug report for mouse tweaks (accsessiblity) [11:12] but i am total newb [11:14] serial, what's the problem? [11:14] eheh maxriskfactor now you are on the other side of things... lol [11:15] when I activate "trigger secoundary click by holding primary button" in accessibility, the mouse goes interlaced transparent and distorted [11:15] BUGabundo, trying my hands too, help this guy out... am also trying [11:16] re-login and reboot fixes the mouse appearance, but the right-click is not working, even though its still checked in the sccessibility GUI [11:16] soory for my newbness, I am using a Macbook Pro and Ibex [11:17] serial, that would furthur complicate the situation.... I think some expert can help you out better [11:17] yeah [11:17] it goes above my head too [11:18] BUGabundo, my mouse config anf mouse accessibility doesnt work.... just says opening... and doesnt open, so i cant reproduce [11:18] aight but is there anywhere I can read how to report a bug properly? I could probably figure out how to log the process from terminal and get some code-dumps from GNOME if I just have a tut [11:20] serial: when you start to create a but [11:21] *bug [11:21] there is a link to a wiki page [11:21] with all the info you need [11:21] serial, Logs can be accessed from System>Administration>System Log [11:22] BUGabundo, what section of Logs should I check for mouse and keyboard logs? [11:22] create a bug? [11:23] no idea [11:23] BUGabundo, I tried Xorg.0.log , nothing shown there [11:23] dmesg? [11:23] serial, https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs [11:23] BUGabundo, trying [11:24] serial, http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs [11:25] thanks, you have been most helpful. [11:25] Have a nice weekend! :) [11:25] serial, :) [11:25] BUGabundo, that's too useless.... looks like basic input devices like keyboard and mouse arnt logged [11:26] syslog? [11:26] eheh [11:26] . /var/log/ should have all you need [11:26] even if you have to grep it [11:26] lOL [11:26] BUGabundo, tried syslog and messages in the beginng and still found nothing [11:27] BUGabundo, I do tail -f /var/log/syslog so that even new updates to log can be shown in rel time [11:27] what are u trying to find? [11:27] yeah that a way to do it [11:27] BUGabundo, when I open mouse settings, it shows Opening Mouse and nothing comes after that [11:28] humm [11:28] that's another stuff [11:28] and I doubt it gets logged [11:28] BUGabundo, I also doubt that it gets logged... those are too basic things, the log would get spammed with such events [11:29] yah [11:30] BUGabundo, had a nice time meeting you. Thanks a lot... [11:30] I need to goto study.... Exams on head [11:30] bye [11:31] bug 243719 [11:31] Launchpad bug 243719 in rss-glx "libopenal-dev is missing the .la file" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/243719 [11:33] hi Hobbsee [11:34] hey BUGabundo [11:34] hummm that lib isn't strange to me [11:34] why is that? [12:41] persia; u ther?? [13:02] I've uploaded a fix for a bug in my PPA, should I change the status of the bug report? [14:01] should bugs about wiki.ubuntu.com be linked to the moin (Ubuntu) source? [14:03] DarkKnight, Yes. [14:03] Flimm: If you've a fixed in a PPA, please also attach a patch to the bug. "Triaged" is the correct status. [14:04] savvas, Depends on the class of bug. If it's a moin bug, probably. If it's something odd specifically about wiki.ubuntu.com, probably not. Dunno where those are really supposed to go though. [14:07] persia: I had reported a bug about wiki.ubuntu.com before to the ubuntu-website project, but it was marked as invalid [14:07] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/moin/+bug/300997 [14:07] Ubuntu bug 300997 in moin "monthcalendar on ubuntu wikis - unattractive brown/red colours" [Undecided,New] [14:07] this is the new one [14:08] it's really specific to the wiki at ubuntu, since someone has changed the hardcoded css colours to that ugly red :P [14:09] Then that's not a bug against moin. [14:09] So that one's invalid too. [14:09] Maybe you need an RT ticket? [14:09] darn [14:09] how we get that? [14:09] *how do [14:10] ah now I see your point, the older one was really relevant to the moinmoin software [14:11] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/moin/+bug/157385 [14:11] Ubuntu bug 157385 in moin "moinmoin - Ubuntu wiki doesn't support links besides http://" [Low,Fix released] [14:12] Right. [14:12] I just have no idea how to report issues with the configuration of moin on wiki.ubuntu.com [14:13] If it's an issue with the software, or the default configuration, the bug belongs there. [14:13] If it's specific to the configuration, it needs to go to the wiki.ubuntu.com admins (and I'm not sure who that would be). [14:14] so it's not for ubuntu-website ? [14:16] you know what's the weird thing? even the loco teams have their wikis registered as projects, the ubuntu website seems to be set as a whole in one project [14:18] you know what? I'll leave them both there, perhaps the problem is in the moinmoin wiki package in ubuntu as well, I can't pinpoint it right now with all that css [14:18] If no-one replies in the next 4-5 days, I'll contact the rt admins as you said and set the bug as invalid [14:21] I thought you said that the ubuntu-website team rejected a bug against the wiki before. [14:21] Maybe there ought be an ubuntu-wiki project? [14:21] Only issue is that most of the reported "bugs" will probably just be edits, which people could just do. [14:25] You are looking to file a bug against wiki.ubuntu.com? [14:28] You could just not file it against a package, you could also probably file it against ubuntu-website or ubuntu-doc [14:29] Rocket2DMn, Yes, but against the configuration: not the software, and not the content. [14:29] ubuntu-doc is a good idea. [14:29] yeah, there really isnt a specific team/package for wiki.ubuntu.com [14:29] ubuntu-doc primilary does help.ubuntu.com and the /community section [14:30] since Canonical hosts the wiki, ubuntu-website might fly,too [14:30] Well, ubuntu-website isn't all canonical folk either. [14:31] But someone on that team probably can redirect to the appropriate procedure for asking the admins to look at the settings. [14:31] ive seen wiki bugs filed against both teams [14:34] why don't they separate the ubuntu-website to the appropriate sections? ubuntu.com-website wiki.ubuntu.com-website help.ubuntu.com-website etc [14:35] savvas, Maybe not enough bugs to make a difference. [14:36] the projects were probably created independently [14:36] you're probably right, but sanity should be first priority :) [14:36] I'll file a bug about that hehe === Afwas__ is now known as Afwas [16:33] what's the prog/package that is used on the live cd installer? [16:33] I want to open an usabilty bug [16:33] ubiquity? [16:34] maybe [16:34] is your problem with the actual installer? [16:35] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/301029 [16:35] Ubuntu bug 301029 in ubiquity "installer shows two password fields without explaing why" [Undecided,New] [16:35] I'm at an install event [16:35] yeah, that's the correct package [16:35] and an user just asked why was there two fields! [16:37] is it clear chrisccoulson [16:37] ? [16:37] BUGabundo, The reason is to verify the input. With only one input field, there's no way to check for typos, but yes, this could perhaps be made more clear. [16:37] yeah, your bug report is clear i think [16:38] In the bug, please share that a user was asking, and as much information about the user's confusion as possible, to better inform the interface designers. [16:42] Could somebody please change bug 274453 from 'Undecided' to 'Wishlist'? [16:42] Launchpad bug 274453 in opencascade "[Feature Request] Support for netgen and gmsh" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274453 [16:59] thanks for the input persia. enjoy your vacations, dude [17:25] Could somebody please change bug 274453 from 'Undecided' to 'Wishlist'? (second request) [17:25] Launchpad bug 274453 in opencascade "[Feature Request] Support for netgen and gmsh" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274453 [17:40] that's fairly disappointing. nobody changed the statuses and importances that I asked for last night, and nobody responded to my request to be a bugcontrol member. [17:40] I really don't get why these things are restricted. [17:40] I mean, if somebody wants to do damage, they're gonna do it with words, not with importances. -_- [17:41] but maybe I'm missing something. [17:49] Ryan52, for every bug reporter his/her bug is of high priority, but it might not be so in the big picture. Hence we have bug control with a good experience of dealing and deciding what's important and how much. [17:50] Ryan52, secondly, if you've submitted a request with 5 of your best triages, then you should get a reply soon. it usually takes some time and doesn't happen within a day or two. [17:51] I understand that taking time, it's just sad that there's nobody here who is nice enough to use their power for me. [17:51] more funny is when you attach a paych and there is absolutely no respond [17:52] well, for anybody who cares: [17:52] 01:15 < Ryan52> can somebody set some bug importances for me? here's my list (bugnumber => suggested_importance_level): 105078 => low, 105082 => low, 276517 => low, 276525 => low, 276529 => medium, 276530 => low, 293240 => medium [17:52] Ryan52, use power for? [17:52] 01:22 -!- woody86 [n=steve@adsl-76-217-94-220.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net] has joined #ubuntu-bugs [17:52] 01:28 < Ryan52> and, can somebody change the status on 276534 to wont fix instead of invalid. I knew there was a won't fix, but not seeing it in the list made me think I was wrong...and now I figured out that there is a status called wont't fix, but I just don't have permission to use it. -_- [17:52] techno_freak: that :) [17:53] Ryan52, isn't there a reason for marking it invalid [17:53] ? [17:54] techno_freak: I did that. I shouldn't have. It's a perfectly fine bug report (nothing "invalid" about it), I just don't want to fix it. [17:54] bug 276534 [17:54] Launchpad bug 276534 in gstm "gstm should drop gaskpass and Depend: ssh-askpass" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/276534 [17:55] and, I don't think I mentioned an importance for that one, but it should be Wishlist, as it's sort of a new feature. :) [17:55] Ryan52, well, marking it as invalid moves it away from attention. marking it as new or confirmed, and giving out a reason for won't fix might help [17:56] if you look at it, I said this: [17:56] Since all of these bugs are extremely trivial to fix, I will just fix the bugs themselves and not replace gaskpass. [17:56] Thanks, though. -- Ryan [17:57] Ryan52, ya, just saw it. a bit of patience might help, am sure somebody will read through and make the change :) [17:57] techno_freak: can't you? :D [17:58] Ryan52, If I could, it would've got done by now ;) [17:58] okay :( [18:00] it's not so much that I don't have patience, but irc is not a very good way of asking for help like this, as people come and go, and people forget easily. so I ask every 8 hours or so to remind them :) [18:01] Ryan52, well at most times, someone from bug control is awake and helps out instantly, i don't see much activity in other channels as well [18:02] okay. [18:20] I'll ask again in 8 hours, then give up and stop trying to help Ubuntu. cause I really don't care that much. -_- [18:22] Ryan52: What is the change you need? [18:23] 01:15 < Ryan52> can somebody set some bug importances for me? here's my list (bugnumber => suggested_importance_level): 105078 => low, 105082 => low, 276517 => low, 276525 => low, 276529 => medium, 276530 => low, 293240 => medium [18:23] 01:22 -!- woody86 [n=steve@adsl-76-217-94-220.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net] has joined #ubuntu-bugs [18:23] 01:28 < Ryan52> and, can somebody change the status on 276534 to wont fix instead of invalid. I knew there was a won't fix, but not seeing it in the list made me think I was wrong...and now I figured out that there is a status called wont't fix, but I just don't have permission to use it. -_- [18:25] Ryan52: Done. I'll trust your judgement (since you are the Original-Maintainer) [18:26] yay! thanks so much! :) [18:26] You're welcome Ryan52 [18:26] Thank you for your pacience [18:27] Ryan52: Was that the only thing you needed done? [18:28] did you do these? [18:28] 10:23 < Ryan52> 01:15 < Ryan52> can somebody set some bug importances for me? here's my list (bugnumber => suggested_importance_level): 105078 => low, 105082 => low, 276517 => low, 276525 => low, 276529 => medium, 276530 => low, 293240 => medium [18:28] * Ryan52 only sees the "Wont fix" change [18:28] No, I didn't see that list [18:29] Give me a few minutes to go through it [18:31] Why would 105082 be low? [18:31] seems like a "A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of an application" issue to me. [18:32] (to quote the wiki page) [18:33] I don't know. I personally wouldn't consider having Esc close the application a bug. It was done intentionally. This bug report is asking for that feature to be changed. I personally would think of it more of a wishlist bug [18:33] okay, ya, I suppose so. I was debating about that one. [18:34] so ya, Wishlist is fine. [18:36] Ryan52: Is there a reason Ubuntu Bugs is subscribed to 276517? [18:37] I didn't do it. [18:39] And why is 276529 meant to be medium? [18:41] If it's honestly trying to ask that question, it would be quite confusing to not see the end. [18:42] I still think it would be Low. It isn't honestly affecting the usability. The bug just makes a question confusing. [18:42] okay, go for it. [18:45] Ryan52: I think I got all of the bugs in your list [18:45] yup, you did, thanks! :) [18:45] You're welcome [18:45] gotta go, bye. [18:46] Bye Ryan52 [19:22] Hello quick question. I've found a bug in yelp that has remerged with intrepid. The bug #112002 used to be around in fiesty and was fixed and closed. So do I report a completely new bug? or do something else? [19:22] Launchpad bug 112002 in yelp "Wrong url for the online search." [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/112002 [19:26] hi i think this is a bona fide bug, its keepin me stuck in the office unable to leave anyway http://www.pastie.org/321477 its an issue with apamor and bind from what i can tell [19:29] Alright well i marked the old bug as new and added a comment since no one is around hopefully this was proper. === andre___ is now known as andre__ [20:34] can someone please mark bug 301054 -> low. I think it also needs to be upstreamed. [20:34] Launchpad bug 301054 in firefox-3.0 "Title text longer than a certain amount will not show in Element Properties dialog box" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/301054 [20:50] actually, bug 301052 can also be set to low importance [20:50] Launchpad bug 301052 in gnome-games "Nibbles: pressing arrowkeys down and right make you lose control" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/301052 [20:54] angusthefuzz: done! [21:04] thanks nellery :-) [21:04] no problem === paul__ is now known as Elbrus [23:23] hey guys, how can i receive files via bluetooth from a nokia N95??? [23:24] #ubuntu for support? [23:24] hmm wrong channel sorry [23:24] yeap... :)