[00:26] <bryce> yay
[07:24] <tjaalton> whee, server-1.6-branch
[08:14] <bryce> yep
[08:14] <bryce> I think we all should chip in and buy seb128 a better ISP ;-)
[08:15] <tjaalton> heh
[08:15] <tjaalton> I'm getting a 10/10 fiber home
[08:15] <bryce> sweet
[08:15] <tjaalton> 100/10 is overkill
[08:15] <seb128> bryce: thanks but right now that was me restarting my irc client to try some changes
[08:15] <seb128> but better internet connection would be nice though ;-)
[08:17] <bryce> today finally was the last of having verizon visiting.  Now finally, after weeks more than I expected, everything is perfect.
[08:18] <bryce> tjaalton: if you'd prefer focusing on getting xserver merged, I can tackle the -intel merge tomorrow
[08:19] <bryce> otherwise I'll probably do inkscape
[08:19] <tjaalton> bryce: I've got 1.5.3 ready, needs the new evdev though
[08:19] <tjaalton> 1.6beta probably means rebuilding all the drivers again
[08:20] <tjaalton> meh, I'll upload 1.5.3 and evdev 2.1.0 now
[08:20] <bryce> sounds good
[08:20] <tjaalton> then we at least have _something_ new :)
[08:21] <bryce> what are the big new features in 1.6?  GEM-ishness?
[08:21] <tjaalton> that and some EXA improvements, like the glyph cache which should boost performance
[08:21] <tjaalton> it's basically master without MPX/XI2
[08:22]  * bryce nods
[08:23] <bryce> I scrolled through the changelog from keith; tons of changes, I guess lots of bug fixes?  :-)
[08:25] <tjaalton> heh, probably and hopefully
[08:25] <bryce> btw, work in process but I've been drafting a page on writing drivers for Ubuntu X - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/DriverDevelopment
[08:26] <bryce> so far just focused on "why you need to make your driver open source"
[08:26] <tjaalton> I marked the 'multiple primary graphics devices detected OMG' bug as a blocker for 1.6
[08:27] <tjaalton> hmm are there other candidates to open up besides nvidia? (psb?)
[08:28] <tjaalton> VIA released docs last week
[08:28] <tjaalton> and partnered with the openchrome project
[08:28] <bryce> saw that :-)
[08:28] <bryce> yeah unfortunately there are still other hw vendors left to advocate
[08:29] <tjaalton> mvo: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?h=server-1.6-branch&id=c8472a74441838e16d0d3414db1fa7fe996868a9
[08:30] <mvo> rock! thanks tjaalton
[08:31]  * bryce waves mvo
[08:34] <mvo> hey bryce! I did the inkscape merge the other day, hope that was ok
[08:34] <bryce> ahh, ok, that explains why grab-merge.sh isn't pulling it
[08:34] <bryce> yeah that's cool.  I should probably clean up the bug tracker at some point here too
[08:35] <bryce> tjaalton: so shall I tackle -intel or do you have that one in hand already?
[08:36] <tjaalton> bryce: I can do that as well, and test it here
[08:36] <tjaalton> ..which reminds me to set up the dualboot jaunty too
[08:37] <bryce> tjaalton: you make my job far too easy :-)
[08:37] <tjaalton> bryce: :)
[08:38] <bryce> btw, do you have a script for filing sync requests?  I was thinking of roughing up something based on launchpadlib
[08:38] <tjaalton> I've used requestsync
[08:39] <tjaalton> or what was it called
[08:39] <bryce> *nod*  yeah me too
[08:39] <bryce> I've used that a fair bit, but I think I could code up something a bit more robust
[09:59] <wgrant> bryce: What's wrong with requestsync? It can use launchpadlib now tooo.
[10:04] <bryce> wgrant: you sure?  It looks like it still uses python-launchpad-bugs
[10:12] <tjaalton> you just need to use the --lp flag
[10:25] <bryce> --lp triggers the p-l-b stuff.  anyway, will look more tomorrow.  night!
[10:26] <tjaalton> oh, ok
[10:26] <tjaalton> night
[12:23] <Kano> hi jcristau , you package for debian too or?
[12:24] <jcristau> s/too//
[12:25] <Kano> jcristau: then can you tell me why lenny does not use the multimedia keys by default but ubuntu does?
[12:25] <Kano> like volume control
[13:32] <tjaalton> bryce: looks like I won't be able to merge intel today, so feel free to merge it if you like
[13:36] <tjaalton> libdrm needs a push through NEW
[13:39] <Kano> jcristau: could you update the ati driver in lenny to the version from experimental at least? then dcc with rv410 on vga ports at least
[13:39] <jcristau> no
[16:40] <bryce> superm1: just had a good call with ATI today; went through several bugs, and sounds like we should be getting a slew of EPR's soonish
[16:42] <superm1> great to hear
[16:43] <bryce> the https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/fglrx page I think was well received
[16:44] <superm1> my only fear is that people don't start filing "untriaged" bugs against that project
[16:46] <bryce> mm, guess we'll see
[16:47] <bryce> one interesting note - ati doesn't consider compiz a "supported" feature on fglrx yet, so all bugs involving that are going to be wishlist items (AMD feature #7647)