[05:06] Bug 302251 is a libcanberra issue on Jaunty that I believe has just been fixed. However, libcanberra-gnome first needs to be manually removed. Is this something that needs to be taken care of by update-manager, or by a Replaces dependency? How should I triage this? [05:06] Launchpad bug 302251 in libcanberra "package libcanberra-gtk0 0.6-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/canberra-gtk-play', which is also in package libcanberra-gnome" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/302251 === pckchem is now known as thesecondlaw [06:56] good morning [06:56] hiya [07:21] good morning [07:24] morning people [07:26] tryptophan wearing off everybody? [07:31] no [07:31] maco: I think that takes 24 hours :) [07:31] actually, it never hit me [07:32] it is 1:30 here, and never once did I fall asleep, which is odd for me [07:32] damn Debian packaging today caused me to stay up [07:32] I will sleep like a baby now here in a bit [07:33] Wikipedia says it's a myth... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tryptophan#Turkey_meat_and_drowsiness [07:34] nixternal: hey rich [07:34] wasabi [07:35] * nixternal kicks ftp.us.debian.org [07:35] BUILD DAMNIT! [07:35] well i'm looking at dholbach and thekorn and emgent, but then again...i guess they don't do the turkey thing over in euroland [07:35] no :) [07:35] i didnt eat any turkey, so i'm regular ol' me [07:36] i fail at being american :P [07:36] heh, my nephew ate turkey and passed out before he even finished his plate [07:36] wow [07:36] since I was in India, I'm like 99% vegetarian, so I probably wouldn't have dived into the turkey head-first anyway :) [07:36] heh, 99% [07:37] nixternal: The remaining 1% of him is stainless steel? :) [07:37] I bet [07:37] my mom convinced me to eat some of the greenbean casserole even though it had *cream* of mushroom soup in it. -_- i did but jeez, there's a reason i brought non-dairy sour cream and non-dairy butter with me and made sure the mashed potatoes were totally vegan. my tummy is not happy about that cream of mushroom. [07:37] haha [07:37] or vinyl [07:37] vinyl could well be [07:38] DON'T EAT THE RECORDS! [07:38] especially not *my* records [07:38] you gonna dj at UDS? [07:38] yeah :) [07:38] rock on! [07:38] you are gonna buy all the drinks at UDS? [07:38] because um....reggae and motown don't taste good. yeah, that's it. [07:38] nixternal: the only thing you care about haha [07:38] I don't drink [07:39] just water :p [07:39] dude, i met you at OLF [07:39] no you didn't, that was my twin [07:39] i know you're full of it [07:39] uh huh [07:39] just cuz I was shootin' tequila at 11am during lunch, doesn't mean I drink [07:39] i forgot that part [07:39] oh, keep forgetting then [07:39] i was just thinking about coming back from dinner during the afterparty and seeing you outside going nuts [07:39] because it is funny how everyone else remembers that [07:40] oh man, I don't even want to know [07:40] or the pre-party, with you and jono and dann [07:40] I saw video of me and the after party [07:40] you can either blame that on jono or dan [07:40] or maddog, since he bought me a few rounds with all of his tickets [07:41] nixternal: you *glomped* jono when i said crimsun was there [07:41] wth is glomped? I am afraid to know I think [07:41] oh, i gave my tickets to jorge, i think [07:41] a very forceful jump-on hug [07:41] oh lord [07:42] "jono! daniel chen is here!" [07:42] that is cuz crimsun has been my IRC homie for like 3 years now [07:42] or longer actually [07:42] yes, with your sound card issues [07:42] and it is daniel t. chen :p [07:42] don't forget the t, he might melt [07:43] hahaha well, he's just fine with me calling him just plain "dan" so... [07:48] he uses the t because chen is like the 2nd most common last name in china, and daniel's not exactly an uncommon name either [07:49] if (!full && time > 01:48) { nixternal->sleep(); std::cout << "Good Night!"; } [07:50] * maco snorts LOUDLY [07:50] actually the cout should have come before the sleep(), otherwise it would say good night after I woke up [07:50] eh whatever, point got through [07:50] or just claim it was threaded === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === doko__ is now known as doko [12:10] * BUGabundo_work wonders if james_w could kick in the updates scripts for http://package-import.ubuntu.com/k/kdepim/jaunty-upstream/files/head%3A/kmail/ [12:21] an upgrade to the 2.6.24-22-generic kernell messed up my system, my nvidia drivers are not working anymore and my system doesnt boot anymore [12:21] reboot* [12:24] 2.6.24-22 ? was that moved to hardy-updates already ? (it should only be in proposed for testing purposes yet and be superseded by -23) [12:26] I'm running 8.04 [12:26] yes, your kernel version indicates that [12:26] it was an urgent update [12:27] what does: apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.24-22-generic show ? [12:27] so something went wrong and now I cant get any work done today untill I get it fixed :( [12:27] 1 moment [12:28] btw how do I stop all x servers (Im trying to install my nvidia drivers) [12:28] again [12:29] C0p3rn1c: sudo /etc/init.d/gdm stop ?? [12:29] from a TTY of course [12:29] I tried that [12:29] (I also accedently installed another instance of the x server a while back) [12:29] while running a drivers install program from nvidia [12:30] pff something is wrong with my internet 1 sec [12:30] why dont you just switch back to 2.6.24-21 ? [12:30] also the output of the apt-cache policy command above would be *very* intresting [12:31] ogra: yeah Im kinda new to ubuntu and I dident thought about that untill after I tried to install other nvidia drivers [12:31] Im currently into the previous kernell [12:31] right [12:32] i dont think the 2.6.24-22 is thought for production use [12:32] but the at-cache policy command should show where you got it from [12:32] I cant get my pastebin open :s [12:33] http://rafb.net/p/y9NFRf70.html [12:33] (apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.24-22-generic) [12:34] oh, seems you really got it from hardy-updates [12:34] yes and I suggest that you reverse this because alot of users are going to get into trouble with this [12:34] can you please file a bug about that against the linux package [12:35] so the uploaders are aware of breakage there [12:35] ogra: ok what should I include? [12:35] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux [12:35] main updates 2.6.24-22.45 main proposed 2.6.24-23.46 [12:35] well, describe closely what happened after your upgrade [12:35] pff this is really a big mistake, it will damadge the reputation of ubuntu, at least it did with me [12:36] Published on 2008-11-27 [12:36] and which version of envyng as well as linux-restricted-modules you use [12:36] -- Stefan Bader < stefan.bader@canonical.com> Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:19:02 +0100 [12:36] since either of tehm ships the nvidia drivers [12:37] oh I see there 2.6.28 for jaunty [12:37] envyng 1.1.1 [12:38] yep since some days [12:38] but I still don't have them available for install [12:38] but normally I run the latest beta drivers [12:38] probably didnt build for all arches yet or sit in the NEW queue [12:38] from nvidia [12:38] well [12:38] well.... [12:38] beta indicates something, doesnt it ? :) [12:39] I just started to install other drivers after they dident work anymore [12:39] the strangest thing since I have 2.6.28 on my apt-changes log [12:39] but it aint on grub or /boot [12:39] the first thing I did was to install the stable nvidia drivers [12:39] they also dident work [12:40] * BUGabundo_work out for lunch [12:40] the ones you normally get from "hardware drivers" [12:41] after that I tried envyng, and this also failed, and now I was trying to install the latest stable drivers from the nvida website [12:41] but I cant seem to kill all my x servers [12:41] so you installed multiple different nvidia drivers at the sae time ? that sounds like you made quite a mess [12:42] only one driver can run at the same time right? [12:43] the drivers themself always remove previous installed drivers as far as i know [12:44] so guess I was wrong ? [12:44] the nvidia drivers from nvidia do what they like to ... they are not packaged so nothing in your system knows they did replace stuff [12:45] if yu use packaged drivers replacements should be handled ... [12:45] ah ok [12:46] if you go to #nvidia the subject of today is "Ubuntu kernel module problem? Ask in #ubuntu" [12:46] so I guess Im not the only one [12:47] well, as i said, file a bug, give info so the kernel team knows about it and use -21 in the meantime [12:48] ok [12:49] first I have to fix this low-resolution [12:51] bbl [13:19] apperently the /etc/init.d/gdm script doesnt stop your x-server while the low-graphics drivers dialog is still displayed on screen [13:22] anyways I'm back to nvidia driver 180.06 and kernell 2.6.24-21-generic and everything works again === asac_ is now known as asac === LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox === bddebian2 is now known as bddebian === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [17:08] debian bug 497674 [17:08] Debian bug 497674 in serpentine "serpentine: FTBFS in lenny: Nonexistent build-dependency: muine" [Serious,Closed] http://bugs.debian.org/497674 [17:09] have a good weekend people [17:09] ryanakca - was that meant to go in #ubuntu-motu? [17:13] chrisccoulson: no, I just use this (usually dead) channel for getting bug links so that I don't pollute #ubuntu-motu [17:13] lol [17:14] I could /msg ubottu for it... but then I'd need to close the /query window, big todo and all, ya know :P [18:04] asac: ping [18:04] asac: I like like my own kid [18:04] but right now, I fill like to slap you silly [18:04] LOL [18:04] lateste NM update makes WPA time out again [18:05] network-manager (0.7~~svn20081018t105859-0ubuntu2) jaunty; urgency=low [18:17] BUGabundo: how long did it take to connect? [18:18] (before) [18:18] did you use a PPA thing? [18:18] (which version did you use before) [18:18] thanks [18:19] I'm on jaunty asac [18:19] I had the ppa version when using ibex [18:19] but since the upgrade, I had a jaunty version [18:19] no PPA for jaunty [18:19] so it was a lower version [18:20] BUGabundo: unlikely that this made your thing timeout [18:20] just got the update, after reboot, could not conect to wpa [18:20] BUGabundo: the jaunty package before had no timeout tweak iirc [18:20] keeps timeing out [18:20] so now you have 60 seconds ... previously you had 25 [18:20] it was working 100% for me [18:20] something changed [18:20] and was today [18:20] last night it was working fine [18:21] BUGabundo: check that it takes 60 seconds please [18:21] tailing the log [18:21] tail -fn0 syslog correct? [18:23] yep asac [18:23] 60 secs [18:23] ok [18:23] BUGabundo: what other packages were updated? [18:23] did you reboot your system recently? [18:23] yep [18:23] at 17h GMT [18:24] why? [18:24] can I email my apt changes? [18:24] BUGabundo: email? paste please [18:24] okay [18:24] I rebooted because job ended [18:24] lol [18:25] asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/77803/ [18:26] BUGabundo: whats that? [18:26] thats the only packages upgraded in your upgrade? [18:27] BUGabundo: try to downgrade to ubuntu1 and see if it starts to work again [18:27] you need to downgrade: [18:27] network-manager libnm-util0 libnm-glib0 [18:27] and before that http://paste.ubuntu.com/77806/ [18:27] let me check my cache [18:28] asac http://paste.ubuntu.com/77807/ I have this [18:28] is any of them good? [18:29] no ubuntu1 version [18:41] any more ideas asac? [18:46] no ... not really. why do you send me changes mail? [18:47] (in the paste) [18:47] dont you have a apt log or something? [18:52] I have apt-changes installed [18:52] it send root the new packages [18:52] and I read them with mutt asac [18:53] I don't know that apt-log [18:53] nor does apt-cache show [19:52] 19:27 < asac> BUGabundo: try to downgrade to ubuntu1 and see if it starts to work again [19:52] 19:27 < asac> you need to downgrade: [19:52] (in future i wont repeat anymore) [19:52] 19:27 < asac> network-manager libnm-util0 libnm-glib0 [19:52] ;) [21:22] I added an insight that seems new to me to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxsampler/+bug/252330 , which is marked 'wont fix' [21:22] Ubuntu bug 252330 in linuxsampler "[needs-packaging] linuxsampler" [Wishlist,Won't fix] [21:22] what's the proper way to bring this under the attention again? [21:25] raboof: well posting the comment and asking here are two good ways! [21:26] persia, who marked the bug as wontfix, is subscribed so he should see it [21:27] ok, then it's time for me to be patient i guess :) [21:27] raboof: he isn't on now but if you don't see a response in a few days you could ping him here on IRC [21:28] i'll keep that in mind, thanks. how do I see who marked it wontfix? [21:30] oh, the 'activity log'. right :) [22:02] Hm, when does update-manager ask you to manually update? re bug 303251 [22:02] Launchpad bug 303251 in ubuntu "applet" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/303251