/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/12/03/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/79548/  i see line 2 but not line 6, any idea? locally, it's fine00:06
asacfta: maybe &2 isnt really &2 in make?00:08
asacoh its in shell00:08
ftai doubt cdbs changed recently00:08
asacfta: so it doesnt parse for you?00:09
ftait's stuck on hardy/intrepid/jaunty00:09
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/+builds/hassium00:09
ftalocally: http://paste.ubuntu.com/79546/00:10
ftaoh,00:10
asacnever seens a two tarball cdbs thing ;)00:11
asacmaybe it was always broken?00:11
ftadpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i38600:12
fta fakeroot debian/rules clean00:12
fta/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:72: parsing songbird-1.0.0-source.tar.bz2 xulrunner-1.9.0.3-source.tar.bz2 ...00:12
ftaParsing songbird-1.0.0-source.tar.bz2...00:12
ftaParsing xulrunner-1.9.0.3-source.tar.bz2...00:12
ftatest -x debian/rules00:12
ftavs00:12
asacfta: how long is it stuck there?00:13
ftadpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i38600:13
fta /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean00:13
fta/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:72: parsing songbird-1.0.0-source.tar.bz2 xulrunner-1.9.0.3-source.tar.bz2 ...00:13
ftatest -x debian/rules00:13
fta>1h00:13
asacmaybe its just soyuz bustage00:13
asace.g. no pulse/update of log00:13
ftanada00:13
asacor dead VM00:13
asaci think ppas are xen00:13
asacfta: yes. i mean it could be that launchpad has  a bug and build logs are not pushed anymore00:14
asacor the build is really stuck which could be hardware, or simply VM brokeness ... I think you should ask launchpad folks if it works locally00:14
asacfta: does it happen on other archs as well?00:14
ftai did, cprov has no clue00:14
ftayes, all 3*3 builders00:15
asac9 builders ;)? fun00:15
asacif cprov has no clue then we dont either imo ;)00:16
asaci am sure that at some point someone will take a look ;)00:16
asaclatest when people notice that builds pile up00:16
ftai asked for a pstree or strace or something, got nothing00:17
ftait's easy to troubleshoot if you have access to the box00:17
asacnot sure if he has access00:17
asacgiven that its just a xen sandbox ... it might have no login ;)00:18
asacbut pure speculation on my side00:18
ftahe killed them all so no more chance to investigate :(00:31
asacdo they work normal again?00:32
ftai don't know, he deleted them00:43
asacfta: ok so we can retry?00:45
ftai can repush the same thing, hoping it will not reject it00:46
asacfta: did he say that there is a chance that its better now?00:49
ftaread #lp00:49
asacfta: wasnt in there00:49
ftaoh, hold on00:49
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/79563/00:51
asacfta: id say you should try one more time after giving the other packages a few slots ;)00:59
asacfta: how did you create the tarballs?00:59
asacin jaunty?01:00
asactry to create them in intrepid chroot or something01:00
asactar might have changed ;)01:00
jcastrofta: is it possible to install extensions in prism yet?01:40
ftajcastro, in the version in my ppa (0.9.1.*), it sure is possible10:06
directhexping11:00
* directhex needs a sexy mozillateam dev11:01
asacdirecthex: sexy ... not me ;)11:01
asachehe11:01
asacfta: you eliinated the venkman rename patch right?11:01
asacthanks11:01
directhexasac, if a plugin (supposedly) works with ff3.1 as well as ff3, what should i Depends:? it's currently xulrunner-1.911:02
asacdirecthex: xulrunner-1.9 | xulrunner-1.9.111:03
directhexgood good.11:03
asacdirecthex: and ensure tha you have maxVersoin 1.9.* with toolkit@mozilla.org11:03
asacas targetApplication11:03
asacdirecthex: if you dont have that targetApplication it usually means you should directly depend on ffox 3.1/3.011:03
directhexhm11:04
directhex        <em:minVersion>@MIN_FIREFOX_VERSION@</em:minVersion>11:04
directhex        <em:maxVersion>@MAX_FIREFOX_VERSION@</em:maxVersion>11:04
directhexhandy!11:04
directhexi don't think i'm looking at the right file. hrm.....11:05
directhexasac, i'm not sure i understand what you mean WRT maxVersion & targetApplication11:10
asacdirecthex: if targetApplication is not toolkit@mozilla.org then its wrong to depend on xulrunner-1.911:18
asacdirecthex: what counts here is what comes out of  <em:maxVersion>@MAX_FIREFOX_VERSION@</em:maxVersion>11:18
asacafter the biuld11:18
asacplease check that tfile11:18
directhexasac, install.rdf isn't part of the package... should it be?11:19
* directhex tests; works fine on 3.111:19
directhexthere's nothing like actual testing to see if it behaves11:21
asacdirecthex: if its not part then your extension doenst work11:24
directhexasac, s/extension/plugin/11:24
asac(install.rdf)11:24
directhexasac, i don't see any manifests with any other plugins...11:26
directhexextensions, sure11:26
asacdirecthex: didnt you say you are looking at an extension?11:34
directhex[11:02] <directhex> asac, if a plugin (supposedly) works with ff3.1 as well as ff3, what should i Depends:? it's currently xulrunner-1.911:35
asacotherwise all should just work. biuld against 1.9 and it will work in 1.9.1 ... so just extend the depends11:35
asacok11:35
directhexasac, can you check my Npp-foo?11:37
asacdirecthex: paste those please11:37
directhexasac, hell, you can have a source package if you want to check11:37
directhexasac, http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mono/moon/trunk/debian/control?op=file&rev=0&sc=011:37
asacnope ;)11:37
* asac looks11:37
* asac looks at other package ;)11:39
directhex?11:39
asacnot sure if everything is right ;) ... so I look at other package i did ;)11:39
asacdirecthex: just check that the file yo usee in about:plugins has the file you use in Npp as a substring11:41
asacif thats the case all shoulud be fine11:41
directhex    File name: libmoonloader.so11:41
asacdirecthex: can we shorten the Description a bit?11:42
asacthere are two lines in the pfs result:11:42
asac1. Name11:42
asac2. Description11:42
asaci have the feeling thats a bit too long11:42
asacmaybe s/Microsoft/ ?11:42
asacdirecthex: err11:43
asacactually. you dont need to repeat the name there11:43
directhexasac, the npp-description you mean?11:43
asaci think Description: Web Browser plugin for silverlight content11:44
asacor something11:44
asaci think Description: Web Browser plugin for Silverlight ;)11:44
asacdirecthex: let me check i fi have a screen11:45
directhexasac, hit f5, is that description better?11:47
asacdirecthex: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/pfs-desc.png11:47
asacdirecthex: yeah. i think so. if you have ubufox. edit config in about:config11:48
asacsearch for pfs ... for both entries that pop up, double click and at the very end there is 8.0411:48
asacchange that to 8.1011:48
asacthen visit a flash site11:48
asacwhen load finished you can open the plugin alternative dialog in Tools -> Manage Content Plugins11:48
asacthere you can "Searh ..." for content types... for flash you will see the screen11:49
asacjust so that you can guess how much space you have11:49
directhexasac, i don't think the plugin finder will help much yet anyway - javascripting your way out of showing the actual plugin bar, youtube-style, is the norm with silverlight11:49
asacthe 8.10 fix is currently in proposed11:49
asacdirecthex: well. given that the Npp- headers are just for that its right to still look there11:50
asacto verify what you type ;)11:50
asacdirecthex: also ... once firefox knows about that content type you can still search through that dialog ;)11:51
asaclater you can slo install content plugins from the preferences -> applications pane11:52
asacso once gnome knows about the silverlight content you can also search from there for the plugin11:52
asaccontent=mime-type11:52
asacis it already a well known mime tpye?11:52
asacdirecthex:11:53
asacgrep silverli /etc/mime.types  | wc -l11:53
asac011:53
directhexgah, this guy's talking about XUL. i go to a supercomputing conference, and he's talking about sodding xul11:53
asaclol11:53
directhexhm. why would "manage content plugins" be greyed out?11:54
asacdirecthex: thats more or less a bug11:54
asacdirecthex: you need to visit a site where some plugin is used11:54
asacdirecthex: initially it was designed to allow you to configure just the used content types11:55
asacbut then the dialog allowed to configure all content types11:55
directhexasac, still greyed out :/11:55
asacdirecthex: if you are on a flash site it should work11:55
asacdirecthex: only problem could be that you have flashblock11:55
asacand dont auto play content11:55
directhexasac, youtube?11:55
asacworks here yes.11:56
asacdirecthex: flashblock most likely11:56
directhexmy computer evidently hates me11:56
directhexasac, nope. punishment for using 64-bit flash .so from adobe labs instead of a package?11:56
asacdirecthex: unlikely11:56
directhexhm. my computer just hates me then :/11:57
asacdirecthex: maybe you have a ubufox installed in your profile?11:57
asacwhich could be old and broken ;)11:57
directhexsod it, good enough for a -1.11:58
asacsod?11:58
directhexworth filing a bug against mime-support & requesting SL be added?11:58
asacdirecthex: yes.11:59
directhexfiled.12:03
directhexright. lunchtime12:03
asacdirecthex: i would suggest that you also forward that to debian directly12:13
asacand link the bugs12:13
asacfta2: about xul 1.9.1 and xul 1.9.0 divergence ... i think its ok to fork away now and dont merge anymore. the few things i still have to do on 1.9.0 can be done in parallel imo13:29
asacmain focus should be 1.9.1 anyway13:30
fta2ok13:30
directhexasac, i was sending straight to submit@b.d.o - except this hotel wifi seems to block port 2513:30
directhexso it'll have to wait until this evening13:30
asacok13:30
directhexunless i can find where in evo to change the smtp port13:31
asacfta2: prism .... is there a particular reason you dont run the stub insetad of /usr/bin/xulrunner-1.9?13:32
fta2asac, do you have time to troubleshoot something on ff3.1 ?13:32
asacseems like prism-bin is somehow not packaged up13:32
asacwhich should be used instead13:32
fta2asac, see prism 0.9.* in my ppa, not the old 0.813:32
asacfta2: that uses the stub?13:32
asaccool13:32
fta2yes13:32
asacfta2: does it also produce refactor extension?13:33
fta2yes13:33
asaceven cooler ;)13:33
asacdesktop integration still lacks i guess ... or did upstream get to that?13:33
fta2it's not there yet13:33
asack13:33
asacfta2: not sure if i have time for 3.1 ;) ... whats the prob?13:34
fta2go to sony.com, enter the shop, add something to your cart, expected result is to see the cart with the item, but instead, you're back to the home page, with an empty cart13:35
asachmm13:35
asacfta2: did you see the canonical.com bug?13:35
asac;)13:35
asacwas filed in response to my blog i think13:36
asaclets see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.113:36
asacbug 30422113:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 304221 in firefox-3.1 "Canonical Recruitment: Unable to attach resume 3.1 Specific" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30422113:36
asacdo you see that too?13:36
fta2mconnor said it's fine for him with a post b2 snapshot but i doubt it's that. probably a xul-sdk bug or something i missed13:36
asachmm13:37
asacwhat is fine ... sony? or canonical recruitement check boxes?13:37
fta2sony13:37
asaci have b3pre13:38
asaclets see13:38
asacfta2: sony US?13:38
fta2yes13:38
asaci was asked if i wanted us or germany13:38
asaccannot even find a product on their page13:40
asacso i cannot add anything to card13:40
asacwhat a messy thing13:40
asacok seems like computres/notbeooks cannot be boughts13:40
asacjust accessories13:40
asacat least i dont get any shop like items there13:40
asacworks for me13:41
asacadded a usb flash drive13:41
asacnow i am in cart13:41
asaclest try 3.1 package13:41
asacthats b213:42
asacadding "13:43
asacadd1GB Micro Vault Click USB Flash Drive13:43
asacUSM-1GL"13:43
asacworks in b2 :/13:43
asachmm13:43
asacextension problem i guess then13:44
fta2really ? it doesn't for me, tried in 3 different pc13:44
asacsince you have disabled compatibility check i wouldnt be too scared13:44
asacstrange13:44
asacmaybe its just some product?13:44
asacMozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2) Gecko/20081203 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Shiretoko/3.1b213:44
fta2http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=819855292166536842713:46
fta2just tried this one13:46
fta2i'm using intrepid here. i have a lot of errors wtr locales. maybe it's better in jaunty13:48
asacfta2: i get to a page "Choose your Extended Service Plan"13:48
asacat lesat not the homepage13:48
fta2yes, that's correct13:48
asacfta2: anything else i should try?13:58
asacfta2: now i have tmp installed ... can i also navigate vertically if i have multiple tab rows?14:00
asacJazzva: we really need a new nspluginwrapper ;)14:16
asacfeedback on upstream list is quite good so far14:16
asaclots of issues resolved ... seems to get more stable14:16
asaclet me know when i have something to upload .... and also for SRU14:16
Jazzvaasac, ok, i'll finish it today. Sorry for the delay14:16
asacdo we have a .ubuntu branch?14:16
JazzvaI think we do, we made it for 1.0.014:17
asacJazzva: not a problem at all ;) ... just wanted to give a soft nagging as i read those postivie comments14:17
asacJazzva: not for the current version?14:17
asacJazzva: if so we usually want to create a .intrepid branch for what wsa released14:17
Jazzvaasac, nope, but we will use it for the current.14:17
asacJazzva: hmm ... sure? wasnt it fta who updated last?14:18
Jazzvayou mean to use .ubuntu for current devel release?14:18
asacJazzva: we have 1.1.0-0ubuntu114:18
asacseems right14:18
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu14:18
asachmm ubuntu2 is in archive14:18
asacshould be easy to replay14:19
Jazzvayeah, I think 1.1.0 didn't work right, so I think we didn't publish that one... at least not m work14:19
asacfta2: did you push ubuntu2?14:19
Jazzva*my work14:19
Jazzvaasac, fta did it14:19
Jazzvahttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper14:19
asacfta2: if not plesae push that to branch ;) ... i guess you just forgot that14:19
asacJazzva: yeah. but its just one or two commits missing then ;)14:19
fta2hold on, let me check14:19
asacand most likely fta just forgot ;)14:19
Jazzvaasac, I'm actually wrong. we wen't to 1.1.0 directly, skipping 1.0.0. my mistake :)14:20
asacheh14:20
asacbut all is in bzr14:20
asacthats good14:20
fta2ubuntu or upstream?14:21
asacJazzva: oh14:21
fta2Using saved push location: bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/nspluginwrapper/upstream/14:21
fta2Format <RepositoryFormatKnit1> for lp-44825424:///~ubuntu-dev/nspluginwrapper/upstream/.bzr is deprecated - please use 'bzr upgrade' to get better performance14:21
fta2No new revisions to push.14:21
asaci looked at wrong branch14:21
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu14:21
asacthats the right one14:21
asacit has 1.1.2-0ubuntu114:21
asacJazzva: that should be right14:21
fta2Using saved push location: bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu/14:22
fta2No new revisions to push.14:22
asacfta2: was that ever uploaded?14:22
Jazzvaasac, ok, I'll merge from that before seeing if any new work needs to be done14:22
asacapt-cache shows strange things for me14:22
asacJazzva: no need to merge ... start with that branch14:22
asacmerge new .upstream in that14:22
Jazzvaasac, hmm... so to dispose my current branches?14:23
asacJazzva: e.g. dump your branch in favour of the release branch ... most likely you could just pull14:23
Jazzvak14:23
asacJazzva: yes. user branches should always be abandoned for each and every release14:23
asacat least i think that makes merging easier14:23
asacJazzva: you can just push --overwrite for next submission14:23
JazzvaI deleted them already, so I think no --overwrite is needed14:24
asacJazzva: nobody knows ... its launchpad :-P14:24
asacbut you will notice soon enough14:24
Jazzvaheh :)14:24
asacfta2: seems like we have a new sec update round in 10 days or so :/14:25
asacfolks ... give me some rest :)14:25
Jazzvahave fun :)14:25
asacat least i am not at UDS at that point anymore14:25
fta2asac, too bad, they removed my tarball for songbird, i need to bump is now :(14:46
fta2it14:46
asacfta2: they remove sonbird tarballs?14:59
asacyou mean soyuz?14:59
asacfta2: cant you reupload tarball?14:59
asacfta2: have you tried to use intrepid to create the tarball?14:59
fta2nope, rejected, i need to bump it14:59
asacfta2: i saw tar bustage recently due to too new tar ;)14:59
fta2lp guys asked me to reup to investigate15:00
asacso better stick to old tar ;)15:00
asacah15:00
asacok then15:00
fta2songbird_1.0.0+0-0ubuntu1~fta1_source.changes15:00
asacthats ok i guess15:01
fta2instead of 1.0.0+whydidyouremovemytarball.orig.tar.gz15:01
asacthat would have been ok too15:01
asac1.0.0+builddbomb15:02
fta2asac, same issue, which is good, hm.. sort of :S lamont is on it15:27
asacfta2: yeah. lamont should be able to figure ;)15:38
* asac off for errands15:44
gnomefreakdid you fix enigmail?15:47
gnomefreakasac: ^^ when you get back if im here.15:48
mconnorhmm16:39
mconnorasac: I only see like six bugs, can you send me a list of the rest?16:39
mconnormaybe I'm searching wrong16:40
gnomefreakmconnor: what package are you looking for?16:47
mconnorpackage?16:47
mconnorI'm looking for the bugs asac was filing upstream and attaching patches for16:47
fta2mconnor, in the name of each patch file16:48
mconnorfta2: we don't have a bug XXX :)16:49
fta2lol16:49
mconnorgod16:49
gnomefreakah upstream bugs, yeah he wanted me to follow the ones he commented on but i never figured that out16:49
fta2mconnor, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.1.head16:49
fta2mconnor, the last few commits16:50
gnomefreakwhat the hell happened to the GTK version of yakuake16:50
mconnorfta2: yeah, like I said, I've found like six16:50
gnomefreaktilda sucks it doesnt fold16:50
mconnorI was expecting more like... 25 :)16:51
fta2mconnor, and in https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.1.head16:51
gnomefreakfta2: hows holiday going?16:51
fta2mconnor, i'm not sure if asac is done or done, i just received the commit logs16:52
mconnorfta2: ok, well, I got the impression he was done :)16:53
fta2gnomefreak, i'm not in holidays, i'm at work right now, buried with work. I'm not even supposed to be here. bad me.16:53
gnomefreakfta2: ah i thought this week was vacation/holiday16:54
fta2i wish16:54
gnomefreakfta2: is there something wrong with chromium-testsuite17:13
Jazzvafta2, if you have been working with nspluginwrapper, do you know what was npclass_check() supposed to do? it's out of source now. it was included in a patch from fedora, which is dropped in the devel sources in fedora (at least afaics).17:13
fta2gnomefreak, still a work in progress. some stuff need to be patched to be packaged17:13
gnomefreakits held back in upgrade but install gives The following extra packages will be installed: python-tlslite17:13
gnomefreakThe following NEW packages will be installed: python-tlslite17:13
gnomefreakThe following packages will be upgraded: chromium-testsuite17:14
fta2yes, it is in my ppa too17:14
fta2i packaged it17:14
gnomefreakreason i ask is because all other held back packages can be installed without problems17:14
fta2it should install just fine. some tests are failing because they need files in the source tree. i'll fix that when i have some free time17:15
gnomefreakfta2: its not just this package though17:16
gnomefreakits every held back package including PA17:16
gnomefreaksee #ubuntu-devel for more on the subject17:17
fta2?17:23
gnomefreakfta: its weird chromium-browser and chromiumv8 are not installible from your repos and i have chromium-testsuite installed and still no browser oh and songbird FTBFS in your PPA18:14
Jazzvaasac, I updated nspluginwrapper... dumped two patches which came from fedora (our 006 and 007), because they dropped it too... the current state (1.1.8 with only few old patches) works, but breaks current wrappers18:16
Jazzvaasac, I noticed fedora has some new patches, so I'll take a look at them18:17
asacJazzva: great. but recreating wrappers helps to improve user experience?18:17
asac;)18:17
asace.g. can you confirm that its much better now?18:17
asacshould be more stable and better performances for windowless plugins18:17
Jazzvawindowless plugins == embedded?18:18
Jazzvaasac, ^^18:18
asacJazzva: plugins AND plugins that support windowless mode ;)18:19
asace.g. flash 9 == window18:20
asacflash 10 == windowless18:20
asacunless you explictily disable that in /etc/adobe/config.mmm.cfg18:20
asacoops18:20
asacmmm.cfg ;)18:20
asacJazzva: $ cat /etc/adobe/mmm.cfg18:20
asac#WindowlessDisable=false18:20
asacif i comment that in, flash will be much better because its using non-windowless mode again ... of course the "flash always on top of html" bug would be back18:21
Jazzvawell... i haven't used nspluginwrapper before :), and it all worked well for me. I'll have to check it now with both old and new version18:21
asac(which is why we need windowless ;))18:21
gnomefreakthats set to disabled im assuming by defualt18:21
asacJazzva: you should use it ;)18:21
asacits supposed to be the preferred way even on i38618:22
asac;)18:22
Jazzvareally? umm, ok :)18:22
asacJazzva: thats the vision18:22
asacmove plugins to different process18:22
Jazzvaok, let me test it18:22
asacespecially if they have a crashy backgraound ;)18:22
asacthat reminds me that some funny person blacklisted nspluginwrapper on the biuldds ... just after i enabled it to build there18:23
gnomefreak!info firefox18:38
ubottufirefox (source: firefox-3.0): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 (intrepid), package size 67 kB, installed size 124 kB18:38
asacfta: nspluginwrapper is unblacklisted ... finally18:39
gnomefreak!info addblock-plus18:41
ubottuPackage addblock-plus does not exist in intrepid18:41
gnomefreaki guess we dont have it in repos18:42
mconnorasac: can you stick the analysis you gave bsmedberg into the bmo bug so dolske can look at it?18:43
asacmconnor: sure18:43
dolskeis this the toolkit branding thing?18:44
mconnorwhoa, dolske's here18:45
mconnorstalker18:46
dolske:)18:46
mconnordolske: yes, it is18:46
mconnorasac: I presume there are either more bugs to be filed, or I'm missing something?18:50
gnomefreakcrap19:04
gnomefreakasac:  what time is next meeting on the 7th?19:05
Jazzvagnomefreak, I think we will delay it cause of UDS, but I might be wrong19:08
gnomefreakah i just got email and deleted by mistake thats why i asked19:09
gnomefreakJazzva: are you muto yet?19:09
gnomefreakmotu even19:09
Jazzvamuto?19:09
Jazzvanope...19:09
Jazzvaasac, nspluginwrapper sucks in intrepid (at least for me). I lost sound in flash videos, and after every close of the window, firefox hangs.19:12
gnomefreakasac: update on sunbird hacking? also should i go to revu/motu to get extensions pushed. either way email me any answers i have to get to work looks like customers engine is here.19:14
Jazzvaok, that was some hanged npviewer.bin process19:14
asacmconnor: yes. two more needs discussion bugs for xulrunner ... except you really want me to file stuff for things we dropped because they are fixed in 1.9.119:46
Jazzvaasac, nspluginwrapper in intrepid works ok, it didn't hang on playing around with flash. the same is in jaunty, though it doesn't play sound when I have rhythmbox open, but that might be because of chroot (?)19:48
mconnorasac: mmm, I had like 12 ND things :)19:48
mconnorasac: plus all of the "3.0 only" stuff we should be getting filed as well19:48
mconnorasac: I want your patchset to be < 10 things, makes everyone's lives easier19:49
asacyes. approved things will be easier19:50
asacmconnor: http://pastebin.com/m7ceeac52 ... thats the status of 1.9.119:50
asac(xulrunner)19:50
mconnorthat's so much smaller!19:50
asacnote: bz466923 is the branding  thing ... currnelty the one with all the numbers19:50
asacmconnor: bzXXX_urlclassifier_prefs_in_toolkit.patch ... thats rejected, but should be needs discussion or approved. its above moving esential urlclassifier prefs to toolkit19:51
mconnorprotect tests thing should go upstream19:51
mconnorasac: oh, yeah19:52
asacmconnor: yes. i think you already said that on the round 119:52
mconnorhaven't fixed the web version19:52
mconnorasac: just not sure what "Approved" means there :)19:52
asacmconnor: can we add a row (fixed or not on 1.9.1)19:52
mconnoryeah, can do19:52
asacmconnor: approved like in Approved for 3.0 ;)19:52
mconnorok19:52
asacJazzva: are you subscried to nspluginwrapper list?19:54
Jazzvanope...19:54
asacok i will try to forward important ones to mt list19:55
Jazzvaok, i can subscribe to it now, for future updates19:55
asacJazzva: maybe look the archive for novemenber and december19:59
Jazzvaok19:59
asacthey discuss the fedora patches on top fo 1.1.8 there19:59
asacJazzva: can you push the nspluginrapper.ubuntu branch?20:03
JazzvaI think I did20:03
asacok20:03
asaclet me check20:03
Jazzvaasac, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu20:04
asacJazzva: actually ... a good thing is to name the submission branch not like the main branch (ubuntu), but like the topic it tries to do ... so you could have named this 1.1.820:31
asacin that way you can jjust mark it merged and next time there is a new name available because the topic is new ;)20:32
asacfta: are you using the soname fixed nss/nspr in your ppa? did it break anything so far?20:37
asacor all thumbs up from your side?20:37
asac(i want to get rid of this sticky thing ) ;)20:37
Jazzvaasac: ok, noted for the next time :)20:51
Jazzvabtw, asac, maybe we could apply this patch http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/nspluginwrapper/devel/nspluginwrapper-1.1.8-fix-invalid-RPC-after-NPP_Destroy.patch?view=markup20:52
Jazzvathe changelog entries are dated after the last revision.20:53
Jazzvawhat do you think?20:53
mconnorhmm21:16
mconnorwhat days is UDS?21:16
Jazzvamconnor, 8-12. december, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDSJaunty21:16
mconnorhuh, a part of the google campus I've never seen21:17
ftastevel, apparently, sb fails in my ppa: http://paste.ubuntu.com/80016/21:32
ftastevel, but it worked locally...21:32
ftaseems like i missed tabBrowserCompat.xml21:33
stevellooks that way21:33
ftait's there but not as /build/buildd/songbird-1.0.0+0/build-tree/songbird/app/content/bindings/content/songbird/bindings//build/buildd/songbird-1.0.0+0/build-tree/songbird/app/content/bindings/browser/tabBrowserCompat.xml21:42
ftanote the duplicate21:43
ftalooks like a bug to me. a $(notdir) missing21:43
ftastevel, ^^21:43
stevelinteresting. what's different about the PPA that building there fails vs. locally?21:47
stevelthis is the first time i've heard of a build failure there21:47
* stevel wonders if make-jars is doing something wrong21:48
ftathe builder is different but make-jars should behave the same, it clearly didn't21:49
Jazzvaasac, I took a look the patch that I thought we could apply, but it seems that it is contained in revision 783, which we pulled. So, I think nspluginwrapper is good to go22:08
stevelfta: can you chekc the app/content/bindings/jar.mn and pastebin that?22:13
ftaasac, [Tue 21:16] <fta> asac, seems like you arrive in SFO ~30min after me. want to share the taxi/shuttle/whatever?22:14
ftastevel, hold on, i trashed my tree earlier today, to help the #lp guys. I'm rebuilding from scratch22:15
stevelfta: 'k22:15
ftadoing xul right now22:15
stevelfta: when do you guys arrive @ SFO?22:15
ftasaturday22:15
stevelhrm, what time? i may be able to give you guys a ride22:16
ftame: 6 Dec 12:55, asac 6 Dec 13:3322:17
ftahttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDSJaunty/Attendees22:17
armin76do i go as well? :D22:18
stevelah.. i'll be coming by earlier in the morning so i can make it to fosscamp. n/m :(22:18
ftanp22:21
ftacrimsun, E: asyncmsgq.c: Assertion 'pa_asyncq_push(a->asyncq, &i, TRUE) == 0' failed at pulsecore/asyncmsgq.c:164, function pa_asyncmsgq_send(). Aborting.22:21
=== rzr is now known as rZr
ftastevel, http://paste.ubuntu.com/80059/22:46
ftaclearly bad22:46
ftaoh, and now, it fails locally too22:47
ftawtf???22:47
ftathe only thing i changed in 1.0.0 => 1.0.0+022:48
ftahmm, a perl script. "+" has a meaning if regexps are involved22:50
stevelyeah - it's one or more22:51
ftai know :)22:51
ftait's in expand-jar-mn.pl22:53
steveldoh22:56
fta  DB<2> p $source_path22:57
fta /src/bzr/build-area/songbird-1.0.0+0/build-tree/songbird/app/content/bindings22:57
ftamain::(/src/bzr/build-area/songbird-1.0.0+0/build-tree/songbird/tools/scripts/expand-jar-mn.pl:90):22:57
fta90:           $file =~ s/$source_path\///;22:57
fta  DB<3> p $file22:57
fta /src/bzr/build-area/songbird-1.0.0+0/build-tree/songbird/app/content/bindings/addOnBundle.xml22:57
ftayou need to espace $source_path there22:58
stevelfta: can you try "$source_path = quotemeta $sourcepath" before that line and see if that fixes it for you?22:59
stevelmaybe we should just use str_replace there instead23:03
steveloh wait that's not standard perl n/m23:05
ftastevel, $file =~ s/\Q$source_path\E\///; is enough23:10
ftajust \Q and \E23:10
stevelcool23:11
ftastevel, please fix it on your side, i don't know if you updated your patch policy23:15
stevelwill do23:17
ftathanks23:17
sectechSomeone want to take a look at a launchpad bug and tell me what they think (If your part of the mozilla/firefox team), I am trying to triage bug #304942.23:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 304942 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox explodes to 1.2GB on simple URL." [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30494223:23
sectechAt first I thought something was kinda fishy about the bug itself... then I let the whole poorly coded html file to load and firefox sits with a 1GB memory usage level23:24
sectechand won't release it until you quit firefox23:24
ftastevel, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/songbird/songbird.head/annotate/49?file_id=fix_jar_expender_wit-20081203232207-wkw9u3bjzfsi74ik-123:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!