/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/12/06/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

chrisccoulsonLimCore - I'm unfortunate enough to run the Nvidia drivers, and I don't experience any of your issues00:01
LimCorechrisccoulson: do you often switch VTs?00:01
chrisccoulsonquite often00:01
chrisccoulsonand i share the computer with fast-user-switching most of the time too00:02
chrisccoulsonso, multiple X sessions are open aswell00:02
* LimCore got an idea. brb 1 month :)00:02
chrisccoulsonlol00:02
chrisccoulsonwhen a user logs in to their session, what component is responsible for restoring that users chosen screen resolution?00:03
chrisccoulsonis it gnome-settings-daemon?00:03
james_wchrisccoulson: it is00:07
james_wchrisccoulson: if that resolution was set with the screen resolution capplet00:07
Hobbseechrisccoulson: could be kde-specific, incidently00:07
chrisccoulsonthanks james_w, i thought it might be the case00:07
chrisccoulsoni was just looking at bug 305604, where the reporter says that opening a failsafe session should use the default resolution. i wasn't sure if that would be a gnome-session or a g-s-d request though (or both)00:09
chrisccoulsonwhat happened to ubottu?00:10
PiciIt'll be back in a moment.00:10
chrisccoulsonthanks:)00:11
chrisccoulsonjames_w - i was thinking about the PK and LTSP issues earlier. Perhaps the real problem is that the default policy is too restrictive00:12
chrisccoulsonfor example, i can appreciate why its necessary to restrict actions such as shutting down the machine to users on the active console, but i'm not sure why it's necessary to restrict adminstrators from changing settings (ie, with users-admin) when they're logged in remotely (ie, with LTSP)00:13
james_wchrisccoulson: can that distinction be represented in PK?00:15
chrisccoulsoni think so. for example, the policy for changing system settings could be set to "Admin Authentication" for active console, console and anyone. This would allow administrators to authenticate using PK whether they were on the local machine or logged in remotely.00:17
chrisccoulsonthat would be similar to pre-policykit days00:17
chrisccoulsonbut you could keep the policy for other actions (such as shutting down the machine) as they are now#00:17
chrisccoulsonperhaps i should bring this up on one of the mailing lists for discussion?00:18
james_wchrisccoulson: I think sending a mail would be a good idea00:24
chrisccoulsonthanks, i'll do that in the morning00:25
chrisccoulsonwhen i'm slightly more awake!00:25
james_w:-)00:25
=== sectech_ is now known as sectech
pckchemWhats the package that handles the login screen?01:38
pckchemnm, found it.01:42
zirodayHi, what more information is needed to mark https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/116752 as triaged or confirmed?01:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 116752 in linux-source-2.6.20 "Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason a0 on CPU 0" [Undecided,Won't fix]01:44
pckchemziroday: Lemme look01:46
zirodaypckchem: any ideas?01:48
pckchempckchem: Trying to figure out which part of the kernel is causing this...01:49
pckchemziroday: Wow, never done that typo before.01:50
zirodaypckchem: any info it needs? About to upload everything needed listed in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelOops however this does not appear to be a kernel oops01:50
pckchemziroday: Give me a second, and no it isn't really an OOPs.. You tend to notice those...01:51
pckchemziroday: Yeah, from what I can tell, there isn't enough information to figure out whats causing the problem. It needs general kernel debugging first.01:55
zirodaypckchem: link?01:55
pckchemziroday: The Minimal information section on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies should be enough01:55
pckchemto at least get started01:55
zirodaypckchem: shall read, thanks01:55
=== ziroday` is now known as ziroday
macoshould this be considered a bug? if i go to users-admin and hit Unlock, then i ignore the gksu box for a few moments to do something else, an authentication error box comes up even though i haven't done anything. entering the correct password in the still-open gksu box just closes that window and does not authenticate at all.  i assume it's some sort of timeout?04:56
macoit says "Could not authenticate. An unexpected error has occurred." and that comes up on subsequent clicks of the Unlock button04:57
pckchemhmm, let me see if it happens to me04:58
macoim on intrepid04:59
pckchemGood, me too.04:59
pckchemHmm, yep happens to me too04:59
pckchemThis *might* be intentional behavior, but I don't know enough to confirm05:00
macothe fact that it keeps doing it on clicks of the Unlock button later til you exit and reopen the app is *annoying*05:01
pckchemHaha, yeah I could see that, but when you enter the right password it goes away.05:02
pckchemArguably, nobody else but the sysadmin should be unlocking that interface, because it lets you reset the root password05:02
macowhen i entered the right password, the password box went away, but it didnt unlock05:02
macoand then hitting unlock wouldnt bring the password box back at all05:03
pckchemReally? Mine unlocked....05:05
macoi can try again...maybe i messed the password...05:06
pckchemI only get that authentication error if I ignore the box, or I close it after I ignore it.05:06
maconope tried again05:06
macoif i ignore the box, i get the authentication error05:07
macothen i close the error and the password box stays open05:07
macoi put the password in, and it doesn't unlock05:07
macoif i put the password in before the authentication error comes up, it unlocks fine05:07
pckchemOk, wait thats not how I did it, let me try again05:07
pckchemWow, OK yeah, If i do it that way i can reproduce05:09
macook...im gonna file this then05:09
pckchemIf you want to write up a bug report I'll confirm it for you. Seems pretty easy to reproduce05:09
macohm should check with another policykit app05:09
macoer, what else uses PK?05:10
pckchemservices05:10
pckchemalmost the whole admin menu actually...05:11
macoreally? i just installed intrepid 2 days ago. so i only know what uses it in hardy :P05:11
macologin window does not use PK05:11
* maco waits to see if Services times...oh there it is05:12
macoyah, same in Services05:13
pckchemOk, by almost the whole thing, I mean services, users, time05:13
macohaha05:13
pckchem<- Sorry I'm trying to overclock my vista box at the same time.05:14
pckchemYou DON'T want to mess up while inserting a FSB Freq...05:14
pckchemI swear there is more though...05:17
macopckchem: ah, its already filed bug 20118405:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 201184 in policykit "Unlocking administration tool gives an unexpected error" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20118405:37
macoit was filed a while ago...05:37
macoim gonna hit the Me Too05:38
pckchemme tood and escalated to medium importance since its a core util. Thanks for writing that up.05:48
macopckchem: i didnt write it up. it was filed in march05:48
pckchemWhoa, didn't look at the date.05:49
macohrm, i feel like using an OOo icon to represent a .glade file is a little um, odd05:50
calcmaco: eh, why is it doing that?06:00
macostupidity?06:00
macoi have a .glade on my desktop and it shows the OOo Document icon06:00
pckchemwhat is .glade supposed to be mapped to?06:03
pckchem<- get same thing06:03
tcoleglade06:04
tcoleit's a Gtk UI builder06:04
pckchemHmm, maybe the xml is similar enough?06:06
pckchemNope, just set that way. Ubuntu knows its a glade project.06:06
pckchem*shrug(06:06
maco:-/ Intrepid's OOo 2.4 displays files differently than Hardy's OOo 2.406:07
calc  <generic-icon name="x-office-document"/>06:08
calcthats why apparently06:08
calcx-glade mimetype uses the x-office-document icon06:08
calcthis is under /usr/share/mime/06:09
macooh. i think itd make sense if it showed glade's logo06:09
calcwell yea i think it probably shouldn't use that icon06:09
calcin any case its not OOo that is screwing it up, whatever created that association needs to be improved though06:11
calcit looks like it might be in shared-mime-info06:11
macooh, i figured it wasnt OOo06:12
macobut i didnt know what decided which icon to use. i was guessing gnome and kde probably had different ways of doing it06:13
* calc is in charge of OOo which was why he was checking it out to make sure it wasn't somehow at fault06:13
macoah ok06:14
PietVanraadLet's say I've found a bug, how do I go about fixing it, how to get the source of a package, how do I edit (this I probably can), how do I recompile and rerun and how do I produce a patch?09:13
macoPietVanraad: apt-get source <package>09:20
macothen make your changes09:20
macoget the debhelper scripts installed09:20
macoand do "dch -i" in the source directory and itll take you to edit the changelog. then you can recreate the new source package with "debuild -S -sa" and use pbuilder to build a binary package. install the binary to test it. if it works, yay!09:21
macothen to make a debdiff, run, from the directory where the .orig.gz and all are: debdiff old-package.dsc new-package.dsc09:22
macothe debdiff is the patch you attach to the bug09:22
PietVanraadwow, thanks a lot, I'll copy past that! very helpfull09:23
macoask someone else how to use pbuilder though. i had help setting mine up and now i forget how09:24
=== Fallenou[oqp] is now known as Fallenou
=== lacqui_ is now known as lacqui
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!