=== Elbrus is now known as Guest52612
=== paul__ is now known as Elbrus
[02:56] <andresmujica1> wouldn't be nice if i could mark a bug as duplicate of another one and all the duplicated bugs from the first bug where marked automagically as dupes from the main bug?
[05:05] <hggdh> yes, and I think this is a bug on Malone, already
[05:10] <andresmujica> oh yea, that would be sweet
[05:11] <andresmujica> also i would like to see ia way to mark bugs as related to other bugs, not duplicates but related, so a developer can get an overview a better perspective...
=== ajmorris_ is now known as ajmorris
[12:34] <anakron> Hi all
[12:34] <anakron> in which file i can add or remove recommended packages?
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
=== nhandler1 is now known as nhandler
[16:18] <test34> What does "BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper" mean in /var/log/syslog ? it happens when I turn ON my bluetooth headset..
[16:19] <test34> complete output at http://pastebin.com/f79233ca6
[16:35] <milos_> what package is responsible for sound effects in ubuntu?
=== dodger__ is now known as Hurtz
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
[20:04] <MrKanister> Hi there. Can somebody set this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/290194) to wishlist?
[20:04] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 290194 in firefox "[feature-request]: Restrict auto-completion feature in Firefox url-bar for different domains" [Undecided,New]
[20:05] <crimsun> MrKanister: done.
[20:06] <MrKanister> crimsun: Thank you.
[20:07] <crimsun> np
[21:00] <torkiano> is this bug triaged correctly? bug 38988
[21:00] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 38988 in mozilla-thunderbird "[wishlist] thread scoring rules" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38988
[21:00] <kbrooks> Um
[21:00] <kbrooks> I have a poblem here.
[21:04] <kbrooks> I start Pidgin
[21:04] <kbrooks> Connect
[21:04] <kbrooks> Chat to someone
[21:04] <kbrooks> Switch to another app
[21:04] <kbrooks> Switch back
[21:05] <kbrooks> Pidgin freezes
[21:29] <charlie-tca> torkiano: You could ask asac, he´s the triager on it. I would expect it is, if he did it.
[21:32] <torkiano> charlie-tca: ok, i ask him
[21:34] <torkiano> charlie-tca: but is better forward this bug to mozilla? i'm lerning ;-)
[21:35] <charlie-tca> did you talk to asac?
[21:36] <charlie-tca> asac: ping
[21:38] <charlie-tca> torkiano: I did not notice the date on that! It´s pretty old now. Perhaps asking if it is still valid would be a good place to start
[21:38] <charlie-tca> Sorry (:
[21:40] <torkiano> charlie-tca: no problem ;-), i ask for it, thank you
[21:40] <charlie-tca> You are welcome. Good luck with triaging!
[21:42] <torkiano> charlie-tca: I'm closing old untouched bugs. I hope do it well...
[21:42] <charlie-tca> All you can do it try your best. If you have questions, ask here. Someone will help
[21:46] <torkiano> ok charlie-tca, i'm only close old incomplete bugs without response; they are more easy ;-)
[21:47] <charlie-tca> Good place to start. It gets you some experience, right?
[22:15] <Elbrus> torkiano: I don't think you need to close incomplete bugs
[22:15] <Elbrus> they are moved "out of the way" after 60 days
[22:16] <Elbrus> so marking a bug incomplete after a final plee for information is the most appropriate action IIUC.
[22:17] <hacktick1> Elbrus: but arent there old incomplete bugs which dont expire?
[22:17] <torkiano> Elbrus: thank you for the tip, i dont't know that
[22:18] <Elbrus> yah, but I don't think much people look at those, as they are archived... again, if I understand correctly
[22:18] <Elbrus> but that's how I see it
[22:18] <Elbrus> it is good to keep the bugs if they are not solved, better than closing
[22:19] <Elbrus> that's where incomplete IS for
[22:20] <Elbrus> without deliberately asking for old bugs they don't show up in overviews anyway
[22:21] <torkiano> In (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Incomplete bugs without a response from submitter ) say that  a bug in the "Incomplete" state for more than 4 weeks should be changed to "Invalid"
[22:36] <Elbrus> torkiano: ok, I guess that might be a matter of opinion. just make sure if you do that you give the explanation as given in the url.
[22:38] <test34> I experienced a kernel bug with the latest Ubuntu-2.6.27-9.19 kernel but not with the latest kernel v2.6.27.8
[22:39] <Elbrus> torkiano: good link by the way, helps me too. Thanks
[22:39] <Elbrus> test34: have you filed a bug?
[22:40] <test34> not yet.. what should I post, the syslog ?
[22:40] <torkiano> Elbrus: ;-)
[22:42] <Elbrus> test34: I don't know exactly, what is the experience? You can start with the bug and describe as best as you can and ask if they need more files
[22:43] <test34> ok
[22:43] <Elbrus> and provide files that you think are relevant
[22:43] <Elbrus> so if you see anything relevant in the syslog that will help
[22:43] <Elbrus> by the way: attach, not include in the report
[22:43] <test34> ok thanks
[22:44] <Elbrus> if you want more help afterwards, you could come back here and write bug <number> here and ask for more help
=== ajmorris_ is now known as ajmorris
[23:20] <payload1> hi. i noticed that when purging firefox-3.0 you can still see firefox in gconf /desktop/gnome/url-handler/*
[23:20] <payload1> same for evolution
[23:21] <payload1> installing lynx an galeon or thunderbird
[23:21] <payload1> didnt replaced that
[23:23] <payload1> am i right at filing bug reports for each of      firefox-3.0, evolution, lynx, galeon and thunderbird    or could i file a report which says that this is maybe a general problem and should be checked for each and every package which should or have to modify   url-handlers  ??
[23:59] <Elbrus> payload1: if I am correct you can file 1 bug and use the "also affects" button to tag the other packages