[04:32] <MTecknology> Anybody around that knows anything about the new plugins to let sites use LP as the authentication provider?
[04:38] <jml> a little.
[04:38] <jml> MTecknology: Launchpad is an OpenID provider.
[04:38] <MTecknology> jml: I want it to pass back the name/email of the person that's authenticating
[04:39] <jml> MTecknology: I *think* you'd have to authenticate, and then look up their name/email using the Launchpad APIs.
[04:39] <MTecknology> I should be setup to do it, but I don't know how to set it up on my side
[04:39] <jml> MTecknology: but we are pushing the boundaries of my ignorance here.
[04:40] <MTecknology> http://news.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/new-launchpad-plugins-for-drupal
[04:40] <MTecknology> this is what I'm referring to. I think we're on different pages
[04:40] <jml> oh, when you said "new plugins", you meant "new Drupal plugins" :)
[04:40] <MTecknology> ya
[04:41] <jml> yeah, so, nil speako the Drupal
[04:41] <spiv> I don't think Launchpad provides attributes like the email address to OpenID relying parties (yet?)
[04:41] <MTecknology> ya
[04:41] <MTecknology> h on
[04:42] <MTecknology> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/53961
[04:44] <spiv> Ah, so we apparently do allow some sites to get more details.  In that case filing a question at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad asking for your site to be allowed to get those details, like 53961, is probably what you need to do.
[04:44] <MTecknology> so I just need to wait?
[04:45] <MTecknology> spiv: I was guessing I needed to set something else up on my side to request those pieces of information.
[04:46] <spiv> Oh, that is your question already.
[04:46]  * spiv slowly catches up
[04:47] <spiv> I know nothing about the drupal plugin, sorry.  So either wait, or wait in here/ask again here in a few hours, when different (and hopefully more knowledgeable) people are online.
[04:47] <MTecknology> what tz are most of them in?
[04:47] <spiv> All of them, more or less ;)
[04:48] <MTecknology> I wonder if I'll ever manage to get a canonical hostmask
[04:48] <spiv> There's probably a disproportiate number on US west coast time this week due to UDS.
[04:48] <MTecknology> I want to make it to one of those... someday... maybe
[04:50] <MTecknology> This module is incredibly awesome, but I'd also like to make it so users never notice their user account is bing created
[04:50] <MTecknology> It's a heck an awesome feature
[04:50] <MTecknology> I still need to finish making my theme
[04:53] <\sh> MTecknology: could be that I'm mistaken, but when you are talking about the drupal openid plugins, you can't mix up "authentication" with "drupal accounts". For Drupal, it needs to create the accounts, for "Authorization" stuff, which doesn't belong to openid in general. openid is only for authentication (afaik) :)
[04:54] <MTecknology> oh...
[04:55] <MTecknology> I thought it was able to pass the name and email back (i know it can do that part) so the user doesn't need to enter them.
[04:55] <MTecknology> I know it has the ability to keep the email addys in sync between the user on lp and the site
[04:58] <\sh> MTecknology: not knowing the lp drupal5 plugins, but using lp as openid provider with drupal6 gives you the email + username (in my case my email and "shermann", the last time I checked)...but this is something users don't want in general...and that's why drupal6 has the possibility to add an openid to a drupal6 user account
[04:59] <MTecknology> but they also have to enter their openid string last i knew
[05:00] <MTecknology> I spent 20hr switching from 6 to 5 to be able to use these plugins and I'm still not done with the theme :P
[05:00] <\sh> MTecknology: with a working openid plugin you just need your openid string for authentication...(login)...
[05:00] <MTecknology> ya
[05:00] <\sh> MTecknology: 6 has openid plugin implemented
[05:01] <MTecknology> ya, I was using that but I wanted more functionality. You should see my computer...
[05:01] <MTecknology> these new plugins have exactly what I want, I just need to figure out how to use them right
[05:03] <MTecknology> \sh: I'm not trying to complain about what 6 offers, but what they (idk who exactly) did for 5 is beyond incredible.
[05:08] <\sh> MTecknology: yeah..launchpad devs are smart ,-)
[05:08] <MTecknology> yup
[05:48] <rockstar> \sh, how many launchpad devs do you know, exactly?
[05:56]  * MTecknology wishes kiko was around to pester
[06:05] <rockstar> MTecknology, is there something specific you need?
[06:05] <MTecknology> rockstar: the name and email
[06:05] <MTecknology> not user name
[06:05] <rockstar> MTecknology, of what?
[06:05] <MTecknology> err, the user name
[06:05] <MTecknology> rockstar: from their LP account
[06:06] <rockstar> Whose LP account?
[06:06] <MTecknology> whoever is in my team
[06:06]  * rockstar reads backchat.
[06:06] <MTecknology> I'm using the plugins that were released today for drupal
[06:10] <MTecknology> rockstar: lemme know if I'm not making any sense
[06:10] <rockstar> MTecknology, I know nothing about those.  Sorry.
[06:10] <MTecknology> ok, ty
[06:10]  * rockstar did not go to UDS, so only hears the residuals...
[06:11] <MTecknology> i wish i could
[06:11] <Hobbsee> don't think it was mentioend at UDS, as such
[06:11] <Hobbsee> if it was, i missed it
[06:12] <MTecknology> bbl
[06:12] <MTecknology> Hobbsee: hi
[06:12] <MTecknology> ttyl
[06:12] <cody-somerville> IT was on the planet
[06:12] <Hobbsee> hey MTecknology
[06:12] <cody-somerville> http://news.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/new-launchpad-plugins-for-drupal
[06:13] <MTecknology> yup, that's where I got it from
[06:13] <MTecknology> gtg
[06:57] <MTecknology> Hobbsee: how'd your day go?
[15:33] <epsy> hm, I just sent a message to lpbugs containing " milestone 0.2.8.3". The milestone set in the bug changed but " milestone 0.2.8.3" appears as a new comment
[15:35] <matsubara> epsy: I think that's the correct behavior. when you edit a bug using the email interface, the email with commands is added as a comment to the report
[15:40] <epsy> aren't commands supposed to be stripped?
[15:44] <matsubara> epsy: nope
[15:49] <epsy> that's not very clear on https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface
[15:49] <epsy> in fact, it does even suggest the opposite
[15:49] <epsy> notably here: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface#On%20success
[15:52] <matsubara> epsy: could you file a bug about it please?
[15:52] <epsy> in documentation or in malone?
[15:55] <matsubara> epsy: launchpad.net/launchpad-documentation/+filebug
[15:57] <matsubara> epsy: you might want to "affects me too" bug 3927
[15:58] <epsy> well, I got nothing against this
[16:11] <snuitje> Hi, i was trying to file a bug report but i got an error: "Request Entity Too Large"
[16:11] <snuitje> that's with an 1-byte file attached, without it i get the error "cannot upload empty file"
[16:12] <snuitje> so i tried disabling the redirection to edge, but it seems still to be redirecting
[16:12] <epsy> what browser are you using? is the "cannot upload empty file" error modal or not?
[16:12] <snuitje> also when i comment on a bug it gives the same "cannot upload empty file" error
[16:13] <snuitje> I'm using epiphany with webkit
[16:13] <snuitje> the error isn't modal (as in a separate dialog) but it's blocking
[16:15] <Ursinha> snuitje, you didn't get any oopses?
[16:16] <snuitje> i don't know what you mean, so i think not
[16:16] <Ursinha> snuitje, oh, it's when launchpad shows you a page saying "Oops! Something went wrong.."
[16:16] <snuitje> nope, i didn't get that
[16:17] <Ursinha> right
[16:17] <Ursinha> snuitje, you couldn't file the bug?
[16:18] <snuitje> indeed, that's why i came here =)
[16:18] <Ursinha> :)
[16:20] <epsy> matsubara, Bug #307202
[16:22] <matsubara> thanks epsy
[16:23] <matsubara> snuitje: using the api or the web interface?
[16:23] <matsubara> ah sorry, missed the "using epiphany with webkit"
[16:23] <snuitje> ^_^
[16:23] <matsubara> so, it's using the web interface :-)
[16:24] <snuitje> yep :)
[17:03] <snuitje> matsubara: changing bug details does work, including adding the optional comment along with it
[17:04] <gustavonarea> Hello. Would it be possible to add the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) to https://launchpad.net/projects/+new ? "Affero GPL" is another license
[17:05] <matsubara> snuitje: can you show me a screenshot of the error you get?
[17:05] <snuitje> certainly
[17:10] <snuitje> can i email them?
[17:13] <snuitje> hmm it could be a bug in epiphany-webkit
[17:14] <matsubara> snuitje: that's what I'm suspecting. please mail it to me: matsubara@canonical.com
[17:16] <LarstiQ> gustavonarea: I suspect filing that as a question in the Launchpad answers section is the best approach.
[17:16] <gustavonarea> LarstiQ: I will, thanks :)
[17:16] <LarstiQ> gustavonarea: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[17:36] <Nikow> hello
[17:37] <Nikow> Is any possibility to get username of person who not logged in to launchpd for long time
[17:37] <Nikow> ?
[20:30] <Grom> hello
[20:31] <Grom> can I capture login on freenode hen user is not logged in on launchpad for long time?
[20:31] <Grom> freenode = launchpad
[20:32] <mwhudson> in general, no
[21:00] <S-i-A> hi all
[21:01] <S-i-A> we have some problem in rosetta, every one from rosetta her?
[21:05] <S-i-A> wordpress 2.7 updated and i will import the old version 2.6 to it. also downloaded the .po file from wp2.6 in launchpad and check it with msgfmt -C found this errors. my question is"why worked file from Launchpad have so many errors?" we have translated clear.
[21:06] <S-i-A> this errors http://paste.debian.net/23416/
[21:06] <MTecknology> So... I need an expert opinion. My website is sdloco.profarius.com. I need to know what to do with the copyright on the bottom. I don't know if I should put the year in or not or if it's a bad idea to have it on my site.
[21:07] <kfogel> MTecknology: I'm new to this channel, but your question looks to me like it might be off-topic here.
[21:07] <vvinet> I second kfogel on that statement
[21:08] <MTecknology> It is, but I don't know anywhere else where canonical guys really hang out
[21:08] <S-i-A> also if anyone from Rosetta her i NEED review https://translations.launchpad.net/wordpress/2.7/+imports
[21:09] <MTecknology> #canonical doesn't exist anymore
[21:10] <MTecknology> If anybody can give me an answer or point me where to get one, I'd really appreciate it.
[21:11] <cody-somerville> MTecknology, e-mail trademark@canonical.com
[21:11] <MTecknology> ty
[21:15] <MTecknology> cody-somerville:  <trademark@canonical.com>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
[21:16] <MTecknology>     virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
[21:16] <MTecknology> sorry I thought that was one line
[21:19] <Nafallo> MTecknology: trademarks
[21:19] <MTecknology> I just read up on the thing some. Actually... I thin Canonical can benefit from my changes
[21:19] <MTecknology> Nafallo: ty
[21:19] <Nafallo> nw
[21:24] <btm> LP: #294965 has a remote watch for an upstream bugzilla bug at redhat which was 'closed upstream' (fixed). Under remote bug watches in the right column it says this in Launchpad, but at the top in the 'affects' table the bug watch changed it to 'invalid / unknown' which seems wrong. Should I file a bug about this somewhere?
[21:28] <kfogel> MTecknology: I'm such a newbie here that I'm not sure what the usual process is for presenting your changes to Canonical, but it would probably involve something a) filing a bug with a patch attached, or b) making a commit in bzr and then pushing the commit somewhere to be reviewed... Does any of this sound familiar?
[21:30]  * kfogel wouldn't be averse to anyone else answering his implied question if they can :-)
[21:34] <S-i-A> anyone from Rosetta team her?
[21:47] <spm> MTecknology: kfogel, my 2c educated guess: if it's a LP hosted project lodge either a Question or Bug report as approprite. If it's hosted code, you can easily create your own branch and in turn present that to the project managers - possibly by using the Contact User/Team feature to draw to their attention.
[21:47] <spm> If still, no joy, yell loudly and we'll find someone who can answer :-)
[21:48] <spm> S-i-A: the Rosetta folks usually aren't online for another 5+ hours
[21:48] <kfogel> spm: thx
[21:49] <spm> kfogel: np, did that hit your implied question as well? Am only on coffee #2 this morning so brain isn't fully firing yet. :-)
[21:51] <Nafallo> spm: you have V in Australia ;-)
[21:51] <kfogel> spm: oh, it put me in the right general direction.
[21:51] <Nafallo> spm: in a lot more varied colors on the cans then we do here :-)
[21:52] <spm> Nafallo: that went so far overhead I didn't even hear the whooshing noise :-) 'V'? Not the aliens invading earth TV show I'm assuming?
[21:53] <kfogel> spm: the question I'm getting at is sort of "What this the way we recommend people to submit changes around here?"  In some projects, they say post a patch on the mailing list; in others, they say create a bug tracker ticket (or use an existing one) and attach the proposed patch; etc, etc.  I'm guessing that LP might be different, and that its answer to that question would involve something about making a bzr branch, committing your cha
[21:53] <kfogel> nge, then pushing it up to a personal branch on the server.
[21:53] <Nafallo> spm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_(drink)
[21:53] <Nafallo> :-)
[21:53] <kfogel> Then putting that change into some kind of review system.
[21:53] <kfogel> spm: I'm probably using words wrongly, but you get the general idea.
[21:53] <spm> kfogel: yup - understood.
[22:00] <spm> kfogel: I guess with LP itself - most of it's components (aren't yet) open sourced, so fixes are... harder to input from external. Those bits that are OS, dunno - it depends - much like you suggest with the various projects. "Patches always accepted", LP itself is supposedly about making it easier for external folks to bring any collaboration into a project.
[22:01] <kfogel> spm: oh, my question is about the *mechanism* by which patches are accepted, that's all.
[22:01] <kfogel> I know they're accepted.  But do we want them to arrive by FedEx, or passenger pigeon, or... ? :-)
[22:01] <spm> :-)
[22:01] <spm> For me, I don't care - just SEND THEM!!! ;-)
[22:31] <kfogel> urgk.  When I am sitting a bzr ticket (306394) and I go to the lower right search box and enter "bzr log" and hit Search, it fails to list bug 211852 ("bzr log should accept multiple files") in the search results.
[22:31] <kfogel> thank you, ubottu
[22:31] <kfogel> (I feel ill, I think I'm coming down with ubottulism)
[22:31] <jml> :)
[22:33] <S-i-A> spm: which person is from Rosetta Team, i can add him to my list, if online send him the message.
[22:33] <jml> kfogel: if it's a change to Launchpad, just file a bug. (until it's freed up, then you can submit a patch)
[22:33] <spm> danilos: ^^
[22:34] <kfogel> jml: re my earlier question? (not the one just now, that is)
[22:34] <jml> kfogel: if it's a change to Bazaar, use 'bzr send' to send a patch to the bazaar mailing list.
[22:34] <jml> kfogel: yes, re your earlier question :)
[22:34] <kfogel> thx