[00:02] * Hobbsee prods LP with a big stick [00:02] hi [00:03] I finally managed to get my package uploaded to PPA and built, but it seems to be empty O.o [00:03] how long did you wait after it built? [00:03] or the package itself is emtpy? [00:04] the log file lists a lot of install processes, but non of the "installed files" ended up in the .deb [00:04] Here's the log: [00:04] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20392652/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.webcontentcontrol_1.1.8-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz [00:04] I waited a few minutes [00:04] the build process is rather short on my own pc [00:05] looks like your rules file is wrong. [00:06] binary-arch: build install [00:06] dh_testdir [00:06] dh_testroot [00:06] dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog [00:06] dh_installdocs [00:06] dh_installexamples [00:06] # dh_install [00:06] should I uncoment the last line? [00:06] how come debuild works? [00:07] here's the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~gchildcare/+archive [00:08] KIAaze, empty? [00:08] I can see all the debs [00:09] well, it only contains the doc (changelog, copyright, etc) [00:09] even /usr/bin is empty [00:09] right, then it's a problem wiuth the packaging [00:09] KIAaze: as Hobbsee your installation script is failing and thus producing useless debs [00:09] the orig.tar.gz seems ok [00:09] ./scripts/adapt_path.sh /usr/share/webcontentcontrol/scripts yourpath /build/buildd/webcontentcontrol-1.1.8/debian/webcontentcontrol/usr/share/webcontentcontrol/scripts / is NOT writable. Skipping steps requiring root permissions. [00:10] yes, but that shouldn't matter [00:10] the steps requiring root permission are changes to the config files of dansguardian+tinyproxy+firehol [00:13] ah ok [00:13] I think I found the problem [00:14] my previous release script called dh_make -a -n -s before calling debuild [00:14] must have added lots of files into the debian dir === sabdfl1 is now known as sabdfl [00:20] confirmed. debuild creates non-empty package now. [00:33] cprov: have you been doing interesting things again? [00:33] Connection failed, aborting. Check your network (111, 'Connection refused') [00:34] sounds like guilt. === sabdfl1 is now known as sabdfl [11:31] hi [11:32] the old file is imported in wordpress translation 2.7 but we must select all translated text again and click Save & Continue, why isn't automatic? === glade88_ is now known as glade88 [12:21] what package output do I use with dput to upload my package to my PPA? [12:58] et3: you mean you want the syntax for dput? [12:58] I use dput ppa *.changes [12:59] so and changes file works? [12:59] I don't understand, sorry [13:00] ppa is set in ~/.dput.cf [13:02] well, I was asking if 1386.changes and source.changes both work for dput uploading [13:02] for instance: md4sum_0.02.03-0ubuntu0~kolbyheacock1_i386.changes\ [13:05] well I think you can/should only upload source packages, so I guess it is the source.changes [13:27] can people join a mailing list of a team they're not a member of? [14:49] I made a launchpad oops #OOPS-1078H1803 while deleting a branch [14:49] https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/1078H1803 [14:49] er... yeah. that one. [14:49] Is it safe to try to delete again? [14:50] (going back to the branch, it said this: [14:50] Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted. Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted. Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted. Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted. Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted. Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.) === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [16:27] vadi2, it's a known bug [16:27] and it's fixed, will be released next wednesday \o/ [16:27] being unable to delete a branch? [16:27] alright [16:29] let me find the bug number [16:29] don't worry about it, I'll wait [16:33] :) [17:28] getting errors while trying to delete some of my project branches... OOPS-1078G1890 [17:28] https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/1078G1890 [18:04] can anyone tell me how i host hardy/intrepid packages on my PPA? [18:04] the "apt sources.list entries" only shows jaunty. not sure if i can still host hardy packages anyway [18:05] also the dput instructions say to upload the source. i assume there's a build farm over there? [18:13] MFen: Yes, there's a build farm. Once you upload packages targetted to hardy/intrepid then the sources list will show the other distros. [18:13] MFen: An example: https://launchpad.net/~ralcalc-team/+archive [18:14] MFen: Take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic#changelog and https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Versioning [18:15] oojah: ahhh. right, targets. it's been a while since i did any packaging [18:16] i use to maintain a package for debian, but it's rusty [18:17] MFen: there arae howtos for ppas on help.launchpad.net [18:21] thanks! [18:42] I';m having an issue with bzr, I try to add a directory and I'm getting this error - Format for file:///home/michael/Documents/LoCo/sdloco-5/themes/sdteam/.bzr/ is deprecated - please use 'bzr upgrade' to get better performance === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde [19:05] MTecknology: That's not an error. [19:05] It could probably be made more obvious. [19:06] wgrant: I JUST found the issue [19:06] Unfortunately all of the bzr devs seem to have left already. [19:06] I had an extra .bzr directory in there [19:09] wgrant: What does that message mean anyway? [19:09] left where? [19:09] in plan english kinda way? [19:09] It means precisely what it says. [19:09] The format is deprecated, please use 'bzr upgrade' to get better performance. [19:10] MTecknology: 'deprecated' has a meaning similar to 'obsolete' [19:10] oh, I did that to see if that would fix anything and it says that it's at the current revision [19:11] MTecknology: did you do 'upgrade', or 'update'? The latter is something else. [19:11] nope === sale_ is now known as sale [19:11] LarstiQ: It happened when doing an add [19:11] with an initial branch [19:12] hmm, no henninge. Is someone else on call? [19:15] LarstiQ: Why? [19:19] wgrant: to help find an admin who can purge revisions on launchpad. Unless push --overwrite also garbage collects? === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde [19:24] How do you get a project "Reviewed" ? [19:25] I just noticed everything in a project I just started working on says (Unreviewed) and I was wondering if that says anything negative about our project. [19:25] nevermind === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde === bureflux is now known as afflux === glade88 is now known as glade88|ZzZ === sale_ is now known as sale [23:03] launchpad logins appear to be broken; if I go to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/307318 it says I'm not logged in, if I click the 'Log in / Register' link and log in I still get the same result [23:03] Launchpad bug 307318 in pam "package libpam-runtime 1.0.1-4ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso dpkg-deb --control devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 2 I was updating an ubuntu installed in an usb key" [Undecided,New] [23:04] slangasek: fwiw, I seem to be logged in [23:08] ah, I seem to have disallowed cookies by mistake while clicking around in my firefox preferences; sorry for the noise then === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler