[00:02]  * Hobbsee prods LP with a big stick
[00:02] <KIAaze> hi
[00:03] <KIAaze> I finally managed to get my package uploaded to PPA and built, but it seems to be empty O.o
[00:03] <Hobbsee> how long did you wait after it built?
[00:03] <Hobbsee> or the package itself is emtpy?
[00:04] <KIAaze> the log file lists a lot of install processes, but non of the "installed files" ended up in the .deb
[00:04] <KIAaze> Here's the log:
[00:04] <KIAaze> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20392652/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.webcontentcontrol_1.1.8-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
[00:04] <KIAaze> I waited a few minutes
[00:04] <KIAaze> the build process is rather short on my own pc
[00:05] <Hobbsee> looks like your rules file is wrong.
[00:06] <KIAaze> binary-arch: build install
[00:06] <KIAaze> 	dh_testdir
[00:06] <KIAaze> 	dh_testroot
[00:06] <KIAaze> 	dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog
[00:06] <KIAaze> 	dh_installdocs
[00:06] <KIAaze> 	dh_installexamples
[00:06] <KIAaze> #	dh_install
[00:06] <KIAaze> should I uncoment the last line?
[00:06] <KIAaze> how come debuild works?
[00:07] <KIAaze> here's the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~gchildcare/+archive
[00:08] <beuno> KIAaze, empty?
[00:08] <beuno> I can see all the debs
[00:09] <KIAaze> well, it only contains the doc (changelog, copyright, etc)
[00:09] <KIAaze> even /usr/bin is empty
[00:09] <beuno> right, then it's a problem wiuth the packaging
[00:09] <cprov> KIAaze: as Hobbsee your installation script is failing and thus producing useless debs
[00:09] <KIAaze> the orig.tar.gz seems ok
[00:09] <cprov> ./scripts/adapt_path.sh /usr/share/webcontentcontrol/scripts yourpath /build/buildd/webcontentcontrol-1.1.8/debian/webcontentcontrol/usr/share/webcontentcontrol/scripts / is NOT writable. Skipping steps requiring root permissions.
[00:10] <KIAaze> yes, but that shouldn't matter
[00:10] <KIAaze> the steps requiring root permission are changes to the config files of dansguardian+tinyproxy+firehol
[00:13] <KIAaze> ah ok
[00:13] <KIAaze> I think I found the problem
[00:14] <KIAaze> my previous release script called dh_make -a -n -s before calling debuild
[00:14] <KIAaze> must have added lots of files into the debian dir
[00:20] <KIAaze> confirmed. debuild creates non-empty package now.
[00:33] <Hobbsee> cprov: have you been doing interesting things again?
[00:33] <Hobbsee> Connection failed, aborting. Check your network (111, 'Connection refused')
[00:34] <Hobbsee> sounds like guilt.
[11:31] <S-i-A> hi
[11:32] <S-i-A> the old file is imported in wordpress translation 2.7 but we must select all translated text again and click Save & Continue, why isn't automatic?
[12:21] <et3> what package output do I use with dput to upload my package to my PPA?
[12:58] <darius12> et3: you mean you want the syntax for dput?
[12:58] <darius12> I use dput ppa *.changes
[12:59] <et3> so and changes file works?
[12:59] <darius12> I don't understand, sorry
[13:00] <darius12> ppa is set in ~/.dput.cf
[13:02] <et3> well, I was asking if 1386.changes and source.changes both work for dput uploading
[13:02] <et3> for instance:  md4sum_0.02.03-0ubuntu0~kolbyheacock1_i386.changes\
[13:05] <darius12> well I think you can/should only upload source packages, so I guess it is the source.changes
[13:27] <qense> can people join a mailing list of a team they're not a member of?
[14:49] <vadi2> I made a launchpad oops #OOPS-1078H1803 while deleting a branch
[14:49] <vadi2> er... yeah. that one.
[14:49] <vadi2> Is it safe to try to delete again?
[14:50] <vadi2> (going back to the branch, it said this:
[14:50] <vadi2> Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.   Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.   Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.   Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.   Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.   Branch ~mudlet-makers/mudlet/docs deleted.)
[16:27] <Ursinha> vadi2, it's a known bug
[16:27] <Ursinha> and it's fixed, will be released next wednesday \o/
[16:27] <vadi2> being unable to delete a branch?
[16:27] <vadi2> alright
[16:29] <Ursinha> let me find the bug number
[16:29] <vadi2> don't worry about it, I'll wait
[16:33] <Ursinha> :)
[17:28] <viridior> getting errors while trying to delete some of my project branches... OOPS-1078G1890
[18:04] <MFen> can anyone tell me how i host hardy/intrepid packages on my PPA?
[18:04] <MFen> the "apt sources.list entries" only shows jaunty. not sure if i can still host hardy packages anyway
[18:05] <MFen> also the dput instructions say to upload the source. i assume there's a build farm over there?
[18:13] <oojah> MFen: Yes, there's a build farm. Once you upload packages targetted to hardy/intrepid then the sources list will show the other distros.
[18:13] <oojah> MFen: An example: https://launchpad.net/~ralcalc-team/+archive
[18:14] <oojah> MFen: Take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic#changelog and https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Versioning
[18:15] <MFen> oojah: ahhh. right, targets.  it's been a while since i did any packaging
[18:16] <MFen> i use to maintain a package for debian, but it's rusty
[18:17] <lifeless> MFen: there arae howtos for ppas on help.launchpad.net
[18:21] <MFen> thanks!
[18:42] <MTecknology> I';m having an issue with bzr, I try to add a directory and I'm getting this error - Format <RepositoryFormatKnit1> for file:///home/michael/Documents/LoCo/sdloco-5/themes/sdteam/.bzr/ is deprecated - please use 'bzr upgrade' to get better performance
[19:05] <wgrant> MTecknology: That's not an error.
[19:05] <wgrant> It could probably be made more obvious.
[19:06] <MTecknology> wgrant: I JUST found the issue
[19:06] <wgrant> Unfortunately all of the bzr devs seem to have left already.
[19:06] <MTecknology> I had an extra .bzr directory in there
[19:09] <MTecknology> wgrant: What does that message mean anyway?
[19:09] <LarstiQ> left where?
[19:09] <MTecknology> in plan english kinda way?
[19:09] <wgrant> It means precisely what it says.
[19:09] <wgrant> The format is deprecated, please use 'bzr upgrade' to get better performance.
[19:10] <Spads> MTecknology: 'deprecated' has a meaning similar to 'obsolete'
[19:10] <MTecknology> oh, I did that to see if that would fix anything and it says that it's at the current revision
[19:11] <LarstiQ> MTecknology: did you do 'upgrade', or 'update'? The latter is something else.
[19:11] <MTecknology> nope
[19:11] <MTecknology> LarstiQ: It happened when doing an add
[19:11] <MTecknology> with an initial branch
[19:12] <LarstiQ> hmm, no henninge. Is someone else on call?
[19:15] <wgrant> LarstiQ: Why?
[19:19] <LarstiQ> wgrant: to help find an admin who can purge revisions on launchpad. Unless push --overwrite also garbage collects?
[19:24] <MTecknology> How do you get a project "Reviewed" ?
[19:25] <MTecknology> I just noticed everything in a project I just started working on says (Unreviewed) and I was wondering if that says anything negative about our project.
[19:25] <MTecknology> nevermind
[23:03] <slangasek> launchpad logins appear to be broken; if I go to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/307318 it says I'm not logged in, if I click the 'Log in / Register' link and log in I still get the same result
[23:04] <LarstiQ> slangasek: fwiw, I seem to be logged in
[23:08] <slangasek> ah, I seem to have disallowed cookies by mistake while clicking around in my firefox preferences; sorry for the noise then