[01:08] what do you do with a bug that is requesting a change to the documentation on help.ubuntu.com website [01:10] duanedesign: assign it to the ubuntu-website [01:16] help.ubuntu.com is a wiki though right? [01:17] no [01:18] ah, only the commnity bit is [01:18] i think hel[.ubuntu.com/community is [01:18] if it is the front page its ubuntu-website [01:19] if it is about a release's documentation that would be ubuntu-docs(?) [01:19] er, help.ubuntu.com/communitty [01:22] duanedesign, what page are you filing against [01:23] you have a link to the report? [01:26] thank you very much for your help hggdh and pedro_ helped me. [01:27] I am new to bug triage, but eager to help. I appreciate all the help [01:27] well thank you for your support, we need all the help we can get [01:27] what bug were you talking about? I'm with the doc team as well, I'd be happy to have a look at it [01:28] 307582 [01:28] bug 307582 [01:28] Launchpad bug 307582 in ubuntu-docs "SRU: Bridging documentation in the JeOS VMBuilder documentation is wrong" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307582 [01:28] ty ubottu [01:30] lol i think you assigned it wrong duanedesign, you dont need to Assign To, people tend to use "assign" and "set package to" (aka Affects) interchangably [01:31] duanedesign, dealing with the doc team on LP is a little strange [01:31] ubuntu-websites looks like some random user, ubuntu-website is team [01:31] the bug is already filed correctly under ubuntu-docs though [01:32] duanedesign, i wont intrude on your bug since you're handling it, but you should go back and change "Assign to" to "Nobody" [01:32] ok [01:36] Rocket2DMn: what about assigning it to the Ubuntu documentation team [01:36] you dont need to do that, they are made aware of the bug. A team member can assign it to themself if they want to handle it [01:37] I understand [01:38] if a bug task is marked in progress but unassigned... is that right? [01:38] normally no [01:38] so as long as the package is set to ubuntu-docs on similar bug in the future there is nothing else to be done. [01:39] duanedesign, that's what I gather from the explanation Rocket2DMn gave [01:39] most bugs go unassigned to people [01:40] it just depends on the team really [02:02] should this just be marked duplicate and a comment asking the reporter to comment on the original bug? Bug 307173 [02:02] Launchpad bug 307173 in openoffice.org "In addition to Bug#306501" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307173 [02:04] looking at it [02:04] thanks [02:05] actually... yes, it seems to be a comment on the previous bug [02:06] ok so invalidate it and comment that that should be a comment [02:06] but the previous bug -- bug 306501 is wrongly assigned to openjdk-6 instead of ooo [02:06] Launchpad bug 306501 in openjdk-6 "OOo crashed with unexpectet JAVA Runtime error" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/306501 [02:07] ok, so I can mark the first one as invalid, comment and reassign this one to OOo? [02:07] Palintheus, you can copy the explanation the reporter gave on the second bug into the first, and close the new one as dup of the first [02:07] ah k [02:07] you just mark it as a dup of 306501 [02:07] and reassign the package to ooo [02:08] Palintheus, hold on [02:08] oh k [02:09] the reporter is correct: 306501 *is* a java sigsevg [02:09] and Java should not die with a sigsegv in the RTE [02:10] ok so don't reassign that one [02:10] no, please do not [02:10] wilco [02:11] so once a bug is marked as a duplicate you don't ahve to do anything else on it (status, assignment, etc)? [02:11] you should not. LP would automagically hide the duplicate from any search (unless you explicitly ask for dups) [02:12] awesome [02:14] ok, on this one (bug 307152) it appears work has been done on it but still new/unassigned does anything need to be done on it? [02:14] Launchpad bug 307152 in hplip "Get rid of .hplip folder and follow fd.o specifications" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307152 [02:15] questions I have, though: is the 'FaxAuftraege'a standard OOO function? [02:17] I think it should be left as is -- Till's expertise is printing [02:17] gotcha [02:34] ok, I found a bug that I know isn't a bug, so is it marked as invalid and a comment explaining why it's not a bug all that's done? Bug #306072 [02:34] Launchpad bug 306072 in firefox-3.0 "bookmark star does not add to list by clicking once" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/306072 [02:39] Palintheus, if it is not really a bug (I personally do not know, am new to FF, used to run epiphany), then yes. Explain why it is not a bug, and close invalid [02:39] and tell the reporter to reopen if not in agreement [02:40] k [03:54] what is the package that provides the default printing dialog, gnome-print? [03:55] no that musn't be right [03:56] or...it is and the package search is odd [04:09] okay, I filed bug 307621, would anyone mind Confirming it quickly in Firefox or otherwise? [04:09] Launchpad bug 307621 in gnome-print "Pressing enter key in print to file "Name" box does not print" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307621 [04:11] it looks like that will one may be changed to a feature request (wishlist), but I'm not completely sure [04:12] Palintheus: can you confirm the issue? [04:13] you could argue Low or Wishlist, the key difference is often whether or not the missing feature is reasonably expected [04:13] yeah, I confirmed that is what happens [04:13] for example if firefox didn't have a close button, that wouldn't be Wishlist :) [04:13] thanks! [12:08] is it just me, or is sox unusable, leaving ubuntu without any usable sound converting software apart from audacity (which is slow, crashable, and not so good for batch) [12:11] well, from RAW format to other formats. [12:15] sox man page is confusing, it need more examples. How this can be done? === Fallenou[oqp] is now known as Fallenou === Fallenou is now known as Fallenou_ === Fallenou_ is now known as Fallenou === dickydoo2 is now known as WelshDragon === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia [14:12] do we have triaging meetings? [14:14] You mean https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay ? [14:21] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/261473/comments/5 [14:21] Launchpad bug 261473 in dennis "Cheese video disappears when minimized or maximized" [High,Fix released] [14:21] it seems they are from moblin team. === WelshDragon is now known as Guest10435 [15:02] andresmujica, there are no formal triager meetings [15:02] (or, in another view, every day is a meeting) === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [17:32] are there any reasons why we would keep feisty bugs open? [17:33] or rather, any objections to me closing them? ;) === Guest10435 is now known as WelshDragon [20:05] anyone have some suggestions on what to do with these bugs, bug 288481 bug 288483 [20:05] Launchpad bug 288481 in firefox-3.0 "no cookies for pogo,comcast, i'm getting bloced out & i have stalling , error,s come's up all the time ,it shut's down sometime's " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/288481 [20:05] Launchpad bug 288483 in firefox-3.0 "no cookies for pogo,comcast, i'm getting bloced out & i have stalling , error,s come's up all the time ,it shut's down sometime's " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/288483 [20:11] Palintheus: What about marking one as the duplicate of teh other? [20:12] right, I figured that, but no clue as to what to do to the other [20:15] I'm not quite sure, but maybe converting it to a question would be a good idea [20:15] that's what I was thinking [20:21] There should be nothing wrong with that. For instructions have a lok at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/ConvertToQuestion [20:22] thanks [20:23] np === andre___ is now known as andre__ === bureflux is now known as afflux [22:30] can someone take a look at bug #307744 I think the Importance of the bug should be set to 'Wishlist' [22:30] Launchpad bug 307744 in kino "kino should notify if dvgrab is missing before attempting capture" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307744 [23:09] if a need-packaging bug marked as wishlist is asking a new version, but that version is already on the repos... fix released? (the bug is old... so obviously the new package is there) [23:26] I think the Importance of the bug should be set to 'Wishlist bug #307751 [23:26] Launchpad bug 307751 in evince "support comicbook formats: cb7, cba, cbt..." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307751 === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler