/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/12/13/#ubuntu-doc.txt

mdkeRocket2DMn: I can't figure out that bug you are experiencing. I guess you are missing the symbolic link at /usr/share/gnome/help/libs?15:44
Rocket2DMnhey mdke15:46
Rocket2DMni just ran across the bug report when i was triaging yesterday, and i was able to reproduce it15:46
* mdke nods15:46
Rocket2DMni didnt try to read very much into the output, let me have a look at the attachments i uploaded15:47
mdkeRocket2DMn: I've asked for the output of a couple more commands, if you have time15:47
Rocket2DMnsure let me wake up the laptop15:48
Rocket2DMnheh yeah that directory is empty15:49
mdkeit exists?15:49
mdkeit should be a symbolic link pointing at /usr/share/ubuntu-docs/libs15:50
Rocket2DMni just posted back, the directory exists but it is empty15:50
Rocket2DMnnegative, it is its own directory15:51
mdkehow bizarre15:51
mdkeI'm stumped about that15:52
Rocket2DMnthat laptop has been upgraded since Feisty15:52
mdkeaha...15:52
Rocket2DMnits always been to a stable release though, i dont use it for development testing15:53
mdkeI think that in gutsy and feisty that directory may not have been a symbolic link, so I guess what has happened is that it didn't get removed, and therefore the symbolic link can't be created15:53
Rocket2DMni see in Jaunty that it is a symlink15:54
mdkeit should be in Intrepid too15:54
Rocket2DMnits not a symlink in hardy15:54
mdkedoes it have files in it in hardy?15:55
Rocket2DMnyeah15:55
Rocket2DMnthey are symlinked though15:55
mdkeok, that must be the issue15:55
mdkei don't know how to fix that :)15:56
Rocket2DMnidk how updates are configured during upgrades, but i guess you need to run a command to check for a symlink, and if it doesnt exist, then delete the directory and create the link15:56
Rocket2DMnlike a bash script with some if/then statements15:56
mdkemaybe15:57
Rocket2DMni dont actually patch bugs for Ubuntu, i drew the line at triaging15:57
mdkeI'll ask one of the developers who knows all about packaging15:58
Rocket2DMnok, do you want me to post the source of problem to the bug report?15:58
mdkethanks for your help debugging that issue15:59
mdkeRocket2DMn: no, that's fine. I think the bug report has the right info now15:59
Rocket2DMnok, no problem15:59
Rocket2DMnand thank you for the testimonial last week15:59
mdkepleasure15:59
Rocket2DMndid you go to UDS Jaunty?16:00
mdkeno16:00
mdkeI've never been to a developer conference16:00
Rocket2DMni havent either, but i would loved to have gone to this one.  I was from the Bay Area, and I have a friend who works at Google, I could've gotten in no problem16:01
Rocket2DMndidnt think my company would fly my 3k miles for that though16:01
mdkeheh16:02
mdkeI can't really see myself getting the time off either16:02
Rocket2DMnyeah same, woulda been great if they could fly me out there and give me a charge number16:02
mdkeindeed16:03
Rocket2DMnapparently it was decided (or just announced) at UDS that the Forum Council can now approve Ubuntu Members16:03
mdkeok. I know it's been talked about for a bit16:03
mdkepersonally, I thoroughly disapprove of team councils being permitted to approve Ubuntu members, especially now that we have a great regional board system16:04
mdkeif team councils do it, you lose the benefit of contributors being seen by other areas of the community, because teams just appoint members from their own section of the community16:04
Rocket2DMnyeah, I think the idea was that it could be granted to outstanding contributors to the forums.16:05
Rocket2DMnhowever i do wish the forums were more integrated with the rest of the community, and having to go to regional boards is one way to encourage that16:05
mdkethat's exactly my point16:05
Rocket2DMnthere is discussion right now about how another mod and i who are currently on the regional board application list are going to go through the approval process.  i'm all for staying with the regional board, like everybody else does16:06
mdkeit's up to you :)16:06
Rocket2DMnwe'll figure it out soon, it would be nice if they set a date for the next meeting though16:07
j1mchi a16:09
j1mcall16:09
Rocket2DMnhello16:10
j1mcis there talk of a docteam meeting?16:12
mdkeno :)16:12
Rocket2DMnlol, we dont actually have many people who sit in this channel, and those that do dont speak16:13
j1mcyes, it's pretty rare16:13
mdkeI don't think we have had a meeting for a number of years now, it wouldn't be a bad idea16:13
Rocket2DMni would very much like to know what duncan lithgow was doing onthe community docs and how we can clean it up16:14
j1mci know that we had tried to coordinate a meeting during the hardy release, but couldn't work out schedules.16:16
j1mcit should be a busy doc cycle for me, as xfce needs new docs for xfce 4.616:17
mdkecool16:17
j1mcfortunately, work has mellowed out some for now.16:17
j1mcso not as many late nights.16:17
Rocket2DMnhehe, thats good16:18
* mdke ducks out for a bit16:19
j1mchave a good day, mdke16:19
Rocket2DMnsee ya mdke16:19
Rocket2DMnhmm CategoryX and CategoryXwindowSystem16:19

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!