[02:10] StevenK, what was the name of the spec that we talked about doing cross-installations of Ubuntu? (I'm trying to find it ATM) [02:10] Huh? Cross-installations? [02:10] The spec where you can install an ARM system from a x86/amd64 host [02:10] Using an ISO of the CD [02:11] That so wasn't it [02:11] Well, yes, that's why I'm trying to find it to refresh my memory :-P [02:11] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/specs/OfflineInstaller [02:12] Ah, that's it [02:12] Anyway, I took a peek at how emdebian handles package installation/removal [02:13] * StevenK goes for lunch [02:13] cya [13:44] OH !!! [13:44] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjkyNw [14:35] has this Ubuntu Mobile developer position been filled? http://webapps.ubuntu.com/employment/canonical_UMD [14:36] thebishop, filled positions get removed from the page :) [14:36] ah, nice [14:37] I don't have ARM experience, but i have done some hacking on PSP (MIPS), and PS3 (Cell), plus Ubuntu has been my primary development platform since the first release === crevette_ is now known as crevette [16:30] asac: Do you have the xulrunner-1.9 1.9.0.5 tarball already? [17:03] lool: currently copying to chinstrap:~asac/1.8.1.19/ffox/ [17:04] but its not yet out ;) [18:06] asac: Oh ok; I'll wait til it's public [18:06] lool: will you update the packaging branch? e.g. merge from .hardy? [18:07] let me do that for you [18:09] I did already [18:10] lool: great. seeing that. well done! [18:14] lool: a typo in the USN number :/ [18:15] lool: can you redo the merge when i uncommit or should i commit on top and "re-release"? [18:16] lool: pong ;) [18:16] err ping! [18:18] lool: ok committed on top and RE-RELEASED ;) [19:30] asac: Sorry was afk for dinner and bath [19:31] asac: I get no new rev here; I guess you didn't push yet [19:34] lool: hmm i have a bind ... let me check [19:34] lool: are you using lp:~... url for merging? or http? [19:34] lool: oh sorry. that was firefox ;) [19:34] so not for you [19:35] lool: check that USN is 690 [19:35] -1 [19:43] I guess I am still a little confused by all of the recent name changes. Getting a G1U CMXP, this would be mid or umpc? [19:48] s/G1U/Q1U/ [19:56] hey, so what's the magic to compile a new kernel on ubuntu mobile? fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd kernel_image kernel_headers exits with debian/ruleset/misc/checks.mk:36 "Error. I do not know where the kernel image goes to [kimagedest undefined] ..." [19:59] asac: ssh [19:59] asac: I thought you meant the mobile branch, but you meant yours [20:00] hmm no [20:00] ah... mid [20:00] asac: USN is correct in all cases [20:00] zackr: I'd check the ubuntu kernel wiki on the ubuntu wiki [20:04] lool: yea, i haven't seen anything there [20:09] http://www.google.fr/search?q=ubuntu+build+custom+kernel&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:fr:unofficial&client=firefox-a [20:09] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kernel/Compile [20:13] yes, that doesn't answer any of the questions. i don't know what arch/subarch combination mid-8.04.1-menlow uses and randomly trying them out is not optimal [20:14] Oh I thought you didn't find the wiki; nm [20:14] zackr: You can get the config file from the lpia kernel or the git repo [20:15] We use the standard hardy kernel [20:15] But for the lpia arch [20:18] hey all [20:18] lool: yea, the config isn't the problem, i copied it over. it's the make-kpkg that just refuses to run with the defaults. i could compile it all by hand and then change the grub also by hand, but obviously one of the reason for running a distro on those things is not have to do that =) [20:19] zackr: TBH I found make-kpkg a horrible tool and regret having looked at it in the past [20:20] It's hard to debug, complex and error prone :-/ [20:20] zackr: You could take the kernel source package and build it like a regular debian package though [20:21] i need 2.6.28. i need gem and pat patches in [20:21] i'll probably just compile it all by hand [20:23] We have 2.6.28 in jaunty [20:23] But not for lpia [20:30] ogra: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.moblin.devel/1012 [20:31] 10 MB tarball [20:31] The fact that there are separate tarballs for various distros kind of worries me === asac_ is now known as asac [20:37] ogra: Ok, same binary only crap :-(