[00:00] great ;) [00:00] in case there is a jar! dir, it will produce a jar file, zip it in xpi, and then remove jar file :) [00:08] Jazzva: bugabundo is really crazy [00:08] he uses identi.ca for chatting [00:08] i think i have to remove him from my subscriptions ;) [00:08] phone [01:04] asac, yeah... people tend to do that. [01:05] it's ok while it's not too frequent... otherwise, I consider it spamming my timeline [01:09] funny... identi.ca doesn't have the option to ignore @replies (messages that start with "@nickname")... it should implement it... [01:29] Jazzva: i lost your branch during reboot but looked good ... remember me to upload tomorrow [01:30] now going to bed [01:30] night [01:30] sure... me too [01:30] good night [02:40] asac: yeah that guy is nuts [09:43] bug 309202 [09:43] Launchpad bug 309202 in soyuz "uid for signing key is misleading" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/309202 [10:36] fta: flashplugin needs an update =) [10:41] already? [10:43] gnomefreak: new upstream release because of grave security hole. http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-24.html [10:44] ah well thats easy enough just change the mdsums and respin ;) [10:44] gnomefreak: sure but nevertheless fta has to update the package for the archive ;) [10:46] i can do it but iirc, asac wanted something else too [10:47] fta: partner repo? It has the fixed version already btw [10:47] did adobe agree to make a free version? i remember it was something we asked them [10:50] * gnomefreak be back need to restart [13:19] asac, whenever you get here... just a reminder requested yesterday: push bugmail :) [13:22] fta2: if you have time, please make the package in jaunty pull down the orig.tar.gz from partner repo ;) [13:22] fta2: otherwise just update it everywhere [13:22] we will do the partner repo for jaunty afterwards then [13:26] armin76: sparc build of tuxguitar failed (in jaunty) [13:26] armin76: also sparc build of helix-player failed (in jaunty) [13:48] Jazzva: strange ... i added default.conf to that branch ... pushed it to ~ubuntu-dev [13:48] now it doesnt export upstream automatically [13:48] for whatever not-understood reason [13:48] hmm... [13:49] Jazzva: can you look ... maybe i am just blind :) [13:49] looking already [13:50] checking if it's revid [13:52] i even tried "1" instead of revid:... [13:52] didnt work [13:52] hmm [13:53] i am sure all other extensions we tried worked ;) [13:54] works when I call it like this [13:54] bzr bd --export-upstream=. --export-upstream-revision=revid:jazzva@gmail.com-20081210110900-3ia3rnb68n44qrsr [13:54] but that's the same parameters as in default.conf [13:54] yeah [13:54] too bad that james_w isnt here [13:54] we probably should file a bug against bzr-builddeb [13:55] it's weird... checked again default.conf, and both parameters match [13:56] let me file [13:56] ok [14:02] bug 309335 [14:02] Launchpad bug 309335 in bzr-builddeb ".bzr-builddeb/default.conf doesnt export-upstream in some cases" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/309335 [14:03] thanks for the report :) [14:48] fta2: (?:.{0,108}) ... what does that mean? [14:52] 0 or 108 times anything, not memorized [14:53] so basically, (?:.{0,108}) is equiv to .{0,108} [14:53] asac, ^^ [14:56] mozilla bug 469760 [14:56] Mozilla bug 469760 in Add-ons Manager "blocklist url %LOCALE% replaced with general.useragent.locale value, but without resolving complex value on ubuntu" [Major,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469760 [14:56] fta2: thanks [16:31] asac: and whats that stuff? never heard of it [16:35] armin76: i received mail about that build failure ;) [16:37] i wonder why that even is available on sparc [19:34] ok unsubscribed from bugabundo identi.ca ... he just chatts === asac_ is now known as asac [20:52] fta: did we inteentionally opt-out of pyxpcom in our xul package? [20:52] it was in 1.9 but isnt in 1.9.1 [20:56] y'all seen http://secunia.com/Advisories/33221/ yet? [21:06] tonyyarusso: yes i think fta was on it [21:10] 'k