[01:37] <bryce> ok, fleshed out more of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/OptionsEditor
[01:37] <bryce> (that one is getting rather long.....)
[06:39] <jcristau> bryce: yeah, if it's filed upstream it's fine
[07:24] <tjaalton> hmm, turns out that nouveau upstream does accept bugs, but not about 3D support just yet
[07:39] <bryce> tjaalton: we're under 2000 bugs today
[07:44] <tjaalton> bryce: rejoice!
[07:46] <bryce> we're also about 2-3 bugs from getting -nv off https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+upstreamreport
[07:47] <tjaalton> I still don't know how to read that page
[07:48] <tjaalton> ah, wikipage
[07:48] <tjaalton> xorg shouldn't be on that list
[07:49] <tjaalton> since the bugs are either just accumulated there because people are lazy or uneducated, or packaging bugs
[07:52] <bryce> pretty much the three columns worth looking at are the ones under %
[07:54] <bryce> the first one is % marked triaged, second is % with an upstream link, and third is % that have been reported upstream
[07:55] <bryce> so the idea is you want to get all three to high values
[07:55] <tjaalton> the second column counts every 3rd party project
[07:55] <tjaalton> not just upstream
[07:55] <bryce> yeah I know :-(
[07:55] <bryce> I tried bringing that up in Jorge's talk at UDS but guess I didn't get my point across
[07:56] <tjaalton> if packages had a single "real" upstream project linked to them, it would be easier to count I guess
[07:57] <bryce> I'd like to make an Xorg-specific version of that page some day.  Some day...
[07:58] <tjaalton> that would be nice
[08:06] <wgrant> Packages can have upstreams linked, but it's so rarely done that it's probably not useful for that page.
[13:54] <lool> tjaalton: Could you wait a little longer before mass rebuilding Xorg modules next time?  armel server wasn't built so I'll repush them again
[13:58] <tjaalton> lool: I haven't pushed anything since Monday
[13:58] <tjaalton> probably auto-rebuilds then
[13:59] <lool> tjaalton: It's probably there since monday
[14:00] <lool> It's just that we're noticing now :)
[14:02] <tjaalton> there are a bunch of input-drivers which fail to build, but no-one uses them and they are in universe, so I'll get to them later
[15:13] <jcristau> heh, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxi/+bug/304275
[15:14] <jcristau> sometimes automated mails are not so helpful :)
[15:15] <jcristau> also i'm guessing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxi/+bug/304313 should be closed if the Replaces are in place
[15:17] <jcristau> and, it looks like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxi/+bug/289762 should go back to gimp or gtk, which should detect when the device goes away
[15:18] <lool> tjaalton: I'm preparing a pile of rebuilds for armel; perhaps they are also rebuilds for other arches; I'll send you a list of .changes I'll push just after alpha 2 so that we don't dup work
[15:19] <lool> -tga ftbfses on all arches
[15:19] <jcristau> unless you're planning on an alpha port, -tga should be removed
[15:20] <lool> (I'll let this decision to bryce and tjaalton; I'm happy to do the actual changes to drop it)
[15:30] <lool> xserver-xorg-video-vga also failed to build
[15:31] <jcristau> it'd fail to work even if it built, so you can remove it...
[15:31] <lool> jcristau: Is it being dropped upstream?
[15:32] <jcristau> pretty much.
[15:33] <lool> tjaalton: This is what I'll be pushing after alpha 2:
[15:33] <lool> wacom-tools xserver-xorg-input-evdev xserver-xorg-video-ati xserver-xorg-video-cirrus xserver-xorg-video-fbdev xserver-xorg-video-i128 xserver-xorg-video-i740 xserver-xorg-video-mach64 xserver-xorg-video-mga xserver-xorg-video-nv xserver-xorg-video-r128 xserver-xorg-video-s3virge xserver-xorg-video-tdfx xserver-xorg-video-v4l xserver-xorg-video-vmware
[15:39] <lool> evtouch also failed to build
[15:40] <lool> With the above, we should have input-all installable on armel
[15:42] <lool> Ah I see evdev has a git branch
[15:44] <lool> tjaalton: (I guess you don't commit simple rebuilds to the git tree since I don't see xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.1.0-0ubuntu2 in git, so I wont add the 1:2.1.0-0ubuntu3 rebuild either)
[20:12] <pwnguin> sigh
[20:12] <pwnguin> "I have updated the driver to support both Xorg 1.6 later and earlier.  Does anyone have time to test it on your system?  You'll need to build and install wacom_drv.so from the new linuxwacom package on your system. I prefer you have an Xorg 1.6 running.  Please reply to me directly so I can email the package to you."
[20:13] <pwnguin> how does someone run an open source project for years without experimenting with branching?
[20:14] <pwnguin> (also is 1.6 even out? or just 1.5.99b3
[21:58] <bryce> pwnguin: he probably means 1.5.99b3
[22:01] <pwnguin> (is that in the jaunty repos?)
[22:01] <pwnguin> ive not been paying a lot of attention lately --  new job
[22:02] <bryce> ah congrats
[22:02] <bryce> yep, entered jaunty last week