[00:04]  * Ryan52 wonders if that should be low..
[00:06]  * duanedesign agrees
[00:07]  * Ryan52 sets it to wishlist
[00:07]  * duanedesign is appreciative 
[00:07] <Ryan52> :)
[04:05] <pckchem> Umm... What should I do about bug 310431 and his illegally downloaded movie that won't open?
[04:05] <pckchem> :(
[04:08] <pckchem> Heh, illegal subtitles? Whatever.
[04:10] <duanedesign> bug #310353 I think should be set to 'wishlist' however this problem goes back to the default dpi settings in Gnome. So this 'bug' is entirely dependant on whether or not Gnome is ever going to default to the actual dpi or the default 96dpi
[04:37] <duanedesign> PrivateVoid: hello
[04:38] <PrivateVoid> hey duanedesign
[04:41] <duanedesign> PrivateVoid: I wanted your permission to post your ufw how to on my blog
[04:41] <PrivateVoid> Fine by me...
[04:41] <PrivateVoid> just link to the original
[04:42] <duanedesign> definetly, it was the easiest to understand, in my opinion
[04:43] <PrivateVoid> k
[04:48] <crimsun> pckchem: i've asked for an additional test
[04:50] <pckchem> crimsun: ?
[04:51] <crimsun> pckchem: you referenced bug 310431 about 46 minutes ago
[04:53] <pckchem> crimsun: Thats fine. Although I'm curious why you would choose to have him test it in 9.04 when so far nobody on 8.10 is able to reproduce?
[05:03] <crimsun> pckchem: question of detail, really. the current task is for the development version, not 8.10.
[05:04] <crimsun> pckchem: to be %100 precise, i'd need to open an intrepid task, too.
[05:07] <Ryan52> duanedesign: err, sorry you didn't get a response yet, give me a minute...
[05:08] <Ryan52> duanedesign, it should probably be set to wont fix also, because the default dpi bug is marked as wont fix...fixing this bug would just "break" stuff unless the other one is also fixed, which it won't..
[05:09] <Ryan52> or did I not read that well enough?
[05:12] <Ryan52> also, since it's configurable it's not really a "bug", so I agree about the wishlist setting.
[05:19] <Ryan52> duanedesign, set to wishlist, it'd probably be nice if you explain (it's configurable, usually only affected if you change some other default setting, etc etc) why in a comment.
[05:20] <duanedesign> Ryan52: I noticed that. Since I am fairly new to triage I wamt to make sure on certain things. Thank You
[05:24] <duanedesign> Ryan52: I think you read it correctly. I agree with your take on it. I will comment on it. If you changed the font size then everyone who accepts the default would have a font size too small.
[05:25] <duanedesign> and as it stands there are no plans, according to the default dpi bug, to change the 96dpi setting in Gnome
[05:31] <Ryan52> yup
[06:42] <marmuta> hi, I've tracked bug #309785 down to a recent xorg patch by Peter Hutterer. I know the buggy line, how do I go from there?
[06:42] <marmuta> Is he reading launchpad bugs at all?
[06:44] <RAOF> marmuta: If he's an upstream developer, probably not.
[06:44] <RAOF> Urgh.  EPARSE
[06:46] <marmuta> ok, is there an irc channel where the ubuntu X devs hang out?
[06:48] <RAOF> #ubuntu-x
[06:50] <RAOF> But it looks like he isn't actually directly involved in Ubuntu development, so he probably doesn't read Launchpad.
[06:51] <marmuta> ok, thank you, I guess I have to figure out how to get the bug upstream then
[06:51] <RAOF> marmuta: Which means the bug should probably go upstream to X's bugzilla.
[06:53] <marmuta> yep, I think I've found it: bugs.freedesktop.org
[07:09] <dholbach> good morning
[11:37] <Hew> We're about to hit 50,000 open Ubuntu bugs.. :-(
[11:39]  * Hew triages against the tide
[12:07] <Valsum> Hello, I have a question. Does one have to know how to program to help the Bug Squad?
[12:09] <MrKanister> Valsum: No, there are a lot of other things you can do. Have a lock at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/GettingInvolved for information about what you can do to help out with bugs
[12:09] <Valsum> yeah, I have already read that. So no programming skills needed for assigning packages and triaging bugs, right?
[12:12] <Hew> Valsum: That's right :-). Feel free to join the Launchpad team if you haven't already, and just start triaging!
[12:13] <MrKanister> Valsum: Yes, that's right. I think a good idea to start is to have a look at the new filed bug. Join #ubuntu-bugs-announce and you get notified about new bugs. With the help of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage you can then make the bug report more informative until it is ready for being read by a developer
[12:13] <Hew> We're about to hit 50,000 open Ubuntu bugs, so the more help we get, the more bugs we can get to work on!
[12:15]  * Hobbsee randomly closes 10000 bugs
[12:15] <Hobbsee> that better?
[12:20] <Hobbsee> !ping
[12:20] <Hobbsee> hmmm
[12:20] <Valsum> MrKanister: Thanks.
[12:22] <MrKanister> Valsum: Thank you for helping us :)
[12:24] <Valsum> No prob. The more the merrier, hehe.
[12:25] <MrKanister> Valsum: That's right
[12:35] <Hew> Hobbsee: I wish it were that easy :P
[12:35] <Hobbsee> Hew: well, it can be.  you just have to get policy changed to say it's OK :P
[12:35] <Hew> hehe
[14:07] <bddebian> Boo
[14:10] <abraxxa> hello
[14:11] <abraxxa> the new libavahi packages from last week seem to break samba authentification, is this a known bug?
[14:21]  * BUGabundo_work opens 10001 to by pass Hobbsee doing!
[14:25]  * Hew has only closed about 10 :P
[15:28] <azimout> question: which tag should be applied to bug reports that need to be forwarded upstream?
[15:28] <azimout> according to this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags, 'needs-upstream-report' is kubuntu-specific
[15:32] <Hew> azimout: Ideally you can forward it yourself and link the upstream bug, but if you are unable to do that, you can just open an upstream task with New status.
[15:36] <azimout> i know about upstream reporting, i want to choose a tag, for bugadays or the global bug jam in february
[15:37] <azimout> anyways, is there some reason why 'needs-upstream-report' should be kde-only?
[20:01] <ryanakca> What package does bug 309591 belong to?
[20:01] <Pici> Definitely not kubuntu-website
[20:01] <Pici> :)
[20:02] <ryanakca> Pici: *nod*, I'm trying to clear out the bugs filed against it...
[20:06] <ryanakca> Pici: should I just set it to Ubuntu?
[20:07] <Pici> ryanakca: I think its 'debian-installer' for the alternate CD.
[20:07] <ryanakca> Thanks
[20:15] <Ryan52> that's not even a bug. grub (legacy) doesn't work with raid 0.
[21:32] <kenkku> hi everyone, regarding bug 310723, the drivers don't support 16 bit (http://ati.amd.com/products/catalyst/linux.html#9), which naturally can't be fixed by ubuntu and is aknowledged by the AMD developers, what state should the bug be set to?
[21:32] <kenkku> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/310723
[21:33] <kenkku> ah, hehe, ubottu was just a bit slow
[21:37] <charlie-tca> Will the ubuntu ati drivers ever have fglrx?
[21:38] <charlie-tca> We do have our own now, even though they don´t support it at the moment
[21:39] <charlie-tca> OTH, it is a question he asked! ... is this possible? a simple answer is ¨not at this time¨