[09:07] <gnomefreak> this might sound stupid, but is there a command to show what DE you are in?
[09:12]  * gnomefreak is confused :(
[09:39] <directhex> gnomefreak, "ps -ef" :p
[09:39] <gnomefreak> bug 120848
[09:39] <gnomefreak> morning directhex
[09:39] <directhex> hello
[09:49] <gnomefreak> WTF is it with people filing Windows bugs in Launchpad :(
[10:03] <directhex> gnomefreak, really?
[10:03] <gnomefreak> yeah it was on a LInux bug that he complained abou it on windows
[10:03] <directhex> because LP is nicer than bugzilla, and it's a packager's job to pass bugs upstream!
[10:03] <gnomefreak> he doesnt run Linux AFAICT
[10:15] <gnomefreak> what kernel is in Intrepid?
[10:17] <gnomefreak> i have a feeling its 2.6.25 but i need someone to confirm this for me
[10:26] <directhex> Linux osc-franzibald 2.6.27-9-generic #1 SMP Thu Nov 20 22:15:32 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[10:26] <gnomefreak> thanks that is what i thought :)
[10:30] <gnomefreak> bug 310145
[10:42] <gnomefreak> ubufox needs to be updated for 3.1
[10:42] <gnomefreak> xulrunner as well it seems
[11:20]  * gnomefreak cant remember the damn bug :(
[11:37] <asac> gnomefreak: hola
[11:37] <gnomefreak> asac: for bug 305738 i can remove FlashGot.cpp if needed, I dont see any reason why we need to remove it but its simple enough to remove, doesnt make a difference to me, but i will remove DAP.cpp sometime today
[11:37] <gnomefreak> asac: hello
[11:37] <asac> gnomefreak: i think i sponsored a bunch of things
[11:37] <asac> oh right
[11:38] <asac> yeah ... at least remove DAP.cpp
[11:38] <gnomefreak> yep you did
[11:38] <gnomefreak> ok
[11:38] <asac> FlashGot.cpp has a license in it right?
[11:38] <asac> what is it there for?
[11:38] <asac> dont we need to build it?
[11:39] <asac> gnomefreak: what extensions are left ... vimperator? anything else?
[11:40] <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20627354/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.lightning-sunbird_0.8%2Bnobinon
[11:40] <asac> +ly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[11:41] <Nafallo> asac: let me guess. kahikatea?
[11:41] <Nafallo> also, breaking urls == evil
[11:41] <Nafallo> :-P
[11:42] <asac> Nafallo: yes ... i wonder when my mutt changed his pref back to this ;)
[11:42] <Nafallo> ah. podocarpus :-)
[11:43] <Nafallo> so actual build failure ;-)
[11:43] <asac> yep
[11:43] <asac> usually its CHROOT-FULLY-EXPLODED
[11:43] <asac> but this is really FAILEDTOBUILD
[11:43] <Nafallo> hehe
[11:43] <gnomefreak> asac: ill look as soon as i finish flashgot. there is a problem with vimperator sort of, I guess either we drop iceweasel-vimperator or make it transitional since it is in archive due to autosync (still dont like that idea)
[11:44] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. please figure out what those .cpp files are for at all
[11:44] <asac> gnomefreak: does flashgot work at all?
[11:44] <gnomefreak> asac: yes so far i havent had issues
[11:44] <asac> gnomefreak: can you try to add the .bzr-builddeb/default.conf file to flashgot (and the other outstanding extensions)?
[11:45] <asac> i added that for you for all i uploaded ... in case you want to take a look
[11:45] <gnomefreak> asac: ok will do
[11:47] <asac> fta: +  * Temporarily disable ubuntu bookmarks patch, it needs some work
[11:47] <asac> +    - update debian/patches/series
[11:47] <asac> ?
[11:49] <asac> fta: ah thats the additional ubuntu bookmarks and not the amazon code
[11:49] <asac> right
[11:57] <asac> gnomefreak: can you prepare a list of iceweasel syncs that need to be fixed for us?
[11:58] <asac> (just reading one mail where you refer to them)
[11:58] <gnomefreak> yep
[12:00] <asac> gnomefreak: mozvoikko ... you have time to review that?
[12:01] <gnomefreak> yes is there a bug on it?
[12:03] <gnomefreak> asac: how did you make the */default.conf? Im assuming you didnt make it by hand. brb smoke and make coffee
[12:04] <asac> gnomefreak: yes by hand ... wait a second ;)
[12:04] <asac> gnomefreak: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Bzr
[12:04] <asac> search for bzr-builddeb
[12:04] <asac> there
[12:04] <asac> there are some hints
[12:04] <asac> let me know if something isnt clear
[12:05] <asac> gnomefreak: you can test that it works by removeing the tarball from tarballs/ and then just running bzr bd
[12:06] <asac> usually you fix the export-upstream-revision in the bzr merge commit ... but its ok t oadd them just on top if they dont exist yet
[12:12] <asac> http://identi.ca/notice/1557884
[12:14] <gnomefreak> ok ill look at it when im done. g/f needs help with something
[13:30] <gnomefreak> i have officially forgot what i was doing :(
[13:34] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 306229 for iceweasel packages that im aware of so far
[13:44] <gnomefreak> asac: once i make the .bzr-builddeb/default.conf do i push that change to .ubuntu or to .upstream branch?
[13:45] <Jazzva> gnomefreak, .ubuntu branch...
[13:45] <gnomefreak> Jazzva: thanks
[13:45] <Jazzva> but it could be all in one branch, ie. you can extract .upstream branch from .ubuntu branch...
[13:45] <Jazzva> gnomefreak, np
[13:52] <fta> asac, yep, the bookmarks file is now a .in. it was too late yesterday and as xul was already in, i didn't want to let users with an unusable ff (gre mismatch)
[13:52] <fta> asac, http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/locales/generic/profile/bookmarks.html.in
[13:52] <fta> i'll fix that today
[13:52] <fta> btw, firefox-3.2 is now in my ppa
[14:22] <gnomefreak> ok flashgot is done finally
[14:36] <gnomefreak> asac: do you knwo what extensions you sponsored? this way i know what ones need .bzr-buildeb/*
[14:37] <gnomefreak> ok someth9ing i was supposed to review
[14:38] <fta> asac, mozilla bug 461979
[14:48] <gnomefreak> asac: i commented on bug 297169
[14:49]  * gnomefreak caught up for today i think :)
[15:13] <gnomefreak> ok caught up and gone for a while. things need to get done so i can go away for holidays
[15:25] <asac> fta: -central is 3.1b3 for me ;)
[15:26] <asac> where do you get 3.2 from?
[15:26] <fta> i moved the mozclient file to the branches
[15:26] <fta> mozcentral is 3.2a1pre
[15:27] <fta> http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1 is 3.1b3pre
[15:27] <asac> fta: strange for me its 3.1b3pre
[15:27] <asac> changeset:   22982:8638a9d70d4e
[15:27] <asac> tag:         qtip
[15:27] <asac> tag:         tip
[15:27] <asac> tag:         404314.attempt.lazy.menugenerated
[15:27] <asac> user:        asac@tinya.personalfree.com
[15:27] <asac> date:        Sat Dec 20 18:07:20 2008 +0100
[15:27] <asac> summary:     [mq]: 404314.attempt.lazy.menugenerated
[15:27] <asac> changeset:   22978:050ae62b7d9d
[15:27] <asac> parent:      22977:0ee09d199a86
[15:27] <asac> parent:      22976:8a97d8909df3
[15:27] <asac> user:        Serge Gautherie <sgautherie.bz@free.fr>
[15:27] <asac> date:        Sat Dec 20 05:12:18 2008 +0100
[15:27] <asac> summary:     Merge for "Backed out changeset: 9990da98d7b7" of
[15:27] <asac> let me check if i just missed a full rebiuld
[15:28] <fta> well, compare http://hg.mozilla.org/index.cgi/mozilla-central and http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1
[15:28] <asac> fta: ok you are right ... i didnt rebuild browser/ for some time as it seems
[15:28] <fta> i mean http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central and http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1
[15:28] <asac> fta: thanks for moving  branch logic to the branches
[15:29] <asac> fta: so we probably need to SRU mozilla-devscripts in intrepid
[15:29] <fta> you need m-d from my ppa, otherwise the no-bin will be broken
[15:29] <asac> because 1.9.1 points to central
[15:29] <fta> yep
[15:29] <asac> did you look into flash?
[15:30] <asac> (yet)
[15:31] <fta> nope, not yet, i'm buried in my {X,nvidia,evo,rhythmbox,....} crashes, ff regressions, ...
[15:31] <fta> .. p-a asserts
[15:32] <fta> worse desktop experience in years
[15:32]  * asac suffers for fta
[15:43] <fta> bug 310611
[16:10] <asac_the_bumber> bumb!
[16:32] <asac> asac: nothing to bumb imo
[16:32] <asac> except nss of course
[16:41] <asac> @time berlin
[17:28] <asac_the_bumber> bumb
[17:29] <asac> be more specific ;)
[18:31] <BUGabundo1> asac: fta: any reason why jaunty lost the rebranding of FF3.1?
[18:31] <BUGabundo1> its now called (again) minefield and not shiretoko
[19:53] <fta> BUGabundo1, because it's a snapshot (b3pre), not a milestone (b2, b3, ..). it's an upstream requirement. if you prefer shiretoko, you can stick to the version in universe (b2).
[19:54] <BUGabundo1> naaa
[19:54] <BUGabundo1> I'm fine with it
[19:54] <BUGabundo1> thought it was a bug fta
[19:56] <fta> i preferred shiretoko but upstream complained, that's why.
[19:57] <BUGabundo1> ok ok
[19:57] <BUGabundo1> np fta
[19:57] <armin76> lol
[19:58] <fta> the side effect is that my ppa now has two minefields, 3.1 and 3.2
[20:00] <BUGabundo1> 3.2 already? damn
[20:00] <fta> a1pre
[20:19] <BUGabundo1> fta: why does upstream requires the name? and why did we use shiretoko?
[20:24] <[reed]> fta: that doesn't sound right
[20:24] <[reed]> you should be able to use Shiretoko for 3.1
[20:24] <[reed]> now that we've branched
[20:24] <[reed]> who said otherwise?
[20:24] <[reed]> we're using Shiretoko for pre builds
[20:24] <[reed]> dunno why you can't!
[20:25] <fta> [reed], lol, *you* complained several times
[20:26] <[reed]> yeah, well
[20:26] <[reed]> that's before we renamed stuff ourselves
[20:26] <[reed]> :)
[20:26] <[reed]> unless you've heard differently from somebody else, feel free to use Shiretoko on 3.1
[20:45] <Lns> asac: hey man, is there any way you can give me an update on where the /dev/random vs. urandom fix is in Ubuntu 8.04.1 yet? I sort of dropped the ball and am not sure where we left off.
[21:07] <Lns> Also, can anyone comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/19033 ?
[21:21] <cwillu> '''terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
[21:21] <cwillu>   what():  std::bad_alloc'''
[21:21] <cwillu> this is on ff-3.1b2 out of what's-his-name's ppa
[21:21] <cwillu> fta
[21:22] <cwillu> consistently happens every day or so
[21:22] <cwillu> while ff is idle
[21:24]  * cwillu installs some updates, and promises to come back again :p
[21:25] <fta> [reed], ^^
[21:26] <fta> cwillu, never heard of that bug
[21:27] <cwillu> fta, I use firefox in a very stress-testy way :p
[21:27] <fta> mozilla bug 413405
[21:27] <fta> cwillu, are you running out of memory?
[21:28] <cwillu> unlikely
[21:28] <cwillu> well, I guess it could be leaking, I've got 2.5 gigs though, and loads of swap
[21:29] <cwillu> granted that my firefox processes usually sit at around 800mb, and judging from my currently free memory, it was at ~1.3gb when it died, which is definately larger than it should be
[21:29] <cwillu> flash + flashblock are the only plugins I have active right now
[21:29]  * cwillu misses firebug already :(
[21:30] <fta> i usually have >150 tabs, no problem here
[21:30] <cwillu> okay, I historically have gotten no sympathy out of #firefox, so I figured I'd mention it up front :)
[21:31] <cwillu> any useful parms to pass in for debugging?
[21:31] <cwillu> I'll just pipe to a file, and link it the next time I have a crash (if I have another crash)
[21:32] <fta> firefox-3.x -g
[21:32] <fta> let it die and try to obtain a trace
[21:32] <fta> install firefox-3.x-dbg firsy
[21:32] <fta> t
[21:35] <cwillu> I usually run as -P -no-remote (I have an addiction to a really badly designed flash game that really needs to be in a seperate firefox if I want to be able to multitask at all)
[21:35] <cwillu> (mentioned for completeness, just taking on -g to that)
[21:36] <fta> -g must be 1st
[21:37] <cwillu> bah
[21:37] <cwillu> k
[21:37] <cwillu> see, this is why I ask :p
[21:37]  * cwillu waits for ff to finish loading tabs, lest his session include 60 about:blanks the next time he reloads
[21:38] <cwillu> ...on the off chance that bug hasn't been fixed yet
[21:39] <fta> that's because i intercept -g in the launcher script
[21:39] <fta> but only if it's in the 1st place
[21:40] <cwillu> okay
[21:42] <fta> * cwillu misses firebug already :( <= why ?
[21:42] <fta> tried 1.4a ?
[21:42] <cwillu> disabled it a little while back in case it was to blame
[21:43] <cwillu> I'll give it a shot next week
[21:45] <fta> 1.4.0a10 seems to be the last one
[21:45] <fta> http://antennasoft.net/robcee/2008/12/17/firebug-in-firefox-31b2-and-beyond/
[21:46] <cwillu> thanks
[21:51] <cwillu> bah
[21:51] <cwillu> how do I work gdb again?
[21:54] <cwillu> how do I work gdb again?
[21:54] <fta_> r (run)
[21:55] <cwillu> thanks
[21:55] <cwillu> just figured it out too :p
[21:55] <fta_> when it crashes, bt and bt f
[21:55] <cwillu> k
[22:00] <cwillu> segfault really early on
[22:00] <cwillu> (fta ^^)
[22:01]  * Lns bangs his head against the wall because he can't set a lockedPref for a homepage
[22:01] <fta_> cwillu, got a backtrace ?
[22:02] <cwillu> Cannot access memory at address 0xfe8c838f
[22:02] <fta_> where?
[22:03] <cwillu> right when I type bt
[22:03] <cwillu> oh, nvm :p
[22:03] <cwillu> #0  0xb7f92ba8 in ?? ()
[22:03] <cwillu> #1  0xc085ffff in ?? ()
[22:03] <fta_> hm, not very helpful
[22:03] <fta_> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind
[22:04] <cwillu> silly question, but I didn't need to sudo anything here did I?
[22:04] <fta_> nope
[22:04] <fta_> never sudo firefox, it will f*k up your profile
[22:05] <cwillu> was just wondering
[22:08] <cwillu> I'm not running valgrind under gdb right?
[22:13] <cwillu> well, tried with -g,
[22:13] <cwillu> segfault again, very little in the valgrind output
[22:18] <cwillu> well, tried with -g,
[22:18] <cwillu> segfault again, very little in the valgrind output
[22:18] <cwillu> running it again right now without the -g
[22:19] <cwillu> G_SLICE=always-malloc G_DEBUG=gc-friendly  valgrind -v --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --num-callers=40 --log-file=valgrind.log firefox-3.1 -P -no-remote
[22:19] <fta> don't use -g and valgrind at the same time
[22:19] <fta> yep
[22:20] <cwillu> shouldn't the log file be growing at some quick pace?
[22:20] <cwillu> 3.8k, not growing at all
[22:20] <cwillu> oops, nvm, bad a bad assumption
[22:21] <cwillu> by the way, I didn't think anything of it at the time, but when I ran with -g, it seemed to hit 3 breakpoints before firefox actually fired up (hit enter to continue or q to quit)
[23:02] <fta> another X crash. grrrr
[23:02] <fta> reverting to nvidia-177..
[23:24] <asac> kl
[23:24] <asac> Lns: letes talk about that tomorrw
[23:24] <Lns> asac: not sure if i'll be around tomorrow - did you see my latest comments in LP?
[23:24] <asac> Lns: please, lets talk about that later this weeek ;)
[23:25] <Lns> asac: I'm going to be on vacation for the rest of the week.. :(
[23:26] <asac> Lns: hmm ... is it the homepage thing=
[23:26] <asac> ?
[23:26] <asac> Lns: look at ubufox package ... it has an example
[23:26] <Lns> asac: no, sorry actually, this was the /dev/random issue
[23:26] <asac> Lns: ah
[23:26]  * Lns is dealing with multiple bugs  right now :)
[23:26] <asac> well ... then lets talk next year ... currently i am not doing much good (too much beer ;))
[23:26] <Lns> asac: lol!!! ok =) have good beer!
[23:27] <asac> eh ... well, beer is over, but i am still drunk until i sleep i guess
[23:27] <asac> cu later
[23:27] <Lns> lol...ok. dont' do any coding until tomorrow! =p