| crimsun | one sound bug down, five million remaining | 00:44 |
|---|---|---|
| fta | :) | 00:44 |
| crimsun | should fix your recording with external mic, too, fta | 00:45 |
| fta | i'd prefer the asserts and choppy sound bugs fixed 1st :P | 00:47 |
| fta | asac, i have a problem with the branding.. the desktop icon is the abrowser icon unconditionally | 00:49 |
| fta | asac, nm | 00:52 |
| fta | crimsun, E: alsa-util.c: Error opening PCM device hw:0: Device or resource busy | 01:56 |
| fta | E: module.c: Failed to load module "module-alsa-sink" (argument: "device_id=0 sink_name=alsa_output.pci_8086_27d8_sound_card_0_alsa_playback_0 tsched=1"): initialization failed. | 01:56 |
| fta | but: | 01:56 |
| crimsun | hrm | 01:56 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ sudo lsof -n | grep snd | 01:56 |
| fta | mixer_app 9089 fta 26u CHR 116,9 13165 /dev/snd/controlC0 | 01:56 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/94006/ | 01:57 |
| fta | crimsun, it crashed while playing o-a | 01:58 |
| fta | Dec 28 02:26:54 ix last message repeated 101 times | 01:58 |
| fta | Dec 28 02:26:54 ix pulseaudio[9029]: asyncmsgq.c: Assertion 'pa_asyncq_push(a->asyncq, &i, TRUE) == 0' failed at pulsecore/asyncmsgq.c:164, function pa_asyncmsgq_send(). Aborting. | 01:58 |
| fta | i was packing a big tarball so it was with a lot of I/O | 01:59 |
| crimsun | fta: thanks | 01:59 |
| fta | but it's a dual core, it should not impact the sound | 01:59 |
| === Jazzva_ is now known as Jazzva | ||
| asac | fta: mozilla bug 421611 | 03:23 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 421611 in Build Config "Need to be able to run tests on arbitrary build" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421611 | 03:23 |
| fta | asac, i'll read that tomorrow, too long :P | 03:32 |
| fta | asac, btw, i no longer tweak APPNAME, the profile patch is now as simple as http://paste.ubuntu.com/94045/ | 03:34 |
| asac | good | 03:35 |
| asac | if that gives what we want ;) | 03:35 |
| asac | did they eliminate the "org/product" two-name constrainted finally? | 03:35 |
| asac | s/org/vendor/ | 03:35 |
| fta | seems like it | 03:36 |
| asac | damn so i managed to not trigger click event when this auto activation menu thing happens ... and then its not the cause :/ | 03:39 |
| asac | hell whats the reason ;) | 03:40 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: noticed that you uploaded a new patch. I think I tried that now (started with trial & error method, removing stac92xx_set_config_reg(...) one by one), but now I'm compiling again. | 03:53 |
| fta | -4°C here, brrrr | 03:54 |
| Jazzva | fta: same here... was -6 few hours ago. | 03:54 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: I tried to copy over all stac92xx_set_config_reg(...) calls from DELL_STAC_BIOS case to DELL_STAC_3ST, and it didn't change anything. the sound was there, but external mic didn't work | 03:58 |
| Jazzva | of course, I didn't change that SND_PCI_QUIRK from _3ST to _BIOS | 03:59 |
| Jazzva | another reboot... | 03:59 |
| fta | damn, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20771571/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20081228r23135%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 03:59 |
| fta | /usr/bin/ld: libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined | 04:00 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: i'm fairly certain your issue with the original patch is caused by spdif collision | 04:11 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: your codec's init setup is completely different, so you can't use the wholesale copying | 04:11 |
| Jazzva | noticed that in the new patch, i have to reboot again to test _take3.diff | 04:11 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: this is what i meant by serious regressions =) | 04:11 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: heh :). brb | 04:12 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: still fading out... | 04:17 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: with take3? | 04:18 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: is it possible that it is at some other place in the code, since I tried moving calls of stac92xx_set_... from DELL_STAC_BIOS to DELL_STAC_3ST, and it did nothing (as in the sound was there, no fading out, ext mic not working) | 04:19 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: yes, take3 | 04:19 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: well, the problem is in the actual initialisation | 04:19 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: all those were attempts to avoid having to rewrite an init verb table | 04:20 |
| crimsun | looks like i'll have to look into that, though | 04:20 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: per chance do you have a windows INF for that laptop? | 04:20 |
| Jazzva | no, I don't think so. I can try to find it... | 04:21 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: found two inf files on Dell's download site. I'll upload them and give you the links | 04:27 |
| crimsun | great, thanks | 04:28 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: thank you :) | 04:28 |
| crimsun | this is going to suck | 04:28 |
| crimsun | thanks to the reworking of the entire jack infrastructure, any work i do on this for jaunty is thrown away and already obsolete | 04:29 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: this is gonna be changed soon? | 04:30 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: it's already obsolete upstream | 04:30 |
| crimsun | current git head has a _completely_ different jack infrastructure | 04:30 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: ah... well, if you have to rewrite it later, maybe you don't need to work on it right now... | 04:30 |
| crimsun | i mean, it's a good thing, because the whole jack thing was horrible (and you can see) | 04:30 |
| crimsun | nah, i can rewrite it fairly easily against the new semantics | 04:31 |
| crimsun | it's just fixing it against the old one that's going to hurt =) | 04:31 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: www.jazzva.com/ubuntu/stwrt.inf and www.jazzva.com/ubuntu/stwrt64.inf | 04:33 |
| crimsun | thanks | 04:33 |
| Jazzva | np | 04:34 |
| Jazzva | ok, off for another reboot, to return sound at least. and then off to sleep :). good night | 04:35 |
| crimsun | oh man, i'm an idiot | 06:22 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: ok, so forget the patches; i went back and read the data sheets | 06:23 |
| crimsun | Jazzva: so 'Mic' is your built-in array (digital); 'Front Mic' is actually your _external mic_ | 06:23 |
| crimsun | completely different from the realtek semantics :/ | 06:24 |
| * gnomefreak realy hates stupid warning that cant be fixed localely | 09:23 | |
| gnomefreak | j evelution | 09:25 |
| gnomefreak | camn | 09:26 |
| gnomefreak | why are people closing our tasks because it was fixed upstream? that should not happen unless it hit our archives | 11:10 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | gnomefreak: ++ | 13:02 |
| asac | saw that too | 13:02 |
| asac | what was his name? | 13:02 |
| gnomefreak | i commented on them | 13:02 |
| asac | (i cant remember) | 13:02 |
| gnomefreak | not sure off hand give me a minute | 13:02 |
| asac | Martin Mai i think | 13:03 |
| asac | seems not | 13:03 |
| asac | is tbird 3.0 gnome-support integration fixed? | 13:04 |
| asac | fta_: ? | 13:04 |
| gnomefreak | asac: Martin Mai | 13:04 |
| asac | i am still on 2.0 | 13:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: oh ... then i was really right ;) | 13:04 |
| gnomefreak | im on 3.0 and havent seen -gnome-support problems | 13:04 |
| gnomefreak | asac: yep i was just slow :) | 13:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: just tell him that thats wrong and he has to look at the "fixedx.x.x" tag to check whether it was rolled out to a versoin we ship | 13:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: a week or so ago gnome-support didnt work for http:// proto handler | 13:05 |
| asac | e.g. firefox wouldnt open | 13:05 |
| gnomefreak | i asked him if it was fixed in Ubuntu version and if i get answers i will open them as confirmed | 13:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: did you ask all extension authors for a license file? | 13:05 |
| gnomefreak | brings me to google search page | 13:05 |
| asac | seems like we will not be able to release things without that anymore | 13:06 |
| asac | gnomefreak: you can check by looking in upstream task | 13:06 |
| gnomefreak | asac: yes i have some that either refuse to answer or just havent yet its been over a month or 2 | 13:06 |
| asac | mozilla was "fixed3.0.5, verified 3.0.5" in whiteboard | 13:06 |
| asac | if it was committed to that tversion | 13:06 |
| asac | you can easily check that | 13:06 |
| gnomefreak | all that i poushed to PPA are done and ready | 13:06 |
| asac | by looking in bugzilla bug | 13:07 |
| asac | gnomefreak: from the last batch there were a few rejections by archive admins | 13:07 |
| asac | did you contact those? e.g. chatzillla | 13:07 |
| gnomefreak | this is what i get from above link http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=http%3A%2F%2F+proto+handler | 13:07 |
| gnomefreak | asac: i havent seen emails for them | 13:07 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i think everything was rejected | 13:08 |
| gnomefreak | shouldnt have been | 13:08 |
| asac | gnomefreak: so we should go through all branches and see what hasnt a license file ... and ping | 13:08 |
| asac | upstream | 13:08 |
| gnomefreak | define upstream | 13:08 |
| asac | author | 13:08 |
| asac | extension author | 13:08 |
| gnomefreak | auther rejected the packages? | 13:08 |
| asac | gnomefreak: no ... archive admins | 13:08 |
| asac | because of missing license in orig | 13:09 |
| gnomefreak | none are missing if i put them on PPA | 13:09 |
| asac | gnomefreak: dont understand what you mean | 13:09 |
| gnomefreak | License.txt is there | 13:09 |
| gnomefreak | in source | 13:09 |
| asac | gnomefreak: probably not in .upstream | 13:09 |
| asac | tree | 13:09 |
| asac | only in .ubuntu | 13:09 |
| gnomefreak | some are in dir. in source | 13:09 |
| gnomefreak | we have copyright in debian dir | 13:10 |
| asac | gnomefreak: yes thats not good enough ... "upstream" has to add license file to top level dir | 13:10 |
| asac | so it is in the orig.tar.gz we produce | 13:10 |
| gnomefreak | find me the ones that rejected and i will show you where it is | 13:10 |
| gnomefreak | yes | 13:10 |
| asac | gnomefreak: chatzilla | 13:10 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i think pretty much all that i uploaded from you | 13:10 |
| asac | were rejected because of upstrema doesnt have license file | 13:11 |
| asac | well ... i mean in the recent past | 13:11 |
| asac | flashgot too | 13:11 |
| asac | i think | 13:11 |
| asac | chatzilla nd flashgot | 13:11 |
| asac | for now | 13:11 |
| gnomefreak | gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/chatzilla/work/chatzilla.ubuntu/compon | 13:11 |
| gnomefreak | ents$ | 13:11 |
| gnomefreak | see that file for license | 13:11 |
| asac | gnomefreak: where? | 13:12 |
| gnomefreak | its a java file only one in there | 13:12 |
| gnomefreak | in componeents | 13:12 |
| asac | gnomefreak: doesnt really matter ... what we need is a upstream license in top level dir | 13:12 |
| gnomefreak | chatzilla-service.js | 13:12 |
| asac | and that needs to be in .upstream ... not just in ubuntu | 13:12 |
| asac | gnomefreak: thats not a license file | 13:12 |
| asac | gnomefreak: thats a file that has a license header ... but a license file needs to be named: "license.txt or COPYING or something" and requires the full license text | 13:13 |
| gnomefreak | it has it in there as for separate one we cant add it to source and sutors all said they are there | 13:13 |
| asac | gnomefreak: tell them that license headers in files are not explicit enough | 13:14 |
| asac | gnomefreak: we need full license | 13:14 |
| asac | in top level dir | 13:14 |
| gnomefreak | it's in a license block. you want we can easily fix it but i dont if we should add it | 13:14 |
| asac | gnomefreak: do you have mail exchange where author said that? | 13:14 |
| asac | gnomefreak: license block isnt good enough ... we need full license in top level dir in a LICENSE.txt file | 13:15 |
| gnomefreak | asac: not anymore i had posted them in pastebin but im sure they have been expired | 13:15 |
| asac | gnomefreak: otherwise the things are left in limbo for us | 13:15 |
| gnomefreak | do we add them? | 13:15 |
| asac | gnomefreak: do you delete mail exchange? | 13:15 |
| asac | gnomefreak: no authors have to | 13:15 |
| asac | in their .xpi upload | 13:15 |
| gnomefreak | asac: of course other wise i would have too much clutter in mail | 13:16 |
| gnomefreak | that i will email them this week sometime | 13:16 |
| gnomefreak | a list of the ones you tryed to push and were rejected would be nice | 13:16 |
| asac | gnomefreak: you should really forward me if authors reject that idea | 13:16 |
| asac | for whatever reason | 13:16 |
| asac | so i can try to bug them too (maybe i have more luck) | 13:16 |
| gnomefreak | i have 10 or so eextensions | 13:16 |
| asac | gnomefreak: please check ... i just remember chatzill and flashgot | 13:17 |
| asac | but i might have missed one or the other | 13:17 |
| gnomefreak | asac: where do i look | 13:17 |
| asac | gnomefreak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive | 13:17 |
| gnomefreak | i know you didnt push a few but i dont remember what ones they were, | 13:17 |
| asac | thats where archive admins send reject mails | 13:18 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i think i pushed all except those that have a bad branch | 13:18 |
| asac | (e.g. the one where you didnt have any .upstream branch) | 13:18 |
| gnomefreak | asac: i have all upstream branches | 13:18 |
| asac | gnomefreak: rejecting bugmail-extension Jonathan Riddell | 13:18 |
| asac | rejecting chatzilla Jonathan Riddell | 13:19 |
| asac | gnomefreak: those are the too i think | 13:19 |
| asac | two | 13:19 |
| gnomefreak | he rejected due to inceweasel-* already in archive | 13:19 |
| gnomefreak | asac: read bug reports | 13:19 |
| asac | gnomefreak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-December/023517.html | 13:19 |
| gnomefreak | he commented on them | 13:19 |
| asac | gnomefreak: doesnt matter ... the rejection reason is in mail | 13:19 |
| asac | above | 13:19 |
| asac | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-December/023488.html | 13:19 |
| gnomefreak | he should keep reasons the same | 13:20 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i dont mind for bugs ;) ubuntu-archive counts | 13:21 |
| gnomefreak | i commented about him rejecting due to iceweasel packages and after upload he rejected for a differnet reason | 13:21 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i think i clarified to him that iceweasel isnt a problem | 13:21 |
| asac | i think it was just a question | 13:22 |
| gnomefreak | he should have said that on bug report so i would know | 13:22 |
| asac | he rejected because of license | 13:22 |
| gnomefreak | thats why they are there | 13:22 |
| asac | gnomefreak: lets not end up in a meta debate ... as a matter of fact the license is missing ;) | 13:22 |
| asac | everything else i would have punched through and kicked his ass for it ;) | 13:22 |
| asac | gnomefreak: dont ask me why he does that | 13:22 |
| gnomefreak | asac: will be fixed but i jus thought bug reports were ther for thast | 13:23 |
| asac | gnomefreak: me too ... i didnt find any reject reason either until he pointed me to it | 13:23 |
| gnomefreak | i will go and look at them all but i know for a fact atleasst one has it | 13:23 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i asked him on -devel why he does it the way he did it | 13:24 |
| asac | gnomefreak: the two packages above dont have it | 13:24 |
| asac | please ask upstream and remember to CC me | 13:24 |
| gnomefreak | firegpg has a COPY file | 13:24 |
| asac | (at least i dont delete emails ;)) | 13:24 |
| asac | gnomefreak: yes. firegpg is already in ;) | 13:24 |
| gnomefreak | no it isnt | 13:24 |
| asac | (i think) | 13:25 |
| asac | gnomefreak: then it had a problem with the branch | 13:25 |
| gnomefreak | W: Unable to locate package firegp | 13:25 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i explained stuff in detail when i rejected it | 13:25 |
| gnomefreak | oops forget e | 13:25 |
| gnomefreak | hold on | 13:25 |
| gnomefreak | gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/firegpg/work/firegpg.ubuntu$ policy firegpg | 13:25 |
| gnomefreak | W: Unable to locate package firegpg | 13:25 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i rejected a branch because you didnt do bzr merge for new upstream sources | 13:25 |
| gnomefreak | gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/flashgot/work/flashgot.ubuntu$ ls | 13:26 |
| asac | not sure if that was firegpg | 13:26 |
| gnomefreak | FlashGot_License.txt | 13:26 |
| asac | thats good | 13:26 |
| gnomefreak | but rejected | 13:26 |
| gnomefreak | for that reason | 13:26 |
| asac | gnomefreak: yes. because there are non-free things in there | 13:26 |
| gnomefreak | 2 off top of looking due to placement of extensions in my dir | 13:27 |
| gnomefreak | they were removed | 13:27 |
| gnomefreak | se branch or changelog | 13:27 |
| asac | gnomefreak: not in the branch that i looked at | 13:27 |
| asac | there were still files with non-free license in it | 13:27 |
| gnomefreak | what ones? | 13:27 |
| asac | gnomefreak: dont know out of my mind ... i gave you detailed reasons in my merge reject | 13:27 |
| * gnomefreak didnt see any other ones that were obvious | 13:27 | |
| asac | iirc | 13:28 |
| asac | gnomefreak: lets do it this way: | 13:28 |
| asac | 1. you give me a list of branches that you hav that are still not sponsored | 13:28 |
| asac | 2. i send you mail for each branch what is wrong | 13:28 |
| asac | 3. you keep those mails and dont delete them ;) | 13:28 |
| asac | does that work? | 13:28 |
| gnomefreak | yes i will email them to you | 13:29 |
| gnomefreak | since you stated all were rejected i will send you all of them, not sure what ones you havent pushed | 13:30 |
| asac | thanks | 13:30 |
| asac | gnomefreak: ok | 13:30 |
| gnomefreak | upstream or ubuntu? | 13:30 |
| gnomefreak | ubuntu should be fine | 13:31 |
| gnomefreak | i see chatzilla issue. when i asked for merge you said just overwrite mine with devels and devels didnt have my changes | 13:33 |
| gnomefreak | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/flashgot.ubuntu is good no? | 13:34 |
| asac | gnomefreak: let me check | 13:35 |
| asac | gnomefreak: chatzilla is technically good ... just missing license in top level | 13:36 |
| asac | of .upstream | 13:36 |
| asac | gnomefreak: the files you removed need to be removed from .upstream | 13:36 |
| asac | not from .ubuntu | 13:36 |
| asac | (in flashgot) | 13:36 |
| gnomefreak | asac: it has the COPYING file in top level | 13:45 |
| gnomefreak | but i will fix branches since i still have my .ubuntu dirs just renamed | 13:46 |
| gnomefreak | and you can merge them at that point | 13:46 |
| gnomefreak | sorry chatzills is the components file | 13:47 |
| gnomefreak | i think it was flashgot witht eh COPYING file but i will work on this this week sometime. i have bad days monday and tuesday due to somethign with my goddaughter that i really need to take care of but you will get meail this week | 13:49 |
| gnomefreak | i have to get moving today or i wont get anything donw | 13:49 |
| gnomefreak | done | 13:49 |
| gnomefreak | adding to my to do list | 13:50 |
| asac | gnomefreak: flashgot you have to fix the .upstream branch .... and then merge that to the .ubuntu branch | 13:50 |
| gnomefreak | k | 13:50 |
| asac | (yes there is no upstream branch, but yo ucan get it by branching revision 1) | 13:50 |
| gnomefreak | it only has 1 revision i have .ubuntu branch fixed but i will merge them once i fix upstream | 13:51 |
| gnomefreak | 5. Fix upstream Flashgot branch than merge with ubuntu branch | 13:54 |
| gnomefreak | 6. send email to Alexander with all branches for extensions | 13:54 |
| gnomefreak | & Check all for license.txt or COPYING files in top level dir. | 13:54 |
| gnomefreak | 7. If none send email to autors to add one | 13:54 |
| gnomefreak | am i forgetting somethiing? | 13:54 |
| gnomefreak | first 4 is wiki work | 13:56 |
| gnomefreak | ok im gone for the day atleast most of it | 13:57 |
| Jazzva | crimsun: if I set "Digital Input Source" to "Analog Inputs", then "Mic" in "Input Source" is built-in front mic, and "Front Mic" is external mic. I don't think I have that digital mic array, as I think those are in the top of the display. I can set "Digital Input Source" to "Digital Mic 1" or "Digital Mic 2", too, but I don't think it does anything. | 14:33 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| fta | <asac> gnomefreak: a week or so ago gnome-support didnt work for http:// proto handler <= iirc, i didn't have gnome-support installed | 16:21 |
| fta | [reed], http://pastebin.mozilla.org/600547 rings a bell? | 16:43 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/94392/ | 16:44 |
| fta | asac, ^^ | 16:57 |
| fta | [reed], http://hg.mozilla.org/ is dead :( | 17:59 |
| gavin | works for me | 18:01 |
| fta | 500 Can't connect to hg.mozilla.org:80 (connect: timeout) | 18:01 |
| gavin | and most people in #developers | 18:02 |
| gavin | perhaps you were blocked for spidering it or something? | 18:02 |
| gavin | file a bug at bmo in mozillal.org::Server Operations with your external IP? | 18:02 |
| fta | nope | 18:02 |
| fta | same from work and from home, different networks | 18:03 |
| gavin | try dm-hg01.mozilla.org or dm-hg02.mozilla.org ? | 18:03 |
| fta | same | 18:06 |
| fta | looks like a routing issue. it dies somewhere in level3 near Washington | 18:13 |
| gavin | weird | 18:17 |
| fta | it's back | 18:42 |
| fta | why are the dates going backward ???? | 18:50 |
| fta | http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/shortlog/db553f94394c | 18:52 |
| fta | everything after 2008-12-26 00:15 +0100 is in the past !??? | 18:52 |
| gavin | those are commit times | 19:03 |
| gavin | as in local committs | 19:03 |
| gavin | http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml has the push dates | 19:03 |
| asac | fta: zip hidden? | 19:42 |
| asac | fta: btw, i reproduced your issue | 19:42 |
| fta | asac, which one? | 19:43 |
| asac | fta: immediate "Done" in status bar | 19:43 |
| asac | fta: it went away with prefetch-next = false | 19:43 |
| fta | great | 19:43 |
| fta | hm | 19:43 |
| asac | fta: interestingly it doesnt happen here with prefetch-next = true | 19:43 |
| asac | so must be a combination of prefetch + new X i guess | 19:44 |
| asac | which is somewhat strange | 19:44 |
| asac | network.prefetch-next | 19:44 |
| fta | did you file a bug? | 19:44 |
| fta | or find one? | 19:44 |
| asac | i searched ... didnt find one yet. | 19:44 |
| asac | i wanted to evaluate it a bit more | 19:45 |
| asac | a bit unfortunate that it doesnt happen here where i have a ready for debug debug build :/ | 19:45 |
| fta | i'm trying to isolate the ftbfs... | 19:45 |
| fta | 23071..23135 | 19:46 |
| asac | i think i have to produce a debug build | 19:46 |
| asac | fta: is there something like hg revert? | 19:47 |
| asac | i currently do hg diff | patch -R -p1 ;) | 19:47 |
| asac | that cant be right | 19:47 |
| asac | at least i am using hg quilt queues ;) | 19:49 |
| asac | Bug 294712 | 20:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 294712 in firefox "Firefox does not display images when "Show image" is selected if auto display of images is disabled" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/294712 | 20:27 |
| fta | mozilla bug 470571 | 20:49 |
| ubottu | Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #470571: NotPermitted | 20:49 |
| fta | mozilla bug 432025 | 20:50 |
| ubottu | Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #432025: NotPermitted | 20:50 |
| fta | grr | 20:50 |
| asac | that seems really broken | 21:09 |
| asac | interesting tha there is no upstream bug | 21:09 |
| fta | ? | 21:09 |
| asac | the bug from above ;) | 21:10 |
| asac | the show image thing (reloadimage in 3.2) | 21:10 |
| asac | fta: do you know how this is ment to work? | 21:10 |
| asac | i mean you have the toggle image thing in context menu | 21:11 |
| asac | but that is basically a "blacklist" .. however, there is also preference for not displaying images by default and then maintaining a whitelist | 21:11 |
| asac | ;) | 21:11 |
| asac | i think the "Reload Image" button in context menu is supposed to enable images temporarily | 21:12 |
| asac | does that mean "just for this reload allow load of image"? | 21:12 |
| asac | or does that mean: now enable site (for how long?) | 21:13 |
| fta | hm, there's no "Show image" | 21:13 |
| asac | fta: yes in 3.2 its called "Reload Image" ;) | 21:13 |
| asac | but it has the same underlying broken code | 21:13 |
| asac | that doesnt do much | 21:13 |
| asac | it reloads the frame, but doesnt change any permission or anything | 21:14 |
| asac | but that menu entry is only there if you disable images by default | 21:14 |
| asac | so i guess its really meaning "reload and show image" | 21:14 |
| asac | maybe its supposed to mean: "fetch image now" | 21:14 |
| asac | yes. i think thats what it means | 21:14 |
| fta | if you re-enable the pref, "Reload Image" makes sense | 21:15 |
| asac | damn i think i fond it ;) | 21:17 |
| asac | fta: why reload image? reload suggests that the image is refreshed imo. what it means is: "Display Image" | 21:17 |
| asac | dont you think so ? | 21:18 |
| fta | my ftbfs is in there: http://paste.ubuntu.com/94556/ | 21:18 |
| asac | fta: the ftbfs still looks like system-zip related | 21:23 |
| asac | have you tried to use in-source zip? | 21:24 |
| asac | or isnt deflate/inflate zip stuff? | 21:24 |
| asac | hmm | 21:24 |
| fta | zlib | 21:24 |
| asac | yes | 21:24 |
| asac | so yeah | 21:24 |
| asac | fta: search the dist/ tree ... is there a zlib header floating around in failed build tree? | 21:25 |
| asac | mozilla bug 457170 | 21:33 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 457170 in Tabbed Browser ""Show image" context menu doesn't work when "Load images automatically" is OFF" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457170 | 21:33 |
| * gavin dupes it to mozilla bug 417545 | 21:38 | |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 417545 in General "Ignore image blocking status for the Show Image menu item" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417545 | 21:38 |
| asac | gavin: is ther enothing better than general? | 21:38 |
| asac | ;) | 21:38 |
| asac | ah its assigned at least | 21:38 |
| gavin | what component it's in doesn't matter that much | 21:39 |
| gavin | tabbed browser isn't any more likely to be noticed than general | 21:39 |
| asac | heh ok. | 21:39 |
| fta | asac, it doesn't make sense... http://paste.ubuntu.com/94591/ | 22:07 |
| fta | seems this is the one: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8eb5a5b83a93 | 23:05 |
| fta | gavin, how do I get the details ??? | 23:05 |
| gavin | find the changeset within that merge that caused it? | 23:06 |
| gavin | hg bisect can help | 23:06 |
| gavin | oh, it's the merge changeset itself? | 23:07 |
| gavin | find the parent that's responsible then | 23:07 |
| gavin | http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/edd031c8937c or http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fd979c3768df | 23:07 |
| fta | hmm | 23:08 |
| gavin | it's the non-default one presumably | 23:09 |
| fta | i'm not sure i understand what that 8eb5a5b83a93 commit is. i can't make head or tail of that hg log tree. | 23:47 |
| gavin | hg glog is useful | 23:48 |
| gavin | you need to enable it though in your .hgrc | 23:48 |
| fta | damn, this is a 9 levels merge | 23:52 |
| fta | i give up | 23:55 |
| gavin | are you using hg bisect? | 23:56 |
| gavin | it mostly handles dealing with merges and stuff for you | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!