[00:44] one sound bug down, five million remaining [00:44] :) [00:45] should fix your recording with external mic, too, fta [00:47] i'd prefer the asserts and choppy sound bugs fixed 1st :P [00:49] asac, i have a problem with the branding.. the desktop icon is the abrowser icon unconditionally [00:52] asac, nm [01:56] crimsun, E: alsa-util.c: Error opening PCM device hw:0: Device or resource busy [01:56] E: module.c: Failed to load module "module-alsa-sink" (argument: "device_id=0 sink_name=alsa_output.pci_8086_27d8_sound_card_0_alsa_playback_0 tsched=1"): initialization failed. [01:56] but: [01:56] hrm [01:56] fta@ix:~ $ sudo lsof -n | grep snd [01:56] mixer_app 9089 fta 26u CHR 116,9 13165 /dev/snd/controlC0 [01:57] http://paste.ubuntu.com/94006/ [01:58] crimsun, it crashed while playing o-a [01:58] Dec 28 02:26:54 ix last message repeated 101 times [01:58] Dec 28 02:26:54 ix pulseaudio[9029]: asyncmsgq.c: Assertion 'pa_asyncq_push(a->asyncq, &i, TRUE) == 0' failed at pulsecore/asyncmsgq.c:164, function pa_asyncmsgq_send(). Aborting. [01:59] i was packing a big tarball so it was with a lot of I/O [01:59] fta: thanks [01:59] but it's a dual core, it should not impact the sound === Jazzva_ is now known as Jazzva [03:23] fta: mozilla bug 421611 [03:23] Mozilla bug 421611 in Build Config "Need to be able to run tests on arbitrary build" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421611 [03:32] asac, i'll read that tomorrow, too long :P [03:34] asac, btw, i no longer tweak APPNAME, the profile patch is now as simple as http://paste.ubuntu.com/94045/ [03:35] good [03:35] if that gives what we want ;) [03:35] did they eliminate the "org/product" two-name constrainted finally? [03:35] s/org/vendor/ [03:36] seems like it [03:39] damn so i managed to not trigger click event when this auto activation menu thing happens ... and then its not the cause :/ [03:40] hell whats the reason ;) [03:53] crimsun: noticed that you uploaded a new patch. I think I tried that now (started with trial & error method, removing stac92xx_set_config_reg(...) one by one), but now I'm compiling again. [03:54] -4°C here, brrrr [03:54] fta: same here... was -6 few hours ago. [03:58] crimsun: I tried to copy over all stac92xx_set_config_reg(...) calls from DELL_STAC_BIOS case to DELL_STAC_3ST, and it didn't change anything. the sound was there, but external mic didn't work [03:59] of course, I didn't change that SND_PCI_QUIRK from _3ST to _BIOS [03:59] another reboot... [03:59] damn, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20771571/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20081228r23135%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [04:00] /usr/bin/ld: libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined [04:11] Jazzva: i'm fairly certain your issue with the original patch is caused by spdif collision [04:11] Jazzva: your codec's init setup is completely different, so you can't use the wholesale copying [04:11] noticed that in the new patch, i have to reboot again to test _take3.diff [04:11] Jazzva: this is what i meant by serious regressions =) [04:12] crimsun: heh :). brb [04:17] crimsun: still fading out... [04:18] Jazzva: with take3? [04:19] crimsun: is it possible that it is at some other place in the code, since I tried moving calls of stac92xx_set_... from DELL_STAC_BIOS to DELL_STAC_3ST, and it did nothing (as in the sound was there, no fading out, ext mic not working) [04:19] crimsun: yes, take3 [04:19] Jazzva: well, the problem is in the actual initialisation [04:20] Jazzva: all those were attempts to avoid having to rewrite an init verb table [04:20] looks like i'll have to look into that, though [04:20] Jazzva: per chance do you have a windows INF for that laptop? [04:21] no, I don't think so. I can try to find it... [04:27] crimsun: found two inf files on Dell's download site. I'll upload them and give you the links [04:28] great, thanks [04:28] crimsun: thank you :) [04:28] this is going to suck [04:29] thanks to the reworking of the entire jack infrastructure, any work i do on this for jaunty is thrown away and already obsolete [04:30] crimsun: this is gonna be changed soon? [04:30] Jazzva: it's already obsolete upstream [04:30] current git head has a _completely_ different jack infrastructure [04:30] crimsun: ah... well, if you have to rewrite it later, maybe you don't need to work on it right now... [04:30] i mean, it's a good thing, because the whole jack thing was horrible (and you can see) [04:31] nah, i can rewrite it fairly easily against the new semantics [04:31] it's just fixing it against the old one that's going to hurt =) [04:33] crimsun: www.jazzva.com/ubuntu/stwrt.inf and www.jazzva.com/ubuntu/stwrt64.inf [04:33] thanks [04:34] np [04:35] ok, off for another reboot, to return sound at least. and then off to sleep :). good night [06:22] oh man, i'm an idiot [06:23] Jazzva: ok, so forget the patches; i went back and read the data sheets [06:23] Jazzva: so 'Mic' is your built-in array (digital); 'Front Mic' is actually your _external mic_ [06:24] completely different from the realtek semantics :/ [09:23] * gnomefreak realy hates stupid warning that cant be fixed localely [09:25] j evelution [09:26] camn [11:10] why are people closing our tasks because it was fixed upstream? that should not happen unless it hit our archives === asac_ is now known as asac [13:02] gnomefreak: ++ [13:02] saw that too [13:02] what was his name? [13:02] i commented on them [13:02] (i cant remember) [13:02] not sure off hand give me a minute [13:03] Martin Mai i think [13:03] seems not [13:04] is tbird 3.0 gnome-support integration fixed? [13:04] fta_: ? [13:04] asac: Martin Mai [13:04] i am still on 2.0 [13:04] gnomefreak: oh ... then i was really right ;) [13:04] im on 3.0 and havent seen -gnome-support problems [13:04] asac: yep i was just slow :) [13:04] gnomefreak: just tell him that thats wrong and he has to look at the "fixedx.x.x" tag to check whether it was rolled out to a versoin we ship [13:05] gnomefreak: a week or so ago gnome-support didnt work for http:// proto handler [13:05] e.g. firefox wouldnt open [13:05] i asked him if it was fixed in Ubuntu version and if i get answers i will open them as confirmed [13:05] gnomefreak: did you ask all extension authors for a license file? [13:05] brings me to google search page [13:06] seems like we will not be able to release things without that anymore [13:06] gnomefreak: you can check by looking in upstream task [13:06] asac: yes i have some that either refuse to answer or just havent yet its been over a month or 2 [13:06] mozilla was "fixed3.0.5, verified 3.0.5" in whiteboard [13:06] if it was committed to that tversion [13:06] you can easily check that [13:06] all that i poushed to PPA are done and ready [13:07] by looking in bugzilla bug [13:07] gnomefreak: from the last batch there were a few rejections by archive admins [13:07] did you contact those? e.g. chatzillla [13:07] this is what i get from above link http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=http%3A%2F%2F+proto+handler [13:07] asac: i havent seen emails for them [13:08] gnomefreak: i think everything was rejected [13:08] shouldnt have been [13:08] gnomefreak: so we should go through all branches and see what hasnt a license file ... and ping [13:08] upstream [13:08] define upstream [13:08] author [13:08] extension author [13:08] auther rejected the packages? [13:08] gnomefreak: no ... archive admins [13:09] because of missing license in orig [13:09] none are missing if i put them on PPA [13:09] gnomefreak: dont understand what you mean [13:09] License.txt is there [13:09] in source [13:09] gnomefreak: probably not in .upstream [13:09] tree [13:09] only in .ubuntu [13:09] some are in dir. in source [13:10] we have copyright in debian dir [13:10] gnomefreak: yes thats not good enough ... "upstream" has to add license file to top level dir [13:10] so it is in the orig.tar.gz we produce [13:10] find me the ones that rejected and i will show you where it is [13:10] yes [13:10] gnomefreak: chatzilla [13:10] gnomefreak: i think pretty much all that i uploaded from you [13:11] were rejected because of upstrema doesnt have license file [13:11] well ... i mean in the recent past [13:11] flashgot too [13:11] i think [13:11] chatzilla nd flashgot [13:11] for now [13:11] gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/chatzilla/work/chatzilla.ubuntu/compon [13:11] ents$ [13:11] see that file for license [13:12] gnomefreak: where? [13:12] its a java file only one in there [13:12] in componeents [13:12] gnomefreak: doesnt really matter ... what we need is a upstream license in top level dir [13:12] chatzilla-service.js [13:12] and that needs to be in .upstream ... not just in ubuntu [13:12] gnomefreak: thats not a license file [13:13] gnomefreak: thats a file that has a license header ... but a license file needs to be named: "license.txt or COPYING or something" and requires the full license text [13:13] it has it in there as for separate one we cant add it to source and sutors all said they are there [13:14] gnomefreak: tell them that license headers in files are not explicit enough [13:14] gnomefreak: we need full license [13:14] in top level dir [13:14] it's in a license block. you want we can easily fix it but i dont if we should add it [13:14] gnomefreak: do you have mail exchange where author said that? [13:15] gnomefreak: license block isnt good enough ... we need full license in top level dir in a LICENSE.txt file [13:15] asac: not anymore i had posted them in pastebin but im sure they have been expired [13:15] gnomefreak: otherwise the things are left in limbo for us [13:15] do we add them? [13:15] gnomefreak: do you delete mail exchange? [13:15] gnomefreak: no authors have to [13:15] in their .xpi upload [13:16] asac: of course other wise i would have too much clutter in mail [13:16] that i will email them this week sometime [13:16] a list of the ones you tryed to push and were rejected would be nice [13:16] gnomefreak: you should really forward me if authors reject that idea [13:16] for whatever reason [13:16] so i can try to bug them too (maybe i have more luck) [13:16] i have 10 or so eextensions [13:17] gnomefreak: please check ... i just remember chatzill and flashgot [13:17] but i might have missed one or the other [13:17] asac: where do i look [13:17] gnomefreak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive [13:17] i know you didnt push a few but i dont remember what ones they were, [13:18] thats where archive admins send reject mails [13:18] gnomefreak: i think i pushed all except those that have a bad branch [13:18] (e.g. the one where you didnt have any .upstream branch) [13:18] asac: i have all upstream branches [13:18] gnomefreak: rejecting bugmail-extension Jonathan Riddell [13:19] rejecting chatzilla Jonathan Riddell [13:19] gnomefreak: those are the too i think [13:19] two [13:19] he rejected due to inceweasel-* already in archive [13:19] asac: read bug reports [13:19] gnomefreak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-December/023517.html [13:19] he commented on them [13:19] gnomefreak: doesnt matter ... the rejection reason is in mail [13:19] above [13:19] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-December/023488.html [13:20] he should keep reasons the same [13:21] gnomefreak: i dont mind for bugs ;) ubuntu-archive counts [13:21] i commented about him rejecting due to iceweasel packages and after upload he rejected for a differnet reason [13:21] gnomefreak: i think i clarified to him that iceweasel isnt a problem [13:22] i think it was just a question [13:22] he should have said that on bug report so i would know [13:22] he rejected because of license [13:22] thats why they are there [13:22] gnomefreak: lets not end up in a meta debate ... as a matter of fact the license is missing ;) [13:22] everything else i would have punched through and kicked his ass for it ;) [13:22] gnomefreak: dont ask me why he does that [13:23] asac: will be fixed but i jus thought bug reports were ther for thast [13:23] gnomefreak: me too ... i didnt find any reject reason either until he pointed me to it [13:23] i will go and look at them all but i know for a fact atleasst one has it [13:24] gnomefreak: i asked him on -devel why he does it the way he did it [13:24] gnomefreak: the two packages above dont have it [13:24] please ask upstream and remember to CC me [13:24] firegpg has a COPY file [13:24] (at least i dont delete emails ;)) [13:24] gnomefreak: yes. firegpg is already in ;) [13:24] no it isnt [13:25] (i think) [13:25] gnomefreak: then it had a problem with the branch [13:25] W: Unable to locate package firegp [13:25] gnomefreak: i explained stuff in detail when i rejected it [13:25] oops forget e [13:25] hold on [13:25] gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/firegpg/work/firegpg.ubuntu$ policy firegpg [13:25] W: Unable to locate package firegpg [13:25] gnomefreak: i rejected a branch because you didnt do bzr merge for new upstream sources [13:26] gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/flashgot/work/flashgot.ubuntu$ ls [13:26] not sure if that was firegpg [13:26] FlashGot_License.txt [13:26] thats good [13:26] but rejected [13:26] for that reason [13:26] gnomefreak: yes. because there are non-free things in there [13:27] 2 off top of looking due to placement of extensions in my dir [13:27] they were removed [13:27] se branch or changelog [13:27] gnomefreak: not in the branch that i looked at [13:27] there were still files with non-free license in it [13:27] what ones? [13:27] gnomefreak: dont know out of my mind ... i gave you detailed reasons in my merge reject [13:27] * gnomefreak didnt see any other ones that were obvious [13:28] iirc [13:28] gnomefreak: lets do it this way: [13:28] 1. you give me a list of branches that you hav that are still not sponsored [13:28] 2. i send you mail for each branch what is wrong [13:28] 3. you keep those mails and dont delete them ;) [13:28] does that work? [13:29] yes i will email them to you [13:30] since you stated all were rejected i will send you all of them, not sure what ones you havent pushed [13:30] thanks [13:30] gnomefreak: ok [13:30] upstream or ubuntu? [13:31] ubuntu should be fine [13:33] i see chatzilla issue. when i asked for merge you said just overwrite mine with devels and devels didnt have my changes [13:34] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/flashgot.ubuntu is good no? [13:35] gnomefreak: let me check [13:36] gnomefreak: chatzilla is technically good ... just missing license in top level [13:36] of .upstream [13:36] gnomefreak: the files you removed need to be removed from .upstream [13:36] not from .ubuntu [13:36] (in flashgot) [13:45] asac: it has the COPYING file in top level [13:46] but i will fix branches since i still have my .ubuntu dirs just renamed [13:46] and you can merge them at that point [13:47] sorry chatzills is the components file [13:49] i think it was flashgot witht eh COPYING file but i will work on this this week sometime. i have bad days monday and tuesday due to somethign with my goddaughter that i really need to take care of but you will get meail this week [13:49] i have to get moving today or i wont get anything donw [13:49] done [13:50] adding to my to do list [13:50] gnomefreak: flashgot you have to fix the .upstream branch .... and then merge that to the .ubuntu branch [13:50] k [13:50] (yes there is no upstream branch, but yo ucan get it by branching revision 1) [13:51] it only has 1 revision i have .ubuntu branch fixed but i will merge them once i fix upstream [13:54] 5. Fix upstream Flashgot branch than merge with ubuntu branch [13:54] 6. send email to Alexander with all branches for extensions [13:54] & Check all for license.txt or COPYING files in top level dir. [13:54] 7. If none send email to autors to add one [13:54] am i forgetting somethiing? [13:56] first 4 is wiki work [13:57] ok im gone for the day atleast most of it [14:33] crimsun: if I set "Digital Input Source" to "Analog Inputs", then "Mic" in "Input Source" is built-in front mic, and "Front Mic" is external mic. I don't think I have that digital mic array, as I think those are in the top of the display. I can set "Digital Input Source" to "Digital Mic 1" or "Digital Mic 2", too, but I don't think it does anything. === fta_ is now known as fta [16:21] gnomefreak: a week or so ago gnome-support didnt work for http:// proto handler <= iirc, i didn't have gnome-support installed [16:43] [reed], http://pastebin.mozilla.org/600547 rings a bell? [16:44] http://paste.ubuntu.com/94392/ [16:57] asac, ^^ [17:59] [reed], http://hg.mozilla.org/ is dead :( [18:01] works for me [18:01] 500 Can't connect to hg.mozilla.org:80 (connect: timeout) [18:02] and most people in #developers [18:02] perhaps you were blocked for spidering it or something? [18:02] file a bug at bmo in mozillal.org::Server Operations with your external IP? [18:02] nope [18:03] same from work and from home, different networks [18:03] try dm-hg01.mozilla.org or dm-hg02.mozilla.org ? [18:06] same [18:13] looks like a routing issue. it dies somewhere in level3 near Washington [18:17] weird [18:42] it's back [18:50] why are the dates going backward ???? [18:52] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/shortlog/db553f94394c [18:52] everything after 2008-12-26 00:15 +0100 is in the past !??? [19:03] those are commit times [19:03] as in local committs [19:03] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml has the push dates [19:42] fta: zip hidden? [19:42] fta: btw, i reproduced your issue [19:43] asac, which one? [19:43] fta: immediate "Done" in status bar [19:43] fta: it went away with prefetch-next = false [19:43] great [19:43] hm [19:43] fta: interestingly it doesnt happen here with prefetch-next = true [19:44] so must be a combination of prefetch + new X i guess [19:44] which is somewhat strange [19:44] network.prefetch-next [19:44] did you file a bug? [19:44] or find one? [19:44] i searched ... didnt find one yet. [19:45] i wanted to evaluate it a bit more [19:45] a bit unfortunate that it doesnt happen here where i have a ready for debug debug build :/ [19:45] i'm trying to isolate the ftbfs... [19:46] 23071..23135 [19:46] i think i have to produce a debug build [19:47] fta: is there something like hg revert? [19:47] i currently do hg diff | patch -R -p1 ;) [19:47] that cant be right [19:49] at least i am using hg quilt queues ;) [20:27] Bug 294712 [20:27] Launchpad bug 294712 in firefox "Firefox does not display images when "Show image" is selected if auto display of images is disabled" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/294712 [20:49] mozilla bug 470571 [20:49] Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #470571: NotPermitted [20:50] mozilla bug 432025 [20:50] Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #432025: NotPermitted [20:50] grr [21:09] that seems really broken [21:09] interesting tha there is no upstream bug [21:09] ? [21:10] the bug from above ;) [21:10] the show image thing (reloadimage in 3.2) [21:10] fta: do you know how this is ment to work? [21:11] i mean you have the toggle image thing in context menu [21:11] but that is basically a "blacklist" .. however, there is also preference for not displaying images by default and then maintaining a whitelist [21:11] ;) [21:12] i think the "Reload Image" button in context menu is supposed to enable images temporarily [21:12] does that mean "just for this reload allow load of image"? [21:13] or does that mean: now enable site (for how long?) [21:13] hm, there's no "Show image" [21:13] fta: yes in 3.2 its called "Reload Image" ;) [21:13] but it has the same underlying broken code [21:13] that doesnt do much [21:14] it reloads the frame, but doesnt change any permission or anything [21:14] but that menu entry is only there if you disable images by default [21:14] so i guess its really meaning "reload and show image" [21:14] maybe its supposed to mean: "fetch image now" [21:14] yes. i think thats what it means [21:15] if you re-enable the pref, "Reload Image" makes sense [21:17] damn i think i fond it ;) [21:17] fta: why reload image? reload suggests that the image is refreshed imo. what it means is: "Display Image" [21:18] dont you think so ? [21:18] my ftbfs is in there: http://paste.ubuntu.com/94556/ [21:23] fta: the ftbfs still looks like system-zip related [21:24] have you tried to use in-source zip? [21:24] or isnt deflate/inflate zip stuff? [21:24] hmm [21:24] zlib [21:24] yes [21:24] so yeah [21:25] fta: search the dist/ tree ... is there a zlib header floating around in failed build tree? [21:33] mozilla bug 457170 [21:33] Mozilla bug 457170 in Tabbed Browser ""Show image" context menu doesn't work when "Load images automatically" is OFF" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457170 [21:38] * gavin dupes it to mozilla bug 417545 [21:38] Mozilla bug 417545 in General "Ignore image blocking status for the Show Image menu item" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417545 [21:38] gavin: is ther enothing better than general? [21:38] ;) [21:38] ah its assigned at least [21:39] what component it's in doesn't matter that much [21:39] tabbed browser isn't any more likely to be noticed than general [21:39] heh ok. [22:07] asac, it doesn't make sense... http://paste.ubuntu.com/94591/ [23:05] seems this is the one: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8eb5a5b83a93 [23:05] gavin, how do I get the details ??? [23:06] find the changeset within that merge that caused it? [23:06] hg bisect can help [23:07] oh, it's the merge changeset itself? [23:07] find the parent that's responsible then [23:07] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/edd031c8937c or http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fd979c3768df [23:08] hmm [23:09] it's the non-default one presumably [23:47] i'm not sure i understand what that 8eb5a5b83a93 commit is. i can't make head or tail of that hg log tree. [23:48] hg glog is useful [23:48] you need to enable it though in your .hgrc [23:52] damn, this is a 9 levels merge [23:55] i give up [23:56] are you using hg bisect? [23:57] it mostly handles dealing with merges and stuff for you