[00:44] <crimsun> one sound bug down, five million remaining
[00:44] <fta> :)
[00:45] <crimsun> should fix your recording with external mic, too, fta
[00:47] <fta> i'd prefer the asserts and choppy sound bugs fixed 1st :P
[00:49] <fta> asac, i have a problem with the branding.. the desktop icon is the abrowser icon unconditionally
[00:52] <fta> asac, nm
[01:56] <fta> crimsun, E: alsa-util.c: Error opening PCM device hw:0: Device or resource busy
[01:56] <fta> E: module.c: Failed to load  module "module-alsa-sink" (argument: "device_id=0 sink_name=alsa_output.pci_8086_27d8_sound_card_0_alsa_playback_0 tsched=1"): initialization failed.
[01:56] <fta> but:
[01:56] <crimsun> hrm
[01:56] <fta> fta@ix:~ $ sudo lsof -n | grep snd
[01:56] <fta> mixer_app  9089        fta   26u      CHR      116,9                13165 /dev/snd/controlC0
[01:57] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/94006/
[01:58] <fta> crimsun, it crashed while playing o-a
[01:58] <fta> Dec 28 02:26:54 ix last message repeated 101 times
[01:58] <fta> Dec 28 02:26:54 ix pulseaudio[9029]: asyncmsgq.c: Assertion 'pa_asyncq_push(a->asyncq, &i, TRUE) == 0' failed at pulsecore/asyncmsgq.c:164, function pa_asyncmsgq_send(). Aborting.
[01:59] <fta> i was packing a big tarball so it was with a lot of I/O
[01:59] <crimsun> fta: thanks
[01:59] <fta> but it's a dual core, it should not impact the sound
[03:23] <asac> fta: mozilla bug 421611
[03:32] <fta> asac, i'll read that tomorrow, too long :P
[03:34] <fta> asac, btw, i no longer tweak APPNAME, the profile patch is now as simple as http://paste.ubuntu.com/94045/
[03:35] <asac> good
[03:35] <asac> if that gives what we want ;)
[03:35] <asac> did they eliminate the "org/product" two-name constrainted finally?
[03:35] <asac> s/org/vendor/
[03:36] <fta> seems like it
[03:39] <asac> damn so i managed to not trigger click event when this auto activation menu thing happens ... and then its not the cause :/
[03:40] <asac> hell whats the reason ;)
[03:53] <Jazzva> crimsun: noticed that you uploaded a new patch. I think I tried that now (started with trial & error method, removing stac92xx_set_config_reg(...) one by one),  but now I'm compiling again.
[03:54] <fta> -4°C here, brrrr
[03:54] <Jazzva> fta: same here... was -6 few hours ago.
[03:58] <Jazzva> crimsun: I tried to copy over all stac92xx_set_config_reg(...) calls from DELL_STAC_BIOS case to DELL_STAC_3ST, and it didn't change anything. the sound was there, but external mic didn't work
[03:59] <Jazzva> of course, I didn't change that SND_PCI_QUIRK from _3ST to _BIOS
[03:59] <Jazzva> another reboot...
[03:59] <fta> damn, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20771571/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20081228r23135%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[04:00] <fta> /usr/bin/ld: libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined
[04:11] <crimsun> Jazzva: i'm fairly certain your issue with the original patch is caused by spdif collision
[04:11] <crimsun> Jazzva: your codec's init setup is completely different, so you can't use the wholesale copying
[04:11] <Jazzva> noticed that in the new patch, i have to reboot again to test _take3.diff
[04:11] <crimsun> Jazzva: this is what i meant by serious regressions =)
[04:12] <Jazzva> crimsun: heh :). brb
[04:17] <Jazzva> crimsun: still fading out...
[04:18] <crimsun> Jazzva: with take3?
[04:19] <Jazzva> crimsun: is it possible that it is at some other place in the code, since I tried moving calls of stac92xx_set_... from DELL_STAC_BIOS to DELL_STAC_3ST, and it did nothing (as in the sound was there, no fading out, ext mic not working)
[04:19] <Jazzva> crimsun: yes, take3
[04:19] <crimsun> Jazzva: well, the problem is in the actual initialisation
[04:20] <crimsun> Jazzva: all those were attempts to avoid having to rewrite an init verb table
[04:20] <crimsun> looks like i'll have to look into that, though
[04:20] <crimsun> Jazzva: per chance do you have a windows INF for that laptop?
[04:21] <Jazzva> no, I don't think so. I can try to find it...
[04:27] <Jazzva> crimsun: found two inf files on Dell's download site. I'll upload them and give you the links
[04:28] <crimsun> great, thanks
[04:28] <Jazzva> crimsun: thank you :)
[04:28] <crimsun> this is going to suck
[04:29] <crimsun> thanks to the reworking of the entire jack infrastructure, any work i do on this for jaunty is thrown away and already obsolete
[04:30] <Jazzva> crimsun: this is gonna be changed soon?
[04:30] <crimsun> Jazzva: it's already obsolete upstream
[04:30] <crimsun> current git head has a _completely_ different jack infrastructure
[04:30] <Jazzva> crimsun: ah... well, if you have to rewrite it later, maybe you don't need to work on it right now...
[04:30] <crimsun> i mean, it's a good thing, because the whole jack thing was horrible (and you can see)
[04:31] <crimsun> nah, i can rewrite it fairly easily against the new semantics
[04:31] <crimsun> it's just fixing it against the old one that's going to hurt =)
[04:33] <Jazzva> crimsun: www.jazzva.com/ubuntu/stwrt.inf and www.jazzva.com/ubuntu/stwrt64.inf
[04:33] <crimsun> thanks
[04:34] <Jazzva> np
[04:35] <Jazzva> ok, off for another reboot, to return sound at least. and then off to sleep :). good night
[06:22] <crimsun> oh man, i'm an idiot
[06:23] <crimsun> Jazzva: ok, so forget the patches; i went back and read the data sheets
[06:23] <crimsun> Jazzva: so 'Mic' is your built-in array (digital); 'Front Mic' is actually your _external mic_
[06:24] <crimsun> completely different from the realtek semantics :/
[09:23]  * gnomefreak realy hates stupid warning that cant be fixed localely
[09:25] <gnomefreak> j evelution
[09:26] <gnomefreak> camn
[11:10] <gnomefreak> why are people closing our tasks because it was fixed upstream? that should not happen unless it hit our archives
[13:02] <asac> gnomefreak: ++
[13:02] <asac> saw that too
[13:02] <asac> what was his name?
[13:02] <gnomefreak> i commented on them
[13:02] <asac> (i cant remember)
[13:02] <gnomefreak> not sure off hand give me a minute
[13:03] <asac> Martin Mai  i think
[13:03] <asac> seems not
[13:04] <asac> is tbird 3.0 gnome-support integration fixed?
[13:04] <asac> fta_: ?
[13:04] <gnomefreak> asac: Martin Mai
[13:04] <asac> i am still on 2.0
[13:04] <asac> gnomefreak: oh ... then i was really right ;)
[13:04] <gnomefreak> im on 3.0 and havent seen -gnome-support problems
[13:04] <gnomefreak> asac: yep i was just slow :)
[13:04] <asac> gnomefreak: just tell him that thats wrong and he has to look at the "fixedx.x.x" tag to check whether it was rolled out to a versoin we ship
[13:05] <asac> gnomefreak: a week or so ago gnome-support didnt work for http:// proto handler
[13:05] <asac> e.g. firefox wouldnt open
[13:05] <gnomefreak> i asked him if it was fixed in Ubuntu version and if i get answers i will open them as confirmed
[13:05] <asac> gnomefreak: did you ask all extension authors for a license file?
[13:05] <gnomefreak> brings me to google search page
[13:06] <asac> seems like we will not be able to release things without that anymore
[13:06] <asac> gnomefreak: you can check by looking in upstream task
[13:06] <gnomefreak> asac: yes i have some that either refuse to answer or just havent yet its been over a month or 2
[13:06] <asac> mozilla was "fixed3.0.5, verified 3.0.5" in whiteboard
[13:06] <asac> if it was committed to that tversion
[13:06] <asac> you can easily check that
[13:06] <gnomefreak> all that i poushed to PPA are done and ready
[13:07] <asac> by looking in bugzilla bug
[13:07] <asac> gnomefreak: from the last batch there were a few rejections by archive admins
[13:07] <asac> did you contact those? e.g. chatzillla
[13:07] <gnomefreak> this is what i get from above link http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=http%3A%2F%2F+proto+handler
[13:07] <gnomefreak> asac: i havent seen emails for them
[13:08] <asac> gnomefreak: i think everything was rejected
[13:08] <gnomefreak> shouldnt have been
[13:08] <asac> gnomefreak: so we should go through all branches and see what hasnt a license file ... and ping
[13:08] <asac> upstream
[13:08] <gnomefreak> define upstream
[13:08] <asac> author
[13:08] <asac> extension author
[13:08] <gnomefreak> auther rejected the packages?
[13:08] <asac> gnomefreak: no ... archive admins
[13:09] <asac> because of missing license in orig
[13:09] <gnomefreak> none are missing if i put them on PPA
[13:09] <asac> gnomefreak: dont understand what you mean
[13:09] <gnomefreak> License.txt is there
[13:09] <gnomefreak> in source
[13:09] <asac> gnomefreak: probably not in .upstream
[13:09] <asac> tree
[13:09] <asac> only in .ubuntu
[13:09] <gnomefreak> some are in dir. in source
[13:10] <gnomefreak> we have copyright in debian dir
[13:10] <asac> gnomefreak: yes thats not good enough ... "upstream" has to add license file to top level dir
[13:10] <asac> so it is in the orig.tar.gz we produce
[13:10] <gnomefreak> find me the ones that rejected and i will show you where it is
[13:10] <gnomefreak> yes
[13:10] <asac> gnomefreak: chatzilla
[13:10] <asac> gnomefreak: i think pretty much all that i uploaded from you
[13:11] <asac> were rejected because of upstrema doesnt have license file
[13:11] <asac> well ... i mean in the recent past
[13:11] <asac> flashgot too
[13:11] <asac> i think
[13:11] <asac> chatzilla nd flashgot
[13:11] <asac> for now
[13:11] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/chatzilla/work/chatzilla.ubuntu/compon
[13:11] <gnomefreak> ents$
[13:11] <gnomefreak> see that file for license
[13:12] <asac> gnomefreak: where?
[13:12] <gnomefreak> its a java file only one in there
[13:12] <gnomefreak> in componeents
[13:12] <asac> gnomefreak: doesnt really matter ... what we need is a upstream license in top level dir
[13:12] <gnomefreak> chatzilla-service.js
[13:12] <asac> and that needs to be in .upstream ... not just in ubuntu
[13:12] <asac> gnomefreak: thats not a license file
[13:13] <asac> gnomefreak: thats a file that has a license header ... but a license file needs to be named: "license.txt or COPYING or something" and requires the full license text
[13:13] <gnomefreak> it has it in there as for separate one we cant add it to source and sutors all said they are there
[13:14] <asac> gnomefreak: tell them that license headers in files are not explicit enough
[13:14] <asac> gnomefreak: we need full license
[13:14] <asac> in top level dir
[13:14] <gnomefreak> it's in a license block. you want we can easily fix it but i dont if we should add it
[13:14] <asac> gnomefreak: do you have mail exchange where author said that?
[13:15] <asac> gnomefreak: license block isnt good enough ... we need full license in top level dir in a LICENSE.txt file
[13:15] <gnomefreak> asac: not anymore i had posted them in pastebin but im sure they have been expired
[13:15] <asac> gnomefreak: otherwise the things are left in limbo for us
[13:15] <gnomefreak> do we add them?
[13:15] <asac> gnomefreak: do you delete mail exchange?
[13:15] <asac> gnomefreak: no authors have to
[13:15] <asac> in their .xpi upload
[13:16] <gnomefreak> asac: of course other wise i would have too much clutter in mail
[13:16] <gnomefreak> that i will email them this week sometime
[13:16] <gnomefreak> a list of the ones you tryed to push and were rejected would be nice
[13:16] <asac> gnomefreak: you should really forward me if authors reject that idea
[13:16] <asac> for whatever reason
[13:16] <asac> so i can try to bug them too (maybe i have more luck)
[13:16] <gnomefreak> i have 10 or so eextensions
[13:17] <asac> gnomefreak: please check ... i just remember chatzill and flashgot
[13:17] <asac> but i might have missed one or the other
[13:17] <gnomefreak> asac: where do i look
[13:17] <asac> gnomefreak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive
[13:17] <gnomefreak> i know you didnt push a few but i dont remember what ones they were,
[13:18] <asac> thats where archive admins send reject mails
[13:18] <asac> gnomefreak: i think i pushed all except those that have a bad  branch
[13:18] <asac> (e.g. the one where you didnt have any .upstream branch)
[13:18] <gnomefreak> asac: i have all upstream branches
[13:18] <asac> gnomefreak: rejecting bugmail-extension   Jonathan Riddell
[13:19] <asac> rejecting chatzilla   Jonathan Riddell
[13:19] <asac> gnomefreak: those are the too i think
[13:19] <asac> two
[13:19] <gnomefreak> he rejected due to inceweasel-* already in archive
[13:19] <gnomefreak> asac: read bug reports
[13:19] <asac> gnomefreak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-December/023517.html
[13:19] <gnomefreak> he commented on them
[13:19] <asac> gnomefreak: doesnt matter ... the rejection reason is in mail
[13:19] <asac> above
[13:19] <asac> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-December/023488.html
[13:20] <gnomefreak> he should keep reasons the same
[13:21] <asac> gnomefreak: i dont mind for bugs ;) ubuntu-archive counts
[13:21] <gnomefreak> i commented about him rejecting due to iceweasel packages and after upload he rejected for a differnet reason
[13:21] <asac> gnomefreak: i think i clarified to him that iceweasel isnt a problem
[13:22] <asac> i think it was just a question
[13:22] <gnomefreak> he should have said that on bug report so i would know
[13:22] <asac> he rejected because of license
[13:22] <gnomefreak> thats why they are there
[13:22] <asac> gnomefreak: lets not end up in a meta debate ... as a matter of fact the license is missing ;)
[13:22] <asac> everything else i would have punched through and kicked his ass for it ;)
[13:22] <asac> gnomefreak: dont ask me why he does that
[13:23] <gnomefreak> asac: will be fixed but i jus thought bug reports were ther for thast
[13:23] <asac> gnomefreak: me too ... i didnt find any reject reason either until he pointed me to it
[13:23] <gnomefreak> i will go and look at them all but i know for a fact atleasst one has it
[13:24] <asac> gnomefreak: i asked him on -devel why he does it the way he did it
[13:24] <asac> gnomefreak: the two packages above dont have it
[13:24] <asac> please ask upstream and remember to CC me
[13:24] <gnomefreak> firegpg has a COPY file
[13:24] <asac> (at least i dont delete emails ;))
[13:24] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. firegpg is already in  ;)
[13:24] <gnomefreak> no it isnt
[13:25] <asac> (i think)
[13:25] <asac> gnomefreak: then it had a problem with the branch
[13:25] <gnomefreak> W: Unable to locate package firegp
[13:25] <asac> gnomefreak: i explained stuff in detail when i rejected it
[13:25] <gnomefreak> oops forget e
[13:25] <gnomefreak> hold on
[13:25] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/firegpg/work/firegpg.ubuntu$ policy firegpg
[13:25] <gnomefreak> W: Unable to locate package firegpg
[13:25] <asac> gnomefreak: i rejected a branch because you didnt do bzr merge for new upstream sources
[13:26] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@Development:~/extension_builds/flashgot/work/flashgot.ubuntu$ ls
[13:26] <asac> not sure if that was firegpg
[13:26] <gnomefreak> FlashGot_License.txt
[13:26] <asac> thats good
[13:26] <gnomefreak> but rejected
[13:26] <gnomefreak> for that reason
[13:26] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. because there are non-free things in there
[13:27] <gnomefreak> 2 off top of looking due to placement of extensions in my dir
[13:27] <gnomefreak> they were removed
[13:27] <gnomefreak> se branch or changelog
[13:27] <asac> gnomefreak: not in the branch that i looked at
[13:27] <asac> there were still files with non-free license in it
[13:27] <gnomefreak> what ones?
[13:27] <asac> gnomefreak: dont know out of my mind ... i gave you detailed reasons in my merge reject
[13:27]  * gnomefreak didnt see any other ones that were obvious
[13:28] <asac> iirc
[13:28] <asac> gnomefreak: lets do it this way:
[13:28] <asac> 1. you give me a list of branches that you hav that are still not sponsored
[13:28] <asac> 2. i send you mail for each branch what is wrong
[13:28] <asac> 3. you keep those mails and dont delete them ;)
[13:28] <asac> does that work?
[13:29] <gnomefreak> yes i will email them to you
[13:30] <gnomefreak> since you stated all were rejected i will send you all of them, not sure what ones you havent pushed
[13:30] <asac> thanks
[13:30] <asac> gnomefreak: ok
[13:30] <gnomefreak> upstream or ubuntu?
[13:31] <gnomefreak> ubuntu should be fine
[13:33] <gnomefreak> i see chatzilla issue. when i asked for merge you said just overwrite mine with devels and devels didnt have my changes
[13:34] <gnomefreak> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/flashgot.ubuntu is good no?
[13:35] <asac> gnomefreak: let me check
[13:36] <asac> gnomefreak: chatzilla is technically good ... just missing license in top level
[13:36] <asac> of .upstream
[13:36] <asac> gnomefreak: the files you removed need to be removed from .upstream
[13:36] <asac> not from .ubuntu
[13:36] <asac> (in flashgot)
[13:45] <gnomefreak> asac: it has the COPYING file in top level
[13:46] <gnomefreak> but i will fix branches since i still have my .ubuntu dirs just renamed
[13:46] <gnomefreak> and you can merge them at that point
[13:47] <gnomefreak> sorry chatzills is the components file
[13:49] <gnomefreak> i think it was flashgot witht eh COPYING file but i will work on this this week sometime. i have bad days monday and tuesday due to somethign with my goddaughter that i really need to take care of but you will get meail this week
[13:49] <gnomefreak> i have to get moving today or i wont get anything donw
[13:49] <gnomefreak> done
[13:50] <gnomefreak> adding to my to do list
[13:50] <asac> gnomefreak: flashgot you have to fix the .upstream branch .... and then merge that to the .ubuntu branch
[13:50] <gnomefreak> k
[13:50] <asac> (yes there is no upstream branch, but yo ucan get it by branching revision 1)
[13:51] <gnomefreak> it only has 1 revision i have .ubuntu branch fixed but i will merge them once i fix upstream
[13:54] <gnomefreak> 5. Fix upstream Flashgot branch than merge with ubuntu branch
[13:54] <gnomefreak> 6. send email to Alexander with all branches for extensions
[13:54] <gnomefreak> &  Check all for license.txt or COPYING files in top level dir.
[13:54] <gnomefreak> 7. If none send email to autors to add one
[13:54] <gnomefreak> am i forgetting somethiing?
[13:56] <gnomefreak> first 4 is wiki work
[13:57] <gnomefreak> ok im gone for the day atleast most of it
[14:33] <Jazzva> crimsun: if I set "Digital Input Source" to "Analog Inputs", then "Mic" in "Input Source" is built-in front mic, and "Front Mic" is external mic. I don't think I have that digital mic array, as I think those are in the top of the display. I can set "Digital Input Source" to "Digital Mic 1" or "Digital Mic 2", too, but I don't think it does anything.
 gnomefreak: a week or so ago gnome-support didnt work for http:// proto handler <= iirc, i didn't have gnome-support installed
[16:43] <fta> [reed], http://pastebin.mozilla.org/600547  rings a bell?
[16:44] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/94392/
[16:57] <fta> asac, ^^
[17:59] <fta> [reed], http://hg.mozilla.org/ is dead :(
[18:01] <gavin> works for me
[18:01] <fta> 500 Can't connect to hg.mozilla.org:80 (connect: timeout)
[18:02] <gavin> and most people in #developers
[18:02] <gavin> perhaps you were blocked for spidering it or something?
[18:02] <gavin> file a bug at bmo in mozillal.org::Server Operations with your external IP?
[18:02] <fta> nope
[18:03] <fta> same from work and from home, different networks
[18:03] <gavin> try dm-hg01.mozilla.org or dm-hg02.mozilla.org ?
[18:06] <fta> same
[18:13] <fta> looks like a routing issue. it dies somewhere in level3 near Washington
[18:17] <gavin> weird
[18:42] <fta> it's back
[18:50] <fta> why are the dates going backward ????
[18:52] <fta> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/shortlog/db553f94394c
[18:52] <fta> everything after 2008-12-26 00:15 +0100 is in the past !???
[19:03] <gavin> those are commit times
[19:03] <gavin> as in local committs
[19:03] <gavin> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml has the push dates
[19:42] <asac> fta: zip hidden?
[19:42] <asac> fta: btw, i reproduced your issue
[19:43] <fta> asac, which one?
[19:43] <asac> fta: immediate "Done" in status bar
[19:43] <asac> fta: it went away with prefetch-next = false
[19:43] <fta> great
[19:43] <fta> hm
[19:43] <asac> fta: interestingly it doesnt happen here with prefetch-next = true
[19:44] <asac> so must be a combination of prefetch + new X i guess
[19:44] <asac> which is somewhat strange
[19:44] <asac> network.prefetch-next
[19:44] <fta> did you file a bug?
[19:44] <fta> or find one?
[19:44] <asac> i searched ... didnt find one yet.
[19:45] <asac> i wanted to evaluate it a bit more
[19:45] <asac> a bit unfortunate that it doesnt happen here where i have a ready for debug debug build :/
[19:45] <fta> i'm trying to isolate the ftbfs...
[19:46] <fta> 23071..23135
[19:46] <asac> i think i have to produce a debug  build
[19:47] <asac> fta: is there something like hg revert?
[19:47] <asac> i currently do hg diff | patch -R -p1 ;)
[19:47] <asac> that cant be right
[19:49] <asac> at least i am using hg quilt queues ;)
[20:27] <asac> Bug 294712
[20:49] <fta> mozilla bug 470571
[20:50] <fta> mozilla bug 432025
[20:50] <fta> grr
[21:09] <asac> that seems really broken
[21:09] <asac> interesting tha there is no upstream bug
[21:09] <fta> ?
[21:10] <asac> the bug from above ;)
[21:10] <asac> the show image thing (reloadimage in 3.2)
[21:10] <asac> fta: do you know how this is ment to work?
[21:11] <asac> i mean you have the toggle image thing in context menu
[21:11] <asac> but that is basically a "blacklist" .. however, there is also preference for not displaying images by default and then maintaining a whitelist
[21:11] <asac> ;)
[21:12] <asac> i think the "Reload Image" button in context menu is supposed to enable images temporarily
[21:12] <asac> does that mean "just for this reload allow load of image"?
[21:13] <asac> or does that mean: now enable site (for how long?)
[21:13] <fta> hm, there's no "Show image"
[21:13] <asac> fta: yes in 3.2 its called "Reload Image" ;)
[21:13] <asac> but it has the same underlying broken code
[21:13] <asac> that doesnt do much
[21:14] <asac> it reloads the frame, but doesnt change any permission or anything
[21:14] <asac>  but that menu entry is only there if you disable images by default
[21:14] <asac> so i guess its really meaning "reload and show image"
[21:14] <asac> maybe its supposed to mean: "fetch image now"
[21:14] <asac> yes. i think thats what it means
[21:15] <fta> if you re-enable the pref, "Reload Image" makes sense
[21:17] <asac> damn i think i fond it ;)
[21:17] <asac> fta: why reload image? reload suggests that the image is refreshed imo. what it means is: "Display Image"
[21:18] <asac> dont you think so ?
[21:18] <fta> my ftbfs is in there: http://paste.ubuntu.com/94556/
[21:23] <asac> fta: the ftbfs still looks like system-zip related
[21:24] <asac> have you tried to use in-source zip?
[21:24] <asac> or isnt deflate/inflate zip stuff?
[21:24] <asac> hmm
[21:24] <fta> zlib
[21:24] <asac> yes
[21:24] <asac> so yeah
[21:25] <asac> fta: search the dist/ tree ... is there a zlib header floating around in failed build tree?
[21:33] <asac> mozilla bug 457170
[21:38]  * gavin dupes it to mozilla bug 417545
[21:38] <asac> gavin: is ther enothing better than  general?
[21:38] <asac> ;)
[21:38] <asac> ah its assigned at least
[21:39] <gavin> what component it's in doesn't matter that much
[21:39] <gavin> tabbed browser isn't any more likely to be noticed than general
[21:39] <asac> heh ok.
[22:07] <fta> asac, it doesn't make sense... http://paste.ubuntu.com/94591/
[23:05] <fta> seems this is the one: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8eb5a5b83a93
[23:05] <fta> gavin, how do I get the details ???
[23:06] <gavin> find the changeset within that merge that caused it?
[23:06] <gavin> hg bisect can help
[23:07] <gavin> oh, it's the merge changeset itself?
[23:07] <gavin> find the parent that's responsible then
[23:07] <gavin> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/edd031c8937c or http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fd979c3768df
[23:08] <fta> hmm
[23:09] <gavin> it's the non-default one presumably
[23:47] <fta> i'm not sure i understand what that 8eb5a5b83a93 commit is. i can't make head or tail of that hg log tree.
[23:48] <gavin> hg glog is useful
[23:48] <gavin> you need to enable it though in your .hgrc
[23:52] <fta> damn, this is a 9 levels merge
[23:55] <fta> i give up
[23:56] <gavin> are you using hg bisect?
[23:57] <gavin> it mostly handles dealing with merges and stuff for you