[03:25] I am trying to build something on my PPA for hardy, a build dependency I have set is liblame-dev, which is in hardy (and everything before hardy). But for some reason I am getting a dependency wait on liblame-dev. The only thing different about my ppa is that I have set a dependency for -backports (because I need debhelper >=7). AFAICT, liblame-dev is not in -backports. Is that the issue or could it be something else? [03:26] whcih package are you building? [03:27] fuppes [03:27] what's the PPA address? [03:27] https://edge.launchpad.net/~tgm4883/+archive [03:27] i've just removed the -backports and told i386 to retry [03:28] That's probably due to an undocumented quirk. [03:28] wgrant: the not building against multiverse? [03:28] Any pocket selection other than the default will select only the components allowed for that package in Ubuntu. [03:29] So if it wasn't in multiverse, it won't be able to find liblame-dev. [03:30] so the issue is liblame-dev not being in multiverse? [03:30] no, it is in multiverse [03:30] the issue is that your package isn't. [03:30] or fuppes needs to be set for multiverse [03:30] ah [03:30] And there's no way to do that. [03:31] So you'll need to use 'Default', not 'Backports', until this is fixed. [03:31] yea the svn checkout had everything already set for debian, i've just been fixing dependency issues [03:31] I discussed it with cprov just before everybody went on holiday. [03:31] ah ok [03:31] so i'll have to get debhelper 7 into my ppa for that to work then [03:31] since that is in backports [03:32] Yep. [03:32] That's actually easy now. [03:32] You can copy it directly. [03:32] * wgrant finds the link. [03:32] wgrant: you can't override it the old way, via debian/control? [03:33] Hobbsee: No, it's overridden to main at upload-time. [03:33] oh, lovely [03:33] * Hobbsee mutters something about the feasibility of the opensuse build system, and wondering if it changes it's formats so often, and documents it's changes when it does. [03:33] tgm4883_laptop: You can copy (binaries and all) from https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary?field.name_filter=debhelper&field.status_filter=published or so. [03:34] bah. i can't write valid english today, it appears [03:34] It has overridden to main for more than a year now. [03:34] wow, that long? [03:35] * Hobbsee assumed it was possible to re-override, when they re-introduced the ogre model [03:35] wgrant, awesome, i'll copy that over [03:35] ogre-model was always there, it was just not configurable. [03:35] Now it's configurable and they added an extra quirk just for us to have fun with and debug. [03:36] not to bug you guys too much, but when is multiple ppa's coming out? [03:36] i thought it was gone, as everything went to 'main' by default? [03:36] I'd like an extra checkbox under the pocket selection widgets to disable component overriding and enable components in ogremodel. [03:36] tgm4883_laptop: we don't work for them. We just do some community support, and figure out what they've changed, and not documented, when people bring in build failures that are obtuse. [03:36] tgm4883_laptop: Well, neither of us are LP devs, but it might well be there next month. [03:37] awesome [03:37] I remember hearing a J month, but couldn't remember if it was january or july [03:37] Parts of the changes were backed out for this release, but I believe it's all implemented. [03:38] i'm just looking forward to not having to make minor version number changes for multiple releases and a single upload [03:38] I wouldn't advise using multiple PPAs for that. [03:38] That would break upgrades, for example. [03:38] There are good reasons that you need to do that. [03:38] But in most cases you should just be able to upload it to the oldest release and copy the binaries to the newer ones. [03:39] No more uploads required. [09:59] it seems PPA is down [10:03] gnomefreak: What gives you this idea? [10:03] cant connect to the repos [10:03] Works fine for me. [10:03] hold on ill patebin it [10:04] wgrant: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/601154 [10:04] and my connection to net is fine or i wouldnt be here [10:05] Your Internet connection is broken, or was for a while. [10:05] either apt issue or PPA issue the secuity ones may be due to not being open [10:05] Both work fine for me. [10:05] Try again. [10:05] it was? than why did all but PPA and security only ones that failed [10:06] oops i mean worked [10:06] Or the Canonical DC dropped out for a moment. Either way it's not a PPA problem and not a good topic for here. [10:07] Or your Internet connection revived just before it tried to connect to gb.a.u.c. [10:07] ill try it again i thought PPA was LP server so i figured here would be best for PPA [10:07] PPA is. [10:07] security.u.c is not. [10:07] wgrant: i only asked about PPA [10:08] Given that both appeared to be unconnectable to at the same time, it is likely that the problem was closer to you than germanium. [10:08] will find out [10:11] * gnomefreak found issue it seems router gave a problem but i would have thought it would have dropped me off net. but g/f noticed it [10:11] as for security still ddown but not needed until after elease [10:12] We have been after release for perhaps 4 years now... [10:12] security.ubuntu.com is also not down from here. [10:13] wgrant: i reda it wrong it was gb server meta info changing cc worked [10:14] Pardon? [10:14] s/reda/read [10:14] cc worked? [10:14] But why on earth do I get a 403 for http://security.ubuntu.com/ from some hosts but not others... [10:14] no i used us.* and gb.* both are failing [10:15] They are different hosts. [10:15] same error [10:15] => your connection is probably the problem. [10:15] but the others work? its a server issue by looks of errors [10:15] Traceroute. [10:15] What is the error? [10:15] Unable to find expected entry restrictedi/source/Sources in Meta-index file (malformed Release file?) [10:16] release file is server side [10:16] From which server? [10:16] us and gb [10:16] Pastebin the log, please. [10:17] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/601158 [10:17] You cannot spell restricted. [10:17] oh maybe why i was typing else where it added a letter? [10:18] wgrant: they are default repos i didnt change them [10:18] Perhaps. [10:18] No they aren't. [10:18] You changed them. [10:18] yep trialing i and no i was typing somewhere else but gedit took focus [10:19] deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty main restrictedi [10:19] ENOPARSE [10:19] gedit stole focus when i was typing in another file [10:19] Ah. [10:19] yep works now :) [10:21] thanks wgrant [10:21] Excellent. [10:26] hey [10:28] for a series, if i link an svn repository to launchpad, launchpad will make a bazaar repository out of it? [10:32] todd12: Yes. [10:33] And it will continuously import new changes every few hours. [10:39] okay, does that mean that people can check in to the bazaar copy and those check in will find their way to the svn version? [10:43] wgrant: what i've got is a project in svn and i'd like to keep using svn, without having to manage another repository (bazaar). [10:45] todd12: No, it's read-only. [10:45] Launchpad can't write to your Subversion repository. [10:46] Users can use your Subversion repository through bzr-svn however, and still have write access. [10:46] I do that with the projects to which I have commit access that still use svn. [10:47] wgrant: okay thanks! [10:47] np === neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde [13:55] merry christmas to everyone. i had an idea about a launchpad feature that i wanted to put forward here, before filing it as a launchpad bug: adding another status for launchpad bugs, something like "abandoned". currently, if the reporter(s) of a bug disappear, bugs are marked as invalid [14:35] <_Andrew_> Hi, I'm trying to upload to my ppa however I get the following rejection message, "Not permitted to upload to the RELEASE pocket in a series in the 'SUPPORTED' state." [14:36] <_Andrew_> Anyone know what the problem is? I didn't get this a few months back [14:41] _Andrew_, what version of Ubuntu are you uploading to? [14:41] <_Andrew_> hardy the version I am using [14:42] _Andrew_, are you sure that's what the changelog file says? [14:43] <_Andrew_> cegui (0.6.2~ppa1) hardy; urgency=low [14:44] _Andrew_, are you getting that error via email or on the terminal? [14:44] <_Andrew_> email [14:44] <_Andrew_> I tested the package with pbuilder before sending and there were no problems [14:45] hmm... [14:47] _Andrew_: What command are you using to upload to your ppa? [14:48] <_Andrew_> dput cegui_0.6.2~ppa1_source.changes [14:48] Is cegui_0.6.2~ppa1 the name of your PPA in your dput.cf file? === _Andrew_ is now known as _Andrew [14:49] <_Andrew> The name of the package I am uploading [14:49] <_Andrew> My dput.cf points to my ppa [14:51] Could you pastebin your dput.cf? [14:52] <_Andrew> http://pastebin.com/d300f01e1 [14:53] _Andrew: Do dput cegui_0.6.2~ppa1_source.changes [14:53] I meant dput myppa cegui_0.6.2~ppa1_source.changes [14:53] <_Andrew> ah yes, I forgot "myppa" [14:53] <_Andrew> thanks for the help [14:53] You're welcome [15:10] mm any administrators around? [15:10] hi all [15:11] is it possible to rename a project ? [15:13] danilos, you there [15:13] been having a problem, i commited a version of something a while back 0ubuntu1 of mktorrent i realised it should have been 0ppa1 [15:13] so that if the package ever got into the main repositories it would not conflict, anyways [15:14] i can't seem to delete the stuff in my ppa or commit a fixed up version [15:14] i've been waiting around for days for a launcpad admin to help me :P === tgm4883_laptop_ is now known as tgm4883_laptop [18:52] is there any place in the API to "plug in" to +packagebug pages? [18:56] I could use field.bug_supervisor with python-launchpad-bugs but I wonder if there's a better way to do it with the LP API [19:11] LaserJock, I think all users bug pages are not available through the API yet, I think I filed a bug about it some time ago [19:11] I see [19:11] bug 282178 [19:11] Launchpad bug 282178 in malone "launchpad api: it is impossible to get a list of a users bugs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/282178 [19:42] is it "expected behavior" to not be able to daisy-chain duplications? [19:42] i.e. I get an error when I set a bug that has a dup as a dup [20:27] hi [20:28] is launchpad almost opensource yet? [20:28] meoblast001: I think it's supposed to be in July [20:28] O_o [20:28] meoblast001, no, it will be opened in July or so [20:28] thats too long [20:28] lol [20:29] :( [20:29] some libraries and such will be opened gradually [20:29] i can wait === fawek_ is now known as fawek [22:13] hi === hubuntu is now known as huayra [22:47] Someone pointed me here to ask about this, how can I get my system name changed?