/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/12/29/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftamozilla bug 47135900:06
ubottuMozilla bug 471359 in Build Config "trunk build broken with "libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined"" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47135900:06
Jazzva_jaunty users, are you experiencing mouse icon flickering between hand and regular pointer icons when it's located over a link?00:30
=== Jazzva_ is now known as Jazzva
ftaJazzva, in firefox?00:31
Jazzvayes00:31
ftayes, it seems related to X00:31
JazzvaI was wondering was it FF or X :).00:31
ftait disappeared since I reverted X to pre Dec 1500:32
Jazzvahmm, I hope it will be fixed soon. but I'm too lazy to revert X, it's still not that irritating :)00:33
ftaJazzva, in fact, my cursor was not changed but the status bar was, it changed to "Done"00:33
Jazzvafta: it's working for me...00:34
ftayou are able to see the url when you hover a link?00:34
Jazzvaif the cursor is not flickering..00:34
Jazzva:)00:34
Jazzvaif it's flickering, then the status bar is too, between "done" and the actual link00:35
ftaok so it's the same00:35
ftaJazzva, i guess you could file a bug :) asac experienced the same thing too00:39
Jazzvaagainst X?00:39
ftaxserver-xorg00:41
asacfta: do you know a regression window for the flickering?00:41
ftaxserver-xorg:00:42
fta  Installed: 1:7.4~5ubuntu500:42
fta  Candidate: 1:7.4~5ubuntu900:42
ftaxserver-xorg-core:00:42
fta  Installed: 2:1.5.3-1ubuntu100:42
fta  Candidate: 2:1.5.99.3-0ubuntu300:42
ftaxserver-xorg-input-evdev:00:42
fta  Installed: 1:2.0.99+git20080912-0ubuntu600:42
fta  Candidate: 1:2.1.0-0ubuntu300:42
asacfta: hmm ... and ffox didnt change?00:42
ftanope00:42
asacfta: can you confirm that disabling prefetch makes this go away?00:43
ftai'm no longer impacted00:43
ftai can't unpin X, it crashes far too often00:44
asacJazzva: ^^?00:44
Jazzvaasac: you want me to revert X to 1:74~5ubuntu5?00:45
Jazzvaxserver-xorg, and xserver-xorg-core to -1ubuntu1?00:46
ftano, disable prefetch in ff prefs00:46
Jazzvaok, I'll test a bit00:46
Jazzvafta: that's the network.prefetch-next parameter?00:47
asacyes00:47
asacmake that false and restart ffox00:47
asacand check whether this makes it go away00:47
Jazzvaright, still flickers00:47
asacstrange ... for me it always went a way ;)00:47
asacso back to square one .... can we somehow capture X events?00:47
Jazzvawell, I expirienced it on the homepage right after starting ff00:47
asacyeah.00:48
Jazzvanow I'm just trying to make it happen again00:48
asaci am already further than thinking that its prefetch00:48
asacits something else00:48
asacJazzva: thtas 3.1 right?00:48
Jazzvahmm, strange, it's not flickering (or I'm just lucky :))00:49
Jazzvaasac: 3.0.500:49
asacreally00:49
asachmm00:49
asachavent seen it there yet00:49
Jazzvaah, it's flickering :)00:49
asacso its probably different bug00:49
asacour flickering makes the status bar when hovering links always bounce back to "Done"00:49
asacand the cursor goes from POINTER -> DEFAULT00:50
asacand back00:50
asacso you cannot see where the link points to in status bar00:50
Jazzvathe status bar is flickering between link and current status ("Reading", "Transferring", "Done", ...)00:50
asacwhen hovering a link or what?00:51
Jazzvawhen you place the cursor over a link. no need to move it after that...00:51
ftaasac, if you care to help with mozilla bug 471359..00:51
ubottuMozilla bug 471359 in Build Config "trunk build broken with "libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined"" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47135900:51
asachttp://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?changeset=8eb5a5b83a9300:55
asacthats the push log00:55
asacfta: i dont understand why the link you attatched to bug doesnt even show all touched files00:56
ftayes, i've spent hours on that already, i'm lost in hg log / hgweb, they contradict each other00:57
asacfta: do you have the hg diff for that?00:58
asacand the hg log?00:58
asaci dont trust what is in web ;)00:58
ftai wonder why they perform such huges merges with a rebase or something00:58
fta-s00:58
ftawithout00:58
asacyeah00:59
asacbig landing ;)00:59
asaci think hg rebasing has just recently been added00:59
asacbut queues would have worked i think00:59
asacbut then you cannot just go on with the branch01:00
asacbut well01:00
asaclook at the automake.mk.in changes01:00
asacSHARED vs STATIC LIBRARY01:00
ftait is supposed to be backed out01:01
asacso are those hidden symbols really from zlib and not from js?01:01
ftadeflate is clearly from zlib01:01
asacfta: which header are those symbols in?01:04
asacinflateEnd01:04
ftazlib.h :)01:04
asacinflateEnd01:04
fta/usr/include/zconf.h01:06
asacfta: do you have config/system_wrappers/zlib.h in your biuld tree?01:13
ftaasac, yes01:14
asaczconf.h?01:14
ftaasac, it's a linker error01:14
ftanot a parser error01:14
asacfta: yes i know01:14
asacstill01:14
asacits important ;)01:14
asacthe wrappers are used to keep symbols from system libs unhidden01:15
asacotherwise they will end up hidden01:15
asacso it could be that you dont have a -I../../config/system_wrappers at compile time or something01:15
ftano zconf.h, not even for the successful builds01:15
asacor the files dont exist01:15
asacfta: thats probably ok01:15
asacif zlib.h includes zconf.h01:16
asacwhich it does as i see now01:16
asacdo you see system_wrappers somewhere in build log?01:16
asacespecially for the compile command that is used to build the stuff linked together here01:17
asac(e.g. mozpng)01:17
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/+build/822941/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20081228r23135+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz01:17
asacfta: are there any zip related headers in dist/ ?01:20
ftanone01:21
asacactually cant really see something in the commit you isolated01:32
asacthat could cause this directlry01:33
asacare you sure you still get the same error when doing it on that commit01:33
asac?01:33
asacespectially since you say that that STATIC SHARED changes have been backed out01:34
fta20081228r23135  NOK01:38
fta20081225r23123  NOK  8eb5a5b83a9301:38
fta20081225r23121  OK   09997a70e4fb01:38
fta20081225r23118  OK   69655376491201:38
fta20081225r23111  OK   7dd3e4a4ceff01:38
ftain http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8eb5a5b83a93, you have the SHARED_LIBRARY_NAME/STATIC_LIBRARY_NAME patch01:40
ftaasac, ^^ + http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/log/9f80cbefc185/config/config.mk01:41
asac73be1c836d7f02:02
asaclanded02:02
asacerr02:02
asacdumb me ;)02:02
asacanyway ... off ... need to reproduce to look02:09
crimsunfta: just committed two patches to my bzr branch for your assert issues in pulseaudio. i am test-building then will toss into ppa.04:49
crimsunJazzva: will look at the mic issue later this evening (16 hrs)05:03
[reed]I'm tired of self-signed cert garbage07:34
* [reed] just wants to reply to that mail to ubuntu-mozillateam@ with "RESOLVED WONTFIX -- EOM"07:34
gnomefreakasac: you up yet?09:41
gnomefreak3 kernels i cant use because of nvidia drivers broken :(09:52
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreakflashgot done justs pushing .ubuntu branch11:56
asacgnomefreak: merge with new .upstream that doesnt have the non-fre files?13:05
asac[reed]: which mail?13:05
asacdidnt get anything about self-signed ;)13:06
asaclet me check archive13:06
asacits indeed there, but i aint have it13:07
* asac checks server13:07
* asac opens =probably-spam13:07
asacfound it there13:08
asac 0.6 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML13:08
asac 1.9 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message13:08
asacdumb man13:08
asacdoesnt manage to send a mail to our mailing list that isnt marked as spam here ;)13:08
gnomefreakasac: yes its all fixed (flashgot)13:10
asacgnomefreak: i dont get that13:19
asac  not wanting it in source13:19
asac    * .bzr-builddeb/default.conf: Added bzr-builddeb revision information13:19
asacwhy is that in a .upstream commit?13:19
asacgnomefreak: what i wanted you to do is to not trash your branch13:20
gnomefreakasac: files were removed and .bzr* added13:20
asacinstead fix .upstream13:20
asacand merge that to .ubuntu13:20
asacyou trashed everything13:20
asacgnomefreak: yes thats wrong13:20
gnomefreakasac: its fixed nothing is wrong atm13:20
asacwhy .bzr added13:20
asacthats the .upstream branch13:20
asacgnomefreak: its wrong that .bzr-builddeb is in .upstream branch13:20
gnomefreakasac: yes no kidding that is where .bzrr-* lives13:20
asacgnomefreak: err ... i am telling you that its wrong13:21
asacyou must not add .bzr-builddeb in a upstream commit13:21
asacyou do that in the packaging committs13:21
gnomefreakasac: asac the .ubuntu branch is fine done right or wrong its the same aws if i merged them13:21
asacgnomefreak: its wrong ;)13:21
asacthe commit 2 is bad13:22
asac.bzr-buiöddeb should not have been there13:22
gnomefreakwhat differece does it make you are adding it to upstream source13:22
gnomefreakeither way13:22
asacgnomefreak: it makes a huge different13:22
asacgnomefreak: for instance now the revision is wrong ... but besides from that its not a "upstream" file13:22
asacits a packaging thing13:22
asacnot wanting it in source13:23
asacwhy do you say that and add that in the same commit13:23
gnomefreakthan ill fix it tomorrow maybe tonight but i doubt it13:23
asacok13:23
gnomefreakasac: it modifies the source package13:23
asacdo you understand what i want ;)?13:24
asaci want commit 1 + remove the files ... then do the packaging and add .bzr-builddeb in those commits ;)13:25
gnomefreakk13:25
gnomefreakupstream commit 1 should have initial release + remove the .cpp and friends than do the .ubuntu packaging and add .bzr-* there13:34
gnomefreakright?13:34
gnomefreakok im gone im late already13:40
ftaasac, wasn't tagged as spam here: X-spam-debug: -2.6 BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.00116:14
asacfta: yes. my html thing is quite high16:44
asacbut i have no direct delivery .... so no grey listing ;)16:45
asacwas it gnomefreak who worked on sunbird 0.9?16:45
asacok found his branch17:05
asacmerged ... continuing17:05
asacok getting antoher coffee17:59
BUGabundoguys did the mozillateam changed FF to FF3.1 in jaunty??18:56
BUGabundoI can't start FF3.0.5 even when using firefox-3.018:56
BUGabundoping asac fta19:00
ftanope, both are in jaunty19:01
ftaBUGabundo, do you see an error when you start 3.0 in a terminal ?19:02
BUGabundoI can't start ff3.0 after opening FF3.119:02
BUGabundofor the last 3 days19:02
BUGabundono error, just a new FF3.1 window!19:02
BUGabundofrom this update firefox-3.1 (3.1~b3~hg20081227r22500+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1) jaunty; urgency=low19:02
BUGabundoxulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1~b3~hg20081227r22500+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1) jaunty; urgency=low19:02
ftahmm19:02
BUGabundoreally anoying19:03
BUGabundoI still have lots of stuff on 3.019:03
BUGabundomainly Awesome Bar history and coockies19:03
BUGabundomeaning to email the list to ask: is there any way I can MERGE 2 or 3 FF profiles?19:03
BUGabundoI want to merge a windows FF3.0, a jaunty 3.0 and jaunty 3.119:04
asacfta: dont we change the app id?19:04
asacso it starts up?19:04
asac(3.1)19:04
ftai recently changed that back to prefer a different profileid, works for me here with 3.0/3.1/3.219:05
asacyes interesting19:05
asacin only see that behaviour with my pristine trunk builds19:05
fta?19:05
BUGabundoI used to have both opened!19:05
BUGabundo3,1 is muc faster for many sites19:05
BUGabundobut some addons still don't work19:06
BUGabundolike tabmixplus and nosquint19:06
BUGabundoplus I have all my history... can't lose that!19:06
asacwell ... when you first started 3.1 it copied your 3.0 profile19:06
BUGabundohuuuu19:06
BUGabundoso long ago19:06
asacif you dont care about the changes in 3.1 since then you can just remove that directory again19:06
BUGabundostill in ibex19:06
BUGabundofrom fta ppa19:06
BUGabundobut I already lots of info on FF3.119:07
BUGabundoolol19:07
BUGabundoI need to merge them eehehehe19:07
asacno way i tugess19:07
asacat some point you have to choose19:07
BUGabundoaddons and bookmarks are already linked19:07
asacBUGabundo: probably a bad idea19:07
BUGabundoI guess ill have to export and import it some how19:07
asacespecially if you want to run both at the same time19:07
ftayou can export and import but be careful not to replace19:07
asacmaybe ... if you find a way to do that let us know19:07
BUGabundobeen working great up until this weekend19:07
asacBUGabundo: i would suggest to look into weave19:08
BUGabundonow, I can't open 3.019:08
asacmaybe that allows you to share bookmarks and synch them between 3.1 and 3.019:08
asacbut please dont link the sqlite files19:08
BUGabundofta I have bzr repo with .mozilla settings19:08
asacthat causes troubles19:08
BUGabundoI won't loose anyting19:08
BUGabundoasac: I haven't linked them19:08
asacah19:08
BUGabundobecause I thought it would be unstable19:09
asac20:07 < BUGabundo> addons and bookmarks are already linked19:09
ftaBUGabundo, i changed something this w-e in 3.1 so i'm curious to understand why it doesn't work for you while it does for me19:09
BUGabundobut not beeing able to have BOTH opened is a night mare!19:09
asacnot sure what you linked for bookmarks then ;)19:09
BUGabundofrom the dir!19:09
* BUGabundo looks at it again... long day... tired19:09
BUGabundoasac: bookmarkbackups is the one linked19:10
BUGabundonot the sqlite for bookmarks19:10
BUGabundofta I'm wiling to provide you with any info I can gather19:10
BUGabundoI did change the engine in gconf19:10
BUGabundoto use the most recent version19:11
ftahm, it works fine with 3.1 and 3.2, not 3.1 and 3.0, interesting19:11
ftaif 3.1 is 1st, 3.0 just opens a new 3.1 window...19:11
BUGabundoyes19:12
BUGabundothat's it!19:12
* BUGabundo installs 3.2 from PPA to have a look at it19:12
BUGabundo34MiBs? uau this packages are growing!19:13
BUGabundofta should I open a bug for it?19:13
ftait's "exec /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.5/firefox" so it's ff acting strange19:13
BUGabundoso we can keep track and other users find it?19:13
ftaBUGabundo, no need, i'll investigate that, should not be that difficult19:14
BUGabundook19:14
ftait's just impacting my ppa so far.19:14
BUGabundobut I'll not know when its fixed!19:14
BUGabundohumm19:14
BUGabundomine is from jaunty repos19:14
BUGabundonope19:15
BUGabundo3.0 is from jaunty, 3.1 is from ppa19:15
asacou shouldnt install jaunty stuff on intrepid19:15
BUGabundo *** 3.0.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0        500 ftp://darkstar.ist.utl.pt jaunty/main Packages19:15
BUGabundo *** 3.1~b3~hg20081227r22500+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1 0        500 http://ppa.launchpad.net jaunty/main Packages19:15
asacwalking home19:15
BUGabundoI'm on jaunty, asac19:15
BUGabundobrb19:28
ftahmm.. it's just 3.1. when i 1st start 3.2, I can start 3.0 as before.19:48
asacgood20:40
asacdarn ... X is sooo slow since last kernel update20:40
asachttp://identi.ca/notice/163660420:40
ftaasac, did you figure out the ftbfs yesterday ?20:57
BUGabundoback from dinner20:59
asacfta: no ... no non-debug build yet here21:06
asacmaybe i will spin it a bit later21:06
asacfirst i have to resolv performance issues21:06
asacits unbearable21:06
asacits like i am having a console on a 33Mhz 386 ;)21:07
ftaBUGabundo, in fact, 3.2 is still using my old trick so it works as expected. the new trick is only in 3.1. strange that it worked for me before..21:07
asacswitching terminal tabs takes about 3 seconds ;)21:07
ftaasac, just boot on the previous kernel21:07
asacgood idea ... lets hope that it was really the kernel ;)21:07
asacstrange though21:07
asaclet me check what changed ;)21:07
BUGabundofta: let me check 3.221:08
BUGabundofta: $ firefox-3.2 *NOTICE* No previous firefox-3.2 profile found, we'll initialize a profile using a copy of your existing 'firefox-3.1' profile. Transfering... done.21:09
BUGabundoFirefox-3.1 is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox-3.1 process, or restart your system.21:09
BUGabundoLOL21:09
asacfta: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/linux/2.6.28-4.5https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/linux/2.6.28-4.5 ... does this mean all those modules are now built-in ?21:10
ftahm, this is not supposed to happen, obviously21:10
asacfta: why is 3.2 basing its profile on 3.1 ... it should be "3.0" i think ... unless there is no 3.0 of course21:10
ftait prefers 3.1, then 3.021:11
BUGabundoasac: since jaunty will have 3.1, I would think it to be a better choice21:12
ftaBUGabundo, could you show me your: grep -E '^(Name|Profile)=' /usr/lib/firefox*/application.ini21:20
asacBUGabundo: thats not known21:20
ftaasac, imho, it makes more sense for 3.2 to 1st try to clone 3.1 before 3.0, it's closer21:21
asacfta: i see that you choose that order, but i don't agree ... the one in main is the default for default users ... and those that do different are supposed to know what they are doing ;)21:21
ftai try both, just 3.1 first21:22
BUGabundogrrrr paste.ubuntu is down again?21:22
ftanope, it's not21:23
BUGabundofta:  http://paste.ubuntu.com/95393/21:23
BUGabundopastebinit is not working with it... again21:23
asacfta: there are two use-cases that conflict:21:23
ftaBUGabundo, 3.2 is wrong.21:23
asac1. users that always want to track latest want the current behaviour21:23
asac2. users that use the non main browsers for testing probably want the other order21:24
ftaBUGabundo, it should read Name=Firefox-3.2, hence the error you got21:24
ftaasac, 3.2 is not meant to enter the repo anytime soon, and by then, 3.1 will use ~/.m/firefox so it does not hurt as it is21:25
asacfta: well ;) whatever you want. i would just like to get a consistent line ;) ... one strategy is always closest version, the other is always main21:26
asacthere is a third way ... we could check which profile is last used21:26
asacand if there is a considerable difference we use the last used one21:26
asacif they are close enough (e.g. no more than a week difference), we use the main ;)21:27
asacbut well ... in the end i dont mind ;)21:27
ftaBUGabundo, i already fixed that in 3.2 but unfortunately, xul 1.9.2 is broken so it needs to be fixed first. in the meantime, you can just edit that file, or just ignore 3.221:27
BUGabundoI'll ignore it21:27
asacjust is a bit strange to base stuff off a "non-default" dir21:27
BUGabundoI just installed it to test21:27
BUGabundowhat about 3.0 vs 3.1 ?21:27
ftaBUGabundo, i guess i have to revert my change until i understand what part of the code is hurting us21:28
ftatoo bad, it was nicer21:28
asacBUGabundo: can you plese test weave for us and report back if its usable etc. ... i want to have a best-practices guide for how to best keep important stuff from different profiles in sync21:29
asac;)21:29
BUGabundolast time I used weave I had LOTS of trouble21:29
BUGabundolinux builds failed a lot21:30
BUGabundoand even windows were non stable21:30
asacalso i think there are still users that have a shared win/linux profile ... i would like to eliminate any of such idea at least from help.ubuntu.com21:30
asacand update it with something more senseful21:30
asacBUGabundo: when did you test?21:30
BUGabundoin the beginning of the year, I'm getting laid off, so I guess I'll have some extra time to test it21:30
asacBUGabundo: thats long time ago ;)21:30
BUGabundoaround july21:30
asacstill long ago i think ;)21:30
BUGabundoIf I'm not mistaken21:31
* BUGabundo checks backups!21:31
asacbut i cannot say ... haven't tested lately due to time constraints21:31
BUGabundoasac: I was saying I could test it again in 200921:31
BUGabundonot that I tested it in jan 0821:31
asacok21:31
BUGabundoif I have some time21:32
BUGabundoI'll test it again on both OSs21:32
BUGabundoand post back to that LP ticket about packageing it!21:32
BUGabundoor here21:32
asaci should really reboot ;)21:56
BUGabundoehheheh21:56
asacmay the build just finish ;)21:56
BUGabundowhy is that asac?21:56
asacso i can reboot ;)21:56
asacthe system is creeping21:56
asaci hope its latest kernel21:56
asachttp://identi.ca/notice/163660421:57
[reed]I'm just tired of my thinkpads both dying21:57
[reed]stupid ubuntu kernel21:58
asactry vanilla kernel21:58
asaci am currently running that on my thinkpad21:58
asacdidnt have much bad experience before though21:58
BUGabundoI have the latest in jaunty21:58
BUGabundoeveryuthing is fine21:58
[reed]I am running vanilla kernel on intrepid21:58
BUGabundoLinux blubug 2.6.28-4-generic #5-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 26 22:48:55 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux21:58
[reed]and it's horrible21:58
asac[reed]: so it didnt help ;)?21:58
BUGabundowhat are you suffenrinf from?21:58
asac[reed]: vanilla kernel from kernel.org?21:59
[reed]asac: oh21:59
asac;)21:59
[reed]basically, both my thinkpads (T60p and X61) just freeze randomly, and the 'A' light just blinks constantly21:59
asacwhats the A light?21:59
[reed]/var/log/messages shows kernel problems21:59
BUGabundokernel panic21:59
BUGabundoare they reported on LP?21:59
[reed]asac: unsure, it looks like a tree21:59
asac[reed]: bios update ;)22:00
BUGabundohave you emailed the kernel team?22:00
[reed]asac: both have the latest bios22:00
[reed]well22:00
[reed]my X61 does22:00
asachmm22:00
[reed]T60p might now22:00
[reed]not22:00
BUGabundo[reed]: pastebin your syslog and kernel log please22:00
asacmaybe the latest is broken then ;) ... its really wierd. i not many issues on my X6122:00
asacand its still running intrepid (but now with vanilla self-baked 2.6.28 kernel)22:00
BUGabundojust jump to jaunty!22:01
asacheh22:01
asacthats probably not the best you can do ;)22:01
asacX is really kicking at me ;)22:01
BUGabundoahh22:01
BUGabundoI didn't upgrade my X yet22:01
BUGabundono nvidia suport22:01
BUGabundostill waiting in UM queue22:01
BUGabundololol22:01
BUGabundoim'm crazy but not *that* crazy22:01
asacholding back stuff is for the weak ;)22:02
BUGabundoeheh22:02
[reed]BUGabundo: ok, give me a bit to pull that together22:02
asactodays update came with fglrx ... i was quite happy22:02
BUGabundoI need nvidia so I can showoff compiz!22:02
[reed]and I need to do something first22:02
asacmaybe it just means i shoulduse that now22:03
BUGabundo[reed]: update-manager -d22:03
asac[reed]: urgh22:03
[reed]I don't want jaunty22:03
asacyeah22:03
BUGabundooh22:03
BUGabundo[reed]: so update-manager -c22:03
[reed][04:00:17PM] <BUGabundo> [reed]: pastebin your syslog and kernel log please22:03
asacthats the best i have heard in the last minutes ;)22:03
BUGabundoLOL22:03
BUGabundoahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh22:03
BUGabundoinstall pastebinit22:03
BUGabundomakes wonders22:03
BUGabundopastebinit -I /var/log/syslog -b ubuntu22:04
[reed]I keep typing yum22:04
asac[reed]: i would really suggest to do what i did ... its completely risk free because you can just boot the ubuntu kernel if it doesnt work out22:04
BUGabundoor something like that22:04
[reed]I work on RHEL machines all day22:04
asacjust spin the kernel.org thing22:04
asacmake menuconfig22:04
asac(just exit ... proper defaults should be there)22:04
asacmake; sudo  make modules_install; sudo make install; sudo update-initramfs -k2.6.28; sudo update-grub22:05
[reed]awesome, pastebinit supports mozilla22:05
[reed]asac: hmm22:05
asacyeah ;)22:05
[reed]asac: ok, I'll do that later22:05
asac[reed]: as a matter of fact the wifi stack in 2.6.27 flopped officially22:05
asaceverybody bit some wood22:05
[reed]2.6.28 better?22:05
[reed]:)22:05
asac[reed]: yes i think so22:05
asacafter a bunch of head banging they seem to calm down a bit ;)22:06
BUGabundo[reed]: I've alias'ed mine to just go to paste.u.c22:06
asac[reed]: also take the network-manager 0.7 final from ~network-manager team PPA22:06
asaca bunch of WPA EAP stuff and VPN things should be fixed now22:07
BUGabundohumm didn't the new intel WIFI driver µcode come into the new kernel?22:07
[reed]BUGabundo: I work for Mozilla, so I use mozilla's pastebin most of the time22:07
BUGabundoI just posted an email to kernel team with some bootcharts22:07
BUGabundocomparing boot speed ups22:07
[reed]asac: ok, will do22:07
asacBUGabundo: no clue about micro code22:07
BUGabundohttp://fileland.bugabundo.net/galeria/v/BUGabundo/Linux/bootchart/22:08
BUGabundoFYI here are some of mine!22:08
fta[reed], yep, i added mozilla and ubuntu to pastebinit a while ago22:15
BUGabundoahh did you ? nice!22:16
BUGabundoshouldn't the ubuntu package default to paste.u.c ?22:16
BUGabundololol22:16
BUGabundoalias pastebinit='pastebinit -b http://paste.ubuntu.com'22:16
BUGabundois there a new version on the bzr?22:17
BUGabundo  Installed: 0.11~bzr46-1~fta122:17
* BUGabundo checks brz22:17
ftaBUGabundo, http://paste.ubuntu.com/95436/22:17
BUGabundowhat am I looking at?22:18
* BUGabundo looks confused!22:18
ftaa way to avoid your alias22:18
ftathis is my ~/.pastebinit.xml22:18
ftaa conf file22:18
* BUGabundo warns noob question22:19
BUGabundowhat's the main diff?22:19
fta?22:19
BUGabundoaint the .bashrc much more portable?22:19
ftaif you prefer. i prefer to set the defaults of my pastebinit, rather than depend on a particular shell22:20
BUGabundomlocate pastebinit.xml  returns nothing on my system!22:20
BUGabundoso I guess its only in yours!22:20
ftayou have to create it22:20
ftai(m showing you mine, as an example22:20
BUGabundoagain "shouldn't the ubuntu package default to paste.u.c ?"22:21
ftai have no strong feeling about that22:23
ftaasac, if i switch to in source zlib/bzip2, i fails on other system libs, hunspell, startup-notification, etc..22:28
fta[reed], fix your code!22:28
fta-i+it22:30
asachah ... perf is so much better with -3 kernel22:36
asacfta: ok22:36
asaclet me pull the strings ;)22:37
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/95446/22:37
asacfta: if i dont use any system libs explicitly will it still happen?22:37
ftaasac, probably not, otherwise i guess upstream would have noticed22:38
crimsunasac: in what way(s) is perf better?22:38
asaccrimsun: well ... in -4 it feels like i dont have DRM ;)22:38
asacerr not even sure if thats the right name22:38
asaccrimsun: everything is really sluggish ... feels like all IO goes through CPU or something ;)22:39
crimsunasac: oh, graphics-wise? using radeonhd?22:39
crimsunfta: also, when you have time, do you mind testing pulseaudio_0.9.13-2ubuntu4~ppa1 in my jaunty ppa to reproduce those assert errors?22:41
asaccrimsun: i use "ati" ... wanted to try fglrx on next boot22:41
ftacrimsun, sure, i will22:42
crimsunfta: thanks much22:42
ftai need to reboot on the new kernel but based on asac's feedbacks, i'm not sure it's wise.22:43
asacfta: Adding configure options from /home/asac/mozilla/hg/mozilla-central/.mozconfig: --enable-application=browser --with-system-zlib=/usr22:43
asacfta: maybe its really just radeon free driver22:43
asacfor me it definitly was Xorg steeling the show (performance wise)22:43
asacbuilding in a screen was quite ok22:44
asacok building with system-zlib22:55
asacok so stuff is more broken than just kernel23:02
ftahttp://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=101178323:03
asaci hope its really software and not bogus hardware (disks, etc.)23:03
ftarebooting, wish me luck23:05
asacgood luck23:05
ftaseems fine23:09
fta\o/23:09
ftahm23:11
ftafirefox-3.2: /build/buildd/cairo-1.8.4/src/cairo-ft-font.c:578: _cairo_ft_unscaled_font_lock_face: Assertion `!unscaled->from_face' failed.23:11
ftaAbort23:11
fta3rd attempt worked. weird23:14
asacok i think having "lo" ifact up before nfs-common is run is essential ;)23:15
asaciface23:15
asacmuch better now ;)23:16
asacat least reboot takes less than 10 minutes now ;)23:16
ftacrimsun, the sound is still choppy in o-a when there are some I/O but it's far better, and no more assert(), thanks!23:28
crimsunfta: excellent!23:29
asacso gnome-terminal was the culprit23:35
asacsnail-slow23:35
asacprobably just means that X is slow though23:35
asacin the end i had a system lock up so i still couldnt reproduce your build error fta :/23:36
fta:(23:37
ftayesterday, i bumped fennec to a223:37
asacthanks23:38
asacfta: can you just push it to universe?23:38
asacor is that now based on 1.9.2?23:38
fta1.9.1 so nothing prevents me to push it to universe23:38
asacfta: what does lintian say?23:39
asac:)23:39
asacdo we have +nobinonly also for fennect?23:39
asacor is that clean?23:39
ftait's clean23:39
ftaW: fennec: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fennec23:39
asack23:40
asaci think we should figure when fennec is going to move to trunk23:40
ftaW: fennec source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends fennec23:40
asacif that happens soon, then we probably will have issues doing at least some basic security support23:40
fta"when fennec is going to move to trunk" ??23:40
asacyes as xul requirement23:41
ftawhy should it ?23:41
asaclike now its against 1.9.1 ... will they track trunk or will they bake first release from 1.9.123:41
asac;)23:41
asacreed is gone ;)23:41
asacthat sucks. i am sure i had a 1.8.0 build here on my laptop23:44
asacnow the tree is gone23:44
ftaeh?23:45
asaci suffer form alzheimer :)23:45
asacmozilla bug             if ! ifconfig | grep ^lo 2>&1; then23:47
asac                ifconfig lo up23:47
asac            fi23:47
asacoops ;)23:47
asacmozilla bug 425046.patch23:47
ubottuError: Could not parse XML returned by Mozilla: not well-formed (invalid token): line 87, column 4 (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=425046)23:47
asacmozilla bug 42504623:47
ubottuError: Could not parse XML returned by Mozilla: not well-formed (invalid token): line 87, column 4 (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=425046)23:47
asacthats bad23:48
ftalol23:51
asacmozilla bug 42500023:52
ubottuError: Error getting Mozilla bug #425000: NotPermitted23:52
asacmozilla bug 42500123:52
ubottuMozilla bug 425001 in Phishing Protection "Tests for bug 400731 use timers, might be fragile." [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42500123:52
asacmozilla bug 42504623:52
ubottuError: Could not parse XML returned by Mozilla: not well-formed (invalid token): line 87, column 4 (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=425046)23:52
ftabad xml indeed23:58
* fta blames reed23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!