/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/12/30/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asacheh00:29
asacdid you look what is broken?00:29
asacfile a bug maybe?00:29
ftai did, there's a raw ^A and it must be escaped00:32
ftawhy do we depend on psmisc?00:34
ftaasac, fennec pushed00:40
ftaasac, so, ff3.2? any progress?00:43
asacfta: yes. i think i found it ... i hope in 20 minutes00:48
asaci know if its the prob00:48
asacgiven that xterm seems to be boosty for my build i hope it will happen in that time00:48
asacat least the fix seems to be used00:49
asacnow we have to wait for final link00:49
asactoo bad ... one more start ;)00:51
* asac shouldnt work in a hacked tree ;)00:52
Nafalloxmas tree!00:52
asacargh00:53
asaci hate me00:53
asaci just cluttered my build tree00:53
asacis there a hg clean-tree?00:53
asacanyway ... restarting build was wrong ;)00:53
asaci looked in wrong tree ... time wasted00:53
asaclets hope the build hurries ;)00:57
asacfta: fennec to universe ;)?01:00
asacgood01:00
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+queue01:01
asacfta: is there a copyright file in top level?01:04
asac;)01:04
asacjust to be sure01:04
asacor LICENSE or whatever01:04
ftano, everything is in debian/copyright01:06
ftait's tri-licensed, as usual01:06
asacwe need it in top level dir of orig01:06
asacwe had 3 rejections because of that01:07
asacin the last two weeks01:07
ftawe?01:07
asacmozillateam (extensions) doesnt fennec include that01:07
asac?01:07
ftano01:07
asacfta: where is the fennec hg?01:08
ftaasac, http://hg.mozilla.org/mobile-browser/01:09
asacyeah most likely will be rejected then ... at least if riddell sees it ;)01:13
asacfiled mozilla bu g47147401:13
asacfiled mozilla bug 47147401:13
ubottuMozilla bug 471474 in General "fennec/mobile-browser hg tree lacks LICENSE file in top-level directory" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47147401:13
asacdarn this build takes ages still01:14
asachurry, hurry01:14
ftait will not be toplevel anyway, xulapp adds a level as the build system is top level01:14
asacfta: well ... thats not so important01:15
asacbuild ssytem should ship a LICENSE_buildsystem file too though01:15
asacwhich says which license the build system parts have and then explicitly refers to the directory that is built01:16
asacfor more LICENSE information01:16
ftaall files have their license in the header01:16
asacyes... but thats uncertainty01:16
asac;)01:16
asacand images for instance usually dont have a license either01:16
asacso they are covered by the general TREE license01:16
asacfta: i am not the one who wants to be hard about it :) ... archive-admins dont like the idea to wade through a zillion of source files to check whether they are all free ;)01:17
ftawell, at least lintian should complain or something01:20
ftawe'll see. if upstream doesn't provide one, why should it be my fault?01:21
asachave you checked lintian output on the source package?01:22
asacfta: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=35476501:24
asacfta: your fault would be that you uploaded a tarball without license ;) ... instead we should have asked upstream to include it first, and then upload :)01:24
asacthough the faultis quite marginal ;)01:24
asacmy fault is that i didnt care before ;)01:25
asacbut maybe its just riddell ... in the end upstream will include it i am sure ;)01:25
asacso as long as we dont loose the ball on that we could let it into the archive imo01:25
asacbut thats not my decision ;)01:25
asaca bit of a lottery.01:25
asacriddel will say no ... pitti ... not sure. maybe yes. seb ... probably yes (but not sure either)01:26
asacdoko probably doesnt look at universe packages ;)01:26
asacthe others in archive-admin are probably not really active atm01:26
asacah hobbsee ... but she only does kde stuff i think01:27
asacfta: will you integrate the patch in to tree? or shall i?01:28
asacif you could do that i would be happy ;)01:28
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/95533/01:29
ftaasac, integrate which patch?01:30
asacfta: the patch i posted to the trunk build bug01:30
asacfta: try lintian on the .dsc01:30
asachmm01:31
asacwell probably doesnt make a difference01:31
ftaasac, trust me, i did: http://paste.ubuntu.com/95534/01:31
asacyeah ... so if we get another reject due to this, we should file a lintian bug01:31
asacyeah01:31
asacfta: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=35476501:31
asacplease confirm that the build works so i can request review01:31
ftatrying01:35
ftaas for fennec, i packaged it Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:18:07 +0200 and no one complained01:35
asacwasnt in the archive01:36
asac;)01:36
ftais that patch complete ??01:38
asacyes should be01:38
asacwhat is missing?01:38
ftalooks like it addresses zlib, but not the other libs01:38
asacfor me the build succeeded01:38
asacwhere do you see zlib?01:38
asacits not even mentioned in the patch ... is it?01:38
asacit fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471359#c101:39
ubottuMozilla bug 471359 in Build Config "trunk build broken with "libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined"" [Normal,Assigned]01:39
ftapatching file js/src/config/Makefile.in01:39
ftapatching file js/src/configure.in01:39
ftapatching file modules/zlib/standalone/Makefile.in01:39
ftaReversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]01:39
asacfta: heh01:40
asacyeah i accidentially included our system zlib patch ;)01:40
asacnow i am a bit buff01:41
asacnot sure what to do01:41
asaci think that patch also belongs there01:41
ftawho did the zlib one?01:42
ftayou did it, it's your call then01:43
ftabzXXX, bad asac01:43
ftabuilding..01:44
asacyes01:45
asaci reattached without it01:45
asacits a different built failure01:45
asaccan you drop it and then see that firefox build fails? ;)01:45
asacnevermind01:45
asacor if you want you can do that ;) ... would be good to verify whether thats still an issue at all (though i think it is)01:46
ftacrimsun, donno if it's p-a but now, mplayer is jerky, it plays fine for a while, then slows down & speeds up a few times, then pauses, it's unwatchable01:58
crimsunfta: ok, will investigate. is mplayer using -ao alsa or -ao pulse?02:11
ftaao=alsa02:11
ftapulse is/was even worse02:12
ftacrimsun, http://paste.ubuntu.com/95564/02:13
ftacrimsun, sometimes, i have to set af=volume=20.1:0 to hear something, especially those .mkv files02:14
crimsunfta: interesting, thanks02:15
ftacrimsun, it's even more than sometimes, i should have said often, i even have a button in my panel to toggle that pref02:16
ftaperl -i -pe 'if (m,(.*?)(af=volume.*),) { if ($1) { s,^$1,, } else { s,^,#, }}'  $HOME/.mplayer/config  :)02:16
crimsunhmm, i wonder if it has to do with the mixing02:16
crimsuni know i spotted an error in the downmixing of channels yesterday; i'll try and generate a new ppa build tonight/tomorrow02:17
ftai have a 5.1 system that i never got to work, i'm using it as a 2.1 :((02:17
ftacrimsun, ^^ + http://paste.ubuntu.com/95568/02:19
crimsunah, you'd have to modify /etc/pulse/default.pa use load-module module-alsa-sink device=surround5102:20
crimsunthat generally means losing hal hotplugging for audio devices, tho' :/02:20
crimsunalthough i do have some hacks from hardy that i could forwardport, but i'd rather just fix module-alsa-* to not race on device release02:21
ftait's a desktop, the only things i hotplug are usb keys/drives or my gps, i don't mind loosing hotplugging for audio devices02:22
crimsunfta: yes, but others likely will =)02:48
ftasure02:52
asactrue ... the mob is never happy ;)02:52
asacthey always want "advanced" features ;) ... like hotplugging etc. :: insane :-P02:52
=== asac_ is now known as asac
whitefta: i was told you should be asked for thunderbird/icedove 3.0 packages? :)11:44
asacwhite: yeah ... so basically what you want is to start with bzr branch lp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head11:46
asacand make a icedove branch out of it ... e.g. by renaming the package et al11:46
asacnext it comes to branding ... there are two options: a) make a "update-orig" rule in debian/rules that replaces tbird with icedove branding11:47
asacor convince fta to include the hook to produce proper icedove orig.tar.gz in mozilla-devscripts11:47
asacthough i thihnk most logic should nowadays go to the packaging and not -devscripts11:47
whiteasac: ok thanks, i'll start looking at it11:52
whiteasac: is there a plan to let icedove and icedove-3.0 coexist? I am just wondering, because of the new binary package names11:55
asacwhite: yes that should work.11:56
asacits even a different source package name11:57
whiteok, i am just a bit surprised11:57
asacwhite: in ubuntu we ship preview stuff in parallel12:00
asacwith stable stuff12:00
whiteah ok, do you intend to do the same for icdeove in debian?12:00
asacnot sure .... but i am sure that its ok to use the same versioning scheme ... and do a transition if we dont do that12:01
asacwhite: are you planning to do a production release based on 3?12:04
whiteasac: it would be nice to have it in experimental and then just rebuild it to get a backport, e.g. for lenny12:05
whiteso possibly productive on lenny, yes12:06
BUGabundo_workfta: ping12:07
BUGabundo_workff3.1 and 3.2 are segfaulting!12:07
BUGabundo_workand only 3.0 is starting12:07
armin76blame asac12:08
BUGabundo_workehhhe12:08
* BUGabundo_work blames asac of FF segfault! :p12:08
asacBUGabundo_work: how do the segfault?12:08
BUGabundo_workarmin76: done12:08
BUGabundo_work$ firefox-3.112:08
BUGabundo_workresults in a single line: "Segmentation Fault"12:09
asacfta: we need -dbg packages everywhere again ;)12:09
asacdidnt you do that yet?12:09
BUGabundo_workahh but a NEW ff3.0 windows opens up12:09
asacsounds like jemalloc12:10
BUGabundo_workso it seems fta referted his change12:10
BUGabundo_workthat made my FF3,1 not allow 3.0 to open12:10
BUGabundo_workand now 3.1 segfaults and opens 3,012:10
* BUGabundo_work reads apt logs12:10
BUGabundo_workI only see an update of 3.1 to 3.2 and xulrunner 1.9.212:11
BUGabundo_workI don't have debug symbols to install to provide more data! :(12:11
asacits a miserable situation with the -dbgsym things12:14
BUGabundo_workyeah12:16
BUGabundo_workaint there even a version on archive?12:16
BUGabundo_workfor jaunty version?12:16
asacBUGabundo_work: yes try the jaunty thing for 3.112:17
BUGabundo_workbut I have 3.1 from ppa12:18
BUGabundo_workits a higher verstion12:19
BUGabundo_workshould I downgrade to archive?12:19
asaci would think so yes12:19
* BUGabundo_work opens synaptic12:19
BUGabundo_workgoing to beta 2 and then instaling debug symbols12:20
BUGabundoasac: firefox-3.1-dbgsym:12:23
BUGabundo  Depends: firefox-3.1 (=3.1~b2+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1) but 3.1~b3~hg20081227r22500+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1 is to be installed12:23
asac--force-depends12:27
asachmm ... try if downgrading makese the segfault go away12:27
fta<BUGabundo_work> so it seems fta referted his change <= no, i didn't, yet12:42
fta<asac> fta: we need -dbg packages everywhere again ;) <= we have them for 3.1 and 3.212:44
asacBUGabundo: ^^12:44
asac;)12:44
asacfta: thx12:44
asacfta: tbird 3 too?12:45
ftahm, yes12:45
ftano12:45
asac@time new_york12:46
ubottuCurrent time in America/New_York: December 30 2008, 07:47:46 - Next meeting: Server Team in 3 hours 12 minutes12:46
ftano segfault here with 3.212:50
asacfta: so i assume the patch was ok?13:12
asacok found comment on bug thanks13:13
asacif i only knew what exactly is going on with the menu thing13:16
asacis there a hg clean-tree?13:17
asachelp13:17
ftayou have a revert but it's not what you want13:18
ftamake clean is probably what you need :)13:19
asacyeah ... let me try that13:20
asaci thin make -f client.mk clean also removes .mozconfig13:20
asacbetter backup that somewhere13:20
ftaso now, all 3 firefox versions open a new window from the current one disregarding the version instead of starting from scratch.13:26
ftabad13:26
ftathey ignore the profile13:27
BUGabundo_workfta: back from lunch13:28
BUGabundo_workwell FF3.1 and 3.2 aree seg faulting when FF3.0 is open. haven't tested with it closed13:28
BUGabundo_workcan't install debug symbols for 3.1 with the error above13:29
BUGabundo  Depends: firefox-3.1 (=3.1~b2+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1) but 3.1~b3~hg20081227r22500+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1 is to be installed13:29
ftathe segfault appears *after* the new window is open so it doesn't matter. the issue is that it's the same version.13:29
ftafirefox-3.1-dbg ?13:30
ftanot -dbgsym13:30
BUGabundo_workopening 3.2 with all FF closes opens it OK13:30
ftayep13:30
BUGabundonsHeaderInfo: registerSelf called!13:30
BUGabundo~$ firefox-3.1  bash: firefox-3.1: command not found13:31
BUGabundoLOLOL13:31
fta?13:31
ftaplease pastebin: sh -x /usr/bin/firefox-3.113:34
BUGabundosh: Can't open /usr/bin/firefox-3.113:35
ftaBUGabundo, then you no longer have the firefox-3.1 package installed13:36
BUGabundohumm13:36
BUGabundoyes!13:36
BUGabundoI think it removed when I tried to install debug symbols13:36
BUGabundoand it failed to downgrade13:36
BUGabundoinstaling again13:36
BUGabundofta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/95955/13:39
BUGabundo$ firefox-3.1 Segmentation fault13:39
ftaok, but i guess your back trace is no more helpful then mine: http://paste.ubuntu.com/95956/13:41
ftathan13:41
asacBUGabundo: you have some extension that provides chrome://dragdropupload/...13:41
asacWelcome to jslib version 0.1.9013:42
asachow do youz get that?13:42
ftahttp://jslib.mozdev.org/13:42
asacyeah probably included by extension then13:43
asacdump that13:43
asacor disable it BUGabundo ^^13:43
ftai'd say it's looking for misery13:43
BUGabundo_workhumm13:43
BUGabundo_workdidn't even knew I had it !13:43
* BUGabundo_work looks at it13:43
asacactually i dont see a segfaultin the paste13:44
BUGabundo_workasac: I can't find that addon!!!13:44
asacBUGabundo_work: disable all ;)13:44
ftaasac, do you know which part of the code is handling the new window thing ? i guess there's a bug in there as it ignores the profile13:44
BUGabundo_workasac: the pastebin is of the script fta asked13:44
asacfta: XRemote stuff13:44
BUGabundo_workWITH all FF closed!13:44
asacfta: there is client and server side13:45
BUGabundo_worksegfault is of 3,1 after I had 3,0 opened13:45
BUGabundo_workasac: If I wanted a NO ADDON browser I would go with chrome13:45
asacfta: /nsGTKRemoteService.cpp13:45
asacand widget/src/xremoteclient13:46
asacXRemoteClient::SendCommand13:46
asacfta: my guess would be that it somehow takes only the string part up to / to build the X property13:47
asacwhich identifies the running instance13:47
BUGabundo_workguys, ping me if you need anything more! brb13:47
asacBUGabundo_work: answer what i asked for13:48
asacwhy dont you disable all addons?13:48
ftaasac, but the thing is i start with exec /usr/lib/firefox-3.1b3pre/firefox-3.113:48
asacits important to figure stuff out13:48
asacthanks13:48
BUGabundo_workasac: for 3.1?13:48
asacfta: what difference does it make13:48
BUGabundo_workok' ill do it!13:49
* BUGabundo_work mumbes something13:49
asacBUGabundo_work: whereever it crashes dude13:49
asac;)13:49
asacidentifying the root cause is the right way to debug stuff13:49
ftaoh, i thought you talked about $013:49
asacand if an extension is the root cause we need to know which13:49
ftai need to run, see you in a few hours13:49
asacfta: no i am talking about the code that finds the window13:49
asac;)13:49
asacand sends a X command to "openwindow" to it13:50
asac;)13:50
ftai see that now. maybe there's already a bug for that13:50
asacunlikely13:50
asacpeople probably dont try to use that mechanism that much as we do ;)13:51
asacBUGabundo_work: so ;)13:52
asacdid it help yet?13:52
ftadamn, it's raining and it's -1°C, i'm looking for troubles too13:55
BUGabundo_workhavenmt tried!13:56
BUGabundo_worklots of work to do13:56
BUGabundo_worklast day of work before laid off!13:56
BUGabundo_workteaching new admin13:56
asacsure13:56
asacfta: so how does the application.ini for 3.1 and 3.2 (in your ppa) now look like?14:25
=== Sergeant_Pony is now known as KB1OHY_Rich
BUGabundo_workguys, have a nice happy new year!17:05
ftaasac, just a Profile field in [App]: http://paste.ubuntu.com/96138/18:00
asacfta: profile is new in 3.1?18:38
asac(i mean code wise)18:39
ftanot sure18:39
asacmost likely ... even if not we have no profile set18:40
asacso its a bug in code18:40
ftaby default, there's no Profile field, even in trunk18:41
asacyes18:44
asacfta: how did you get the idea to do that?18:44
ftasongbird18:45
asace.g. adding Profile=..18:45
asacok18:45
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/96167/18:45
asacfta: fta+bugzilla@sofaraway.org?18:45
ftayes18:46
asacfta: so profile is the "profile" name which is != THE appData->profile thing ;)18:55
asace.g. cannot be used for this18:55
asaceither we have to add a new property to the window (e.g. profilePath ... or something) or we cannot use it18:56
asaci think we should do that for trunk anway19:00
asacwill prepare a patch19:00
asacbut now have to pick up gf19:05
asac[reed]: so tbird was relesaed today ... thats definitly new milestone in crazyness ;)23:25
asaci mean: everybody thought this will go out next week when we went to holiday23:25
asacthen while on holidays for no real reason the release gets fast-pathed and pushed the day before public-holiday (e.g. same as friday release)23:26
crimsunawesome. that means at least half the mozilla-thunderbird bugs go poof!23:27
asachuh?23:27
asac;)23:27
asacah you mean firefworks ;)23:27
asacprobably nobody will complain if email is broken new year ;)23:28
crimsun=)23:32
ftapoor asac ;)23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!