=== fawek|laptop_ is now known as fawek|laptop === fawek|laptop_ is now known as fawek|laptop [03:34] is bazaar offline for maintainence? === flavour changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server. === flavour changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: - | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net [04:00] is bazaar offline? i cant view revisions of branches that i can see in my page on code.lp [04:01] hrm. I thought launchpad wasn't auto-expiring ubuntu bugs now? [04:07] well, LH appears to not display the changesets, so my guess is "yes, it's down" [04:08] ok [04:08] Hobbsee: it hasn't for the ones i've set to Incomplete that have passed the idle period === maco_ is now known as maco [04:09] crimsun: then why is it showing the notice that it will expire bugs if they don't get dealt with in X days? [04:09] Hobbsee: is it saying itll expire them or that they'll be marked for expiration? [04:09] if the latter, it'll just flag them as eligible for expiration, but it still requires manual intervention [04:09] i see "will be marked for expiration..." [04:10] oh, right [04:10] yes, it's marked for expiration [04:11] even though there's no UI marking for bugs that have been 'marked' for expiration, only in the advanced search. OK, got it. [04:25] crimsun: fyi and for maco if they return; source code browsing has been restarted (by one of the others SA [04:25] 's) [04:26] gah. must move return key elswehere on kb :-) [04:27] spm: thank you [10:27] hi, I just wanted to know whether ubuntu rt ticket 3139 (brainstorm upgrade) is publicly viewable or not (username & passwd is known) [10:29] glade88, They are at least widely viewable, although I'm not certain they are public, as such. [10:30] persia: the issue is, a user asks about "when it will be upgraded" and "well, maybe in 2-3 weeks" is an awful reply since I have been saying that since one month now [10:30] so can we throw them the link so that they can monitor themselves? [10:32] refer to: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/16801/ [10:32] I don't know of any link for them. [10:33] Anyway, RT isn't really launchpad. [10:34] we can view the ticket as it was on the moderator ML.. in that case, I'll not provide the link publicly [10:34] ty [14:05] any admins around? [14:19] Kalidarn: you might have better chances to actually get a reply if you say what's the problem :) [14:20] yah ive kinda done that [14:20] 5 or 6 times [14:20] i just wanted to know if there was an admin for launchpad around to help me with a commit problem [14:20] basically i commited some packages to my ppa with badly formatted names [14:20] although ive deleted them, i can't commit any future versions with the proper style [14:21] ie i had 0ubuntu1 in it, instead of 0ppa1 [14:21] this may cause problems if commited [14:21] Kalidarn: try asking here: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [14:21] later on, i was wondering if someone could just completely clean my commit log out [14:21] you might get a quicker reply heh [14:21] some users in #ubuntu-motu [14:21] recommended i ask in here [14:21] something about some bug with launchpad i'd have to check my logs [14:22] as ive kinda forgotten ;) [14:22] exactly. [14:22] and you can't push the version to a newer one? [14:22] that's correct [14:22] it says it uploads the packages fine [14:22] but they dont go anywhere [14:22] i don't get any rejection email [14:22] or accepted one [14:22] initially i got a accepted one with the packages i had committed [14:22] so you removed them and tried with dput -f to upload it again? [14:23] until some users in #ubuntu-motu that were more experienced told me i should change the style [14:23] yeah [14:23] ah i didn't use the -f switch [14:23] i just used dput dcecchin-ppa mktorrent_0.9.9-0ppa1_source.changes [14:23] try with -f to force it [14:24] it says it uploaded fine anyway [14:24] but its not rebuilding them [14:24] what's your ppa? may i take a look? :) [14:24] yeah [14:24] ill just dig it up [14:24] my brain is still on celebration freeze ;) [14:25] hehe [14:25] https://launchpad.net/~dcecchin/+archive [14:25] here we go [14:25] happy new year btw :P [14:26] https://launchpad.net/~dcecchin/+ppa-packages [14:26] its partly there [14:26] there's no packages [14:26] but its still got reference to the ones that were there [14:26] something to do with [14:26] that verion style [14:27] being mktorrent_0.9.9-0ppa1 [14:27] being less than what was used [14:27] so launchpad would not accept it [14:27] hm [14:27] and they mentioned i might have to do something like mktorrent_0.9.9-0+cleaned-ppa1 [14:27] you might need a new epoch [14:27] 1:0.9.9-0ppa1 [14:27] it would have been nice if an admin could use their powers to clean it for me ;) [14:28] i was noob initially and hadn't realised [14:28] it was irreversable [14:28] that and i was also kinda new to the whole debian way [14:28] of doing things :) [14:30] the new epoch number will push it upwards and will allow you to build it [14:30] It doesn't mean anything if your version is "dirty", you can clarify that in the changelog, at least until someone fixes it [14:31] well it doesn't urgently need committing [14:31] i was just doing it out of niceity for others who might have wanted it [14:31] it can wait until someone helps me clean it i'd rather not make a mess of it [14:31] others will still see version 0.9.9 :) [14:32] not that that has been linked anywhere [14:32] i really only put it up so i would have a backup :P [14:32] by the way, you might have a better chance of asking to completely disable/delete your ppa configuration, so that you can re-enable it again afterwards [14:32] yeah [14:32] thats what i was asking [14:33] if my ppa configuration could be completely cleared so i can redo it [14:33] now i know better [14:33] backup? then send it to http://revu.ubuntuwire.net - maybe the package is good enough :) [14:34] I think you can create a team and make a PPA for your team about this software [14:35] https://edge.launchpad.net/people/+newteam [14:39] i might just wait till people are in irc in feb :) [14:39] and then ask [14:39] less work for me ;) === asabil__ is now known as asabil [14:42] well if you send it to revu, you are actually sharing your current work, you can update it anytime, with the same version [14:42] you can get good comments to improve your packaging skills [14:44] Kalidarn: you said you were sent here.. was that from #ubuntu-motu or answers at launchpad or.. both? [14:44] from #ubuntu-motu [14:44] from people that sounded fairly experienced [14:44] have you tried posting in answers? [14:44] nah i havn't :P [14:45] I think things like this should go through there to be properly documented and answered :) [14:45] because it's rather simple if the ppa could be cleared i could post it properly [14:45] need to work with someone to find out more information about it [14:45] cos im not exactly sure why its happening or whats causing it [14:45] then ask for ppa removal from http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad :P [14:46] maybe it's better there, I've no idea, just suggesting :) [14:46] yeah [14:46] well [14:46] will that remove only the ppa [14:46] or anything else? [14:47] I've *no* idea :) there surely must be an admin checkmark to remove a user's ppa :P [14:55] imma go to bed now [15:07] I learn that the bounty system was stopped on LP.. [15:07] any recommendations on other good bounty systems that folks here recommend? [15:12] Need a little help. I have bug 311977 in launchpad. The source package is xfdesktop4, but I get a notice [15:12] Launchpad bug 311977 in xfdesktop4 "Right-click on desktop causes Xfce to stop managing desktop when icons are disabled" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/311977 === sale_ is now known as sale [15:12] asking if I want report it against xfce4 also. There is no option to say no. Where do I report this as [15:12] as bug? [15:14] as bug = a bug [15:15] charlie-tca, At which URL did you get that notice? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/311977 or https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce/+bug/311977 ? [15:15] Ubuntu bug 311977 in xfdesktop4 "Right-click on desktop causes Xfce to stop managing desktop when icons are disabled" [Medium,Triaged] [15:25] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4/+bug/311977 [15:25] Ubuntu bug 311977 in xfdesktop4 "Right-click on desktop causes Xfce to stop managing desktop when icons are disabled" [Medium,Triaged] [15:25] is the one that gave the notice [15:26] Oh, right. That would do it. [15:26] If you put in a URL that is for a different package for a bug, it offers to let you file it against that bug. [15:27] But it does not give the option to say no. The only choice is to say yes. [15:27] The bug number in the upper left was changed to a hyperlink to take you to the official bug URL, but it's not labeled as such. [15:27] Right. Just don't visit those pages: they should only be available by URL hacking anyway. [15:28] OH! Thanks for that information. I see. === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde === fawek_ is now known as fawek === fawek is now known as fawek|away === Guest92631 is now known as Bensawsome === Panattan is now known as AbbaBAbab === AbbaBAbab is now known as uhsudh === uhsudh is now known as Panatta === Panatta is now known as Panattan === sale_ is now known as sale === lan3y is now known as Laney === fawek|away is now known as fawek === panattan_ is now known as Panattan === popey_ is now known as popey [20:29] can somebody help with ppa archive uploading, I had a problem following the instructions? [20:29] I created .dput.cf like on the site and I got [20:29] > dput my-ppa scid_3.6.26_source.changes [20:29] No host my-ppa found in config [20:31] mahfouz: What does the fqdn line look like in .dput.cf? [20:31] Mine is "fqdn = ppa.launchpad.net" [20:31] fqdn = ppa.launchpad.net [20:32] [my-ppa] [20:32] fqdn = ppa.launchpad.net [20:32] method = ftp [20:32] incoming = ~b.a.koenig/ ubuntu/ [20:32] login = Aspirador [20:32] allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 [20:32] oops [20:32] forget about my password [20:32] I will have to change it now :) [20:32] how to I remove my mail signature from launchpad? [20:32] *do [20:32] from my bug reports [20:32] razor1394: you can hide it [20:33] somewhere in the settings [20:34] mahfouz: The only difference I can see is that I have "login = anonymous" [20:34] But I can't see why that would affect the host. [20:34] I was wondering if "login " is always anonymous or if you have to plugin your own password? [20:34] Oh, is there really a space in "~b.a.koenig/ ubuntu/" ? [20:34] yeah, it doesn't even recognize the host [20:35] I tried without space also, but it doesnt even see the host [20:35] The files you're uploading are signed with your key, so you don't need a password. [20:35] aha [20:35] There should be no space though afaict. [20:35] but why doesnt it see my-ppa even though it's the first line? [20:36] I don't know. [20:36] do I have to run dput to read the config file? [20:36] .dput.cf is in your home directory presumably? :) [20:36] ie. ~/.dput.cf [20:36] not in home directory haha [20:36] silly me [20:37] :=) [20:37] mahfouz: I have looked almost everywhere and I can't see any option like that. It's already burnt in to the post :/. [20:37] had too many terminals open [20:38] razor1394: did you try to go to profile and change settings? [20:38] razor1394: what do you mean burnt? :) [20:40] oojah: ok, now next problem > dput my-ppa scid_3.6.26_source.changes [20:40] Can't open /home/bkoenig/.scid/scid-3.6.26-sourceforge/scid_3.6.26_source.changes [20:40] I have a deb in my directory already [20:40] I simply want to upload the deb [20:40] but i have no file ending in source.changes [20:40] ? [20:41] mahfouz: Ah, you only upload source files to ppas. [20:41] how can I check the last time a particular package was updated, in particular this one: http://ppa.launchpad.net/dorins/ubuntu [20:42] oojah: I'm doing this for the first file, what is the source file? The executable? [20:42] andresmh: Try https://launchpad.net/~dorins/+archive [20:42] thanks oojah [20:43] mahfouz - "Hide my email addresses from other Launchpad users." That's all there is to it. I see no info of removing info in posts that are already posted. [20:43] razor1394: I thought it does that also [20:44] razor1394: in my case, it does not show the email address anymore, or which page do you mean? [20:44] mahfouz: Did you follow the PPA guide? https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA [20:44] in general, for packages that are not part of Ubuntu (like http://ppa.launchpad.net/dorins/ubuntu ) would you recommend to add the launchpad PPA to the sources or to just check from time to time the website of the particular software app? [20:44] oojah: thx, let me check again, I only checked the uploading part [20:46] oojah: so I have to use "debuild"? [20:46] Yes [20:46] You might also want to look at this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete [20:46] It's more of a pain in the bum than you're hoping, I'll bet :) [20:47] Well, at least the first time round. [20:47] well, I thought it would be simply since I already have the deb? [20:47] 'fraid not. [20:47] ppas only deal with the source - then they do the build themselves. [20:47] mahfouz: I need to remove the sig put by gmail in the message itself. [20:48] razor1394: please show us what "message" you are talking about [20:49] razor1394: I'd open up a question on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad - the right person will get a chance to help you then. [21:06] oojah: Thanks. It seems there is no way even though users have requested this and It's understandable. There is also no way to remove your account only deactivate it. [21:59] If the current revision of packages-arch-specific in use in Soyuz anywhere public? [21:59] If/Is [22:25] hi exarkun [22:26] hi [22:27] happy new year :) [22:27] back at ya :) [22:32] any launchpad staff here got a minute to answer a couple private questions? [22:38] fumanchu: lol, cant imagine what's on your mind [22:38] I know how to mail beer if you need incentive... ;) [22:39] fumanchu, what's up? [22:41] pm