[00:19] cjwatson_, ping? [01:16] http://zakalwe.fi/pic/ubuntu-scooter.jpg === freeflyi1g is now known as freeflying [02:44] I want to request a backport for cython into Hardy. Should I request a backport of the Intrepid version (which is universe), or the Jaunty version (which is in main)? [04:17] doko__: I just ran across my first module that also ships code to support Python 3. Is there any guidance on packaging modules to work with Python 3? [06:14] * Hobbsee wonders if the ops call needs anything else done === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [11:13] ebroder: whichever works best; the universe->main promotion is probably not directly relevant to backporting in itself [11:14] cjwatson: ot, but Keybuk seems to be on vacation; do you know when he'll be back? === asac_ is now known as asac [11:27] hey cjwatson [11:30] Chipzz: everyone in Canonical is on vacation until at least Monday [11:30] (i.e. Monday is the first general day back) [11:31] cjwatson, w.r.t. to Xubuntu, universe itself seems to be missing from the LiveCD image itself (as in squashfs) [11:31] NCommander: I looked at the live filesystem build log and it definitely fetches packages from universe [11:31] you can look for yourself, it's in http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/ [11:32] NCommander: so perhaps you could answer the specific question I posed in the bug? [11:32] Oh, ok [11:32] Yes, reading now, I think its a red hearing [11:32] * NCommander doesn't pretend to be any expert in liveCDs [11:33] NCommander: what exactly do you mean by universe being missing from the squashfs? [11:33] running apt-cache search *stuff* doesn't reveal anything for universe however when running off the CD. [11:33] please be as precise as you can [11:33] s/for/from/g [11:33] is that the exact problem, or is there something else too? [11:34] Well [11:35] It's a sympton of the problem [11:35] I'm trying to get you to be precise [11:35] None of the Xfce packages are there, running the liveCD gets you to a fvwm session [11:38] ok, there are two problems here [11:38] the first is that livecd-rootfs doesn't construct the final sources.list correctly; I'll fix this tomorrow [11:39] and the second? [11:39] the second is that the archive isn't correctly set up to include Task fields for packages in universe, which I've just fixed [11:39] patience, it's hard to type while carrying a baby :P [11:39] Tasks fields? [11:40] just take my word for it, too fiddly to explain now [11:40] lp_archive@cocoplum:/srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-misc$ sudo -u lp_publish ln -s more-extra.override.jaunty.main more-extra.override.jaunty.restricted [11:40] lp_archive@cocoplum:/srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-misc$ sudo -u lp_publish ln -s more-extra.override.jaunty.main more-extra.override.jaunty.universe [11:41] cjwatson: this means that the new archive reorg has started? [11:41] no [11:41] absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with that [11:41] oh, i thought Task fields would indicate it was. My bad :) [11:41] * cjwatson -> gone for the day [11:42] enjoy === asac_ is now known as asac === azeem_ is now known as azeem === allee_ is now known as allee === apachelogger is now known as movedlogger [18:29] * Booting jaunty from usb does not work on my eee 1000. Tried both unetbootin and "Create a USB startup disk" === asac_ is now known as asac === rjune__ is now known as rjune_ === movedlogger is now known as apachelogger [19:28] hi, should I get the same package if I build a sourcepackage without any modifications ? [19:28] and if I don't get the same thing, should I consider that a bug ? [19:30] Xteven: Depends on what the differences are. [19:30] it crashes with a buffer overflow if I build it myself [19:31] root@guest-laptop:/usr/src# *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/sbin/ircd-ratbox terminated [20:17] Xteven: that's a definite bug, then. === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [20:25] Xteven: at a guess, it could mean that the binary package in the archive was built with an older version of gcc and that a newer version miscompiles it; or that newer library headers break something; or ... === jono_ is now known as jono [20:28] cjwatson: quite possible [20:29] I reported it as a bug :) sooner or later the packager will run into the same problem if he upgrades to a later gcc version [21:41] Greetings. How have your holidays been? [21:41] woops wrong window [21:41] * TheMuso is not obviously back entirely, at least mentally. :p [21:42] my holidays have been fine, how about you? :-) [21:42] LaserJock: Very nice thanks. Its actually good to be back. [21:43] does anyone know whether the "unzoo" package was intentionally removed from intrepid? It appears to have been present in hardy [21:44] hiya LaserJock [21:44] mdke: "Reason: (From Debian) RoM: obsolete, superseded by zoo" [21:44] mdke: hi! long time, no see [21:45] james_w: just found that page, thanks [21:45] LaserJock: yeah :) [21:45] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497775 [21:45] Debian bug 497775 in wnpp "O: unzoo -- zoo archive extractor" [Normal,Closed] [21:57] pitti: hi! :) === sepheebear is now known as Sepheebear [22:16] Xteven: it's an off-by-one [22:18] I wonder if smb will ever come back online? :-) [22:20] crimsun: interesting [22:21] i'm sending the patch to BTS with attribution to F10 [22:22] ? [22:30] Xteven: all relevant info is in the debian & ubuntu bugs. [22:30] Xteven: (presuming you filed #313820) [22:31] aaaaaaah [22:31] F10 -> fedora 10 ? [22:32] yes [22:32] I think I did file that one [22:32] yup [22:32] ok [22:32] well, I'm kindof glad its a bug :) [22:32] every discovered bug makes software more secure [22:32] well, not really [22:32] but I like to think so [22:33] if you want to rebuild your own, grab that patch and add it to debian/patches/ in the extracted source, and make sure to add the filename of the patch to debian/patches/series, too [22:33] I'll try it out [22:35] compiling [22:40] crimsun: patch worked, it doesn't crash anymore [22:41] thx [22:41] Xteven: yw === bobbo_ is now known as bobbocanfly === bobbocanfly is now known as bobbo [23:39] Hi, I just upgraded my cousins computer and she no longer has sound. I have asked several Ubuntu channels and no one seems to have the answer [23:39] seek_therapy: #ubuntu for support. [23:40] No one there could help me [23:40] apparently allot of people are dealing with the same problem [23:41] So.. i am downloading Ubuntu again and am gonna burn the iso and try to reinstall [23:43] seek_therapy: I had a problem like that, it had to do with pulse audio [23:43] do you have a link? [23:44] or can you tell me what you did to fix it [23:44] when i turn her system on .. i hear the drum roll , then when i login ...no sound [23:45] hmm [23:45] not really :( [23:46] but maybe you can find some help on the forums [23:46] and it was pulse audio ? [23:46] I just killed my pulseaudio daemon [23:46] I'm runing without it now, everything works ok [23:46] ubuntu intrepidd [23:47] Xteven: sorry i am new to all this [23:47] np [23:47] I think its best to ask in #ubuntu [23:48] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=964516 [23:49] sure, if they can help.. Sadly, I talked her and her child into using Ubuntu and she was actually starting to like .then this happens [23:53] :( [23:53] might want to look through some logs or so