| maco | er...oh. so you have an @ubuntu and an @kubuntu? | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| nhandler | yeah | 00:00 |
| Hobbsee | nhandler: you are using kubuntu.org, aren't you. | 00:00 |
| Hobbsee | not kubuntu.com? | 00:00 |
| nhandler | Right, I am using kubuntu.org | 00:00 |
| Hobbsee | good ;) | 00:00 |
| nhandler | It was bouncing up until toda | 00:00 |
| nhandler | s/toda/today/ | 00:01 |
| Hobbsee | check your spam? | 00:02 |
| * Hobbsee also notes that setting your @ubuntu.com address as your primary has been known to cause problems in the past, but isn't sure it's still an issue now | 00:03 | |
| nhandler | Hobbsee: I got your email. But for some reason, I still can't get any of the emails I send to nhandler@kubuntu.org | 00:04 |
| * jpds points at the docs he wrote for these kinds of situations: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail | 00:04 | |
| Hobbsee | jpds: oh, thankyou! | 00:05 |
| === leonardr changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: - | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
| nhandler | Hobbsee: Thanks for your help. They were getting put under All Mail and skipping the inbox. Another great gmail feature | 00:09 |
| Hobbsee | nhandler: gotta love gmail's "features" | 00:09 |
| * Hobbsee just autoforwards all mail from there | 00:09 | |
| Peng_ | Is it just me, or are both launchpad-users mailing lists still being used? | 00:18 |
| mthaddon | Peng_: there was a temporary problem with the redirect from the old list to the new one, but it's now been fixed | 00:20 |
| soc | question: | 00:22 |
| soc | i uploaded a package to my ppa, but i got this error via mail: | 00:22 |
| soc | Rejected: | 00:22 |
| soc | Could not find person 'soc-nw-krg' | 00:22 |
| soc | Unable to find distroseries: unstable | 00:22 |
| soc | Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous error. | 00:22 |
| soc | what's wrong? | 00:22 |
| Peng_ | mthaddon: Okay. :) | 00:22 |
| Hobbsee | soc: well, soc-nw-krg doesn't seem to exist, according to launchpad, and launchpad doesn't know about 'unstable', as that's a debian release name, not an ubuntu one. | 00:23 |
| soc | mhhh ... i can't remember using anything of that ... | 00:24 |
| Hobbsee | you would have, in dput.cf which you modified | 00:24 |
| soc | my .dput.cf looks like this: | 00:24 |
| soc | [soc-nw-krg]\n fqdn = ppa.launchpad.net\n method = ftp\n incoming = ~soc-nw-krg/ubuntu/\n login = anonymous\n allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 | 00:24 |
| soc | \n means break | 00:25 |
| Hobbsee | right | 00:25 |
| Peng_ | mthaddon: THanks for the quick response. :) | 00:25 |
| Hobbsee | look at where you have soc-nw-krg in that. | 00:25 |
| soc | yes ... | 00:25 |
| soc | ~soc-krg-nw is the url of my page on launchpad | 00:25 |
| spiv | soc: soc-krg-nw != soc-nw-krg | 00:26 |
| Hobbsee | https://launchpad.net/~soc-nw-krg comes up as a 404 | 00:26 |
| soc | ouch | 00:26 |
| soc | sorry, i'm stupid | 00:27 |
| soc | sure, that's the mistake! | 00:27 |
| Hobbsee | oops ;) | 00:27 |
| soc | now i get "Already uploaded to ppa.launchpad.net" when i try to upload it again ... | 00:28 |
| Hobbsee | use dput -f, but did you fix both errors? | 00:28 |
| soc | that distroseries error? | 00:29 |
| Hobbsee | yes | 00:29 |
| soc | mhh, where can i correct "unstable"? | 00:29 |
| Hobbsee | debian/changelog | 00:29 |
| soc | it's not in the dput.cf | 00:29 |
| soc | ah k | 00:29 |
| Hobbsee | then rebuild your source | 00:29 |
| soc | mom | 00:29 |
| soc | what should it read instead of unstable? | 00:30 |
| soc | main? | 00:30 |
| Hobbsee | which ubuntu release do you want to build for? | 00:30 |
| Hobbsee | intrepid? jaunty? hardy? | 00:30 |
| soc | intrepid/jaunty? | 00:30 |
| soc | i hope the package gets included in jaunty | 00:30 |
| soc | but i hope to use it on my intrepid system | 00:30 |
| Hobbsee | right | 00:31 |
| Hobbsee | so to test it out, start with intrepid | 00:31 |
| soc | ok | 00:31 |
| Hobbsee | then you can copy it to jaunty later, iirc | 00:31 |
| soc | btw, how can i get a package accepted in ubuntu? | 00:31 |
| Hobbsee | new package, or change to existing? | 00:31 |
| soc | new package | 00:32 |
| soc | it doesn't exist in debian | 00:32 |
| Hobbsee | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing#Preparing%20New%20Packages, it appears | 00:33 |
| MTecknology | Hobbsee: Any chance you'd be able to do that little thing on the wiki for me? if you have time? | 00:34 |
| MTecknology | hrm - what's making the LP people so busy? | 00:38 |
| MTecknology | It seems like all of a sudden it's taking a long time to get anything done | 00:39 |
| Hobbsee | MTecknology: holidays, maybe? | 00:39 |
| MTecknology | OH! | 00:40 |
| MTecknology | wow - the worst part is that's an actual epiphany | 00:40 |
| soc | Hobbsee: mhh, the bug already exists ... so i basically have to write a shell script to fetch the source file from the git and clean it? | 00:40 |
| Hobbsee | soc: you need to put the package itself on revu - do a checkout from the git, iirc. | 00:41 |
| * Hobbsee isn't overly familiar with git | 00:41 | |
| soc | ah k | 00:44 |
| CarlFK | lp doesn't have wiki yet. where is the appropriate place to put install instructions? | 01:06 |
| CarlFK | I am thinking either blueprint, check in INSTALL.txt, or maybe open a bug. | 01:07 |
| jamesh | CarlFK: probably neither of those. | 01:25 |
| maxb | What sort of install instructions? I don't think launchpad is supposed to replace a project website entirely | 01:26 |
| jamesh | CarlFK: I'd suggest one of (1) a file inside your branch/tarball, (2) the notes associated with the project release registered on launchpad or (3) the project description on Launchpad | 01:26 |
| CarlFK | jamesh: project description is reasonable. | 01:35 |
| CarlFK | it's really just wget/tar/cd/cd/bzr branch lp.../ | 01:38 |
| CarlFK | maybe i can just link to head%3A/INSTALL.txt | 01:39 |
| soc | *sigh* | 02:17 |
| soc | what's wrong now? | 02:17 |
| soc | Rejected: | 02:18 |
| soc | ttf-droid_1.00~b112-1.dsc: Section 'X11' is not valid\n ttf-droid_1.00~b112.orig.tar.gz: Section 'X11' is not valid\n ttf-droid_1.00~b112-1.diff.gz: Section 'X11' is not valid | 02:18 |
| soc | Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous error. | 02:18 |
| soc | does it make a difference between X11 and x11? | 02:18 |
| Hobbsee | likely | 02:19 |
| Hobbsee | !section | 02:19 |
| ubottu | Sorry, I don't know anything about section | 02:19 |
| soc | damit ... | 02:19 |
| soc | it takes hours to upload that again ... | 02:19 |
| Hobbsee | everything else is, so.. | 02:19 |
| Hobbsee | you can build with -sd if you're not changing the original tarball, and it'll only upload the rest of it | 02:19 |
| Hobbsee | !section is <reply> Please see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections for a list of valid sections that you can use in your debian/control file, for debian packaging | 02:20 |
| ubottu | I'll remember that, Hobbsee | 02:20 |
| soc | grrrrrrrr | 02:34 |
| soc | Rejected: | 02:34 |
| soc | Unable to find ttf-droid_1.00~b112.orig.tar.gz in upload or distribution. | 02:34 |
| soc | Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification. | 02:34 |
| soc | i give up | 02:34 |
| soc | good night | 02:34 |
| CarlFK | oh yeah... I changed my username. so now bzr push doesn't.... | 06:04 |
| CarlFK | how do I straighten that out? | 06:05 |
| jamesh | CarlFK: bzr push --remember lp:whatever | 06:05 |
| jamesh | that'll remember the new location for future invocations | 06:05 |
| CarlFK | http://dpaste.com/105863/ target: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~carlfk/web2conf/badges | 06:08 |
| spiv | CarlFK: you need to do "bzr launchpad-login carlfk" | 06:09 |
| CarlFK | Pushed up to revision 48. - thanks | 06:10 |
| CarlFK | https://edge.launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive installed python-poppler and it didn't apply the patch | 06:54 |
| CarlFK | I think it has something to do with odd build requirements: "apt-get build-dep python-poppler" errored: unmet depandencies | 06:55 |
| CarlFK | but aptitude build-dep python-poppler installed what was needed | 06:55 |
| === al-maisan changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: al-maisan | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| f4 | Hi, to use the "decentralized with human gatekeeper workflow" i have to set me as the owner of the trunk branch right? | 10:03 |
| dlynch | Is it possible to make releases without having any series or milestones? My project is modest - so far, I'm the only developer. | 10:03 |
| f4 | i've got an unruly developper :) | 10:03 |
| jml | f4: that's right. | 10:06 |
| al-maisan | dlynch: what do you mean? | 10:07 |
| f4 | thanks | 10:07 |
| dlynch | al-maisan: I have read the documentation on series and milestones, which concludes by talking about releases | 10:07 |
| al-maisan | aha | 10:07 |
| dlynch | does that mean I cannot make a release from trunk, without using series? | 10:08 |
| al-maisan | dlynch: just a minute.. | 10:09 |
| dlynch | al-maisan: thank you | 10:09 |
| al-maisan | dlynch: I think you will need to have a series at a minimum. | 10:13 |
| dlynch | al-maisan: can i make my "series" be identical to trunk? :) | 10:14 |
| al-maisan | dlynch: "trunk" is really the tip of your source branch and hence a "moving target" | 10:15 |
| dlynch | al-maisan: I understand that part. Does that mean I should get into the discipline of making a new series even if all it does is represent a snapshot of trunk? My project is currently so modest, that's all that a release amounts to | 10:16 |
| al-maisan | if all you want is trunk then there's no need for a relase either | 10:17 |
| al-maisan | trunk means bleeding edge | 10:17 |
| al-maisan | a release has to be identified somehow and that's what a series is there for | 10:17 |
| al-maisan | .. and yes, just checked that, a product release requires a product series. | 10:19 |
| dlynch | thanks for looking into this | 10:19 |
| al-maisan | dlynch: you are welcome. | 10:19 |
| dlynch | and one more thing: the documentation is generally excellent - it sure looks pretty too :) | 10:20 |
| al-maisan | dlynch: oh, thanks :) | 10:21 |
| al-maisan | that's very kind of you! | 10:21 |
| f4 | what about PQM is there a good documentation about it somewhere? | 10:29 |
| al-maisan | f4: PQM is part of the launchpad-internal build/integration test infrastructure. | 10:31 |
| al-maisan | What would you like to know about it? | 10:32 |
| f4 | how it works/how to use it with a laucnhpad project | 10:34 |
| f4 | it looks interesting | 10:34 |
| al-maisan | f4: PQM is used by the team is bulding launchpad proper | 10:34 |
| al-maisan | there is no need to use it with any projects *registered with* launchpad | 10:35 |
| al-maisan | .. by the team *that* is bulding launchpad proper .. | 10:35 |
| LarstiQ | f4: the Bazaar team uses pqm, but I don't think it's possible to use pqm in a fully integrated way with launchpad | 10:37 |
| asabil | hi all | 10:38 |
| f4 | ok i was expecting that since it's not really documented | 10:39 |
| LarstiQ | f4: if you'd want you could set it up yourself, but indeed, it's a bit underdocumented | 10:40 |
| LarstiQ | people have been known to succeed though :) | 10:40 |
| f4 | i was using https://code.launchpad.net/bzr as a "template" for my own project (to see how they work) and they use it | 10:41 |
| LarstiQ | right, we do | 10:41 |
| LarstiQ | f4: the way that is set up, the canonical trunk branch is controlled by pqm and lives at http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev. lp:bzr is then mirrored from there | 10:42 |
| f4 | but anyway i don't need it. we're only 2 working on a small project, should be a few more in a few weeks/month but not much | 10:42 |
| f4 | i was just curious :) | 10:43 |
| LarstiQ | right, pqm is overkill in that situation :) | 10:43 |
| f4 | but i think i'm going to act as gatekeeper because my mate keeps pushing untested/incomplete code on the trunk branch | 10:46 |
| f4 | and it's still interesting to manage it like a big project even if it's not :) i'm still a student i'm here to learn :) | 10:47 |
| LarstiQ | f4: human gatekeeper sounds like a good solution | 10:51 |
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| f4 | one more question, my mate is creating many small branches instead of going on with the same one for a task, but he claims he's keeping the same. in fact he uses bzr pull to get last trunk revision before he works | 11:15 |
| f4 | is that the reason? he should be merging trunk into the feature branch right? | 11:15 |
| LarstiQ | f4: the situation isn't clear to me | 11:20 |
| f4 | well it looks like this http://bluebox.selfip.com/vrac/bazaar_bad.png while it should look more like this http://bluebox.selfip.com/vrac/bazaar_good.png (sry for bad quality "image hack" ^^) | 11:28 |
| LarstiQ | f4: neither is particularly wrong | 11:29 |
| LarstiQ | f4: in general, there is no right or wrong approach, you can use the workflow you want | 11:29 |
| f4 | the branch i linked ont the second picture are related to the same task | 11:29 |
| LarstiQ | f4: however, there seems to be a difference of opinion on what workflow you two want to use | 11:29 |
| f4 | tash which has a blueprint | 11:29 |
| f4 | only the first one is actually linked to the blueprint (the red one) | 11:30 |
| f4 | no we agreed on that, in his head he was doing the second picture :) | 11:31 |
| f4 | so the "problem" is that he's doing pull instead of merging the trunk in his branch i suppose | 11:32 |
| LarstiQ | I still don't see what the problem is | 11:39 |
| f4 | the problem is there is 3 branches while he though he was working on the same one | 11:48 |
| f4 | he though he was doing the same as the branch going from rev 25 to 28 | 11:51 |
| Hobbsee | thankyou, launchpad users mailing list, for the spam. | 12:41 |
| * Hobbsee thought the DC ran a spam filter | 12:41 | |
| beuno | Hobbsee, you mean the autoreply? ;) | 12:42 |
| Hobbsee | beuno: by subject only, it appears. the content doesn't look to be an autoreply ;) | 12:45 |
| Hobbsee | apart from the fact that it's very late, it looks rather non-autoreply-ish | 12:45 |
| beuno | ay | 12:49 |
| beuno | more noise | 12:49 |
| beuno | barry, did anything change in the ML settings for lp-users? | 12:50 |
| Hobbsee | ...and there goes the second one | 12:50 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| Hobbsee | ...and the third. | 12:52 |
| * Hobbsee wonders hwy they're sending to lists.canonical.com | 12:52 | |
| barry | beuno: yes, elmo fixed the forwarding yesterday so now it's working the way it was supposed to :) | 12:54 |
| beuno | barry, why weren't we getting these annoying emails before? | 12:55 |
| beuno | where some users blocked and not migrated over? | 12:55 |
| barry | what annoying emails? | 12:55 |
| beuno | vacation and away replies | 12:55 |
| Hobbsee | which are actually trying to sell things | 12:56 |
| barry | beuno: can you check the list copies and be sure they have a Precedence: list header? | 12:56 |
| barry | are you seeing them only when you try to send a message to the list? i didn't see any on my test yesterday | 12:57 |
| beuno | barry, Precedence: list | 12:57 |
| beuno | the one from: consultoriatelecon@hotmail.com | 12:57 |
| beuno | to: launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com | 12:58 |
| barry | okay, so our lists are doing the right thing, but those vacation responders are broken | 12:58 |
| beuno | possibly, but I wonder why *now* | 12:58 |
| beuno | maybe because those users are now subscribed and they weren't before? | 12:58 |
| barry | if on the old list the email address was linked to a lp user, we subscribed that address to the new list | 12:59 |
| barry | but there were lots of new subscribers to just the new team/list | 13:00 |
| barry | so it's very possible you're getting the bounces from them | 13:00 |
| superm1 | Hi guys, i can't seem to figure out how to delete a team from LP. Is the UI missing for it, or am I just missing it? | 13:01 |
| beuno | barry, cool. So now we start blocking users? :) | 13:01 |
| al-maisan | superm1: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/47 | 13:02 |
| superm1 | al-maisan, that's for closing accounts though, is it valid for teams too? | 13:03 |
| al-maisan | superm1: I think so. | 13:03 |
| superm1 | al-maisan, no in the change details section of the team, there is nothing on deactivating it | 13:04 |
| barry | beuno: on python.org we get medieval on people with broken replybots :) | 13:04 |
| al-maisan | superm1: OK .. let me find out more. | 13:05 |
| superm1 | i should clarify; i dont want to just remove myself from the team. i want to remove the team from existing | 13:05 |
| superm1 | i'm the team administrator | 13:05 |
| beuno | barry, that's the spirit! | 13:05 |
| al-maisan | superm1: that's understood. | 13:06 |
| superm1 | i've gone through and removed all members of the team (including myself) and all team memberships and still nothing is presented anywhere in the UI that I can find for removing the team: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mythbuntu-trunk | 13:14 |
| sinzui | superm1: make a request (ask a question) to at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad. An Admin can deactivate the team | 13:15 |
| superm1 | sinzui, ah great thanks. | 13:15 |
| sinzui | superm1: The process of deactivate is an admin privilege because the changes a lot of users, bugs, etc... | 13:16 |
| superm1 | sinzui, even for teams though? I would think that teams wouldn't be commenting on bugs, and at least an empty team wouldn't require changing any users | 13:17 |
| sinzui | superm1: They can be subscribed to bugs, blueprints, answers. They have translations powers too | 13:17 |
| superm1 | ah. all things i never used the team for i suppose | 13:18 |
| balor | Is there any way to create a new project in lp so that I can upload my local bzr repo? i.e. I don't want to import (because the bzr repo is not on a public server) | 13:47 |
| superm1 | yeah shouldn't you be able to make a project and just bzr push? | 13:48 |
| balor | superm1: What's the link to make a project? I can only find to register a branch | 13:49 |
| superm1 | balor, https://launchpad.net/projects/+new-guided | 13:50 |
| balor | thanks | 13:50 |
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| Shred00 | somebody advised I come ask here: can we have the production of -dbg packages enabled for PPA builds? it helps greatly with reporting crashes if stack traces have symbols. | 14:13 |
| al-maisan | Shred00: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/285205 | 14:21 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 285205 in soyuz "Soyuz needs to be able to process and publish ddebs" [Medium,Triaged] | 14:21 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| adiroiban | hi guys. do you know where I could find the Launchpad OpenID plugin for moinmoin ? the same one used on help.ubuntu.com/community ? | 15:01 |
| andrea-bs | adiroiban: help.ubuntu.com uses the default MoinMoin plugin for OpenID support | 15:02 |
| fjlacoste | andrea-bs: not sure of that | 15:05 |
| andrea-bs | fjlacoste: I have the same in my MoinMoin instance | 15:05 |
| adiroiban | it's moinmoin 1.7 ? | 15:05 |
| fjlacoste | adiroiban: the default OpenID plugin should work, but if you want Launcphpad team support, that extension hasn't been pushed upstream yet | 15:05 |
| adiroiban | i thought it's 1.6 | 15:05 |
| fjlacoste | andrea-bs: the default extension lacks team integration | 15:05 |
| === fjlacoste is now known as flacoste | ||
| adiroiban | can I get the LP plugin from downstream ? | 15:06 |
| andrea-bs | flacoste: is there a team integration for MoinMoin? | 15:06 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| flacoste | andrea-bs: yes | 15:09 |
| flacoste | andrea-bs: you can use launchpad team in ACL | 15:09 |
| flacoste | but this hasn't been released yet | 15:09 |
| andrea-bs | flacoste: cool, could you tell me when will it be released? I can't find anything on dev.launchpad.net :( | 15:11 |
| flacoste | andrea-bs: don't know yet, i'll take to the people doing it, last month we released the Dupal extensions, the Moin ones should follow soon | 15:11 |
| andrea-bs | thanks, flacoste | 15:12 |
| adiroiban | flacoste, can we have the unrelease code ? I would like to integrate it into our loco wiki page | 15:13 |
| flacoste | adiroiban: can you file a question on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion about this? | 15:14 |
| adiroiban | sure | 15:14 |
| adiroiban | i'd do this right away | 15:14 |
| flacoste | adiroiban: that way we could track it there, i'll ask the guys who are in charge of that process to comment on it | 15:14 |
| adiroiban | ok. No problem. I was thinking the code is somewhere in a bzr branch and it's just me who can not find it | 15:15 |
| coolbhavi | hello | 15:16 |
| coolbhavi | Please see : https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/314308 | 15:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 314308 in linux "USB 2.0 too slow " [Undecided,Incomplete] | 15:16 |
| coolbhavi | bug was not reported properly so I changed the package and description and asked for more info | 15:17 |
| al-maisan | coolbhavi: yes, ..? | 15:18 |
| coolbhavi | but rude and arrogant answers | 15:18 |
| coolbhavi | esp : https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/314308/comments/4 | 15:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 314308 in linux "USB 2.0 too slow " [Undecided,Incomplete] | 15:19 |
| al-maisan | coolbhavi: I see .. somebody will look into this. | 15:19 |
| coolbhavi | look at the whole comment by expanding the links | 15:19 |
| coolbhavi | please | 15:19 |
| al-maisan | coolbhavi: please explain what you find so offensive about that comment .. I believe the user was using that quote as a signature and it was not specifically targeting you. | 15:27 |
| al-maisan | I understand that it may have hurt your feelings but that comment does not appear to be outright and intentionally offensive. | 15:28 |
| coolbhavi | al-maisan, I know him pretty well | 15:35 |
| al-maisan | personally? | 15:35 |
| coolbhavi | al-maisan, yup, his signature is only his name | 15:36 |
| al-maisan | hmm.. | 15:36 |
| * al-maisan looks at that comment again | 15:36 | |
| CarlFK | can I see the code that builds PPA binaries ? | 15:37 |
| al-maisan | CarlFK: what do you mean? | 15:37 |
| al-maisan | the build system? | 15:37 |
| CarlFK | what I get from my PPA is not what I get when I apt-get source and build it local | 15:37 |
| al-maisan | hmm .. what are the differences? | 15:37 |
| CarlFK | the patch isn't applied | 15:38 |
| coolbhavi | al-maisan, okay leave it he is a beginner and I ve marked it incomplete :) | 15:38 |
| CarlFK | https://edge.launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive Intrepid is the only one I have tested | 15:38 |
| al-maisan | coolbhavi: thank you very much .. I believe this is the best course of action .. give him the benefit of doubt | 15:38 |
| coolbhavi | al-maisan, :) | 15:39 |
| al-maisan | :) | 15:39 |
| CarlFK | I think it has something to do with odd build requirements: "apt-get build-dep python-poppler" errored: unmet dependencies, but aptitude build-dep python-poppler installed what was needed | 15:40 |
| al-maisan | CarlFK: did you apt-get source from the PPA? | 15:40 |
| CarlFK | al-maisan: yes | 15:40 |
| al-maisan | hmm .. that's a bit odd. | 15:40 |
| CarlFK | the upstream version has no patches. I have 1 patch that adds 2 chars. so pretty easy to track | 15:40 |
| maxb | CarlFK: Your package has an odd version number. How can it be based on 0.8.1-2 when unstable and jaunty only have 0.8.1-1 ? | 15:43 |
| CarlFK | maxb: " increase the Ubuntu version number and add a suffix of ~ppan " https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Versioning | 15:45 |
| maxb | hrm | 15:45 |
| maxb | Should probably have been 0.8.1-1ubuntu0~ppa1 in this case | 15:46 |
| al-maisan | CarlFK: my guess is that it's related to the unmet "build-dep python-poppler" dependencies | 15:46 |
| CarlFK | al-maisan: cept then it should have errored, not build a binary | 15:47 |
| maxb | Also, ideally your package would be in .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz form - but it has accidentally ended up transformed into single-tarball form | 15:47 |
| al-maisan | CarlFK: please point me to your PPA | 15:47 |
| CarlFK | https://edge.launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive Intrepid is the only one I have tested | 15:47 |
| al-maisan | CarlFK: so, what were the unmet dependencies that apt-get build-dep complained about? | 15:51 |
| CarlFK | al-maisan: give me a sec - I think I have a fresh ibex box.. | 15:51 |
| al-maisan | OK | 15:51 |
| maxb | CarlFK: It is an error to include a hyphen within the release portion of the version number. That is why your packaging has gone into single-tarball style | 15:52 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| maxb | CarlFK: Your patch is not being applied because you have improperly integrated quilt into debian/rules | 15:55 |
| * mpt is getting confused by duplicate bug report messages | 15:55 | |
| CarlFK | maxb: that wouldn't surprise me. | 15:56 |
| CarlFK | al-maisan: my ibex install was waiting for me to confirm disk partitioning... so that's gonna be a few min (u-server, so maybe 10 min) | 15:56 |
| al-maisan | CarlFK: fair enough .. but I believe maxb found the root cause of your problem anyway | 15:57 |
| CarlFK | maxb: shouldn't the PPA build process have aborted? | 15:57 |
| maxb | No, because your rules file was genuinely configured to not apply the patch! :-) | 15:59 |
| CarlFK | doh | 15:59 |
| CarlFK | so whad I do wrong? | 16:00 |
| maxb | CarlFK: configure should stay depending on configure-stamp. configure-stamp should get an extra dependency on $(QUILT_STAMPFN) | 16:01 |
| CarlFK | I remember wondering about that | 16:02 |
| CarlFK | thanks | 16:02 |
| mpt | al-maisan, seen <https://launchpad.net/cs-112---assignment-6>? :-) | 16:10 |
| * al-maisan looks | 16:10 | |
| bigjools | ha - does someone want his homework done for him? | 16:11 |
| mpt | bigjools, I see the top contributor is someone else :-) | 16:11 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| al-maisan | strange project indeed :) | 16:12 |
| al-maisan | This person "david" seems to be an aspiring "project manager" :) | 16:13 |
| === discoflux is now known as afflux | ||
| Kmos | ftp.launchpad.net is down ? | 16:16 |
| Kmos | can't upload to PPA | 16:16 |
| al-maisan | Kmos: any error messages? | 16:17 |
| Kmos | ppa.launchpad.net i mean (connection refued) | 16:17 |
| Kmos | refused | 16:17 |
| Kmos | it worked yesterday :) | 16:17 |
| al-maisan | please show me your dput conf file | 16:18 |
| bigjools | al-maisan: I can't get to it either | 16:18 |
| al-maisan | ah | 16:18 |
| bigjools | poppy is probably down | 16:18 |
| bigjools | cprov: ^ | 16:19 |
| al-maisan | Kmos: what bigjools said. | 16:19 |
| Kmos | al-maisan: http://paste.ubuntu.com/101125/ | 16:19 |
| Kmos | ah :) | 16:19 |
| al-maisan | thanks :) | 16:19 |
| Kmos | np | 16:19 |
| coolbhavi | Check your network (111, 'Connection refused') while trying to upload to PPA | 16:25 |
| al-maisan | coolbhavi: thanks for the hint .. we are already looking at it. | 16:26 |
| coolbhavi | al-maisan, :) | 16:27 |
| ahasenack | hey guys, quick question: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client/+bug/306360 is not listed at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client even though one task is not yet resolved. How can I change that? | 16:31 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 306360 in landscape-client "Update landscape-client package to 1.0.25" [Undecided,In progress] | 16:31 |
| beuno | ahasenack, I think that's a bug in Launchpad | 16:34 |
| beuno | BjornT, gmb? | 16:34 |
| RainCT | Hi | 16:35 |
| RainCT | I'm getting "Connection failed, aborting. Check your network (111, 'Connection refused')" trying to dput to a private PPA. Some days ago I had no problem with this. Any idea on what may be the problem? | 16:35 |
| gmb | beuno: Looking... | 16:36 |
| beuno | you *can* see it if you look at "All bugs ever reported" | 16:36 |
| bigjools | RainCT: we're on it | 16:36 |
| RainCT | bigjools: so it's not only me? | 16:36 |
| coolbhavi | RainCT, +1 | 16:37 |
| bigjools | RainCT: unfortunately correct | 16:37 |
| RainCT | OK, thanks | 16:37 |
| ahasenack | beuno: but that includes the closed ones? | 16:37 |
| gmb | ahasenack: The task that would appear at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client has been resolved - it's Fix Released. | 16:38 |
| gmb | ahasenack: I think that that page only shows... | 16:38 |
| ahasenack | gmb: so I need to change the task that is tracked to the other one? | 16:38 |
| CarlFK | ~$ ftp ppa.launchpad.net | 16:38 |
| CarlFK | ftp: connect: Connection refused | 16:38 |
| gmb | ahasenack: Ah hang on, I might be talking out of my hat. | 16:38 |
| CarlFK | is that me, or does it go off line now and then? | 16:39 |
| coolbhavi | CarlFK, +1 seems ftp is down | 16:39 |
| === bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: PPA uploading is broken, we're looking at it || https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: al-maisan | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
| === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | ||
| CarlFK | coolbhavi: thanks. | 16:39 |
| ahasenack | gmb: my confusion is that there doesn't seem to be a simple way to list all open bugs against a package. That was my intention with the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client URL | 16:39 |
| gmb | ahasenack: Right... Ah, I see the problem now. | 16:40 |
| gmb | ahasenack: So, this is sort of a bug, sort of not. | 16:41 |
| alefteris | Hi all. Is there a way to search all launchpad ppa with a package name? | 16:41 |
| gmb | ahasenack: The problem is that because the bug has been targetted to a series (Jaunty and Intrepid in this case) the original task is no longer considered a task (that's why it says "status tracked in... blah"). | 16:41 |
| bigjools | alefteris: not right now, no | 16:41 |
| gmb | ahasenack: So when you look at just the package page it will show you only the ones assigned to the package, not the ones targetted to a particualr series (well, it might show the ones for Jaunty because it's the current series; I haven't established that for sure yet). | 16:42 |
| ahasenack | gmb: so, how do I change where the status is tracked? | 16:43 |
| gmb | ahasenack: Well, I was right; the Jaunty tasks will show up at +source/landscape-client (because it's the current series). (see https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client for an example) | 16:46 |
| gmb | ahasenack: As for changing where it's tracked, I'm not sure you can. | 16:46 |
| gmb | Since Jaunty is the current series for Ubuntu, so that's where the changes are tracked for the Ubuntu package. | 16:47 |
| gmb | Which, yes, is a bug. | 16:47 |
| ahasenack | gmb: yeah, because that means I'm better off opening another ticket for intrepid instead of another task at that ticket | 16:47 |
| ahasenack | gmb: because or else the ticket just "disappears" from the bug listing as was this case | 16:47 |
| gmb | ahasenack: For tracking purposes, yes, which sucks massively. | 16:48 |
| gmb | Absolutely blows. | 16:48 |
| ahasenack | gmb: ok, is there a bug open for it? If not, should I open one? | 16:48 |
| ahasenack | gmb: I'm not even sure how to search for this in launchpad to see if there is a bug already open or not :) | 16:48 |
| gmb | ahasenack: I'll file a bug about this (or find if there is one; *someone* must have seen this before) | 16:48 |
| ahasenack | gmb: cool, many thanks! | 16:49 |
| gmb | ahasenack: Sorry it had to bite you. | 16:49 |
| ahasenack | gmb: now that I'm aware of how it works, it's ok for the time being | 16:49 |
| ahasenack | gmb: thanks for the help | 16:49 |
| gmb | np | 16:49 |
| soc | does someone know how long it will take to restore uploading? | 16:49 |
| bigjools | not yet | 16:50 |
| al-maisan | alefteris: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/203 | 16:51 |
| bigjools | something filled up the disk, the admins are investigating | 16:51 |
| alefteris | al-maisan, thanks :) | 16:54 |
| alefteris | al-maisan, the results listing is not very usufull though, it would be nice if the packages where listed | 16:55 |
| bigjools | alefteris: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/280958 | 16:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 280958 in soyuz "Package page doesn't show PPAs for that package" [Undecided,Triaged] | 16:57 |
| maxb | ooi, does anyone know how far off signed PPAs are? Just roughly days/weeks/months? | 16:58 |
| beuno | cprov, ^ | 16:58 |
| bigjools | maxb: days | 16:58 |
| superm1 | Hi guys, for the purposes of an automated package builder, how long does the publisher take to publish a .orig.tar.gz on a PPA? We're doing builds for hardy and intrepid, but only want to upload orig.tar.gz once, so the first upload will have orig.tar.gz, and second wouldn't | 16:58 |
| bigjools | superm1: up to 20 minutes | 16:59 |
| superm1 | bigjools, okay so sleeping for say 25 minutes should be a safe estimate then | 16:59 |
| bigjools | superm1: as long as it is accepted, yeah | 16:59 |
| superm1 | there's no cirumstances that it will be larger right? | 16:59 |
| bigjools | superm1: can you wait for the acceptance mail or is that not an option? | 17:00 |
| superm1 | bigjools, well it would be a bit difficult to do so the way the job is cronned, so a static time would be a lot better | 17:00 |
| bigjools | if it's not, add your voice to bug 305331 :) | 17:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 305331 in soyuz "XMPP Messages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/305331 | 17:00 |
| alefteris | bigjools, this is not related to my complain.. what i said is that the result listing of the ppa search doesn't list by package name, but by uploader | 17:00 |
| bigjools | alefteris: ah I see | 17:01 |
| bigjools | superm1: we process them every 20 minutes, so give it 30 in case there's unforseen delays and you should be ok | 17:01 |
| superm1 | bigjools, okay great. and yes that bug would be awesome. i'll add a comment | 17:01 |
| cprov | superm1: for the record, reusing the orig in a subsequent upload is immediately possible for all source uploads. It doesn't require the source to be published on disk. | 17:04 |
| bigjools | of course, good point | 17:04 |
| cprov | superm1: it won't be possible only if the source get stuck on queue (for ubuntu uploads) | 17:04 |
| superm1 | cprov, oh so, there wouldn't be a rejection for a .diff.gz/dsc only on the second upload if it was immediately after? | 17:05 |
| cprov | superm1: no, assuming the previous upload was accepted. | 17:06 |
| superm1 | cprov, ah wonderful, then we'll just nuke the sleep between uploads. thanks! | 17:06 |
| cprov | superm1: right, dput will block and upload processing is serialized. It should work, let us know if it doesn't. | 17:07 |
| superm1 | cprov, okay thanks | 17:07 |
| cprov | superm1: you are welcome. | 17:08 |
| ahasenack | gmb: once you have the bug number (either by finding an already filed bug, or filing a new one), could you let me know? I would like to subscribe to it | 17:11 |
| gmb | ahasenack: I've filed it as bug 314432 | 17:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 314432 in malone "It's impossible to see all the bugs that affect a package if some bugs are targeted to one or more series and the Master task is closed" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/314432 | 17:11 |
| ahasenack | gmb: cool, thanks | 17:12 |
| === al-maisan changed the topic of #launchpad to: PPA uploading is broken, we're looking at it || https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: - | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
| cprov | al-maisan: it's already fixed. | 17:12 |
| cprov | nevermind | 17:13 |
| === cprov changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: - | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
| superm1 | Daviey, ask cprov^ | 17:15 |
| Daviey | cprov: when was it fixed? | 17:15 |
| Daviey | cprov: About an hour ago, i could only get it working using passive ftp | 17:15 |
| Daviey | Is that related? | 17:16 |
| cprov | Daviey: fixed 5 minutes ago, I'm not sure if the passive-ftp issue was related. | 17:16 |
| cprov | Daviey: probably not. | 17:17 |
| Daviey | meh, i was getting conenction refused - oh well i've changed my settings to passive and it seems to be working. | 17:17 |
| cprov | Daviey: check w/o it, it should work as well. | 17:21 |
| Daviey | cprov: will do, when i next push in 20 mins | 17:21 |
| cprov | Daviey: great, thanks. | 17:22 |
| Daviey | cprov: yep, non passive worked fine then - i guess it was related. | 17:28 |
| Daviey | (active) | 17:28 |
| cprov | Daviey: probably. Anyway, all fixed now. | 17:28 |
| Daviey | woot | 17:29 |
| === bac is now known as bac_lunch | ||
| CarlFK | um... looking at my build logs: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! | 18:07 |
| CarlFK | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20955285/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.python-poppler_0.8.1-2~ppa3~intrepid1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 18:07 |
| LaserJock | can somebody give me details on who's allowed to see private bugs? | 18:12 |
| beuno | LaserJock, whoever has permissions on the project, or is subscribed to the bug | 18:12 |
| LaserJock | beuno: would that include bug supervisors? | 18:12 |
| LaserJock | or do you need to be explicitly subscribed | 18:12 |
| beuno | LaserJock, I'd expect the bug supervisor to see them, but I don't know for sure | 18:13 |
| beuno | permissions is a blurry area for me :) | 18:13 |
| LaserJock | *cough* that's why you make lists *cough* | 18:14 |
| beuno | right, one of the plans is to have all permissions in one page, and you can configure them from there | 18:14 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === bac_lunch is now known as bac | ||
| CarlFK | so if my ppa build fails, I can't apt-get source it? | 18:24 |
| bigon | hi, is there any plan to add rmadison support to ppa? | 18:25 |
| james_w | bigon: it appears you could script it with the api | 18:32 |
| bdmurray | Is the assigner of a bug task tracked anywhere other than the the activity log / table? | 18:33 |
| james_w | for source package at least | 18:33 |
| james_w | bdmurray: assignee, or the person that created the task? | 18:33 |
| bdmurray | james_w: the person that assigned the bug task to an assignee | 18:34 |
| CarlFK | maxb: can you help me out - brain is getting overloaded, and I have 20 min before a meeting... really like to get this fixed before then. rules/results: http://dpaste.com/106056/ | 18:35 |
| CarlFK | perhaps cookies and coffe for lunch was not part of a well balanced breakfast... | 18:36 |
| gsuveg | re | 18:41 |
| LaserJock | beuno: a bug supervisor doesn't seem to be sufficient | 18:50 |
| LaserJock | that's a tad problematic :( | 18:50 |
| bigon | I'm trying to use python-launchpadlib (example https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib) and I get a time out when connection to the stagin service | 19:01 |
| james_w | bigon: I've got a quick ppamadison here if you like | 19:18 |
| bigon | james_w: oh it would be nice | 19:19 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| Pres-Gas | Okay, I have an Inspiron Mini 9 that is completely freezing when trying to join up with a wpa 2 enterprise g network. I am getting no usable logs it freezes so hard. Whare should I start in reporting this kind of bug? | 19:29 |
| rockstar | Pres-Gas, I think #ubuntu-bugs could probably help you more. | 19:30 |
| Pres-Gas | I am not sure to ping wpa-suplicant, or NM, or the kernel | 19:30 |
| Pres-Gas | Okay | 19:30 |
| Pres-Gas | The problem was how to start reporting it, you know, rockstar? | 19:30 |
| Pres-Gas | If I get usable logs, that would help | 19:31 |
| Pres-Gas | :P | 19:31 |
| rockstar | Pres-Gas, yeah, I understand. #launchpad is more for specific issues with Launchpad though. | 19:31 |
| rockstar | It's a common mistake though. We should fix that. | 19:31 |
| Pres-Gas | Excellent, and I thought so...I have been on launchpad for a bit...but forgot about the bugs channel | 19:31 |
| Pres-Gas | duh | 19:31 |
| === fabrice_sp__ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
| CarlFK | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~web2-conf/ there should be about 20+ items there | 19:43 |
| CarlFK | at least 5 open ones. whered they go? | 19:44 |
| CarlFK | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/web2conf/+bugs there they are | 19:45 |
| === bac is now known as bac_afk | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| maxb | CarlFK: Got it to work in the end? I was afk | 20:09 |
| CarlFK | maxb: i think so | 20:09 |
| CarlFK | in meeing... will get back to in in 30 min or so | 20:09 |
| iulian | Hiya. I'd like to remove a project created by me some time ago. I initially created it to maintain some scripts using Bazaar. The project is 'iulian' (https://edge.launchpad.net/iulian). I believe it is not worth to keep it if I don't use it anymore. | 20:11 |
| maxb | iulian: I believe you need to file a request in https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad for that to happen | 20:15 |
| iulian | maxb: Ah-ha, thanks! | 20:17 |
| iulian | Will do that. | 20:17 |
| iulian | Cheerio. | 20:17 |
| bigon | james_w: do you have already put the code somewhere? | 20:56 |
| james_w | bigon: I didn't | 20:56 |
| james_w | I wanted to see if it was going in to u-d-t, or whether I should write my own credentials handling routine | 20:57 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| Jaearess | Is there an open source system similar to Launchpad available? One that can be hosted by a company internally and that brings together all the pieces that Launchpad.net does? | 22:25 |
| maxb | ooi, why does launchpad do everything over https ? | 23:26 |
| beuno | maxb, yes | 23:28 |
| beuno | except code browse (aka loggerhead) | 23:28 |
| jml | maxb: there are plans to allow http access, iirc. | 23:30 |
| jml | there certainly *were* plans. | 23:31 |
| maxb | It's not a problem for me, I'm just curious why it does it | 23:31 |
| jml | maxb: aiui, it's because a) we need https for secure authentication, b) it makes information on LP reliable as information *from* LP (which can be important for things like security bugs), c) mixing plain http and https takes a fair bit of dev work, so all https is easier. | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
