| asac | fta: thats a new patch | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | we still have the review+ one | 00:03 |
| asac | sunil is the spicebird guy iirc | 00:03 |
| asac | fta: do you log every channel you join? | 00:06 |
| fta | yes | 00:06 |
| asac | fta: do you have the workshop logs? | 00:06 |
| asac | at UDS? | 00:06 |
| asac | hmm ... maybe that was here? | 00:06 |
| asac | when was that? | 00:06 |
| fta | it was here | 00:06 |
| asac | 11th dec? | 00:07 |
| asac | or 12th? | 00:07 |
| fta | 11&12 dec | 00:07 |
| asac | hmm | 00:11 |
| asac | :) | 00:11 |
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/100681/ | 00:40 |
| asac | GRE_VERSION=@XULVER@ | 00:43 |
| asac | what woud that be? | 00:44 |
| fta | 1.9.1b3pre | 00:44 |
| asac | 's/\+nobin.*//' ? | 00:44 |
| fta | no need, already covered | 00:45 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ echo 1.9.1~b3~hg20090103r22626+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta2 | sed -e 's/\+.*//' -e 's/~\([^~]*\).*/\1pre/' | 00:45 |
| fta | 1.9.1b3pre | 00:45 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ echo 1.9.0.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | sed -e 's/\+.*//' -e 's/~\([^~]*\).*/\1pre/' | 00:45 |
| fta | 1.9.0.5 | 00:45 |
| asac | if i have to do 1.9.1+1+nobinonly? | 00:45 |
| fta | oh | 00:45 |
| asac | not sure if its an issue ;) ... or if we want what is before first + anyway | 00:46 |
| asac | but at least we should think a minute ;) | 00:46 |
| fta | it's fine, we want 1.9.1, not 1.9.1+1 | 00:46 |
| asac | yes ... and main use case for +1 would be later fixup of tarball ... in which case upstreawm version still is 1.9.1 | 00:47 |
| asac | fta: why not just do this on upgrade | 00:48 |
| asac | nm | 00:48 |
| asac | on upgrade can we see files of old package or not? | 00:48 |
| fta | yes | 00:49 |
| asac | then just do that on upgrade | 00:50 |
| asac | and dig the accurate gre version from the "old" files | 00:50 |
| asac | fta: hmm ... actually this all reminds me that we should consider to add a new location in /usr/share/gre.d or something | 00:54 |
| asac | maybe such a location exists? | 00:54 |
| fta | what for? | 00:54 |
| asac | for the "in package" shipped conf files | 00:55 |
| asac | /etc is ment for admins ... not for packages | 00:55 |
| asac | as we can see with all the troubles we have | 00:56 |
| asac | so in perfect world, xul would look at ~/.gre.d/ /etc/gre.d/ /usr/share/gre.d/ | 00:56 |
| asac | in that order | 00:56 |
| asac | ah of course the env MOZ_GRE=/... is first | 00:56 |
| fta | /etc/gre.d/ is not our choice in the 1st place, it comes from upstream | 00:58 |
| fta | but you're right, it's ugly | 00:58 |
| asac | yes i know ... thats why we need an upstream patch | 00:59 |
| fta | but issues with /etc management are only debian based. we'll have to convince benjamin that it's wanted for everyone | 01:00 |
| fta | i can smell the r- from here :P | 01:01 |
| asac | GRE_HOME | 01:01 |
| asac | is first | 01:02 |
| asac | hmm | 01:02 |
| asac | MOZ_GRE_CONF | 01:03 |
| asac | seems to be on UNIX | 01:03 |
| asac | then ~/.gre.config | 01:03 |
| asac | then ~/.gre.d/*.conf | 01:03 |
| asac | /etc/gre.conf | 01:03 |
| asac | /etc/gre.d/ | 01:03 |
| fta | aren't the files only legacy? | 01:04 |
| asac | probably | 01:04 |
| asac | i dont suggest /usr/share/gre.conf ;) ... just gre.d | 01:04 |
| RainCT | Hi | 01:10 |
| asac | hi | 01:11 |
| RainCT | I'm uploading adblock-plus 1.0 to Jaunty right now. Would be good if someone could test it once it has built :) | 01:11 |
| asac | fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/100698/ ;) | 01:11 |
| asac | review- | 01:11 |
| asac | err, more like http://paste.ubuntu.com/100699/ | 01:12 |
| asac | still - | 01:12 |
| asac | fta: what does redhat/suse do about /etc stuff? | 01:12 |
| asac | just wipe everything on upgrade? | 01:12 |
| asac | RainCT: i guess a bunch of people use it :) | 01:15 |
| asac | i think i use it too | 01:15 |
| asac | so will just take bit ;) | 01:15 |
| fta | asac, no idea | 01:18 |
| crimsun | fta: (sorry to cut in; themuso and i are working on getting nightlies built of pulseaudio, alsa-lib, and alsa-plugins so it'll be easier to test for regressions) | 01:19 |
| fta | nice | 01:22 |
| RainCT | well, I'm off now. Good night! | 01:24 |
| fta | me too, not enough sleep last night | 01:25 |
| === rzr is now known as rZr | ||
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/100931/ | 09:32 |
| fta | obviously, it should be simpler | 09:36 |
| asac | fta: how about shipping the test_harness? | 09:47 |
| asac | e.g. the test_all.sh | 09:47 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | fta: Bug 312353 seems fixed according to bug | 10:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 312353 in xorg-server "improper mouse hover behavior with links" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/312353 | 10:18 |
| white | asac: pop/imap ssl, pop, smtp, smtp/ssl, dragging messages within imap and into it, encryption/decryption/signing with enigmail works | 10:20 |
| white | preference tabs look ok to me | 10:20 |
| white | now i just need to find the config switch to change the language :) | 10:21 |
| asac | white: install a langpack and export LANG=you_LANG | 10:29 |
| asac | then start | 10:29 |
| white | asac: one minor thing | 10:29 |
| white | asac: when i install all packages (except -dev and -dbg) i got a bit of an ugly gui part | 10:29 |
| white | in one of the preference tabs | 10:29 |
| white | but it doesn't exist, if i only have icedove installed | 10:29 |
| white | asac: language pack works, tested with German | 10:32 |
| asac | good | 10:35 |
| asac | open all preference tabs and so on | 10:35 |
| asac | if thats good, you are ready to go i guess | 10:35 |
| fta2 | <asac> fta: how about shipping the test_harness? <= hm, i think i do ship test_harness | 10:35 |
| white | asac: so far so good, i'll do my debdiffing now over the binary packages | 10:35 |
| white | asac: do you want to have a last look over the advisory? | 10:35 |
| asac | white: no. looked good yesterday | 10:36 |
| white | ok :) | 10:36 |
| white | i'll do last checks and then upload, it will take a few days to get all archs i guess :/ | 10:36 |
| white | asac: uploaded | 10:50 |
| asac | white: iceape also there now | 11:08 |
| asac | (uploaded) | 11:08 |
| white | asac: FTBFS on s390 :/ | 11:08 |
| white | asac: http://paste.debian.net/25356/ | 11:10 |
| white | asac: also i think we still should get a CVE id for mfsa2008-59, what do you think? | 11:16 |
| asac | white: s390 is known to be broken | 11:17 |
| asac | white: the porters replaced the machine that was initially used for etch with something new | 11:17 |
| asac | since then some s390 guy does binary uploads for security | 11:17 |
| asac | read the team@ archive or ask jmm what to do | 11:18 |
| white | ok | 11:18 |
| asac | (background: etch was released with s390 ... now security builder is s390x arch) | 11:18 |
| white | bah | 11:18 |
| white | ah got the thread on team@, thanks | 11:19 |
| asac | yeah ... thats what i thought too | 11:19 |
| asac | especially since they thought "thats probably 100% compatible" and didnt even tell the security team | 11:19 |
| white | pfff | 11:19 |
| asac | until icedove and friends blew up ;) | 11:19 |
| white | asac: 12:16 < white> asac: also i think we still should get a CVE id for mfsa2008-59, what do you think? | 11:20 |
| white | :) | 11:20 |
| asac | let me check my data again | 11:20 |
| white | asac: re s390: wow, i mean wooooooow. I didn't read it carefully enough back then, but now i am somehow shocked | 11:23 |
| asac | white: ok i asked | 11:24 |
| asac | (on advisory) | 11:24 |
| asac | on sec list it was confirmed twice that -59 is the CVE ... asked if -47 is the same now | 11:24 |
| asac | probably get back an answer in a few hours | 11:24 |
| asac | white: yeah. s390 is a mess | 11:25 |
| asac | we should not allow archs for which the builders are not under physical control most likely | 11:25 |
| asac | at least not official | 11:25 |
| white | ack | 11:27 |
| white | asac: yeah, in my notes I had MFSA 2008-59 and MFSA 2008-47 as the same issue, for both CVE-2008-4582 is valid | 11:30 |
| white | asac: although the description of CVE-2008-4582 is missleading as it reads like only windows is affected | 11:30 |
| asac | yeah | 11:31 |
| asac | lets see | 11:31 |
| asac | the redhat advisory guy is super responsive | 11:31 |
| white | who is it? | 11:31 |
| [reed] | B-something another? | 11:31 |
| [reed] | something like Brussels, but that's not it | 11:32 |
| [reed] | can't remember his name | 11:32 |
| [reed] | Josh Bressers | 11:32 |
| [reed] | that's it | 11:32 |
| white | ah yeah, he's great :) | 11:32 |
| asac | Josh Bressers | 11:33 |
| asac | yeah ;) | 11:33 |
| asac | great guy | 11:33 |
| asac | never sticks his head in the grounds ;) | 11:33 |
| [reed] | go him :) | 11:33 |
| [reed] | hmm, I was going to do something | 11:34 |
| [reed] | I can't remember what | 11:34 |
| [reed] | hmm | 11:34 |
| asac | [reed]: wade through the wealth sg: bugs ;) | 11:34 |
| asac | (not through the backdoor ;)) | 11:34 |
| [reed] | hehe | 11:34 |
| [reed] | ah, now I remember | 11:36 |
| [reed] | I was going to land a patch | 11:36 |
| asac | delicious | 11:36 |
| [reed] | yeah, something I wrote | 11:37 |
| [reed] | modifying default bookmarks | 11:37 |
| [reed] | all boring | 11:37 |
| [reed] | but needed to be done :) | 11:37 |
| asac_the_bumber | bumb quick! | 11:52 |
| asac | asac_the_bumber: what piece? | 12:05 |
| white | asac: ok, it looks like I'll do the iceape DSA as well | 13:50 |
| asac | heh | 13:57 |
| asac | nice ;) | 13:57 |
| asac | thats how it is ... once someone new wants to help out, the old crew - burned out as it is - leaves the ship :) | 13:58 |
| white | asac: this will be a shared adventure in the future, i can assure you ;) | 13:58 |
| white | asac: but for this round, I'll do it :) | 13:59 |
| white | asac: i wouldn't want to exclude all the other sec members from ice* fun :) | 13:59 |
| asac | yeah ... try to be hard about it :) | 14:05 |
| asac | history shows that i burn out sec members rather quickly ;) | 14:06 |
| asac | white: has eric uploaded iceweasel yet? | 14:06 |
| asac | mozilla bug 394610 | 14:07 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 394610 in Password Manager "Content can corrupt stored passwords by injecting line breaks" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394610 | 14:08 |
| white | does it have a CVE id? | 14:08 |
| white | asac: don't think so, but i am thinking about icedove/iceape now first :) | 14:09 |
| asac | sure | 14:09 |
| asac | the bug above? | 14:09 |
| asac | yes ... but its fixed long time | 14:09 |
| asac | dolske: ;) can you rubber stamp 394610 please | 14:09 |
| asac | (1.8.0) | 14:09 |
| white | asac: any news regarding CVE-2008-4582 aka MFSA 2008-47/MFSA 2008-59 yet? | 14:11 |
| asac | white: i will let you know once we know ;) | 14:12 |
| asac | since CVE-2008-4582 was already marked fixed | 14:12 |
| asac | in -47 | 14:12 |
| asac | we can probably leave it out of this adivory (just anme the MFSA for now) | 14:12 |
| asac | or lets wait till builds have finished to decide | 14:12 |
| asac | i am quite sure i get an answer soon | 14:12 |
| white | ok | 14:14 |
| white | asac: now to the iceape advisory text :) | 14:14 |
| white | asac: i can probably just use the changelog as an indication, right? | 14:15 |
| asac | white: yes. the changelog is done with care | 14:16 |
| asac | so the CVEs/MFSAs are ok (except the one in question for -59 of course) | 14:17 |
| white | :) | 14:19 |
| asac | @time | 14:33 |
| ubottu | Current time in Etc/UTC: January 06 2009, 14:35:56 - Next meeting: Server Team in 1 hour 24 minutes | 14:33 |
| fta2 | Bug 310126 | 14:56 |
| ubottu | Bug 310126 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/310126 is private | 14:57 |
| asac | fta2: ok fennec now gets LICENSE file in upstream hg | 15:19 |
| white | asac: have to go offline now, will finish the iceape advisory tomorrow and get back to you about the DSAs | 16:58 |
| asac | sure. thanks! | 16:58 |
| Jazzva | asac: ping | 17:53 |
| Jazzva | a quick question about UIDs .. the chance that two extensions/programs get very similar UID are really low, right? | 17:54 |
| Jazzva | very similar == differ in one character | 17:54 |
| asac | well | 17:55 |
| asac | i think its many times more likely to get a collision if you remove one char | 17:55 |
| asac | the growth is somehow exponential i would say | 17:56 |
| asac | but thats just a guess ;) ... complexity theory is long ago | 17:56 |
| Jazzva | I'm asking because the guy that mailed us on the mailing list uses the ID that is very similar to FF's ID. So, I think that maybe he has the wrong FF ID in install.rdf, and that he is using it as the ID for his own extension in debian/rules. I'll just ask for a full paste of install.rdf. Thanks :) | 17:58 |
| asac | Jazzva: oh. well if thats the case it shoudlnt matter | 17:59 |
| asac | though people manually starting with ff id more likely end up with collision | 17:59 |
| asac | but well | 17:59 |
| asac | if he has a chance to change that tell him to use the new syntax | 17:59 |
| asac | product@project.tld | 17:59 |
| Jazzva | well, if he uses the wrong ID for FF, FF won't recognize the extension (that's at least my guess) | 17:59 |
| asac | this gives him a good namespace and will prevent him from getting collisions | 17:59 |
| Jazzva | thanks, I will... | 18:00 |
| asac | [reed]: so who is best for js/ build system related superreview? | 18:18 |
| [reed] | js doesn't require sr | 18:19 |
| [reed] | r is enough | 18:19 |
| asac | 471359 | 18:19 |
| [reed] | jim's not technically a peer... let me double-check that his review is sufficient | 18:20 |
| asac | [reed]: ted forwarded to him | 18:20 |
| asac | its a fall out from 467583 | 18:20 |
| [reed] | ah, then probably so | 18:20 |
| [reed] | I just asked crowder | 18:20 |
| asac | [reed]: why is brendan listed as js superreveiwer if js doesnt require it ;) ... http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/reviewers.html | 18:21 |
| [reed] | look under Exceptions | 18:21 |
| [reed] | "The JavaScript engine, like NSPR, is a closed CVS partition containing mature code, with dependencies only on another closed CVS partition (NSPR). Module owner review suffices to change JS code." | 18:21 |
| asac | interesting ... yeah. was tricked by the "js" in the superreviewers list | 18:21 |
| asac | [reed]: module owner review ... but ted isnt module owner i guess ;)? | 18:23 |
| [reed] | normal module-based review | 18:24 |
| [reed] | is what that means | 18:24 |
| [reed] | doesn't mean you have to get mo review | 18:25 |
| asac | ok ;) ... but it reads different | 18:26 |
| [reed] | yeah, I know | 18:26 |
| [reed] | asac: you're go for landing | 18:29 |
| [reed] | either land it yourself or add checkin-needed keyword | 18:29 |
| [reed] | make sure you follow proper tree rules when landing if you do it yourself | 18:29 |
| sebner | asac: do you know what's the name of the new of this new kompozer replacement things? | 18:32 |
| sebner | argh | 18:32 |
| sebner | weird sentence xD | 18:32 |
| asac | sebner: heh? | 18:32 |
| asac | i actually thought kompozer was the new one ;) | 18:32 |
| sebner | asac: nah, it's outdated (2007) | 18:32 |
| sebner | asac: fta found something new | 18:33 |
| sebner | but nothing stable yet | 18:33 |
| asac | i know its outdated ;) still i thought it was the "newer" one | 18:33 |
| sebner | asac: newer als nvu | 18:33 |
| asac | probably a resurrection as a xulapp | 18:33 |
| sebner | but there is something new in work | 18:33 |
| asac | newer or better than nvu? | 18:33 |
| sebner | asac: well, not stable yet but definately new | 18:33 |
| sebner | ^^ | 18:33 |
| sebner | besides .. nvu is 2005 | 18:34 |
| sebner | so everything is newer | 18:34 |
| sebner | ^^ | 18:34 |
| asac | probably not seamonkey-composer ;) | 18:34 |
| asac | technically newer, but didnt really get new features for ages | 18:35 |
| sebner | nope, AFAIK something else | 18:35 |
| sebner | fta will know when he is back | 18:35 |
| sebner | asac: might be http://www.bluegriffon.org/ | 18:37 |
| asac | maybe ;) | 18:38 |
| asac | i am happy if i dont need to touch any HTML ;) | 18:38 |
| asac | mozilla Bug 460548 | 18:40 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460548 in Build Config "Port |Bug 450983 - use leakThreshold for SeaMonkey testers| to Firefox" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460548 | 18:40 |
| sebner | lol | 18:40 |
| fta | sebner, yes, bluegriffon | 18:53 |
| sebner | \o/ | 18:53 |
| fta | i didn't touch that in a while | 18:57 |
| fta | last time i did, i posted 4 patches upstream, they rejected them as dupe because someone was already working on that | 18:58 |
| fta | ..for about a year | 18:59 |
| fta | yet, not a single patch was ever produced | 19:00 |
| fta | *sigh* | 19:00 |
| sebner | grrr | 19:03 |
| sebner | fta: but upstream is still active? | 19:03 |
| fta | i suppose so, yes | 19:04 |
| fta | i can update my package but now, they finally produce some code to replace mine, but i need to patch it again | 19:04 |
| fta | +d | 19:04 |
| asac | fta: thats a joy ;) ... but there is also good new ... at least we got a r+ on the libxul patch ;) | 19:05 |
| fta | asac, yep, told you yesterday ;) | 19:05 |
| asac | i mean 471359 ... that was today | 19:05 |
| asac | also 471474 seems to move after i proddec mfinkle | 19:06 |
| fta | mozilla bug 471359 | 19:06 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 471359 in Build Config "trunk build broken with "libxul.so: hidden symbol `deflate' isn't defined"" [Major,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471359 | 19:06 |
| fta | mozilla bug 471474 | 19:06 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 471474 in General "fennec/mobile-browser hg tree lacks LICENSE file in top-level directory" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471474 | 19:06 |
| fta | oh, ok. \o/ | 19:07 |
| fta | \ / | 19:07 |
| fta | \O/ | 19:07 |
| fta | | | 19:07 |
| asac | hehe | 19:07 |
| fta | / \ | 19:07 |
| asac | wow ... thats art ;) | 19:07 |
| fta | ah, you cut me in half | 19:07 |
| asac | but not that bad :) | 19:08 |
| asac | at least here on the screen | 19:08 |
| fta | outside of the build tree, all my tests complain with uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520006 (NS_ERROR_FILE_TARGET_DOES_NOT_EXIST) [nsIFile.normalize]" nsresult: "0x80520006 (NS_ERROR_FILE_TARGET_DOES_NOT_EXIST)" location: "JS frame :: ./_tests/xpcshell-simple/test_update/unit/head_update.js :: <TOP_LEVEL> :: line 320" data: no] | 19:12 |
| fta | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/test/unit/head_update.js#186 | 19:12 |
| fta | [pid 9663] lstat64("/usr/_tests", 0xbf9625dc) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) | 19:13 |
| fta | where does that /usr come from? | 19:14 |
| === Jazzva_ is now known as Jazzva | ||
| * asac_the_bumber waves | 19:15 | |
| asac_the_bumber | asac: bumb, testing new xul patch for the sigbus | 19:15 |
| * asac waves at armin | 19:15 | |
| asac | am i subscribed to the bug with the new patch? | 19:15 |
| asac | asac_the_bumber: also better track ffox 3.2 from central trunk ;) | 19:16 |
| asac_the_bumber | yeah but i haven't posted it yet | 19:16 |
| asac | good | 19:16 |
| asac | thought i missed a bugzilla mail again (which i would find bad) | 19:16 |
| asac_the_bumber | besides its not mine, its from other of the gentoo devs of the sparc team :) | 19:16 |
| wikz | fta: you once said that project.mk files can be included in the debain dir itself outside mozilla-descripts, does that have a build dependency on 0.12~fta2 or will 0.10 also support that? | 19:18 |
| fta | it's > 0.11 | 19:18 |
| fta | sorry | 19:18 |
| asac | wikz: where do you need it? | 19:19 |
| fta | so >= 0.12~fta1 | 19:19 |
| asac | fta: isnt that in intrepid? | 19:19 |
| fta | no | 19:19 |
| asac | k | 19:19 |
| fta | i need you to sponsor it | 19:19 |
| asac | for intrepid? | 19:19 |
| fta | it's in main | 19:20 |
| asac | so you want me to upload to jaunty? | 19:20 |
| asac | when did you ask me last time ;)? | 19:20 |
| fta | yes, but it's not closed yet | 19:20 |
| fta | never | 19:20 |
| fta | :) | 19:20 |
| asac | hah | 19:20 |
| asac | not nice to omit details that make me feel guilty/lacking behind ;) | 19:21 |
| wikz | asac to have a get-orig target and the binonly.sh stuff and all | 19:21 |
| asac | wikz: to make your own package without touching it, right? | 19:21 |
| wikz | asac: I decided to create a no bin only pkg like you guys do | 19:21 |
| asac | yeah | 19:22 |
| wikz | we don't have the bandwidth to support extra stuff :( | 19:22 |
| asac | wikz: i would suggest that you include it, but dont use other features then the orig stuff ... in that way you can produce orig on jaunty and all is fine | 19:22 |
| fta | i have a few packages already hosting their own mozclient files, ff 3.1 & 3.2, xul 1.9.1 & 1.9.2, fennec, xul-explorer, instantbird and bluegriffon | 19:25 |
| wikz | asac: but reviewers ask for a get-orig target and all that stuff and since we only host the spicebird code and not the entire TB trunk, I dunno how to create a get-orig target even with moz devscripts. | 19:25 |
| fta | ff anx xul could serve as examples | 19:25 |
| wikz | fta: I modified the tb3.conf files but the problem is we don't host the entire code. One needs to checkout mozilla_TAG_THUNDERBIRD_3_0a2_RELEASE ,then our trunk, merge them both. run a patch script. is it possible to do this with 0.10 ? | 19:27 |
| asac | i think thats what m-d-s is designed to do ... plumbering sources from many trees together | 19:28 |
| asac | and stirring around ;) | 19:28 |
| fta | our ff fetches does something like that already, the 2nd branch is for the branding | 19:28 |
| asac | later multi-multi-patchsets on the fly and taking over the world from there | 19:28 |
| asac | :) | 19:28 |
| fta | -fetches | 19:29 |
| asac | yep | 19:29 |
| asac | that should be a good start ;) | 19:29 |
| wikz | fta: I will look into ff3.conf, right ? | 19:29 |
| fta | yes | 19:29 |
| fta | look for 3.1 or 3.2 | 19:29 |
| fta | directly in the ff branches, not in m-d | 19:29 |
| wikz | asac: lol, I am a python dev here and switching from python to perl to bash confuses the hell out of me | 19:30 |
| wikz | fta: alright | 19:30 |
| wikz | fta: we don't host any non free code, if you may want to host our conf files too at a later stage :P | 19:30 |
| fta | you mean, your conf/mk files inside m-d ? | 19:32 |
| fta | the plan is to remove them all from m-d | 19:32 |
| wikz | fta: oh and ...? | 19:32 |
| fta | host them in each package | 19:32 |
| wikz | ok ok | 19:33 |
| fta | so when you want to update them, no need to update m-d | 19:33 |
| wikz | fta: MOZCLIENT_POSTCOCMD is the one right ? | 19:33 |
| fta | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.2.head/files/head%3A/debian/mozclient/ | 19:33 |
| asac | wikz: you probably need a bunch of vars | 19:33 |
| fta | + 2 variables in debian/rules | 19:34 |
| fta | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.2.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/rules | 19:34 |
| fta | MOZCLIENT_PROJECTNAME := $(DEBIAN_NAME) | 19:34 |
| wikz | fta: done those | 19:34 |
| fta | MOZCLIENT_PROJECTDIR := $(CURDIR)/debian/mozclient | 19:34 |
| fta | that it | 19:34 |
| fta | +'s | 19:35 |
| wikz | :) I read your readme | 19:35 |
| fta | great ;) | 19:35 |
| fta | yes MOZCLIENT_POSTCOCMD. it's a shell script. | 19:36 |
| wikz | asac: sunil was asking me if so many DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS are really required. He generally doesn't like them. | 19:36 |
| wikz | fta: after installing, sb doesn't come up in the default mail apps or in the right click>send to menu! what could be the fix? | 19:42 |
| asac | wikz: we need speicific configure flags. a general statement doesnt help ;) | 19:50 |
| wikz | fta: will m-d 0.12 make it to debian testing also because I will eventually have to pursue that too? | 19:53 |
| asac | lenny? probably not | 19:55 |
| asac | we should upload it once its released though | 19:55 |
| asac | you never know when debian releases ;) | 19:55 |
| wikz | asac: lol | 19:57 |
| wikz | asac: if 0.12 has not made it to jaunty and I have a build dep on 0.12 it will essentially mean I'm stuck up till then? | 20:01 |
| asac | wikz: as i said: dont make it a build depend; just include it optionally in rules | 20:04 |
| asac | then you just need to produce tarballs in jaunty | 20:04 |
| asac | but can build everywhere | 20:04 |
| wikz | asac: okie dokie | 20:04 |
| fta | wikz, did it work? | 20:10 |
| wikz | still dloading sources :) | 20:11 |
| fta | ok | 20:11 |
| wikz | fta: will let you know :) | 20:11 |
| fta | ok | 20:11 |
| asac | damn ... experiencing long nfs hangs | 20:15 |
| wikz | fta: earlier in the day, I ran lintian against my binary pkgs, http://paste.ubuntu.com/101260/ Can you suggest which ones I need to fix and which ones I can ignore | 20:16 |
| fta | debian-changelog-file-is-a-symlink => i'd say ignore for ubuntu. *If* it was for main, we would care about every single byte for the CD. For universe, it doesn't matter much. | 20:18 |
| asac | The tree is OPEN.However, 1 box is orange and 5 are burning, so this might not be a good time to check in -- check with the sheriff. | 20:18 |
| asac | :) | 20:18 |
| asac | http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/ | 20:18 |
| fta | spelling-error-in-description: i usually fix that | 20:18 |
| fta | image-file-in-usr-lib: we don't care in ubuntu. it's too pedantic and too much work for the maintainer. | 20:19 |
| asac | in ubuntu we have a shaking automagic to replace equal files with symlinks | 20:20 |
| asac | so this debian-changelog- thing probably doesnt happen if built on debian | 20:20 |
| [reed] | [02:18:52PM] <fta> spelling-error-in-description: i usually fix that <-- error in what? | 20:20 |
| asac | [reed]: package description ;) | 20:20 |
| fta | executable-not-elf-or-script: bad; fix absolutely. look at my xul 1.9.1 branch for an example | 20:20 |
| [reed] | ah, whose fault? | 20:20 |
| fta | [reed], go back to sleep | 20:20 |
| asac | [reed]: lintian is a policy check tool that you can run against package binaries and sources | 20:20 |
| fta | ;) | 20:20 |
| [reed] | it's 2:20pm! | 20:21 |
| [reed] | ah, lintian | 20:21 |
| asac | [reed]: and it spits out more or less sensible warnings/errors | 20:21 |
| [reed] | ok | 20:21 |
| * [reed] goes back to work | 20:21 | |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/101260/ | 20:21 |
| asac | [reed]: ^^ | 20:21 |
| asac | like those ;) | 20:21 |
| asac | wikz: you can override the lintian warnings | 20:21 |
| fta | postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig: well, somewhat obscure. cdbs fault i would say, there's not much you can do | 20:21 |
| asac | yes | 20:22 |
| asac | hmm | 20:22 |
| asac | you have to include the #DEBHELPER# placeholder i think | 20:22 |
| asac | at the end of the file | 20:22 |
| asac | but i think i already looked and that doesnt fix it | 20:22 |
| fta | menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format: fix it | 20:22 |
| fta | done | 20:22 |
| wikz | fta: definitely | 20:22 |
| asac | do we ship .xpm for official branding? | 20:22 |
| asac | i think you can ignore it | 20:22 |
| fta | not anymore | 20:22 |
| asac | at best ship it in .svg format ;) | 20:22 |
| fta | xpm is deprecated upstream | 20:22 |
| asac | if possible you can add .xpm for really old systems | 20:23 |
| fta | png | 20:23 |
| asac | svg is the preferred format for modern menus | 20:23 |
| fta | yep, but moz ships png | 20:23 |
| asac | but often hard to get ;) | 20:23 |
| asac | sure ... copyright reasons ;) | 20:23 |
| asac | (blind guess) | 20:23 |
| wikz | asac: prasad had plans of implemeting the entire calendar module in svg :) and scrap the lightning extension for sb | 20:24 |
| tonyyarusso | sebner: BlueGriffon will replace KompoZer, but not until at least fall. | 20:24 |
| sebner | kk | 20:24 |
| wikz | fta: thanks for the review | 20:24 |
| fta | asac, care to look at my testsuite thing? | 20:25 |
| * fta testing a wifi liveradio | 20:26 | |
| fta | kind of nice | 20:27 |
| asac | white: so that thing turned out to be caused by MFSA shuffling | 20:28 |
| asac | white: -59 will get a CVE soon i think | 20:28 |
| fta | http://www.amazon.com/Baracoda-BPHX001A-Phoenix-Wifi-Radio/dp/B000T4GAVU/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1231273605&sr=8-13 | 20:32 |
| fta | asac, where is Components.classes defined? | 20:37 |
| asac | fta: nsComponentManager i would guess | 20:41 |
| asac | not 100% sure how its mapped to JS | 20:41 |
| asac | why? | 20:41 |
| fta | tracking my bug | 20:41 |
| BUGabundo | good evening everyone! | 20:42 |
| BUGabundo | fta: found a nice symptom | 20:42 |
| fta | 'evening | 20:43 |
| BUGabundo | having only one browser open, and clicing on a link will just open a tab from the opened browser | 20:43 |
| BUGabundo | it used to open the default browser if it was closed, even if a diff version browser was open | 20:43 |
| fta | yes, same bug | 20:43 |
| fta | one of the two from yesterday | 20:44 |
| BUGabundo | plus that that I mention on the email | 20:44 |
| BUGabundo | that x-www-broswser shows no 3. | 20:44 |
| asac | BUGabundo: one trick is to use a different profile name for 3.1 | 20:45 |
| BUGabundo | let me chek | 20:45 |
| BUGabundo | same name: "new" | 20:45 |
| fta | asac, care to look at this one ? i mean, the Profile field ignored for concurrent versions | 20:49 |
| fta | asac, otherwise, i'll revert my profile change. too bad, it was cleaner | 20:50 |
| asac | fta: i looked into it | 20:50 |
| asac | fta: its not a bug | 20:50 |
| asac | fta: it checks for the profile name | 20:50 |
| asac | not the profile path | 20:50 |
| asac | profile path would be a "new" feature | 20:50 |
| asac | profile name == -> start firefox -P and create a new profile | 20:50 |
| asac | the name you choose there is the name matched | 20:51 |
| BUGabundo | let me rename my profile for 3.0 | 20:51 |
| BUGabundo | and try some debuging | 20:51 |
| fta | asac, you mean it look at Name, not profile name | 20:51 |
| asac | fta: so we need to add a new field "profile_path" | 20:51 |
| asac | fta: it looks at the profile name ;) | 20:51 |
| asac | like "default", "test" | 20:51 |
| asac | maybe its "name" in the struct | 20:51 |
| fta | Profile=Mozilla/Firefox-3.1 | 20:51 |
| asac | fta: yes. thats not the profile used in the code | 20:52 |
| asac | so yes. its Name ;) | 20:52 |
| asac | err no | 20:52 |
| asac | its not name | 20:52 |
| fta | it is used. | 20:52 |
| asac | its really profile :) | 20:52 |
| BUGabundo | no change here | 20:52 |
| asac | like what is in ~/.mozill/profiles.ini | 20:52 |
| asac | so wehave: | 20:52 |
| asac | 1. Name | 20:52 |
| asac | 2. Profile (e.g. the name "default" unless you use the profile manager to create a new one) | 20:53 |
| asac | 3. (not) profile path (the Profile= variable parsed from application.ini) | 20:53 |
| asac | writing a patch should be rather simplish | 20:53 |
| asac | but r- most likely ;) | 20:53 |
| fta | hm, even in ff3.0, add a Profile=Foo/Bar, start it, it will create and use ~/.foo/bar | 20:54 |
| asac | well ... we should match the full-path-to-profile i guess | 20:54 |
| asac | fta: nobody doubts that Profile is used | 20:54 |
| BUGabundo | asac: I tried your idea for weave, but can't make it login at all! | 20:54 |
| asac | fta: its just not the "profile" variable you see in XRemoteClient to find the firefox window ;) | 20:54 |
| BUGabundo | no idea why, and labs mozilla forum or IRC didn't help | 20:54 |
| asac | fta: if you didnt even look at that code, then sorry for the confusion ;) | 20:54 |
| asac | fta: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/src/xremoteclient/XRemoteClient.cpp#455 | 20:55 |
| asac | thats the code that finds the running app | 20:55 |
| asac | it lacks a match and a field in window for the profile path imo | 20:55 |
| asac | that could even replace "profile" ... but i guess we need to keep it for legacy purpose | 20:55 |
| asac | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/src/xremoteclient/XRemoteClient.cpp#571 | 20:56 |
| asac | that aProfile is the name of the profile (e.g. "default" and not the Profile= from app.ini) | 20:56 |
| asac | BUGabundo: not sure what my idea was here | 20:58 |
| BUGabundo | asac: to sync diff profiles and diff PCS | 21:01 |
| asac | ok | 21:01 |
| BUGabundo | https://labs.mozilla.com/forum/account.php?u=865 | 21:02 |
| BUGabundo | BUGabundo, it's likely you need to build the component yourself, yes. | 21:02 |
| asac | dont see anything in the forum there | 21:08 |
| asac | BUGabundo: what error are you getting? | 21:08 |
| asac | problem loading hte component?= | 21:08 |
| asac | are you using i386? | 21:08 |
| BUGabundo | 64 bits jaunty | 21:11 |
| BUGabundo | xpi (32 bits?) got installed! but nothing works! | 21:11 |
| BUGabundo | any click on any option will do nothing | 21:12 |
| BUGabundo | reading now on how to build 64 bits to install it | 21:12 |
| asac | BUGabundo: yes. thats expected | 21:12 |
| asac | they dont have 64 bits most likely | 21:12 |
| asac | run 32bit ffox | 21:12 |
| BUGabundo | LOL | 21:13 |
| * BUGabundo mumbles that's why 64 never takes off | 21:13 | |
| asac | building shouldnt be that hard | 21:13 |
| BUGabundo | asac: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Weave/Building | 21:16 |
| BUGabundo | asac: do I really need http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/nightly/latest-trunk/ ? | 21:18 |
| BUGabundo | or will the one I have installed (1.9.0,1.9.1 & 1.9.2) do? | 21:18 |
| BUGabundo | asac: fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/101303/ | 21:27 |
| BUGabundo | can you guys take a look | 21:27 |
| fta | you need libnspr4-dev | 21:28 |
| fta | and probably libnss3-dev too | 21:29 |
| BUGabundo | installing | 21:31 |
| BUGabundo | fta: I have both | 21:31 |
| BUGabundo | already had them from when I instaled an older version | 21:31 |
| fta | then you need to specify nspr-config --cflags somewhere | 21:34 |
| BUGabundo | humm | 21:34 |
| fta | in the Makefile | 21:34 |
| BUGabundo | stupid question where? | 21:34 |
| fta | stupid answer: donno, i don't have your sources | 21:35 |
| BUGabundo | http://hg.mozilla.org/labs/weave/index.cgi/archive/tip.tar.gz | 21:35 |
| BUGabundo | easy anwser! | 21:35 |
| BUGabundo | https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Weave/Building | 21:36 |
| BUGabundo | hg clone http://hg.mozilla.org/labs/weave | 21:36 |
| fta | i'm currently uploading something big | 21:36 |
| BUGabundo | it aint that big | 21:38 |
| BUGabundo | but I can wait | 21:38 |
| BUGabundo | 421KiBs | 21:38 |
| BUGabundo | LOLOL | 21:38 |
| asac | BUGabundo: use pkg-config --cflags libxul nss | 21:42 |
| asac | and --libs | 21:42 |
| asac | for both | 21:42 |
| fta | http://hg.mozilla.org/labs/weave/file/884eeecf7c70/src/Makefile#l213 | 21:42 |
| asac | the build instructions seem simple enough ;) | 21:42 |
| BUGabundo | you have to go SLOWER than that | 21:43 |
| BUGabundo | for me to keep up | 21:43 |
| fta | in src/Makefile | 21:43 |
| BUGabundo | I did this | 21:43 |
| BUGabundo | make sdkdir=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.1 xpi | 21:43 |
| BUGabundo | but it failed so I changed to 1.9.0.5 | 21:43 |
| BUGabundo | and it worked up until those errors | 21:44 |
| fta | edit src/Makefile, line 215, add at the end of the line $(shell pkg-config --cflags libxul nss) | 21:44 |
| BUGabundo | " libs := $(patsubst %,-l%,$(libs))" ? | 21:45 |
| fta | yes, this one | 21:45 |
| BUGabundo | you missed a coma ',' | 21:45 |
| BUGabundo | libs := $(patsubst %,-l%,$(libs)),$(shell pkg-config --cflags libxul nss) | 21:45 |
| fta | oops, not --cflags but --libs | 21:45 |
| BUGabundo | trying now | 21:45 |
| fta | no coma | 21:46 |
| BUGabundo | libs := $(patsubst %,-l%,$(libs))$(shell pkg-config --libs libxul nss) ? | 21:46 |
| fta | with a space in between | 21:46 |
| BUGabundo | libs := $(patsubst %,-l%,$(libs)) $(shell pkg-config --libs libxul nss) | 21:46 |
| fta | yes | 21:46 |
| fta | and line 222, add the version with --cflags | 21:47 |
| BUGabundo | http://paste.ubuntu.com/101311/ | 21:47 |
| BUGabundo | bah | 21:47 |
| BUGabundo | just got the tail of the log | 21:47 |
| fta | seems fine | 21:47 |
| BUGabundo | -include xpcom-config.h $(headers) --cflags | 21:47 |
| fta | no | 21:47 |
| BUGabundo | no ? | 21:48 |
| fta | -include xpcom-config.h $(headers) $(shell pkg-config --cflags libxul nss) | 21:48 |
| BUGabundo | -include xpcom-config.h $(headers) $(shell pkg-config --cflags libxul nss) | 21:48 |
| fta | yes | 21:48 |
| BUGabundo | ok! | 21:48 |
| BUGabundo | success weave-0.2.96.xpi built | 21:49 |
| BUGabundo | do I need to remove the old one ? | 21:49 |
| BUGabundo | fta: any idea why firefox is failing to restart from the addon button? | 21:50 |
| BUGabundo | it just closes! | 21:50 |
| BUGabundo | ahhh Segmentation fault | 21:50 |
| fta | probably the same bug again. i just fixed it | 21:50 |
| fta | building | 21:50 |
| BUGabundo | *** e = [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) [nsIJSCID.getService]" nsresult: "0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://browser/content/utilityOverlay.js :: getShellService :: line 310" data: no] | 21:51 |
| fta | ask asac, he knows that better than I do | 21:51 |
| asac | BUGabundo: start with a clean profile to test the .xpi | 21:52 |
| asac | who knows what the other 32 bit extension caused ;) | 21:52 |
| BUGabundo | LOL | 21:55 |
| BUGabundo | ok | 21:55 |
| BUGabundo | new profile for FF3.1 | 21:55 |
| asac | ifeq ($(arch), x86) | 21:56 |
| asac | probably should be something like | 21:56 |
| asac | ifneq (,$(filter $(arch),x86 x86_64)) | 21:56 |
| asac | in line 222 | 21:56 |
| asac | and not the change you did above | 21:56 |
| BUGabundo | me? | 21:56 |
| asac | err 223 | 21:56 |
| asac | yes in the same file ... revert what you changed and try that ;) | 21:56 |
| BUGabundo | ifeq ($(arch), x86) | 21:57 |
| BUGabundo | replaces | 21:57 |
| BUGabundo | *replaced | 21:57 |
| BUGabundo | building again | 21:57 |
| BUGabundo | for new xpi for new profile | 21:57 |
| asac | BUGabundo: check that when building that you see the -fshort-char thing in compile line | 21:58 |
| asac | otherwise you Makefile mods are wrong | 21:58 |
| fta | crimsun, help! E: asyncmsgq.c: Assertion 'pa_asyncq_push(a->asyncq, &i, TRUE) == 0' failed at pulsecore/asyncmsgq.c:164, function pa_asyncmsgq_send(). Aborting. | 21:59 |
| fta | crimsun, it's killing me | 21:59 |
| BUGabundo | asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/101323/ | 21:59 |
| BUGabundo | can't see it! | 21:59 |
| asac | BUGabundo: you have to do a make clean | 22:00 |
| asac | after changing build flags in makefiles | 22:00 |
| BUGabundo | I did! | 22:00 |
| fta | hm, hm clone is killing my wifi radio too | 22:00 |
| BUGabundo | I think | 22:00 |
| fta | hg | 22:00 |
| BUGabundo | I just rerun the command | 22:00 |
| BUGabundo | asac: $ clear; make sdkdir=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.5 xpi | 22:00 |
| asac | BUGabundo: no you didnt | 22:00 |
| asac | there is no make clean | 22:00 |
| asac | ;) | 22:01 |
| BUGabundo | ahh | 22:01 |
| asac | you just ran an incremental build | 22:01 |
| asac | not a clean one ;) | 22:01 |
| BUGabundo | http://paste.ubuntu.com/101326/ | 22:01 |
| BUGabundo | line 21 | 22:02 |
| BUGabundo | its there | 22:02 |
| BUGabundo | asac: is it fine now? | 22:02 |
| BUGabundo | can I install it? | 22:02 |
| asac | no | 22:04 |
| asac | that isnt the compile line | 22:04 |
| BUGabundo | bahhh | 22:04 |
| asac | for me it doesnt build with 1.9.0 | 22:04 |
| asac | nspr/nss missing in cflags | 22:05 |
| BUGabundo | no idea | 22:05 |
| BUGabundo | worked for me | 22:05 |
| BUGabundo | as you can see | 22:05 |
| fta | i made you add it | 22:06 |
| BUGabundo | heeehheeh | 22:06 |
| asac | for me it worked | 22:06 |
| asac | BUGabundo: do a: | 22:06 |
| asac | hg diff | patch -p1 -R | 22:06 |
| asac | then apply the patch: http://paste.ubuntu.com/101331/ | 22:06 |
| BUGabundo | I thought asac meant AFTER the changes | 22:06 |
| asac | BUGabundo: first make clean | 22:07 |
| asac | then revert your changes (the hg line) | 22:07 |
| asac | and then apply patch | 22:07 |
| asac | and try to build again | 22:07 |
| * BUGabundo is confused | 22:07 | |
| * BUGabundo warns noob alert! | 22:07 | |
| BUGabundo | I'm too tired!!! worked all day, now trying to do some OpenGL stuff (not going that well) | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | and now all this trouble just to build a xpi?? | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | not worth! | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | I'll move my profiles to a windows 32 bits machine | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | and merge from there! | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | or wait for mozillateam to package it on a PPA | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | lol | 22:09 |
| asac | BUGabundo: do you have a weave account? | 22:09 |
| BUGabundo | yes | 22:09 |
| BUGabundo | a 2.x | 22:09 |
| asac | how did you get it? | 22:09 |
| BUGabundo | just recovered my pass | 22:09 |
| BUGabundo | no idea! | 22:10 |
| BUGabundo | have it for a long time | 22:10 |
| BUGabundo | since early weave builds | 22:10 |
| BUGabundo | http://services.mozilla.com/ | 22:10 |
| BUGabundo | but I also have a local apache with webdav | 22:10 |
| BUGabundo | working, to do a local merge and not on server! | 22:10 |
| BUGabundo | but it seems I need a weave account anyway :( | 22:11 |
| fta | BUGabundo, ff3.1 fixed and ready. upgrade | 22:11 |
| BUGabundo | why did we build a 2.96 when there is a 3.0? | 22:12 |
| BUGabundo | apt-get update & upgrade | 22:12 |
| asac | seems you cannot create new accounts | 22:12 |
| asac | what a bastard ;) | 22:12 |
| asac | have to setup my own webdav | 22:12 |
| BUGabundo | quite easy | 22:12 |
| BUGabundo | after I found the proper wiki | 22:12 |
| BUGabundo | you can use mine, if you need it | 22:13 |
| BUGabundo | I can't use it anyway | 22:13 |
| asac | err | 22:13 |
| asac | apt-cache search webdav apache | 22:13 |
| asac | nothing? | 22:13 |
| BUGabundo | firefox-3.1 (3.1~b3~hg20090103r22626+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1) jaunty; urgency=low | 22:13 |
| BUGabundo | LOLOL | 22:13 |
| asac | ah its included by default | 22:13 |
| asac | in a2 | 22:13 |
| BUGabundo | oh come on!!! even I know that | 22:13 |
| BUGabundo | its a module for apache | 22:14 |
| BUGabundo | you just need to enable it | 22:14 |
| BUGabundo | and run the creation of the dav dir | 22:14 |
| BUGabundo | asac: http://linux.about.com/od/ubusrv_doc/a/ubusg27t08.htm | 22:15 |
| BUGabundo | just ln -s the module from available to enable | 22:16 |
| BUGabundo | asac: here is a better one http://www.digital-arcanist.com/sanctum/article.php?story=20070427101250622 | 22:18 |
| fta | "-10°C, feels like -17.9°C" | 22:23 |
| fta | brrrr | 22:23 |
| BUGabundo | 6º C outside! feels like 20º inside! | 22:27 |
| fta | I still hace 5-7cm of snow from yesterday | 22:28 |
| fta | all frozen now | 22:29 |
| fta | have | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!