[09:26] <white> asac: we had CVE-2008-2810 marked as windows specific, but you have it in the changelog. Can you comment on it? :)
[09:26] <white>  /in the changelog/in the iceape changelog/
[10:00] <white> asac_: we had CVE-2008-2810 marked as windows specific, but you have it in the iceape changelog. Can you comment on it? :)
[10:06] <asac_> white: yes. its not directly affected on linux for us, but the patch is good to have in case someone wrote an extension for url shortcut support
[10:07] <white> ok
[10:17] <white> asac: what did you test in iceape?
[10:17] <white> asac: http/https looks ok
[10:17] <asac> white: as much as i can ;)
[10:17] <white> i'll try ftp now, then downloading some bigger archives
[10:17] <asac> http:/https ... ajax sites
[10:17] <asac> as usual for browser
[10:17] <asac> same for mail i tested for icedove
[10:17] <white> i finished the advisory text for iceape btw
[10:18] <asac> white: can you stresstest iceape too a bit?
[10:19] <white> asac: define stresstest? :)
[10:21] <asac> white: like what i suggested ;)
[10:21] <asac> same tests as for firefox ... same as for icedove
[10:23] <white> asac: for iceape everything except arm arrived
[10:23] <white> asac: for icedove i am waiting for s390 and arm
[10:23] <white> asac: if no regressions occur during testing today, i plan the release for tonight
[10:27] <asac> white: thanks. would be grewat if you could test a iceape a bit too.
[10:27] <asac> white: i will prepare xulrunner asap
[13:54] <white> asac: two issues that occured to me while checking iceape
[13:55] <white> asac: could you please double check that patches for  MFSA 2008-39 and MFSA 2008-48 are included?
[13:55] <white> asac: i can't find the bugnumbers in the series file and the code mentioned in the bugreports doesn't seem to be applied
[13:57] <asac> 439034
[13:57] <asac> ist that in there?
[13:57] <asac> (thats -38)
[13:57] <asac> 433610_attachment_335479.patch
[13:57] <asac> for -39
[13:57] <asac> err -49;)
[13:58] <asac> iceape-1.0.13~pre080614i$ quilt applied | grep 433610_attachment_335479.patch
[13:58] <asac> 433610_attachment_335479.patch
[13:59] <fta2> please, use better names for those patches, add a few words of description
[13:59] <asac> iceape-1.0.13~pre080614i$ quilt applied | grep 439034
[13:59] <asac> 439034_attachment_334011.patch
[13:59] <asac> no ;)
[13:59] <asac> cant do that
[13:59] <asac> even if i could it wouldnt really help a lot. you have to lookup the sec issue anyway i guess
[14:00] <white> asac: thanks for clarifying, so all is good :)
[14:04] <fta2> asac, just xxx_attyyy_mfsa1234.patch is already an improvement
[14:15] <asac> fta2: we do patches ahead of mfsa assignments
[15:09] <fta2> asac, bug 310020
[15:11] <fta2> oh, the bot now displays dupes :)
[15:14] <asac> did that forever?
[15:14] <asac> afaik
[15:15] <asac> fta2: yes its fixed isnt it?
[15:15]  * asac has to upgrade
[15:16] <fta2> donno, my X is on hold
[15:16] <asac> 195 upgraded ;)
[15:16] <asac> fta2: i can tell you soon
[15:17] <asac> guess 10 minutes ;)
[15:17] <asac> btw, besides from that i dont have any bad issues
[15:17] <asac> but i wam on ati ... so who knows ;)
[15:17] <asac> oh new kernel too
[15:18] <asac> i am quite happy that i moved to a fast german ubuntu mirror
[15:18] <asac> archive.ubuntu.com was unbearable for me over the last month's
[15:18] <asac> (when looking back from todays perspective)
[15:19] <fta2> i dl on archive.u.c at my top speed at home. ~7Mbps
[16:08] <asac> fta2: so if we would want to put our patches/packaging in hg.mozilla.org and gluelessly integrate that with mozilla, what would we do? ... probably similar to nss/nspr, just that we pull the debian/ dir on the fly from the right branch?
[16:09] <asac> e.g. MOZ_CO_DISTRO=jaunty
[16:09] <asac> would look in a jaunty/1.9 branch
[16:09] <asac> or something
[16:09] <asac> for 1.9 trees
[16:10] <asac> i guess we could keep using our bzr then ... and pull debian from bzr
[16:11] <asac> or maybe just say: MOZ_CO_PROJECT=browser,jaunty,intrepid :)
[16:11] <asac> and --with-distro-packaging=jaunty,intrepid
[16:11] <asac> for configure
[16:12] <asac> and --with-distro-patches=jaunty,intrepid
[16:12] <asac> more likely
[16:12] <asac> not sur how much sense it makes to integrate real packaging ... but patches might be good
[16:24] <asac> hmm ld segfault :/
[17:33] <BUGabundo> fta: ping
[17:33] <BUGabundo> fta yesterday FF fix works! can have both broswers
[17:39] <fta2> \o/
[17:43] <asac_the_bumber> bumb asac
[17:45] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[18:50] <asac> fta: what did you do to fix bugabundos two profile issue?
[19:01] <fta> asac, i don't have time to dig into the code and apparently, you didn't want to help. As it was a really annoying bug indeed, i just reverted my changes to return to my old ugly hack, as mentioned in the commit logs.
[19:27] <BUGabundo> fta: do you know of any bug with apt:// working (or rather NOT working) with FF ?
[19:27] <BUGabundo> and yes, apturl is installed!
[19:29] <fta> BUGabundo, yes, only ff 3.0 is registered into apturl, not 3.1/3.2
[19:29] <BUGabundo> but it didn't work for me with 3.0
[19:29] <BUGabundo> :\
[19:30] <fta> it supposed to work fine with 3.0
[19:30] <fta> 's
[19:30] <BUGabundo> I need to test it again then
[19:31] <BUGabundo> : 8
[19:31] <BUGabundo> now it worked!
[19:31] <BUGabundo> got the popup!
[19:31] <BUGabundo> didn't work before!
[19:54] <fta> bug 207281
[19:56] <fta> BUGabundo, that was the bug i fixed early last year
[20:01] <BUGabundo> thanks
[20:09] <fta> i can fix apturl in my ppa for 3.1 and 3.2 but i doubt mvo will want the patch
[20:10] <BUGabundo> why?
[20:11] <fta> beta & alpha
[20:11] <BUGabundo> ah
[20:11] <BUGabundo> so you just patch it for final release ?
[20:11] <BUGabundo> should there be a bug open to track it?
[20:11] <BUGabundo> with a milestone?
[20:12] <fta> 3.2 is just in my ppa, so no way. 3.1 is in universe so it's probably possible
[20:13] <BUGabundo> fta what do you think of the idea of creating lp/~ubuntu-mozillateam-project ?
[20:13] <BUGabundo> and file bugs for that project?
[20:13] <fta> what for?
[20:13] <BUGabundo> because USERS PPAs don't have BTS
[20:13] <BUGabundo> :(((
[20:14] <BUGabundo> if there was a project for the mozilla team
[20:14] <fta> i will not help
[20:14] <BUGabundo> with its own branch code, and BTS
[20:14] <fta> it
[20:14] <BUGabundo> and the PPA
[20:14] <BUGabundo> instead on your own user account
[20:14] <BUGabundo> would be better!
[20:14] <BUGabundo> I can create it, and make you or someone else admin!
[20:14] <fta> we have ~mozillateam already
[20:15] <BUGabundo> and ask LP admin to copy the source from your account
[20:15] <BUGabundo> not team.... project!
[20:15] <BUGabundo> teams don't have BTS either1
[20:15] <BUGabundo> launchpad.net/mozillateam
[20:16] <BUGabundo> humm /me re-read! I inserted a '~' too much!
[20:17] <BUGabundo> what do you think fta?
[20:19] <fta> I can't handle too many bugs, no time, and no interest either. I just push to my own ppa because it's convenient for me (i control what is in there, in opposition to a shared repo) and i don't force anyone to use my stuff.
[20:20] <BUGabundo> branchs?
[20:20] <fta> so i just ask people to come here if they want to complain
[20:20] <BUGabundo> ah ok
[20:20] <BUGabundo> I was just about to create it at https://staging.launchpad.net/projects/+new
[20:20] <BUGabundo> but since I don't seem to like the idea
[20:20] <fta> my branches are shared, all in ~mt, even if i'm the only contributor
[20:20] <BUGabundo> I guess there is no need for you
[20:21] <BlackHawk> do you give any support about thunderbird here? (I'm running ubuntu and this error just happens there ...)
[20:24] <fta> BlackHawk, not me in particular. depends of what you need. support is officially in #ubuntu but they may send you here.
[20:25] <BlackHawk> well ... #ubuntu gets flooded with messages :D and my specific problem is a localhost-error with the webmail-extension
[20:26] <fta> i'm not the guy for that, but ask, maybe asac or someone else will help
[20:31] <BlackHawk> ok :) thx
[20:42] <BlackHawk> ok ... I know sth new: Thunderbird can't start my localhost-server
[20:42] <BlackHawk> in the statusbar it says "connecting to localhost..."
[20:42] <BlackHawk> but that didn't finish yet (and I don't think it will)
[21:06] <armin76> asac: the patch didn't work :/
[21:22] <asac> BlackHawk: i am afraid, but we cannot really support extensions here
[21:22] <asac> armin76: not sure which patch
[21:30] <BlackHawk> asac, I understand that ;) no prob^^
[21:51] <armin76> asac: the sigbus patch
[21:52] <asac> armin76: long time ago ... pointer?
[21:54] <armin76> lol
[21:55] <armin76> asac: i told you yesterday: i have a new patch that fixes the sigbus done by one of the gentoo sparc devs
[21:55] <armin76> you slacker!
[22:20] <[reed]> armin76: attach it to bugzilla?
[22:20] <[reed]> request review?
[22:20] <[reed]> or are you just being a bum?
[23:30] <asac> armin76: fail
[23:33] <armin76> [reed]: uh? before you reconnected i told asac that it didn't work :P