=== savvas is now known as savvas_ === savvas_ is now known as savvas [17:38] hi fellas! [17:41] * _MMA_ waves. [17:41] <_MMA_> rsc-: Been pretty quiet lately. [17:42] seems like it, yeah. [17:42] hi rsc- [17:43] rsc-: what are you up to these days? [17:44] working. :/ [17:44] not the worst option :) [17:45] <_MMA_> +1 [17:45] though ive gotten a few hours to put together a new theme [17:45] (but it's still in the mockup stage :p) [17:46] :) [17:46] http://i35.tinypic.com/qrg6l4.jpg [17:48] rsc-: polished aluminum buttons? [17:48] lol, yeah. [17:49] rsc-: the flat signs on them don't work that well [17:49] oh well, its not much but it's a bit of progress at least [17:49] flag signs? [17:49] rsc-: the triangles and stuff [17:49] oh, erm, okay [17:50] rsc-: one would expect either the metal to shine through, or the symbols to be carved [17:50] i was trying to do an inset effect on those back/forward/stop glyphs [17:52] ...either way, i dont think it's very good progress overall. I thought I'd get somewhere good with a "pro"-looking black/aluminum combo, but it ended up looking very mac-like [17:52] how about elsewhere in the Ubuntu front? any updates on projects? [17:52] ...breathe? [17:52] good thing i don't have to mention that ;) [17:53] rsc-: Sebastian is still filling in icons one by one [17:53] where's the latest preview? [17:53] while i let little things here and there keep me from finishing the svg theme file [17:54] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions [17:54] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Icons [17:55] eep, go-previous isn't how I believe breathe should be [17:56] it's in submissions ... it will never go elsewhere ;) [17:56] but it seems to be going pretty nicely :) [17:57] sigh [17:57] i'd really like to contribute but I'd really rather work on pixels instead of vector :p [17:58] excuses :) [17:58] * thorwil -> dinner [17:59] <_MMA_> rsc-: Don't you owe me a Studio wallpaper? :) [17:59] * _MMA_ ducks. [18:00] <_MMA_> And go-previous will be removed soon. he other artist has done nothing with it. [18:00] haha :P [18:00] i've still no idea what to do with it. [18:01] <_MMA_> Still have the emails I sent? I was just thinking something in the shape of our logo. [18:02] <_MMA_> Some kinda background. I like the feel of your original ibex. How the bg and Ibex were separate. [18:02] <_MMA_> And I like your screenshot there. Slick. [18:37] cimi , you there? [18:37] y [18:49] I saw a post on your blog about metacity compositing from svn [18:50] http://www.cimitan.com/blog/2007/12/08/metacity-con-ombre-e-trasparenze-e-nel-repo/ [18:51] its in Italian, but I was wondering whether it was regarding transparency or fade effects for windows? [18:52] tretle, compositing is enabled by default [18:52] if you are not using compiz [18:53] gconftool-2 --set /apps/metacity/general/compositing_manager --type bool true [18:54] enabled by default in what? [18:55] I have been using metacity-compositing for some time and was hoping that that post was about updates to it because I have noticed the same bugs in all ubuntu releases thus far and no new features seem to be developed [18:58] tretle, that post is old [18:58] anyway there's an interesting -but not blogged on the web- work from opened hand [18:59] intel is sponsoring some works for a clutter backend for metacity compositing [18:59] allowing to use opengl instead xrender [18:59] that means more effects [19:00] also means incompatibility with more hardware [19:00] of course [19:02] would prefer if the current xrender bugs where fixed before the clutter work is done, that way metacity gnome could use the clutter backend when available and the xrender as a fallback rather than having just clutter and a non composited backend [19:03] two of the biggest bugs to fix would be the lack of shadow effects upon restart and video overlaying gtk windows on top [19:04] "lack of shadow effects upon restart" [19:04] ? [19:05] while the second bug seems more a xorg/driver issue [19:06] basically when you enable metacity-compositing from the gconf editor it adds shadows to the panels but when you restart the shadows are gone... the only way to get them back is by switching metacity-compositing off and then back on again from the gconf-editor [19:07] where? [19:07] on the panel? [19:07] windows have shadows here after restart [19:07] just the panel hasn't [19:07] yup the panel [19:08] known bug [19:09] * Cimi -> away [20:12] Some application text is really faint when using the DarkRoom theme. Is there a workaround? [20:16] <_MMA_> theBishop: Depends. Sometimes it's the app doing something non-standard. Most things have been well-tested but there will always be a few cases. What app? [20:16] <_MMA_> theBishop: You also might wanna search Launchpad to see if the bug is reported. [20:18] _MMA_, it's basically any time the app has application text on a white background. Compiz Settings Manager, the preferences menu in Firefox, the tree-view in pgAdmin3, et al [20:20] <_MMA_> Known issues I'm afraid. Patches have been sent to Compiz Settings Manager (and gnome-control-center as they share similar code) but nothing has been accepted. [20:22] so it's not something that can be changed by GTK or the theme engine? [20:22] <_MMA_> No [20:23] determine the background and default the font color to black if the background is not standard [20:25] <_MMA_> It often comes down to app writers assuming the text is always dark. [20:25] <_MMA_> As things are, nothing can be done other than send patches upstream. Hope they take 'em. [20:28] _MMA_, so the issue is the app is overriding the font color, assuming a light background? [20:31] <_MMA_> No. Not overriding it, using certain widgits and assuming text will always be dark without consideration otherwise. *Some* apps hard-cone colors but they are few. FF2 was one. Thunderbird2 is another.