[00:00] --enable-debug=[no/minimum/yes] [00:00] turn on debugging [default=minimum] [00:00] aye [00:19] make and make install when smoothly, but I can't tell if i'm running the new version, or where the supposed extra output is going [00:19] where did it get installed? [00:20] hmm I'm not sure [00:20] is there a way to find out? [00:21] well, yes. the output of configure should say [00:21] probably /usr/local (default for configure) [00:22] ok, i restarted since then but i'll re-run configure [00:22] look at config.log [00:24] I see a line in the log that says prefix='/usr/local' [00:24] that is it [00:25] so you will have to override the normal load path [00:25] is the normal load path not /usr/local? [00:25] it is not [00:25] (unless you added it in) [00:25] i don't believe so [00:26] How do I go about with this override? [00:26] env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/' should work. I think. But I am not a GTK expert [00:29] How would I find out what the normal load path is? [00:30] /usr/local is set aside for local, non-ubuntu-provided, installs [00:32] ok "env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/ GDK_DEBUG=events ./leave_notify_testcase" seems to be working [00:34] kostmo, anyway, you really would not want to replace the official libraries by you make [00:34] yeah, I was worried how I would get rid of mine once I was done testing === Flare183 is now known as FlareDS [00:35] but I'd say this went pretty smoothly [00:35] thanks for your help! now I'll be able to generate a trace to post [00:36] welcome, kostmo === FlareDS is now known as Flare183 [02:51] how do i reassign this bug to openoffice.org in ubuntu, bug 316692 [02:51] Launchpad bug 316692 in openoffice-pkgs "Chart data taken from first sheet only" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/316692 [02:51] i tried changing it to 'openoffice.org' but launchpad barfs on it [02:52] does it require i make a new task (GAG)? [02:53] i tried also reassigning it to just ubuntu but it didn't seem to like that either [02:54] it claims also there are 2 errors but it only shows one to me afaict [02:59] calc, that bug isnt currently filed under Ubuntu [02:59] if you want to file it under Ubuntu as well, click on Also affects distribution [02:59] Rocket2DMn: yea and no way to reassign it to it, without making a new task which is annoying since you can't delete invalid tasks so you always get bugmail about it [03:00] well its currently filed against a project, not a packag ein ubuntu [03:00] one of the biggests annoyances with launchpad [03:00] Rocket2DMn: yea, but you can't reassign between projects like you can between packages in ubuntu without having to create a new task [03:00] i happen to be the owner of the project so i will always get duplicate email now about this bug [03:01] hopefully the fix to allow deletion of bugtasks will come sooner than later [03:02] * calc is surprised that wasn't one of the first features complained about when launchpad was initially rolled out [03:02] you shouldnt get multiple emails about it b/c its the same bug number [03:02] Rocket2DMn: oh ok [03:03] i get lots of email that i shouldn't due to this issue in general but in this case perhaps i won't get duplicate mail :) [03:04] you can always unsubscribe from bugs too [03:06] gl, im out [03:18] hey folks... [03:18] will this be were the pre-global bug jam sessions will be held? [05:43] Can someone who is an admin on bugsquad fix my account? Its about expire, and clicking renew only gave me three extra hours .... [06:39] good morning [07:10] dholbach: good morning, I always know it is time for me to retire for the evening when I see your good morning post in the bug squad chat room.:) We really are a global community. [07:11] duanedesign: where are you based? :) [07:14] dholbach: U.S. Tulsa, Oklahoma more specifically [07:14] your in Europe I think? [07:14] duanedesign: that clearly sounds like bed o' clock [07:14] duanedesign: yep, Berlin, Germany [07:15] dholbach: Oh. Some of us were wondering if it'd be possible to get the SVG (or whatever other source) of the bugjam logo thing [07:16] Flannel: you'd need to ask kwwii about it - I think he did it [07:18] Alright, thanks [08:24] hello bugsquad! === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn === savvas is now known as savvas_ === savvas_ is now known as savvas === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [10:25] hello thekorn! [10:26] (wow, only 2h response time) [10:26] hi afflux ;) === corge is now known as fdd [13:52] bug 295719 [13:52] Launchpad bug 295719 in matplotlib "python-matplotlib: Exception when drawing image on 64-bit system" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/295719 === eights is now known as baytes === ziroday` is now known as ziroday [15:04] good morning to all [15:08] Boo [16:29] what's the difference between irc.freenode.org and irc.ubuntu.org? [16:29] is this here also right for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad [16:30] benste: none afaik. its just an alias [16:30] BUGabundo_work thanks === mvo_ is now known as mvo === ara_ is now known as ara [16:55] pedro_: Have you seen anything like bug 125130? I've been testing for 24 hours on Intrepid and have been unable to recreate it. [16:55] Launchpad bug 125130 in ubuntu "Shift + Numpad option fails at random" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/125130 [16:58] bdmurray: nope nothing like that [16:59] pedro_: which package should it be filed about? [16:59] bdmurray: could you assign it to gnome-control-center for now? [16:59] bdmurray: ^ ;-) [17:19] anyone here? [17:19] !anyone [17:19] A large amount of the first questions asked in this channel start with "Does anyone/anybody..." Why not ask your next question (the real one) and find out? [17:19] When a bug is set as invalid do I remove the bug tags as well? [17:19] no, the tags can stay [17:20] All you need is to change the Status and put a comment in about it [17:21] Is this ok: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/moodle/+bug/164915 [17:21] Ubuntu bug 164915 in moodle "No update-notifier in Ubuntu Server" [Low,Invalid] [17:23] Well, it is a packaging bug, so bugsquad would normally leave it alone. But, if you are the dev, yes it is good. [17:25] I'm not the dev of moodle, I just checked the sources and compared the bash scripts of debian/postinst (and other files related to "update-notifier") [17:25] maybe it was present in an earlier version, the good thing is that it's not present now :) [17:26] thanks for the help :) [17:27] charlie-tca: can you set its importance to Low? I'm not a member of Bugsquad yet [17:27] sorry, I meant *unset its importance [17:27] It does not need to be unset if status is changed to invalid. It is okay :-) [17:28] The importance no longer counts when you set status to invalid [17:28] oh cool then [17:28] on to the next one :P [17:29] Good job! [17:29] Thanks for helping [17:36] reporting a kernel panic - what's the package? [17:37] What version of ubuntu? [17:37] 8.04 and higher, linux [17:38] thanks [17:38] ibex, 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64 [17:40] package will be "linux" === asac_ is now known as asac [17:47] Is there any bugsquad admins around? === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [19:11] * Netcowboy Down [19:15] can someone confirm a thunderbird bug in intrepid before I file a report? [19:17] information in subject line for certain UTF8 specified RSS feeds doesn't seem to get encoded correctly. [19:24] Can someone set this to Triaged: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/116417 [19:24] Ubuntu bug 116417 in puppet "puppetmasterd and puppetca have no man pages" [Low,Confirmed] [19:24] yeah [19:24] I've forwarded it to debian and sent patches there [19:25] thanks maco :) [19:25] I think I'm ready to join the bugsquad :P [19:26] savvas: Then go ahead and join the team on Launchpad. It is an open team [19:26] bug squad is open membership [19:27] ah wait, I meant the other team where I have access to set the status to Triaged [19:27] Bug Control [19:27] thanks [19:27] I'll enroll myself for approval [19:27] savvas: You need to send an application to the mailing list for that team [19:28] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl for info right? [19:29] I'll read about it, thanks for the information :) [19:48] can bug #93292 be closed? [19:48] Launchpad bug 93292 in gnome-session "gnome-session dialog could use gnome-power-manager" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/93292 [21:04] i just have filed a bug against checkinstall: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkinstall/+bug/317255 [21:04] Ubuntu bug 317255 in checkinstall "checkinstall is not compatible with the recent changes Ubuntu made to dev packaging" [Undecided,New] [21:10] EagleScreen - that doesn't look like a bug [21:10] it looks like user error [21:10] are you using the control file shipped with the kmess source package? [21:11] No; he'll be using checkinstall, which builds its own control file. [21:11] i didn't think checkinstall built its own control file? (sorry, i havent used it in a little while) [21:12] i thought that you had to manually create the control file as it would appear in the binary package when using checkinstall [21:12] or maybe i'm really confused:/ [21:12] ah [21:12] i'm wrong i think [21:12] d'oh [21:13] AFAIK, checkinstall does everything for you. You run it instead of "make install", and it generates all sorts of badness. [21:13] yeah, checkinstall is truly horrid [21:14] IIRC correctly, checkinstall asks you to manually specify the dependencies [21:14] i could be wrong though. it's been a long time since i used it [22:10] hi seb128, would you mind taking a quick look at bug 317248 - it seems to be a regression of bug 150854. i had a quick look at the upstream report, and got the impression that all packages calling ghelp:gnome-feedback need updating [22:10] Launchpad bug 317248 in gnome-applets "Weather-applet Help/ URI "ghelp:gnome-feedback" error" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/317248 [22:10] Launchpad bug 150854 in gnome-user-docs "ghelp:gnome-feedback doesn't work in Feisty" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150854 [22:11] so i wasnt sure if it should remain a gnome-applets bug or should be a gnome-user-docs bug [22:14] chrisccoulson: seems to be http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335968 which is still open [22:14] Gnome bug 335968 in docs "Fold Feedback docs into the User Guide" [Enhancement,Unconfirmed] [22:15] chrisccoulson: that's not a gnome-applets bug, not sure what upstream component should have this documentation though but that's rather an GNOME question [22:15] thanks, yeah i wasn't sure. gnome bug 335968 was linked from bug 150854, but that got closed as fixed [22:15] Launchpad bug 150854 in gnome-user-docs "ghelp:gnome-feedback doesn't work in Feisty" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150854 [22:15] right, not sure why [22:15] i'll link the upstream gnome bug for now - it seems that this is still something that they're trying to work out anyway [22:15] there is no gnome-feedback current installed [22:15] right [22:16] yeah, the gnome bug says the "ghelp:gnome-feedback" link should be migrated to "ghelp:user-guide?feedback" across the whole of the gnome documentation [22:17] at least that is how i read it [22:18] that's something they should sort either way is correct [22:19] either they should update the code to call the correct uri or they should make what is called working [22:19] yeah, i agree. thanks [22:20] thank you for the bug work you are doing ;-) [22:22] you're welcome:) === andrew_ is now known as asomething [22:42] I just had a talk in #ubuntu+1 where someone else confirmed, that the 2.6.28-4 initramfs has an error which prevents people from booting in a encrypted lvm setup. [22:44] that bug is fixed i think [22:44] cant remember the bug number off the top of my head [22:44] the initramfs hook didn't create the /etc/udev/rules.d folder [22:46] bug 314879 [22:46] Launchpad bug 314879 in lvm2 "root on LVM broken since latest udev 136-2" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/314879 [22:46] thats the one [22:47] That one's beeen fixed, yeah. There's actually another one, which'll have to do with cryptsetup. [22:48] thanks RAOF [22:49] Yes right I just installed all the newest updates a few minutes ago so this is another bug. [22:56] Wtf, if i search for linux-image-2.6.28-4-generic it says: No packages matching 'linux-image-2.6.28-4-generic' are published in Ubuntu. [22:58] rbrunhuber: You're after cryptsetup. [22:59] RAOF: is it cryptsetup or initramfs(-tools) [23:00] rbrunhuber: _Probably_ cryptsetup. [23:01] RAOF: if I unterstood you right cryptsetup is not included in initramfs [23:01] Well, it is. It's just not getting called correctly, it seems. [23:01] So what should be the bug summary?< [23:02] RAOF: cryptsetup not called in initram on linux-image-2.6.28-4-generic? [23:03] cryptsetup for cryptroot not called in initramfs. [23:03] The linux-image bit is almost certainly irrelevant. [23:04] RAOF: Not really as the installation of the image triggers the update which causes this mess. [23:04] But you can trigger it in other ways. [23:04] RAOF: meaning the update of the initramfs [23:05] Yeah. Run "sudo update-initramfs -k all -u". That'll break the other kernels for you :) [23:05] Mention it in the description if you want, but I don't think you want it in the summary. [23:05] RAOF: I'll go for: cryptsetup for root on encrypted lvm not called in initramfs. [23:05] Sounds good to me. [23:08] RAOF: What logs and other information should i provide? [23:09] RAOF: I think everything suggested on the bugreport screen is useless, because i do not run the flawed config. Am I right? [23:10] apt-cache policy of cryptsetup, lvm2, watershed, and udev is likely to be interesting. [23:11] Oh, and possibly initramfs-tools [23:18] RAOF: please have a look on bug 317297 [23:18] Launchpad bug 317297 in ubuntu "[jaunty] cryptsetup for root on encrypted lvm not called in initramfs." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/317297 [23:19] RAOF: Maybe you can also confirm it. [23:23] RAOF: ping [23:23] Doing so now. [23:35] RAOF: You lucky man being in sydney... [23:35] It's too hot :P [23:36] RAOF: Tell me it is too hot we have up to -20 °C in germany... [23:36] rbrunhuber: This has bugged me for a while... What's the compose sequence for °? :) [23:37] RAOF: what do you mean? [23:37] How did you type the degrees symbol. [23:38] RAOF: On the german keyboard it is just left of the 1 key. [23:38] RAOF: So you press shift + "left of 1 key" [23:39] Lucky you :) [23:40] RAOF: You have the degrees, we can at least type them ;-) [23:42] RAOF: maybe you can try alt+0176 [23:43] * RAOF doesn't care _that_ much. [23:43] :) [23:47] RAOF: Thanks for confirming my bugreport. Hope it gets fixed soon. [23:51] It's 39° here, I missed how hot it was for RAOF.