[00:00] <kostmo>   --enable-debug=[no/minimum/yes]
[00:00] <kostmo>                           turn on debugging [default=minimum]
[00:00] <hggdh> aye
[00:19] <kostmo> make and make install when smoothly, but I can't tell if i'm running the new version, or where the supposed extra output is going
[00:19] <hggdh> where did it get installed?
[00:20] <kostmo> hmm I'm not sure
[00:20] <kostmo> is there a way to find out?
[00:21] <hggdh> well, yes. the output of configure should say
[00:21] <hggdh> probably /usr/local (default for configure)
[00:22] <kostmo> ok, i restarted since then but i'll re-run configure
[00:22] <hggdh> look at config.log
[00:24] <kostmo> I see a line in the log that says prefix='/usr/local'
[00:24] <hggdh> that is it
[00:25] <hggdh> so you will have to override the normal load path
[00:25] <kostmo> is the normal load path not /usr/local?
[00:25] <hggdh> it is not
[00:25] <hggdh> (unless you added it in)
[00:25] <kostmo> i don't believe so
[00:26] <kostmo> How do I go about with this override?
[00:26] <hggdh> env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/<whatever>' should work. I think. But I am not a GTK expert
[00:29] <kostmo> How would I find out what the normal load path is?
[00:30] <hggdh> /usr/local is set aside for local, non-ubuntu-provided, installs
[00:32] <kostmo> ok "env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/ GDK_DEBUG=events ./leave_notify_testcase" seems to be working
[00:34] <hggdh> kostmo, anyway, you really would not want to replace the official libraries by you make
[00:34] <kostmo> yeah, I was worried how I would get rid of mine once I was done testing
[00:35] <kostmo> but I'd say this went pretty smoothly
[00:35] <kostmo> thanks for your help! now I'll be able to generate a trace to post
[00:36] <hggdh> welcome, kostmo
[02:51] <calc> how do i reassign this bug to openoffice.org in ubuntu, bug 316692
[02:51] <calc> i tried changing it to 'openoffice.org' but launchpad barfs on it
[02:52] <calc> does it require i make a new task (GAG)?
[02:53] <calc> i tried also reassigning it to just ubuntu but it didn't seem to like that either
[02:54] <calc> it claims also there are 2 errors but it only shows one to me afaict
[02:59] <Rocket2DMn> calc, that bug isnt currently filed under Ubuntu
[02:59] <Rocket2DMn> if you want to file it under Ubuntu as well, click on Also affects distribution
[02:59] <calc> Rocket2DMn: yea and no way to reassign it to it, without making a new task which is annoying since you can't delete invalid tasks so you always get bugmail about it
[03:00] <Rocket2DMn> well its currently filed against a project, not a packag ein ubuntu
[03:00] <calc> one of the biggests annoyances with launchpad
[03:00] <calc> Rocket2DMn: yea, but you can't reassign between projects like you can between packages in ubuntu without having to create a new task
[03:00] <calc> i happen to be the owner of the project so i will always get duplicate email now about this bug
[03:01] <calc> hopefully the fix to allow deletion of bugtasks will come sooner than later
[03:02]  * calc is surprised that wasn't one of the first features complained about when launchpad was initially rolled out
[03:02] <Rocket2DMn> you shouldnt get multiple emails about it b/c its the same bug number
[03:02] <calc> Rocket2DMn: oh ok
[03:03] <calc> i get lots of email that i shouldn't due to this issue in general but in this case perhaps i won't get duplicate mail :)
[03:04] <Rocket2DMn> you can always unsubscribe from bugs too
[03:06] <Rocket2DMn> gl, im out
[03:18] <cprofitt> hey folks...
[03:18] <cprofitt> will this be were the pre-global bug jam sessions will be held?
[05:43] <NCommander> Can someone who is an admin on bugsquad fix my account? Its about expire, and clicking renew only gave me three extra hours ....
[06:39] <dholbach> good morning
[07:10] <duanedesign> dholbach: good morning, I always know it is time for me to retire for the evening when I see your good morning post in the bug squad chat room.:) We really are a global community.
[07:11] <dholbach> duanedesign: where are you based? :)
[07:14] <duanedesign> dholbach: U.S. Tulsa, Oklahoma more specifically
[07:14] <duanedesign> your in Europe I think?
[07:14] <dholbach> duanedesign: that clearly sounds like bed o' clock
[07:14] <dholbach> duanedesign: yep, Berlin, Germany
[07:15] <Flannel> dholbach: Oh.  Some of us were wondering if it'd be possible to get the SVG (or whatever other source) of the bugjam logo thing
[07:16] <dholbach> Flannel: you'd need to ask kwwii about it - I think he did it
[07:18] <Flannel> Alright, thanks
[08:24] <thekorn> hello bugsquad!
[10:25] <afflux> hello thekorn!
[10:26] <afflux> (wow, only 2h response time)
[10:26] <thekorn> hi afflux ;)
[13:52] <thekorn> bug 295719
[15:04] <hggdh> good morning to all
[15:08] <bddebian> Boo
[16:29] <benste> what's the difference between irc.freenode.org and irc.ubuntu.org?
[16:29] <benste> is this here also right for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad
[16:30] <BUGabundo_work> benste: none afaik. its just an alias
[16:30] <benste> BUGabundo_work thanks
[16:55] <bdmurray> pedro_: Have you seen anything like bug 125130?  I've been testing for 24 hours on Intrepid and have been unable to recreate it.
[16:58] <pedro_> bdmurray: nope nothing like that
[16:59] <bdmurray> pedro_: which package should it be filed about?
[16:59] <pedro_> bdmurray: could you assign it to gnome-control-center for now?
[16:59] <pedro_> bdmurray: ^ ;-)
[17:19] <savvas> anyone here?
[17:19] <charlie-tca> !anyone
[17:19] <savvas> When a bug is set as invalid do I remove the bug tags as well?
[17:19] <charlie-tca> no, the tags can stay
[17:20] <charlie-tca> All you need is to change the Status and put a comment in about it
[17:21] <savvas> Is this ok: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/moodle/+bug/164915
[17:23] <charlie-tca> Well, it is a packaging bug, so bugsquad would normally leave it alone. But, if you are the dev, yes it is good.
[17:25] <savvas> I'm not the dev of moodle, I just checked the sources and compared the bash scripts of debian/postinst (and other files related to "update-notifier")
[17:25] <savvas> maybe it was present in an earlier version, the good thing is that it's not present now :)
[17:26] <savvas> thanks for the help :)
[17:27] <savvas> charlie-tca: can you set its importance to Low? I'm not a member of Bugsquad yet
[17:27] <savvas> sorry, I meant *unset its importance
[17:27] <charlie-tca> It does not need to be unset if status is changed to invalid. It is okay :-)
[17:28] <charlie-tca> The importance no longer counts when you set status to invalid
[17:28] <savvas> oh cool then
[17:28] <savvas> on to the next one :P
[17:29] <charlie-tca> Good job!
[17:29] <charlie-tca> Thanks for helping
[17:36] <CarlFK1> reporting a kernel panic - what's the package?
[17:37] <charlie-tca> What version of ubuntu?
[17:37] <charlie-tca> 8.04 and higher, linux
[17:38] <CarlFK1> thanks
[17:38] <CarlFK1> ibex, 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64
[17:40] <charlie-tca> package will be "linux"
[17:47] <NCommander> Is there any bugsquad admins around?
[19:11]  * Netcowboy Down
[19:15] <karooga> can someone confirm a thunderbird bug in intrepid before I file a report?
[19:17] <karooga> information in subject line for certain UTF8 specified RSS feeds doesn't seem to get encoded correctly.
[19:24] <savvas> Can someone set this to Triaged: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/116417
[19:24] <maco> yeah
[19:24] <savvas> I've forwarded it to debian and sent patches there
[19:25] <savvas> thanks maco :)
[19:25] <savvas> I think I'm ready to join the bugsquad :P
[19:26] <nhandler> savvas: Then go ahead and join the team on Launchpad. It is an open team
[19:26] <maco> bug squad is open membership
[19:27] <savvas> ah wait, I meant the other team where I have access to set the status to Triaged
[19:27] <nhandler> Bug Control
[19:27] <savvas> thanks
[19:27] <savvas> I'll enroll myself for approval
[19:27] <nhandler> savvas: You need to send an application to the mailing list for that team
[19:28] <savvas> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl for info right?
[19:29] <savvas> I'll read about it, thanks for the information :)
[19:48] <MrKanister> can bug #93292 be closed?
[21:04] <EagleScreen> i just have filed a bug against checkinstall: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkinstall/+bug/317255
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> EagleScreen - that doesn't look like a bug
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> it looks like user error
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> are you using the control file shipped with the kmess source package?
[21:11] <RAOF> No; he'll be using checkinstall, which builds its own control file.
[21:11] <chrisccoulson> i didn't think checkinstall built its own control file? (sorry, i havent used it in a little while)
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> i thought that you had to manually create the control file as it would appear in the binary package when using checkinstall
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> or maybe i'm really confused:/
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> ah
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> i'm wrong i think
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> d'oh
[21:13] <RAOF> AFAIK, checkinstall does everything for you.  You run it instead of "make install", and it generates all sorts of badness.
[21:13] <chrisccoulson> yeah, checkinstall is truly horrid
[21:14] <chrisccoulson> IIRC correctly, checkinstall asks you to manually specify the dependencies
[21:14] <chrisccoulson> i could be wrong though. it's been a long time since i used it
[22:10] <chrisccoulson> hi seb128, would you mind taking a quick look at bug 317248 - it seems to be a regression of bug 150854. i had a quick look at the upstream report, and got the impression that all packages calling ghelp:gnome-feedback need updating
[22:11] <chrisccoulson> so i wasnt sure if it should remain a gnome-applets bug or should be a gnome-user-docs bug
[22:14] <seb128> chrisccoulson: seems to be http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335968 which is still open
[22:15] <seb128> chrisccoulson: that's not a gnome-applets bug, not sure what upstream component should have this documentation though but that's rather an GNOME question
[22:15] <chrisccoulson> thanks, yeah i wasn't sure. gnome bug 335968 was linked from bug 150854, but that got closed as fixed
[22:15] <seb128> right, not sure why
[22:15] <chrisccoulson> i'll link the upstream gnome bug for now - it seems that this is still something that they're trying to work out anyway
[22:15] <seb128> there is no gnome-feedback current installed
[22:15] <seb128> right
[22:16] <chrisccoulson> yeah, the gnome bug says the "ghelp:gnome-feedback" link should be migrated to "ghelp:user-guide?feedback" across the whole of the gnome documentation
[22:17] <chrisccoulson> at least that is how i read it
[22:18] <seb128> that's something they should sort either way is correct
[22:19] <seb128> either they should update the code to call the correct uri or they should make what is called working
[22:19] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i agree. thanks
[22:20] <seb128> thank you for the bug work you are doing ;-)
[22:22] <chrisccoulson> you're welcome:)
[22:42] <rbrunhuber> I just had a talk in #ubuntu+1 where someone else confirmed, that the 2.6.28-4 initramfs has an error which prevents people from booting in a encrypted lvm setup.
[22:44] <chrisccoulson> that bug is fixed i think
[22:44] <chrisccoulson> cant remember the bug number off the top of my head
[22:44] <chrisccoulson> the initramfs hook didn't create the /etc/udev/rules.d folder
[22:46] <chrisccoulson> bug 314879
[22:46] <chrisccoulson> thats the one
[22:47] <RAOF> That one's beeen fixed, yeah.  There's actually another one, which'll have to do with cryptsetup.
[22:48] <chrisccoulson> thanks RAOF
[22:49] <rbrunhuber> Yes right I just installed all the newest updates a few minutes ago so this is another bug.
[22:56] <rbrunhuber> Wtf, if i search for linux-image-2.6.28-4-generic it says: No packages matching 'linux-image-2.6.28-4-generic' are published in Ubuntu.
[22:58] <RAOF> rbrunhuber: You're after cryptsetup.
[22:59] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: is it cryptsetup or initramfs(-tools)
[23:00] <RAOF> rbrunhuber: _Probably_ cryptsetup.
[23:01] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: if I unterstood you right cryptsetup is not included in initramfs
[23:01] <RAOF> Well, it is.  It's just not getting called correctly, it seems.
[23:01] <rbrunhuber> So what should be the bug summary?<
[23:02] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: cryptsetup not called in initram on linux-image-2.6.28-4-generic?
[23:03] <RAOF> cryptsetup for cryptroot not called in initramfs.
[23:03] <RAOF> The linux-image bit is almost certainly irrelevant.
[23:04] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: Not really as the installation of the image triggers the update which causes this mess.
[23:04] <RAOF> But you can trigger it in other ways.
[23:04] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: meaning the update of the initramfs
[23:05] <RAOF> Yeah.  Run "sudo update-initramfs -k all -u".  That'll break the other kernels for you :)
[23:05] <RAOF> Mention it in the description if you want, but I don't think you want it in the summary.
[23:05] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: I'll go for: cryptsetup for root on encrypted lvm not called in initramfs.
[23:05] <RAOF> Sounds good to me.
[23:08] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: What logs and other information should i provide?
[23:09] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: I think everything suggested on the bugreport screen is useless, because i do not run the flawed config. Am I right?
[23:10] <RAOF> apt-cache policy of cryptsetup, lvm2, watershed, and udev is likely to be interesting.
[23:11] <RAOF> Oh, and possibly initramfs-tools
[23:18] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: please have a look on bug 317297
[23:19] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: Maybe you can also confirm it.
[23:23] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: ping
[23:23] <RAOF> Doing so now.
[23:35] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: You lucky man being in sydney...
[23:35] <RAOF> It's too hot :P
[23:36] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: Tell me it is too hot we have up to -20 °C in germany...
[23:36] <RAOF> rbrunhuber: This has bugged me for a while... What's the compose sequence for °? :)
[23:37] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: what do you mean?
[23:37] <RAOF> How did you type the degrees symbol.
[23:38] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: On the german keyboard it is just left of the 1 key.
[23:38] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: So you press shift + "left of 1 key"
[23:39] <RAOF> Lucky you :)
[23:40] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: You have the degrees, we can at least type them ;-)
[23:42] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: maybe you can try alt+0176
[23:43]  * RAOF doesn't care _that_ much.
[23:43] <RAOF> :)
[23:47] <rbrunhuber> RAOF: Thanks for confirming my bugreport. Hope it gets fixed soon.
[23:51] <Hew> It's 39° here, I missed how hot it was for RAOF.