| fta | universe? | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | why not | 00:00 |
| fta | i don't know why it's not in there yet | 00:00 |
| asac | its the perfect place for that ;) | 00:00 |
| asac | now that it becomes more popular | 00:00 |
| fta | there's probably a reason | 00:00 |
| asac | fta: there is no sponsor/maintainer | 00:00 |
| asac | fta: ask jcastro | 00:00 |
| asac | ;) | 00:01 |
| fta | jcastro, ^^ | 00:01 |
| jcastro | fta: I usually don't push one unless upstream asks me to | 00:03 |
| jcastro | he doesn't really want it in universe until he gets it hooked up to the gnome keyring | 00:03 |
| jcastro | which he's working on currently | 00:03 |
| jcastro | fta: however, if you want to throw an update into your PPA I have no qualms copying them to the official PPA. :D | 00:04 |
| fta | jcastro, ok, i can do a rogue snapshot then | 00:04 |
| jcastro | fta: follow the versioning scheme that's in the gwibber ppa, let me know and I'll copy them over when yours are built | 00:04 |
| fta | i follows the version scheme so it integrates well | 00:04 |
| fta | yeah | 00:04 |
| fta | -s | 00:04 |
| jcastro | actually | 00:04 |
| jcastro | let me just give you access to the gwibber ppa | 00:04 |
| jcastro | so if I get hit by a truck you can update | 00:05 |
| fta | lol, I think i risk more than you do, i commute by bike everyday | 00:05 |
| fta | and in paris, drivers are crazy | 00:06 |
| jcastro | your lp username is "fta" right? | 00:06 |
| asac | obviously ;) | 00:06 |
| jcastro | well, I never assume lp names because there are so many ones | 00:06 |
| jcastro | and I've on many occasions assigned bugs to the wrong people, heh | 00:06 |
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/104608/ | 00:07 |
| jcastro | fta: ok you should be able to push to the gwibber ppa now | 00:07 |
| fta | asac, that's for your "is not a symbolic link" | 00:07 |
| jcastro | fta: I usually push to my personal ppa, announce on identi.ca for people to test it | 00:07 |
| jcastro | and then if I get good results I push it to the official ppa | 00:07 |
| asac | fta: do_remove = 1 is default ... scary | 00:08 |
| asac | but "is not a symbolic link" sets it to 0 | 00:08 |
| asac | so should be ok i hope | 00:08 |
| fta | jcastro, great, i'll experiment on my side 1st, i hate to push broken stuff, and now that ppa have stats, it's even worse | 00:09 |
| asac | ppa have stats? | 00:09 |
| asac | what kind of stats? | 00:09 |
| fta | PPA build status | 00:09 |
| fta | Total builds: 2781 | 00:09 |
| fta | Failed 305 | 00:09 |
| fta | Pending 2 | 00:09 |
| fta | Superseded 66 | 00:09 |
| fta | Succeeded 2408 | 00:09 |
| asac | ok | 00:09 |
| asac | thought download stats ;) | 00:10 |
| asac | for a moment | 00:10 |
| fta | no, i wish | 00:10 |
| fta | if only | 00:10 |
| fta | 11% of failed :( | 00:10 |
| fta | I push by 36 so it raises fast | 00:11 |
| asac | 36? | 00:11 |
| fta | asac, you cost me ~108 bad with your upstreamed patches | 00:12 |
| asac | you mean because i forgot to rename? | 00:12 |
| asac | in series? | 00:12 |
| fta | {xul/ff 3.1/3.2} {hardy,intrepid,jaunty} {i386,amd64,lpia} | 00:13 |
| fta | yes | 00:13 |
| asac | good ;) | 00:13 |
| asac | finally i found a purpose ;) | 00:13 |
| asac | i will try to do better in future ;) | 00:14 |
| fta | yes, please | 00:14 |
| fta | at least, push the full series | 00:14 |
| asac | did i push half series at some point ;)? | 00:14 |
| asac | fta: i think 10% isnt that bad ;) ... givent that moz central is burning more than half of the time ;) | 00:16 |
| fta | when you renamed a patch without updating the series, obviously | 00:16 |
| asac | http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/ | 00:16 |
| asac | fta: yes, but in that case just forgot th eseries ... didnt push "half" of it :) (just kidding because of "full") | 00:17 |
| fta | lol https://code.edge.launchpad.net/gwibber | 00:20 |
| fta | more contributors than us | 00:20 |
| asac | whats funny? | 00:21 |
| asac | ah | 00:21 |
| asac | we dont have an upstream tree | 00:21 |
| asac | its natural that you dont get that many ;) | 00:21 |
| asac | those are mostly topic branches | 00:21 |
| asac | but did they ever contribute anything? e.g. how many got merged at some point? | 00:22 |
| fta | how would I know | 00:24 |
| asac | launchpad auto detects that nowadays | 00:24 |
| asac | at least when you requested a merge | 00:25 |
| asac | if the merge is pushed the merge request gets auto flagged as "merged" | 00:25 |
| fta | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/trunk | 00:25 |
| asac | imo branches should be marked as such too | 00:25 |
| fta | the last two, maybe | 00:25 |
| asac | otherwise you end up with zillions of new ones | 00:25 |
| fta | jcastro, hm, how do you merge the two branches? manually? | 00:30 |
| fta | i see two .bzr in your last tarball | 00:30 |
| fta | too bad you don't have a debian dir in the packaging branch | 00:31 |
| asac | what kind of packaging branch doesnt hav a debian/dir at all? | 00:39 |
| fta | asac, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging | 00:39 |
| asac | fta: yes. thats a "debian" only branch | 00:40 |
| asac | fta: you can use it like ours | 00:40 |
| asac | just take the upstream branch | 00:40 |
| fta | i have it | 00:40 |
| asac | and use --merge --export-upstream=/path/to/upstream --export-upstream-revision=... | 00:40 |
| asac | on first build to get the orig | 00:41 |
| asac | then you can copy that for subsequent runs to tarballs | 00:41 |
| asac | and just use --merge | 00:41 |
| asac | ( bzr bd) | 00:41 |
| jcastro | fta: yeah when I first made it I failed at naming it properly | 00:42 |
| fta | ok, i jast packed the tarball myself, and used --merge | 00:42 |
| fta | jsut | 00:42 |
| fta | grrr | 00:42 |
| asac | branch should also get .bzr-builddeb/default.conf | 00:42 |
| asac | with revid:... and so on | 00:42 |
| asac | so you can fix the upstream revision for individual releases | 00:42 |
| asac | ok off to sleep | 00:44 |
| asac | cu | 00:44 |
| jcastro | what I do is when he says to do a release I go into my gwibber dir, bzr pull, then I bzr branch my packaging branch into debian/, then debuild | 00:44 |
| jcastro | This was my first ppa so I am totally open to whatever everyone else is doing | 00:45 |
| fta | we have a packaging branch like yours but with a debian/ dir | 00:46 |
| fta | so bzr bd --merge from the packaging branch works directly | 00:46 |
| jcastro | yeah | 00:46 |
| jcastro | I didn't know about this bd --merge | 00:46 |
| fta | 0.7~bzr120~intrepid~ppa0 looks like a native version to me | 00:47 |
| fta | what about 0.7~bzrXX-1~intrepid~ppaY instead? so upstream is 0.7~bzrXX and packaging is 1~intreprepid~ppaY | 00:49 |
| fta | 1 or 0ubuntu1, i don't mind | 00:49 |
| jcastro | what is the 1 for? | 00:49 |
| fta | 1st iteration of packaging | 00:49 |
| fta | debian syntax | 00:49 |
| jcastro | I thought that's what ppaX was for? | 00:50 |
| jcastro | sure, whatever you think is best | 00:50 |
| fta | ok | 00:50 |
| jcastro | I kind of just winged the version to what seemed to work | 00:50 |
| jcastro | I am not really wedded to anything as long as I know how to do it from then on | 00:50 |
| fta | feel free to reject my changes afterwards ;) | 00:50 |
| jcastro | Having someone who cares about updating it is worth changes to me. :D | 00:51 |
| fta | current snapshot seems broken | 00:58 |
| fta | it starts file, i open the about dialog, i can't close it | 00:58 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/104618/ | 00:58 |
| fta | -file+fine | 00:58 |
| fta | jcastro, ^^ | 01:00 |
| fta | jcastro, to update the package automatically: http://paste.ubuntu.com/104627/ (that's without the --export-upstream* from asac). | 01:32 |
| fta | "+" is fixed, not \ | 01:35 |
| fta | a get-orig-source rule would be nice | 01:37 |
| asac | fta: you dont like --export-upstream? | 11:35 |
| asac | bug 316452 becomes more interesting | 11:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 316452 in nss "[jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/316452 | 11:51 |
| asac | ldconfig is too smart for us ;) | 11:52 |
| fta | asac, it's not that i don't like --export-upstream, more that i never used it. should experiment 1st. | 13:44 |
| asac | ah | 13:53 |
| asac | thought you use bzr bd | 13:54 |
| asac | fta: --export-upstream isnt perfect .. if you are on a different system the same export can have different check-sum | 13:54 |
| asac | so its usually a one time operation | 13:54 |
| asac | so bzr bd -e --export-upstream... could do the trick | 13:54 |
| asac | for "just" export | 13:54 |
| asac | with default.conf you dont have to care at all | 13:56 |
| fta | i use bzr bd all the time, but without --export-upstream | 13:57 |
| asac | fta: so jaunty is + and hardy is ~ ;) | 14:11 |
| asac | not that bad ;) | 14:11 |
| asac | except that you have to bump veresion for jaunty upload to next ubuntu revision | 14:12 |
| asac | (if uploaded officially) | 14:12 |
| fta | my mistake, jcastro used intrepid as default. | 14:12 |
| fta | no, i can bump ftaX | 14:12 |
| asac | fta: yeah ... but usually we dont include personall suffixes in uploads to official archive | 14:13 |
| asac | not really an issue though ;) | 14:13 |
| fta | the naming in my ppa doesn't hurt the one in the gwibber ppa, i'm lower, i can use their naming when i push there | 14:13 |
| fta | i don't plan to copy, but to re-push | 14:14 |
| asac | fta: 0.7.3~bzr183-0ubuntu1~fta2 not fixed | 14:15 |
| asac | + | 14:15 |
| fta | the idea to use the ~fta sig in my ppa is to be able to identify my debs so it's clear in bugs and i can ask people to revert all my stuff if they complain too much | 14:15 |
| asac | fta: all fine ;) | 14:15 |
| asac | (fta suffix) | 14:16 |
| asac | i dont care ;) ... just wanted to point out and being picky ;) | 14:16 |
| asac | but the + isnt fixed for me :/ | 14:16 |
| fta | but jorge pushed in it's own ppa too, with the naming i provided in my pastebin yesterday | 14:16 |
| fta | its | 14:16 |
| fta | https://edge.launchpad.net/~jorge/+archive | 14:17 |
| asac | fta: is the current snapshot latest bzr? | 14:19 |
| fta | i think so | 14:19 |
| asac | 187 ;) | 14:19 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/trunk | 14:19 |
| fta | 4 hours ago... | 14:20 |
| fta | so it's not, but close | 14:20 |
| asac | yeah. | 14:20 |
| asac | wasnt really a complain ;) | 14:20 |
| asac | fta: bump ;) | 14:36 |
| asac | jk | 14:36 |
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/104851/ ?? | 14:49 |
| asac | fta: not sure why there is a difference | 14:50 |
| asac | the applications thing is for the start menu | 14:51 |
| fta | and why two ? | 14:51 |
| asac | the autostart thing is for autostart | 14:51 |
| fta | bzr-gtk: /etc/xdg/autostart/bzr-notify.desktop | 14:51 |
| fta | app-install-data: /usr/share/app-install/desktop/bzr-notify.desktop | 14:51 |
| asac | so nm-applet doesnt have a menu entry so its only in autostart | 14:51 |
| fta | i mean | 14:51 |
| fta | bzr-gtk: /usr/share/applications/bzr-notify.desktop | 14:51 |
| fta | app-install-data: /usr/share/app-install/desktop/bzr-notify.desktop | 14:51 |
| asac | fta: app-install-data is used for the add/remove ... dialog | 14:51 |
| fta | oh | 14:51 |
| asac | e.g. the apps listed there are available with image and so on before installing | 14:51 |
| fta | X-AppInstall-Popcon=318 sounds weird | 14:51 |
| asac | fta: yes, but makes sense. its the popularity info used to display in gnome-app-install | 14:52 |
| asac | based on popcon data | 14:52 |
| asac | http://popcon.ubuntu.com | 14:52 |
| fta | oh, lol, i thought they hardcoded their ranking | 14:52 |
| asac | yea its knd of hardcoded. just automatically updated | 14:54 |
| asac | and maintained outside the app ;) | 14:54 |
| asac | to prevent fraud | 14:54 |
| asac | jcastro: any clue why some messages from me dont show up on my personal page? | 15:06 |
| asac | (identi.ca) | 15:06 |
| fta | asac, jcastro, a bunch of fixes: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging | 15:19 |
| jcastro | fta: ok | 15:19 |
| jcastro | fta: I have some questions about that little script | 15:20 |
| fta | sure | 15:20 |
| jcastro | but they will have to wait until later | 15:20 |
| fta | ok | 15:20 |
| jcastro | actually I can do one now | 15:20 |
| jcastro | why the tarballs? | 15:20 |
| jcastro | I usually just bzr bd --split | 15:20 |
| fta | that's how it used to work with bd prior to --split, --export-upstream, etc.. old style i would say | 15:21 |
| jcastro | ah ok | 15:21 |
| fta | i can add a get-orig-source so none of this will matter | 15:22 |
| asac | fta: how about adding .bzr-builddeb/default.conf instaead= | 15:29 |
| fta | yeah, maybe it's time for me to look at this. pointer to a doc ? | 15:30 |
| jcastro | fta: in hindsight, could we perhaps rename packaging to debian so when we branch it in the gwibber dir it puts the debian directory in the right place? | 15:34 |
| jcastro | right now it spits out a packaging/debian/ | 15:34 |
| jcastro | which is kind of dumb | 15:34 |
| fta | can bd use a flat packaging dir now? | 15:35 |
| Jazzva | fta: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Bzr there is something there about .bzr-builddeb/default.conf | 15:37 |
| fta | thx, i'll have a look later today, i have to run now | 15:39 |
| asac | jcastro: really, look at bzr-builddeb/default.conf stuff ... in that way you just get the debian dir and run bzr bd -> done | 16:58 |
| asac | no hazzles ;) | 16:58 |
| asac | but fta now looks into it i gues | 16:58 |
| jcastro | asac: I am investigating it | 17:04 |
| jcastro | asac: I am slowly getting into the best practice | 17:04 |
| asac | jcastro: cool. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Bzr | 17:04 |
| asac | thats what we currently have for extensions | 17:04 |
| asac | look a bit down the page | 17:04 |
| asac | Configure .bzr-builddeb/default.conf to specify upstream branch revision ID and ff | 17:05 |
| jcastro | yep I noticed that earlier | 17:06 |
| asac | yeah ... wasnt sure if you saw Jazzva's post | 17:07 |
| fta | back | 17:30 |
| [reed] | asac: that your first time to use Hg? | 17:31 |
| [reed] | :) | 17:31 |
| fta | asac, it's not very user friendly, i mean, you have to track the rev id yourself, bd should provide a hook for a script | 17:31 |
| asac_ | reconnect | 17:32 |
| fta | asac_, <fta> asac, it's not very user friendly, i mean, you have to track the rev id yourself, bd should provide a hook for a script | 17:33 |
| asac_ | fta: what kind of script? | 17:34 |
| asac_ | for what purpose? | 17:34 |
| asac_ | finding the revid? | 17:34 |
| fta | something to get the upstream version and rev id | 17:35 |
| asac_ | what would be the improvement? | 17:36 |
| asac_ | wouldnt it just help to update the default.conf properly when doing a merge --upstream-merge ? | 17:36 |
| asac_ | fta: ? | 17:37 |
| asac_ | for me this sounds like the feature we want ;) | 17:37 |
| asac_ | maybe bzr bd-merge ;) | 17:37 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| fta | asac, really, i don't see the benefit. you still have to find all the info yourself, and it's no longer a packaging branch, it's a huge branch with upstream in it, so it's slow. | 18:07 |
| fta | and big | 18:08 |
| fta | and worse, it's manual | 18:08 |
| jcastro | fta: asac: how are you guys liking this denting for team-related work? | 18:24 |
| fta | jcastro, about what? .bzr-builddeb/default.conf? gwibber? | 18:28 |
| jcastro | fta: I mean just denting in general about mozilla-team stuff | 18:31 |
| jcastro | I am wondering if we should encourage other teams to do the same thing | 18:31 |
| jcastro | get more info out there to users, etc. | 18:31 |
| BUGabundo1 | fta asac ping | 19:00 |
| BUGabundo1 | fta do you remember that last week I mention I saw a segfault on the console when closing FF? | 19:01 |
| BUGabundo1 | well now, I see a popup several times a day | 19:01 |
| BUGabundo1 | also is there a way for 3.1 not block pages auto-refresh, and not show that anowing button that says Allow, but clicking it won't allow anything?? | 19:02 |
| === jetsaredim1 is now known as jetsaredim | ||
| asac | fta: manual? how is that? | 19:50 |
| asac | fta: i said: "wouldnt it just help to update the default.conf properly when doing a merge --upstream-merge ? | 19:51 |
| asac | = | 19:51 |
| asac | jcastro: i use #ubuntumozilla ... as and experiment | 19:57 |
| asac | jcastro: havent done the automated summary thing yet though | 19:57 |
| fta | jcastro, i'm still unsure about that microblogging thing, it's fun for sure but on the long run, 140 chars are too short to convey anything more than instant feeling or quick Q&A. and it's volatile. | 19:59 |
| BUGabundo1 | fta that's why I like jaiku | 20:00 |
| BUGabundo1 | 140 for the OP | 20:00 |
| BUGabundo1 | and unlimite for comments1 | 20:00 |
| fta | asac, from the ex in the wiki, i don't see any benefit; but maybe i missed something | 20:00 |
| asac | fta: you missed that the ex in wiki is just a first simple solution. there are ways to make things better; but its definitly a good way. and full-source target - even though huge - are usually better either, as they have everything you need at the same place | 20:07 |
| fta_ | it's a totally different work-flow | 20:08 |
| fta_ | it has its own advantages and drawbacks | 20:08 |
| asac | the workflow is: bzr branch ... work on package; bzr bd ... no hazzles; no thinking about upstream etc. | 20:09 |
| asac | but i see that there can be different opinions ;) | 20:10 |
| fta_ | the tarball thing is not ideal i agree, especially for tracking huge fast moving targets like moz trunk but here, that's two huge branches | 20:10 |
| fta_ | i would rather use just one | 20:10 |
| asac | but i used both extensively and full-source is nicer for me | 20:10 |
| fta_ | that's why i requested the doc, the wiki is a particular case | 20:12 |
| asac | 6 boxes burning in tinderbox ;) | 20:12 |
| asac | its not relevant for us anyway ;) ... at lesat until we can sync from hg to bzr | 20:12 |
| asac | otoh, once we move stuff to upstream thats ok i guess | 20:12 |
| asac | but i am not yet sure if we really should move everything there | 20:13 |
| asac | or improve upstream build to pull packaging from bzr ;) | 20:13 |
| fta_ | asac, read my answer to the chromium guys? | 20:15 |
| fta_ | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/f/fennec/ | 20:15 |
| asac | mail? | 20:15 |
| jcastro | fta: btw I made a debian branch instead of packaging, now you can branch right in the gwibber root and it will do what you expect | 20:16 |
| fta_ | asac, yes, mail | 20:16 |
| fta_ | https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/fennec/1.0~a2-0ubuntu1 | 20:16 |
| fta_ | how come the ftp only has 2 arches?? | 20:16 |
| fta_ | jcastro, ?? | 20:17 |
| asac | fta_: thats ok ... publishing thing i guess | 20:18 |
| jcastro | fta_: instead of a stupid "packaging" directory when you check out it just puts the debian directory there | 20:18 |
| asac | fta_: ah ... now i understand your question ;) | 20:18 |
| asac | fta_: the other archs are on ports.ubuntu.com | 20:18 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| asac | fta_: ? | 20:18 |
| asac | got that? | 20:18 |
| asac | 21:18 < asac> fta_: ah ... now i understand your question ;) | 20:18 |
| asac | 21:18 -!- fta [n=fta@ubuntu/member/fta] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] | 20:18 |
| fta | yes | 20:18 |
| asac | 21:18 < asac> fta_: the other archs are on ports.ubuntu.com | 20:19 |
| asac | k | 20:19 |
| asac | fta: i think usually only supported archs are on main ftp | 20:19 |
| asac | lpia is an exception | 20:19 |
| fta | when i reco, my old session takes ages to timeout :( | 20:19 |
| asac | not sure why it wasnt moved there | 20:19 |
| asac | armel will probably follow | 20:19 |
| asac | but maybe also an issue with mirrors and space | 20:19 |
| fta | armel in in ports | 20:20 |
| fta | is | 20:20 |
| asac | yes | 20:20 |
| asac | as i said | 20:20 |
| asac | armel is official i think ... same for lpia | 20:20 |
| asac | but both are stuck in ports | 20:20 |
| fta | i thought the debs were supposed to re-enter NEW but apparently not | 20:22 |
| asac | fta: reenter NEW? i think they were approved | 20:24 |
| asac | fta: you dont get mail if binaries end up in NEW | 20:25 |
| fta | the src was | 20:25 |
| asac | fta: binaries definitly too | 20:25 |
| asac | you just had luck that archive admins had an eager day ;) | 20:25 |
| fta | well, at least for xul 1.9.1, ff 3.1, it was in 2 steps | 20:25 |
| fta | i polled seb128, but i'm not sure who did it in the end | 20:25 |
| asac | fta: who cares as long as it happened ;) | 20:26 |
| fta | sure | 20:26 |
| fta | epiphany crashed | 20:30 |
| asac | fta: will you go for ext4? | 20:32 |
| asac | ;) | 20:32 |
| fta | tempting but not now. | 20:32 |
| asac | i wonder if i try with build partitions first | 20:32 |
| asac | scared about loosing my home | 20:32 |
| fta | I need to change my main HD. mine is too noisy, and too slow | 20:33 |
| fta | and too small | 20:33 |
| asac | that would be a good moment to reconsider fs ;) | 20:33 |
| asac | fta: you need to get two fast raptor disks | 20:33 |
| asac | use them in RAID for build-dir | 20:33 |
| asac | that rocks ;) and boosts builds by 50% at least | 20:34 |
| asac | striped | 20:34 |
| asac | and for home two 1TB ;) | 20:34 |
| asac | doesnt need to be that fast | 20:35 |
| asac | just massive storage | 20:35 |
| asac | so four new disks ;) | 20:35 |
| asac | (at least i would need that) | 20:35 |
| asac | and a new CPU :) | 20:35 |
| asac | and 16GB of mem ;) | 20:36 |
| asac | read: a new computer ;) | 20:36 |
| jcastro | asac: I got a 32gb ssd. :D | 20:36 |
| jcastro | so I put that as / and my normal disk as /home | 20:36 |
| jcastro | though I should put my build area on the ssd someplace | 20:36 |
| asac | jcastro: is ssd fast? | 20:36 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ dmesg | grep segfault | tr '[' ' ' | awk '{ print $2 }' | sort | uniq -c | 20:36 |
| fta | 1 evolution | 20:36 |
| fta | 60 firefox-3.2 | 20:36 |
| asac | jcastro: i wouldnt put / on it ... just /var/builddir | 20:36 |
| jcastro | asac: it's sick fast | 20:36 |
| asac | hmm | 20:37 |
| jcastro | my boot is like 15 seconds | 20:37 |
| asac | jcastro: can one stripe them even? | 20:37 |
| jcastro | and that was before people started optimizing boot for jaunty | 20:37 |
| jcastro | yep, they're normal sata drives as far as the pc is concerned | 20:37 |
| jcastro | that would be insanely expensive (but fast) | 20:37 |
| asac | hmm ... i dont ned fast boot ... just massive build performance | 20:37 |
| asac | at best for 4 builds at the same time ;) | 20:37 |
| asac | let me check what my dealer charges for those | 20:38 |
| fta | BUGabundo1, me too. i think apport changed or something | 20:38 |
| fta | gasp, too late | 20:38 |
| jcastro | asac: you want a samsung SLC SSD (which is the one I got) or any of the intel ones, the other ones suck | 20:38 |
| jcastro | asac: lots of new ones coming out this quarter though, so waiting is also an option. :D | 20:39 |
| asac | yeah ... head abou tthat | 20:41 |
| white | asac: xulrunner DSA released, waiting for Eric to upload iceweasel now | 20:41 |
| white | asac: thanks for all your work :) | 20:42 |
| asac | white: welcome too for helping out | 20:43 |
| fta | another ff3.2 crash on exit :( | 20:47 |
| asac | fta: isnt that the same segfault still? | 20:48 |
| fta | it is | 20:48 |
| asac | white: would you be interested to help out directly contributing to old branch security upstream? | 20:49 |
| fta | my 60+ crashes are when i click on urls, so remote sessions | 20:49 |
| asac | white: for instance, we lack folks that verify fixes for which we backport and commit patches | 20:49 |
| asac | fta: yeah. i will look into it at some point | 20:49 |
| asac | fta: could you report that upstream? | 20:50 |
| white | asac: well, i suppose I'll do future DSAs, but hope that other members of the sec team will take them as well. At the moment, I don't have the time to constantly check ice* code, but if issues arise, I'm happy to help :) | 20:56 |
| rzr | hi guys , do you know about palm's WebOS ? http://www.newlc.com/en/forum/palm-plateforms-also-gnulinux-based | 21:00 |
| fta | asac, mozilla bug 473629 | 21:03 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 473629 in General "crash on exit" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473629 | 21:03 |
| asac | fta: do you have libc-dbgsym installed? | 21:05 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/104971/ | 21:05 |
| fta | asac, ^^ | 21:08 |
| jcastro | asac: Is ap association speed after resume being real slow a NM problem or a driver problem? | 21:12 |
| asac | jcastro: its a scan thing i think | 21:16 |
| asac | jcastro: a reace | 21:16 |
| asac | race | 21:16 |
| asac | NM wakes up; wpasupp wakes up | 21:17 |
| asac | nm sends dbus scan but wpasupp isnt there yet | 21:17 |
| asac | fta: can you bump nspr and nss in ppa? | 21:27 |
| asac | (to include fix) | 21:27 |
| fta | I thought you pushed that to main !? | 21:29 |
| asac | fta: i mean for intrepid/hardy ;) | 21:33 |
| fta | ok | 21:34 |
| jcastro | asac: does that happen for everybody regardless of what driver they use then? | 21:34 |
| asac | fta: i have a intrepid sysstem where i likely can verify the upgrade issue because there are a bunch of stuff hanging | 21:34 |
| jcastro | asac: because for me it really sucks, it's easily over a minute | 21:34 |
| asac | jcastro: not known whether driver matters; if it matters, its just of a less/more fortunate timing; so its not a driver bug most likely | 21:35 |
| asac | jcastro: can you reproduce? | 21:35 |
| asac | for me its rather quick usually ... so ;) | 21:35 |
| jcastro | I will just give you my laptop during the sprint. :D | 21:36 |
| fta | [reed], i can't add checkin-needed for mozilla bug 460913 | 21:36 |
| asac | let me check something | 21:36 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460913 in Build Config "Installer shouldn't copy xulrunner files into Firefox install directory" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460913 | 21:36 |
| [reed] | why not? | 21:37 |
| [reed] | what happens? | 21:37 |
| fta | no such flag | 21:37 |
| fta | with my profile at least | 21:37 |
| [reed] | it's a keyword | 21:37 |
| [reed] | see at the top | 21:37 |
| [reed] | Keywords: ______________________ | 21:37 |
| [reed] | put checkin-needed there | 21:37 |
| fta | oh, it's not per-patch | 21:38 |
| fta | should I add wanted1.9.1 too ? I need it there | 21:39 |
| [reed] | if you want to, sure | 21:40 |
| [reed] | you should request approval1.9.1 on the attachment | 21:41 |
| asac | fta: once the patch has landed and applies to 1.9.1 you can ask for approval stating a good reason ;) | 21:41 |
| [reed] | once it lands on trunk | 21:41 |
| asac | heh | 21:41 |
| * asac slow typer ;) | 21:42 | |
| * asac should rest while eating ;) | 21:42 | |
| fta | asac, damn, Rejected: File nspr_4.7.3.orig.tar.gz already exists in PPA for Fabien Tassin, but uploaded version has different contents | 22:04 |
| fta | asac, where did you take the tarball you pushed? | 22:04 |
| fta | asac, some dbgsym debs are missing: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/libs/libselinux/ no 2.0.65-5 | 22:29 |
| fta | pff, it's not using debhelper at all | 22:42 |
| asac | fta: not sure. i think i used the one you had in ppa | 23:16 |
| asac | fta: hmm ... you think you can build libselinux with dbg? | 23:17 |
| fta | i tried, nada. i ended up forcing a nostrip build | 23:18 |
| asac | fta: you can do DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug nostrip" | 23:18 |
| asac | no? | 23:18 |
| asac | err | 23:18 |
| asac | noopt | 23:18 |
| asac | ok | 23:18 |
| asac | right | 23:18 |
| fta | i think it's either a jemalloc/malloc confusion, or a flash unloading issue | 23:25 |
| asac | thought it happens on remote client too | 23:33 |
| fta | it does | 23:36 |
| asac | means its flash unrelated | 23:50 |
| fta | "Approved merge ~asac/gwibber/bug317073-pasted-url-escaping" | 23:50 |
| fta | \o/ | 23:50 |
| asac | cool | 23:51 |
| asac | :) | 23:52 |
| asac | /usr/bin/ld: jsapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined hidden symbol `stdin' can not be used when making a shared object | 23:53 |
| asac | mozilla-central incremental build | 23:53 |
| asac | too bad | 23:53 |
| asac | cleaned just js/ ... lets hop | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!