=== khashayar is now known as khashayar_away === khashayar_away is now known as khashayar === khashayar is now known as khashayar_away [07:13] morning :-) [09:32] Morning everybody [09:34] hey davmor2! [09:54] morning schwuk [09:54] Hi ara [10:03] schwuk: Morning Dude [10:12] * ara reboots === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [10:15] davmor2: how goes it? [10:15] Fine thanks you === khashayar_away is now known as khashayar === corge is now known as fdd [11:47] is anyone else having issues with alternate jaunty? [12:38] hi. bug 316452 is fixed. so you can verify this in your upgrade tests once the bits are built and published. Thanks! [12:38] Launchpad bug 316452 in nss "[jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/316452 [14:11] major bug with yesterday daily installer [14:12] I choose a swap, plus the rest of the disc for / with ext4 [14:12] and the installer replaces that schema with a 8gibs / ext3 and the rest of the disc etx3 /home [14:14] BUGabundo_work: have you reported it¿ [14:14] ara: just found it! [14:14] trying to make a new install to test ext4 [14:14] can't proceed! [14:14] it won't let me choose my partition schema! [14:14] lol [14:15] it insists in lableling them aas ext3 and making one for /home [14:15] even when I just want one partition for the all disc and / [14:15] guess I'll need to go to the console! [14:20] ara: any tips on how to make the partitions and force the installer to accept them? [14:22] plus gparted still doesn't support ext4 [14:22] bah! [14:23] what was the command to make a partition with ext4? [14:23] BUGabundo_work: have you pinged cjwatson? he might now something more about it [14:23] BUGabundo_work: you can use cfdisk [14:24] or fdisk === khashayar is now known as khashayar_away [15:13] BUGabundo_work: mkfs.ext4 is probably what you want. [15:18] I have [15:19] sbeattie: I've discussed with him on #you-dev [15:19] *#u-dev [15:21] BUGabundo_work: I see. but if you manually want to set up an ext4 partition, use any of the partition managers to create it, and then mkfs.ext4 should let you partition it as ext4; though that probably will be difficult to get a / on ext4. [15:22] sbeattie: why? [15:22] why what? [15:22] why won't / run on ext4 ? [15:24] just the approach of manually formatting / as ext4 might be difficult, you'd be playing games underneath the installer and it might not like that. mkfs.ext4 will wipe out any existing data on the disk... though I don't know if there's a way to go from ext3 -> ext4 like there is for ext2 -> ext3 [15:25] the disk is to be formated! [15:28] right, but if you do it after the installer thinks its done formatting and has starting to write data to the partition, things will likely break. [15:29] s/starting/started/ === khashayar_away is now known as khashayar === mvo_ is now known as mvo === ara_ is now known as ara === khashayar is now known as khashayar_away === khashayar_away is now known as khashayar [17:45] davmor2: I'm testing a fix for the iso downloader, but testing it involves updating my cache of isos, so it'll be a few minutes. [17:45] sbeattie: to speed it up you could go for --only xubuntu it's the one causing the problem this time [17:46] stops on 64bit [17:46] live [17:46] yeah, I don't have a recent xubuntu image, so that'd be a slow testcase for me. [17:46] is it failing because the MD5SUMs doesn't exist? === asac_ is now known as asac [17:47] no 64 live failed to build so I don't know if the md5sum listed it but the image wasn't there or what [17:57] davmor2: okay, I think I have a fix in place. [17:58] rev 52 [17:58] sbeattie: so you couldn't recreate the original bug in bug 204133? [17:58] Launchpad bug 204133 in wubi/8.04 "wubi install unusable - Buffer I/O error on device loop0" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/204133 [17:58] no, I couldn't, but I didn't do an actual wubi install. [17:59] my last comment in the bug seems to indicate I couldn't either though [17:59] I was trying to set up a mock environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/wubi/8.04/+bug/204133/comments/21 [17:59] Launchpad bug 204133 in wubi/8.04 "wubi install unusable - Buffer I/O error on device loop0" [High,In progress] [17:59] Right, I saw that [18:00] I'll give it a go again [18:00] bdmurray: thanks. [18:00] Should I test using a 8.04.1 iso? [18:00] or just 8.04? [18:01] hum. dunno. maybe 8.04 would be a better starting point. [18:15] sbeattie: bdmurray: I can have a proper look at it tomorrow and speak with xivulon (ago) who writes it [18:21] I need to go I'll chat with you tomorrow [18:25] bdmurray: hi [18:25] davmor2 raised the flag on #204133 [18:26] xivulon: what do you mean? [18:27] 17:21] xivulon: can you have another look at https://launchpad.net/bugs/204133 [18:27] Launchpad bug 204133 in wubi/8.04 "wubi install unusable - Buffer I/O error on device loop0" [High,In progress] [18:28] was this in relation to 8.04.2? [18:28] xivulon: yes, I was going to try recreating it today [18:30] xivulon: yes, 8.04.2 release is coming up on the 22nd, and we're trying to clear out any outstanding SRUs for hardy in prep for that; ntfs-3g is one of them. [18:30] that bug lead to a few changes in several places and spread upon 2 versions [18:31] have to look at the status of 8.04.1 since I forgot what ended up being in there [18:31] xivulon: I guess we are looking for a good way to recreate the bug. === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [18:51] ok bdmurray, did some digging to refresh the memory [18:51] in short I do not think there is any reason to upgrade ntfs [18:52] because users cannot take advantage of that without an updated lupin package [18:52] which would be 0.22 (0.20 is in hardy update) [18:53] as for the testing (if it is required anyway), it is hard to reproduce faults due to dirty_flag [18:54] mostly you try to prove that the patch does not break things [18:55] which I had done at the time [18:55] but again I do not think that 1:1.2216-1ubuntu3 needs to be pushed further [18:57] I will ask slangasek to remove ubuntu3 from proposed [19:08] xivulon: thanks [19:14] np === khashayar is now known as khashayar_away === khashayar_away is now known as khashayar [22:05] sbeattie: I've been unable to recreate bug 204133 [22:05] Launchpad bug 204133 in wubi/8.04 "wubi install unusable - Buffer I/O error on device loop0" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/204133 [22:44] <_MMA_> Anyone test Studios AMD64 disk and have X *not* start w/nVidia? I'm burning norm Ubuntu now to see if it happens there also. Same drivers/kernel Should be the same. [22:52] <_MMA_> slangasek: Are the Ubuntu disks being respun? If so why? And should Studios? [22:53] _MMA_: Ubuntu disks are oversized until OOo toes the line. [22:53] <_MMA_> Ahh.. OK. Saw that. 790MB. [22:59] <_MMA_> stgrabber: Can a question (tickbox, whatever) be added to to the tracker to ask if the test was virtual or not? I've had successful tests virtually that failed on real HW and vice-versa. [23:45] <_MMA_> Im getting a black screen while testing Ubuntu/Studio AMD64. Is this known? [23:46] _MMA_: +1 here for xubuntu [23:47] <_MMA_> Oh Ouch. [23:47] <_MMA_> charlie-tca: nVidia GFX? [23:47] no, the tickbox [23:47] <_MMA_> Oh. hehe [23:48] * charlie-tca still learning to specify [23:51] <_MMA_> slangasek: Aside from the OO.o issue, if Ubuntu is respun for any tech reason, Studio should as well. I'm have no luck with AMD64 not matter the flavor ATM.