| clerum | is there anything futher I could do to help get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/254622 | 03:54 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot3 | Malone bug 254622 in linux "TCP uses wrong MTU/MSS size for IPv6" [Medium,Triaged] | 03:54 |
| clerum | moved along? | 03:54 |
| clerum | is there more information I could provide? | 03:54 |
| clerum | unfortunatly I have no clue where to start in fixing this...and java is my only language so I doubt I would be much help | 03:56 |
| apw | dtchen, hi there ... question about a quirk you are suggesting on a bug, about? | 09:42 |
| JesperHansen | This seems like the right channel to ask this | 12:45 |
| JesperHansen | Was wondering if there's an updated version of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CustomRestrictedModules#Modify%20debian/rules somewhere. abi_version doesn't exist in the enlisted file debian/rules | 12:45 |
| JesperHansen | Compared against linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27 | 12:47 |
| Kano | hi rtg ,did you read my mail about rt2860/2870? | 13:43 |
| Kano | rtg: the drivers are working, no patching needed, you can copy em over from 2.6.29 | 13:45 |
| Kano | just dont forget to add the firmware as well | 13:46 |
| rtg | Kano: I'' get to it later today. I just got back from 3 days off and have a bunch of emails. | 13:46 |
| Kano | you will see the 2 firmware links for it in the mail | 13:46 |
| apw | sconklin, hi, i did another change for the apport stuff, to send the stress log as well as the flag file. this is up for review now | 14:24 |
| sconklin | apw: I was just coming to those in my email for the morning | 14:25 |
| apw | matt's emails yes? | 14:26 |
| apw | sconklin, anyhow, just wanted you to know i had taken care of the strees.log part, so i think once all these changes hit the relevant packages we should be 'good' | 14:30 |
| JesperHansen | Was wondering if there's an updated version of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CustomRestrictedModules#Modify%20debian/rules somewhere. abi_version doesn't exist in the enlisted file debian/rules compared howto against linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27 | 14:34 |
| rtg | JesperHansen: Its in debian/rules.d/0-common-vars.mk | 14:36 |
| JesperHansen | rtg: thanks | 14:37 |
| JesperHansen | rtg: and abi_version has been renamed? Cant see its presence in there either | 14:38 |
| rtg | JesperHansen: Its called abinum. The LRM package structure changed quite a lot from Hardy to Intrepid. | 14:39 |
| JesperHansen | rtg: ye, I figured it was some old stuff I was trying to decipher | 14:40 |
| sconklin | apw: ack'd your patches for suspend/resume | 14:42 |
| apw | ahh thanks | 14:43 |
| sconklin | apw: git question - during a rebase of one branch onto another, which contains dozens of commits delta - I see a number of them apply, a few apply with three-way merge, it stops for me to manually merge a couple, and then at one point after I manually merge one and try to "git rebase --continue", I get the following from git: | 14:49 |
| sconklin | Applying Remove lpiacompat | 14:49 |
| sconklin | No changes - did you forget to use 'git add'? | 14:49 |
| sconklin | and git is in a state where it thinks there is more to rebase yet can't seem to apply any changes | 14:50 |
| apw | that means that the result of the merge was that there was no actual changes | 14:50 |
| sconklin | oh well, then a rebase --skip should do it, right? | 14:50 |
| apw | so either you forgot to git add the files which were changed, or the result was an unchanged files completely | 14:51 |
| apw | at that point a git diff HEAD should be null, and then a git rebase --skip is appropriate | 14:51 |
| sconklin | no, I definitely did an add, and status shows no uncommitted changes, so I'll just skip it, thanks | 14:52 |
| apw | that sounds appropriate | 14:52 |
| apw | i seem to remember something similar actually when i was doing my quick and dirty run at uds | 14:52 |
| sconklin | I had forgotten that it's possibly to end up with no actual changes, ~especially~ when manually editing in a failed merge. | 14:53 |
| apw | particularly for a patch called 'remove something' | 14:53 |
| sconklin | haha | 14:54 |
| apw | if it wasn't there, then removing it is already done, and the merge is null | 14:54 |
| sconklin | right. | 14:55 |
| apw | i actually think i had the same merge in the lpia tree i did | 14:55 |
| === smb_tp_ is now known as smb_tp | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| smb_tp | kirkland, while we are waiting for the meeting. Do you happen to know issues with vol_id in the encrypted installation of Jaunty? | 17:07 |
| kirkland | smb_tp: hmm, you should probably ask cjwatson about that | 17:08 |
| kirkland | smb_tp: there were some blockers breaking lvm+crypt | 17:08 |
| smb_tp | kirkland, Well ok. When I think of encryption, you come to my mind. ;-) | 17:08 |
| kirkland | smb_tp: :-) woohoo | 17:09 |
| smb_tp | :) | 17:09 |
| smb_tp | kirkland, Generally, if I got a partition that contains the encrypted volume. Do you know whether it should get a special partition ID? | 17:11 |
| kirkland | smb_tp: not necessarily ... i'm using encrypted LVM on my Intrepid laptop now, and my mount is just "/dev/mapper/vg0-lv0 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)" | 17:12 |
| kirkland | smb_tp: which is what I named it when I installed | 17:12 |
| smb_tp | kirkland, Ok, what I have here is vol_id on the initramfs being more stupid than the one in the rescue system (so it seems) | 17:14 |
| kirkland | smb_tp: hmm | 17:14 |
| smb_tp | The one from the rescue system shows the uid of it while the one from initramfs is confused because it thinks it might be swap or ecryptfs_LUKE | 17:15 |
| HDAPS | Hi, just wondering if there is anyway to confirm that Disk Head Parking is enabled? "hdaps-gl" shows only a static image (kernel 2.6.28 on 9.04) | 22:26 |
| Kano | rtg: you did not add the rtxxx drivers yet? what else do you need? i tested it already | 23:49 |
| rtg | Kano: I'm just now looking at it. | 23:49 |
| Kano | ok | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!