[00:00] <asac> fta: try http://pastebin.mozilla.org/610890
[00:00] <asac> do they add that symbol in their patches?
[00:01] <asac> if so it belongs in their patch
[00:01] <asac> otherwise it seems we dont build pyxpcom anymore in 1.9.2 or why dont we see it?
[00:02] <fta> asac, i used python instead of python/xpcom so it's also python/dom
 -DEB_MOZ_EXTENSIONS=xml-rpc,venkman,inspector,irc,gnomevfs,cview,tasks,reporter,python/xpcom
 +DEB_MOZ_EXTENSIONS=default
 commit #239
 Apr 08
[00:03] <fta> i now have default,python
[00:03] <asac> that works?
[00:03] <asac> good
[00:03] <asac> then add that patch from above too
[00:08] <fta> asac, http://svn.openkomodo.com/repos/openkomodo/trunk/mozilla/patches-new/MOZILLA_1_9_1/pydom_make.patch
[00:08] <fta> http://svn.openkomodo.com/repos/openkomodo/trunk/mozilla/patches-new/MOZILLA_1_9_1/pyxpcom_make.patch
[00:09] <asac> yeah. anyway. most likely both patches together fix the build and will allow us to deply example pyxpcom componmets
[00:09] <asac> patches seem to be mac love
[00:10] <fta> yep but openkomodo is for all 3 main arches
[00:10] <fta> strange they didn't need to patch for linux
[00:11] <asac> it should work .... except for the -rpath business
[00:12] <fta> still failing
[00:12] <fta> partial build
[00:12] <asac> fta: system_wrappers need to be updated
[00:12] <asac> fta: look where the dist/include/system_wrappers
[00:12] <asac> fta: look where the dist/include/system_wrappers*
[00:12] <asac> point to
[00:13] <asac> there should be a "eval.h" in both otherwise your partial build isnt enough
[00:13] <asac> probably done by running make in config/ and js/src/config/
[00:13] <fta> it's in there
[00:14] <asac> fta: libxul.so (and the pyxpcom.so) need to be recreated
[00:14] <asac> remove them manually
[00:14] <asac> make wont detect modified wrappers
[00:14] <asac> hmm
[00:15] <asac> maybe run a make clean in python/?
[00:15] <asac> did you try that?
[00:16] <fta> i sure did
[00:16]  * azazel  hopes that one day pyxpcom and pydom builds  (pyxpcomext) will be kept in sync with firefox;)
[00:18] <asac> azazel: once its avail as xul package that will happen automatically
[00:19] <azazel> mmm... as a xul package?
[00:19] <asac> fta: thats a bit odd then. if its really the same symbol missing recompiling all the .o and .so that include it should be enough
[00:20] <asac> azazel: like xulrunner-1.9-pyxpcom
[00:22] <asac> @time
[00:22] <asac> sorry connection feels shaky have to check whether i am still really on
[00:23] <azazel> asac: ?
[00:24] <asac> not sure what that ? means ;)
[00:26] <azazel> sorry, was for that "connection feels shaky... i am still really on", that i don't have uderstood... you are on:)
[00:27] <asac> yes, pinging bots gives me a quick answer to that
[00:27] <asac> irc client takes a while to timeout
[00:29] <fta> mozilla bug 472649
[00:33] <fta> asac, rebuilding from scratch
[00:34] <fta> and btw, it's 1.9.1, not trunk
[00:39] <fta> dtchen, http://paste.ubuntu.com/108057/ it aborts almost immediately now so it's worse :(
[01:36] <fta> asac, same with a full rebuild
[02:05] <asac> odd
[02:10] <asac> btw, the bugzilla bug error is not identical
[02:10] <asac> it doesnt have complains about "hidden" in it
[02:10] <asac> could be a missing -l
[02:10] <asac> or a bad log-cut ;)
[02:11] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/108081/ now
[02:12] <asac> yeah stiill the same
[02:13] <asac> fta: system_wrappers need to be -I in the compile lines
[02:16] <asac> anyway bedtime. will try to do a build without debug too here tomorrow .... lets see
[02:16] <asac> cu
[12:05] <asac> fta2: not sure why i thought it was eval.h, but it was marshal.h missing ;)
[12:05] <asac> fta2: http://paste.ubuntu.com/108202/
[12:06] <asac> also fixes application.ini substitution in a hacky fashion
[13:09] <fta2> asac, yep, i already figured out the application.ini part, the openkomodo guys too
[13:09] <asac> fta2: which patches make openkomodo infeasible to be built on top of plain xul?
[13:12] <fta2> i never tried without the patches, i wanted to build it like upstream recommends 1st, then improve; last time I tried to build it was 6 months ago but i ended up stuck with our system python
[14:15]  * asac spins comm-central 
[15:32]  * asac redownloading all gmail headers to tbird
[16:24] <steve555> Hi everyone.
[16:28] <fta2> asac, just got my 3G usb key. it's a Huawei E160E, rings a bell?
[16:35] <asac> yes
[16:35] <asac> fta2: is that one with storage included?
[16:37] <fta2> asac, there's a µSD slot but it's empty
[16:38] <asac> so doesnt work oob?
[16:38] <asac> what is µSD?
[16:38] <fta2> micro-sd
[16:39] <asac> ok ... if its empty it should work oob
[16:39] <fta2> my SIM card is at home so i can't test it right now
[16:39] <asac> ok ... let me know
[16:39] <asac> i think 160E should work
[16:40] <asac> iirc pitti has one
[16:41] <fta2> good
[17:09] <asac> fta2: i would suggest to test it before i upload the next NM crack to jaunty ;)
[17:09] <asac> e.g. NM with modemmanager
[17:10] <asac> that might cause regressions and would be great to know before it happens
[17:15] <steve555> Hi guts,I've just installed Firefox3.0 from deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/asac/ubuntu jaunty main universe.
[17:16] <asac> steve555: what are you trying to do? test security preview packages?
[17:16] <asac> thats what that archive was used for ... now thats somewhere else
[17:16] <asac> if you rather look for bleeding edge packages check out fta's PPA
[17:16] <steve555> Yes,I want to try and help out if I can.
[17:16] <asac> steve555: help on jaunty or on stable/security updates?
[17:16] <steve555> Can you give me the PPA address?
[17:17] <asac> security beta channel is https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive
[17:17] <steve555> Helping on Jaunty,as I have Kubuntu Jaunty Jackalope Alpha 3.
[17:17] <asac> bleeding edge trunk/head builds for firefox-3.1 3.2 are https://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive
[17:18] <asac> steve555: for ffox 3 its good enough to update everyday ... for 3.1 and 3.2 install the packages from fta
[17:18] <asac> and update every few days
[17:18] <asac> you can install them in parallel and use them in parallel
[17:19] <asac> steve555: one way to help is to install firefox-3.2 and help checking bugs against firefox-3.0 to see if they are still valid
[17:20] <asac> but tracking the bleeding edge packages and complaining about issues here is also a good thing if you dont have time for active bug work
[17:20] <asac> steve555: ^^
[17:21] <steve555> That is good to hear guys,I didn't know 3.2 is being tested,I have treid out 3.1 beta 2 in Windows,I'm going to try out 3.2 in a minute.I have to confess I have noe programming knowledge,but I have compiles source software.
[17:22] <asac> cool
[17:22] <asac> what we always want to hear about are regressions. e.g. stopped working on update ... or worksin ffox 3.0/3.1 but not in 3.2
[17:23] <asac> steve555: helping on bug triaging is also really much appreciated and definitly need lots of help there ;)
[17:23] <asac> there are so many crap bugs that the bug tracker isnt really usable atm
[17:23] <asac> steve555: for inexperienced folks we have https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/TriagersHandbook ... new and incomplete processing should be doable by anyone
[17:23] <steve555> I think I see,thanks for the link,I'll have a look at it in a minute.
[17:24] <asac> for instance going through the NEW bugs will give you work for weeks ;)
[17:24] <asac> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
[17:24] <asac> steve555: cool. just hang around here and ask if you have questions
[17:24]  * asac noted that somehow 300 new bugs got processed yesterday
[17:24] <asac> wow
[17:24] <asac> who did that ;)
[17:25] <asac> must have been a hero
[17:29] <steve555> The first is I can't seem to find Firefox 3.2.I've just put those two ppa's in synaptic
[17:40] <asac> steve555: firefox-3.2
[17:41] <asac> sudo apt-get install firefox-3.2 should work afaik
[17:41]  * asac looks
[17:41] <asac> should work
[17:41] <asac> the bits are there
[17:42] <asac> sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get install firefox-3.2
[17:42] <steve555> I'll give apt a try then.
[17:47] <steve555> Hi asac,I've just used apt,and it's got firefox-3.2 for me.
[17:50] <asac> ghood
[18:01] <steve555> Ok cool,I've looked at the hand book,and I tried to add the jaunty ppa's from this website:https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#head-c576e78d92cb3c959c271158b6ace98be835de83.But synaptic was complaning there's no public key.
[18:04] <asac> steve555: you mean the "ddebs"?
[18:04] <asac> those are just needed if you want to create backtraces
[18:04] <asac> actually for ffox 3.1 and ffox 3.2 its not needed as we have -dbg packages again
[18:04] <asac> fta2: ? those are available for 3.1 too, right?
[18:05] <steve555> Yeah that's what I was going to do,but I won't add them if I don't need them.
[18:05] <fta2> asac, yes
[18:06] <steve555> I've just been using firefox-3.2,and it hasn't crashed on yet.
[18:47] <asac> steve555: yeah. just meaning: if there is a bad apport backtrace you can take the coredump and use the -dbg package to produce a probably better one
[18:47] <asac> unfortunately 3.0 doesnt have -dbg yet ... but thats supposed to happen in jaunty
[18:54] <steve555> I have installed firefox-3.2-dbg,I hope apport doesn't complain it can't upload the backtrace to Launchpad like it has done on me for a couple of different packages.
[19:18] <asac> steve555: let us know
[19:18] <asac> steve555: the idea is to retrace stuff locally
[19:18] <asac> use apport-unpack on the .crash file to get the coredump
[19:19] <asac> then run sh /usr/lib/firefox-3.0*/run-mozilla.sh /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib/firefox-3.0*/firefox-bin /path/to/coredump ;)
[19:19] <asac> and then bt ful
[19:23] <steve555> Ok,thanks asac,I'll first run apport-qt to get the crashes again(I usaully get them at start-up),and use the instructions you gave me.
[19:24] <asac> steve555: the crash files that apport sees are in /var/crash
[19:24] <asac> you can just look in there
[19:24] <asac> and then use apport-unpack on the firefox ones to get the coredump locally
[19:25] <steve555> Ah thanks asac,I'll have a look there.
[19:26] <steve555> I've just looked in /var/crash asac,but there nothing for firefox in there.
[19:27] <asac> steve555: then you dont have a crash ;)
[19:27] <asac> dumped
[19:59] <steve555> I've just had my first firefox-3.2 crash,I just closed it and re-launched it via the k-menu.It comes up with this message:Firefox-3.2 is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox-3.2 process, or restart your system.
[20:00] <steve555> I just ran sudo killall firefox,but the message says:firefox: no process killed
[20:10] <[reed]> asac: mozilla bug 431011 -- do you have an idea, or do you know who would be good to ask that?
[20:13] <asac> [reed]: i will ask around
[20:13] <asac> [reed]: maybe there are hints in the commit of the comment?
[21:24] <fta> asac, i think http://paste.ubuntu.com/108202/ should be 3 patches, not one
[23:54] <fta> [reed], what is that Core -> Core Graveyard move for?
[23:54] <[reed]> fta: bugzilla reorg part 2
[23:55] <fta> is it useful to spam all users for such a cryptic move?