[00:21] <linuxman410>  how do you remove your old openpgp key if u got a new one
[00:26] <linuxman410>  how do you remove your old openpgp key if u got a new one i need to remove first key i have two of them
[00:33] <sectech> Not looking for support,  just a general question and are looking for a general answer.   Are there still Nvidia restricted drivers in Jaunty?
[00:33] <sectech> yes/no is all I am looking for
[00:34] <RAOF__> Yes.
[00:34] <sectech> Good enough
[00:34] <RAOF__> There are also shiny new open-source nouveau drivers, too.
[00:35] <sectech> Awesome....  Someone post to our newsgroup saying that there arn't any Nvidia restricted drivers in Jaunty, which made no sense so I thought I would verify
[00:35] <sectech> I just bought a 22 inch monitor and are now running dual monitor support lol...
[00:35] <RAOF__> nouveau is awesome for that :)
[00:35] <sectech> It probably WILL break when I upgrade.... but I can fix it
[00:35] <RAOF__> The nvidia restricted drivers still need an xorg.conf option, because they don't officially support our Xorg version.
[00:36] <sectech> Finally though some decent nvidia drivers that arn't closed source.
[00:36] <RAOF__> No (supported) 3d from nouveau, though, and no suspend/resume.
[00:36] <sectech> maybe now when I triage bugs and they deal with nvidia stuff I won't be thinking they are up the creek without the paddle...
[00:36] <RAOF__> But better 2d performance than nvidia, and nicer dual-head support.
[00:37] <sectech> meh, don't care about 3d that much.... I don't use it
[00:37] <sectech> Is there going to be a doc with all the changes when it comes to that?
[00:38] <sectech> it might get a little confusing trying to triage nvidia stuff if we don't really know what changed
[00:38] <RAOF__> Yeah, the release notes as normal.
[00:38] <sectech> It's a start I guess
[00:38] <RAOF__> Well, the nouveau drivers are in Universe; the only people using them will be those who want to test them.
[00:40] <sectech> yeah but I end up triaging the reports that come in... (I'm a member of bug-control), I'll talk to my clan about some kind of guideline to go by for those then
[00:42] <RAOF__> launchpad.net/nouveau has some guidelines for bug reports against nouveau; basically, they're worthless without an Xorg.0.log _and_ a dmesg log with an appropriate option.
[01:03] <FFForever> how do i get rythmbox-client?
[01:04] <andersk> By spelling it correctly (rhythmbox-client).
[01:05] <FFForever> yeah kinda figured that...
[01:11] <Naddiseo> OK, so how do I create a patch? (for gnome-panel)
[01:11] <Naddiseo> I spent the day creating a patch for bug #192009
[01:12] <Naddiseo> modifying gnome-panel's source*
[01:25] <Naddiseo> Nevermind, found the docs.
[03:13] <jrgp> ah
[03:13] <jrgp> I just upgraded to jaunty and keep getting this http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-932634.html
[03:13] <jrgp> I can get into failsafe terminal fine
[03:14] <jrgp> but when I try to login to normal gnome or fluxbox, I get the error in that post
[03:14] <jrgp> right, so...any ideas
[03:14] <jrgp> ?
[04:30] <lamalex> hey, I just selected ext4 as my fs, but it created an ext3 partition
[04:30] <lamalex> what gives
[05:21] <Tekno> hello
[05:21] <Tekno> my firefox is missing icon
[05:21] <Tekno> in firefox.desktop there is icon=firefox
[05:21] <Tekno> but icon file seems to be missing
[05:21] <Tekno> how to fix?
[05:29] <kab> Tekno, my firefox.desktop looks like this
[05:29] <kab> Exec=firefox %u
[05:29] <kab> Terminal=false
[05:29] <kab> X-MultipleArgs=false
[05:29] <kab> Type=Application
[05:29] <kab> Icon=firefox-3.0
[05:31] <Tekno> well i tried that firefox-3.0
[05:31] <Tekno> doesn work either
[05:31] <Tekno> doesnt
[06:20] <greatcaffeine> Does anyone happen to know why xorg.conf is completely blank in 9.04?
[06:21] <Tekno> because Xorg generates it itself when needed in startup
[06:22] <greatcaffeine> So are the configuration values stored anywhere?
[06:22] <Tekno> no
[06:22] <greatcaffeine> Interesting...  thanks for the info. :)
[06:22] <tritium> greatcaffeine: if you need to specify specific things, you *can* create one
[06:23] <Tekno> yea, it reads xorg.conf, but if some of configuration isn't there, that  will be generated
[06:25] <greatcaffeine> Well, what I was specifically trying to do was manually increase the amount of RAM allocated to my GMA 950.
[06:25] <greatcaffeine> I know there used to be a "videoram" option, but I'm not sure if it does anything.
[06:25] <greatcaffeine> And then I was surprised when xorg.conf was totally blank. :)
[06:26] <Tekno> :)
[06:26] <Tekno> but guess what
[06:27] <Tekno> i was very surprised when I found that also FSTAB was empty on my system
[06:27] <jrgp> 0_)
[06:27] <jrgp> for me /etc/fstab is not in any way empty
[06:28] <Tekno> yea, that's only empty if HAL does mounting
[06:28] <greatcaffeine> Yeah, my fstab has some junk in it.
[06:29] <jrgp> makes sense considering I've a slightly complex hd layout
[06:31] <greatcaffeine> Have you guys gotten sound to work in Jaunty?
[06:31] <jrgp> greatcaffeine, it does work
[06:31] <jrgp> it's just set very very low
[06:31] <jrgp> you've got to use alsamixer + a certain argument and raise it higher
[06:31] <greatcaffeine> hm
[06:32] <greatcaffeine> I've looked around in gnome-alsamixer and all of the levels look fine...  nothing is muted.
[06:32] <jrgp> I mean the command line version of alsamixer
[06:33] <jrgp> there's a certain switch which shows everything
[07:27] <pwnguin> ok, ive been wondering this for a while now, what determines when a package is held back?
[07:28] <pwnguin> for example deluge torrent
[07:28] <cwillu> pwnguin, depending on an old version of a package that you don't have, or that other packages need the newer versions of
[07:28] <pwnguin> even dist-upgrade won't touch it
[07:30] <cwillu> pwnguin, mark it for upgrade in synaptic, and see what packages it says will be removed (aptitude would tell you too)
[07:30] <pwnguin> cwillu: http://paste.ubuntu.com/109699/
[07:30] <pwnguin> i thouhgt dist-upgrade didn't care about removing packages
[07:31] <cwillu> pwnguin, obsolete packages
[07:32] <cwillu> it won't break the dependencies of stuff that is installed though
[07:32] <pwnguin> im confident it's fine
[07:32] <cwillu> it's just willing to remove packages in order to do it
[07:32] <cwillu> pwnguin, did update-manager offer to do a partial upgrade?
[07:32] <pwnguin> but im not sure why dist-upgrade won't do this
[07:32] <pwnguin> cwillu: nope
[07:33] <pwnguin> its grayed out in distribution updates
[07:33] <cwillu> pwnguin, I mean, it didn't pop up a dialog when you started it?
[07:33] <pwnguin> i dont run the gui tool often
[07:33] <pwnguin> bad habit i guess
[07:34] <cwillu> not terribly
[07:34] <cwillu> dist-upgrade in apt-get?
[07:34] <cwillu> or aptitude?
[07:34] <pwnguin> apt-get
[07:34] <cwillu> oh
[07:34] <pwnguin> i just tested aptitude and it seems willing to do it
[07:34] <cwillu> aptitude is recommended over apt-get these days iirc
[07:35] <mvo> pwnguin: from first glance it might be a glitch with the resolver in apt that you are hitting, that it things the new version is not that interessting because   deluge-torrent-common needs to be removed -o debug::pkgproblemresolver=true will tell you for your
[07:35] <cwillu> ...because of the dependency handling
[07:35] <pwnguin> i thought apt-get was just a frontend to aptitude for lamers like me these days
[07:35] <cwillu> apt-get is a frontend to dpkg
[07:35] <pwnguin> mvo: you got cut off
[07:35] <mvo> its really that apt-get and aptitude are frontends to libapt
[07:36] <mvo> but aptitude has some additional goodies :)
[07:36] <mvo> like a different resolver for dependency problems
[07:36] <pwnguin> alright
[07:37] <pwnguin> i just figured there was some circumstance that triggered these sorts of things
[07:37] <pwnguin> obviously dep resolution is complex, if it can be reduced to sudoku
[07:38] <cwillu> pwnguin, it can also be reduced to packing boxes into your car
[07:38] <cwillu> (as can sudoku, as a matter of fact)
[07:39] <pwnguin> well, if its just a failure and not some packaging heurestic i wasn't aware of, i feel better
[07:40] <mvo> we usually help the poor little resolver in apt by helping in cases like this with transitional pakcages and this like
[07:41]  * cwillu huggles banshee-1
[07:41] <cwillu> !info banshee-1
[07:41] <cwillu> !info banshee-1 intrepid
[07:41] <cwillu> nevermind that's a ppa transitional package...
[07:41] <pwnguin> heh
[07:47] <jrgp> banshee-1's only available in a special launchpad repository
[07:57] <cwillu> jrgp, yes, I believe I said that :p
[10:06] <naught101> is is currently impossible to akonadi and amarok together?
[10:06] <naught101> for me, akonadi depends on mysql-server-core-5.0, and amarok depends on mysql-server-5.1, which conflict..
[11:10] <cwillu> weird, my suspend/pm-utils/dbus/gnome-power-manager issues went away after unhooking the inhibit call, suspending, and then hooking it back up
[11:10] <cwillu> won't reproduce now
[11:10] <BUGabundo> cwillu: come again?
[11:11] <BUGabundo> I can't make my suspend work, but hibernate and resume works fine!
[11:11] <cwillu> BUGabundo, pm-suspend would work, but suspend through gnome-power-manager wouldn't work at all
[11:11] <BUGabundo> was about to report a bug with GPM
[11:11] <cwillu> would disconnect the network, and reconnect, but nothing else would happen
[11:11] <BUGabundo> 'cause it won't manage lcd bright after resume
[11:11] <cwillu> traced the execution into the same pm-suspend that I was running by hand:  it was getting there
[11:11] <cwillu> but getting caught in a inhibit hook
[11:12] <cwillu> was trying to figure out which one, and changed the inhibited function to always return no
[11:12] <cwillu> suspended from gnome, worked as expected
[11:12] <cwillu> reverted the change to inhibited()
[11:12] <cwillu> and... it still worked
[11:13]  * BUGabundo is lost!
[11:13] <cwillu> (inhibited is in /usr/lib/pm-utils/functions)
[11:13] <cwillu> no idea why it's working now, some state must have been changed in a file somewhere to make it start working again
[11:13] <cwillu> but it was persisting across reboots, dpkg -P remove's of pm-utils and related, etc
[11:13] <cwillu> but now it works...
[11:14] <cwillu> BUGabundo, toshiba satellite?
[11:14] <BUGabundo> naa
[11:14] <BUGabundo> OEM S37S
[11:14] <cwillu> they have a problem like that
[11:14] <BUGabundo> Asustek/ASI barebone
[11:14] <cwillu> BUGabundo, try closing the lid for 4-5 seconds (at least, long enough that the screen turns off)
[11:14] <cwillu> after a hibernate
[11:14] <cwillu> ...and resume
[11:15] <BUGabundo> humm
[11:15] <cwillu> alternatively, try killing gnome-power-manager and restarting it, see if that bring it back
[11:15] <BUGabundo> stupid question: Why?
[11:15] <cwillu> because it works around it for the toshiba, apparently :p
[11:15] <BUGabundo> what does closing the lid do that is so special?
[11:15] <cwillu> BUGabundo, triggers some acpi related something somewhere
[11:16] <BUGabundo> ahh
[11:16] <BUGabundo> ok
[11:16] <cwillu> heh
[11:16] <cwillu> don't make it sound like I said anything useful explanation-wise :p
[11:16] <cwillu> 'cause I didn't :p
[11:17] <cwillu> but never underestimate what sideeffects things can potentially have :p
[11:17]  * cwillu checks his hibernate
[11:17]  * cwillu 's hibernate works
[11:18] <cwillu> now, we just need to get that silly "gnome-power-manager polls xorg in a horrible way causing massive performance problems on intel" bug cleared away
[11:18] <BUGabundo> i0m using usw and it works great
[11:18] <cwillu> doesn't work on my lappy
[11:19] <BUGabundo> regular hibernate was also working well with old kernel
[11:19] <BUGabundo> haven't tested with -5
[11:19] <BUGabundo> but suspend (or better yet resume from suspend) is broken
[11:19] <BUGabundo> I also have an Nvidia, what can be the cause for the brekage
[11:19] <BUGabundo> or my eth card
[11:20] <BUGabundo> cwillu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/321415
[11:20] <cwillu> bug #307306
[11:21] <BUGabundo> cwillu: session??
[11:21] <BUGabundo> please explain?
[11:21] <BUGabundo> there were great changes in gnome session
[11:21] <cwillu> BUGabundo, not gnome-session, the session in general
[11:21] <BUGabundo> that will make it wait a few more secs until everything is really loaded
[11:21] <cwillu> no
[11:22] <BUGabundo> as oposed to before where stuff will be appearing at bits
[11:22] <cwillu> we're talking about pauses a couple times per second, mouse cursor jumping around, etc
[11:22] <cwillu> xorg's log shows that it's polling for edid information several times a second
[11:22] <BUGabundo> checkout my bootcharts
[11:23] <BUGabundo> and see if you can relate the events
[11:23] <BUGabundo> http://fileland.bugabundo.net/fotos/Linux/bootchart
[11:23] <cwillu> it's not a bootup
[11:23] <cwillu> it's not boot up at all
[11:23] <BUGabundo> I know
[11:23] <BUGabundo> but I record mine past 90 secs after login
[11:23] <BUGabundo> LOL
[11:23] <BUGabundo> so I cacth extra stuff
[11:23]  * BUGabundo thinks we are talking about diff stuff, right?
[11:24] <cwillu> boot charts aren't legible, won't show me anything above the 595px version, and you can't see anything
[11:24] <cwillu> BUGabundo, I'm not talking about gnome-session
[11:24] <cwillu> I'm talking about the Gnome Session
[11:24] <cwillu> i.e., you're logged into gnome
[11:25] <BUGabundo> so u fell the desktop experience is sluggish?
[11:25] <BUGabundo> is that right?
[11:25] <cwillu> it's clearly buggy
[11:25] <cwillu> the mouse cursor jumps back to where it was half a second ago, and then flashes back
[11:25] <cwillu> keystrokes aren't registered for several seconds
[11:25] <cwillu> xorg is pegging the cpu
[11:25] <cwillu> and killall -STOP gnome-power-manager makes it all better
[11:26] <BUGabundo> wait
[11:26] <BUGabundo> I'm confused
[11:26] <BUGabundo> is this during regular use, ie, all day
[11:26] <BUGabundo> or just after the inicial login
[11:26] <cwillu> this is from the moment the session starts
[11:26] <BUGabundo> for a few secs?
[11:27] <cwillu> and it never stops
[11:27] <BUGabundo> ahhh
[11:27] <BUGabundo> sure... I see that too...
[11:27] <BUGabundo> kinda looks like WinXP
[11:27] <BUGabundo> llololol
[11:27] <BUGabundo> afte login, stuff is still being loaded!
[11:27] <cwillu> no, it's not for a few seconds, it's for as many hours as I'm willing to let it run
[11:27] <BUGabundo> not me....
[11:27] <cwillu> tell you what, you reread _everything_ I just wrote, and then start talking to me again :p
[11:27] <BUGabundo> for me its about 20-30 secs after login
[11:27] <BUGabundo> then I have FULL crontrol
[11:28] <BUGabundo> that's why I presented you with my bootchatrs
[11:28] <BUGabundo> its visible there, those few extra sec where stuff is still beeing loaded
[11:28] <BUGabundo> and then it stops
[11:29] <cwillu> ...but I never said anything about boot up, or session start :p
[11:29] <BUGabundo> I may have miss understood
[11:29] <BUGabundo> so in your case GPM is not stopping
[11:29] <BUGabundo> after the inicial steps
[13:22] <bullgard4> Where can I find an account how NetworkManager has changed since hardy?
[13:23] <SiDi> bullgard4: look at intrepid's change notes, network-manager has changed a lot since then. I think you should look for the network-manager page on launchpad.net for full changelogs
[13:23] <SiDi> bullgard4: the next ubuntu is jaunty by the way :)
[13:24] <bullgard4> SiDi: Thank you for your advice.
[13:41] <bullgard4> SiDi: Full changelogs à la https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/network-manager/0.7~~svn20081018t105859-0ubuntu1.8.10.1 is not what I am looking for. I am rather interested in a higher-level overview. Can you advise one?
[13:41] <SiDi> bullgard4: if you're still under hardy, then i suggest you get on an intrepid/jaunty livecd :P
[13:42] <SiDi> They made a lot of changes, esp. for wireless connexions, but it's been a few months ago so i forgot about it
[13:42] <bullgard4> hm. Thank you for commenting.
[13:42] <SiDi> http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/intrepid/beta
[13:42] <SiDi> Here, they speak about it
[13:56] <bullgard4> SiDi: Thank you very much again for your help.
[13:56] <SiDi> bullgard4: you're welcome
[14:08] <shadowhywind> hay all, having an issue. When ever i have kaffiene try to open anything (avi,mkv,mp3) it closes. Nothing gets reported on the console
[15:17] <histo> upgrading to jaunty now
[15:17] <khalidmian> do u recommend installing jaunty ? after all im in intrepid ibex which is not a LTS
[15:18] <histo> khalidmian, not for your normal system
[15:18] <histo> I wouldn't install it on a machine that you need to have any reliability right now.
[15:19] <khalidmian> histo: when u say not for normal system - what does that mean?
[15:19] <histo> reliabilty
[15:19] <histo> If you can deal with it being broken and possibly having to reinstall due to some update that they are working on then yes install it. Otherwise stick witht he releases.
[15:20] <khalidmian> histo: i have installed kubuntu within windows and dont have any imp stuff in it = can uninstall kubuntu and reinstall it im assuming applies to jaunty too?
[15:20] <histo> correct
[15:21] <histo> Is there a reason you want to install the alpha version?
[15:21] <khalidmian> histo: ty ill give it a try wosrt come scenario ill revert to interpid ibex
[15:21] <khalidmian> histo: fun - ?
[15:21] <histo> Keep in mind if it aint broke don't fix it.
[15:21] <histo> well in that case then go ahead wth.
[15:22] <khalidmian> histo: ive uninstalled and reinstalled kubuntu quadra million times- a newbie so i just enjoy experimenting with it i guess
[15:23] <khalidmian> histo: which means bottom line im just a regular user not a developer or a wizz kid
[15:23] <histo> k.  See i use it as my only OS on some machines to installing jaunty on those wouldn't make sense. But I have a box that I just install this sort of thing on just to test and see if there are any bugs with my hardware.
[15:24] <histo> Also you can use virtualbox and create virtual machines if you wanted.
[15:24] <khalidmian> ill try it for now i only use kubuntu within windows so i see no harm
[15:24] <khalidmian> ty for suggestion though
[15:27] <khalidmian> histo:
[15:27] <khalidmian> kdesudo kate /etc/apt/sources.list
[15:27] <khalidmian> Error: "/var/tmp/kdecache-khalidmian" is owned by uid 1000 instead of uid 0.
[15:27] <khalidmian> Error: "/tmp/kde-khalidmian" is owned by uid 1000 instead of uid 0.
[15:27] <khalidmian> why on earth is it saying that
[15:31] <khalidmian> is there a way for me to upgarde to jaunty via sudo or adept?
[15:32] <fosco_> khalidmian: update-manager -d
[15:32] <maxb> Really really don't try to upgrade just by editing sources.list
[15:36] <khalidmian> fosco_: im on kubuntu this only installs synaptic
[15:37] <fosco_> don't know about adept, but you can install update-manager
[15:37] <khalidmian> bash: kdesu: command not found
[15:50] <charlie-tca> Okay, Did brasero break on Ubuntu today? Or, is it just Xubuntu that broke it with the updates?
[16:06] <maxb> charlie-tca: Define break? Upgrade problem? Already fixed in the archive.
[16:11] <charlie-tca> One package won't update, brasero won't burn cd's because of today's updates
[18:13] <DrHalan> hey i want to compile against librt on AMD64 but it complains about -fPIC not begin set
[18:14] <lamalex> has anyone done an ext4 install? I tried last night but even though I told the partioner ext4, it did ext3 anyway
[18:14] <kab> lamalex, I do
[18:14] <kab> :) /dev/sda2 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)
[18:15] <lamalex> hmm I wonder why mine REFUSED
[18:15] <lamalex> my whole partitioner was buggy
[18:15] <lamalex> couldn't edit partitions, had to delete then create new ones
[18:15] <lamalex> the iso checked out ok
[18:24] <histo> What up with th restrcited drivers tool?
[18:24] <histo> Its showing none availible for my card. nvidia?
[18:41] <kab> histo install your nvidia driver with synaptic or apt-get
[18:41] <Edico> hello
[18:44] <kab> hello
[18:48] <Edico> why ubuntu doesn't have default aliases configured for the shell?
[18:48] <Edico> it should have
[18:48] <Edico> It's so odd for a linux distribution to came default with desktop effects and without a minimum aliases set!
[18:49] <charlie-tca> Edico: There is normally a minumum set of alias in ~/.bashrc
[18:49] <lamalex> histo: i'm pretty sure nvidia is totally fsck'd right now
[18:50] <histo> lamalex, What is all this garbage about ignoreabi I'm trying to catch up
[18:50] <Edico> charlie-tca, I meen colors for user@host
[18:50] <lamalex> ignoreabi? no idea
[18:50] <histo> Its annoying the way ppl chat on launchpad
[18:51] <kab> histo, you can avoid this error in /etc/gdm/gd.conf
[18:51] <kab> this lines gdm.conf:621:command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0 -ignoreABI
[18:51] <kab> gdm.conf:636:command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0 -terminate -ignoreABI
[18:51] <kab> gdm.conf:650:command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0 -ignoreABI
[18:52] <histo> kab?
[18:52] <histo> I don't have any erros atm I'm running the nv driver
[18:52] <histo> Wondering about getting a proper driver installed though thats why i'm trying to catch up to the current state but it appears people are confused whether 180.22 fixes it or not.
[18:52] <lamalex> could try the neuveau drivers too
[18:52] <lamalex> lol I would hardly call the nvidia driver "proper"
[18:52] <kab> histo, ohh, if you want to run with the nvidia driver do that
[18:53] <histo> kab, and then what install the nvidia-glx-180 package?
[18:53] <kab> histo yes
[18:54] <kab> you install the nvidia-glx-180 and modify the /etc/gdm/gd.conf, then your can use this driver
[18:56] <histo> tryign it now
[18:56] <kab> histo, good luck!
[18:57] <histo> well still dl'ng
[19:05] <maxb> kab: I really don't think that's the recommended way to do it. /etc/gdm/gd.conf says: "This file should not be updated by hand" on the third line
[19:06] <maxb> I would suggest configuring it in /etc/X11/xorg.conf instead, since really it's nothing to do with gdm
[19:07] <kab> maxb, In xorg.conf don't function with me
[19:07] <maxb> works for me
[19:07] <maxb> Section "ServerFlags"  Option "IgnoreABI"  EndSection
[19:07] <kab> maxb, how  do you have the server flag section? or
[19:08] <kab> maxb, I will try this in my next reboot
[19:36] <blueyed> Can anybody help with or reproduce bug 309205 - using a MS Natural Ergonomic keyboard?
[19:51] <hanasaki> just installed alpha 3 and have the updates..installed on ext4... cfdisk says its a ext3 disk.. whatsup?
[19:52] <charlie-tca> It may be just an misprint yet?
[19:53] <blueyed> hanasaki: probably cfdisk isn't aware of the new format yet? Similar to programs seeing ext3 as ext2, if they don't recognize ext3.
[19:53]  * charlie-tca thinks that's what I tried to say, too
[19:53] <Volkodav> hanasaki, what does it say on boot ?
[20:34] <doedel> where can I read about the cool new features of 9.04?
[21:10] <tawmas> doedel: have you tried the release notes? http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/alpha3
[22:49] <Peddy> I'm running Jaunty alpha 3, how would I completely remove KDE and all KDE apps?
[22:50] <loic-m> Is there any plans to have thunderbird 3.0 in Jaunty or is it completely off?
[23:17] <Peddy> How would I enable the Nvidia drivers in Jaunty? I have nvidia-glx-180 and the kernel source installed.
[23:18] <andersk> Add these three lines to /etc/X11/xorg.conf: Section "ServerFlags", Option "IgnoreABI" "True", EndSection
[23:21] <Peddy> thanks andersk
[23:43] <x1250> Peddy, this should remove all kde apps: sudo aptitude purge kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdelibs5 kdelibs5-data libqtcore4
[23:50] <Tekno> hell
[23:51] <Tekno> how do I install Netbeans
[23:55] <Peddy> Tekno, type 'sudo apt-get install netbeans' into a terminal.
[23:56] <Peddy> Tekno, you might want to try #ubuntu in the future, this is a channel for discussing Ubuntu Jaunty (unreleased alpha).
[23:56] <Peddy> So you'll get more help there :)