=== CarlFK1 is now known as CarlFK [02:03] gnome bug 569411 [02:03] Gnome bug 569411 in Misc. "svn build dies in camel-local-private.c" [Critical,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569411 === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [04:06] hey i'm new here === joshthecoder is now known as joshthecoder_afk === tsharitt is now known as tim_sharitt === j is now known as jaes === LimCore_ is now known as LimCore === j is now known as jaes [06:05] good morning [06:12] mornin === ara_ is now known as ara [08:00] What should we do about public bugs that still have coredumps? === BugMaN1 is now known as BugMaN === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [09:06] How does "Ubuntu Sponsors for main" and "Ubuntu Sponsors for universe" work? Are those subsribers you yourself can add when you have debdiff-solution, like to get someones attention? Or do they subscribe themselves? [09:06] andol: you subscribe them [09:06] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProces [09:06] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess [09:06] sorry [09:08] basically it's the "reviewer team" [09:08] dholbach: thank you [09:09] andol: if you have any more specific questions about packaging, development, sponsoring and stuff feel free to stop by in #ubuntu-motu :) [09:10] dholbach: Will do [09:10] rock on! [09:20] good morning [09:20] need an advice [09:20] when my webcam is turned on by Flash in Firefox [09:20] it won't turn off again, until I restart the browser [09:20] is that a bug in FF, Flash, webcam driver? [09:53] mvo: Hi, maybe you could direct me to the proper place to file this? On intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc got kept back because apt didn't want to remove linux-doc-2.6.27 in favour of linux-doc-2.6.28. Do I file against linux. linux-meta, or update-manager? (If you know?) [09:54] maxb: update-manager for now, if you could attach the upgrade logs, I have a look [09:55] thanks [09:55] maxb: please give me the bugnumber when its there (apt.log is the one I'm mainly interessted in) === asac_ is now known as asac === LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox [14:04] ok, im starting a bit early on the hug day. i found a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/221698) that i can confirm. can i just do this, or is there something else i should do too? [14:04] Launchpad bug 221698 in compiz "Cannot resize window taller than screen." [Undecided,New] [14:10] AbtZ: yes please, also add a comment saying which version of Ubuntu / Compiz you're currently running [14:10] AbtZ: don't forget to edit the wiki and put your name on it [14:22] Guys I'm having an issue with jaunty. When I've had a major update and the restart icon appear on the panel if I click on it and select restart now it only logs out rather than reboots is anyone experiencing this? [14:32] occasionally, yes. Not reproducibly [14:52] hey guys is apport on the fritz I got a crash with bluez on jaunty and it's trying to send the bug to file:///ubuntu/+..... I'm guessing it should be something like https://launchpad.net/........ [14:53] Known bug, davmor2. bug 315966 [14:53] Launchpad bug 315966 in apport "Apport opens crash files as "file:///" urls (dup-of: 314263)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/315966 [14:53] Launchpad bug 314263 in gvfs "regression - URIs opened with firefox %u load as local files (file:///...)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/314263 [14:53] charlie-tca: ta :) [14:54] no problem. === joshthecoder_afk is now known as joshthecoder === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === warp10_ is now known as warp10 === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks === paul_ is now known as Elbrus [19:36] question about https://launchpad.net/bugs/312483 - the reporter is using thunderbird 3, but the bug is equally valid for thunderbird 2.0.0.19, so should this one be marked as Confirmed and the user informed that thunderbird 3 isn't provided by Ubuntu? [19:36] Launchpad bug 312483 in mozilla-thunderbird "Thunderbird's date format not changed easely" [Undecided,New] [19:37] jgoguen: that sounds pretty reasonable! [19:38] thanks mrooney :) [19:38] I would just explain that v3 isn't supported but you confirmed the bug in v2 [19:50] my question is, if I am triaging, should I try to see if the bug has already been fixed upstream (in a newer developmental version) or try to reproduce it ? [19:51] (which one should I do first) ? [19:51] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Confirming doesn't state which order I should do it in. [19:53] skorasaurus: Do whichever you think will be easier/quicker first :) [19:53] if it seems a valid bug, you can (and should) check upstream [19:53] jmarsden, k. thanks. [19:54] hggdh, i understand that, but sometimes it seems more work trying to reproduce it than finding out that it's already been fixed upstream. [19:54] so, it's on a case by case basis. [19:55] skorasaurus, yes. [19:55] btw, not only fixed, but also still open upstream [19:56] Bug 295127 seems to be getting no attention because it is marked Fix Released, but still requires an Intrepid SRU update. Is there anything I can do to get someone to look at it? [19:56] Launchpad bug 295127 in libpar-perl "libpar-perl won't install on intrepid due to libfile-temp-perl (>= 0.05) dependency" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/295127 [19:58] the MOTU SRU is already subscribed. [19:58] perhaps a nicer comment would do the trick [19:58] or a debdiff [19:58] I just added a debdiff. [19:59] good. Thanks [19:59] if it's fixed upstream, then should I confirm it then ? the howtotriage guide doesn't say anymore than just only to confirm it. (even though a fix has been released, upstream). [20:08] skorasaurus: Document in a comment that it is fixed upstream, in what version, and how you know that, and then confirm it. At least, that's what I would do. [20:38] hi [20:39] i've got a problem. i'm not sure it is a bug or not, but i hope you van help me :) [20:39] *can [20:40] shaman87: usually you can just ask your question [20:40] so the problem is, when i copy files to or from my external usb2 sata drive, my whole system gets slow, the load is seriously high, especially, when copying from that drive [20:40] the external drive is an 1TB samsung, with an 800 GB resierfs partition [20:40] and the rest is an ntfs partition [20:41] the problem is the same with the reiserfs and the ntfs [20:41] but with ntfs the load is even higher [20:41] so [20:41] can i do something about this? [20:42] i just switched to ubuntu from windows and i really find this issue annoying [20:42] and oh, i forgot, the copy speed is ok. (reiser: 18-20 MB/s, ntfs:14-18 MB/s) [20:43] * Elbrus doesn't know enough about this to help, but I guess it depends on what you really do, copy from one filesystem to an other? [20:44] my system disk is in ext3 [20:44] and the computer is a dell laptop [20:44] one of my friend said that the kernels usb driver can cause this [20:44] the best place to look is launchpad and see if somebody reported a similar bug report [20:45] maybe i can wait for a new kernel or the 9.04 ubuntu and see what happens? :D [20:45] ok [20:45] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ [20:46] if you really suspect a kernel driver, you might need to tweek somewhere (I know, it should work out of the box, but that just is not true sometimes) [20:47] yeah, but what to tweek? :) I google it, know :) [20:50] i tried searching on launchpad, but all i got is that file transers with usb are slow [20:50] and that isn't my problem :( [20:55] shaman87: you might test it with a Jaunty (9.04) live cd [20:57] hmmm [20:57] i will :) [20:59] and does that makes difference if i use another usb port? i just realised that i never tried it :) [21:00] shaman87, it might, if the ports are under different USB controllers [21:01] i will try it, thank you [21:23] and there is another thing: firefox very often crashes on sites with flash (like google analytics). I heard that this is the problem because the poor flash support of adobe [21:23] or can i help this somehow? [21:25] shaman87: if you use nspluginwrapper, then just flash crashes without taking firefox with it. this however can cause audio problems because nspluginwrapper needs ia32libs which conflicts with libasound2-plugins (i think that's the package) because they both provide a certain file [21:27] ok [21:28] and what is nspluginwrapper ? a FF extension? or just a package? And when flash crashes, how can i restart it? [21:29] its a wrapper for browser plugins so you can use 32bit plugins (like flash) on 64bit linux [21:31] it's installed on my system [21:32] you can use it to install flash in there, but ive never done it. i use open source flash [21:34] which package? [21:34] by the way i use ubuntu 8.10 64-bit version [21:35] my friend suggested that i should use the 32 bitt version and the problems would be gone [21:35] could that be true? [21:35] wait so then youre already using flash in nspluginwrapper? [21:35] or are you using the native 64bit flash 10 alpha? [21:35] nspluginwrapper is on my computer [21:35] but i never did anything with it [21:35] how did you install flash? [21:36] from firefox :S [21:36] ... [21:37] does that mean you clicked an apturl flashplugin-nonfree, an apturl adobe-flashplugin, or that you went to adobe.com? [21:37] sorry, im a beginner :) [21:37] i went to adobe.com [21:37] and did you get adobe flash 9 or 10? [21:39] 10 [21:39] do you realize that flash 10 is only in alpha state? [21:40] its not an ubuntu bug at all. it's adobe's bug, and it's because you're using software that's nowhere near done being written. [21:40] oooooh i didn't know that this is only alpha, sorry [21:41] you suggest that i should switch to flash 9? [21:41] well if you use flash 9 by installing the adobe-flashplugin or flashplugin-nonfree from the repos, i think itll install inside nspluginwrapper [21:41] and then it shouldnt be able to crash firefox [21:41] there is no flash 9 native for 64bit [21:42] okay, ill try that too after i finished sem things [21:42] thank you for helping me out [22:05] can anyone reproduce this vim bug? http://vim.pastey.net/107185 === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh