=== Moot2 is now known as MootBot === Moot2 is now known as MootBot === Moot2 is now known as MootBot [12:14] fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/112041/ <- upgraded to latest from your archive on intrepid [12:14] fta: and here a prb with miro: http://paste.ubuntu.com/112042/ seems to lack a conflicts [12:14] replaces [12:15] i think we should really prevent xul 1.9.1 to touch any xul 1.9 gre.d files [12:16] The following packages have unmet dependencies: miro: Depends: miro-data (>= 2.0~) but 1.2.6-0ubuntu1 is installed [15:43] asac, why do you think 1.9.1 even touches 1.9 files? [15:52] fta: not sure. thought you added the conffile cleanup stuff on 1.9.1 and later [15:53] fta: what happened on this upgrade is that my fresh gre for 1.9.0.6 was moved to a backup file [15:53] fta: if you explicitly only look for 1.9.1 then i have to check where this might have come from [15:54] i think you probably have two gre files for 1.9.0 [15:55] asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/112118/ [15:56] make it -1f [15:57] fta: no. thats not the issue [15:57] fta: the issue was really that there was no 1.9.0*.conf anymore [15:57] only .backup (or whatever extension we use) [15:57] well ... no 1.9.0.6.conf anymore ... i had to rename it ;) [15:58] this is fixed in 1.9.1 / 1.9.2, no in 1.9 [15:58] not [15:58] fta: yeah cool. can you commit the same fix to 1.9.head or give me a diff you used so i can backport? [16:02] asac, head still starts with "xulrunner-1.9 (1.9.0.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low" is that correct? [16:02] fta: hmm [16:03] http://paste.ubuntu.com/112126/ [16:03] fta: [16:03] should be pushed from what i can tell [16:03] let me double check [16:04] fta: now pushed. sorry. [16:04] not sure what i did ... but i think i unbound it [16:04] so i coudl do a topic branch for the major change request for libnotify [16:05] anyway rev375 is now there [16:05] ok out for barber [16:09] lol [16:13] asac, done, rev #376 [16:15] if you can also take the build-system stuff, it's #323..326 [16:23] please also consider #377 [17:30] fta: Here now ;) [17:30] hey! [17:30] always nice to have fresh blood here :) [17:30] fta: mv -v openkomodo-8991/*-source.tar.bz2 `echo openkomodo-8991/*-source.tar.bz2 | sed -e 's/-1.9.1-1.9.1/-1.9.1/'` [17:30] mv: `openkomodo-8991/mozilla-central-1.9.2~a1~hg20090131r24485-source.tar.bz2' and `openkomodo-8991/mozilla-central-1.9.2~a1~hg20090131r24485-source.tar.bz2' are the same file [17:31] I could force move it I guess :S [17:31] ?? hmm, not good, let me check [17:32] fta: It's rule 113 of debian/rules [17:32] s/rule/line/ [17:33] that's old stuff, my branch is not up-to-date, sorry, let me fix that [17:35] i can hand you my tarball for now, it's not the part that needs work [17:35] fta: sure [17:36] hold on, uploading it somewhere [17:39] 25%.. so slow [17:40] fta: Well, it's a pretty big tarball I assume, I think the svn directory was 150 meg with python tarballs included [17:40] i dropped all binaries from the tarball, we can't take them, forbidden [17:41] fta: I know, but it would still be pretty large, even without those tarballs [17:41] btw, where did you learn that i was working on that? [17:41] 50% [17:42] fta: I wanted to package it myself, since I use it and it's not in the repos yet. Then I found the needs-packaging bug on launchpad and saw you had worked on it [17:43] ok, good i added a comment there then :) [17:43] fta: Well seeing how much you have done, I don't think I would've succeeded :p [17:44] fta: Only packaged a couple smaller programs so far [17:44] the thing is i don't know much about python [17:44] fta: is mini 10 not yet avail with ubuntu preinstalled? [17:45] fta: It's my programming language of choice ;) [17:45] asac, it's not on sale at all here, afaik [17:45] oh [17:45] ok [17:45] fta: Going to eat now, I'll take a look at the tarball in 15 mins or so [17:45] its nice for sure ;) [17:45] if its really the thing i had in my hands during UDS from some oem folks ;) [17:45] piratenaapje, ok, 80% now [17:46] but i will check on that and let you know [17:47] asac, take pictures if you can. i'm worried about the weight, and the battery. the keyboard looks better than the 9 [17:48] yes. keyboard was the most annoying part of 9 [17:48] piratenaapje, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/openkomodo_5.1.0~a1~svn20090124r2851.orig.tar.gz [17:48] fta: the mini 9 isnt really heavy ... what weight do you expect? [17:49] less than 1kg [17:49] with battery? [17:49] yes, ideally with a small/light ac charger [17:49] 1.2kg top for everything [17:50] the ac charger is definitly light [17:50] at least for the mini 9 [17:57] but i update .head. if i bump versions in .ppa, i would have to work on more conflicts [17:58] fta: aptitude show mozilla-devscripts | grep -i version [17:58] Version: 0.10 [17:59] Perhaps the version in jaunty is higher? I'm running intrepid [17:59] i have 0.12~fta3. [17:59] asac, i should close m-d 0.12 now, it's mature enough, would you sponsor it? [17:59] fta: Jaunty has 0.11, should be high enough? [18:00] piratenaapje, i used new stuff in o-m. you need 0.12. I'm upstream for mozilla-devscripts btw ;) [18:01] o-k [18:01] why should i insist on typing o-m for openkomodo.. grrr [18:01] Ah alright [18:03] fta: sure [18:03] fta: just give me the sign for upload [18:04] do you need a bug in #lp? [18:14] fta: no. [18:14] fta: unless there is abug fixed of course ;) [18:15] asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/112175/ [18:16] fta: i would suggest to not use [ mozclient ] ... thats used for developers [18:17] i would use: [18:17] mozclient: [18:17] * poiint 1 [18:17] * point 2 [18:17] etc. [18:17] but well ;) [18:17] not really a real issue ;) [18:18] i don't think lp match "* [ foo ]" (with a star) [18:18] +es [18:18] lp doesnt match anything ;) [18:18] except emails [18:18] which they seem to parse everywhere [18:18] at least on the view side [18:19] in fact i think that for upstream development having a ChangeLog file in top level is better [18:19] as you can just add more things by date there [18:19] but well. whatever you do i am fine with it ;) ... [18:19] as long as it doesnt break backward compatibility [18:20] ;) [18:20] those changes dont look like they would. but you probably know better [18:21] it never hurt before [18:22] the changelog format? yes. thats fine. was just a comment ;) [18:23] * fta still fighting with the sasl2 crash [18:23] I want my SMTP AUTH fixed, i can't send emails! [18:24] so where is sysrq key? [18:24] grrr, it's the berkeley db 3.5 -> 3.6 :( [18:25] sysrq key? that's print screen for me [18:25] http://www2.bryceharrington.org:8080/drupal/zap [18:25] fta: ^^ [18:25] you probably already noticed that [18:26] * asac tries that key now [18:26] that's bullshit [18:26] ctrl+alt+bs != magic keys [18:26] the 1st kills X, the latter talks to the kernel directly [18:27] fta: yes. the idea is that alt+sysrq+k kills all processes assocaited with current VT [18:28] i use both, since what.. forever? and i need both but for different purposes [18:28] so the result is similar [18:28] and even more reliable because kernel does it [18:28] just tried it ... the magic key properly did kill x and gdm came back [18:28] it's a hammer to kill a fly [18:28] heh [18:29] fta: I feel rather silly, but I don't see what part in the rules file I should run next :S [18:29] fta: yeah. but for some reason they want to eliminate the ctrl+alt+backspace thing [18:29] probably because it gets hit by accident [18:29] piratenaapje, build it normally, dpkg-buildpackage (or the command you prefer, debuild, ...) [18:30] bzr bd ;) [18:30] yeah, that too. that's my preferred choice [18:30] what the hell [18:31] pidgin acting funny, brb [18:31] piratenaapje, build it normally, dpkg-buildpackage (or the command you prefer, debuild, ...) [18:31] bzr bd ;) [18:32] Very odd.. [18:32] ? [18:32] pidgin acting weird [18:33] fta: How do I actually build it now? [18:34] piratenaapje1, from the branch dir, put the tarball into ../tarballs and use bzr bd --merge (you need bzr-builddeb) [18:35] it will merge the sources with the debian dir from the branch, and work in ../build-area/ [18:35] asac, don't we have a tutorial for that on the wiki? [18:38] fta: Alright [19:12] fta: i think we have [19:14] fta: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Build/Bzr [19:14] not sure how up to date that is [19:14] probably deserves some love [19:14] house is love! [19:16] that would be a simplisitic view on love ... probably missing various corner cases and even main cases ;) [19:19] asac: http://home.nafallo.info/tmp/djrob+jan2609house192.mp3 <-- latest from my friendly djs :-) [19:20] downloading now [19:20] kewl :-) [19:29] Nafallo: nice nice [19:34] Hi! Hi asac [19:39] marcos_ast: hi. you need revpath binary [19:39] not sure where thats in ;) [19:39] let me check [19:39] ;) [19:39] dpkg -S revpath [19:39] xutils-dev: /usr/share/man/man1/revpath.1.gz [19:39] xutils-dev: /usr/bin/revpath [19:39] so maybe add that to wiki too [19:39] ;) [19:40] don't worry [19:40] for my defense: not my idea to use that ;) [19:40] but sometimes you are happy to get contributions and don't complain [19:42] dpkg: *revpath* not found [19:42] :O [19:42] marcos_ast: showed you the package name above [19:42] Nafallo: http://identi.ca/nafallo ... thats weak ;) [19:43] asac: tss. what would I use that for? :-P [19:43] Nafallo: writing dents ;) [19:43] sebner: are you using sunbird 0.9? [19:43] in jaunty [19:44] I don't undertand you :$ [19:44] revpath don't exist [19:44] marcos_ast: sigh [19:44] xutils-dev [19:44] asac: :-P [19:44] package name! [19:44] marcos_ast: ^^ [19:46] I installed xutils-dev [19:46] dpkg -S revpath works now [19:47] but not xutils-dev: /usr/share/man/man1/revpath.1.gz [19:47] bash: xutils-dev:: command not found [19:47] marcos_ast: well. i used dpkg -S to find the package where its in [19:47] ops [19:47] so nothing you should bother about [19:47] ;) [19:48] done [19:48] then [19:48] :P [19:48] marcos_ast: try again [19:48] gnomefreak: nope, why? [19:50] damnit === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [19:51] outside of lightning/tb3 compatibility issues i cant find anything on .ical remote calendars [19:54] well here is a new way to ask for help: [19:54] PS. Why doesn't Lightning have a more precise UA? (i.e., build date) [19:54] --> FU to mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird [19:56] ok its not just him it looks like alot of people are bitching at the devs for all kinds of reasons that really has nothing to do with them [19:56] asac: [19:56] marquinos@marquinos-laptop:~/Desktop/po2xpi/src$ ./runpo2xpi firefox en-USfirefox.xpi _firefox-ast.po [19:56] trying en-US.jar [19:56] entityname=brandDTD for line: [19:56] PWD=/tmp/po2xpi.JnPYJLqAjX/firefox/new [19:56] CMD=/home/marquinos/Desktop/po2xpi/src/po2xpi firefox ../_firefox-ast.po [19:57] /tmp/po2xpi.JnPYJLqAjX/firefox/new [19:57] MAKING START DIR: /home/marquinos/Desktop/po2xpi/src/firefox [19:57] PWD: /tmp/po2xpi.JnPYJLqAjX/firefox [19:57] marquinos@marquinos-laptop:~/Desktop/po2xpi/src$ [19:57] I think now works fine [19:57] :) [19:57] marcos_ast: good ;) [19:58] I have a folder [19:58] "firefox" with ast.po [19:58] sorry [19:58] with ast.xpi [19:58] drop & drag in firefox? [19:58] what must I do for check the translation? :P [20:02] marcos_ast: you can just install it as any extension [20:02] e.g. navigate to it on firefox and click [20:02] or just firefox /path/to/ast.xpi [20:02] fta: ping [20:04] fine [20:04] hmmmmm tb+sdpamassignin is fixed? [20:04] firefox appear in asturian language [20:04] :O [20:05] is this the test? [20:05] for the translation? [20:05] marcos_ast: you need the .xpi for xulrunner and the one for firefox [20:06] marcos_ast: then check every dialog and everything to see whether its translated ... or broken [20:06] ;) [20:06] I'm compiling xulrunner [20:06] works the runpo2xpi [20:06] marcos_ast: compiling? you mean crating .xpi [20:06] marcos_ast: yes. just use the en-US.xpi for xulrunner (also in the translation tarball) [20:07] :P [20:07] done [20:07] I'm testing... [20:08] All appears is fine :D [20:08] the search dialog appear in asturian [20:08] firefox browse the web fine [20:08] and appear in asturian too [20:08] :D [20:08] any test for you? :D [20:10] asac [20:10] :) [20:10] marcos_ast: preferences dialog [20:10] all tabs [20:10] all sub dialogs [20:11] there should be a bunch [20:12] ok [20:16] asac: did we reach EOL for tb-1.x [20:18] gnomefreak: why? [20:18] gnomefreak: its definitly EOL upstream [20:18] im seeing bugs on it [20:18] in ubuntu its still supported [20:18] ok [20:18] in dapper at least [20:18] i think gutsy has tbird 2 [20:19] tthis is post dapper as i recall but her eis report https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/259678 [20:19] Launchpad bug 259678 in mozilla-thunderbird "Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (20080724) thinks @ in a FTP URL means it's an Email address" [Undecided,Invalid] [20:19] im going through bugs i can always go back to it when im done [20:20] comment that bothered me was [20:20] Unfortunately, I don't run thunderbird on any of my machines that have a [20:20] newer version of Ubuntu on them so I don't know if it's an issue on [20:20] Ubuntu > 7.04 [20:21] gnomefreak: what are you using now? evo? [20:21] tb3 [20:21] heh [20:21] and sm if i ever get 2.0 built [20:21] so you are still running tbird ;) [20:21] gnomefreak: whats the prob with sm? [20:22] All is fine :D [20:22] included "about:robots" xD [20:22] any test more? :) [20:23] its fails to build using same source as fta repo had. spinning it on jaunty spit out a few rules file errors but didnt have a ton of time to look at it. Once i figure out the "hg" naming i will go for vewer upstream source [20:24] gnomefreak, if it's green in my ppa, it should build fine for you too, untouched [20:25] fta: i thought so too [20:25] Nafallo: finished listening :) ... #success [20:25] to update the source, you don't have to fight with hg, just run debian/rules get-orig-source [20:25] you need mozilla-devscripts, and of course mercurial [20:26] asac updated wiki page :) [20:26] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation [20:27] marcos_ast: 9. Copy here the firefox.po en-US_firefox.xpi. ? [20:27] isnt it firefox/en-US.xpi ? [20:27] or reference that its the xpi from 6. [20:28] yes [20:28] I will change it now [20:28] ;) [20:28] I like difference it :$ [20:29] fta: yeah i wish it was that easy. m-d kept spitting out errors with get-orig... and than i tried using debian_date and it fdailed as well and to use get-org you need a source name (DD or HG or what not) unless this is no longer needed. but as i recall changelog needs to have new source name for get-orig to get it [20:33] ok email is done ill run updates and attempt sm again [20:33] done [20:33] :) [20:34] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation [20:36] fta: give me a minute its gonna fail most likely due to git not being installed but it is [20:36] it's an old bug, which m-d do you have [20:36] ? [20:37] mozilla-devscripts: Installed: 0.12~fta3 Candidate: 0.12~fta3 [20:37] should be fine then [20:37] looks like its working now but a few minutes ill know [20:37] hi all [20:38] asac, are you here? [20:38] * gnomefreak smoke [20:41] sianis-devel: yeah [20:42] asac, could you review my patch for bug 305004 [20:42] Launchpad bug 305004 in ubufox "Untranslated fallback string" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/305004 [20:43] gnomefreak, all fine here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/112239/ [20:43] its running here now [20:45] sianis-devel: yes. let me think for a moment ;) [20:46] fta: looks like i was in wrong dir. [20:47] asac: :-) [20:48] sianis-devel: problem is that when you dont add a new string in .properties all other locales will break [20:48] e.g. all that dont have a translation yet [20:48] two solutions: a) add the english string everywhere [20:52] b) refactor and put plugin finder strings into a separate .properties [20:52] also add a prefix to the string name [20:53] e.g. ubufox.pluginWizard.description.notfound [20:53] i would suggest that we do b) [20:53] asac, it sounds good [20:54] hmm [20:54] sianis-devel: just create the prefix for now [20:54] thats ok then [20:54] i will do the refactoring when time comes [20:54] sianis-devel: also copy the english string to all other ubufox.properties [20:55] great, thank you! [20:56] sianis-devel: ok adde that to bug too [20:56] now off for a while [20:57] fta: are you here? [20:57] partly [20:57] piratenaapje1: if his nick is here just ask. he will answer when he sees the question [20:58] he didn't respond last ping :p [20:58] (or when tiem ;)) [20:58] make: *** No rule to make target `debian/-configure.stamp', needed by `debian/-build.stamp'. Stop. [20:58] piratenaapje1: because you didnt ask anything [20:59] answering on pings will train folks to send pings; and pings are bad as they require one more turnaround ;) [20:59] fta: ^^ [20:59] ah :S [20:59] one more cycle [20:59] also be patient [20:59] ;) [20:59] ok off for a while for real ;) [20:59] piratenaapje1, weird, did xul build? [21:01] fta: I guess not, what file should be created? [21:01] do you have the logs? if so, could you pastebin them? [21:01] asac, can you update the bug for the asturian language? :) [21:02] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/+bug/309312 [21:02] Launchpad bug 309312 in langpack-o-matic "make po2xpi aware of per-release whitelists (Was: Please update asturian translation)" [Undecided,In progress] [21:04] asac: incoming dcc :-) [21:07] fta: I reverted output to an output file yes, but the warnings still displayed in the terminal [21:07] fta: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/112250/ [21:09] so you have a fully built xul, fine [21:10] make: *** No rule to make target `debian/-configure.stamp', needed by `debian/-build.stamp'. Stop. <= this means $(DEB_APPNAME) is empty [21:10] hmm [21:11] lol, i dropped it somewhere [21:11] im gone for a bit lets see if this works [21:14] piratenaapje1, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/112254/ [21:14] sorry about that [21:14] fta: That's ok, thanks [21:16] i just updated the branch [21:17] fta: hmm ok, let me try that [21:17] piratenaapje1, ^^, with -nc, it should not rebuild everything, so it should fail during the next step, openkomodo-configure. that's where i stopped [21:17] fta: Cause it still gives me same error [21:17] show me [21:18] piratenaapje1, oops, DEBIAN_NAME, not DEB_NAME [21:18] i should take a break [21:20] ah ok [21:24] fta: Doesn't change anything : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/112263/ [21:25] piratenaapje1, did you change *all* DEB_APPNAME into DEBIAN_NAME ? [21:26] cat debian/rules | grep -i DEB_APPNAME gives no results, so I would say yes [21:29] fta: ^ [21:31] hm, i see [21:33] a last minute brain damage change when i 1st committed this. [21:34] piratenaapje1, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/112268/ [21:35] (fixed in the branch) [21:37] fta: Alright getting a different error now, taking a look ;) [21:40] fta: regmozbuild.Error: could not find a Mozilla build matching: mozApp=komodo, komodoVersion=5.1, mozObjDir=None, blessed=False, buildType=release [21:40] I guess that's what the problem is? [21:40] yep, that's where i stopped [21:41] a part of the problem is python [21:41] maybe even all of it [21:43] there's a bunch of functions there, enjoy the debugging :) [21:47] fta: Pretty ugly, pointers in python :s [21:47] it's not my own code ;) [21:48] piratenaapje1, i let you did into this, let me know if you find a way to complete the configure rule. [21:48] I really need a break. I'm going to watch a movie [21:50] fta: Might be too hard for me, but I'll try, have fun ;) [23:00] fta: Succes! It configures [23:03]