[00:44] <Bryan_Sierra> so I accidently removed a program in /usr/bin and now I can't remove it from apt-get because it's saying that the dependencies aren' tmet :o is there a way to just remove it manually? (Other than going directory by directory)
[00:45] <Bryan_Sierra> using apt-get*
=== Deeps_ is now known as Deeeps
[00:48] <Bryan_Sierra> Anyone know?
[00:58] <mdeslaur> Bryan_Sierra: try "apt-get --reinstall install PACKAGE"
[00:58] <kansan> how do i make this command happen if my ssh connection ever goes down?  ssh chef-client@chef-server
[01:02] <mdeslaur> kansan: you could use the "autossh" program
[01:02] <kansan> hwo do i set an enviormental variable
[01:08] <kansan> anyone familair with autossh program?  why doesnt it work when i do :  autossh -M 20000 ?
[01:34] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #323409 in cyrus-sasl2 (main) "sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323409
[01:48] <kansan> how do i make:  autossh chef-client@chef-server ... run as a background process?  (i'm invoking it from /etc/rc.local)
[02:12] <andol> kansan: autossh -f will put it in the background
[02:13] <kansan> andol, whne i do that it eemse to 2009/01/31 02:10:06 autossh[2639]: ssh exited with status 0; autossh exiting
[02:13] <kansan> its like it doesnt create a persistent background ssh connection
[02:13] <kansan> like i asked it to
[02:13] <kansan> however when i do :  audossh -M 20000 foo@server
[02:13] <kansan> it works fine
[02:13] <kansan> but i dont want to actually go there
[02:14] <kansan> it doesnt work either when i do autossh -M 20000 foo@server &
[02:14] <andol> kansan: when you do it manually, do you do it as the root user?
[02:14] <kansan> yes
[02:14] <kansan> i'm root when i invoke autossh
[02:14] <andol> kansan: Well, then I don't know
[02:15] <andol> kansan: This is the solution I used when I had to run autossh at system startup: http://www.andreasolsson.se/2008/08/27/etcinitdautossh_tunnelfoo/
[02:15] <andol> (init-script)
[02:15] <andol> Hmm, must be second of third time I mention it in this channel :)
[02:16] <kansan> where do i put it
[02:16] <andol> /etc/init.d/autossh.nameyouchoose
[02:19] <kansan> and to invoke it?
[02:22] <andol> kansan: To invoke it manualy: /etc/init.d/autossh.thename start
[02:22] <kansan> why do you need autossh.thename
[02:22] <kansan> why not just /etc/init.d/autossh
[02:22] <andol> kansan: Because then you would only be able to have one autossh run from /etc/init.d
[02:23] <kansan> isnt that what i awnt?
[02:24] <andol> kansan: In your case /etc/init.d/autossh would probably do fine. I was thinking more on a general level.
[02:24] <kansan> does all stuff in /etc/init.d get auto booted at startup?
[02:25] <andol> kansan: No, you have active it first
[02:25] <kansan> andol, how do i do that
[02:26] <andol> kansan: An easy way to manage those scripts on a server is to install the package sysvconfig
[02:27] <kansan> this doesnt work
[02:27] <kansan> i cant enable/disable anything in this way :(
[02:27] <kansan> hitting ok doesnt do anything
[02:29] <andol> kansan: 1) start sysvconfig, 2) Move to Enable/Disable, presss enter, 3) Move to the services you want to change, toggle using <space>, 4) When you done, tab to <OK> and press enter, 5)Select Finnished <enter>, 6) Quit <enter>
[02:30] <kansan> yes space works
[02:30] <kansan> i thought i should hit ok
[02:30] <kansan> i'm getting sleepy
[02:30] <kansan> and making mistakes ;p
[02:33] <andol> kansan: Go to bed then :) Actually that's direction I'm head towards. Feel free to ask follow-up questins tomorrow.
[03:22] <arrrghhh> how can i ensure my ubuntu server isn't trying to steal my printer from my virtual machine?  suddenly the printer isn't available in the VM... i stopped the cupsd service but that didn't help.  should i stop samba too?
[03:25] <arrrghhh> i can't umount a printer...
[04:10] <kansan> when i try:   autossh -i /root/.ssh/chef_tunnel -p 24000 -nNT -R 6400:localhost:4000 chef-client@foo.dyndns.org ... then: telnet localhost 6400; i get Connection Refused
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
[05:12] <cowmix> installing server off a USB key.. and its complaining about CDROM drivers after the keyboard setup.. is there a way around this?
[06:54] <rdw200169> cowmix, you can try setting the debconf level higher and skipping the detect cd rom step
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
=== erichammond1 is now known as erichammond
[09:23] <guybrush> Greetings! I've compiled a custom kernel (2.6.28.2) on U8.10, applied the apparmor patches in order, but Apparmor is not loading. Can anybody give me some advice?
[10:27] <orogor> hi , i did just enabled ipv6, but it seems that any site which allow to test if i am in ipv6 dont reconise me as connected via ipv6, could this be dues to the fact that ia m running iptables?
[10:29] <Nafallo> orogor: no. ipv6 uses ip6tables
[10:30] <orogor> Nafallo, i can t fiond such package
[10:31] <Nafallo> orogor: it's not a package. it's a binary.
[10:31] <orogor> huh ?
[10:31] <Nafallo> which ip6tables
[10:31] <orogor> returns nothing
[10:31] <Nafallo> not all binaries have their own packages.
[10:32] <Nafallo> have you got the package iptables installed?
[10:32] <orogor> yes
[10:33] <Nafallo> then you should have /sbin/ip6tables
[10:34] <orogor> haa, sorry
[10:34] <orogor> i typed which ip6table
[10:34] <orogor> forgot thes
[10:34] <orogor> forgot the s
[10:35] <orogor> inet6 addr: fe80::20c:76ff:fe4f:13e6/64
[10:36] <orogor> got an ipv6 adress with an fai with ipv6 support and no test site see me as a v6 host
[10:37] <orogor> hoo, the ruleset for ip6table is different than iptables
[11:02] <Tumie> Hi guys, i've got an problemm with my SSH connection with my server, i connect with the command "ssh <ip>" is this right ?
[11:09] <andol> Tumie: That sounds about right. You might also have to specify username if that differs from the host your connection from.
[11:18] <Tumie> andol: it is the same
[11:18] <Tumie> i'm not logged in on the server, is that a problem maybe ?
[11:24] <andol> Tumie: What is happening, and what do you expect to happen?
[11:25] <Tumie> I want to connect with my Server (that has Ubuntu Server 8.10 on  it),, from my desktop (Ubuntu Desktop 8.10) in the terminal..
[11:25] <Tumie> i only started the server up,, so i'm not logged in at the server itself..
[11:27] <andol> Yes, but what is the respons you get when you run the command: "ssh ip-number" from your desktop computer?
[11:30] <Tumie> WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED!
[11:30] <Tumie> and some other text
[11:30] <Tumie> IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
[11:32] <andol> Tumie: Reinstalled it rescently? Have you using ssh to connect to it before the reinstall?
[11:33] <Tumie> I reinstalled the whole server yesterday
[11:33] <andol> Tumie: That explains it :)
[11:33] <Tumie> what to do about it ? (and reinstalling doesn't get rid of all the old files :O )
[11:34] <andol> Tumie: When the server got reinstalled it also got new sshd-crypto-keys. That is why your desktop computer warns you, since it's a "new" computer on the old ip adress.
[11:34] <andol> Tumie: It should be ok to remove the offending line from your ~/.ssh/known_hosts
[11:35] <Tumie> their are 3 lines at that file..
[11:35] <Tumie> all highly coded
[11:36] <Tumie> i deleted all lines
[11:36] <Tumie> it is working now :D
[11:36] <Tumie> thanks :D
[11:37] <andol> you'r welcome
[11:37] <Tumie> hmmm.. webmin doesn't work,, yesterday it worked..
[11:37] <hads> !webmin
[11:37] <ubottu> webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system. See !ebox instead.
[11:38] <m4dm4n> !ebox
[11:38] <ubottu> ebox is a web-based GUI interface for administering a server. It is designed to work with Ubuntu/Debian style configuration management. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/eBox
[11:38] <Tumie> so, how do i delete webmin ?
[11:39] <Tumie> BRB
[12:32] <Tumie> How do i Fully delete Webmin ?
[12:32] <Nafallo> Tumie: by not installing it in the first place.
[12:32] <Tumie> I already installed it.... :|
[12:32] <Nafallo> sorry if that's a bit unhelpful, but that's probably the best way of doing it...
[12:33] <Tumie> and it is very annoying
[12:34] <Nafallo> yes. webmin have a tendancy to be just that...
[12:36] <Tumie> you are annoying..
[12:42] <jpds> !webmin | Tumie
[12:42] <ubottu> Tumie: webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system. See !ebox instead.
[12:42] <Tumie> jpds, i already know, that is the reason i want to delete it :)
[12:44] <Nafallo> ehrm. I'm annoying cause I'm saying that I'm not aware of a way to completely revert what failmin have done... oh well. sometimes the truth can be annoying, that shouldn't kill the messenger.
[12:49] <m4dm4n> Nafallo, your answer was anything but helpful.
[12:50] <m4dm4n> if we go back in time, it would've been a great suggestion, but unfortunately.. we can't
[12:51] <Nafallo> oh well. I'm stepping down from this discussion. I've already made my opinion clear, and that is that you can't revert webmin in any sane way.
[12:52] <Nafallo> sorry if that isn't considered helpful enough.
[12:53] <m4dm4n> "by not installing it in the first place" is what i can see... nothing about simply saying it cannot be done in a sane way.
[12:53] <m4dm4n> but.. your welcome.
[12:53] <Nafallo> logically that relates to the point I was trying to make :-)
[12:54] <m4dm4n> yes, in a sarcastic way.. it wasn't really needed.
[12:55] <Nafallo> wasn't mean in such a way, but text on IRC gets easily missinterpreted.
[12:55] <m4dm4n> nevermind now though.
[12:55] <Nafallo> agreed :-)
[12:57] <mc68040> hi all, i need to setup a 8.04 lts server. how can i ensure to install/use only packages with support until 2013?
[12:57] <ivoks> use only main repository
[12:58] <mc68040> ivoks: i think in main are the desktop packages too. they are only supported until 2011
[12:58] <ivoks> mc68040: don't use X librariers and you are fine
[12:59] <ivoks> mc68040: basicaly, packages in main which don't require desktop, are supported for 5 years
[13:00] <ivoks> does anyone know is it possible to mirror ports.ubuntu.com over rsync?
[13:01] <mc68040> ivoks: ok, i assume thats true for hardy-security and hardy-updates too?
[13:02] <ivoks> mc68040: well, only hardy-security and hardy-updates get changes
[13:02] <ivoks> mc68040: no new packages are released in 'default' repository
[13:03] <mc68040> ivoks: ups, you are right, i should think a bit before
[13:06] <Nafallo> ivoks: tried rsync ports.ubuntu.com:: ?
[13:06] <ivoks> Nafallo: i figured it out :)
[13:06] <ivoks> 14:04 < ivoks> bah, just ignore me :)
[13:06] <Nafallo> :-)
[13:06] <ivoks> on #ubuntu-mirrors
[13:06] <Nafallo> oh.
[13:06] <Nafallo> damn cross-talker :-P
[13:06] <ivoks> :)
[13:09] <mc68040> ivoks: i would prefer a better way to ensure to use only packages with support until 2013, but thx for your help
[13:09] <ivoks> mc68040: afaik, there's no better way
[13:09] <ivoks> i guess adding aditional filed to debian/control could help
[13:10] <mc68040> lol, had just the same idea :-)
[13:11] <mc68040> or to split hardy into hardy-server and hardy-desktop...
[13:11] <ivoks> and where would you put bash?
[13:11] <ivoks> or udev, upstart, or... :)
[13:12] <mc68040> in both of course
[13:13] <ivoks> so, bash, supported for 5 years would be in hardy-desktop
[13:13] <ivoks> but hardy-desktop is supported for 3 years
[13:13] <ivoks> er...? :)
[13:14] <mc68040> why not, nobody says that support on desktop must end 2011
[13:14] <ivoks> well, it won't be that bad..
[13:14] <ivoks> it ends in 2011
[13:14] <ivoks> but in 2011 hardy-desktop could be removed
[13:14] <ivoks> and that's it
[13:15] <ivoks> but hardy-desktop-updates doesn't sound quite good
[13:16] <mc68040> hmmm, so dont split but setup an additional hardy-server, hardy-server-updates and hardy-server-security?
[13:18] <ivoks> that's not that easy as it sounds
[13:19] <orogor> Nafallo, got ipv6 fully working , only issue seems to be that ip6tables on ubuntu doesn t like ulog
[13:20] <mc68040> ivoks: why not? building Pacckage files from special package lists shouldnt be so difficult
[13:20] <ivoks> mc68040: you are talking with a wrong person
[13:21] <ivoks> mc68040: you should raise this quetions on ubuntu-server mailing list
[13:21] <ivoks> i don't decide how archives are going to be organized; i just mirror them :D
[13:21] <mc68040> i think ill do :-)
[13:21] <ivoks> mc68040: for political point of view
[13:22] <ivoks> canonical isn't the only company providing support for ubuntu
[13:22] <ivoks> so, enforcing one companys 'rules' on ubuntu's archives doesn't sound quite fair
[13:22] <ivoks> having additional filed in debian/control sounds much better
[13:23] <ivoks> X-Supported by: Canonical 5 years, XYZ 10 years
[13:23] <ivoks> or something like that
[13:23] <ivoks> not that i have something against canonical :D
[13:24] <Nafallo> orogor: kewl
[13:24] <mc68040> hmmm, i think we want the same - even other companys will have an advantage if they could distinct the packages
[13:25] <ivoks> for example, i watch over hylafax, since lots of my clients use it
[13:25] <ivoks> it isn't supported by canonical
[13:25] <ivoks> but my clients get regullar fixes, since that's software they really care about
[13:27] <mc68040> you are right, there will always be packages that wont be supported by canonical
[13:27] <ivoks> if we could achive that interested groups maintain package, a not core-dev and motus, then, i think, we could achive better quality of packages and even could set up 'supported' queues
[13:27] <ivoks> s/ a / and /
[13:28] <ivoks> whith core-dev having fully access to everything
[13:28] <mc68040> i just dont want to minimize work, why should i watch a package if its still supported by someone else?
[13:28] <ivoks> and motu to all stuf universe
[13:29] <mc68040> lol -"dont"
[13:29] <ivoks> you may have interest in pushing some changes
[13:30] <mc68040> yes, thats what i want
[13:30] <ivoks> common good is mixed of all individual interest
[13:30] <ivoks> if that's correct word in english :)
[13:30] <mc68040> but i need a solid, well supported base which i dont want to take care of
[13:31] <ivoks> mc68040: 14:28 < ivoks> whith core-dev having fully access to everything
[13:31] <ivoks> with
[13:31] <ivoks> launch time... take care
[13:31] <mc68040> ok, bye
[14:02] <nomingzi> i have install a software (.pl) from terminal, and this software has it own services running. I would like to know how to check if the services are running fine.
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
[14:19] <shally87> hi
[14:19] <shally87> I need help on how to make my LAMP server run a live website
[14:21] <shally87> I´m noob here.. I just installed LAMP server with Samba and webmin to run on my pc
[14:21] <Deeeps> !webmin | shally87
[14:21] <ubottu> shally87: webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system. See !ebox instead.
[14:21] <shally87> !ebox
[14:21] <ubottu> ebox is a web-based GUI interface for administering a server. It is designed to work with Ubuntu/Debian style configuration management. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/eBox
[14:22] <shally87> then i have to uninstalled webmin right..
[14:22] <shally87> I look around for the ebox..
[14:22] <Deeeps> uh huh
[14:22] <shally87> thanks deeps
[14:22] <Deeeps> np
[14:23] <shally87> i met with this
[14:23] <shally87> WARNING: the eBox package released with Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) is broken and cannot be installed. See bug #255368 for information and unsupported workarounds.
[14:23] <uvirtbot`> Launchpad bug 255368 in ebox "ebox: Depends: libapache-authcookie-perl but it is not installable " [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/255368
[14:24] <shally87> so what am i going to do?
[14:24] <shally87> do i need to install the 8.04 hardy?
[14:24] <Deeeps> either use one of the unsupported workarounds as described in the bug report, or switch to hardy, or wait for jaunty, or use webmin
[14:24] <shally87> hmm..
[14:25] <shally87> i guess i use webmin for now..
[14:25] <shally87> any manual for webmin on how to get started?
[14:25] <Deeeps> no idea i'm afraid
[14:25] <Nafallo> shally87: webmin is not really supported in this channel no. rather strongly discouraged.
[14:26] <shally87> ok
[14:26] <shally87> like that, then I have to change to hardy
[14:27] <shally87> thanks for the help deeeps, nafallo
[15:09] <barisha> i need help with exim4!
[15:13] <dayo__> barisha: if they can't help u here, also check #exim
[15:13] <dayo__> oops
[15:36] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #323601 in likewise-open (main) "Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323601
[15:39] <axisys> anyone here installed ubuntu on niagra chip ?
[15:40] <axisys> for me it bombs out during disk detect phase http://pastebin.com/d2f76a5fd
[16:05] <orudie> hi! how can install this ? lenny version of libc6 (2.7.18)
[16:29] <orudie> hi, really need help on this, I need to make sure that i have lenny version of libc6 (2.7.18)
[16:31] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #323627 in apache2 (main) "apache2 has ugly icons" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323627
[16:31] <orudie> anyone ?
[16:51] <orudie> please....
[16:51] <orudie> hi, really need help on this, I need to make sure that i have lenny version of libc6 (2.7.18)
[17:49] <orudie> hi, really need help on this, I need to make sure that i have lenny version of libc6 (2.7.18)
[17:49] <syncrondi> sry, I'm not sure how
[18:01] <ScottK> orudie: If you want the lenny version of libc6, you pretty well need to run lenny.
[18:01] <ScottK> Swapping arbitrary versions of libc6 out from under the rest of the system is not a recipe for happiness.
[19:26] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #323681 in openldap (main) "package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.11-0ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: package libldap-2.4-2 is already installed and configured" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323681
[21:14] <shadowhywind> hay all I am running an ubuntu server, and trying to connect a 1.3TB ext3 partition (USB) everytime i try to mount, It freezes the console. is there any issues with the size of the partition?
[22:44] <oomkiller> anyone familiar with the ufw syntax in before.rules to tell me how to forward a port?
[22:44] <oomkiller> i have masquerading setup, but i can't figure out how to forward a port
[22:48] <rdw200169> oomkiller, using ufw, right?
[22:49] <oomkiller> yes
[22:49] <rdw200169> hmm... i know how to do it with iptables
[22:49] <oomkiller> well its essentially the same thing
[22:49] <rdw200169> ufw is an abstraction layer on top of iptables
[22:49] <rdw200169> ah, so you know
[22:50] <oomkiller> yeah, i've read the wiki pages, just can't get a straightforward example for a port forward
[22:50] <oomkiller> basically i think i need to -A ufw-before-forward ...
[22:50] <oomkiller> but i don't know what goes after that
[22:50] <rdw200169> well, good luck; i'm not gonna learn ufw b/c i already know iptables ;)
[22:51] <oomkiller> rdw200169: can you tell me how to forward it in iptables?  i can translate it easily
[22:51] <oomkiller> the real difference is a terser syntax, 99% of the rules are the same
[22:52] <rdw200169> -A PREROUTING -i wlan0 -p udp -m udp --dport 20:21 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.201:20-21
[22:52] <rdw200169> there's an example of how i forward udp ftp traffic through my desktop
[22:52] <oomkiller> hmm ok
[22:52] <oomkiller> what is -j DNAT?
[22:52] <oomkiller> or more exactly, what is DNAT
[22:53] <oomkiller> is that something built into netfilter/iptables, or is it something you have to write
[22:53] <rdw200169> it's a NAT related target
[22:53] <Deeeps> you'd also need to specify '-t nat' if operating from the command line, rather than in the :nat context already from the iptables-save output
[22:53] <rdw200169> ah yes, right Deeeps i just used the iptables-save output
[22:54] <Deeeps> DNAT - Destination NAT, port forwarding essentially
[22:54] <Deeeps> redirects packets that match the previously given rules to the new target
[22:54] <oomkiller> Deeeps: but thats not a another chain, its builtin, right?
[22:54] <Deeeps> yep
[22:54] <rdw200169> PREROUTING? yes
[22:54] <oomkiller> ok lets see
[22:54] <Deeeps> (DNAT too)
[22:55] <oomkiller> the wiki page says that i should add the rules for forwarding to ufw-before-forward
[22:55] <oomkiller> i guess thats it's version of PREROUTING
[22:55] <rdw200169> ah, you need an explaination of how this whole mess works
[22:55] <rdw200169> gimme a sec.
[22:56] <oomkiller> btw, anyone know how to scroll up with irssi, without a mouse?
[22:56] <Deeeps> page up key
[22:56] <oomkiller> thanks
[22:56] <Deeeps> alt+p and alt+n also if you haven't changed the default keybinds iirc
[22:57] <rdw200169> ftp://greamin.com/Documents/Linux%20Networking/Firewalling/ipTables%20and%20EbTables%20Packet%20Flow%20in%20Linux.png
[22:57] <oomkiller> Deeeps: do you know of a way to "check" the rules before loading them with ufw?
[22:58] <Deeeps> no idea i'm afraid
[22:58] <hads> Something like firehol's try would be cool though
[23:00] <oomkiller> well i'm about to try it
[23:00] <oomkiller> lets see if my rule works
[23:01] <oomkiller> hmm, says problem with init script, how descriptive
[23:02] <arooni-mobile> how do i make:  wget -r http://169.254.169.254/latest/user-data ..... safe to ./user-data instead of ./169.254.169.254/latest/user-data ?
[23:02] <hads> -O or something, check the man page.
[23:03] <arooni-mobile> -O is what i  used
[23:03] <arooni-mobile> it seems to just write the log
[23:04] <oomkiller> ahh, i think i see my error
[23:12] <dou213> hey guys, although k1 is on tv, i'm sitting in front of my ubuntu-box :( ... trying to configure lamp to work properly, installed php -> now when i http://localhost/info.php it says to download the file ... i googled it, common error: the php-module isn't corresponding with apache, did do: 'sudo a2enmod php5'
[23:12] <dou213> and nothing changed, still only option is to d/w the file
[23:13] <dou213> any suggestions?
[23:16] <hads> Restart apache
[23:18] <dou213> hads, still only dw
[23:29] <rdw200169> dou213, well, i have a LAMP server, but no info.php
[23:29] <rdw200169> dou213, and it works fine w/PHP
[23:29] <Deeeps> do you have libapache2-mod-php5 installed?
[23:29] <rdw200169> me?
[23:29] <Deeeps> whoever's having the problem
[23:29] <rdw200169> ah, that's dou213
[23:30] <rdw200169> dou213, did you use tasksel to install the lamp server?
[23:31] <dou213> rdw200169, y
[23:32] <dou213> rdw200169, initially, but because of problems i have encountered, i installed some additional packages on the way, couldn't say now which one
[23:32] <dou213> Deeeps, dunno, w8 i check pls
[23:33] <dou213> Deeeps, libapache2-mod-php5 already installed
[23:36] <rdw200169> i dunno then; for me it has always 'just worked'....
[23:36] <dou213> tryind to reinstall php, maybe prob will solve itself this way
[23:40] <P4C0> hello, when someone logs in via ssh where can I see the ip? I mean in which log file?
[23:41] <rdw200169> /var/log/auth.log
[23:42] <P4C0> thanks rdw200169
[23:43] <rdw200169> no prob
[23:48] <dou213> rdw200169, you can see the ip there? r u sure?
[23:48] <rdw200169> dou213, i can on my computer
[23:49] <rdw200169> dou213, to make it easier to read, do 'cat /var/log/auth.log | grep ssh'
[23:49] <dou213> rdw200169, yes you're right :)
[23:49] <dou213> cool, didn't know that
[23:49] <hads> grep ssh /var/log/auth.log
[23:50] <rdw200169> hads, yeah, that'll do it too... i'm used to the old reliable cat | grep combo ;)
[23:51] <hads> Yeah, when there's only one file involved cat isn't needed :)
[23:52] <rdw200169> i may have to break out of my stubborn ways and use that...