maxb | EagleScreen: Yes, 0.13 is newer than 0.4 | 00:27 |
---|---|---|
maxb | EagleScreen: When you build a package, it builds in a minimal environment - you have to declare Build-Depends in the control file to get anything beyond that limited subset | 00:28 |
EagleScreen | i will review Build-Depends | 00:32 |
psycose | hi, using the LP PPA, the following Makefile command @echo -e $(GPR_PROD) >> gnatgpr.prod executed via the debian/rules script displays "-e" in the file instead of undestanding the echo -e option !! when i build the package on my system i don't have this behaviour any tips ? thanks | 00:33 |
RAOF | psycose: -e isn't POSIX shell; the PPA build environment has /bin/sh set to dash, which doesn't implement -e | 00:39 |
psycose | RAOF: ok thanks fr the answer, i'm building again without it ... thanks | 00:40 |
RAOF | You could call /usr/bin/printf, or somesuch, if you really need to use the escape characters. | 00:40 |
EagleScreen | this is the debian/control file http://pastebin.ca/1326730 | 00:47 |
EagleScreen | i am only rebuilding a .deb the package to can install it in Ubuntu from ppa, it is a pacakage from Guadalinex v5, based on Ubuntu Hardy. | 00:49 |
=== matsubara-dinner is now known as matsubara | ||
rdancer | which key server can i use to upload the PGP keys? keyserver.ubuntu.com gives an error | 00:58 |
=== gary_poster changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: - | launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
EagleScreen | is it possible to upload packages for Debian sid/unstable to a ppa? | 01:46 |
vadi2 | Is there a page that explains what PPAs are? | 02:15 |
vadi2 | Only found one that explains how to get started with one... hoping to have a resource to point to for users who haven't heard of them | 02:15 |
EagleScreen | shouldn't ppa build system satisfy build-deps that are in Ubuntu repository automatically? | 02:19 |
jamesh | EagleScreen: if your package lists the dependencies it should, yes. | 02:35 |
EagleScreen | i have a package that fails and it has build-deps in debian/control | 02:37 |
jamesh | what is the build URL? | 02:38 |
EagleScreen | are you meaning the log? | 02:40 |
EagleScreen | this is my ppa https://launchpad.net/~eaglescreen/+archive/ppa | 02:40 |
EagleScreen | as you can see mount-systray - 0.4-1guada2ubuntu1~ppa1 failed to build | 02:41 |
jamesh | was thinking of a page like https://launchpad.net/~eaglescreen/+archive/ppa/+build/857280 | 02:41 |
jamesh | the error in the log file says it couldn't find gnome-doc-utils | 02:43 |
jamesh | does your package build depend on it? | 02:44 |
EagleScreen | let me see | 02:45 |
EagleScreen | jamesh look http://pastebin.ca/1326791 | 02:47 |
mrooney | Is there a good way to figure out which of my PPAs are failing to find public keys? | 02:47 |
mrooney | For example if I have 10 and apt-get gives 4 errors (then suggests running apt-get to fix it :), I don't know which 4 those are | 02:48 |
jamesh | EagleScreen: you don't have gnome-doc-utils in Build-Depends, and that is the error in your log file, so I'd try adding it. | 02:48 |
EagleScreen | that package is not listed in build-deps, but that package is build in another distribution with this control file | 02:48 |
EagleScreen | i am only porting it to Ubuntu from an distirbution based on Ubuntu hardy | 02:49 |
EagleScreen | i havent done any change in the control file | 02:49 |
jamesh | EagleScreen: perhaps gnome-doc-utils is a dependency of one of those other packages on Debian | 02:49 |
EagleScreen | then now on intrepid one of these build-deps depends on gnome-doc-utils inst it? | 02:51 |
jamesh | EagleScreen: Intrepid is based on a Debian unstable snapshot from more than six months ago, so it isn't too surprising if you find some changes. | 02:51 |
EagleScreen | i used to think that dependences of dependences was resolved | 02:52 |
EagleScreen | now i see that not for build-depends | 02:52 |
jamesh | explicitly build-depending on gnome-doc-utils should solve your immediate problem. | 02:52 |
EagleScreen | i will include it, thanks | 02:53 |
jamesh | mrooney: are you talking about warnings from apt about unknown repo signing keys? | 02:55 |
EagleScreen | i have the same problem of signing keys with my ppa | 02:57 |
EagleScreen | and also with the ppa of packagekit team | 02:57 |
mrooney | jamesh: yeah | 02:57 |
mrooney | jamesh: I understand why (new signed PPAs) but I don't understand how I am easily supposed to figure out which ones and then easily get them | 02:58 |
jamesh | mrooney: the launchpad page for the PPA should tell you. | 02:58 |
jamesh | so for example, if you have http://ppa.launchpad.net/bzr/ubuntu in your sources.list, look at https://launchpad.net/~bzr/+archive | 02:59 |
mrooney | jamesh: yeah, my question was "easily" :) | 02:59 |
jamesh | you can see which keys you've installed with "sudo apt-key list" | 02:59 |
mrooney | I have to translate that for 10 PPAs and manually review it | 02:59 |
mrooney | do you know if there are any plans to make this process easier in the future? I am not worried about myself so much but this is already confusing tons of people online, and I worry it will hurt the number of people able to use my PPA | 03:01 |
jamesh | mrooney: you could just import all the keys corresponding to "NO_PUBKEY" errors from "aptitude update" | 03:01 |
jamesh | if you trust your network connection | 03:01 |
mrooney | hmm | 03:01 |
mrooney | ubuntu needs apt-ppa:// links or something :) | 03:02 |
mrooney | Anyway it just feels like the number of steps to use a PPA doubled | 03:03 |
EagleScreen | jamesh look http://pastebin.ca/1326812 | 03:04 |
jamesh | EagleScreen: looks like those warning lines have been truncated | 03:08 |
jamesh | EagleScreen: they should continue to tell you which public key is missing | 03:08 |
EagleScreen | NO_PUBKEY 9BFC84D3205358CF and NO_PUBKEY 01E3FE37B30386B1 | 03:09 |
jamesh | so load those keys into apt's keyring? | 03:09 |
EagleScreen | it can be done with software-properties? | 03:11 |
jamesh | https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Adding%20a%20PPA%20to%20your%20Ubuntu%20repositories has instructions (and is linked from each PPA page) | 03:12 |
kriyas1 | how to checkout in bzr | 04:56 |
spiv | bzr checkout URL | 04:57 |
RAOF | kriyas1: This depends; generally you want to do something like "bzr branch <something>", where something is either a url, an existing local branch (directory), or some other spec, like "lp:do-plugins" | 04:57 |
RAOF | If you know the difference between checkout and branch, and know you want checkout, then spiv's answer is more correct ;) | 04:58 |
spiv | kriyas1: http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/latest/ might help you | 05:00 |
error404notfound | hi! | 05:35 |
error404notfound | can someone tell me how can I create a private bzr team branch? | 05:35 |
spiv | jml: ^ | 05:35 |
jml | error404notfound: you need to chat with bac, who can sort you out. | 05:36 |
jml | error404notfound: at this time of day, it's best to email him. | 05:36 |
error404notfound | any idea around what time he comes online? | 05:37 |
thumper | US eastern time | 05:37 |
error404notfound | yes, but what time, 10am? 3pm? :P | 05:37 |
thumper | error404notfound: day time | 05:38 |
error404notfound | hmm, okay, lemme do some calculation, in a mean while can someone pm me him email adress? coz I can't find it in his /whois | 05:39 |
thumper | https://launchpad.net/~bac (at a guess) | 05:39 |
error404notfound | aahhhh, its still 10 hours for him to wake up, I guess I'll email him. Thanks guys.. | 05:40 |
=== error404notfoun1 is now known as error404notfound | ||
error404notfound | https://staging.launchpad.net/ is getting a cleanup or its down? | 06:02 |
jml | spm: ^^ | 06:07 |
=== spm_ is now known as spm | ||
maxb | Some recent hppa builds have failed to upload with a "Duplicated ancestry" assertion failure. What does that mean? | 09:39 |
IntuitiveNipple | Is there any way to upload apport bug reports using HTTP (not HTTPS) so as to analyse a problem during the upload that causes it to fail? | 10:03 |
NCommander | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~michael-owens/phoronix-test-suite/motu/files - anyone know why I can't access this? | 10:34 |
TeTeT | when using launchpadlib, how do I use edge instead of staging? | 10:49 |
TeTeT | hmm, it's in the doc, silly me | 10:51 |
TeTeT | STAGING_SERVICE_ROOT with EDGE_SERVICE_ROOT | 10:51 |
jpds | NCommander: Hmm, I can. | 10:55 |
=== bigjools-out is now known as bigjools | ||
=== salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
kiko-afk | NCommander, what happens when you load it? | 12:36 |
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
=== kiko is now known as kiko-afk | ||
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
=== bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: bac| launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
=== _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | ||
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
snikker | i've a problem with wron package signature (gpg) in ppa, can you help me? | 13:56 |
snikker | *wrong | 13:57 |
AlexC_ | snikker, you're best off actually asking your question | 13:58 |
snikker | AlexC_: i'm tring to install digikam package from ppa, i've add the gpg key to my keyring, but the package manager say thet it's ot authenticated.... | 14:02 |
snikker | *it's not authenticated | 14:02 |
AlexC_ | snikker, I can't help unfortunately, was just helping to get better help =) | 14:03 |
snikker | AlexC_: oh, ok... i hope that someone can help me :) | 14:03 |
maxb | AlexC_: You need to re-run 'apt-get update' after adding a key, I think | 14:09 |
maxb | oops | 14:09 |
maxb | snikker: ^ | 14:09 |
AlexC_ | =) | 14:09 |
snikker | maxb: i'e update the list with the refresh button in synaptic... it should be the same thing... | 14:15 |
=== error404notfoun1 is now known as error404notfound | ||
error404notfound | bac: there? | 14:17 |
bac | error404notfound: hi | 14:17 |
error404notfound | bac: hi! how are you? | 14:17 |
=== r0ny is now known as j0ny | ||
bac | error404notfound: fine thanks. | 14:18 |
error404notfound | bac: in the morning, infact mid-night according to your time, I ask here that is it possible to create a private team branch, and people told me to contact you, I emailed you from launchpadm wondering if you have something new for me... | 14:19 |
bac | error404notfound: i was just replying to your email, in fact | 14:19 |
error404notfound | bac: hmmm, guess I willw ait for the reply :D | 14:19 |
error404notfound | bac: thanks.. | 14:19 |
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
bac | snikker: are you still having trouble? | 14:22 |
bac | snikker: adding the key to *your* keyring is not enough. you have to use 'apt-key' to add it to the keyring apt uses | 14:23 |
snikker | bac: yes i've do it... | 14:23 |
snikker | bac: i've used this command: gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys BF860D3661FBBBA575BE617F0BF0F083E353B3E9 && gpg --export -a BF860D3661FBBBA575BE617F0BF0F083E353B3E9 | sudo apt-key add - | 14:24 |
bac | snikker: that looks right, assuming the key is the correct one. if you do 'sudo apt-key list' do you see it? | 14:24 |
snikker | bak: the key is taken from ppa digikam page.... after "sudo apt-key list", i can see the digikam key | 14:26 |
snikker | bac: ^ | 14:26 |
bac | snikker: if the key is properly added to apt-key, you | 14:28 |
bac | and you've run 'sudo apt-get update', then it *should* work. | 14:28 |
snikker | bac: i've tried also with 'sudo apt-get update', but with no result | 14:29 |
snikker | bac: i don't understand why it doesn't work... | 14:29 |
bac | cprov: perhaps you can help snikker? | 14:30 |
cprov | snikker: which ubuntu series are you using ? | 14:31 |
snikker | cprov: 8.10 (intrepid) | 14:31 |
cprov | snikker: digikam PPA hasn't changed since we generated signing-keys, so their repo is not signed. | 14:35 |
snikker | cprov: oh, i understand... thank you | 14:35 |
kiko | cprov, oh? we only sign repos that have changed? | 14:36 |
kiko | oh, I see | 14:36 |
kiko | the keys are generated but we didn't republish? | 14:36 |
cprov | kiko: yes | 14:36 |
kiko | cprov, can we republish or too much work? | 14:36 |
cprov | kiko: not too much work on our side, but it would trigger updates on all users | 14:37 |
snikker | cprov: but here http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xBF860D3661FBBBA575BE617F0BF0F083E353B3E9&op=index say that the key was publushed the same day of the pakage, i'm wrong? | 14:38 |
cprov | snikker: publication happens around 20:00 UTC that day | 14:40 |
snikker | cprov: and the key was generated before... | 14:42 |
cprov | snikker: let me trigger the PPA updates, so we can check if the key is really working | 14:44 |
snikker | cprov: ok, thanks | 14:44 |
cprov | snikker: how to you see the exact timestamp for key generation | 14:48 |
snikker | cprov: i can't see the exact timespamp, only the date | 14:49 |
=== sale_ is now known as sale | ||
cprov | snikker: yeah, me too, annoying. | 14:51 |
cprov | snikker: the PPA will be republished in 8 minutes. | 14:52 |
bac | cprov: thanks for your help. i learned a lot... | 14:54 |
snikker | cprov: great, thank you! :) | 14:54 |
cprov | snikker: np, you're welcome. Let's see if it will work | 14:54 |
snikker | cprov: ok | 14:54 |
sinzui | me | 15:08 |
snikker | cprov: now it work! thank again :) | 15:11 |
pkt | mrevell: ping | 15:38 |
mrevell | hi pkt | 15:38 |
pkt | hi | 15:38 |
pkt | I just received a mail from you about my ppa size | 15:38 |
pkt | I 'd like to ask: how do I know the total size? | 15:39 |
pkt | (without expanding every package separately and adding the sizes manually if possible :-) | 15:39 |
RainCT | Hi | 15:40 |
RainCT | How can I delete a team? | 15:40 |
mrevell | pkt it should say it on the PPA overview page | 15:41 |
mrevell | RainCT: You need to make a request at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 15:41 |
RainCT | mrevell: urg :P. Thanks | 15:41 |
mrevell | np | 15:42 |
pkt | mrevell: it says: "Package counters and estimated archive size temporarily unavailable" | 15:42 |
mrevell | pkt: Let me ask cprov about that ^^^^^^ | 15:42 |
pkt | Btw, my ppa is a "semi-service" to the community to be honest | 15:43 |
pkt | Many of the packages there cannot be found anywhere else (to my knowledge), like eclipse, mysql-workbench and gdb-python | 15:44 |
pkt | But I cannot make any guarantees that everything will be working at all times | 15:44 |
mrevell | pkt: Cool, sounds great. You're not at the limit right now. AFAICS you're at 962 MB, so you're close. Do you plan to add more soon? | 15:48 |
pkt | Not sure yet | 15:49 |
pkt | But it is quite possible | 15:49 |
pkt | I might add some kernel/virtualization stuff | 15:50 |
pkt | and/or some eclipse plugins or eclipse dependencies when I find some time | 15:51 |
pkt | mrevell: I deleted the superseeded version of mysql-workbench (about 200M total) so that should solve the problem for now | 15:56 |
mrevell | pkt: Cool :) | 15:56 |
rzr_ | pkt: let me thank you in person for eclipse-3.4 : I credited you on http://www.newlc.com/en/deb-packages-android-sdk-bleeding-edge-cupcake-images | 15:57 |
rzr_ | mrevell: thx for notifying me , I am doing some effort in cleaning obsolete stuff | 15:57 |
pkt | rzr_: you are most welcome :-) | 15:58 |
rzr_ | pkt: btw about ppa's size it's writen in upload mail alert IICR | 15:58 |
rzr_ | mrevell: PPA is in thanks part too on the same url :) | 15:59 |
pkt | It was indeed written in a rejection mail I got a while ago, but not in the mail I got a while ago | 15:59 |
pkt | oops | 15:59 |
pkt | 'but not in the mail I got a few minutes ago' | 16:00 |
pkt | anyway, have to leave now (busy afternoon). Nice talking to you guys :-) | 16:00 |
rzr_ | pkt: while you're here | 16:01 |
rzr_ | would you like to set up a eclipse team ? | 16:01 |
rzr_ | I have some subclipse plugin to giveaway | 16:01 |
rzr_ | the eclipse team already exists i think | 16:01 |
pkt | yes, it already exists | 16:02 |
pkt | I think it is open too | 16:02 |
pkt | If I remember correctly it was started by nathan (aka rockwalrus) | 16:03 |
pkt | There is another team as well (eclipsers?) but it seemingly never actually produced anything | 16:03 |
rzr_ | there is one guy who package some plugins too | 16:03 |
pkt | yes, I saw his comment in the bug | 16:04 |
rzr_ | what do you think about merging it all in a ppa ? | 16:04 |
pkt | for now, the biggest problem for eclipse is to get the dependencies in | 16:04 |
rzr_ | yea i know | 16:04 |
pkt | that wouldn't be such a bad idea :-) | 16:04 |
pkt | I 've been just too busy to bother | 16:05 |
pkt | anyway, anybody can copy packages between the ppas I think | 16:05 |
rzr_ | we'll talk about this later elsewhere ok :) | 16:06 |
pkt | cool, bye for now :-) | 16:06 |
rzr_ | bye | 16:06 |
rzr_ | mrevell: keep his ppa it worths it :) | 16:07 |
mrevell | We're not removing PPAs :) I'm just checking to see if people need more space | 16:07 |
=== fawek_ is now known as fawek | ||
maxb | ooi, what became of primero? | 16:08 |
rzr_ | mrevell: well any more space would be welcomen but i can understand everything is limited | 16:09 |
mrevell | rzr_: I'm happy to increase people's limits if they're making good community use of it :) | 16:09 |
rzr_ | well it's not up to us to decide if we're doing good or evil :) | 16:10 |
rzr_ | BTW, you should have stats of downloaded packages ? | 16:10 |
sidelil | excuse me is stagin.launchpad down at the moment? | 16:45 |
Goundy | sidelil no it's working for me | 16:45 |
sidelil | Goundy, oh, I cannot connect now. I could 1 hour ago. :( I hope i did not do anything wrong, im trying to learn how to use it | 16:47 |
Goundy | sidelil you can't crash launchpad dude you're not the only person who's using it | 16:48 |
mrevell | sidelil: It's offline at the moment. Should be back shortly. | 16:48 |
sidelil | mrevell, ok thanks. | 16:48 |
Goundy | mrevell huh? what's offline? it works here | 16:49 |
mrevell | Goundy: https://staging.launchpad.net/ | 16:49 |
Goundy | mrevell https://launchpad.net/~auresdev ... it works | 16:50 |
Goundy | weird | 16:50 |
mrevell | Goundy: Yeah, that's not on staging :) Our staging server is temporarily offline. | 16:50 |
Goundy | staging... oh... I ignored that word in his question I thought he made a mistake >_< | 16:50 |
Goundy | sorry ! | 16:50 |
sidelil | excuse me, what can NOT be done in a project register on staging.launchpad that could be possible on a proper launchpad project? Basically, has it got restricted functionalities or is exactly the same? Does the staging project get deleted ater a while? | 16:52 |
Goundy | whats the difference between staging.lp.net and lp.net ? I don't really get it | 16:53 |
sidelil | Basically, can I just use normally staging for a few days, while i get used to launchpad? | 16:53 |
sidelil | yes | 16:53 |
sidelil | Goundy, im just asking whats the difference, eg if i would not be able to do some particular things on staging that i could do on normal lp | 16:54 |
Goundy | sidelil well I asked about the difference I have no idea on what staging.lp is | 16:54 |
Goundy | ^^ | 16:54 |
sidelil | Goundy, ah ok sorry! Staging is to try out lp as far as i know | 16:55 |
Goundy | Ah.. | 16:55 |
Goundy | I started using lp directly it's not so hard imho | 16:55 |
bac | sidelil: changes made on staging get wiped out once a day (as a rule) | 16:55 |
Goundy | I got to go now | 16:56 |
Goundy | see you | 16:56 |
sidelil | see you | 16:56 |
sidelil | bac, ok thanks that's exactly what i was looking for! Thanks! | 16:56 |
bac | sidelil: any *real* work you want to do needs to be done on launchpad.net. as mentioned earlier staging is for trying things out that won't be permanent. | 16:56 |
sidelil | bac, yeah i got it! Thanks | 16:57 |
=== rzr_ is now known as ZrZ | ||
maxb | Yay, hppa's back to two buildds :-) | 17:50 |
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-dinner | ||
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
=== vacationlogger is now known as apachelogger | ||
lamalex | hey guys, has anyone had time to look at lp 270031 | 19:55 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 270031 in launchpad-buildd "Mono segfaults on amd64 PPA buildds" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/270031 | 19:55 |
bac | lamalex: i'm checking to see if any progress has been made. | 20:08 |
attilacyilmazlar | is there anyone here from Ubuntu Netbook Remix Team?? | 20:08 |
lamalex | bac: thank you | 20:09 |
bac | lamalex: that bug has been marked invalid. are you still seeing the problem? | 20:09 |
lamalex | when was it marked invalid? | 20:09 |
lamalex | on the bug, it's marked confirmed | 20:09 |
lamalex | oh | 20:10 |
lamalex | wtf | 20:10 |
lamalex | it was confirmed 10 minutes ago | 20:10 |
lamalex | who marked it invalid | 20:10 |
bac | lamalex: 5 minutes ago, in response to my query | 20:10 |
lamalex | heh | 20:10 |
lamalex | the 64bit packages build fine elsewhere | 20:10 |
bac | lamalex: read the final comment. it seems to be a problem with mono, not the build environment | 20:10 |
lamalex | including ubuntu main repos | 20:10 |
lamalex | bac: our packager isn't around right now, I'm sure he'll have more to say about it than I do | 20:14 |
bac | lamalex: great, i can only suggest you and he add more information to the existing bug | 20:16 |
maxb | lamalex, bac: There is a different bug which identifies Xen as the cause | 20:16 |
maxb | LP 237724 | 20:17 |
ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/237724/+text) | 20:17 |
maxb | LP 237724 | 20:17 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 237724 in linux "linux-image-2.6.24-18-xen breaks mono" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/237724 | 20:17 |
lamalex | maxb: ahha, thank you | 20:21 |
lamalex | should LP 270031 be marked a dupe of LP 237724 | 20:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 270031 in launchpad-buildd "Mono segfaults on amd64 PPA buildds" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/270031 | 20:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 237724 in linux "linux-image-2.6.24-18-xen breaks mono" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/237724 | 20:21 |
* maxb was just trying to do that but Malone is being awkward | 20:22 | |
bac | thanks maxb | 20:22 |
maxb | Apparently you can't mark a bug as a duplicate if it itself has duplicates :-/ | 20:23 |
* maxb has retargeted all the dupes at bug 237724 now | 20:26 | |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 237724 in linux "linux-image-2.6.24-18-xen breaks mono" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/237724 | 20:26 |
=== salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
lamalex | maxb: yeah, I was going to file a bug on that duplicate thing | 20:31 |
lamalex | it should automagically redirect the bugs | 20:32 |
=== spiv_ is now known as spiv | ||
=== bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Help contact: -| launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net | ||
Demosthenes | can i have launchpad generate a release tar.gz from the tagged branch it already has? it seems redundant to create that locally and upload. | 23:14 |
spiv | Demosthenes: not yet, but it would be nice if it could | 23:20 |
spiv | Demosthenes: file a bug for it | 23:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!