[02:05] <Nafai> I uploaded packages to a PPA about 15 minutes or so ago and I can't find them in the build queue anywhere on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+builds
[02:05] <Nafai> dput claimed the upload was successful
[02:09] <Nafai> The package was mpfr 2.4.0-1ubuntu1 for the PPA named "nafai"
[02:09] <Nafai> This is my first time trying to use a PPA
[02:13] <jml> Nafai: all the soyuz guys are asleep right now, it seems.
[02:13] <Nafai> Ok
[02:13]  * jml looks around for bugs / questions that might be relevant here
[02:13] <Nafai> I'm patient
[02:14] <jml> Nafai: do you have a link for the build page?
[02:14] <Nafai>         try:
[02:15] <Nafai> Whoops, wrong paste
[02:15] <Nafai> Something other than https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+builds or are you referring to something else?
[02:15] <jml> I don't really know what I'm referring to :)
[02:15] <mwhudson> Nafai: a link to your ppa maybe?
[02:16] <jml> https://edge.launchpad.net/~nafai/+archive/ppa is empty
[02:17] <Nafai> Hrm
[02:17] <Nafai> Maybe the instructions on the PPA howto were wrong
[02:18] <jml> Nafai: got a URL for the howto?
[02:18] <Nafai> What should incoming be in my ~/.dput.cf ?
[02:18] <maxb> PPA builds don't show up on /ubuntu/+builds
[02:18] <Nafai> https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA
[02:18] <mwhudson> Nafai: i'm pretty sure that if something went wrong in the initial processing, you should have got a mail about it
[02:19] <Nafai> maxb: Ah!  That's my problem :)
[02:19] <Nafai> mwhudson: Ah, there's the mail, just took a while getting here
[02:19] <Nafai> Nevermind me :)
[02:19] <mwhudson> the usual mistake being accidentally trying to upload a package to ubuntu
[02:21] <maxb> Between the freeze, and having two hppa buildds again, the primary ubuntu build queue is the nearest to empty it's been for a long time :-)
[02:21] <jml> Nafai: please feel free to update the wiki page or file some bugs about this.
[02:21] <Nafai> will do
[02:22] <mwhudson> maxb: i guess a new architecture will do that
[02:25] <Nafai> Do the PPAs have a build page?
[02:26] <Nafai> Oh, n/m.  I see it
[02:26] <Nafai> Yay, it is working this time.
[02:26] <Nafai> Thanks for the help guys
[02:30] <mwhudson> np
[04:41] <poolie> jml, is bug 293710 really Low?
[04:45] <stdin> it's an inconvenience rather than a blocking issue, Low is probably appropriate
[04:47] <jml> poolie: in a choice between "High" and "Low", I'd pick "Low"
[04:49] <jml> poolie: There are about 50 open code review bugs (see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bugs?field.tag=code-review). Not all of them can be high priority, sadly.
[04:50] <poolie> fairenough
[04:50] <poolie> that list does look sensibly sorted
[05:07] <jml> poolie: so, if I were doing the work, I'd probably just get a list of code-review ui bugs and then do them in chunks that makes sense re implementation.
[05:11] <OsamaK> Hello. I just uploaded a po translation file, it's marked as 'blocked'. What does that mean?

[05:51] <jml> poolie: ping
[05:51] <jml> poolie: why do you think https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/238453 is intermittent?
[06:02] <mwhudson> jml: that's another way of saying "the scanner sometimes runs slowly" i think
[06:03] <jml> mwhudson: hmm. in that case, I will close the bug and make sure we have another bug about fixing the scanner.
[06:09] <thumper> jml: it may also have been mirror delay hitting
[06:09] <jml> thumper: well, that was the original cause, for sure.
[06:13] <mwhudson> not if loggerhead had a different view to the branch page
[06:13] <mwhudson> but anyway
[06:13] <mwhudson> make scanner part of puller, make puller scheduling smarter, optionally add message queue pixie dust --> win
[06:17] <spm> any leftover pixie dust for loggerhead?
[06:17] <spm> ... no particular reason for asking
[06:24] <OsamaK> Any idea about my question?
[06:33] <mwhudson> OsamaK: sorry, no
[06:33] <OsamaK> fine what about the other 120 people :P
[06:34] <mrooney> What is considered the proper way to push to a newly created project? bzr push lp:~lpname/proj/trunk, then go into launchpad and set trunk as that branch?
[06:41] <mwhudson> mrooney: yes
[06:42] <mwhudson> mrooney: possibly one day it will be automatically set as the trunk, but not yet
[06:42] <mrooney> yeah, that would be slick
[06:42] <mrooney> at least if the pusher is the project owner
[06:42] <mwhudson> yes, i think that's one of the reasons it hasn't happened yet
[06:43] <mrooney> mwhudson: what is one of the reasons?
[06:43] <mwhudson> depends-on: telepathy
[06:43] <mwhudson> this kind of fuzzy thinking
[06:43] <mwhudson> if it's pushed by a project maintainer and is called trunk though, that would be a start
[06:45] <mrooney> that doesn't seem fuzzy or depending on telepathy
[06:46] <mrooney> that was my first intution, to push to lp:projname, then I tried lp:projname/trunk, then I gave in and did it the other way :)
[07:23] <mwhudson> mrooney: an interesting data point :)
[07:54] <jms1989> anyone know why the staging server is not working?
[08:44] <jms1989> anyone know why the staging server is not working?
[10:54] <domas> bazaar.launchpad sick?
[10:54] <james_w> domas: seems so
[10:54] <domas> 64 bytes from 91.189.90.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=2152.608 ms
[10:54] <domas> 64 bytes from 91.189.90.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=1153.349 ms
[10:54] <domas> hah
[10:54] <domas> DoS!
[10:56] <elmo> we're working on it
[10:57] <domas> thanks, folks! :)
[10:57] <domas> no urge, just wanted to show a new Feature to the world! :)
[11:03] <amondo> launchpad bzr was down a few minutes ago
[11:03] <amondo> i got "connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: No route to host"
[11:04] <amondo> but now it is back
[11:04] <amondo> is there like a server status page for the launchpad servers?
[11:05] <philn> heya
[11:06] <philn> i'm trying to push a branch but there's a lock on the server and i can't remove it with that break-lock command.. can someone help me?
[11:06] <philn> lock is lp-45632656:///~elisa-developers/elisa/tv_movie_db/.bzr/branch/lock
[11:21] <beuno> philn, bzr break-lock lp:~/user/project/branch?
[11:25] <philn> beuno: ok that worked, but bzr break lp-45632656:///~elisa-developers/elisa/tv_movie_db/.bzr/branch/lock (which was the command suggested  by bzr) did not
[11:26] <beuno> philn, yeap, it's a bug in bzr, I think it's filed, but if not, i will
[11:27] <jpds> Should there be a text field on Launchpad bugs saying: "This bug affects %d people". ?
[11:27] <jpds> Or somewhere I can find the data?
[11:28] <beuno> jpds, it's currently not exposed
[11:28] <beuno> you can order bug listings by number of affected users
[11:28] <beuno> but the actual number isn't exposed
[11:29] <jpds> beuno: Ah, thanks.
[11:31] <philn> thanks for the help beuno, seeya
[13:01] <domas> ghm, loggerhead is actually laggerhead :)
[14:16] <domas> will loggerhead ever start working again?
[14:16] <domas> :)
[14:19] <Ursinha> beuno, ^
[14:19] <beuno> domas, it's down?
[14:19] <domas> beuno: lagged for multiple (>12)h
[14:19] <domas> compare https://code.launchpad.net/~mydumper/mydumper/trunk and http://dammit.lt:8080/mydumper/changes
[14:21] <domas> well, maybe not 12, but definitely >4
[14:22] <beuno> domas, ah
[14:22] <beuno> that's not loggerhead
[14:22] <beuno> but I see what you mean
[14:22] <domas> beuno: ghm, thats the only implication I see, I can successfully clone/branch up-to-date trees
[14:22] <beuno> loggerhead is the *only* think that's working!
[14:22] <beuno> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mydumper/mydumper/trunk/changes
[14:22] <beuno> it's Launchpad's branch scanner
[14:22] <domas> ah!
[14:23] <domas> indeed
[14:23] <domas> sorry for confusing
[14:23] <domas> :)
[14:23] <beuno> no worries
[14:24] <beuno> we're following up on the branch scanner problem
[14:24] <domas> hehe, oki!
[14:24] <beuno> hopefully we'll get it back up soon
[14:24] <domas> today it was some bigger crash, I noticed
[14:25] <domas> I should brush up my UI skills and add 'hide column' functionality to loggerhead :)
[14:26] <beuno> oh, patches are very wlecome on Loggerhead  ;)
[14:26] <domas> beautiful thing so far :)
[14:26] <domas> iterating colors, etc, yummy! :-)))
[14:36] <intellectronica> beuno: speaking of which, what do i need to do to get my download link branch merged? can you review it? or should i ask rockstar?
[14:39] <beuno> intellectronica, file a merge request, and I'll try to get to it first
[14:39] <beuno> if rockstar does, he can get the karma
[14:39] <beuno> maybe even mwhudson, who is currently playing around in LH
[14:43] <domas> hehe, feature request, in 'add file' -> "make tarball out of bzr branch" :))
[14:43] <domas> would allow me to release more than 5 times a day! \o/
[14:43] <beuno> domas, sounds like a great idea
[14:43] <beuno> if you file a bug requesting it
[14:43] <beuno> it just may happen...  ;)
[14:43] <domas> hehehe
[14:44] <domas> <3
[14:48] <domas> beuno: bug#325761 \o/
[14:48] <beuno> bug 325761
[14:49] <domas> huh
[14:49] <domas> poor ubott
[14:49] <domas> u
[14:49] <rockstar> intellectronica, request a review from me.
[15:06] <cgregan> Does anyone know if there is a way to search bugs for milestone=none?
[15:13] <leonardr> ^-intellectronica, maybe you can help cgregan
[15:14] <intellectronica> cgregan: unfortunately not. iirc someone filed a but about this just a few days ago. let me try and find it
[15:14] <cgregan> thanks ﻿leonardr, ﻿intellectronica
[15:20] <domas> heeee, branch scanner is there!
[15:20] <domas> yay people
[15:20] <bebraw> sounds useful
[15:28] <intellectronica> cgregan: i can find that bug. maybe i imagined it. care to file one?
[15:28] <intellectronica> cgregan: "can't", that is
[15:30] <cgregan> ﻿intellectronica: I would be happy to
[15:30] <cgregan> thanks
[15:33] <matsubara> bug 70709
[15:36] <matsubara> cgregan: ^
[15:37] <cgregan> matsubara: thanks.....I will dup the one I just entered
[15:47] <intellectronica> matsubara, cgregan: i knew i remembered _something_ about such a bug :)
[15:47] <cgregan> ﻿intellectronica: It has a rather low number.....any chance it is getting fixed any time soon?
[15:48] <intellectronica> cgregan: can't promise anything, but the renewed interest in this bug means that yes, we'll probably try to do this soon
[15:49] <intellectronica> cgregan: b.t.w you can try and use the webservice api to get this data. are you comfortably doing this sort of thing? if yes i'm happy to help
[15:49] <cgregan> ﻿intellectronica: excellent
[15:50] <cgregan> ﻿intellectronica: Unfortunately I am no where near a coder.
[16:30] <Dal90> Hi -- I have a new project that there was license question on.  I've fixed that license, but it's still in limbo with translations under review.  What needs to be done to fix this?  https://translations.launchpad.net/getmiro/3.0/+imports
[16:54] <epsy> Are there any icons for blueprints?
[17:29] <AlexC_> morning
[17:29] <spitfire_> evening :P
[17:29] <AlexC_> I'm wondering how LP handles changing translations files. Does it merge them in with the older uploaded ones, and any strings added/deleted will be handled correctly
[17:29] <AlexC_> spitfire_, evening here to =)
[17:32] <intellectronica> AlexC_: maybe henninge can help you?
[17:32] <AlexC_> =)
[17:34] <henninge> AlexC_: Uploading new files updates previous *uploaded* translated strings. Strings *changed* in Launchpad are not updated, unless they were untranslated before.
[17:35] <AlexC_> henninge, ok thanks. One other thing, how does the process work for copy files into a new series? I'm a little confused about which way to do this. If we were to do translations for 'trunk', when we come to release say, 2.3 of our software - what do we do with the translations?
[17:41] <henninge> AlexC_: You will have to re-import them. There is copying of translations between product series.
[17:41] <henninge> AlexC_: *no* copying. Sorry.
[17:42] <AlexC_> henninge, and we'd then loose all translations once we re-import?
[17:42] <AlexC_> unless we can also upload the .po files?
[17:43] <henninge> AlexC_: Oh yes, you can!
[17:43] <AlexC_> ok cool, kind of a ball ache but it'll do I guess =)
[17:43] <AlexC_> thanks very much
[17:44] <henninge> AlexC_: hang on, there is a help page for uploads, trying to find it
[17:44] <ArepaKing> Hello Everyone.. I am trying to register my GPG key in lauchpad but I keep getting the same message over and over.. can somebody give me some guidance?
[17:44] <ArepaKing> the message is: The signed content does not match the message found in the email.
[17:48] <ArepaKing> hello...
[17:50] <mrevell> leonardr: Are you able to help ArepaKing?
[17:51] <ArepaKing> thanks mrevell
[17:53] <henninge> AlexC_: https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject
[17:53] <AlexC_> henninge, thanks
[17:53] <henninge> henninge: Please read the section "Ensuring a successful import"
[17:53] <henninge> AlexC_: ^
[17:54] <henninge> AlexC_: That is about the naming conventions for the files so that the import runs smoothly. Prepare a tarball like that and upload it, should work fine.
[17:54] <AlexC_> henninge, is there any further explanation of: "you upload templates in a tarball, so the system can see what directories you want them in; give each template its own directory."
[17:54] <leonardr> ArepaKing, what client are you using to send the mail?
[17:55] <leonardr> if you have a copy of the mail, send it to leonard.richardson@canonical.com and i'll look at it
[17:55] <henninge> AlexC_: No :-( I just saw that, too...
[17:55] <henninge> AlexC_: I was too quick in my judgement.
[17:55] <AlexC_> henninge, hum, ok. hehe, no worries =)
[17:56] <ArepaKing> Hi leonardr.. I will forward you the email right away..
[17:56] <henninge> AlexC_: But it is easy: name the template like the translation domain (domain.pot) and the po files with the language code (de.po, fr.po, etc).
[17:57] <AlexC_> henninge, yeah, just generating all of those now. Thing is, we have many .pot files (one for each module within our project) - how will Launchpad handle that?
[17:57] <henninge> AlexC_: put the po files in a directory that is named like the translation domain, too. You can put the template in there, too.
[17:57] <ArepaKing> leonardr.. done
[17:57] <AlexC_> henninge, we currently have no .po files, was just thinking ahead
[17:58] <henninge> AlexC_: yeah, one directory per translation domain/template. Do not mix pofiles for different translation domains.
[17:58] <Rinchen> ArepaKing, give leonardr the bug number too please if you have not
[17:58] <ArepaKing> all right
[17:59] <ArepaKing> this is the bug number: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-documentation/+bug/323283/
[17:59] <AlexC_> henninge, so for example, 4 modules = 4 directories (each named of the translations domain), with a single .pot file in them?
[17:59] <ArepaKing> thanks Rinchen..
[18:02] <henninge> AlexC_: It only gets important for the po files later.
[18:02] <AlexC_> henninge, ah ok, so I can just throw all of these .pot files in a .tar.gz archive and put that up?
[18:03] <henninge> AlexC_: I was gonna say: but that structure is OK.
[18:03] <henninge> AlexC_: Yes, as long as they are named domain1.pot, domain2.pot, etc
[18:03] <AlexC_> henninge, they sure are. Awesome, thanks for the helps
[18:04] <henninge> AlexC_: pleasure
[18:42] <BUGabundo> is this a LP high load /timeout or a apport one ?
[18:42] <BUGabundo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/114124/
[18:43] <BUGabundo> leonardr: ping
[18:44] <matsubara> looks like apport
[18:44] <matsubara> BUGabundo: and it's just a warning, so I don't think it was fatal
[18:45] <matsubara> seems like apport completed the upload successfully
[18:45] <matsubara> well, at least it started upload, not sure if it finished
[18:48] <BUGabundo> it did finish, matsubara. at least it looks like everything (or somethings) got attached to the report
[18:49] <BUGabundo> but since you guys are changing EDGE timeouts
[18:49] <BUGabundo> I thouth it would be better to let you know
[18:51] <matsubara> does apport use edge?
[18:51] <matsubara> BUGabundo: it's not related to performance work but thanks for letting us know
[18:51] <BUGabundo> I do...
[18:51] <BUGabundo> so I think it will use it too, once Firefox logins
[18:51] <BUGabundo> matsubara: np