[08:12] <asac> ahoi
[09:07] <asac> fta: firefox-3.1 build is broken
[09:08] <asac> it has b2 as MaxVersion
[09:23] <fta> ??
[09:24] <fta> asac, ??
[09:54] <[reed]> fta: did you addd checkin-needed to mozilla bug 461277?
[09:54] <[reed]> oh
[09:54] <fta> not my bug
[09:54] <[reed]> that's asac's fault
[09:54] <[reed]> he should have landed it himself
[09:54] <[reed]> if he doesn't have time, he can add checkin-needed
[09:54] <[reed]> and then ping me
[10:13] <asac> fta: try to install the firefox-3.1 packages from archive -> busted
[10:13] <asac> fta: i added the lower biuld-depends bound now
[12:22] <BUGabundo> hi
[12:22] <BUGabundo> fta asac ping
[12:23] <BUGabundo> "Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.1b2 and 1.9.1b2."
[12:23] <BUGabundo> getting probs again, after todays update!
[12:23] <BUGabundo> apport can't lunch firefox
[12:33] <asac> BUGabundo: downgrade for the time being
[12:33] <asac> update coming soonish
[12:34] <BUGabundo> thanks
[12:34] <BUGabundo> just running 3.2 for now!
[12:35] <asac> yeah sorry
[12:35] <asac> all will be fine ;)
[12:35] <BUGabundo> yeah... we all hate regressions
[12:36]  * BUGabundo and now we return to our regular broadcast, at #Tokamak2
[12:39] <fta2> asac, it never happens in my ppa because my bot imposes strict build deps for xul
[12:39] <asac> fta2: yes. all fine. i will test something else and just upload .head again
[12:39] <asac> with bumped lower bound
[12:43] <fta2> a while ago, i wanted to force a FTBFS when this happens
[12:44] <asac> fta2: when what happens?
[12:44] <fta2> maybe I should do it
[12:44] <fta2> gre mismatch
[12:44] <asac> fta2: bumping lower bounds is better because it will go into dependency wait
[12:44] <asac> and you dont have to retry on all archs that are slow and so on
[12:45] <fta2> but you have to update the branch each time upstream bump it
[12:45] <fta2> that's why i dropped it in the 1st place, as long as i was in my ppa, it was all fine
[12:45] <asac> well ... just when we upload to real archive
[12:45] <asac> you already do that in your auto build stuff
[12:46] <fta2> Upload Warnings:
[12:46] <fta2> PPA exceeded its size limit (1733.00 of 1024.00 MiB). Ask a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ if you need more space.
[12:46] <asac> fta2: daily?
[12:46] <asac> yes. thats ok. i talked to mrevell .. i have just have him to give the number
[12:46] <fta2> Upload Warnings:
[12:46] <fta2> PPA exceeded its size limit (2113.00 of 1024.00 MiB). Ask a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ if you need more space.
[12:46] <fta2> i'm flooded with logs
[12:47] <asac> -daily?
[12:47] <asac> or something else?
[12:47] <fta2> daily
[12:52] <fta2> mine is limited to 7G now
[12:53] <asac> sigh
[12:53] <asac> symbolic functions is not the cause for the remote client crashes
[12:54] <asac> better trying to rebuild ffox for real now
[13:24] <BUGabundo> fta2 7G ? damn
[13:24] <fta2> BUGabundo, ? why damn?
[13:24] <BUGabundo> really big sources!
[13:35] <fta2> Bug 325986 :)
[13:35] <fta2> it was filed on firefox-3.0
[13:35] <BUGabundo> eheheeeheh
[14:21] <asac> lol
[14:26] <gnomefreak> asac: you around?
[14:31] <asac> gnomefreak: yes
[14:31] <gnomefreak> asac: do you have a diff of what you did to fix_ftbfs_with_cairo_fb.patch
[14:32] <gnomefreak> if not i can grab it i was hoping you could save me a step or 3
[14:32] <asac> gnomefreak: isnt the branch fixed?
[14:32] <gnomefreak> asac: no its failing to apply
[14:33] <gnomefreak> ill get error in a few moniutes since i dont remember yesterday error
[14:33] <asac> gnomefreak: which btranch/package are you talking about?
[14:33] <gnomefreak> SM2
[14:33] <asac> gnomefreak: i think i fixed that. did you try to pull the latest?
[14:33] <gnomefreak> its a gfx
[14:33] <gnomefreak> asac: yes
[14:33] <asac> yeah i know it
[14:33] <asac> let me check
[14:34] <gnomefreak> ok
[14:35] <asac> gnomefreak: its committed let me see if its not pushed .... should be rev 191
[14:35] <gnomefreak> yes it was pushed
[14:35] <asac> gnomefreak: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.0.dev
[14:35] <asac> that definitly works
[14:36] <gnomefreak> give me a few minutes it failed yesterday to apply patch ill get you the error as soon as it fails again
[14:37] <gnomefreak> 190 is the revision that was pushed.
[14:37] <asac> gnomefreak: its 191
[14:37] <asac> gnomefreak: look at the branch
[14:37] <asac> i pasted
[14:38] <gnomefreak> i am looking at it. 191 was wallet
[14:38] <asac> 15:35 < asac> gnomefreak:  https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.0.dev
[14:38] <asac> yeah ... 190 is the fix
[14:38] <asac> just produce the proper orig.tar.gz tarball
[14:38] <gnomefreak> i did
[14:39] <gnomefreak> debian/rules get-orig-source DEBIAN_DATE=20090201r1815 is what i ran to produce the tarball
[14:40] <gnomefreak> seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a3~hg20090201r1815+nobinonly.orig.tar.gz is what i got
[14:46] <gnomefreak> asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/617231
[14:46] <asac> hmm
[14:46] <gnomefreak> did you forget to remove a part. it looks like it cant find the file in source to patch
[14:47] <asac> i am just trying
[14:48] <asac> i definitl yhave no chnages in my local bzr branch that arent pushed
[14:48] <gnomefreak> I'm building off the mt branch
[14:48] <asac> seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a3~hg20090201r1815+nobinonly.orig.tar.gz
[14:48] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. the branch i gave above is it
[14:49] <asac> gnomefreak: maybe do a fresh checkout?
[14:49] <gnomefreak> yep
[14:49] <gnomefreak> asac: let me know if it fails to apply patches and if its still me ill try to pull again
[14:49] <gnomefreak> its fairly early in build
[14:50] <gnomefreak> gfx isnt a dir in mozilla
[14:51] <gnomefreak> from what the unpacked source gives me
[14:51] <asac> gnomefreak: in dieed
[14:51] <gnomefreak> oops
[14:52] <gnomefreak> dont try find gfx .
[14:52] <gnomefreak> its in moxilla
[14:52] <gnomefreak> patch mozilla/mozilla/gfx
[14:53] <gnomefreak> path even
[14:54] <gnomefreak> test/seamonkey-2.0/work/build-area/seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a3
[14:54] <gnomefreak> ~hg20090201r1815+nobinonly/mozilla/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src
[14:54] <gnomefreak> why would they do that why not just place it in upper level dir
[15:17] <gnomefreak> ill see if i hae time to get to it sometime after email
[15:46] <gnomefreak> mozilla 395668
[16:18] <fta2> asac, do you plan to push the fixed ff3.1 or not? people are getting angry and are spamming me :P
[16:19] <BUGabundo1> please please!! FF3.2 fix one of my bugs but introduced anoter
[16:21] <fta2> BUGabundo1, bug with 3.2 ?
[16:21] <fta2> use https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa :)
[16:23] <fta2> BUGabundo1, are you sure for the gwibber bug? it doesn't work for me
[16:31] <gnomefreak> anyone have a handy .ical i can use to test in sunbird
[16:39] <gnomefreak> hmmmmmm it seems to be the calendar that is messed up
[16:40] <gnomefreak> ill be back in a few
[16:42] <dorgan> hello all
[16:42] <dorgan> i am hopinh someone in here can help me
[16:43] <dorgan> I am opening a dialog window via openDialog and now I need to pass the information entered to that parent window how do i do thi?
[16:45] <asac> dorgan: i think its easiest to give the window a name and use that to refer to it ... or just pass the window as an argument
[16:45]  * asac on the train
[16:45] <dorgan> you mean the second parameter of openDialog?
[16:47] <dorgan> or win = openDialog(...)...?
[16:49] <asac> dorgan: if you need the child you probably need to give the window a name then
[16:49] <asac> thought you were looking for the partn
[16:50] <dorgan> ok let me restate this I have a dialog window that has some fields on it and I need to access those fields from the window that opened the dialog
[16:50] <dorgan> i am not sure what you mean by name the window
[17:09] <gnomefreak> asac: i have to get to work its already noon i wont have time today to look at the SM2 patch if you get a spare minute today look at it for me please or i will get to it mondayish.
[17:12] <dorgan> asac: you still around?
[17:17] <dorgan> damn
[17:22] <fta2> [reed], https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/326129
[17:26] <dorgan> so how do I get the values of fields in a dialog box down to the parent?
[17:26] <[reed]> fta2: file that upstream, please?
[17:28] <dorgan> ?
[17:36] <asac> sry, bad connection (on train 3g)
[17:36] <asac> dorgan: ^^ sry ... i would suggest to also ask on #web or something
[17:36] <asac> we are more about firefox development than website stuff ;)
[17:37] <dorgan> i am developing a thunderbrid extension
[17:37] <dorgan> lol
[17:37] <asac> oh
[17:37] <dorgan> the documentation or better yet explanation of documentation is pretty poor
[17:37] <asac> dorgan: its a standard javascript thing
[17:37] <asac> have you looked at MDC?
[17:37] <dorgan> yeah but I dont think i've ever done it with javascript
[17:38] <asac> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript
[17:38] <dorgan> yeah theres nothing on there that tells you how to do it..just how to pass arguments to openDialog() not how to get information from it
[17:38] <asac> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.openDialog
[17:38] <asac> dorgan: newWindow = openDialog(url, name, features, arg1, arg2, ...)
[17:38] <asac> so yeah you get the newWindow in that way
[17:38] <BUGabundo> fta: ping
[17:39] <BUGabundo> since you are talking about a daily package of gwibber
[17:39] <asac> so you should be able to use that to find the tags you want to manipulate/intrspect
[17:39] <dorgan> asac: ok so now how to i get a field value out of newWindow?
[17:39] <asac> introspect
[17:39] <asac> dorgan: search for the tag (window.getElementById)
[17:39] <BUGabundo> is it possible to have a package that is a script that justs gets the trunk version and installs it in real time?
[17:39] <asac> or something
[17:39] <asac> of course you need to give the field you awant to look at a id
[17:40] <BUGabundo> basicly just runs 'cd /tmp/;bzr branch lp:gwibber;cd gwibber; sudo python setup.py install'
[17:40] <dorgan> asac: yeah window.close destroys it
[17:40] <asac> e.g. <input id="textfield_with_name" ..../>
[17:40] <dorgan> hmm oki i think there is somethign on that page that can help me
[17:40] <asac> -> window.getElemrntsBId("textfield_with_name");
[17:41] <asac> window.getElementById i mean ;)
[17:42] <asac> look at the dom reference to get all the info: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Gecko_DOM_Reference
[17:42] <asac> but as i said, thats really basic website javascript swtuff :) ... maybe they didnt document it in that doetail
[17:43] <asac> try to search for a html javascript tutorial
[17:43] <dorgan> ok i got it you have to pass it as an argument then edit window.arguments[0] then i can access them
[18:03] <asac> dorgan: thoguth you wanted to access child window from parent window context and not the other way around
[18:03] <asac> anyway, I guess you will figure :)
[18:07] <asac> ok ... most likely i get bad connection soon again ;)
[18:09] <BUGabundo>  !topic
[18:09] <BUGabundo>  /topic
[18:22] <asac> @time
[18:23] <BUGabundo> asac: I think the bot is dead!
[18:23] <BUGabundo> bad ubottu
[18:24] <asac> hmm
[18:24] <asac> ubottu: wake up call!
[18:24] <asac> seems quite reponsive ;)
[18:24] <asac> ubottu: @time
[18:24] <asac> !time
[18:24] <asac> @date
[18:24] <asac>  @noew
[18:24] <asac> @now
[18:25] <asac> seems someone busted the logic that does that
[18:25] <BUGabundo> hehehe
[19:05] <fta> back
[19:06] <BUGabundo> fta: did you read what I said about gwibber daily packaging?
[19:06] <fta> yes
[19:07] <BUGabundo> what do you think about it?
[19:07] <BUGabundo> much less work for a packager, if it works
[19:07] <BUGabundo> everytime a user updates his/her system
[19:07] <BUGabundo> it would check the trunk revision
[19:07] <fta> but no, i won't recommand users to use a script that does sudo whatever, it's either a package or you're on your own and bye bye the support from the community
[19:08] <fta> (too long to type in 140 char, grrr)
[19:08] <BUGabundo> ahahahahaaaahahahahahahaah
[19:08] <fta> BUGabundo, i can't probably update my bot to produce a deb for each upstream commit
[19:09] <BUGabundo> np
[19:09] <fta> Mark talked about just that during the intro of the last UDS, but noone seems to be aware of what is behind that
[19:09] <BUGabundo> that's something that LP should do in the future by it self
[19:09] <fta> i doubt it, it won't scale
[19:10] <BUGabundo> you right
[19:10] <BUGabundo> humm
[19:10] <BUGabundo> but let me ask for another opion on that
[19:11] <fta> just the mozilla stuff i have in my ppa would be impossible
[19:12] <fta> add the kernel and openoffice, not to mention gnome, no way
[19:12] <fta> that would mean a huuuuge server farm
[19:13] <fta> i kind of like the idea but it needs $$$$
[19:15] <BUGabundo> I know
[19:16] <BUGabundo> fta:@bugabundo: sudo python whatever ?! no way! ever
[19:16] <BUGabundo> bugabundo:@fta: of course only sudo from trusted sources. if you just got it from bzr, why not?
[19:17] <fta> it's not tracked by dpkg, so it's looking for troubles
[19:17] <fta> it's easy enough to bump the package
[19:17] <BUGabundo> okay, I'll stop promiting that thought
[19:17] <BUGabundo> I have no idea howto package...
[19:17] <BUGabundo> I don't even have gwibber installed from deb
[19:18] <BUGabundo> ever since your version gave me that error about the bump
[19:18] <fta> which error? which bump?
[19:18] <BUGabundo> since I just use the trunk, and update daily, no need for deb
[19:18] <BUGabundo> humm I'll have to check the logs from IRC
[19:18] <BUGabundo> no idea from head right now
[19:18] <fta> maybe it's fine for you but it's not for most of the other users
[19:19] <BUGabundo> I know
[19:20] <BUGabundo> I do this because I know
[19:20] <BUGabundo> and I want to...
[19:20] <BUGabundo> not the best way for other users
[19:20] <BUGabundo> also I tend to go about several branchs just to get what I want
[19:20] <BUGabundo> maybe I should build my own branch on code.LP
[19:21] <BUGabundo> and then just merge from the others what I like.
[19:26] <fta> well, if you can help get what you like committed in trunk, it's even better
[19:30] <BUGabundo> don't other developres just make merge requests?
[19:31] <BUGabundo> isn't that the all idea of distribute coding?
[19:32] <BUGabundo> by jaunty+1 many new first time devs can just branch from ubuntu packages and just submit merge requests with patchs/fixes
[19:32] <BUGabundo> just like gwibber and laconica are working right now
[19:32] <fta> yes, what i meant is vote, and improve either the rationale or the patch itself when it's not welcome as it is but the rationale has been agreed
[19:33] <BUGabundo> I'm not a coder
[19:33] <BUGabundo> I do only tiny bits, and mostly for universaty
[19:33] <BUGabundo> my main area of expertise is as a sysadmin, networking, etc
[19:34] <BUGabundo> oh nice
[19:34] <fta> i'm not a coder either
[19:34] <BUGabundo> ppl filing bugs on the gre prob
[19:34] <BUGabundo> 326312
[19:34] <fta> bug 326312
[19:35] <fta> yeah, we have the fix since this morning, it just needs to be pushed
[19:35] <BUGabundo> yeha I know
[19:35] <fta> i can push it but the fix is not mine
[19:35] <BUGabundo> can you put it as in in progress or soemthing?
[19:36] <fta> sure, i'm bugcontrol
[19:37] <fta> asac, would you do it or should I ?
[19:37] <fta> bug 326312
[19:44] <fta> BUGabundo, please see bug 299863
[19:44] <BUGabundo> yeah!
[19:45] <BUGabundo> I still get that sometimes
[19:45] <BUGabundo> the 1st click doesn't actt
[19:49] <fta> please add a comment, i'll change the status of the bug
[19:51] <BUGabundo> fta: comment added
[19:51] <BUGabundo> set to confirmed
[19:53] <fta> thanks
[19:54] <fta> dtchen, i will test p-a, should I look for something in particular?
[19:55] <fta> (it could not be worse than what i feel today) :P
[19:57] <BUGabundo> are you talking to me?
[19:57]  * BUGabundo does it shows how tired I am?
[20:00] <BUGabundo> fta: bug 313602
[20:06] <BUGabundo> fta: https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-users/msg04758.html
[20:06] <BUGabundo> its making some success
[20:42] <fta> dtchen, no more libpulsecore9 ?
[20:53] <fta> dtchen, my /etc/pulse/default.pa is totally different, should I overwrite it?
[21:14] <fta> 785 upgraded, 46 newly installed, 5 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
[21:14] <fta> Need to get 751MB of archives.
[21:14] <fta> After this operation, 241MB of additional disk space will be used.
[21:14] <fta> hmm
[21:15] <fta> +241MB ??
[21:33] <fta> dtchen, ??
[22:08] <dorgan> is it possible to put jquery inside of a thunderbird extension??