[00:30] How do you mark a bug triaged? Do you have to be a member of a certain team? [00:30] If so, how can I get someone to mark it triaged for me? [00:31] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalctool/+bug/327019 [00:31] Ubuntu bug 327019 in gcalctool "Tan(90°)=-8,618206661e+214" [Undecided,Confirmed] [00:31] yes, u need bugcontrol [00:31] andresmujica, thanks. [00:34] jsmidt, I added the upstream bug watch, and marked as triaged. Thank you for your help [00:35] hggdh, thanks, [04:06] Could somebody close this bug report, it isn't really a bug: [04:06] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/326997 [04:06] Ubuntu bug 326997 in ubuntu "Good News - Jaunty Alpha4 doesn't 'hang' any more" [Undecided,Invalid] [04:08] isnt it already closed? [04:10] looks like it... [05:24] hi how do i mark a bug as closed / fixed ? [05:25] nm [05:30] d-b: fixed is Fix Released [05:30] i think only bug control can mark that status though, so if youre not in it, ask us here [05:31] maco: ok then can you mark another bug for me ? [05:32] yeah [05:34] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/195798 [05:34] Ubuntu bug 195798 in nautilus "Nautilus: Impossible to change case of filename/extension in Windows Share" [Low,Triaged] [05:34] in debian experimental and upstream (samba) a patch has been issued so that the client handling is done properly. i have not tested it yet. [05:35] however, i think this bug should gain a higher level than unknown... perhaps ? [05:36] oh we dont set that [05:37] that is automatically pulled from the upstream bugtrackers [05:37] for ubuntu it is set to Low [05:37] ok. [05:37] if it says Unknown it means debian hasn't set an importance level [05:38] maco: um.. its assigned no ?'important' [05:38] "Severity: important" [05:38] in samba is "normal" [05:39] perhaps it takes some time to get the info [05:44] it can take up to 24hr [05:45] its also possible that launchpad doesnt know quite how to map their importance to its importance [05:45] ex: when debian archives a bug it could be one of two things A) it's fixed B) they gave up [05:45] we use Fix Released and Invalid [05:45] they just use Archived [05:46] so all of their Fix Released and It's Old And Reporter Has Gone Ghost So Nevermind are both shown as "Fix Released" in LP [05:47] you are effenber0x0 right ? [05:47] sorry misread it [06:30] Isn't there a way to set the status of a bug to needs more info? [06:30] jsmidt: Incomplete [06:30] jmarsden, thanks. [06:30] np [06:33] good morning [06:48] dholbach, your harvest updates on fedora patches? [06:48] Anyway it could update on other distros like opensuse and maybe upstream pateches as they come in? [06:49] Sorry, I worded things wierd: can you get patch updates from other distros and upstream with harvest? [06:50] jsmidt: everybody can write a script that generates a .csv file from something and get it added to harvest :) [06:50] jsmidt: that's the nice thing about harvest [06:50] I have no plans at the moment to write any script, but improve harvest itself - I'm a bit busy with all kinds of stuff right now [06:51] Yeah, I'm sure it would be work. But in principle it could be done? [06:51] Is there an easy way to find where I would get new patch info from opensuse? [06:52] I have no idea how opensuse does their patch thing [06:52] Or some bugzilla based upstream project? [06:52] Okay [07:17] dholbach, good news! I found it: http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/patch.py [07:17] Now I just need to figure out how to get a script to update with new patches as they come in. [07:19] bug 310250 [07:19] Launchpad bug 310250 in ltsp "ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/310250 [07:21] why doesn't ubottu respond in private message? [07:22] it's sooooo much faster to ask ubottu for the full link to a bug report than to manually type it, or to notice that the emails LP sends out have a link in the footer. :P [07:24] um just a question https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apachetop/+bug/294599 shows a apachetop debdiff is there something else required (just out of interested) before it is commited (just watching / wanting to know) [07:24] Ubuntu bug 294599 in apachetop "*** buffer overflow detected ***: apachetop terminated" [Unknown,Fix released] [07:33] d-b: yes, ubuntu-universe-sponsors needs to be subscribed, which i've just done [07:33] Hobbsee: i'm trying to use the patch (as i would like to run said software) but i can't build ! [07:33] (even without patch) [07:34] using autotools stuff or pbuilder? [07:35] ./configure ... and make atm [07:35] maybe there's magic in the packaging? [07:35] try building the actual package [07:35] * Hobbsee notes the config.* stuff should be removed from that diff, too [07:36] * Hobbsee also notes that should be sent to debian. [07:37] * d-b Hobbsee me tests [07:37] its probably going to work due to the compile tho (on debian) [07:37] yeah it works. [07:38] apachetop isn't hardened in debian lenny. [07:41] d-b, don't bother trying to manually compile. [07:41] Ryan52: i gave up ^^ sure but i can't use his patch using just the patch file and p1 ^^ [07:42] Hobbsee, and the other changes should use a patch management system. [07:44] Ryan52: i meant -> i can compile the original from ubuntu using apt-get -b source apachetop but i can't get his patch to work (if i apt-get source it and then do dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -b [07:45] ah, ok. [07:59] um. same result on using hardening wrapper on debian (crash) what kind of a bug would i submit tho ? [08:01] does Ubuntu's package use hardening wrapper? [08:01] Ryan52: yeah by default you guys seem to use it. [08:01] (at least for this) [08:02] there's no debdiff between debian and ubuntu...they're the same. [08:02] Ryan52: no i meant your compile options [08:03] did Ubuntu do a distro wide rebuild with hardening-wrapper on or something? 0.o [08:04] Ryan52: apparently ?.... [08:04] o noez. [08:04] rofl. [08:13] ok i submited bug to debian. [08:34] d-b, that bug you reported in Debian is actually different than what you made it seem to be :) [08:35] the bug isn't that apachetop doesn't work with hardening-wrapper. [08:35] that's just a side affect of the real bug, which is a that it has a buffer overflow problem. [08:35] (I think) [08:36] Ryan52: oh yeah sure. i admit that -> my brain is dead atm. [08:36] the bug is that the limit is to low and set to 128 instead of something more meaningful as i understand it [08:36] ya. [08:37] well, sort of. [08:37] oh ? [08:38] i got my understanding from the diff at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309968&action=diff [08:41] ah, ok. [08:41] btw is this package actually maintained ? last release was 2005... [08:43] and last upload to Debian was 2008-07-03. so ya, in Debian it is. and therefor Ubuntu, too. [09:17] asac: re: bug 286859 i don't have the card anymore. but i have a different card in my new thinkpad that doesn't work at all to which i'll give you debug output once i get around to it. sorry for delaying this [09:17] Launchpad bug 286859 in network-manager "[0.7] [3G] "PIN secret invalid" even though PIN is correct" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/286859 [09:21] Ryan52: i meant upstream... [09:21] danage: thanks [09:22] d-b, ya. [09:22] its the tickets are full of spam and the source not changed in 3 years [09:22] its just that* [09:22] o [09:45] asac: i'll file a separate bug about it [09:50] danage: ok. please subscribe me so the bugmail gets in high-prio mailbo [09:50] x [09:52] asac: will do, thanks === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [10:59] ogasawara: ping === LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox [15:08] Boo [16:01] would you consider this a wishlist bug or a brainstorm idea? Bug #319146 [16:01] Launchpad bug 319146 in update-manager "When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information." [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/319146 === Afwas_ is now known as Afwas [16:02] savvas: a good idea, would you be interessted in writing a wiki page that we can link to? [16:02] savvas: or a text document maybe? === ogra_ is now known as ogra [16:05] mvo: should I take the bug description and wiki-fy it? I've made the bug report really detailed :) What should I include for a wiki page and.. which title to use? [16:07] savvas: there is already support in update-manager to show a dialog that the distro is no longer supported, I was thinking that it should come up with a link in addtion to explain about why it is end-of-life, what this means and how to upgrade [16:08] savvas: I was wondering whether is it possible to change the status of your bug report to confirmed? [16:08] savvas: the goal is of course to make sure the regular method of upgrades works again, the fact that it does not currently is a bug :/ [16:09] mangilimic: it is possible, but the reporter should never confirm his own bugs [16:10] mangilimic: hey! :) since mvo is the developer of update-manager, I think we have the green light to set it back to confirmed :) [16:11] savvas: yeah, I think that is fine, I need to look into the details and will comment on them, please prod me if I haven't done that by tomorrow :) [16:12] mvo: I see what you mean, a page explaining the end-of-life status and possible solutions, I'll get right on to a simple text document, I'll attach it as a comment on that bug report! [16:12] charlie-tca: thank you for this hint. So it was better to ask mvo instead of savvas! I apologize. [16:13] np, Go ahead and confirm it. [16:13] mangilimic: set it to confirmed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/319146/+editstatus [16:13] Ubuntu bug 319146 in update-manager "When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information." [Undecided,Invalid] [16:13] thanks savvas and mangilimic [16:13] savvas: thank you! :) [16:13] mvo: you are welcome [16:34] BUGabundo: did you need something earlier when you pinged? [16:36] yeah ogasawara [16:36] 2 things [16:36] james_w: ping. Can you help me with bug 304249 (I like to get the fix in Jaunty before feature freeze.) [16:36] one should be quick [16:36] Launchpad bug 304249 in winff "[jaunty] Presets should be updated because the ffmpeg version in Ubuntu is newer than in Debian" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/304249 [16:37] right side (2) usb ports the mouse is slugish [16:37] Elbrus: sure, sorry I haven't got round to sponsoring it [16:37] works ok on the left side ports ogasawara [16:37] BUGabundo: bug # for that? [16:37] old bug already happened from time to time on ibex, new on jaunty [16:37] not yet [16:37] wanted to know what I needed [16:37] haven't restarted yet, just to be sure I had all logs [16:38] james_w: I think the change is rather small now (with the latest version) [16:38] BUGabundo: when you file, attach lsusb info, also dmesg output for when it's working and when it's sluggish might be interesting [16:38] BUGabundo: then of course the usual, lspci -vnvn info and kernel version [16:39] BUGabundo: have you tested any other usb devices with those ports? [16:39] 2nd bug: hibernate/suspend/resume [16:39] suspend broken for long time, hibernate was working REALLY well up until last week [16:40] really fast resume (less then 25 secs) [16:40] now broken... [16:40] will not resume [16:40] colenting data for bug 1 [16:40] BUGabundo: is this on Jaunty? [16:40] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 (Timeout) [16:40] jaunty [16:40] Linux blubug 2.6.28-6-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 30 15:35:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux [16:41] BUGabundo: just curious if apports detect the failure to resume? if so, it should file a bug automatically for you [16:42] BUGabundo: and I assume if you boot into the previous kernel it's back to normal? [16:42] doesn't detect [16:43] I have to force poweroff or alt-sysreq REISUB [16:43] screen is blanck [16:43] changing to TTys does nothing ogasawara [16:44] BUGabundo: when you file the bug (if you haven't already) definitely not the most recent version of the kernel where this was working and the version which caused the regression [16:44] s/not/note/ [16:45] ogasawara: is it too late in the dev cycle to request that an out-of-tree driver be merged? [16:46] ogasawara: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/327253 [16:46] Ubuntu bug 327253 in linux "mouse is slugish on some usb ports" [Undecided,New] [16:46] adding rest of logs [16:46] it was OK with -6 too [16:46] maco: might still be able to make it - if you can, file a bug with the request [16:46] but now doesn't work [16:47] BUGabundo: so it wasn't a kernel update which broke it? [16:47] nope [16:48] ogasawara: -5 and -4 already had resume from suspend not working [16:48] and 50% for resume from hibernation [16:49] one week and half ago resume from hibernate was 200% nice ... really fast resume [16:49] BUGabundo: with -6 correct [16:49] when it reached desktop, no more disk usage, so it was perfect in every sense [16:49] Linux blubug 2.6.28-6-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 30 15:35:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux [16:49] this one... more or less any extra update for -6 [16:50] all logs filed to bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/327253 [16:50] Ubuntu bug 327253 in linux "mouse is slugish on some usb ports" [Undecided,New] [16:51] james_w: do you think it needs work from my side, or do I just have to wait till you have time to look at it? [16:52] ogasawara: done... now for resume [16:52] ogasawara: for bug 215604 there's a driver now that works for photo mode and is a bit slow on video mode. the developer's been working with the community to improve it for the last few months [16:52] how to log/debug? [16:52] Launchpad bug 215604 in cheese "Genesys Logic Webcam 05e3:0503 Not Working" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215604 [16:52] maco I'm affected by that one two [16:52] yes [16:52] i know [16:52] really nice driver now... but need a suport from V4L [16:52] thank you for telling me he'd released a new tarball [16:53] I won't be made into the kernel in time for jaunty [16:53] acording to Nol [16:53] lots of changes yet [16:53] oh ok [16:53] well i was guessing he meant upstream kernel [16:53] and nol said he was going to revert it yet again [16:53] oh [16:53] ok nevermind then [16:54] i heard from dtchen that linus looks more favorably upon patches which major distros have already reviewed/accepted to accept into the mainline kernel [16:54] due to failure and crash of amsn and something else [16:54] WITHOUT v4l [16:54] humm [16:54] well the old version was stable enough for me [16:54] that one "could" make its way into the kernel [16:54] which reminds me... [16:55] back [16:55] pidgin crashed [16:55] as I was said... [16:55] the changes the Nol is trying to make so that the driver work with v4l [16:55] argh. i attached the patch that made my sound work in ubuntu to a bug report in upstream alsa and they havent looked at it. [16:56] have failed... and he made a new internal version that would separate it from the kernel [16:56] but crashed his test bed [16:56] is it currently only v4l2? [16:56] BUGabundo: are you able to ssh into the machine after it fails to resume from hibernate? [16:56] the stable version (old) is v4l2 only [16:56] and work some what ok.... no skype [16:56] never tried it [16:56] I can test it if you need [16:56] * maco grumbles about skype being proprietary anyway [16:57] with new version skype detects my webcam maco.... but then won't work, as I'm 64 bits [16:57] did you try on 32bit? [16:57] I just run 64bits on this laptop [16:57] I could try a daily iso [16:57] install 32bit on a spare hard drive and see what happens? [16:58] will give it a try , and post to the forum [16:58] anything else ogasawara? [16:59] BUGabundo: well I'd assume if you didn't make and kernel updates, and are now experiencing this regression, it's likely another package causing the issue [17:00] nvidia driver? [17:00] I'm using nv since Friday due to bug 326344 [17:00] BUGabundo: ahh, if it's nvidia it might be a known issue [17:01] Launchpad bug 326344 in xorg-server "compiz/kwin freezes on login as of xorg-server 1.5.99.902-0ubuntu2" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/326344 [17:01] BUGabundo: bug 324895 [17:01] and I also have the webcam driver that maco mentioned [17:01] Launchpad bug 324895 in xserver-xorg-video-nv "XServer hungs after resuming in a Lenovo t61" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/324895 [17:01] * BUGabundo checking bug [17:01] BUGabundo: which Nvidia card do you have? [17:02] geforce 8400m G [17:02] one year old card [17:03] BUGabundo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Backtracing - might be worth investigating if you can capture a stack trace as Bryce mentions in that bug [17:03] BUGabundo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Backtracing - might be worth investigating if you can capture a stack trace as Bryce mentions in that bug [17:04] as I was saying [17:04] one year old card [17:04] ooh right....i need to rig up a usb webcam with my other laptop and cheese to try to take a pic of a kernel panic for ogasawara... [17:04] stupid camera's charger had to go and grow legs [17:04] heh [17:05] plus, when it fails to allow me access to the screen, I tried to go to tty, and login there [17:05] but had no disk usage [17:08] Elbrus: sorry, got pulled away to something else [17:08] Elbrus: your patch looks fine. My only question is with the "cp" you added to debian/rules [17:09] now on xchat [17:09] james_w: np [17:09] pidgin is crash far too much today [17:09] Elbrus: there is no corresponding change to the clean rule, so your package will fail to build twice in a row [17:09] bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/317897 and a few others [17:09] Ubuntu bug 317897 in pulseaudio "pidgin crash with Pulse Audio" [Undecided,New] [17:10] james_w: why will it fail? the preset.xml file just gets replaced right? [17:10] Elbrus: i.e. first build will cp to debian/presets.xml, the clean doesn't remove it, and then the second build will fail as the target exists [17:10] err, no, you are right of course [17:10] it does exist the first time around as well. So I should put a rm before the cp? [17:11] no, it's ok [17:15] maco, does the webcam work for u ? [17:15] with the new driver? [17:22] er the answer to BUGabundo was "ys [17:24] Elbrus: uploaded, sorry it took so long [17:28] back [17:28] finally fixed wifi [17:29] BUGabundo: yes the webcam works for me [17:29] i can take photos just dandy...hence the new identi.ca av [17:30] video...it only caught like 3 seconds out of 15-20 seconds of recording, and they weren't even consecutive seconds [17:31] i give up on pidgin [17:32] it cant stay connect for more then a few minutes [17:36] james_w: np and thanks === asac_ is now known as asac [17:52] ahh finally tracked down what was crashing pidgin (this time) [17:52] an new account plugin [17:52] to see how long it lasts [17:57] ogasawara: going to try hibernated followed by ssh [17:57] byr [18:11] ogasawara: it was really X [18:11] failing to resume [18:11] got traceback [18:11] uploading now [18:11] BUGabundo: if the stack trace is not the same as in that bug, you should open a new one [18:14] I opened a new one with apport [18:14] then mark it as dupe [18:14] let me check if it is similar [18:15] doesn't look the same [18:15] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/327301 [18:15] Ubuntu bug 327301 in xorg "xserver fails to resume (dup-of: 324895)" [Undecided,New] [18:15] Ubuntu bug 324895 in xserver-xorg-video-nv "XServer hungs after resuming in a Lenovo t61" [Undecided,New] [18:19] be back in a few min [18:45] Are there any kernel devs in here that could help me troubleshoot intel wireless connectivity? Connecting to WPA Enterprise SSID Hidden with 2.6.24-23 always fails, but with 2.6.24-22 it always succeeds. Bugreport and syslogs for failed and successful connection attempts are at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317976 . Thanks for your time! [18:45] Ubuntu bug 317976 in linux "Latest Kernel updates (2.6.24-23) break WPA Enterprise Hidden SSID on iwl3945 in Hardy" [Undecided,New] [19:22] Hi there [19:25] thomasdelbeke: Hi [19:26] Hi there MrKanister [19:26] That was the landlord harrassing me [19:27] sorry 'bout that [19:27] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irssi/+bug/327213 [19:27] Ubuntu bug 327213 in irssi "stale nickname ; contains illegal characters, connection reset" [Undecided,New] [19:27] I posted a new bug [19:27] I fear it may be too much again [19:28] but I think the last gdb could contain good data [19:28] no? [19:29] also valgrind ... [19:29] !pastebin [19:29] pastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. The Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu.com (make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic) [19:30] http://paste.ubuntu.com/116162/ [19:30] what do you think? [19:30] refile reduced? [19:36] http://paste.ubuntu.com/116164/ [19:37] I'd like to add information to Bug #323823. I'm not a member in the launchpad so maybe somebody here can take a note. [19:37] Launchpad bug 323823 in acpi "Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323823 [19:37] thomasdelbeke: hmmm...I am not that good at evaluating valgrinds and backtraces, but I think the more information you give the better [19:38] ok thanks [19:38] I leave it like this then? [19:39] sorry for my late answer, I assumed you write my name so I would have benennotified :) [19:39] thomasdelbeke: Yes, I would leave it that way. If someone needs more or other information he/she will ask you [19:39] sorry MrKanister [19:40] thomasdelbeke: np [19:40] thanks a lot [19:40] cu [19:40] bye [19:41] the same problem reported in the Bug #323823 started in my gutsy after updating to the kernel 2.6.22-16. I can not use the latest kernel because of the bug. Running 15 now w/o problems. That's why I guess the bug came with the last kernel update. [19:41] Launchpad bug 323823 in acpi "Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323823 [21:20] sigh. Another "shoot and run" :-( [21:59] #ubuntu-dk-bugjam [21:59] ups. typo - sorry for the noise :-X [22:41] Are there any kernel devs in here that could help me troubleshoot intel wireless connectivity? Connecting to WPA Enterprise SSID Hidden with 2.6.24-23 always fails, but with 2.6.24-22 it always succeeds. Bugreport and syslogs for failed and successful connection attempts are at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317976 . Thanks for your time! [22:41] Ubuntu bug 317976 in linux "Latest Kernel updates (2.6.24-23) break WPA Enterprise Hidden SSID on iwl3945 in Hardy" [Undecided,New] [22:50] jbuncher, Interesting... On Jaunty with hidden SSID I'm seeing the same issue with iwl3945 [22:51] IntuitiveNipple: Yeah, I haven't tried intrepid, since I don't have a laptop with that installed. [22:52] I'm not sure what kernel version is used in the Hardy installation here (the disk is out of the PC right now) but that boots okay. [22:52] IntuitiveNipple: Would you have any idea as to what specific change occured that would cause that? [22:53] I would if i had the other disk connected, but right now I'm moving the laptop to a 400G drive and currently installing and moving stuff over [22:58] jbuncher: Please add Minimal information from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies. That's all I know. [23:04] joumetal: Thanks, I'll do that as soon as possible.