[00:30] <jsmidt> How do you mark a bug triaged?  Do you have to be a member of a certain team?
[00:30] <jsmidt> If so, how can I get someone to mark it triaged for me?
[00:31] <jsmidt> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalctool/+bug/327019
[00:31] <andresmujica> yes, u need bugcontrol
[00:31] <jsmidt> andresmujica, thanks.
[00:34] <hggdh> jsmidt, I added the upstream bug watch, and marked as triaged. Thank you for your help
[00:35] <jsmidt> hggdh, thanks,
[04:06] <jsmidt> Could somebody close this bug report, it isn't really a bug:
[04:06] <jsmidt> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/326997
[04:08] <danbhfive> isnt it already closed?
[04:10] <maco> looks like it...
[05:24] <d-b> hi how do i mark a bug as closed / fixed ?
[05:25] <d-b> nm
[05:30] <maco> d-b: fixed is Fix Released
[05:30] <maco> i think only bug control can mark that status though, so if youre not in it, ask us here
[05:31] <d-b> maco: ok then can you mark another bug for me ?
[05:32] <maco> yeah
[05:34] <d-b> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/195798
[05:34] <d-b> in debian experimental and upstream (samba) a patch has been issued so that the client handling is done properly. i have not tested it yet.
[05:35] <d-b> however, i think this bug should gain a higher level than unknown... perhaps ?
[05:36] <maco> oh we dont set that
[05:37] <maco> that is automatically pulled from the upstream bugtrackers
[05:37] <maco> for ubuntu it is set to Low
[05:37] <d-b> ok.
[05:37] <maco> if it says Unknown it means debian hasn't set an importance level
[05:38] <d-b> maco: um.. its assigned no ?'important'
[05:38] <d-b> "Severity: important"
[05:38] <d-b> in samba is "normal"
[05:39] <d-b> perhaps it takes some time to get the info
[05:44] <maco> it can take up to 24hr
[05:45] <maco> its also possible that launchpad doesnt know quite how to map their importance to its importance
[05:45] <maco> ex: when debian archives a bug it could be one of two things A) it's fixed B) they gave up
[05:45] <maco> we use Fix Released and Invalid
[05:45] <maco> they just use Archived
[05:46] <maco> so all of their Fix Released and It's Old And Reporter Has Gone Ghost So Nevermind are both shown as "Fix Released" in LP
[05:47] <d-b> you are effenber0x0 right ?
[05:47] <d-b> sorry misread it
[06:30] <jsmidt> Isn't there a way to set the status of a bug to needs more info?
[06:30] <jmarsden> jsmidt: Incomplete
[06:30] <jsmidt> jmarsden, thanks.
[06:30] <jmarsden> np
[06:33] <dholbach> good morning
[06:48] <jsmidt> dholbach, your harvest updates on fedora patches?
[06:48] <jsmidt> Anyway it could update on other distros like opensuse and maybe upstream pateches as they come in?
[06:49] <jsmidt> Sorry, I worded things wierd: can you get patch updates from other distros and upstream with harvest?
[06:50] <dholbach> jsmidt: everybody can write a script that generates a .csv file from something and get it added to harvest :)
[06:50] <dholbach> jsmidt: that's the nice thing about harvest
[06:50] <dholbach> I have no plans at the moment to write any script, but improve harvest itself - I'm a bit busy with all kinds of stuff right now
[06:51] <jsmidt> Yeah, I'm sure it would be work.  But in principle it could be done?
[06:51] <jsmidt> Is there an easy way to find where I would get new patch info from opensuse?
[06:52] <dholbach> I have no idea how opensuse does their patch thing
[06:52] <jsmidt> Or some bugzilla based upstream project?
[06:52] <jsmidt> Okay
[07:17] <jsmidt> dholbach, good news! I found it: http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/patch.py
[07:17] <jsmidt> Now I just need to figure out how to get a script to update with new patches as they come in.
[07:19] <Ryan52> bug 310250
[07:21] <Ryan52> why doesn't ubottu respond in private message?
[07:22] <Ryan52> it's sooooo much faster to ask ubottu for the full link to a bug report than to manually type it, or to notice that the emails LP sends out have a link in the footer. :P
[07:24] <d-b> um just a question https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apachetop/+bug/294599 shows a apachetop debdiff is there something else required (just out of interested) before it is commited (just watching / wanting to know)
[07:33] <Hobbsee> d-b: yes, ubuntu-universe-sponsors needs to be subscribed, which i've just done
[07:33] <d-b> Hobbsee: i'm trying to use the patch (as i would like to run said software) but i can't build !
[07:33] <d-b> (even without patch)
[07:34] <maco> using autotools stuff or pbuilder?
[07:35] <d-b> ./configure ... and make atm
[07:35] <maco> maybe there's magic in the packaging?
[07:35] <maco> try building the actual package
[07:35]  * Hobbsee notes the config.* stuff should be removed from that diff, too
[07:36]  * Hobbsee also notes that should be sent to debian.
[07:37]  * d-b Hobbsee me tests
[07:37] <d-b> its probably going to work due to the compile tho (on debian)
[07:37] <d-b> yeah it works.
[07:38] <d-b> apachetop isn't hardened in debian lenny.
[07:41] <Ryan52> d-b, don't bother trying to manually compile.
[07:41] <d-b> Ryan52: i gave up ^^ sure but i can't use his patch using just the patch file and p1 ^^
[07:42] <Ryan52> Hobbsee, and the other changes should use a patch management system.
[07:44] <d-b> Ryan52: i meant -> i can compile the original from ubuntu using apt-get -b source apachetop but i can't get his patch to work (if i apt-get source it and then do dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -b
[07:45] <Ryan52> ah, ok.
[07:59] <d-b> um. same result on using hardening wrapper on debian (crash) what kind of a bug would i submit tho ?
[08:01] <Ryan52> does Ubuntu's package use hardening wrapper?
[08:01] <d-b> Ryan52: yeah by default you guys seem to use it.
[08:01] <d-b> (at least for this)
[08:02] <Ryan52> there's no debdiff between debian and ubuntu...they're the same.
[08:02] <d-b> Ryan52: no i meant your compile options
[08:03] <Ryan52> did Ubuntu do a distro wide rebuild with hardening-wrapper on or something? 0.o
[08:04] <d-b> Ryan52: apparently ?....
[08:04] <Ryan52> o noez.
[08:04] <d-b> rofl.
[08:13] <d-b> ok i submited bug to debian.
[08:34] <Ryan52> d-b, that bug you reported in Debian is actually different than what you made it seem to be :)
[08:35] <Ryan52> the bug isn't that apachetop doesn't work with hardening-wrapper.
[08:35] <Ryan52> that's just a side affect of the real bug, which is a that it has a buffer overflow problem.
[08:35] <Ryan52> (I think)
[08:36] <d-b> Ryan52: oh yeah sure. i admit that -> my brain is dead atm.
[08:36] <d-b> the bug is that the limit is to low and set to 128 instead of something more meaningful as i understand it
[08:36] <Ryan52> ya.
[08:37] <Ryan52> well, sort of.
[08:37] <d-b> oh ?
[08:38] <d-b> i got my understanding from the diff at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309968&action=diff
[08:41] <Ryan52> ah, ok.
[08:41] <d-b> btw is this package actually maintained ? last release was 2005...
[08:43] <Ryan52> and last upload to Debian was 2008-07-03. so ya, in Debian it is. and therefor Ubuntu, too.
[09:17] <danage> asac: re: bug 286859 i don't have the card anymore. but i have a different card in my new thinkpad that doesn't work at all to which i'll give you debug output once i get around to it. sorry for delaying this
[09:21] <d-b> Ryan52: i meant upstream...
[09:21] <asac> danage: thanks
[09:22] <Ryan52> d-b, ya.
[09:22] <d-b> its the tickets are full of spam and the source not changed in 3 years
[09:22] <d-b> its just that*
[09:22] <Ryan52> o
[09:45] <danage> asac: i'll file a separate bug about it
[09:50] <asac> danage: ok. please subscribe me so the bugmail gets in high-prio mailbo
[09:50] <asac> x
[09:52] <danage> asac: will do, thanks
[10:59] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: ping
[15:08] <bddebian> Boo
[16:01] <savvas> would you consider this a wishlist bug or a brainstorm idea? Bug #319146
[16:02] <mvo> savvas: a good idea, would you be interessted in writing a wiki page that we can link to?
[16:02] <mvo> savvas: or a text document maybe?
[16:05] <savvas> mvo: should I take the bug description and wiki-fy it? I've made the bug report really detailed :) What should I include for a wiki page and.. which title to use?
[16:07] <mvo> savvas: there is already support in update-manager to show a dialog that the distro is no longer supported, I was thinking that it should come up with a link in addtion to explain about why it is end-of-life, what this means and how to upgrade
[16:08] <mangilimic> savvas: I was wondering whether is it possible to change the status of your bug report to confirmed?
[16:08] <mvo> savvas: the goal is of course to make sure the regular method of upgrades works again, the fact that it does not currently is a bug :/
[16:09] <charlie-tca> mangilimic: it is possible, but the reporter should never confirm his own bugs
[16:10] <savvas> mangilimic: hey! :) since mvo is the developer of update-manager, I think we have the green light to set it back to confirmed :)
[16:11] <mvo> savvas: yeah, I think that is fine, I need to look into the details and will comment on them, please prod me if I haven't done that by tomorrow :)
[16:12] <savvas> mvo: I see what you mean, a page explaining the end-of-life status and possible solutions, I'll get right on to a simple text document, I'll attach it as a comment on that bug report!
[16:12] <mangilimic> charlie-tca: thank you for this hint. So it was better to ask mvo instead of savvas! I apologize.
[16:13] <charlie-tca> np, Go ahead and confirm it.
[16:13] <savvas> mangilimic: set it to confirmed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/319146/+editstatus
[16:13] <mvo> thanks savvas and mangilimic
[16:13] <mangilimic> savvas: thank you! :)
[16:13] <mangilimic> mvo: you are welcome
[16:34] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: did you need something earlier when you pinged?
[16:36] <BUGabundo> yeah ogasawara
[16:36] <BUGabundo> 2 things
[16:36] <Elbrus> james_w: ping. Can you help me with bug 304249 (I like to get the fix in Jaunty before feature freeze.)
[16:36] <BUGabundo> one should be quick
[16:37] <BUGabundo> right side (2) usb ports the mouse is slugish
[16:37] <james_w> Elbrus: sure, sorry I haven't got round to sponsoring it
[16:37] <BUGabundo> works ok on the left side ports ogasawara
[16:37] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: bug # for that?
[16:37] <BUGabundo> old bug already happened from time to time on ibex, new on jaunty
[16:37] <BUGabundo> not yet
[16:37] <BUGabundo> wanted to know what I needed
[16:37] <BUGabundo> haven't restarted yet, just to be sure I had all logs
[16:38] <Elbrus> james_w: I think the change is rather small now (with the latest version)
[16:38] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: when you file, attach lsusb info, also dmesg output for when it's working and when it's sluggish might be interesting
[16:38] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: then of course the usual, lspci -vnvn info and kernel version
[16:39] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: have you tested any other usb devices with those ports?
[16:39] <BUGabundo> 2nd bug: hibernate/suspend/resume
[16:39] <BUGabundo> suspend broken for long time, hibernate was working REALLY well up until last week
[16:40] <BUGabundo> really fast resume (less then 25 secs)
[16:40] <BUGabundo> now broken...
[16:40] <BUGabundo> will not resume
[16:40] <BUGabundo> colenting data for bug 1
[16:40] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: is this on Jaunty?
[16:40] <BUGabundo> jaunty
[16:40] <BUGabundo> Linux blubug 2.6.28-6-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 30 15:35:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[16:41] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: just curious if apports detect the failure to resume?  if so, it should file a bug automatically for you
[16:42] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: and I assume if you boot into the previous kernel it's back to normal?
[16:42] <BUGabundo> doesn't detect
[16:43] <BUGabundo> I have to force poweroff or alt-sysreq REISUB
[16:43] <BUGabundo> screen is blanck
[16:43] <BUGabundo> changing to TTys does nothing ogasawara
[16:44] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: when you file the bug (if you haven't already) definitely not the most recent version of the kernel where this was working and the version which caused the regression
[16:44] <ogasawara> s/not/note/
[16:45] <maco> ogasawara: is it too late in the dev cycle to request that an out-of-tree driver be merged?
[16:46] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/327253
[16:46] <BUGabundo> adding rest of logs
[16:46] <BUGabundo> it was OK with -6 too
[16:46] <ogasawara> maco:  might still be able to make it - if you can, file a bug with the request
[16:46] <BUGabundo> but now doesn't work
[16:47] <ogasawara> BUGabundo:  so it wasn't a kernel update which broke it?
[16:47] <BUGabundo> nope
[16:48] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: -5  and -4 already had resume from suspend not working
[16:48] <BUGabundo> and 50% for resume from hibernation
[16:49] <BUGabundo> one week and half ago resume from hibernate was 200% nice ... really fast resume
[16:49] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: with -6 correct
[16:49] <BUGabundo> when it reached desktop, no more disk usage, so it was perfect in every sense
[16:49] <BUGabundo> Linux blubug 2.6.28-6-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 30 15:35:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[16:49] <BUGabundo> this one... more or less any extra update for -6
[16:50] <BUGabundo> all logs filed to bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/327253
[16:51] <Elbrus> james_w: do you think it needs work from my side, or do I just have to wait till you have time to look at it?
[16:52] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: done... now for resume
[16:52] <maco> ogasawara: for bug 215604 there's a driver now that works for photo mode and is a bit slow on video mode. the developer's been working with the community to improve it for the last few months
[16:52] <BUGabundo> how to log/debug?
[16:52] <BUGabundo> maco I'm affected by that one two
[16:52] <maco> yes
[16:52] <maco> i know
[16:52] <BUGabundo> really nice driver now... but need a suport from V4L
[16:52] <maco> thank you for telling me he'd released a new tarball
[16:53] <BUGabundo> I won't be made into the kernel in time for jaunty
[16:53] <BUGabundo> acording to Nol
[16:53] <BUGabundo> lots of changes yet
[16:53] <maco> oh ok
[16:53] <maco> well i was guessing he meant upstream kernel
[16:53] <BUGabundo> and nol said he was going to revert it yet again
[16:53] <maco> oh
[16:53] <maco> ok nevermind then
[16:54] <maco> i heard from dtchen that linus looks more favorably upon patches which major distros have already reviewed/accepted to accept into the mainline kernel
[16:54] <BUGabundo> due to failure and crash of amsn and something else
[16:54] <BUGabundo> WITHOUT v4l
[16:54] <BUGabundo> humm
[16:54] <BUGabundo> well the old version was stable enough for me
[16:54] <BUGabundo> that one "could" make its way into the kernel
[16:54] <maco> which reminds me...
[16:55] <BUGabundo> back
[16:55] <BUGabundo> pidgin crashed
[16:55] <BUGabundo> as I was said...
[16:55] <BUGabundo> the changes the Nol is trying to make so that the driver work with v4l
[16:55] <maco> argh. i attached the patch that made my sound work in ubuntu to a bug report in upstream alsa and they havent looked at it.
[16:56] <BUGabundo> have failed... and he made a new internal version that would separate it from the kernel
[16:56] <BUGabundo> but crashed his test bed
[16:56] <maco> is it currently only v4l2?
[16:56] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: are you able to ssh into the machine after it fails to resume from hibernate?
[16:56] <BUGabundo> the stable version (old) is v4l2 only
[16:56] <BUGabundo> and work some what ok.... no skype
[16:56] <BUGabundo> never tried it
[16:56] <BUGabundo> I can test it if you need
[16:56]  * maco grumbles about skype being proprietary anyway
[16:57] <BUGabundo> with new version skype detects my webcam maco.... but then won't work, as I'm 64 bits
[16:57] <maco> did you try on 32bit?
[16:57] <BUGabundo> I just run 64bits on this laptop
[16:57] <BUGabundo> I could try a daily iso
[16:57] <maco> install 32bit on a spare hard drive and see what happens?
[16:58] <BUGabundo> will give it a try , and post to the forum
[16:58] <BUGabundo> anything else ogasawara?
[16:59] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: well I'd assume if you didn't make and kernel updates, and are now experiencing this regression, it's likely another package causing the issue
[17:00] <BUGabundo> nvidia driver?
[17:00] <BUGabundo> I'm using nv since Friday due to bug 326344
[17:00] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: ahh, if it's nvidia it might be a known issue
[17:01] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: bug 324895
[17:01] <BUGabundo> and I also have the webcam driver that maco mentioned
[17:01]  * BUGabundo checking bug
[17:01] <ogasawara> BUGabundo:  which Nvidia card do you have?
[17:02] <BUGabundo> geforce 8400m G
[17:02] <BUGabundo> one year old card
[17:03] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Backtracing - might be worth investigating if you can capture a stack trace as Bryce mentions in that bug
[17:03] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Backtracing - might be worth investigating if you can capture a stack trace as Bryce mentions in that bug
[17:04] <BUGabundo> as I was saying
[17:04] <BUGabundo> one year old card
[17:04] <maco> ooh right....i need to rig up a usb webcam with my other laptop and cheese to try to take a pic of a kernel panic for ogasawara...
[17:04] <maco> stupid camera's charger had to go and grow legs
[17:04] <ogasawara> heh
[17:05] <BUGabundo> plus, when it fails to allow me access to the screen, I tried to go to tty, and login there
[17:05] <BUGabundo> but had no disk usage
[17:08] <james_w> Elbrus: sorry, got pulled away to something else
[17:08] <james_w> Elbrus: your patch looks fine. My only question is with the "cp" you added to debian/rules
[17:09] <BUGabundo> now on xchat
[17:09] <Elbrus> james_w: np
[17:09] <BUGabundo> pidgin is crash far too much today
[17:09] <james_w> Elbrus: there is no corresponding change to the clean rule, so your package will fail to build twice in a row
[17:09] <BUGabundo> bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/317897 and a few others
[17:10] <Elbrus> james_w: why will it fail? the preset.xml file just gets replaced right?
[17:10] <james_w> Elbrus: i.e. first build will cp to debian/presets.xml, the clean doesn't remove it, and then the second build will fail as the target exists
[17:10] <james_w> err, no, you are right of course
[17:10] <Elbrus> it does exist the first time around as well. So I should put a rm before the cp?
[17:11] <james_w> no, it's ok
[17:15] <BUGabundo> maco, does the webcam work for u ?
[17:15] <BUGabundo> with the new driver?
[17:22] <maco> er the answer to BUGabundo was "ys
[17:24] <james_w> Elbrus: uploaded, sorry it took so long
[17:28] <BUGabundo> back
[17:28] <BUGabundo> finally fixed wifi
[17:29] <maco> BUGabundo: yes the webcam works for me
[17:29] <maco> i can take photos just dandy...hence the new identi.ca av
[17:30] <maco> video...it only caught like 3 seconds out of 15-20 seconds of recording, and they weren't even consecutive seconds
[17:31] <BUGabundo> i give up on pidgin
[17:32] <BUGabundo> it cant stay connect for more then a few minutes
[17:36] <Elbrus> james_w: np and thanks
[17:52] <BUGabundo> ahh finally tracked down what was crashing pidgin (this time)
[17:52] <BUGabundo> an new account plugin
[17:52] <BUGabundo> to see how long it lasts
[17:57] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: going to try hibernated followed by ssh
[17:57] <BUGabundo> byr
[18:11] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: it was really X
[18:11] <BUGabundo> failing to resume
[18:11] <BUGabundo> got traceback
[18:11] <BUGabundo> uploading now
[18:11] <ogasawara> BUGabundo: if the stack trace is not the same as in that bug, you should open a new one
[18:14] <BUGabundo> I opened a new one with apport
[18:14] <BUGabundo> then mark it as dupe
[18:14] <BUGabundo> let me check if it is similar
[18:15] <BUGabundo> doesn't look the same
[18:15] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/327301
[18:19] <BUGabundo> be back in a few min
[18:45] <jbuncher> Are there any kernel devs in here that could help me troubleshoot intel wireless connectivity?  Connecting to WPA Enterprise SSID Hidden with 2.6.24-23 always fails, but with 2.6.24-22 it always succeeds.  Bugreport and syslogs for failed and successful connection attempts are at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317976 .  Thanks for your time!
[19:22] <thomasdelbeke> Hi there
[19:25] <MrKanister> thomasdelbeke: Hi
[19:26] <thomasdelbeke> Hi there MrKanister
[19:26] <thomasdelbeke> That was the landlord harrassing me
[19:27] <thomasdelbeke> sorry 'bout that
[19:27] <thomasdelbeke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irssi/+bug/327213
[19:27] <thomasdelbeke> I posted a new bug
[19:27] <thomasdelbeke> I fear it may be too much again
[19:28] <thomasdelbeke> but I think the last gdb could contain good data
[19:28] <thomasdelbeke> no?
[19:29] <thomasdelbeke> also valgrind ...
[19:29] <thomasdelbeke> !pastebin
[19:30] <thomasdelbeke> http://paste.ubuntu.com/116162/
[19:30] <thomasdelbeke> what do you think?
[19:30] <thomasdelbeke> refile reduced?
[19:36] <thomasdelbeke> http://paste.ubuntu.com/116164/
[19:37] <kari_> I'd like to add information to Bug #323823. I'm not a member in the launchpad so maybe somebody here can take a note.
[19:37] <MrKanister> thomasdelbeke: hmmm...I am not that good at evaluating valgrinds and backtraces, but I think the more information you give the better
[19:38] <thomasdelbeke> ok thanks
[19:38] <thomasdelbeke> I leave it like this then?
[19:39] <MrKanister> sorry for my late answer, I assumed you write my name so I would have benennotified :)
[19:39] <MrKanister> thomasdelbeke: Yes, I would leave it that way. If someone needs more or other information he/she will ask you
[19:39] <thomasdelbeke> sorry MrKanister
[19:40] <MrKanister> thomasdelbeke: np
[19:40] <thomasdelbeke> thanks a lot
[19:40] <thomasdelbeke> cu
[19:40] <MrKanister> bye
[19:41] <kari_> the same problem reported in the Bug #323823 started in my gutsy after updating to the kernel 2.6.22-16. I can not use the latest kernel because of the bug. Running 15 now w/o problems. That's why I guess the bug came with the last kernel update.
[21:20] <hggdh> sigh. Another "shoot and run" :-(
[21:59] <MadsRH> #ubuntu-dk-bugjam
[21:59] <MadsRH> ups. typo - sorry for the noise :-X
[22:41] <jbuncher> Are there any kernel devs in here that could help me troubleshoot intel wireless connectivity?  Connecting to WPA Enterprise SSID Hidden with 2.6.24-23 always fails, but with 2.6.24-22 it always succeeds.  Bugreport and syslogs for failed and successful connection attempts are at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317976 .  Thanks for your time!
[22:50] <IntuitiveNipple> jbuncher, Interesting... On Jaunty with hidden SSID I'm seeing the same issue with iwl3945
[22:51] <jbuncher> IntuitiveNipple:  Yeah, I haven't tried intrepid, since I don't have a laptop with that installed.
[22:52] <IntuitiveNipple> I'm not sure what kernel version is used in the Hardy installation here (the disk is out of the PC right now) but that boots okay.
[22:52] <jbuncher> IntuitiveNipple:  Would you have any idea as to what specific change occured that would cause that?
[22:53] <IntuitiveNipple> I would if i had the other disk connected, but right now I'm moving the laptop to a 400G drive and currently installing and moving stuff over
[22:58] <joumetal> jbuncher: Please add Minimal information from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies. That's all I know.
[23:04] <jbuncher> joumetal:  Thanks, I'll do that as soon as possible.