[10:08] hi all. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements has some /very/ low minimum requirements for "ubuntu desktop" with a note "The minimum requirements are only likely to allow a server (non-graphical) installation to run well" [10:08] shouldnt these 'no GUI' specs be moved under a server heading, and the minimums for desktop adjusted? [10:09] i think its wrong to say ubuntu desktop runs on <500mhz processor - bits will still flip, but its not usable by any stretch of the imagination. [19:33] hello [22:34] Kamping_Kaiser: that seems sensible [22:35] lots of activity on the mailing list today [22:39] hey mdke , do we still want to fix bug 243797 for hardy? [22:39] bah no ubotu here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/243797 [22:41] Rocket2DMn: I'm still of the same opinion as my last comment, tbh [22:41] Rocket2DMn: Pardon? [22:42] jpds, what? [22:42] mdke: Good evening. [22:43] Rocket2DMn: Nothing I just made ubot4 join the channel after your last sentence. [22:43] ah, cool [22:43] If it falls off the internet or something, just grab us in #ubuntu-irc. [22:45] jpds: evening [22:45] mdke, i think we should implement using lshw for that bug since what is described currently doesnt even exist in hardy [22:46] though i think there are some problems with explanations of the output [22:47] Rocket2DMn: right, I understand the bug, I just am not sure how invasive the changes are, so that's why I said I'd like to see a patch [22:47] ok, ill see if i can follow the directions on the wiki later this week and upload a proposed patch to the bug [22:48] Rocket2DMn: awesome. don't forget to use the hardy branch for that one [22:48] yeah, i have hardy, intrepid, and ubuntu-doc branches downloaded and up to date [22:48] you just need a diff right? [22:50] Rocket2DMn: sure, bzr diff can do the trick [22:50] yeah thats the command i see on the wiki [22:50] so ill make the change is minimal as possible then [22:51] that's great. [22:51] guess i should dedicate some time during the bugjam to checking out ubuntu-docs bugs [22:52] if you're up for it, that would be great; there are probably a few bugs that would be easy to fix [22:53] yeah, easy bugs would be a good place to start. we have a bugjam meeting set for the 21st with our loco [22:54] nice [22:54] yeah, we'll see how much time i end up spending helping others triage bugs rather than working on them myself, but ill do my best [22:55] either way, sounds good [23:30] mdke, since its on help.u.c does that make changing it the docteams job? (and or finding similar places it needs changing)