[00:39] [reed]: on linux? [00:39] <[reed]> yes, afaik [00:39] last time i looked it was just "empty code" :) [00:39] but thats a few month a go at least [00:42] [reed]: #ifdef NS_OSSO [00:42] http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/xre/nsNativeAppSupportUnix.cpp#234 [00:42] so on osso aka nokia systems [00:43] <[reed]> ah [00:43] and TestGtkEmbed.cpp also sends memory-pressure [00:44] also when memory is flushed [00:44] which seems to happen on OOM conditions [00:44] http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/base/nsMemoryImpl.cpp#310 [00:45] [reed]: right. now i found what i mean: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/base/nsMemoryImpl.cpp#193 [00:45] #else [00:45] *result = PR_FALSE; [00:46] nsMemoryImpl::IsLowMemory [00:46] <[reed]> so, add the code :) [00:46] yeah. i have that on my radar for quite a while [00:46] its a bit tricky [00:46] nobody could tell me what to actually use to determine low mem ;) [00:47] i think i will check osso [00:47] * asac apt-get source libosso-dev [00:50] wow [00:50] /sys/kernel/high_watermark [00:50] doesnt exist here [00:50] but why is OSSO not using osso lib functions ;) [00:50] instead opening high watermark directly [01:39] <[reed]> asac: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/e5df3dc7-6dfc-4cd6-aaf2-466502090210 [01:39] <[reed]> any ideas? [01:39] <[reed]> I get that on opening pdf files [01:43] [reed]: nppdf ... which plugin is that? [01:43] acrobat? [01:43] or reader [01:45] <[reed]> it's not even installed anymore! [01:45] <[reed]> and it's disabled in add-ons manager [01:45] <[reed]> guh [01:45] <[reed]> I hate plugins [01:48] heh [01:48] [reed]: use mozplugger ;) [01:51] [reed]: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/diff/2f937bb5d31c/modules/plugin/base/src/nsNPAPIPlugin.cpp [01:51] look at 1895 [01:51] seems like a gross hack [01:51] maybe remove the whole block for testing ;) [01:52] e.g. 1895-1902 -> kill [01:52] hmm [01:53] <[reed]> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/diff/2f937bb5d31c/modules/plugin/base/src/nsNPAPIPlugin.cpp#l1895 is a } [01:53] <[reed]> heh [01:53] welll for me its // adobe nppdf calls XtGetApplicationNameAndClass(display, [01:53] 94 is } [02:07] [reed]: maybe try whether its a regression because of http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ce7f39495675 [02:08] [reed]: can you backout that and see? thanks [02:09] but i doubt it ;) [02:09] previously: #define GDK_ROOT_PARENT() (gdk_get_default_root_window ()) [02:09] now #define GDK_ROOT_WINDOW() (gdk_x11_get_default_root_xwindow ()) [02:10] but difference is: "the current screen." vs. " the default screen." [02:11] [reed]: is it a null-deref? [02:12] [reed]: in case backour thelps try to just replace the ROOT_WINDOW with gdk_get_default_root_window () [02:12] <[reed]> well, I just removed the plugin [02:12] <[reed]> lol [02:12] hmm [02:12] <[reed]> and swapped back to evince ;) [02:12] heh [02:12] yeah. but would be beneficial to track this regression ;) [02:12] at lesat if its really because of the changesetg [02:12] <[reed]> apt-get install adoberead-edu [02:12] <[reed]> er [02:13] <[reed]> enu* [02:13] <[reed]> enjoy! [02:13] <[reed]> ;) [02:13] not in archive here [02:14] <[reed]> it's in the canonical repo [02:16] hmm ... intrepid? [02:19] doesnt exist in my partner repo ;) [02:40] [reed]: current adobe reader from adobe website works for me [02:40] in daily 3.2 [02:40] hmm [02:41] a bit outdated [12:25] hi [12:25] asac: dpkg -L sun* [12:25] Package `sun*' is not installed. [12:25] Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files, [12:25] and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents. [12:25] oh wait a minute [12:25] asac: please review my patch for #305004 [12:26] bug 305004 [12:26] Launchpad bug 305004 in ubufox "Untranslated fallback string" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/305004 [12:26] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/621200 [12:27] i was hoping you could use wildcard with -L [12:27] gnomefreak: thats not the java plugin [12:27] at least i dont see a plugin .so i n there [12:28] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/621202 [12:29] i dont see .so either [12:31] sianis: what email for credits? [12:32] asac: huh? [12:32] ok found it [12:32] using your gmail thing [12:33] sianis: committed. thanks [12:33] asac: great, thank you [12:55] what package provides bzr bd in hardy? its telling me bd is unknown command [12:56] i have bzr and bzr-builddeb installed [12:57] installed: bzr bzr-builddeb bzrtools fakeroot patchutils python-central python-debian python-support [13:05] Unable to load plugin 'builddeb' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins' is the error i get [13:17] !info seamonkey hardy [13:17] seamonkey (source: seamonkey): The Seamonkey Internet Suite. In component universe, is optional. Version 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 (hardy), package size 23 kB, installed size 88 kB [13:17] ah it is i see [13:18] gnomefreak: install bzr-builddeb [13:18] ;) [13:19] bzr bd should work then [13:21] your right but it doesnt i use dpkg-buildpackage instead [13:22] fta: [Build #864529] i386 build of pri [13:22] .9.1+svn20090210r22135-0ubuntu1~u [13:22] ELEASE (ubuntu-mozilla-daily PPA) [13:22] failed [13:22] i have to fix intrepid branch and hardy is working atm but i nominated for intrepid adn hardy. can you ok them please bug 309655 [13:23] Launchpad bug 309655 in seamonkey "Seamonkey 1.1.14 security upgrade" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/309655 [13:23] asac: ^\ [13:24] * gnomefreak smoke [13:31] gnomefreak: approved [13:31] thanks [14:05] Could someone approve my Debian BTS message to the mailing list, please? :) [14:05] gnomefreak: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22485478/crashFirefox.html does that crash for you? [14:06] hold on let me save shit. what version? [14:07] asac: doesnt crash with 3.2 [14:13] asac: doesnt crash in 3.0 nor 3.1 as well as 3.2 [14:14] ok be back i need to finish some work i started [14:19] thanks [14:58] how do i add a context menu item to the message pane? [14:59] mconnor: whats the plan for new-tab in 3.1. is http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/firefox-31-new-tab-spec still the plan? [14:59] dorgan: extension? [15:00] yes i am aware of that I am not sure of what file/item i am overlaying [15:01] dorgan: heh ;) [15:01] i would have to look at source too [15:01] in thunderbird i want to add a menu item to the context menu when you right click on an email [15:02] dorgan: i gues its dorgan: thats in mail/base/content/mailWindowOverlay.xul [15:03] or folderPaneContext [15:05] how do you find these so quick? [15:06] dorgan: i look in the source and know what to look for ;) [15:07] dorgan: you can also use dom inspector [15:07] but i didnt do that here [15:07] dom inspector doesnt seem to work [15:07] or maybe it does and i dont know how to use itr [15:07] *it [15:08] dolske: personally i would suggest that you develop against tbird 3 ... its in the ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily team PPA and the dom inspector works fine [15:08] its uncertain when it will come out, but tbird 2 is really getting old ;) [15:08] i am assuming your talking to me? [15:08] if so i am deving against Tb3 [15:08] :) [15:12] dorgan: yeah :) [15:12] dorgan: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ [15:12] thats the ppa [15:13] where we provide dailies for development branches [15:22] ahhh now my extension is finally done [15:22] not bad for my first extension [15:23] basically what it does is allow our order processing department to take an email/attachments and fill out a form with information about the customer then it puts those files in a queue folder with some text files that contain the information about the customer...I am now building a PHP script to put that information into a DB for searching as well as put the attachments into an art library for archiving/web viewing [15:26] dorgan: heh. sounds streamlined ;) [15:30] yeah hopefully it will get rid of having to print out emails/attachments and scan them into the document management software we currently use === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [15:43] you brokw tb3 [15:43] s/you/who [15:44] yep its broke its all blank no address in left pane and nothing in top or bottom pane [15:46] 3.0~b2~hg20090210r1916+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 is the broken version. someone else care to test it to make sure its not me [15:48] * gnomefreak thinks bot should test packages before pushing but i doubt that is possible [15:58] asac : Do you have any thunderbird 3.0b2 build somewhere in a PPA? I have the thunderbird-3.0.head bzr branch but I need the sources and the cdbs-config_list file [15:59] saivann: we have ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily ppa now [15:59] just add that and track thunderbird-3.0 as it proceeds [15:59] additions made to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DailyUpstreamBuildsPOCSpec that might interest you [16:00] * asac looks [16:00] * asac searches for a diff [16:00] asac : Thanks, that's what I needed [16:01] asac: fta2 http://www.flickr.com/photos/26378196@N05/3271492111/ [16:02] dont install that version in umd of tb3 [16:02] see above link [16:04] I'll have a look later today [16:05] thanks [16:05] gnomefreak, please don't use the daily ppa if you want tested packages, daily means untested by nature [16:06] i run the latest ... works for me [16:06] everything in umd works fine except tb3 [16:08] FAQ: gr::RangeSegment crashes -> remove pango-graphite [16:08] i was looking at that earlier and was gonna install it [16:19] oh well an excuse to check email another day :) [16:22] asac, it doesn't for me either [16:22] Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIXPCComponents_Utils.import]" nsresult: "0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://messenger/content/msgMail3PaneWindow.js :: :: line 4" data: no] [16:22] too bad i broke compare when i moved the mozclient files into the debian dir [16:22] fta2: error without consequences? [16:23] fta2: we still have time to fix after feature freeze ;) [16:23] ??? [16:23] to fix compare for instance ;) [16:23] FF is on 19th [16:23] early enough ;) [16:23] no, it's broekn in tb3 [16:23] wierd [16:24] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090210 Shredder/3.0b2pre [16:24] that works [16:24] so probably today? [16:24] i also moved tb3 to embedded tarball, it's just a matter of depth [16:24] thats good [16:24] it's not usable (tb3 ~umd) [16:24] the panes are empty [16:24] yes, but the build above works fine here for me ,) [16:24] doing bugmail with it [16:25] or do you mean 3.1? [16:25] ;) [16:25] hmm [16:25] i guess we should file a bug ;) [16:25] regression [16:26] let me verify ... getting todays dailies now [16:26] fta2: when do you run dailies? 4am? [16:26] wonder if i should upgrade every morning or every lunch ;) [16:27] yep, 4am [16:27] cool [16:27] so every morning [16:27] * asac crosses fingers that he can still process bugs [16:27] ;) [16:28] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Shredder.png [16:28] unpacking [16:28] !info firefox intrepid [16:28] firefox (source: firefox-3.0): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 (intrepid), package size 67 kB, installed size 124 kB [16:28] !info firefox hardy [16:29] firefox (source: firefox-3.0): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 (hardy), package size 64 kB, installed size 120 kB [16:29] fta2: so resource://app/modules/activity/activityModules.js is missing? [16:29] !info firefox gutsy [16:29] firefox (source: firefox): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla. In component main, is optional. Version 2.0.0.21~20090209t122238+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10.1 (gutsy), package size 9046 kB, installed size 26124 kB [16:29] i assume resource://gre/modules/folderUtils.jsm is there [16:30] !info firefox-3.0 gutsy [16:30] firefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla (Development Version). In component universe, is optional. Version 3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (gutsy), package size 1130 kB, installed size 3832 kB [16:30] yeah /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.0b2pre/modules/folderUtils.jsm [16:33] so yeah :) ... no its broken for me too ;) [16:37] * asac downgraded [16:38] fta2: so: $(INSTALL) $(IFLAGS1) $^ $(FINAL_TARGET)/modules/activity [16:39] and also nsActivity.js \ nsActivityManager.js \ nsActivityManagerUI.js \ [16:39] as new components as it seems [16:40] i will look into it [16:41] just amazing that tbird orig is 53M [16:41] should be trivial [16:44] asac, ^^ probably the stupid fix_unix_installer.patch [16:44] they should maintain that [16:44] not us [16:45] fta2: yeah. that patch is painful ;) [16:45] at least without compare [16:56] build-tree/mozilla/mozilla/dist/bin, hmm [16:58] that may confuse compare [16:58] asac, DEB_SRCDIR vs DEB_TAR_SRCDIR [16:59] DEB_SRCDIR is wrong [17:02] * asac installs sauerbraten and wonders whats coming out of it [17:23] disk full [17:23] gasp [17:36] <[reed]> fta: is that filed? [17:42] gloda [17:43] hmm whats that ;)? [17:43] i guess 1.1.14 will have to wait i ran out of room :( [17:44] ok gone for a while i need to get shit here done. === asac_ is now known as asac [18:55] cwong1: hey ;) how are things going? [18:55] * asac back from reboot [19:21] back [19:52] dtchen, p-a 0.9.15 seems to be controlling the mixer channels, it sets some to 0, and others to a low value each time i play or pause rhythmbox, making the others apps crazy [19:54] dtchen, rhythmbox just froze on unpause, apparently lost with the status of the sound device [20:21] sound is definitly the next NM ;) [20:23] it seems worse to me [20:24] current state: nothing works ;) [20:24] ? [20:25] almost nothing, yes [20:25] for me current experience is fun ;) [20:25] my window borders are all white ;) [20:25] without any elements [20:25] they are there, but not rendered ;) [20:27] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/screen_white.png [20:27] http://paste.ubuntu.com/117004/ [20:27] fta: yes i already started to do that [20:27] got distracted [20:28] well, i fixed the double mozilla dir [20:28] its a bit strange as bin/modules/* doesnt copy recursively [20:28] fta: i had that fixed too ... but feel free to push ;) [20:28] well ... i hacked compare.mk ;) [20:29] to also test for mozilla/mozilla/dist/bin [20:30] mozilla/mozilla is never supposed to exist [20:34] oops, i forgot that it was the messy comm-central build, so yes, moz/moz is expected. too bad [20:35] thought you fixed it ;) [20:36] if we need to add that to compare.mk we should do it ... cant harm to do another upload before ff [20:37] well, i changed $tar_something to fix what i thought was causing the double dir [20:37] hmm [20:37] i'm puzzled now [20:50] asac, what is gloda? [20:50] fta: not sure ;) [20:50] but seems we need to ship it [20:51] http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird/browse_thread/thread/9ab176f923b7aba4 [20:51] Gloda (global database) is is an indexer and database, the backend to [20:51] major improvements to come in search capability, data aggregation and [20:51] visualization, and productivity. Gloda works in the background, and is a [20:51] layer on top of (not a replacement for) the existing folder-centric [20:51] message storage mechanism. [20:51] so its the safe-browsing equivalent for tbird [20:52] instead of scratching your disk for security reasons you get rumbling for search ;) [20:52] probably better comparison is places... but was kiddin anyway [20:53] ok relogin [20:59] asac: nothing Aza posts is ever usually an absolute plan, and that stuff missed 3.1 [21:00] mconnor: ok thanks for the info. is that even still something you look into for future? [21:00] yep [21:01] i really hate to have to maintain installer/unix/packages-static because they don't care about unix and/or make install [21:01] grrrr [21:02] <[reed]> fta: reopen the bug [21:02] fta: hey ;) ... dont maildev folks have a plan for something else? [21:02] <[reed]> it was fontfix'd no? [21:02] <[reed]> wontfix'd* [21:02] [reed]: i think they wontfixed it ;) [21:02] yes [21:02] <[reed]> yes, reopen it, explain that it's really hurting the distros, and cc dmose directly [21:03] fta: do you you have the bug id? [21:03] so what's going on? [21:03] explain this a little better, I thought Fx's build config needed packages-static, why doesn't thunderbird's? [21:04] i think its thunderbird 3 build system pain. with xul 1.9 firefox and xul moved its make install target to use packages-static [21:04] right ... so thunderbird 3 does it different, we opened bug and they said they didnt want that [21:04] but that was quite early ... i think a1 or something [21:05] mozilla bug 420391 [21:05] i cannot remember all the details and since tbird 3 was still far far ahead i didnt really ran after it. [21:05] it's assigned [21:05] Mozilla bug 420391 in Build Config "unix/packages-static for thunderbird (trunk)" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420391 [21:05] hmm [21:06] but they are re-doing exactly the same thing that i did initially [21:09] so its static vs. shared where ffox/tbird disagree/follow different path [21:10] but the patch is still adding packages-static, which is what we need [21:12] <[reed]> nom it for blocking and explain why this is hurting Ubuntu [21:12] sorry i am too tired to understand why he suddenly agreed [21:12] [reed]: maybe i misread that but seems that he complained and now submitted the same patch ... just improved. [21:12] fta: ^^ is that correct? [21:13] seems so ... good [21:13] where is the improvement? it may be just more up-to-date [21:13] fta: removed-files [21:13] not sure if that is needed, but seems like it is [21:13] it is [21:14] otherwise you can have stuff lying around that causes problems [21:14] so i will grab the patch and use that instead, i don't mind, i'm just sick of blindly maintaining this on my side [21:14] fta: if its still up to date ;) [21:15] we'll see [21:15] compare is fixed now [21:15] i think this should land ... once it does we can make hard compare and will notice any missing updates on daily builds [21:15] which is quite nice [21:16] that was the initial idea of compare, but even ff and xul keep forgetting stuff for a long while [21:17] fta: yes, then we should fail hard on that and help maintaining those files [21:18] its definitly better than what we had before where we had to add install: targets every other day ;) [21:18] tricky with the xpt that seems to be bundled at install time [21:18] -s [21:18] fta: doesnt the removed-files file take care for cleanness? [21:19] maybe, but compare 1st try dist/bin (unclean) vs debian/tmp (clean) [21:21] fta: we can filter for known false positives [21:22] possible, but still not ideal [21:23] http://paste.ubuntu.com/117018/ eh?? components/ and bin/components/ ? [21:29] odd [21:30] either that file completely changes, or the patch is seriously broken [21:31] it adds the #ifdef unix inside a huge #ifdef xp with almost everything in it [21:32] i don't get why all the xpt are in an xp block [21:38] make[2]: Entering directory `/src/bzr/build-area/thunderbird-3.0-3.0~b2~hg20090210r1916+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/mail/installer' [21:38] Makefile:72: *** you need a "--enable-static --disable-shared" build to package a build. Stop. [21:38] make[2]: Leaving directory `/src/bzr/build-area/thunderbird-3.0-3.0~b2~hg20090210r1916+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/mail/installer' [21:38] make[1]: *** [install] Error 2 [21:38] grrrr [21:39] obviously [21:40] dropping that, it's bullshit [21:48] asac, now, it wants me to remove all the .so in components [21:57] asac, seems seriously broken to me: http://paste.ubuntu.com/117029/ [21:57] asac, no libxul ? [22:11] my patch was better, it took care of tons of optional features from configure, the last patch in the bug totally missed that [22:37] asac, help [22:39] asac, it no longer starts, no error, no nothing: http://paste.ubuntu.com/117040/ [22:47] fta: cant we use your patch + remove-files? [22:51] probably but i wanted to use their patch [22:52] but it's non-sense [22:52] they dropped all .so, but look: http://paste.ubuntu.com/117041/ [23:00] dtchen, help, my dell laptop is emitting continuous strident sounds when it used to emit a short system beep before. it's too easy to trigger, it makes me jump out of my chair [23:01] heh ... so minefield now gives me annoying sounds when a alert pops up ;) [23:02] me too [23:02] canberra? [23:02] probably [23:02] beh? [23:02] dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512 [23:02] make: *** [binary-predeb-IMPL/thunderbird-3.0] Error 1 [23:03] bad binaries ;)? [23:05] no idea, retrying.. [23:07] same [23:12] damn, i had libmozjs0d installed in that chroot, it was used during the build, i removed it, now everything is messed up now. [23:12] i need to rebuild [23:17] it used libmozjs0d? scary [23:17] really [23:18] yep, shlib even added it to Depends [23:18] thunderbird-3.0 depends on libmozjs0d (>= 1.8.1.5); however: [23:18] Package libmozjs0d is not installed. [23:18] scary it is [23:18] fta: but seems you had libmozjs-dev installed [23:19] anyway ... -> xulrunner 1.9 _has_ to die [23:19] 1.8 ? [23:20] I had libmozjs-dev for some reasons, but i don't remember why [23:21] 1.8 ;) [23:23] what's left using it? [23:25] too many things [23:26] i have the feeling it got more in this cycle [23:26] http://pastebin.com/fcf2eeb1 [23:26] http://pastebin.com/fcf2eeb1 [23:27] http://pastebin.com/f23213143 [23:27] the whole eclipse stack [23:27] libswt3.2-gtk-jni [23:27] libmozillainterfaces-java [23:27] eclipse [23:28] i would hope that that would go away by fixing eclipse [23:28] (all three) [23:28] # [23:28] mobile-basic-flash [23:28] bah [23:28] not sure why that hasnt moved forward [23:28] mozjs is more interesting [23:28] http://pastebin.com/fcf2eeb1 [23:28] mediatomb-common [23:28] libjavascript-perl -> fta ? [23:28] can you look if we can do something about that? [23:28] maybe taking the js glue hack from google gadgets? [23:29] gxine -> bah [23:29] why is that again? [23:29] edbrowse -> build system seems spartanic [23:30] couchdb -> likewise .... glue hack has to come [23:31] not sure what bfilter does [23:31] seems they ship their own copy of libjs ... ouch [23:32] fta: thats it i would hope [23:32] maybe something rdepends on python-xpcom ;) [23:32] hmm [23:33] i think our xul should really ship some magic libmozjs-dev [23:34] maybe i should put an empty package in before FF ;) [23:34] and respin all those that currently rdepend [23:34] and let them fail until motu fix it ;) [23:35] i think people would consider that inpolite though ;) [23:35] lol, why not, could be fun [23:36] though a bit late [23:38] fta: well ... if its now empty its not a missing feature but a bug ;) .... see the difference? [23:39] is this the right place for questions about mozillateam launchpad ppa?