[00:39] <asac> [reed]: on linux?
[00:39] <[reed]> yes, afaik
[00:39] <asac> last time i looked it was just "empty code" :)
[00:39] <asac> but thats a few month a go at least
[00:42] <asac> [reed]:  #ifdef NS_OSSO
[00:42] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/xre/nsNativeAppSupportUnix.cpp#234
[00:42] <asac> so on osso aka nokia systems
[00:43] <[reed]> ah
[00:43] <asac> and TestGtkEmbed.cpp also sends memory-pressure
[00:44] <asac> also when memory is flushed
[00:44] <asac> which seems to happen on OOM conditions
[00:44] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/base/nsMemoryImpl.cpp#310
[00:45] <asac> [reed]: right. now i found what i mean: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/base/nsMemoryImpl.cpp#193
[00:45] <asac> #else
[00:45] <asac>   *result = PR_FALSE;
[00:46] <asac> nsMemoryImpl::IsLowMemory
[00:46] <[reed]> so, add the code :)
[00:46] <asac> yeah. i have that on my radar for quite a while
[00:46] <asac> its a bit tricky
[00:46] <asac> nobody could tell me what to actually use to determine low mem ;)
[00:47] <asac> i think i will check osso
[00:47]  * asac apt-get source libosso-dev
[00:50] <asac> wow
[00:50] <asac> /sys/kernel/high_watermark
[00:50] <asac> doesnt exist here
[00:50] <asac> but why is OSSO not using osso lib functions ;)
[00:50] <asac> instead opening high watermark directly
[01:39] <[reed]> asac: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/e5df3dc7-6dfc-4cd6-aaf2-466502090210
[01:39] <[reed]> any ideas?
[01:39] <[reed]> I get that on opening pdf files
[01:43] <asac> [reed]: nppdf ... which plugin is that?
[01:43] <asac> acrobat?
[01:43] <asac> or reader
[01:45] <[reed]> it's not even installed anymore!
[01:45] <[reed]> and it's disabled in add-ons manager
[01:45] <[reed]> guh
[01:45] <[reed]> I hate plugins
[01:48] <asac> heh
[01:48] <asac> [reed]: use mozplugger ;)
[01:51] <asac> [reed]: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/diff/2f937bb5d31c/modules/plugin/base/src/nsNPAPIPlugin.cpp
[01:51] <asac> look at 1895
[01:51] <asac> seems like a gross hack
[01:51] <asac> maybe remove the whole block for testing ;)
[01:52] <asac> e.g. 1895-1902 -> kill
[01:52] <asac> hmm
[01:53] <[reed]> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/diff/2f937bb5d31c/modules/plugin/base/src/nsNPAPIPlugin.cpp#l1895 is a }
[01:53] <[reed]> heh
[01:53] <asac> welll for me its // adobe nppdf calls XtGetApplicationNameAndClass(display,
[01:53] <asac> 94 is }
[02:07] <asac> [reed]: maybe try whether its a regression because of http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ce7f39495675
[02:08] <asac> [reed]: can you backout that and see? thanks
[02:09] <asac> but i doubt it ;)
[02:09] <asac> previously: #define GDK_ROOT_PARENT()             (gdk_get_default_root_window ())
[02:09] <asac> now #define GDK_ROOT_WINDOW()             (gdk_x11_get_default_root_xwindow ())
[02:10] <asac> but difference is: "the current screen." vs. " the default screen."
[02:11] <asac> [reed]: is it a null-deref?
[02:12] <asac> [reed]: in case backour thelps try to just replace the ROOT_WINDOW with gdk_get_default_root_window ()
[02:12] <[reed]> well, I just removed the plugin
[02:12] <[reed]> lol
[02:12] <asac> hmm
[02:12] <[reed]> and swapped back to evince ;)
[02:12] <asac> heh
[02:12] <asac> yeah. but would be beneficial to track this regression ;)
[02:12] <asac> at lesat if its really because of the changesetg
[02:12] <[reed]> apt-get install adoberead-edu
[02:12] <[reed]> er
[02:13] <[reed]> enu*
[02:13] <[reed]> enjoy!
[02:13] <[reed]> ;)
[02:13] <asac> not in archive here
[02:14] <[reed]> it's in the canonical repo
[02:16] <asac> hmm ... intrepid?
[02:19] <asac> doesnt exist in my partner repo ;)
[02:40] <asac> [reed]: current adobe reader from adobe website works for me
[02:40] <asac> in daily 3.2
[02:40] <asac> hmm
[02:41] <asac> a bit outdated
[12:25] <sianis> hi
[12:25] <gnomefreak> asac: dpkg -L sun*
[12:25] <gnomefreak> Package `sun*' is not installed.
[12:25] <gnomefreak> Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
[12:25] <gnomefreak> and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
[12:25] <gnomefreak> oh wait a minute
[12:25] <sianis> asac: please review my patch for #305004
[12:26] <asac> bug 305004
[12:26] <gnomefreak> asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/621200
[12:27] <gnomefreak> i was hoping you could use wildcard with -L
[12:27] <asac> gnomefreak: thats not the java plugin
[12:27] <asac> at least i dont see a plugin .so i n there
[12:28] <gnomefreak> asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/621202
[12:29] <gnomefreak> i dont see .so either
[12:31] <asac> sianis: what email for credits?
[12:32] <sianis> asac: huh?
[12:32] <asac> ok found it
[12:32] <asac> using your gmail thing
[12:33] <asac> sianis: committed. thanks
[12:33] <sianis> asac: great, thank you
[12:55] <gnomefreak> what package provides bzr bd in hardy? its telling me bd is unknown command
[12:56] <gnomefreak> i have bzr and bzr-builddeb installed
[12:57] <gnomefreak> installed: bzr bzr-builddeb bzrtools fakeroot patchutils python-central python-debian python-support
[13:05] <gnomefreak> Unable to load plugin 'builddeb' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins'   is the error i get
[13:17] <gnomefreak> !info seamonkey hardy
[13:17] <gnomefreak> ah it is i see
[13:18] <asac> gnomefreak: install bzr-builddeb
[13:18] <asac> ;)
[13:19] <asac> bzr bd should work then
[13:21] <gnomefreak> your right but it doesnt i use dpkg-buildpackage instead
[13:22] <asac> fta: [Build #864529] i386 build of pri
[13:22] <asac> .9.1+svn20090210r22135-0ubuntu1~u
[13:22] <asac> ELEASE (ubuntu-mozilla-daily PPA)
[13:22] <asac> failed
[13:22] <gnomefreak> i have to fix intrepid branch and hardy is working atm but i nominated for intrepid adn hardy. can you ok them please bug 309655
[13:23] <gnomefreak> asac: ^\
[13:24]  * gnomefreak smoke
[13:31] <asac> gnomefreak: approved
[13:31] <gnomefreak> thanks
[14:05] <diocles> Could someone approve my Debian BTS message to the mailing list, please? :)
[14:05] <asac> gnomefreak: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22485478/crashFirefox.html does that crash for you?
[14:06] <gnomefreak> hold on let me save shit. what version?
[14:07] <gnomefreak> asac: doesnt crash with 3.2
[14:13] <gnomefreak> asac: doesnt crash in 3.0 nor 3.1 as well as 3.2
[14:14] <gnomefreak> ok be back i need to finish some work i started
[14:19] <asac> thanks
[14:58] <dorgan> how do i add a context menu item to the message pane?
[14:59] <asac> mconnor: whats the plan for new-tab in 3.1. is http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/firefox-31-new-tab-spec still the plan?
[14:59] <asac> dorgan: extension?
[15:00] <dorgan> yes i am aware of that I am not sure of what file/item i am overlaying
[15:01] <asac> dorgan: heh ;)
[15:01] <asac> i would have to look at source too
[15:01] <dorgan> in  thunderbird i want to add a menu item to the context menu when you right click on an email
[15:02] <asac> dorgan: i gues its <popup id="mailContext"
[15:02] <asac> dorgan: thats in mail/base/content/mailWindowOverlay.xul
[15:03] <asac> or folderPaneContext
[15:05] <dorgan> how do you find these so quick?
[15:06] <asac> dorgan: i look in the source and know what to look for ;)
[15:07] <asac> dorgan: you can also use dom inspector
[15:07] <asac> but i didnt do that here
[15:07] <dorgan>  dom inspector doesnt seem to work
[15:07] <dorgan> or maybe it does and i dont know how to use itr
[15:07] <dorgan> *it
[15:08] <asac> dolske: personally i would suggest that you develop against tbird 3 ... its in the ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily team PPA and the dom inspector works fine
[15:08] <asac> its uncertain when it will come out, but tbird 2 is really getting old ;)
[15:08] <dorgan> i am assuming your talking to me?
[15:08] <dorgan> if so i am deving against Tb3
[15:08] <dorgan>  :)
[15:12] <asac> dorgan: yeah :)
[15:12] <asac> dorgan: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/
[15:12] <asac> thats the ppa
[15:13] <asac> where we provide dailies for development branches
[15:22] <dorgan> ahhh now my extension is finally done
[15:22] <dorgan> not bad for my first extension
[15:23] <dorgan> basically what it does is allow our order processing department to take an email/attachments and fill out a form with information about the customer then it puts those files in a queue folder with some text files that contain the information about the customer...I am now building a PHP script to put that information into a DB for searching as well as put the attachments into an art library for archiving/web viewing
[15:26] <asac> dorgan: heh. sounds streamlined ;)
[15:30] <dorgan> yeah hopefully it will get rid of having to print out emails/attachments and scan them into the document management software we currently use
[15:43] <gnomefreak> you brokw tb3
[15:43] <gnomefreak> s/you/who
[15:44] <gnomefreak> yep its broke its all blank no address in left pane and nothing in top or bottom pane
[15:46] <gnomefreak> 3.0~b2~hg20090210r1916+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 is the broken version. someone else care to test it to make sure its not me
[15:48]  * gnomefreak thinks bot should test packages before pushing but i doubt that is possible
[15:58] <saivann> asac : Do you have any thunderbird 3.0b2 build somewhere in a PPA? I have the thunderbird-3.0.head bzr branch but I need the sources and the cdbs-config_list file
[15:59] <asac> saivann: we have ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily ppa now
[15:59] <asac> just add that and track thunderbird-3.0 as it proceeds
[15:59] <james_w> additions made to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DailyUpstreamBuildsPOCSpec that might interest you
[16:00]  * asac looks
[16:00]  * asac searches for a diff
[16:00] <saivann> asac : Thanks, that's what I needed
[16:01] <gnomefreak> asac: fta2 http://www.flickr.com/photos/26378196@N05/3271492111/
[16:02] <gnomefreak> dont install that version in umd of tb3
[16:02] <gnomefreak> see above link
[16:04] <fta2> I'll have a look later today
[16:05] <gnomefreak> thanks
[16:05] <fta2> gnomefreak, please don't use the daily ppa if you want tested packages, daily means untested by nature
[16:06] <asac> i run the latest ... works for me
[16:06] <gnomefreak> everything in umd works fine except tb3
[16:08] <asac> FAQ: gr::RangeSegment crashes -> remove pango-graphite
[16:08] <gnomefreak> i was looking at that earlier and was gonna install it
[16:19] <gnomefreak> oh well an excuse to check email another day :)
[16:22] <fta2> asac, it doesn't for me either
[16:22] <fta2> Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIXPCComponents_Utils.import]"  nsresult: "0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)"  location: "JS frame :: chrome://messenger/content/msgMail3PaneWindow.js :: <TOP_LEVEL> :: line 4"  data: no]
[16:22] <fta2> too bad i broke compare when i moved the mozclient files into the debian dir
[16:22] <asac> fta2: error without consequences?
[16:23] <asac> fta2: we still have time to fix after feature freeze ;)
[16:23] <fta2> ???
[16:23] <asac> to fix compare for instance ;)
[16:23] <asac> FF is on 19th
[16:23] <asac> early enough ;)
[16:23] <fta2> no, it's broekn in tb3
[16:23] <asac> wierd
[16:24] <asac> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090210 Shredder/3.0b2pre
[16:24] <asac> that works
[16:24] <asac> so probably today?
[16:24] <fta2> i also moved tb3 to embedded tarball, it's just a matter of depth
[16:24] <asac> thats good
[16:24] <fta2> it's not usable (tb3 ~umd)
[16:24] <fta2> the panes are empty
[16:24] <asac> yes, but the build above works fine here for me ,)
[16:24] <asac> doing bugmail with it
[16:25] <asac> or do you mean 3.1?
[16:25] <asac> ;)
[16:25] <asac> hmm
[16:25] <asac> i guess we should file a bug ;)
[16:25] <asac> regression
[16:26] <asac> let me verify ... getting todays dailies now
[16:26] <asac> fta2: when do you run dailies? 4am?
[16:26] <asac> wonder if i should upgrade every morning or every lunch ;)
[16:27] <fta2> yep, 4am
[16:27] <asac> cool
[16:27] <asac> so every morning
[16:27]  * asac crosses fingers that he can still process bugs
[16:27] <asac> ;)
[16:28] <fta2> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Shredder.png
[16:28] <asac> unpacking
[16:28] <gnomefreak> !info firefox intrepid
[16:28] <gnomefreak> !info firefox hardy
[16:29] <asac> fta2: so resource://app/modules/activity/activityModules.js is missing?
[16:29] <gnomefreak> !info firefox gutsy
[16:29] <asac> i assume resource://gre/modules/folderUtils.jsm is there
[16:30] <gnomefreak> !info firefox-3.0 gutsy
[16:30] <asac> yeah /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.0b2pre/modules/folderUtils.jsm
[16:33] <asac> so yeah :) ... no its broken for me too ;)
[16:37]  * asac downgraded
[16:38] <asac> fta2: so: $(INSTALL) $(IFLAGS1) $^ $(FINAL_TARGET)/modules/activity
[16:39] <asac> and also   nsActivity.js \ nsActivityManager.js \ nsActivityManagerUI.js \
[16:39] <asac> as new components as it seems
[16:40] <asac> i will look into it
[16:41] <asac> just amazing that tbird orig is 53M
[16:41] <fta2> should be trivial
[16:44] <fta2> asac, ^^ probably the stupid fix_unix_installer.patch
[16:44] <fta2> they should maintain that
[16:44] <fta2> not us
[16:45] <asac> fta2: yeah. that patch is painful ;)
[16:45] <asac> at least without compare
[16:56] <fta2> build-tree/mozilla/mozilla/dist/bin, hmm
[16:58] <fta2> that may confuse compare
[16:58] <fta2> asac, DEB_SRCDIR vs DEB_TAR_SRCDIR
[16:59] <fta2> DEB_SRCDIR is wrong
[17:02]  * asac  installs sauerbraten and wonders whats coming out of it
[17:23] <fta2> disk full
[17:23] <fta2> gasp
[17:36] <[reed]> fta: is that filed?
[17:42] <asac_> gloda
[17:43] <asac_> hmm whats that ;)?
[17:43] <gnomefreak> i guess 1.1.14 will have to wait i ran out of room :(
[17:44] <gnomefreak> ok gone for a while i need to get shit here done.
[18:55] <asac> cwong1: hey ;) how are things going?
[18:55]  * asac back from reboot
[19:21] <fta> back
[19:52] <fta> dtchen, p-a 0.9.15 seems to be controlling the mixer channels, it sets some to 0, and others to a low value each time i play or pause rhythmbox, making the others apps crazy
[19:54] <fta> dtchen, rhythmbox just froze on unpause, apparently lost with the status of the sound device
[20:21] <asac> sound is definitly the next NM ;)
[20:23] <fta> it seems worse to me
[20:24] <asac> current state: nothing works ;)
[20:24] <asac> ?
[20:25] <fta> almost nothing, yes
[20:25] <asac> for me current experience is fun ;)
[20:25] <asac> my window borders are all white ;)
[20:25] <asac> without any elements
[20:25] <asac> they are there, but not rendered ;)
[20:27] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/screen_white.png
[20:27] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/117004/
[20:27] <asac> fta: yes i already started to do that
[20:27] <asac> got distracted
[20:28] <fta> well, i fixed the double mozilla dir
[20:28] <asac> its a bit strange as bin/modules/* doesnt copy recursively
[20:28] <asac> fta: i had that fixed too ... but feel free to push ;)
[20:28] <asac> well ... i hacked compare.mk ;)
[20:29] <asac> to also test for mozilla/mozilla/dist/bin
[20:30] <fta> mozilla/mozilla is never supposed to exist
[20:34] <fta> oops, i forgot that it was the messy comm-central build, so yes, moz/moz is expected. too bad
[20:35] <asac> thought you fixed it ;)
[20:36] <asac> if we need to add that to compare.mk we should do it ... cant harm to do another upload before ff
[20:37] <fta> well, i changed $tar_something to fix what i thought was causing the double dir
[20:37] <fta> hmm
[20:37] <fta> i'm puzzled now
[20:50] <fta> asac, what is gloda?
[20:50] <asac> fta: not sure ;)
[20:50] <asac> but seems we need to ship it
[20:51] <asac> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird/browse_thread/thread/9ab176f923b7aba4
[20:51] <asac> Gloda (global database) is is an indexer and database, the backend to
[20:51] <asac> major improvements to come in search capability, data aggregation and
[20:51] <asac> visualization, and productivity. Gloda works in the background, and is a
[20:51] <asac> layer on top of (not a replacement for) the existing folder-centric
[20:51] <asac> message storage mechanism.
[20:51] <asac> so its the safe-browsing equivalent for tbird
[20:52] <asac> instead of scratching your disk for security reasons you get rumbling for search ;)
[20:52] <asac> probably better comparison is places... but was kiddin anyway
[20:53] <asac> ok relogin
[20:59] <mconnor> asac: nothing Aza posts is ever usually an absolute plan, and that stuff missed 3.1
[21:00] <asac> mconnor: ok thanks for the info. is that even still something you look into for future?
[21:00] <mconnor> yep
[21:01] <fta> i really hate to have to maintain installer/unix/packages-static because they don't care about unix and/or make install
[21:01] <fta> grrrr
[21:02] <[reed]> fta: reopen the bug
[21:02] <asac> fta: hey ;) ... dont maildev folks have a plan for something else?
[21:02] <[reed]> it was fontfix'd no?
[21:02] <[reed]> wontfix'd*
[21:02] <asac> [reed]: i think they wontfixed it ;)
[21:02] <asac> yes
[21:02] <[reed]> yes, reopen it, explain that it's really hurting the distros, and cc dmose directly
[21:03] <asac> fta: do you you have the bug id?
[21:03] <mconnor> so what's going on?
[21:03] <mconnor> explain this a little better, I thought Fx's build config needed packages-static, why doesn't thunderbird's?
[21:04] <asac> i think its thunderbird 3 build system pain. with xul 1.9 firefox and xul moved its make install target to use packages-static
[21:04] <asac> right ... so thunderbird 3 does it different, we opened bug and they said they didnt want that
[21:04] <asac> but that was quite early ... i think a1 or something
[21:05] <fta> mozilla bug 420391
[21:05] <asac> i cannot remember all the details and since tbird 3 was still far far ahead i didnt really ran after it.
[21:05] <fta> it's assigned
[21:05] <asac> hmm
[21:06] <fta> but they are re-doing exactly the same thing that i did initially
[21:09] <asac> so its static vs. shared where ffox/tbird disagree/follow different path
[21:10] <fta> but the patch is still adding packages-static, which is what we need
[21:12] <[reed]> nom it for blocking and explain why this is hurting Ubuntu
[21:12] <asac> sorry i am too tired to understand why he suddenly agreed
[21:12] <asac> [reed]: maybe i misread that but seems that he complained and now submitted the same patch ... just improved.
[21:12] <asac> fta: ^^ is that correct?
[21:13] <asac> seems so ... good
[21:13] <fta> where is the improvement? it may be just more up-to-date
[21:13] <asac> fta: removed-files
[21:13] <asac> not sure if that is needed, but seems like it is
[21:13] <mconnor> it is
[21:14] <mconnor> otherwise you can have stuff lying around that causes problems
[21:14] <fta> so i will grab the patch and use that instead, i don't mind, i'm just sick of blindly maintaining this on my side
[21:14] <asac> fta: if its still up to date ;)
[21:15] <fta> we'll see
[21:15] <fta> compare is fixed now
[21:15] <asac> i think this should land ... once it does we can make hard compare and will notice any missing updates on daily builds
[21:15] <asac> which is quite nice
[21:16] <fta> that was the initial idea of compare, but even ff and xul keep forgetting stuff for a long while
[21:17] <asac> fta: yes, then we should fail hard on that and help maintaining those files
[21:18] <asac> its definitly better than what we had before where we had to add install: targets every other day ;)
[21:18] <fta> tricky with the xpt that seems to be bundled at install time
[21:18] <fta> -s
[21:18] <asac> fta: doesnt the removed-files file take care for cleanness?
[21:19] <fta> maybe, but compare 1st try dist/bin (unclean) vs debian/tmp (clean)
[21:21] <asac> fta: we can filter for known false positives
[21:22] <fta> possible, but still not ideal
[21:23] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/117018/ eh?? components/ and bin/components/ ?
[21:29] <asac> odd
[21:30] <fta> either that file completely changes, or the patch is seriously broken
[21:31] <fta> it adds the #ifdef unix inside a huge #ifdef xp with almost everything in it
[21:32] <fta> i don't get why all the xpt are in an xp block
[21:38] <fta> make[2]: Entering directory `/src/bzr/build-area/thunderbird-3.0-3.0~b2~hg20090210r1916+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/mail/installer'
[21:38] <fta> Makefile:72: *** you need a "--enable-static --disable-shared" build to package a build.  Stop.
[21:38] <fta> make[2]: Leaving directory `/src/bzr/build-area/thunderbird-3.0-3.0~b2~hg20090210r1916+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/mail/installer'
[21:38] <fta> make[1]: *** [install] Error 2
[21:38] <fta> grrrr
[21:39] <fta> obviously
[21:40] <fta> dropping that, it's bullshit
[21:48] <fta> asac, now, it wants me to remove all the .so in components
[21:57] <fta> asac, seems seriously broken to me: http://paste.ubuntu.com/117029/
[21:57] <fta> asac, no libxul ?
[22:11] <fta> my patch was better, it took care of tons of optional features from configure, the last patch in the bug totally missed that
[22:37] <fta> asac, help
[22:39] <fta> asac, it no longer starts, no error, no nothing: http://paste.ubuntu.com/117040/
[22:47] <asac> fta: cant we use your patch + remove-files?
[22:51] <fta> probably but i wanted to use their patch
[22:52] <fta> but it's non-sense
[22:52] <fta> they dropped all .so, but look: http://paste.ubuntu.com/117041/
[23:00] <fta> dtchen, help, my dell laptop is emitting continuous strident sounds when it used to emit a short system beep before. it's too easy to trigger, it makes me jump out of my chair
[23:01] <asac> heh ... so minefield now gives me annoying sounds when a alert pops up ;)
[23:02] <fta> me too
[23:02] <asac> canberra?
[23:02] <fta> probably
[23:02] <fta> beh?
[23:02] <fta> dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512
[23:02] <fta> make: *** [binary-predeb-IMPL/thunderbird-3.0] Error 1
[23:03] <asac> bad binaries ;)?
[23:05] <fta> no idea, retrying..
[23:07] <fta> same
[23:12] <fta> damn, i had libmozjs0d installed in that chroot, it was used during the build, i removed it, now everything is messed up now.
[23:12] <fta> i need to rebuild
[23:17] <asac> it used libmozjs0d? scary
[23:17] <asac> really
[23:18] <fta> yep, shlib even added it to Depends
[23:18] <fta>  thunderbird-3.0 depends on libmozjs0d (>= 1.8.1.5); however:
[23:18] <fta>   Package libmozjs0d is not installed.
[23:18] <fta> scary it is
[23:18] <asac> fta: but seems you had libmozjs-dev installed
[23:19] <asac> anyway ... -> xulrunner 1.9 _has_ to die
[23:19] <fta> 1.8 ?
[23:20] <fta> I had libmozjs-dev for some reasons, but i don't remember why
[23:21] <asac> 1.8 ;)
[23:23] <fta> what's left using it?
[23:25] <asac> too many things
[23:26] <asac> i have the feeling it got more in this cycle
[23:26] <asac> http://pastebin.com/fcf2eeb1
[23:26] <asac> http://pastebin.com/fcf2eeb1
[23:27] <asac> http://pastebin.com/f23213143
[23:27] <asac> the whole eclipse stack
[23:27] <asac> libswt3.2-gtk-jni
[23:27] <asac> libmozillainterfaces-java
[23:27] <asac> eclipse
[23:28] <asac> i would hope that that would go away by fixing eclipse
[23:28] <asac> (all three)
[23:28] <asac> #
[23:28] <asac>   mobile-basic-flash
[23:28] <asac> bah
[23:28] <asac> not sure why that hasnt moved forward
[23:28] <asac> mozjs is more interesting
[23:28] <asac> http://pastebin.com/fcf2eeb1
[23:28] <asac> mediatomb-common
[23:28] <asac> libjavascript-perl -> fta ?
[23:28] <asac> can you look if we can do something about that?
[23:28] <asac> maybe taking the js glue hack from google gadgets?
[23:29] <asac> gxine -> bah
[23:29] <asac> why is that again?
[23:29] <asac> edbrowse -> build system seems spartanic
[23:30] <asac> couchdb -> likewise .... glue hack has to come
[23:31] <asac> not sure what bfilter does
[23:31] <asac> seems they ship their own copy of libjs ... ouch
[23:32] <asac> fta: thats it i would hope
[23:32] <asac> maybe something rdepends on python-xpcom ;)
[23:32] <fta> hmm
[23:33] <asac> i think our xul should really ship some magic libmozjs-dev
[23:34] <asac> maybe i should put an empty package in before FF ;)
[23:34] <asac> and respin all those that currently rdepend
[23:34] <asac> and let them fail until motu fix it ;)
[23:35] <asac> i think people would consider that inpolite though ;)
[23:35] <fta> lol, why not, could be fun
[23:36] <fta> though a bit late
[23:38] <asac> fta: well ... if its now empty its not a missing feature but a bug ;) .... see the difference?
[23:39] <megabitdragon> is this the right place for questions about mozillateam launchpad ppa?