[15:00] <Ursinha> #startmeeting
[15:00] <Ursinha> Welcome to this week's Launchpad Production Meeting. For the next 45 minutes or so, we'll be coordinating the resolution of specific Launchpad bugs and issues.
[15:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 09:00. The chair is Ursinha.
[15:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[15:00] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] Roll Call
[15:00] <Ursinha> Not on the Launchpad Dev team? Welcome! Come "me" with the rest of us!
[15:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  Roll Call
[15:00] <Ursinha> me
[15:00] <bigjools> me
[15:00] <herb> me
[15:00] <henninge> me
[15:00] <intellectronica> me
[15:01] <Ursinha> rockstar, ping
[15:01] <rockstar> me
[15:01] <sinzui> me
[15:01] <Ursinha> is stub here?
[15:01] <Ursinha> flacoste, ping
[15:01] <flacoste> me
[15:02] <stub> yer
[15:02] <Ursinha> good :)
[15:02] <Ursinha> all here
[15:02] <Ursinha> moving on
[15:02] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] Agenda
[15:02] <Ursinha> * Actions from last meeting
[15:02] <Ursinha> * Oops report & Critical Bugs
[15:02] <Ursinha> * Operations report (mthaddon/herb/spm)
[15:02] <Ursinha> * DBA report
[15:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Agenda
[15:02] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Actions from last meeting
[15:02] <Ursinha> * losas and stub to fix rollout process to avoid the staging restore problems
[15:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  * Actions from last meeting
[15:02] <Ursinha> stub, herb, how was that?
[15:03] <stub> Pending
[15:03] <Ursinha> stub, plans to fix that soon?
[15:03] <herb> we are back to doing full restores though.
[15:03] <flacoste> and we have a fall-back non-replicated DB in case it fails
[15:04] <Ursinha> right, so it's, let's say, under control
[15:04] <flacoste> the in-place upgrade (without a DB restore) might still be broken though
[15:04] <stub> I plan to look at it tomorrow, but have a pretty full schedule and other things more time critical preempting it.
[15:04] <flacoste> and stub is supposed to investigate tomorrow
[15:04] <Ursinha> right
[15:05] <Ursinha> [action] stub to investigate the fix to avoid staging restore problems
[15:05] <MootBot> ACTION received:  stub to investigate the fix to avoid staging restore problems
[15:05] <Ursinha> next
[15:05] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Oops report & Critical Bugs
[15:05] <Ursinha> 4 oopses (soyuz, 2 bugs, code), 1 bug (registry)
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  * Oops report & Critical Bugs
[15:05] <Ursinha> bigjools, https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138B2582
[15:05] <Ursinha> bigjools, this is still happening, afaics
[15:05] <bigjools> oo that's a new one on me
[15:06] <Ursinha> new?
[15:06] <bigjools> in fact it's a bugs oops :)
[15:06]  * Ursinha looks if it's the right link
[15:06] <Ursinha> aww FAIL
[15:06] <Ursinha> sorry bigjools :)
[15:07] <Ursinha> intellectronica, let me show the bugs ones
[15:07] <Ursinha> intellectronica, this one, https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138B2582
[15:07] <Ursinha> and https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1137F2893, not sure if it's bugs though
[15:08] <Ursinha> the last one: https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138EC328
[15:08] <Ursinha> rockstar, are you awake enough to look an oops? :)
[15:08]  * rockstar grunts
[15:08] <Ursinha> rockstar, https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138CEMAIL12
[15:09] <rockstar> Ursinha, already filed a bug on that one, will be fixing it today.
[15:09] <Ursinha> rockstar, do you have the bug #?
[15:09] <rockstar> Ah man, it's early!
[15:09] <Ursinha> rockstar, sorry!
[15:10] <Ursinha> rockstar, right. stick to the fix and I'll find the number
[15:10] <Ursinha> thanks :)
[15:10] <Ursinha> [action] rockstar to fix https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138CEMAIL12
[15:10] <MootBot> ACTION received:  rockstar to fix https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138CEMAIL12
[15:10] <Ursinha> intellectronica, are you there?
[15:10] <intellectronica> Ursinha: looking at the oopses, sorry
[15:11] <Ursinha> sinzui, bug 237722 is happening lately
[15:11] <Ursinha> thanks ubottu
[15:12] <sinzui> Ursinha: I'll have someone look into it
[15:12] <Ursinha> sinzui, thanks
[15:12] <Ursinha> [action] sinzui to have someone to fix bug 237722
[15:13] <MootBot> ACTION received:  sinzui to have someone to fix bug 237722
[15:13] <Ursinha> just flooded intellectronica, have to wait for him :)
[15:13] <intellectronica> Ursinha: i have no idea what that publishTraverse thing is about
[15:14] <intellectronica> Ursinha: the two others i know. one is the result of changing a task's target, the other is some problem when reporting a bug with apport
[15:14] <Ursinha> intellectronica, not sure if that's foundations or bugs
[15:15] <Ursinha> intellectronica, do you want me to file bugs about those?
[15:15] <rockstar> Ursinha, bug 326056
[15:15] <intellectronica> Ursinha: yes, please. i'm also not sure about the publishTraverse error, but i can check and ask foundations for help if necessary
[15:15] <Ursinha> thanks rockstar :)
[15:16] <Ursinha> intellectronica, I'll file the bugs
[15:16] <Ursinha> intellectronica, and appreciate the investigation on the mysterious one
[15:17] <intellectronica> cool, thanks
[15:17] <Ursinha> [action] Ursinha to file bugs to https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138EC328 and https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138B2582
[15:17] <MootBot> ACTION received:  Ursinha to file bugs to https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138EC328 and https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1138B2582
[15:17] <Ursinha> [action] intellectronica to investigate https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1137F2893
[15:17] <MootBot> ACTION received:  intellectronica to investigate https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1137F2893
[15:17] <Ursinha> right
[15:18] <Ursinha> no critical bugs
[15:18] <Ursinha> moving on
[15:18] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Operations report (mthaddon/herb/spm)
[15:18] <MootBot> New Topic:  * Operations report (mthaddon/herb/spm)
[15:18] <herb> 2009-02-05 - We rolled out r44 to codebrowse.
[15:18] <herb> 2009-02-09 - Cherry picked r7716 to lpnet* and the scripts server.
[15:18] <herb> 2009-02-12 - Earlier today cherry picked r7721 to lpnet*.
[15:18] <herb> We continue to have problems with codebrowse relating to bug #156453 and bug #118625.
[15:18] <herb> We also continue to have problems related to #260171.
[15:19] <Ursinha> rockstar, do you know how's mwhudson work on bug 260171?
[15:21] <rockstar> All I know is that I've seen lots of reviews going through for loggerhead.  That basically all he's been working on.
[15:21] <Ursinha> rockstar, nice to know
[15:21] <Ursinha> I'll ask matsubara to talk to him about it today
[15:21] <Ursinha> thanks rockstar
[15:21] <Ursinha> herb, anything else?
[15:22] <herb> that's it. unless there are other questions.
[15:22] <Ursinha> questions for herb?
[15:22] <Ursinha> herb, I'll find out that bug  status and will let you know
[15:22] <herb> thanks Ursinha.
[15:22] <Ursinha> thanks herb
[15:22] <Ursinha> moving on
[15:22] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * DBA report (DBA contact)
[15:22] <MootBot> New Topic:  * DBA report (DBA contact)
[15:23] <stub> There is a backlog of DB patch reviews I need to process tomorrow and collate for Mark. If it isn't already, please make sure your branches appear on https://code.launchpad.net/~stub/+requestedreviews so I'm less likely to lose them :)
[15:23] <stub> The Slony-I replication stopped for a while yesterday. Nagios alert triggered elmo to trigger me. I restarted the replication daemons and monitored it while it resynced. Users didn't notice, except perhaps for a performance degredation.
[15:23] <stub> I don't know what the cause was, as we managed to lose the relevant logs. This was the first hiccup since we switched replication on, and everything recovered a it was supposed to, so I don't think we have anything to worry about. IS appears to have done the changes they needed to to stop us losing the logs last week, so I can now complete the processs (RT #32320 - switching to the /etc/init.d script to control the daemons rather than the h
[15:23] <stub> Staging is moving to a new hope 'in a few weeks', and demo can be resurrected then too. Yay!
[15:23] <Ursinha> \o/
[15:24] <stub> c/hope/home (Freudian slip!)
[15:24] <Ursinha> awesome to hear
[15:24] <Ursinha> ahahaha
[15:24] <Ursinha> anything for stub?
[15:24] <henninge> stub:
[15:24] <henninge> stub: I cannot access ~requestedreviews
[15:24] <flacoste> intellectronica: the publishTraverse things is caused because the user is going to +edit on the attachment and traversing to the attachement probably returns a RedirectionView
[15:24] <Ursinha> flacoste is the one who always have last minute notes :)
[15:25] <henninge> I get Unauthorized: (<Branch u'~barry/launchpad/affiliations-db' (35874)>, 'container', 'launchpad.View')<br />
[15:25] <Ursinha> ha!
[15:25] <stub> So just make sure you have a Pending review request to me personally (rather than a team)
[15:25] <intellectronica> flacoste: oh, i see
[15:25] <henninge> stub: okay
[15:26] <stub> I'll be checking the ~launchpad and ~launchpad-reviews lists too, but better safe than slipped
[15:26] <stub> And my mailbox queues
[15:26] <stub> And my todo list
[15:26] <henninge> :-D
[15:26] <Ursinha> :)
[15:26] <flacoste> to many places to check...
[15:26] <flacoste> something will be lost :-)
[15:26] <stub> Indeed. We need a code review system!
[15:26] <Ursinha> lol
[15:26] <flacoste> that's mean :-)
[15:27] <Ursinha> well
[15:27] <Ursinha> anything else?
[15:27] <Ursinha> 5
[15:27] <Ursinha> 4
[15:27] <Ursinha> 3
[15:27] <Ursinha> 2
[15:28] <Ursinha> 1
[15:28] <Ursinha> Thank you all for attending this week's Launchpad Production Meeting. See the channel topic for the location of the logs.
[15:28] <Ursinha> #endmeeting
[15:28] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 09:28.
[15:28] <flacoste> intellectronica: arguably, we could change RedirectionView to raise NotFound whenever publishTraverse is call, so that these kind of OOPses don't happen
[15:29] <intellectronica> flacoste: but, why can't we redirect and then traverse?
[15:29] <flacoste> intellectronica: for that kind of behaviour you want redirectSubtree
[15:29] <flacoste> intellectronica: which redirect to a URL and append everything after it
[15:29] <flacoste> intellectronica: but would that work in that case? where are you redirecting?
[15:30] <Ursinha> thanks all
[15:31] <intellectronica> flacoste: no idea, i wouldn't expect this to redirect