[07:37] <MTecknology> mrevell isn't around?? :(
[07:38] <MTecknology> or jono...
[07:38] <MTecknology> why do these people log off??
[07:39] <MTecknology> kiko-afk: you're not either?
[07:43] <kiko-afk> I am always around
[07:43] <kiko-afk> what's this "either" stuff? :)
[07:43] <kiko-afk> maybe you mean I'm not ether
[07:48] <MTecknology> kiko-afk: you don't need to be at the meeting - putting something on the wiki is enough
[07:49] <kiko-afk> that makes things much easier!!
[07:49] <MTecknology> sorry, did a /p instead of /pp
[07:49] <kiko-afk> where on the wiki?
[07:49] <MTecknology> Testimonials
[07:49] <MTecknology> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MTecknology#Testimonials
[07:49] <kiko-afk> kisses from the podium girls!
[07:49] <MTecknology> ?
[07:50] <kiko-afk> guess you're giving away that's not a podium
[07:50] <kiko-afk> fucking openid dance
[07:51] <kiko-afk> take back where I was!!
[07:51] <MTecknology> lol
[07:51] <MTecknology> I gotta head to sleep soon :(
[07:51] <MTecknology> and my battery is on its way to being dead
[07:52] <MTecknology> kiko-afk: thanks for doing that for me :)
[07:58] <MTecknology> kiko-afk: thanks :)
[07:59]  * MTecknology hugs kiko-afk firmly
[08:00] <kiko-afk> de rien
[08:03]  * MTecknology sleeps
[12:01] <sladen> Soyuz; (I might be being thick) is there anything special I have to do to get an Arch: all/any package to show up for amd64 aswell as i386?
[12:10] <wgrant> sladen: 'show up'?
[12:15] <sladen> "Binaries awaiting acceptance:"  Sorry, was conflating that with the "built on ... i386"
[12:16] <wgrant> Ah.
[12:24] <glade88> hello. How long does it usually take for reviewing and approving of a ML request at lists.ubuntu.com?
[12:34] <jpds> glade88: Did you send the email to rt@ubuntu.com ?
[12:35] <glade88> jpds: yes. few weeks back
[12:35] <jpds> glade88: Which mailing list did you want?
[12:35] <glade88> jpds: it is for a Brainstorm moderators ML
[12:35] <glade88> *ubuntu brainstorm
[12:36] <jpds> glade88: Which email address did you use in the request?
[12:36] <glade88> sayakb@ubuntu.com
[12:38] <jpds> glade88: I can see requests for other mailing lists, however nothing about Brainstorm - could you possibly resend?
[12:39] <glade88> jpds: sure, a min
[12:39] <jpds> glade88: Please send it to mailman@lists.ubuntu.com - so it gets sorted automatically.
[12:40] <glade88> jpds: ok
[12:41] <glade88> jpds: sent
[12:44] <jpds> glade88: Prefect, thanks.
[12:44]  * jpds assigns to jcastro for approval.
[12:44] <glade88> jpds: welcome and thanks! :)
[12:59] <encbladexp> morning
[12:59] <encbladexp> How can i build one Package (like https://launchpad.net/~encbladexp/+archive/ppa) for 1. Multiple Architectures, 2. Multiple Distribution Versions
[13:18] <geser> encbladexp: 1. it's automatically build for all (by PPA supported) architectures if the package is architecture specific (Architecture: any)
[13:19] <geser> 2. you need a seperate upload to your ppa for each distro version you want packages build
[13:41] <AlexC_> g'mroning
[13:41] <AlexC_> how can I give a person or  team permission to upload new translations and generally manage the translations part?
[14:02] <encbladexp> geser, how can i set Architecture to "any"?
[14:03] <nhandler> encbladexp: In debian/control
[14:04] <encbladexp> hmm, "Architecture: all"? Is "any" another thing than "all"?
[14:04] <nhandler> encbladexp: Yes. any is very different than all. For any, it is built separately on each architecture. For all, only one binary is built.
[14:04] <encbladexp> ok, i will change this to any
[14:05] <nhandler> encbladexp: What type of application is it?
[14:07] <encbladexp> pyNeighborhood
[14:07] <encbladexp> a Samba Browsing Tool
[14:08] <encbladexp> (a Python Application)
[14:08] <encbladexp> good, "dput -f pyneighborhood pyneighborhood_0.5.0.changes" has uploaded it again
[14:09] <encbladexp> the only Thing i need is that it will be Build for several Distribution Versions
[14:09] <encbladexp> how can i upload it for Multiple Versions?
[14:09]  * encbladexp ist absolutly new to PPA's an so on
[14:15] <nhandler> What do you mean by "build for several distribution versions"? Do you mean different versions of Ubuntu like jaunty, intrepid, hardy, etc?
[14:17] <encbladexp> exactly
[14:17] <domas> upload multiple source packages
[14:18] <nhandler> encbladexp: If this is your PPA, just modify debian/changelog to say intrepid instead of jaunty. Then upload. It will build it for intrepid
[14:18] <encbladexp> hmm, is it not possible to upload one Package only?
[14:19] <encbladexp> hmm, i will do so
[14:27] <geser> encbladexp: no, as you need a different version (slightly changing the packaging revision is enough) for each distro version
[14:41] <encbladexp> ok, i am correct if i say that i cannot upload the Same Packages Version different Times?
[14:43] <glade88> hello, I pushed to a new branch lp:~sayakb/ideatorrent/devel. The branch is created but I dont see the revision files
[14:43] <glade88> how long does it take to update
[14:43] <glade88> (I did about half an hour back)
[14:43] <glade88> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sayakb/ideatorrent/devel/files
[14:44] <AlexC_> hey, how can I let a team or person upload new translations?
[14:44] <glade88> AlexC_: you can set your project to "uses launchpad for translations"
[14:46] <AlexC_> glade88: I already have - I'm on about letting other people upload translation files, currently only I can
[14:51] <geser> encbladexp: yes, each version (consisting of upstream-version and pkg-revision) can only be uploaded once
[14:52] <encbladexp> thx, seems to work
[15:30] <jelmer> What does " Revision details not available for remote branches. " mean exactly? What are remote branches in this context?
[15:31] <jelmer> at least, remote branches seem to be different from mirrorred branches
[15:35] <savvas> jelmer: it would help to provide a link to show what you mean :)
[15:38] <grow-as-apple> i need to remove my account but i has forgot which e-mail address i used to sign it up. Need help. Can not do it myself.
[16:21] <beuno> jelmer, AIUI, remote branches aren't imported, just tracked. Mirrored are imported.
[16:40] <encbladexp> good, my PPA's working
[16:40] <encbladexp> can i create a PPA for my Project (https://launchpad.net/pyneighborhood)?
[16:53] <RainCT> Hey
[16:53] <RainCT> Congrats on all the Ajax stuff you're adding, that's cool :)
[16:54] <RainCT> but.. am I the first to tell you that the red/green thingies look awful? :P
[17:14] <RainCT> uhm.. right.. weekend :P
[17:26] <beuno> RainCT, accept and cancel buttons?
[17:29] <RainCT> beuno: no, the red/green background which the content gets and which then fades out
[17:29] <beuno> RainCT, why does it look awful?
[17:30] <beuno> looks pretty damn good here
[17:31] <RainCT> beuno: Uhm well, I guess it's a matter of taste.. But I (and at least someone else I've spoken with) don't really like that red/green box jumping into one's face :P
[17:31] <RainCT> but well, just a random comment, feel free to ignore it :)
[17:32] <beuno> RainCT, how would you portray success or failure?
[17:34] <RainCT> no idea :)
[17:34] <beuno> :)
[17:35] <RainCT> ah, and another thing.. isn't the timeout for fetching info in the PPA page a bit too high?
[17:36] <beuno> you want it to timeout earlier?
[17:36] <RainCT> when an item fails to load (happened twice to me so far) it's way faster to reload the page and click on it again than to wait for the "retry" link to come up
[17:36] <RainCT> but perhaps the real problem is, in the first place, that it fails to load
[17:37] <beuno> I see what you mean. Yeah, it really shouldn't fail to load as much. That should be fixed in the next release
[17:38] <RainCT> great
[17:38] <RainCT> Thanks for your time. And, even if I don't like the green/red box, keep up the good work! ;)
[17:46] <beuno> thanks RainCT
[17:59] <AlexC_> hey,
[17:59] <AlexC_> is there a way I can let a person and/or team upload/manage translations files? Currently only I can upload new ones, which is quite a pain
[18:12] <Turl> hello
[18:12] <Turl> I think I found a bug in PPAs :p
[18:14] <Turl> upload a package and let it build. then, when it's build upload a newer version and delete it when it hasn't still been built for all archs. Both packages are gone
[18:19] <MTecknology> kiko-afk: "I am overburdened! Call me in 2009! " may wanna update?
[18:25] <glade88> jcastro: thanks for approving! :) should I be receiving a mailman message with the ML password?
[18:40] <MTecknology> How can I make a sub branch?
[18:57] <alefteris> wouldn't be better if people with out set location where prepented bellow the map? if a team has a lot of them, tha page looks ugly
[19:08] <jcastro> glade88: yeah someone will send something to you
[19:19] <glade88> jcastro: ok. ty
[22:18] <rickspencer3> anyone online that can help me with the python launchpadlib?
[22:24] <wgrant> rickspencer3: It's a weekend, so there are no real Launchpad people around. I might be able to help, though.
[22:25] <rickspencer3> wgrant: thanks
[22:25] <rickspencer3> i'm doing some weekend hacking, and thought I'd check in
[22:25] <rickspencer3> but I
[22:26] <rickspencer3> but I'll try back on Tuesday prolly
[22:30] <kiko-afk> rickspencer3, what's up?
[22:32] <rickspencer3> hey kiko
[22:32] <rickspencer3> I'm trying to figure out how to use the api to get all the bugs that are a) assigned to a member of my team b) targeted to a release
[22:32] <rickspencer3> I an do "a" easily, but can't figure out how to get "b" through the python api
[22:38] <Ursinha> rickspencer3, you should check the api docs to see how the searchTasks method work
[22:39]  * Ursinha opens the docs
[22:39] <rickspencer3> Ursinha: thanks for the tip. I've been over the api docs again and again, and probed the api within a python shell, but haven't been able to determine how to test if it's targeted for a relase
[22:40] <rickspencer3> I can see if it's been *nominated*, I can see if it's milestoned, but not actually targeted for a release
[22:40] <Ursinha> rickspencer3, hmm, that I don't know either :/
[22:40] <Ursinha> I know it works for milestones
[22:40] <Ursinha> as you said
[22:40] <rickspencer3> perhaps this is not a use case :P
[22:41] <rickspencer3> I'd rather use the api then screenscrape :)
[22:41] <Ursinha> rickspencer3, I may be wrong, but maybe a milestone is the target of a release?..
[22:41] <Ursinha> ohhh no doubt about that :D
[22:41] <rickspencer3> Ursinha: not quute
[22:41] <rickspencer3> a developer can milestone a bug ...
[22:41] <rickspencer3> meaning they want to fix it in that milestone ...
[22:41] <Ursinha> right
[22:41] <rickspencer3> but if it's targeted for a release, it means that the release manager is mandating it be fixed ...
[22:42] <rickspencer3> so milestoned + targeted means that it must be fixed for that milestone to ship (i.e. to press CDs)
[22:42] <wgrant> The release is a separate task.
[22:42] <wgrant> On a separate context.
[22:42] <rickspencer3> just milestoned means that it's just a goal the developer set for themselves
[22:42] <wgrant> So do a searchTasks() on that context.
[22:45] <rickspencer3> wgrant: so I do distribution.current_series.searchTasks() instead of disribution.searchTask() ?
[22:45] <wgrant> rickspencer3: Correct.
[22:46]  * rickspencer3 trying that with anticipation
[22:53] <rickspencer3> hmmm
[23:00] <wgrant> rickspencer3: It didn't work?
[23:00] <rickspencer3> still working on it
[23:00] <rickspencer3> You have to include omit_targeted  = False or you get no results
[23:00] <wgrant> You do, yes.
[23:01] <wgrant> Forgot to tell you that, sorry.
[23:01] <wgrant> I think there's a bug on that.
[23:01] <wgrant> Bug #304677
[23:02] <rickspencer3> wgrant: thanks for this
[23:02] <rickspencer3> I've got to poke at it a little more
[23:02] <wgrant> np
[23:02] <rickspencer3> but I;m waaaay closer now
[23:04] <thekorn> looks like a duplicate of bug 320596
[23:05] <wgrant> Other way around, but yes.
[23:15] <rickspencer3> wgrant: why does ...
[23:15] <rickspencer3> self.distro.current_series.searchTasks(assignee = m, milestone = None, omit_targeted  = False) ...
[23:15] <rickspencer3> return all the bug_tasks for the assignee, and not just the bug_tasks that aren't in a milestone?
[23:16] <wgrant> Probably because None == do not care, not none.
[23:17] <rickspencer3> oh
[23:19] <wgrant> rickspencer3: The documentation for that is just wonderful, so you might try milestone_assignment or similar.
[23:20] <wgrant> Or complain to a Launchpad dev that their documentation and API are lacking.
[23:21] <rickspencer3> wgrant: I think the api is just a little raw and early, so I'll provide some feedback once I get my use case going
[23:22] <wgrant> I'd make the milsetone kwarg take an iterable of milestones or None, I think.
[23:34] <thekorn> yes a working 'None' as argument would be really nice
[23:40] <thekorn> oh, the milestone parameter already accepts a list of milestones, did not know that
[23:43] <rickspencer3> thekorn: yes, but then what if you want to retrieve the bugtasks that aren't milestoned?
[23:43] <rickspencer3> however, I;m just using the milestone_link property on the bug task, so it's not actually a problem for me now
[23:51] <rickspencer3> wgrant: thank you, so much. The "context" tip was exactly what I needed!
[23:51] <rickspencer3> I've got it all working now