=== |Ryan52 is now known as Ryan52
[05:10] <Ryan52> bug 329948
[05:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 329948 in ubuntu "Someone please help me out." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/329948
[05:10] <Ryan52> oh, yes, that's a bug.
[05:10]  * maco giggles at title
[05:10] <Ryan52> :)
[05:46] <dholbach> good morning
[05:49] <maco> hello ther
[05:49] <dholbach> hi maco
=== BugMaN1 is now known as BugMaN
=== rip__ is now known as blbox
=== Rafik_ is now known as Rafik
[11:45] <davmor2> Guys on intrepid does anyone else get an error when using System->Preferences->Keyboard to add a new keyboard language?
[11:49] <stgraber> davmor2: hey, if you happen to do some testing before alpha-5, can you do a quick LTSP test, see if it now goes past the installer ?
[11:49] <stgraber> davmor2: (I'm supposed to get fast internet really soon now, that'll help :))
[11:50] <davmor2> stgraber: I'm doing some smoke testing this afternoon so I'll add it for you :)
[11:51] <davmor2> stgraber: can you do a quick test on keyboard and let me know if you get an error adding a new layout please
[11:54] <stgraber> davmor2: seems too work though selecting it doesn't actually switch to the new layout
[11:55] <stgraber> davmor2: I had US-int on this one and added Swiss french
[11:55] <davmor2> Meh just an issue here then :)
[11:55] <davmor2> stgraber: thanks :)
[11:55] <stgraber> np
[11:58] <philsf> can someone who understands kernel backtraces please take a look at the following dmesg and give me a hint of what's goiing on? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21975410/dmesg.log it's from Bug #325238, where there are other debugging information and attachments
[11:59] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 325238 in linux "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/325238
[12:04] <stgraber> philsf: looks like memory issue, the call trace doesn't show anything driver-specific
[12:04] <stgraber> philsf: if that's your computer, did you try a memtest on it ? if it's not your, maybe you should suggest the reporter to do it
[12:05] <philsf> stgraber:
[12:05] <philsf> stgraber: I did a memtest, yes
[12:05] <philsf> I can do a longer one
[12:05] <philsf> I did 3 or 4 passes only
[12:05] <stgraber> ok, may be something in the kernel then
[12:06] <stgraber> you should try to ping ogasawara when she wakes up (west coast
[12:06] <philsf> the machine is now working, after I removed the nvidia card
[12:06] <stgraber> oh, did you also get the bug with the nvidia card but without the binary driver ?
[12:06] <stgraber> (just trying to isolate the issue there)
[12:07] <philsf> well, I booted the livecd, does it already try the binary driver?
[12:09] <philsf> stgraber: will it suffice to remove nvidia-glx-new package, or should I remove nvidia-*?
[12:10] <stgraber> no, the livecd doesn't contain the binary driver
[12:10] <stgraber> so if you get the bug with the livecd, then it's not the binary driver that's at fault
[12:11] <philsf> I'm open to suggestions :)
[12:11] <stgraber> meaning that the kernel team is probably interested in hearing about your bug (they can't fix issues with the binary driver but they can for pretty much everything else)
[12:11] <philsf> I tried with two optial media: a cd and a dvd, both hardy
[12:12] <philsf> good to hear, thanks. I'll try #ubuntu-kernel again in a while. no one responded there when I asked
[12:13] <BUGabundo> philsf: they are like that: a tad slow
[12:13] <BUGabundo> but if you wait they will reply
[12:13] <stgraber> philsf: try asking ogasawara in 3-4 hours
[12:13] <BUGabundo> busy ppl I guess
[12:14] <philsf> yes, and I'm in wrong timezone :) thanks stgraber
[12:18] <ogra> BUGabundo, well, some of us tend to sleep at night :)
[12:18] <ogra> you could make a proposal to sleep faster :P
[12:19] <stgraber> ogra: 48h days ? :)
[12:19] <ogra> heh
[12:20] <BUGabundo> eheh
[12:20] <philsf> for those who exclusively work online, there's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/28-hour_day
[12:20] <BUGabundo> ogra is EVERYONE on that channel sleeping ? eheeh
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
[13:18] <Hew> seb128: What should we do about bug 254671? There are now 8 Jaunty dupes for it. Is it a problem with the retracer?
[13:18] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 254671 in gnome-desktop "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in gdk_x_error()" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/254671
[13:18] <seb128> Hew: it's not a problem with the retracer but that stacktace seems to indicate that something is crashing somewhere in the gsd code
[13:19] <seb128> Hew: it doesn't mean that's the same crasher than the one fixed, better to have a new bug about the jaunty issue
[13:19] <seb128> Hew: it's confusing to mix fixed issues and new similar ones
[13:20] <Hew> seb128: Yes, I left it for a few days because I was unsure, but there are more and more. I guess I should take the first new bug and make the rest dupes of that?
[13:20] <seb128> right
[13:20] <seb128> and if you get the issue open an upstream bug
[13:21] <Hew> will do, but I haven't experienced it yet
[14:37] <drguildo> is it just me or is there no pixmap engine available for the amd64 architecture?
[15:06] <bddebian> Boo
[15:09] <BUGabundo1> foo
[15:09] <bddebian> :)
[15:16] <BUGabundo1> now to find ogasawara
[15:16] <BUGabundo1> ogasawara: ping
[15:16] <BUGabundo1> I have here a friend with a laptop from Insys
[15:17] <BUGabundo1> with a SIS board
[15:17] <BUGabundo1> I'm having trouble getting eth (or pretty much anything) working
[15:17] <BUGabundo1> to install via wubi, I had to disable acpi
[15:18] <BUGabundo1> using ubuntu 8.10 FYI
[15:18] <BUGabundo1> any tips on how to get this working? or should he just forget about it?
[15:23] <BUGabundo> bddebian: did my messages show up?
[15:23] <BUGabundo> or was I down?
[15:24] <bddebian> This is the last one I have from you: <BUGabundo1> any tips on how to get this working? or should he just forget about it?
[15:25] <BUGabundo> thanks
[15:25] <BUGabundo> that's it
[15:26] <BUGabundo> IRC went down, so I wasn't sure it had it the #
[15:26] <BUGabundo> now to get some feedback on this
=== _gunni_ is now known as gunni
[15:56] <thomasdelbeke> Hi there
[15:56] <thomasdelbeke> Plz take a look at this:
[15:57] <thomasdelbeke> http://paste.ubuntu.com/118866/
[15:57] <thomasdelbeke> I had previously posted this:
[15:57] <thomasdelbeke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/belpic/+bug/320480
[15:57] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 320480 in belpic "beidgui crashes on "no locale NL" because it is not installed; problem is: it cannot be revoked, not even by apt-get --reinstall install" [Undecided,New]
[15:58] <thomasdelbeke> But it now seems that the nl locale thing is not the cause
[15:58] <thomasdelbeke> I re-experienced it in a new stable 8.10 partition
[15:59] <thomasdelbeke> Is it by any chance the same as this(?):
[15:59] <thomasdelbeke> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=691387
[16:00] <thomasdelbeke> Do I need to close the old one or reformulate the title?
[16:04] <thomasdelbeke> Hi there,
[16:04] <thomasdelbeke> anyone can help me with it?
[16:04] <thomasdelbeke> Or wrong channel?
[16:05] <BUGabundo> thomasdelbeke: with what?
[16:05] <thomasdelbeke> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=691387
[16:06] <thomasdelbeke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/belpic/+bug/320480
[16:06] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 320480 in belpic "beidgui crashes on "no locale NL" because it is not installed; problem is: it cannot be revoked, not even by apt-get --reinstall install" [Undecided,New]
[16:06] <BUGabundo> no idea
[16:06] <thomasdelbeke> http://paste.ubuntu.com/118866/
[16:06] <thomasdelbeke> what it is you mean?
[16:07] <thomasdelbeke> I filed this a while ago
[16:07] <thomasdelbeke> I was wondering what to do with it?
[16:07] <thomasdelbeke> Should I ask on another channel?
[16:08] <thomasdelbeke> Anyway
[16:08] <thomasdelbeke> I think it is the same bug
[16:08] <thomasdelbeke> So I should change the title?
[16:09] <thomasdelbeke> Or attach the new gdb report to the old bug report?
[16:09] <thomasdelbeke> You see...
[16:09] <thomasdelbeke> I do not know what these backtraces mean really...
[16:12] <thomasdelbeke> Anyone there still?
[16:12] <BUGabundo> I am
[16:12] <thomasdelbeke> oh
[16:12] <BUGabundo> but I don't have anything to add
[16:12] <thomasdelbeke> sorry
[16:12] <thomasdelbeke> So I just leave it as it is then?
[16:13] <thomasdelbeke> anyway, see you later then
[16:13] <thomasdelbeke> bye
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
=== LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox
[17:37] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: are you here?
[17:38] <pedro_> BUGabundo: according to her away message she is not around, it's a holiday on the US IIRC
[17:38] <BUGabundo> oh
[17:38] <BUGabundo> anybody else here can help me debug a friends laptop?
[17:38] <BUGabundo> wired card buggy
[17:38] <BUGabundo> prob Linux support
[17:39] <BUGabundo> its a SYS based laptop
[17:39] <pedro_> try asking on #ubuntu-kernel , they might know how to debug such issues
[17:39] <BUGabundo> thanks pedro_
[17:39] <pedro_> you're welcome
=== pedro__ is now known as pedro_
=== maco is now known as _010100
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== _010100 is now known as maco
[20:33] <joumetal> hi. any opinions about right package to bug 325121 ?
[20:33] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 325121 in ubuntu "Ubuntu Jauntyalpha 3 does not boot from Live CD" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/325121
[20:42] <petski> joumetal: could be a duplicate of 296710
=== Hurtz_ is now known as Hurtz
[20:53] <joumetal> petski: maybe but in 296710 boot doesn't freeze.
[20:58] <petski> there's a lot of information in 296710 that could be helpful for 325121
=== ogra is now known as waldorf
=== waldorf is now known as ogra
=== ivoks_ is now known as ivoks
[22:40] <porthose> Would Bug #227631 be a SRU candidate? or should I just set the bug to "fix released" as the current jaunty version has been updated to imagemagick-7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3?
[22:40] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 227631 in imagemagick "identify reports every single EXIF tag as empty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/227631
[22:42] <persia> porthose, It's worth marking it Fix Released if it's fixed in Jaunty, even if it is an SRU candidate.
[22:42] <persia> If you think it meets the SRU criteria, nominate it for affected releases.
[22:42] <porthose> persia: ok will do that thx :)
[22:43] <persia> porthose, More generally, all bugs should initially be considered bugs in the current development release, and if fixed there, marked Fix Released.  Where they are important to fix in other releases, they are nominated, but this is significantly less common.
[22:44] <persia> (yes, this means there are about 5,000 bugs that should be marked Fixed)
[22:45] <porthose> hahaha thanks persia
[23:07] <iflema> ;)\
[23:12] <iflema> whats the release date on 9.04
[23:13] <persia> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JauntyReleaseSchedule
[23:13] <iflema> ta
[23:15] <iflema> nice work by the way