[07:07] <ara> morning all :)
[10:00] <davmor2> Morning All by the way :) (greeting on a go slow today)
[10:05] <ara> davmor2: hey!
[10:05]  * ara takes a break to prepare coffee
[10:10] <davmor2> Hmmm COFFEE Hmmmmm
[12:00]  * ara -> lunch
[12:19] <davmor2> schwuk: ping
[12:31] <schwuk> davmor2: sup?
[12:32] <davmor2> Dave Murphy: Do you know how to setup vpn inside of n-m?
[12:36] <schwuk> davmor2: I've done it before, but I wouldn't say I know how.
[12:37] <davmor2> Meh :(
[12:54] <NY152> bonjour
[12:59] <davmor2> hello
[15:23] <davmor2> ara: nice write up :)
[15:23] <ara> davmor2: ta :)
[16:45] <manjo> cr3, ping
[16:52] <cr3> manjo: pong, hey dude!
[16:52] <manjo> cr3, how is lovely montreal ?
[16:52] <cr3> manjo: snowy, it's great
[16:52] <manjo> cr3, I have a Q abt the cert suite
[16:53] <cr3> manjo: shoot!
[16:53] <manjo> when it reports back the results does it use port 8080 ?
[16:53] <manjo> or some other port ?
[16:53] <cr3> it reports to the certification website which runs under https, 443
[16:53] <manjo> crap
[16:53] <cr3> it supports proxying though, http_proxy and https_proxy environment variables
[16:54] <manjo> I have a situation on a server I am trying to certify where its hooked up to external network but all ports except 8080 are blocked
[16:54] <manjo> so I cant shh etc to outside world
[16:55] <manjo> only web traffic will go thro
[16:55] <cr3> manjo: it's got to have a proxy on the network
[16:55] <manjo> right I need to figure that out
[16:56] <manjo> cr3, cool that is what I wanted to know I might ping you again later
[16:57] <cr3> manjo: try telneting to port 3128 on the gateway, that might give you a quick answer
[16:57]  * manjo makes a note 
[16:57] <cr3> the proxy isn't necessarily on the gateway, obviously, but it's a shot in the dark
[17:00] <manjo> cr3, I need to install https://certification.canonical.com/download/checkbox-compatibility_0.2_all.deb right ?
[17:01] <cr3> manjo: yep, but if you're running the tests from remote, you'll need the cli which I don't think is available from that url
[17:01] <manjo> k. which I can get from
[17:01] <cr3> manjo: moment, trying to figure out where would be most appropriate...
[17:02] <cr3> manjo: man, I've been trying to figure out a proper way to centralize these packages and this might be a good time. how much time do you give me?
[17:02] <manjo> :) till tomorrow
[17:03]  * manjo knows its too short 
[17:03] <manjo> checkbox_cli ?
[17:10] <cr3> manjo: checkbox-compatibility-cli, it's not hidden under that download/ directory
[17:37] <bdmurray> davmor2: do you have a vfat wubi install?
[17:57] <davmor2> bdmurray: not at the moment.  Is the new wubi in place?
[17:59] <davmor2> bdmurray: Why?
[18:04] <bdmurray> I've written a bug pattern to prevent filing of a certain bug report but really should test it before implementing it. ;-)
[18:05] <davmor2> bdmurray: does it need to be vfat or can it be ntfs?
[18:06] <bdmurray> davmor2: it needs to be vfat, I have an ntfs partition and couldn't recreate the bug
[18:07] <davmor2> bdmurray: I can set one up by by the time I get all the updates etc I'm not sure I'd have time to test.  I can do it tomorrow for you if that is okay?
[18:08] <bdmurray> davmor2: absolutely, its not a huge hurry - its easy enough to duplicate the bugs after they come in
[18:09] <davmor2> bdmurray: Bugger global bug jam I won't be here :( I'll be in Birmingham
[18:10] <bdmurray> heh, next is fine too
[18:10] <bdmurray> er, next week is fine too
[18:10] <davmor2> bdmurray: Right I'll set it up monday morning in the mean time I'll find out if the new wubi is in Jaunty as it needs testing if it is anyway :)
[18:11] <davmor2> bdmurray: Otherwise I'll have to do and intrepid wubi install
[18:13] <bdmurray> any release on vfat would be fine
[18:19] <davmor2> bdmurray: Right I'll ping you monday afternoon and see if your about then :)
[18:19] <bdmurray> davmor2: great, thanks!
[18:20] <davmor2> np's