| asac | tbird 3 dailies should be fixed in branch | 10:15 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | fta: ^^ | 10:15 |
| asac | please reenable | 10:15 |
| asac | and maybe give it an extra run today | 10:15 |
| asac | fta: lease please pleaes test my fontconfig fixes | 10:39 |
| asac | i want to be sure about what kind of regressions folks that actually see font-issues (i am too blind for that) see before doing it | 10:40 |
| asac | fta: they are are ~mozillateam PPA | 10:40 |
| asac | fta: just assume that your obsolete files get removed by package ... toherwise i plan to just upload it | 10:49 |
| fta | asac, the problem is that i have dropped one or two files in fontconfig, so i don't remember how to reproduce | 11:10 |
| asac | fta: yeah. just --reinstall fontconfig-config | 11:11 |
| asac | fta: then check the conffile list | 11:11 |
| asac | fta: oh. also run dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config | 11:11 |
| asac | and select the defaults | 11:11 |
| fta | one guy said the liberation fonts are ugly now | 11:12 |
| asac | liberation fonts? | 11:12 |
| asac | with my package? | 11:12 |
| fta | yes | 11:13 |
| fta | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-mozillateam/2009-February/000626.html | 11:13 |
| asac | fta: yeah. i think thats expected. I probably dropped some ttf tweakage | 11:42 |
| asac | well ... not expected, but now that someone complained i think i know what to look at | 11:42 |
| fta | asac, so for tb3, you basically did what sm2 is doing, i.e, drop the mega xpt and ship all the small ones individually. right? | 11:47 |
| fta | unlike xul and ff | 11:47 |
| fta | i still don't understand why my stuff was broken, <sigh> .. | 11:52 |
| LLStarks | rawr. | 11:56 |
| LLStarks | why is british spelling default for firefox spellcheck? | 11:57 |
| LLStarks | brb. ext4 is acting up again. | 12:01 |
| asac | fta: basically yes. | 12:25 |
| asac | and thats even supported by packager.mk | 12:25 |
| asac | so we just need to not make the test fatal | 12:26 |
| asac | and all is good | 12:26 |
| asac | currently have the hack in the removed-files | 12:26 |
| asac | we should make that sensible to STATIC or !STATIC too there | 12:26 |
| asac | instead of ifndef XP_UNIX ;) | 12:26 |
| LLStarks | asac, before i fire off 3 different bugs to the firefox packagers... i need your insight. | 12:28 |
| gnomefreak | why do i get the feeling that i would need to run autoconf2.13 when building for a different version of ubuntu? | 12:28 |
| LLStarks | why is en-gb the default? | 12:28 |
| gnomefreak | it is? | 12:28 |
| asac | LLStarks: cant remember right now | 12:29 |
| LLStarks | <___< | 12:29 |
| gnomefreak | i thought it followed the rules of the system default locale | 12:29 |
| asac | i think its rather random | 12:29 |
| asac | we ship both dics in the same package and ffox picks first seen | 12:29 |
| asac | gnomefreak: tbird 3 is fixed ;) ... so new tbird might be there tomorrow | 12:30 |
| gnomefreak | asac: thanks | 12:30 |
| thunderstruck | you have got to be kidding me | 12:33 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| gnomefreak | crashes now connection. my day is starting to suck badly | 12:34 |
| asac | kidding? | 12:35 |
| asac | why ;)? | 12:35 |
| gnomefreak | first my timer crashed now my connection is bad i have been here for all of 5 minutes and this happens what else can go wrong | 12:37 |
| asac | fta: do you know why we dont do a static build? do we explicitly opt-out somehow or is that just not the default for tbird? | 12:37 |
| asac | i guess its the later ... but since folks in the bug sounded a bit like that they think static is right, that souds a bit wierd at the same time | 12:37 |
| LLStarks | ack. how do i reset fontconfig? the patch is breaking subpixel as much as it is fixing it. | 12:39 |
| asac | LLStarks: no change? | 12:40 |
| asac | LLStarks: so ... dpkg --query fontconfig-config | grep obsolete | 12:40 |
| asac | what files do you get there? | 12:40 |
| LLStarks | i'm getting the red tinge around my fonts | 12:40 |
| LLStarks | query is not a valid argument. <_< | 12:41 |
| asac | LLStarks: try --status ;) | 12:41 |
| LLStarks | http://pastebin.com/m57cc0dbc | 12:42 |
| LLStarks | thx | 12:42 |
| asac | LLStarks: ok. and ls /etc/fonts/conf.d/ ? | 12:42 |
| LLStarks | http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/7804/thehorrorofsubpixel.png | 12:43 |
| LLStarks | chew on that for a second | 12:43 |
| thunderstruck | oh this is going to piss me off. i may not be here long | 12:43 |
| LLStarks | look at the pastebin output box | 12:43 |
| LLStarks | (top box) | 12:43 |
| asac | LLStarks: ok. thats monospace font | 12:43 |
| asac | are all but the monospace fonts ok? | 12:43 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| asac | LLStarks: does it help if you zoom in? | 12:43 |
| asac | e.g. ctrl-+ | 12:44 |
| asac | (for two times) | 12:44 |
| LLStarks | WORSE | 12:44 |
| LLStarks | wait | 12:44 |
| LLStarks | nvm i was looking at the screenshot | 12:44 |
| asac | LLStarks: dont zoom the pic ;) | 12:44 |
| asac | lol | 12:44 |
| LLStarks | still worse for the actual window | 12:44 |
| LLStarks | actually, a bit better | 12:45 |
| LLStarks | want a screenie? | 12:45 |
| LLStarks | http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/3912/zoom2x.png | 12:46 |
| LLStarks | ls output: http://pastebin.com/m1af92e37 | 12:46 |
| asac | LLStarks: what settings are you using in the fonts preferences? | 12:46 |
| asac | just the default "subpixel (best for LCD" | 12:47 |
| asac | or did you tweak something in the "Details..:" | 12:47 |
| LLStarks | http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/875/screenshotfonts.png | 12:48 |
| * gnomefreak away while update install than maybe email and i will work on seamonkey bullshit tomorrow | 12:48 | |
| LLStarks | http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/9696/screenshotfontrendering.png | 12:48 |
| asac | LLStarks: can you please paste the content of /etc/fonts/conf.avail/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf | 12:48 |
| asac | LLStarks: also did you paste the ls /etc/fonts/fonts.d yet? | 12:48 |
| LLStarks | yeah i did | 12:49 |
| LLStarks | ls output: http://pastebin.com/m1af92e37 | 12:49 |
| asac | LLStarks: and the .conf? | 12:50 |
| LLStarks | one sec | 12:50 |
| LLStarks | http://pastebin.com/m1d2160a8 | 12:51 |
| LLStarks | ny times rendering: http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/1774/screenshotadvertisingtr.png | 12:51 |
| LLStarks | notice the orange and blue tinge? | 12:51 |
| asac | LLStarks: yeah. | 12:52 |
| asac | (not the orange) | 12:52 |
| asac | the yeah was about something else | 12:52 |
| asac | please do: sudo ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf | 12:53 |
| asac | and see if things change | 12:53 |
| LLStarks | btw, was the times page monospaced? | 12:53 |
| LLStarks | no difference. do i need to do anything? | 12:54 |
| asac | yes | 12:54 |
| asac | restart stuff | 12:54 |
| LLStarks | system or applications? | 12:54 |
| asac | usually changing zoom also makes the new font stuff apply | 12:55 |
| asac | LLStarks: are you using ffox 3.0` | 12:55 |
| asac | ? | 12:55 |
| LLStarks | yah | 12:55 |
| LLStarks | damn it cnn. you guys are obsessed with tropicana too? | 12:55 |
| asac | LLStarks: well. then all this isnt for you | 12:55 |
| asac | its for those apps that really honour fontconfig/gnome | 12:55 |
| asac | LLStarks: better try ffox 3.1 or 3.2 | 12:56 |
| asac | from ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily | 12:56 |
| asac | LLStarks: and also the gnome experience is what bothers me most. are there regressions over the previous package on the other desktop apps ;) | 12:56 |
| LLStarks | one sec.. | 12:56 |
| asac | https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive | 12:56 |
| LLStarks | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Shiretoko/3.1b3pre | 12:57 |
| LLStarks | that's daily, right? | 12:57 |
| asac | would think so | 12:57 |
| asac | if thats installed as a pacakge at least | 12:57 |
| asac | if you downloaded fom mozilla it should be ok to test with it ... but i am not 100% sure | 12:58 |
| LLStarks | at any rate, 3.1 shares the subpixel woes. | 12:58 |
| LLStarks | the antialiasing is a lot better though. | 12:58 |
| asac | LLStarks: i think one issue is with small fonts | 12:59 |
| asac | e.g. bitstream vera does not support subpixel for small sizes (< 9?) | 12:59 |
| asac | so there is a rule that disables it for small fonts | 12:59 |
| LLStarks | lemme give you pic of the mozilla homepage with zoom | 12:59 |
| LLStarks | http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7039/ughhhhhh.png | 13:00 |
| LLStarks | look at the text near the cursor | 13:00 |
| asac | yeah. i see that there is some color | 13:01 |
| asac | LLStarks: hmm ... maybe subpixel order setting is a rpboelm? | 13:02 |
| LLStarks | orange L | 13:02 |
| asac | check fonts details | 13:02 |
| LLStarks | http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/9696/screenshotfontrendering.png | 13:03 |
| LLStarks | full hinting seems to 'fix' the problem | 13:05 |
| asac | LLStarks: does this change on higher/lower zoom level | 13:05 |
| asac | seems i see a bit of red too at a certain zoom level | 13:05 |
| gnomefreak | quick bash script question: how would i launch a tab in terminal? i have it to launch gnometerminal but not sure how to make it open a tab | 13:05 |
| asac | but all other zoom levels dont have this problem | 13:06 |
| LLStarks | does what change? | 13:06 |
| asac | LLStarks: the colorful subpixel mess up ;) | 13:06 |
| LLStarks | with full hinting? | 13:06 |
| asac | LLStarks: no. zoom out or in a bit more | 13:07 |
| asac | do you see the same effect on all zoom levels? | 13:07 |
| LLStarks | with the default slight hinting? | 13:07 |
| asac | yeah | 13:07 |
| asac | maybe tune the hinting too | 13:07 |
| LLStarks | if i zoom in far enough with slight hinting, the colors dissipate slightly. | 13:08 |
| LLStarks | it still remains though, but less noticeable | 13:09 |
| LLStarks | but this is zoom x5 | 13:09 |
| LLStarks | at least | 13:09 |
| asac | so seems we need full hinting for large font sizes | 13:09 |
| asac | medium for medium and slight for small ones | 13:09 |
| asac | LLStarks: btw, after changing settings, just zoom will really apply the new settings - at least for me ;) | 13:11 |
| LLStarks | sounds like a headache. | 13:11 |
| LLStarks | (with regard to hinting) | 13:11 |
| asac | its a bit of a problem to do that while still honouring gnome settings | 13:11 |
| LLStarks | btw, should i undo the edit made earlier? | 13:11 |
| asac | LLStarks: which edit? | 13:11 |
| LLStarks | *i made | 13:11 |
| asac | the monospace thing? | 13:12 |
| asac | well. i think we need it | 13:12 |
| asac | but i will think about it | 13:12 |
| asac | if you want to track the pristine package bheaviour remove it for now | 13:12 |
| LLStarks | if i wanted to revert to repo fontconfig, is there anything exotic i need to do? | 13:14 |
| asac | no | 13:14 |
| asac | LLStarks: so the difference is that the hinting doesnt differntiate for fontsizes? | 13:14 |
| asac | LLStarks: is that all that regressed next to the monospace thing? | 13:14 |
| LLStarks | i honestly wouldn't know what the expected behavior is. | 13:15 |
| asac | LLStarks: please keep using the package for a while and tell me i there are bad experiences | 13:16 |
| asac | besides from the above ;) | 13:16 |
| asac | if you can live with them at all | 13:16 |
| LLStarks | gnome-terminal seems to be afflicted somewhat | 13:17 |
| LLStarks | even xchat | 13:17 |
| asac | LLStarks: they changed of course. question is if its a problem ;) | 13:17 |
| LLStarks | lemme try using default ubuntu theme | 13:17 |
| asac | almost everything should look a bit different now | 13:17 |
| LLStarks | if i choose to downgrade, will mt2 settings linger? | 13:18 |
| asac | LLStarks: dont think so | 13:20 |
| LLStarks | there 4 or 5 packages to downgrade, right? | 13:20 |
| asac | LLStarks: the repo package has "more" config ... and the mozilalteawm package has less | 13:20 |
| asac | a strict subset ;) | 13:20 |
| asac | LLStarks: not sure | 13:20 |
| asac | just fontconfig stuff | 13:20 |
| LLStarks | and the libraries? | 13:20 |
| asac | if they are called fontconfig then yes | 13:21 |
| LLStarks | my eyes feel relieved now. | 13:23 |
| asac | LLStarks: because of the colorful bug for huge zoomlevels? | 13:23 |
| LLStarks | yeah. | 13:23 |
| asac | you zoom that much? | 13:24 |
| LLStarks | but firefox 3.0 still seems afflicted. | 13:24 |
| asac | i dont recognize it | 13:24 |
| LLStarks | lemme restart it. | 13:24 |
| LLStarks | that's better | 13:24 |
| asac | fta2: i think i already have the same version installed were i bumped the changelog to. thats why i ment tomorrow ;) | 15:17 |
| fta2 | well, the bot fetched trunk so we're on par | 15:18 |
| BUGabundo | asac: ping | 15:25 |
| BUGabundo | how was lunch? | 15:25 |
| asac | BUGabundo: gone in two minutes | 15:25 |
| asac | BUGabundo: good ;) | 15:25 |
| BUGabundo | ehehe | 15:25 |
| BUGabundo | you manage to be faster then me | 15:26 |
| BUGabundo | LOL | 15:26 |
| asac | meeting o'clock | 15:26 |
| BUGabundo | ohh | 15:26 |
| BUGabundo | after if, do you think you can manage a bit of time to work on bug 329798 ? | 15:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 329798 in network-manager "NM will not connect to FON AP" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/329798 | 15:26 |
| BUGabundo | I have 2 laptops, that fail to work.... | 15:26 |
| BUGabundo | I manage only ONCE to connect to it, with this laptop | 15:26 |
| BUGabundo | but it I need to hardreset the AP (la fonera) and my laptop | 15:27 |
| BUGabundo | other then that, it will always fail | 15:27 |
| fta2 | 30 minutes just to pack the chromium tarball, my disks suck | 15:40 |
| fta2 | 8 16:11 ./debian/rules get-orig-source LOCAL_BRANCH=../upstream/chromium-browser.svn | 15:41 |
| fta2 | 9 16:40 date | 15:41 |
| BUGabundo | fta2 get a 16GiBs SSD | 15:42 |
| jagadeesh | is there any option to display number of unread emails in thunderbird? | 15:53 |
| BUGabundo | jagadeesh: on a ballon? | 15:53 |
| BUGabundo | right now NO | 15:53 |
| BUGabundo | damn it | 15:53 |
| BUGabundo | he went away | 15:53 |
| jagadeesh | BUGabundo: that should be ok | 15:55 |
| jagadeesh | when I minimize window I want to know if there is any unread email | 15:56 |
| BUGabundo | right now NO | 15:56 |
| BUGabundo | but I just saw a post on identica about evo | 15:56 |
| BUGabundo | jagadeesh: http://identi.ca/notice/2463547 | 15:57 |
| BUGabundo | remember that many apps have to be patched to use libindicate | 15:58 |
| jagadeesh | BUGabundo: thanks. it is interesting | 16:03 |
| asac | improving notifications is on the agendafor tbird | 16:15 |
| asac | problem is that tbird folks need to make 3.0 release happen soon | 16:15 |
| asac | so most likely this will have to wait for 3.1 | 16:15 |
| asac | notifications == indications | 16:15 |
| BUGabundo | fta gwibber daily bug | 16:20 |
| BUGabundo | it won't start by just isseing "$ gwibber" | 16:21 |
| BUGabundo | I have to state the full PATH | 16:21 |
| fta2 | ? | 16:21 |
| fta2 | works for me | 16:22 |
| fta2 | BUGabundo, ^^ | 16:22 |
| BUGabundo | $ gwibber | 16:23 |
| BUGabundo | bash: /usr/local/bin/gwibber: No such file or directory | 16:23 |
| BUGabundo | bugabundo@blubug:/$ whereis gwibber | 16:23 |
| BUGabundo | gwibber: /usr/bin/gwibber /usr/share/gwibber | 16:23 |
| BUGabundo | bugabundo@blubug:/$ /usr/bin/gwibber | 16:23 |
| asac | BUGabundo: exec bash | 16:25 |
| asac | see if its fixed then | 16:25 |
| fta2 | BUGabundo, it's an old one then. 0.9.1~bzr247-0ubuntu1~daily1 | 16:26 |
| asac | i mean, run: exec bash | 16:26 |
| asac | so bash updates his PATH cache | 16:26 |
| BUGabundo | done | 16:26 |
| fta2 | if you still have one in /usr/local/bin, it's no longer one of mine | 16:26 |
| BUGabundo | now it starts | 16:27 |
| fta2 | bash is evil | 16:27 |
| BUGabundo | I run --purge and install before I came here | 16:27 |
| fta2 | purge doesn't purge what you install with sudo python setup.py | 16:28 |
| BUGabundo | just to be sure | 16:29 |
| BUGabundo | since I had a bzr a while back | 16:29 |
| BUGabundo | $ whereis gwibber | 16:29 |
| BUGabundo | gwibber: /usr/bin/gwibber /usr/share/gwibber | 16:29 |
| fta2 | better | 16:30 |
| asac | BUGabundo: you got a gwibber update which remove dthe /usr/local/ thing and bash didnt notice because it caches the PATH completions | 16:30 |
| fta2 | <BUGabundo> bash: /usr/local/bin/gwibber: No such file or directory <= good, it's no longer the python2.6 bug then | 16:30 |
| BUGabundo | I just closed my terminals an opened new ones | 16:30 |
| BUGabundo | its running fine now | 16:31 |
| BUGabundo | but already saw two apport fires on it | 16:31 |
| BUGabundo | maybe I should go back to run it from cli to catch them | 16:31 |
| BUGabundo | how would I run a python based app with valgrind? | 16:31 |
| BUGabundo | it was fun to see gedit / seahorse-plugins bloat yesterday for seb128 | 16:32 |
| asac | hi stefanlsd | 16:55 |
| asac | just ask what you want to discuss about gears 64 | 16:55 |
| stefanlsd | k. thx | 16:55 |
| fta2 | grr; this is getting on my nerves: http://paste.ubuntu.com/122453/ | 16:55 |
| stefanlsd | i've noticed the wiki packages / tutorials on packaging extentions for mozilla. which is great. thx | 16:55 |
| stefanlsd | seems like this is to do the the resulting .xpi | 16:56 |
| stefanlsd | is this the preferred way of doing an extension? Would we prefer to build the xpi from source? | 16:56 |
| fta2 | asac, are the graphs mentioned by rickspencer3 public? | 17:01 |
| asac | fta2: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2009-02-24/ | 17:02 |
| asac | there are graphs | 17:02 |
| asac | if thats what you mean | 17:02 |
| stefanlsd | gonna go home quick. bbl :) | 17:09 |
| BUGabundo | asac: so you are already leaving? | 18:01 |
| asac | BUGabundo: now out. will look for a few minutes in 30 min ;) | 18:08 |
| BUGabundo | ok | 18:08 |
| BUGabundo | if you have the time, PLEASE, take a look at those FON logs | 18:08 |
| BUGabundo | thanks so much | 18:09 |
| surfaz | asac, there is any progress with pgo and firefox? | 18:18 |
| surfaz | If I can help tell me | 18:18 |
| stefanlsd | I am busy looking at packaging google gears for 64 bit. I patched the source, built against some 64bit libs (xpcom stuff) and have a resultant .xpi. Is it ok to package this xpi as an extension now? | 18:37 |
| BUGabundo | stefanlsd: can you give me a link for it? | 18:40 |
| BUGabundo | I would love to test the XPI | 18:40 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: sure, let me upload it somewhere for you. hang on | 18:40 |
| BUGabundo | thanks | 18:41 |
| BUGabundo | do you need feed back on it? | 18:41 |
| BUGabundo | can you get it on mozilla store? | 18:41 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: http://www.lsd.co.za/files/gears-linux-opt-0.5.13.0.xpi | 18:51 |
| BUGabundo | big isn't it ? | 18:53 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: a little. source code is 300mb | 18:56 |
| stefanlsd | a lot of 3rd party stuff tho | 18:56 |
| BUGabundo | xeee | 18:56 |
| stefanlsd | actual gears stuff is 18mb | 18:56 |
| BUGabundo | need to restart it now | 18:56 |
| BUGabundo | and test GR | 18:56 |
| BUGabundo | stefanlsd: humm google reader is not detecting it | 18:59 |
| BUGabundo | need to log out and login again? | 18:59 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: let me try reader. i've tried gmail offline folders, and that was ok | 18:59 |
| BUGabundo | pressing Gears Setting from the menu doesn't do anything either | 19:00 |
| BUGabundo | FYI this is FF3.1 | 19:00 |
| BUGabundo | from daily PPA | 19:00 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: aah. i think its only FF3.0 atm. need to look at 3.1 support still | 19:01 |
| === fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
| BUGabundo | GAFYD : "You will need Gears for offline access, and the installer will restart your browser." | 19:02 |
| BUGabundo | and 3.2 | 19:02 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: does addons display FF3.1 reports Gears not compatible? | 19:03 |
| BUGabundo | what addon doesn't? | 19:11 |
| BUGabundo | lol | 19:11 |
| BUGabundo | I use nightly tools, so ALL work | 19:11 |
| BUGabundo | do you want me to test it on a clean 3.2 profile ? | 19:11 |
| BUGabundo | stefanlsd: "Google Gears 0.5.13.0 could not be installed because it is not compatible with Minefield 3.2a1pre." | 19:13 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: ok. so far its just 3.0 compatible. Will do some research on 3.1 and 3.2 | 19:15 |
| BUGabundo | thanks | 19:15 |
| BUGabundo | :( | 19:15 |
| BUGabundo | ill have to keep waiting then | 19:16 |
| BUGabundo | ping me (here or on identica) when you have some news and need testing | 19:16 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: kk. want to see if it will be possible to get this extension into jaunty. Will let you know. | 19:17 |
| BUGabundo | stefanlsd: its pass FF | 19:20 |
| BUGabundo | its gona be paperwork | 19:20 |
| stefanlsd | BUGabundo: yeah. although considering getting gmail offline and reader and some other? may be worth it. will check if i can get it done soon. | 19:21 |
| BUGabundo | fta: here is a daily regression for you | 19:35 |
| BUGabundo | opening a new Window with ctrl-N | 19:36 |
| BUGabundo | Script: chrome://tabmixplus/content/tab/tab.js:782 | 19:36 |
| BUGabundo | something is messing tabmixplus addon | 19:36 |
| BUGabundo | and was working yesterday | 19:36 |
| BUGabundo | brb | 19:50 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| [reed] | gnomefreak: http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/2009/02/even_more_on_the_sunbirdlightn.html | 22:27 |
| fta | BUGabundo, well, for regressions with the daily, it's better to report that directly to mozilla (aka [reed]) if you think it's an upstream bug (in opposition to a packaging bug). with the dailies, you immediately have two close rev-ids. | 22:34 |
| [reed] | I am Upstream Guy. :) | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | need to start a new profile and test back | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | but since this is with an addon | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | .... grr I fall in the midlle | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | the addon did not get upgraded | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | and the only thing that changed was FF | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | hi [reed] | 22:36 |
| [reed] | hi | 22:36 |
| fta | as the packaging didn't change in weeks, it's most likely an upstream change, and i think moz would love to know it's breaking something | 22:36 |
| [reed] | what are you running into? | 22:37 |
| fta | if moz doesn't care, it brings some water to my fountain :P | 22:37 |
| BUGabundo | [reed]: opening a new window seems to be giving an error with tabmixplus | 22:37 |
| BUGabundo | it makes FF take too long to fork | 22:38 |
| [reed] | what version of Firefox? | 22:38 |
| BUGabundo | and then a popup asks to kill or wait | 22:38 |
| BUGabundo | Script: chrome://osb/content/osb-main.js:5 | 22:38 |
| BUGabundo | ff 3.1 from daily ppa | 22:38 |
| [reed] | which maps to what rev? | 22:38 |
| BUGabundo | 3.1~b3~hg20090222r23369+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 | 22:38 |
| [reed] | hmm | 22:38 |
| BUGabundo | Script: chrome://tabmixplus/content/tab/tab.js:782 | 22:39 |
| BUGabundo | Script: chrome://tabmixplus/content/tab/tab.js:821 | 22:39 |
| fta | grab a previous daily from lp, test if it's still there, then isolate the rev ids | 22:39 |
| BUGabundo | great now I'm on an endless popup state | 22:39 |
| fta | that's the purpose of dailies, it's not just about running the newest ;) | 22:40 |
| [reed] | :) | 22:40 |
| BUGabundo | I know | 22:40 |
| BUGabundo | and I don't! | 22:40 |
| BUGabundo | for that I would be on 3.2 | 22:40 |
| BUGabundo | but it messes a few of my NEEDED addons | 22:40 |
| BUGabundo | ok | 22:40 |
| BUGabundo | time to make a new profile and install tabmixplus to test it | 22:41 |
| * BUGabundo glad I got rid of the popup | 22:41 | |
| BUGabundo | [reed]: new (clean) profile doesn't have it | 22:43 |
| BUGabundo | installing TB P now | 22:43 |
| BUGabundo | http://tmp.garyr.net/tab_mix_plus-dev-build.xpi | 22:43 |
| BUGabundo | no reports on their forum http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9864&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100 | 22:44 |
| BUGabundo | new profile with tabmix plus aint showing it either | 22:45 |
| BUGabundo | :( | 22:45 |
| BUGabundo | can't reproduce it now | 22:47 |
| BUGabundo | bbl | 22:47 |
| hyper_ch | fta: online? | 22:50 |
| fta | hyper_ch, yes | 22:51 |
| hyper_ch | fta: did you submit your ppa repo on the repo generator? | 22:51 |
| fta | repo generator? what is that? | 22:52 |
| fta | obviously, i didn't :P | 22:52 |
| hyper_ch | fta: http://repogen.simplylinux.ch | 22:52 |
| hyper_ch | fta: I just got a submission for your repo and for some reason for each entry on the submission form there was your name added.... which is quite odd as I have never received such a "wrong" submission before :) | 22:52 |
| fta | it's not me, that's for sure. | 22:53 |
| hyper_ch | fta: but if it was not you who submitted it, I wonder what description shall I use for it? The one you have in the PPA description? The submitted info for the description was "Firefox, XUL and other latest buildsFabien Tassi" | 22:53 |
| fta | this is no longer "latest builds", and my name is incomplete | 22:54 |
| hyper_ch | fta: well, what name shall I give to the repo and what description? | 22:55 |
| fta | difficult to say, it's my personal PPA and i have over 100 packages | 22:55 |
| hyper_ch | fta: you can also chose to not have it included on my repo generator :) | 22:56 |
| fta | this is the latest for mozilla: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa | 22:56 |
| fta | yep, don't include mine, enough people are using it, it's spreading by itself already. and i'm slowly moving to dedicated PPAs | 22:57 |
| hyper_ch | fta: ok :) thx for pointint out the mozilla one, I'll add that one | 22:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
