[10:15] <asac> tbird 3 dailies should be fixed in branch
[10:15] <asac> fta: ^^
[10:15] <asac> please reenable
[10:15] <asac> and maybe give it an extra run today
[10:39] <asac> fta: lease please pleaes test my fontconfig fixes
[10:40] <asac> i want to be sure about what kind of regressions folks that actually see font-issues (i am too blind for that) see before doing it
[10:40] <asac> fta: they are are ~mozillateam PPA
[10:49] <asac> fta: just assume that your obsolete files get removed by package  ... toherwise i plan to just upload it
[11:10] <fta> asac, the problem is that i have dropped one or two files in fontconfig, so i don't remember how to reproduce
[11:11] <asac> fta: yeah. just --reinstall fontconfig-config
[11:11] <asac> fta: then check the conffile list
[11:11] <asac> fta: oh. also run dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config
[11:11] <asac> and select the defaults
[11:12] <fta> one guy said the liberation fonts are ugly now
[11:12] <asac> liberation fonts?
[11:12] <asac> with my package?
[11:13] <fta> yes
[11:13] <fta> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-mozillateam/2009-February/000626.html
[11:42] <asac> fta: yeah. i think thats expected. I probably dropped some ttf tweakage
[11:42] <asac> well ... not expected, but now that someone complained i think i know what to look at
[11:47] <fta> asac, so for tb3, you basically did what sm2 is doing, i.e, drop the mega xpt and ship all the small ones individually. right?
[11:47] <fta> unlike xul and ff
[11:52] <fta> i still don't understand why my stuff was broken, <sigh> ..
[11:56] <LLStarks> rawr.
[11:57] <LLStarks> why is british spelling default for firefox spellcheck?
[12:01] <LLStarks> brb. ext4 is acting up again.
[12:25] <asac> fta: basically yes.
[12:25] <asac> and thats even supported by packager.mk
[12:26] <asac> so we just need to not make the test fatal
[12:26] <asac> and all is good
[12:26] <asac> currently have the hack in the removed-files
[12:26] <asac> we should make that sensible to STATIC or !STATIC too there
[12:26] <asac> instead of ifndef XP_UNIX ;)
[12:28] <LLStarks> asac, before i fire off 3 different bugs to the firefox packagers... i need your insight.
[12:28] <gnomefreak> why do i get the feeling that i would need to run autoconf2.13 when building for a different version of ubuntu?
[12:28] <LLStarks> why is en-gb the default?
[12:28] <gnomefreak> it is?
[12:29] <asac> LLStarks: cant remember right now
[12:29] <LLStarks> <___<
[12:29] <gnomefreak> i thought it followed the rules of the system default locale
[12:29] <asac> i think its rather random
[12:29] <asac> we ship both dics in the same package and ffox picks first seen
[12:30] <asac> gnomefreak: tbird 3 is fixed ;) ... so new tbird might be there tomorrow
[12:30] <gnomefreak> asac: thanks
[12:33] <thunderstruck> you have got to be kidding me
[12:34] <gnomefreak> crashes now connection. my day is starting to suck badly
[12:35] <asac> kidding?
[12:35] <asac> why ;)?
[12:37] <gnomefreak> first my timer crashed now my connection is bad i have been here for all of 5 minutes and this happens what else can go wrong
[12:37] <asac> fta: do you know why we dont do a static build? do we explicitly opt-out somehow or is that just not the default for tbird?
[12:37] <asac> i guess its the later ... but since folks in the bug sounded a bit like that they think static is right, that souds a bit wierd at the same time
[12:39] <LLStarks> ack. how do i reset fontconfig? the patch is breaking subpixel as much as it is fixing it.
[12:40] <asac> LLStarks: no change?
[12:40] <asac> LLStarks: so ... dpkg --query fontconfig-config | grep obsolete
[12:40] <asac> what files do you get there?
[12:40] <LLStarks> i'm getting the red tinge around my fonts
[12:41] <LLStarks> query is not a valid argument. <_<
[12:41] <asac> LLStarks: try --status ;)
[12:42] <LLStarks> http://pastebin.com/m57cc0dbc
[12:42] <LLStarks> thx
[12:42] <asac> LLStarks: ok. and ls /etc/fonts/conf.d/ ?
[12:43] <LLStarks> http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/7804/thehorrorofsubpixel.png
[12:43] <LLStarks> chew on that for a second
[12:43] <thunderstruck> oh this is going to piss me off. i may not be here long
[12:43] <LLStarks> look at the pastebin output box
[12:43] <LLStarks> (top box)
[12:43] <asac> LLStarks: ok. thats monospace font
[12:43] <asac> are all but the monospace fonts ok?
[12:43] <asac> LLStarks: does it help if you zoom in?
[12:44] <asac> e.g. ctrl-+
[12:44] <asac> (for two times)
[12:44] <LLStarks> WORSE
[12:44] <LLStarks> wait
[12:44] <LLStarks> nvm i was looking at the screenshot
[12:44] <asac> LLStarks: dont zoom the pic ;)
[12:44] <asac> lol
[12:44] <LLStarks> still worse for the actual window
[12:45] <LLStarks> actually, a bit better
[12:45] <LLStarks> want a screenie?
[12:46] <LLStarks> http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/3912/zoom2x.png
[12:46] <LLStarks> ls output: http://pastebin.com/m1af92e37
[12:46] <asac> LLStarks: what settings are you using in the fonts preferences?
[12:47] <asac> just the default "subpixel (best for LCD"
[12:47] <asac> or did you tweak something in the "Details..:"
[12:48] <LLStarks> http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/875/screenshotfonts.png
[12:48]  * gnomefreak away while update install than maybe email and i will work on seamonkey bullshit tomorrow
[12:48] <LLStarks> http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/9696/screenshotfontrendering.png
[12:48] <asac> LLStarks: can you please paste the content of /etc/fonts/conf.avail/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf
[12:48] <asac> LLStarks: also did you paste the ls /etc/fonts/fonts.d yet?
[12:49] <LLStarks> yeah i did
[12:49] <LLStarks> ls output: http://pastebin.com/m1af92e37
[12:50] <asac> LLStarks: and the .conf?
[12:50] <LLStarks> one sec
[12:51] <LLStarks> http://pastebin.com/m1d2160a8
[12:51] <LLStarks> ny times rendering: http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/1774/screenshotadvertisingtr.png
[12:51] <LLStarks> notice the orange and blue tinge?
[12:52] <asac> LLStarks: yeah.
[12:52] <asac> (not the orange)
[12:52] <asac> the yeah was about something else
[12:53] <asac> please do: sudo ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf
[12:53] <asac> and see if things change
[12:53] <LLStarks> btw, was the times page monospaced?
[12:54] <LLStarks> no difference. do i need to do anything?
[12:54] <asac> yes
[12:54] <asac> restart stuff
[12:54] <LLStarks> system or applications?
[12:55] <asac> usually changing zoom also makes the new font stuff apply
[12:55] <asac> LLStarks: are you using ffox 3.0`
[12:55] <asac> ?
[12:55] <LLStarks> yah
[12:55] <LLStarks> damn it cnn. you guys are obsessed with tropicana too?
[12:55] <asac> LLStarks: well. then all this isnt for you
[12:55] <asac> its for those apps that really honour fontconfig/gnome
[12:56] <asac> LLStarks: better try ffox 3.1 or 3.2
[12:56] <asac> from ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily
[12:56] <asac> LLStarks: and also the gnome experience is what bothers me most. are there regressions over the previous package on the other desktop apps ;)
[12:56] <LLStarks> one sec..
[12:56] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive
[12:57] <LLStarks> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Shiretoko/3.1b3pre
[12:57] <LLStarks> that's daily, right?
[12:57] <asac> would think so
[12:57] <asac> if thats installed as a pacakge at least
[12:58] <asac> if you downloaded fom mozilla it should be ok to test with it ... but i am not 100% sure
[12:58] <LLStarks> at any rate, 3.1 shares the subpixel woes.
[12:58] <LLStarks> the antialiasing is a lot better though.
[12:59] <asac> LLStarks: i think one issue is with small fonts
[12:59] <asac> e.g. bitstream vera does not support subpixel for small sizes (< 9?)
[12:59] <asac> so there is a rule that disables it for small fonts
[12:59] <LLStarks> lemme give you pic of the mozilla homepage with zoom
[13:00] <LLStarks> http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7039/ughhhhhh.png
[13:00] <LLStarks> look at the text near the cursor
[13:01] <asac> yeah. i see that there is some color
[13:02] <asac> LLStarks: hmm ... maybe subpixel order setting is a rpboelm?
[13:02] <LLStarks> orange L
[13:02] <asac> check fonts details
[13:03] <LLStarks> http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/9696/screenshotfontrendering.png
[13:05] <LLStarks> full hinting seems to 'fix' the problem
[13:05] <asac> LLStarks: does this change on higher/lower zoom level
[13:05] <asac> seems i see a bit of red too at a certain zoom level
[13:05] <gnomefreak> quick bash script question: how would i launch a tab in terminal? i have it to launch gnometerminal but not sure how to make it open a tab
[13:06] <asac> but all other zoom levels dont have this problem
[13:06] <LLStarks> does what change?
[13:06] <asac> LLStarks: the colorful subpixel mess up ;)
[13:06] <LLStarks> with full hinting?
[13:07] <asac> LLStarks: no. zoom out or in a bit more
[13:07] <asac> do you see the same effect on all zoom levels?
[13:07] <LLStarks> with the default slight hinting?
[13:07] <asac> yeah
[13:07] <asac> maybe tune the hinting too
[13:08] <LLStarks> if i zoom in far enough with slight hinting, the colors dissipate slightly.
[13:09] <LLStarks> it still remains though, but less noticeable
[13:09] <LLStarks> but this is zoom x5
[13:09] <LLStarks> at least
[13:09] <asac> so seems we need full hinting for large font sizes
[13:09] <asac> medium for medium and slight for small ones
[13:11] <asac> LLStarks: btw, after changing settings, just zoom will really apply the new settings - at least for me ;)
[13:11] <LLStarks> sounds like a headache.
[13:11] <LLStarks> (with regard to hinting)
[13:11] <asac> its a bit of a problem to do that while still honouring gnome settings
[13:11] <LLStarks> btw, should i undo the edit made earlier?
[13:11] <asac> LLStarks: which edit?
[13:11] <LLStarks> *i made
[13:12] <asac> the monospace thing?
[13:12] <asac> well. i think we need it
[13:12] <asac> but i will think about it
[13:12] <asac> if you want to track the pristine package bheaviour remove it for now
[13:14] <LLStarks> if i wanted to revert to repo fontconfig, is there anything exotic i need to do?
[13:14] <asac> no
[13:14] <asac> LLStarks: so the difference is that the hinting doesnt differntiate for fontsizes?
[13:14] <asac> LLStarks: is that all that regressed next to the monospace thing?
[13:15] <LLStarks> i honestly wouldn't know what the expected behavior is.
[13:16] <asac> LLStarks: please keep using the package for a while and tell me i there are bad experiences
[13:16] <asac> besides from the above ;)
[13:16] <asac> if you can live with them at all
[13:17] <LLStarks> gnome-terminal seems to be afflicted somewhat
[13:17] <LLStarks> even xchat
[13:17] <asac> LLStarks: they changed of course. question is if its a problem ;)
[13:17] <LLStarks> lemme try using default ubuntu theme
[13:17] <asac> almost everything should look a bit different now
[13:18] <LLStarks> if i choose to downgrade, will mt2 settings linger?
[13:20] <asac> LLStarks: dont think so
[13:20] <LLStarks> there 4 or 5 packages to downgrade, right?
[13:20] <asac> LLStarks: the repo package has "more" config ... and the mozilalteawm package has less
[13:20] <asac> a strict subset ;)
[13:20] <asac> LLStarks: not sure
[13:20] <asac> just fontconfig stuff
[13:20] <LLStarks> and the libraries?
[13:21] <asac> if they are called fontconfig then yes
[13:23] <LLStarks> my eyes feel relieved now.
[13:23] <asac> LLStarks: because of the colorful bug for huge zoomlevels?
[13:23] <LLStarks> yeah.
[13:24] <asac> you zoom that much?
[13:24] <LLStarks> but firefox 3.0 still seems afflicted.
[13:24] <asac> i dont recognize it
[13:24] <LLStarks> lemme restart it.
[13:24] <LLStarks> that's better
[15:17] <asac> fta2: i think i already have the same version installed were i bumped the changelog to. thats why i ment tomorrow ;)
[15:18] <fta2> well, the bot fetched trunk so we're on par
[15:25] <BUGabundo> asac: ping
[15:25] <BUGabundo> how was lunch?
[15:25] <asac> BUGabundo: gone in two minutes
[15:25] <asac> BUGabundo: good ;)
[15:25] <BUGabundo> ehehe
[15:26] <BUGabundo> you manage to be faster then me
[15:26] <BUGabundo> LOL
[15:26] <asac> meeting o'clock
[15:26] <BUGabundo> ohh
[15:26] <BUGabundo> after if, do you think you can manage a bit of time to work on bug 329798 ?
[15:26] <BUGabundo> I have 2 laptops, that fail to work....
[15:26] <BUGabundo> I manage only ONCE to connect to it, with this laptop
[15:27] <BUGabundo> but it I need to hardreset the AP (la fonera) and my laptop
[15:27] <BUGabundo> other then that, it will always fail
[15:40] <fta2> 30 minutes just to pack the chromium tarball, my disks suck
[15:41] <fta2>      8  16:11   ./debian/rules get-orig-source LOCAL_BRANCH=../upstream/chromium-browser.svn
[15:41] <fta2>      9  16:40   date
[15:42] <BUGabundo> fta2 get a 16GiBs SSD
[15:53] <jagadeesh> is there any option to display number of unread emails in thunderbird?
[15:53] <BUGabundo> jagadeesh: on a ballon?
[15:53] <BUGabundo> right now NO
[15:53] <BUGabundo> damn it
[15:53] <BUGabundo> he went away
[15:55] <jagadeesh> BUGabundo: that should be ok
[15:56] <jagadeesh> when I minimize window I want to know if there is any unread email
[15:56] <BUGabundo> right now NO
[15:56] <BUGabundo> but I just saw a post on identica about evo
[15:57] <BUGabundo> jagadeesh: http://identi.ca/notice/2463547
[15:58] <BUGabundo> remember that many apps have to be patched to use libindicate
[16:03] <jagadeesh> BUGabundo: thanks. it is interesting
[16:15] <asac> improving notifications is on the agendafor tbird
[16:15] <asac> problem is that tbird folks need to make 3.0 release happen soon
[16:15] <asac> so most likely this will have to wait for 3.1
[16:15] <asac> notifications == indications
[16:20] <BUGabundo> fta gwibber daily bug
[16:21] <BUGabundo> it won't start by just isseing "$ gwibber"
[16:21] <BUGabundo> I have to state the full PATH
[16:21] <fta2> ?
[16:22] <fta2> works for me
[16:22] <fta2> BUGabundo, ^^
[16:23] <BUGabundo> $ gwibber
[16:23] <BUGabundo> bash: /usr/local/bin/gwibber: No such file or directory
[16:23] <BUGabundo> bugabundo@blubug:/$ whereis gwibber
[16:23] <BUGabundo> gwibber: /usr/bin/gwibber /usr/share/gwibber
[16:23] <BUGabundo> bugabundo@blubug:/$ /usr/bin/gwibber
[16:25] <asac> BUGabundo: exec bash
[16:25] <asac> see if its fixed then
[16:26] <fta2> BUGabundo, it's an old one then. 0.9.1~bzr247-0ubuntu1~daily1
[16:26] <asac> i mean, run: exec bash
[16:26] <asac> so bash updates his PATH cache
[16:26] <BUGabundo> done
[16:26] <fta2> if you still have one in /usr/local/bin, it's no longer one of mine
[16:27] <BUGabundo> now it starts
[16:27] <fta2> bash is evil
[16:27] <BUGabundo> I run --purge and install before I came here
[16:28] <fta2> purge doesn't purge what you install with sudo python setup.py
[16:29] <BUGabundo> just to be sure
[16:29] <BUGabundo> since I had a bzr a while back
[16:29] <BUGabundo> $ whereis gwibber
[16:29] <BUGabundo> gwibber: /usr/bin/gwibber /usr/share/gwibber
[16:30] <fta2> better
[16:30] <asac> BUGabundo: you got a gwibber update which remove dthe /usr/local/ thing and bash didnt notice because it caches the PATH completions
 bash: /usr/local/bin/gwibber: No such file or directory <= good, it's no longer the python2.6 bug then
[16:30] <BUGabundo> I just closed my terminals an opened new ones
[16:31] <BUGabundo> its running fine now
[16:31] <BUGabundo> but already saw two apport fires on it
[16:31] <BUGabundo> maybe I should go back to run it from cli to catch them
[16:31] <BUGabundo> how would I run a python based app with valgrind?
[16:32] <BUGabundo> it was fun to see gedit / seahorse-plugins bloat yesterday for seb128
[16:55] <asac> hi stefanlsd
[16:55] <asac> just ask what you want to discuss about gears 64
[16:55] <stefanlsd> k. thx
[16:55] <fta2> grr; this is getting on my nerves: http://paste.ubuntu.com/122453/
[16:55] <stefanlsd> i've noticed the wiki packages / tutorials on packaging extentions for mozilla. which is great. thx
[16:56] <stefanlsd> seems like this is to do the the resulting .xpi
[16:56] <stefanlsd> is this the preferred way of doing an extension?  Would we prefer to build the xpi from source?
[17:01] <fta2> asac, are the graphs mentioned by rickspencer3 public?
[17:02] <asac> fta2: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2009-02-24/
[17:02] <asac> there are graphs
[17:02] <asac> if thats what you mean
[17:09] <stefanlsd> gonna go home quick. bbl :)
[18:01] <BUGabundo> asac: so you are already leaving?
[18:08] <asac> BUGabundo: now out. will look for a few minutes in 30 min ;)
[18:08] <BUGabundo> ok
[18:08] <BUGabundo> if you have the time, PLEASE, take a look at those FON logs
[18:09] <BUGabundo> thanks so much
[18:18] <surfaz> asac, there is any progress with pgo and firefox?
[18:18] <surfaz> If I can help tell me
[18:37] <stefanlsd> I am busy looking at packaging google gears for 64 bit. I patched the source, built against some 64bit libs (xpcom stuff) and have a resultant .xpi.  Is it ok to package this xpi as an extension now?
[18:40] <BUGabundo> stefanlsd: can you give me a link for it?
[18:40] <BUGabundo> I would love to test the XPI
[18:40] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: sure, let me upload it somewhere for you. hang on
[18:41] <BUGabundo> thanks
[18:41] <BUGabundo> do you need feed back on it?
[18:41] <BUGabundo> can you get it on mozilla store?
[18:51] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: http://www.lsd.co.za/files/gears-linux-opt-0.5.13.0.xpi
[18:53] <BUGabundo> big isn't it ?
[18:56] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: a little. source code is 300mb
[18:56] <stefanlsd> a lot of 3rd party stuff tho
[18:56] <BUGabundo> xeee
[18:56] <stefanlsd> actual gears stuff is 18mb
[18:56] <BUGabundo> need to restart it now
[18:56] <BUGabundo> and test GR
[18:59] <BUGabundo> stefanlsd: humm google reader is not detecting it
[18:59] <BUGabundo> need to log out and login again?
[18:59] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: let me try reader. i've tried gmail offline folders, and that was ok
[19:00] <BUGabundo> pressing Gears Setting from the menu doesn't do anything either
[19:00] <BUGabundo> FYI this is FF3.1
[19:00] <BUGabundo> from daily PPA
[19:01] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: aah. i think its only FF3.0 atm. need to look at 3.1 support still
[19:02] <BUGabundo> GAFYD : "You will need Gears for offline access, and the installer will restart your browser."
[19:02] <BUGabundo> and 3.2
[19:03] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: does addons display FF3.1 reports Gears not compatible?
[19:11] <BUGabundo> what addon doesn't?
[19:11] <BUGabundo> lol
[19:11] <BUGabundo> I use nightly tools, so ALL work
[19:11] <BUGabundo> do you want me to test it on a clean 3.2 profile ?
[19:13] <BUGabundo> stefanlsd: "Google Gears 0.5.13.0 could not be installed because it is not compatible with Minefield 3.2a1pre."
[19:15] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: ok. so far its just 3.0 compatible. Will do some research on 3.1 and 3.2
[19:15] <BUGabundo> thanks
[19:15] <BUGabundo> :(
[19:16] <BUGabundo> ill have to keep waiting then
[19:16] <BUGabundo> ping me (here or on identica) when you have some news and need testing
[19:17] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: kk. want to see if it will be possible to get this extension into jaunty. Will let you know.
[19:20] <BUGabundo> stefanlsd: its pass FF
[19:20] <BUGabundo> its gona be paperwork
[19:21] <stefanlsd> BUGabundo: yeah. although considering getting gmail offline and reader and some other? may be worth it. will check if i can get it done soon.
[19:35] <BUGabundo> fta: here is a daily regression for you
[19:36] <BUGabundo> opening a new Window with ctrl-N
[19:36] <BUGabundo> Script: chrome://tabmixplus/content/tab/tab.js:782
[19:36] <BUGabundo> something is messing tabmixplus addon
[19:36] <BUGabundo> and was working yesterday
[19:50] <BUGabundo> brb
[22:27] <[reed]> gnomefreak: http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/2009/02/even_more_on_the_sunbirdlightn.html
[22:34] <fta> BUGabundo, well, for regressions with the daily, it's better to report that directly to mozilla (aka [reed]) if you think it's an upstream bug (in opposition to a packaging bug). with the dailies, you immediately have two close rev-ids.
[22:35] <[reed]> I am Upstream Guy. :)
[22:35] <BUGabundo> need to start a new profile and test back
[22:35] <BUGabundo> but since this is with an addon
[22:35] <BUGabundo> .... grr I fall in the midlle
[22:35] <BUGabundo> the addon did not get upgraded
[22:35] <BUGabundo> and the only thing that changed was FF
[22:36] <BUGabundo> hi [reed]
[22:36] <[reed]> hi
[22:36] <fta> as the packaging didn't change in weeks, it's most likely an upstream change, and i think moz would love to know it's breaking something
[22:37] <[reed]> what are you running into?
[22:37] <fta> if moz doesn't care, it brings some water to my fountain :P
[22:37] <BUGabundo> [reed]: opening a new window seems to be giving an error with tabmixplus
[22:38] <BUGabundo> it makes FF take too long to fork
[22:38] <[reed]> what version of Firefox?
[22:38] <BUGabundo> and then a popup asks to kill or wait
[22:38] <BUGabundo> Script: chrome://osb/content/osb-main.js:5
[22:38] <BUGabundo> ff 3.1 from daily ppa
[22:38] <[reed]> which maps to what rev?
[22:38] <BUGabundo> 3.1~b3~hg20090222r23369+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1
[22:38] <[reed]> hmm
[22:39] <BUGabundo> Script: chrome://tabmixplus/content/tab/tab.js:782
[22:39] <BUGabundo> Script: chrome://tabmixplus/content/tab/tab.js:821
[22:39] <fta> grab a previous daily from lp, test if it's still there, then isolate the rev ids
[22:39] <BUGabundo> great now I'm on an endless popup state
[22:40] <fta> that's the purpose of dailies, it's not just about running the newest ;)
[22:40] <[reed]> :)
[22:40] <BUGabundo> I know
[22:40] <BUGabundo> and I don't!
[22:40] <BUGabundo> for that I would be on 3.2
[22:40] <BUGabundo> but it messes a few of my NEEDED addons
[22:40] <BUGabundo> ok
[22:41] <BUGabundo> time to make a new profile and install tabmixplus to test it
[22:41]  * BUGabundo glad I got rid of the popup
[22:43] <BUGabundo> [reed]: new (clean) profile doesn't have it
[22:43] <BUGabundo> installing TB P now
[22:43] <BUGabundo> http://tmp.garyr.net/tab_mix_plus-dev-build.xpi
[22:44] <BUGabundo> no reports on their forum http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9864&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100
[22:45] <BUGabundo> new profile with tabmix plus aint showing it either
[22:45] <BUGabundo> :(
[22:47] <BUGabundo> can't reproduce it now
[22:47] <BUGabundo> bbl
[22:50] <hyper_ch> fta: online?
[22:51] <fta> hyper_ch, yes
[22:51] <hyper_ch> fta: did you submit your ppa repo on the repo generator?
[22:52] <fta> repo generator? what is that?
[22:52] <fta> obviously, i didn't :P
[22:52] <hyper_ch> fta: http://repogen.simplylinux.ch
[22:52] <hyper_ch> fta: I just got a submission for your repo and for some reason for each entry on the submission form there was your name added.... which is quite odd as I have never received such a "wrong" submission before :)
[22:53] <fta> it's not me, that's for sure.
[22:53] <hyper_ch> fta: but if it was not you who submitted it, I wonder what description shall I use for it? The one you have in the PPA description? The submitted info for the description was "Firefox, XUL and other latest buildsFabien Tassi"
[22:54] <fta> this is no longer "latest builds", and my name is incomplete
[22:55] <hyper_ch> fta: well, what name shall I give to the repo and what description?
[22:55] <fta> difficult to say, it's my personal PPA and i have over 100 packages
[22:56] <hyper_ch> fta: you can also chose to not have it included on my repo generator :)
[22:56] <fta> this is the latest for mozilla: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[22:57] <fta> yep, don't include mine, enough people are using it, it's spreading by itself already. and i'm slowly moving to dedicated PPAs
[22:57] <hyper_ch> fta: ok :) thx for pointint out the mozilla one, I'll add that one