=== FlareFlare is now known as Flare183 === Sancas_ is now known as sancas [00:37] I'm running in a 256M environment, would xubuntu take less memory then ubuntu (which seems to tap at the sight of my ram) [00:44] avuton: yes [00:45] If you use the Xubuntu packages [00:45] charlie-tca: then it will take significantly less ram? [00:45] If you chose to install open-office.org and other resource grabbers, it won [00:45] s/won/won't [00:46] OK, I'll give it a shot then [00:46] I don't know how significant, but it is less. [01:16] <[AfZ]TomServo1> so how long do i have to lurk before i can ask questions here [01:17] you can ask them immediatly, and if someone knows the answer, and they are awake they may answer [01:17] <[AfZ]TomServo1> wow [01:17] <[AfZ]TomServo1> awesome ;) [01:19] <[AfZ]TomServo1> i need to figure out how to install my proprietary graphics driver, or at least how to roll back to the one i know works in case [01:20] !nvidia [01:20] For Ati/NVidia/Matrox video cards, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto [01:20] <[AfZ]TomServo1> and i have an intel 82845G onboard vid chip [01:23] <[AfZ]TomServo1> thanks for the link, though [02:04] For some reason during Xubuntu installation the installer hangs and crashes when starting the Partition editor, anyone experience this?? [02:05] 8.10 / 8.04 both CD's and alternate disk installation. [02:06] Do the cd's pass integrity checks [02:06] ? [02:06] Yes [02:07] Very strange, but I think there is a bug on it. If not, please file one, but make to give what your hardware is. [02:07] It is an old computer, I assume it is an issue with my harddrive [02:07] I had it happen with cd-rw's before, but not with cd-r's [02:08] Could be a bad hard drive, too. [02:08] When I start xubuntu in live CD mode, I can start the partition editor though. [02:08] It just fails on the install. [02:08] Yeah, it formats the disk during the install, after collecting the information [02:09] I assumed it would allow you to select the partition to format. [02:09] It just crashes before Checking Disk. [02:09] Oh, yeah. It is also determined to have 80 pin IDE cables [02:09] Is there a way to work around that? [02:09] If you have 40 wire cables, it will crash [02:09] That could be a possibility. [02:10] New drive cables. ATA-133, I think they sometimes call them. the 80-wire cables [02:10] Should be compatible with my current hardware [02:11] The end on the motherboard is normally blue. They are compatible with all the hardware except extremely old systems. Like the mid-90's or earlier won't work with them [02:12] I have only come across one P2 motherboard that would not accept them [02:12] nice, could be a cheap fix [02:13] yes, if that is it. It makes it look like the hard drive is dead. [02:13] Rather not spend a lot of money on a 10 year old computer [02:13] You could try 7.10 and see if it works. It doesn't require the new cables. [02:13] I'm on it [02:14] 8.04 and 8.10 both insisted on them, and they have to be connected correctly. The long end on the motherboard. [02:14] Even 80-wire cables fail, if they are not connected correct. [02:15] I'll try 7.10 first. [02:15] It will rule out the hard drive, at least. [02:15] Are the updates from 8.10 and 7.10 that noticable? [02:16] Er 7.10 and 8.10 [02:16] If it is I might just try a different OS. [02:16] yes. I think so. 8.10 has better wireless networking, easier configurations. [02:17] The cable thing is the linux kernel. All distrobutions ran into it. [02:17] Doh [02:17] I think it was found by redhat originally, but I am not sure. === Sancas_ is now known as sancas [02:18] Ahh [02:18] Well anything is better than XP S1 [02:18] SP1 [02:18] Well, yeah. [02:19] If 7.10 worked, you would know to get the new cables, right? [02:19] Yeah [02:19] It would rule out the HD [02:19] I'd just slap new cables on and allow it to update [02:20] If not, a cheap HD might be in order [02:20] I might have one laying aroundd [02:20] yeah, that too. [02:27] <[AfZ]TomServo1> what cmd do i use to find what video driver is currently being used by my vid card [02:27] <[AfZ]TomServo1> i tried the online docs already [02:27] lspci -vv [02:31] Thanks for the help charlie, have a good evening. [02:34] <[AfZ]TomServo1> well, maybe i should ask if i'm right before i try to change my video driver [02:35] <[AfZ]TomServo1> will the proprietary drivers run the video more efficiently than the prepackaged ones [02:36] <[AfZ]TomServo1> i mean, in general [02:37] it's Intel? [02:37] <[AfZ]TomServo1> yeah [02:38] To the best of my knowledge, they are equal for Intel video [02:38] <[AfZ]TomServo1> ok [02:39] Sorry. I don't think that was what you wanted. [02:40] <[AfZ]TomServo1> well not really, but i don't want to try something that could destroy my installation if i don't have to [02:41] Unless it is some of the latest stuff, it won't make much difference [02:42] <[AfZ]TomServo1> it isn't, heh [02:43] <[AfZ]TomServo1> but even so, i don't think my graphics should be running as slow as they are [02:43] 8.04 or 8.10? [02:43] <[AfZ]TomServo1> 8.1 [02:43] <[AfZ]TomServo1> xubuntu [02:44] That seems to be one of the drawbacks to 8.10. I have heard that a lot. [02:44] We're hoping Jaunty fixes whatever it is. [02:45] <[AfZ]TomServo1> i hope so too [02:47] <[AfZ]TomServo1> well thanks for your help [02:49] good luck === wormsxulla_ is now known as wormsxulla [04:47] guys i need some help .. in xubuntu how do i change screen resolution? its not under settings [04:50] Settings->Settings Manager->Display [04:51] Mood okay what if i have an external monitor? [04:51] how can i see both under settings? [04:51] define "external monitor" [04:51] i have a laptop connected on an external monitor [04:52] so you have two monitors? [04:52] its on a 19 inch screen [04:52] no im only using the 19 inch screen not the laptop's monitor [04:53] and changing the Desktop resolution under Settings Manager doesn't do it? [04:53] no it only gives me 800x600 [04:53] what's your max resolution of your 19 inch? [04:53] my video card is recognised [04:54] 1600x1200 i think [04:54] not sure [04:54] i know u can do it through the terminal somehow [04:54] it used to work under pclinuxos and mint [04:55] hmm.... [04:55] i only use one monitor myself [04:55] but looks like some people have different levels of luck w/ different solutions: [04:55] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=221174 [04:56] seems dependent on video card [04:56] well its a laptop .. but the laptop's screen is broken so i have a 19 inch monitor connected [04:57] somehow it only sees the laptop's resolution [04:57] laptop's screen resolution [04:57] yeah it seems from the online chatter that x/k/ubuntu have issues w/ dual monitors... goto that link i sent ya and start there [06:22] Anyone around? [06:23] yea but im not an expert. [06:31] roll do you need help with something? === wormsxulla_ is now known as wormsxulla [06:43] Ah sorry, I was wondering why Xubuntu would fail installation when the partitioning part came around; yet when I run Wubi it installs fine. [06:44] And I was wondering if there is any disadvantage to running a dual boot(Wubi) compared to regular installation. [06:44] i cant help you with that. im sure someone here or in #ubuntu could help you with that. [06:45] You have no experience with Wubi? [06:45] i dont even know what it is. lol [06:45] i have dual boot with XP/Xubuntu using GRUB and it works fine. [06:46] Ah, well i assume the only disadvantage to dual-booting is a loss of HD space [06:46] Of which I have no concern since I have externals. [06:46] well yea of course [06:46] yea same here i dont keep a lot of things that i need on the computers drive. [06:46] i need a new external my 120gb is full [06:48] Yeah, they are super cheap now [06:48] Only problem is that the 250s are about 10 bucks cheaper than the 1TB's [06:48] i need a job so i can finish buying the rest of the parts for my new pc. [06:49] You get laid off or you schooling? [06:49] i still need: ram, cpu fan, motherboard, and a video card [06:49] i got fired and im in school now [06:49] i was making good money but i hated the job [06:49] Service Industry is booming now, I'd become a bartender. [06:50] I make around 56g a year and have a LOT of free time. [06:50] Thanks for the help. [06:56] quiet here tonight [06:56] a little too quite... [06:57] zored brad is having trouble with his desktop [06:58] when he enabled xfce to manage his desktop his menu and icons went crazy. [06:59] something is wrong with XFCE can i like reset it or something?? [07:00] zoredache you there? [07:03] my icons keep vanishing with any input. if i right click anyware on the desktop gone. if i try and start it gone. i already had ¨places¨ disapear i dont know how to bring it back? can somone please help me [07:10] my icons keep vanishing with any input. if i right click anyware on the desktop gone. if i try and start it gone. i already had ¨places¨ disapear i dont know how to bring it back? can somone please help me [07:13] what's this place? [07:15] I know nothing... [07:15] !hi | land [07:15] land: Hi! Welcome to #xubuntu! [07:15] !xubuntu [07:15] Xubuntu is Ubuntu with Xfce instead of !GNOME. More info at http://www.xubuntu.org and http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/ - To install from Ubuntu: « sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop » - Join #xubuntu for support - See also: !Ubuntu and !Xubuntu-Channels [07:16] * land says hi zoredache, ubottu [07:16] lol [07:16] guys, i need some help [07:18] ask a question, if someone knows they answer, they might just anser you [07:18] i'm on Mint; i'm havin' a hard time activating proprietary driver for my ATI graphics [07:18] Xfce keeps fucking with my desktop icons they keep vanashing with a click. evertime this happens i need to go into desktop settings and un check and re check allow Xfce to manage desktop [07:20] !nvidia [07:20] For Ati/NVidia/Matrox video cards, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto [12:15] hi all [12:15] where is xorg.conf xubuntu 8.10 [12:23] what do you want make with xorg.conf [12:23] /etc/X11/xorg.conf === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [12:44] ye [12:44] yes [12:45] I do X -configure [12:45] hi [12:45] I have a problem with compilation libraries: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/122363/ [12:46] thats only happen at Xubuntu, i dont have this problem on ubuntu [12:46] any idea? [12:51] I suppose the version of hylafax you're trying to compile has some very distinct differences to the one that can be installed with the package manager [12:53] If i try with another older it could be better? [12:53] Angolares: why are you trying to compile it? [12:54] !info hylafax-client [12:54] hylafax-client (source: hylafax): Flexible client/server fax software - client utilities. In component universe, is extra. Version 2:4.4.4-7 (intrepid), package size 367 kB, installed size 964 kB [12:54] !info hylafax-server [12:54] hylafax-server (source: hylafax): Flexible client/server fax software - server daemons. In component universe, is extra. Version 2:4.4.4-7 (intrepid), package size 868 kB, installed size 3440 kB [12:55] beacuse i only have the source [12:55] erm. [12:55] so why don't you install it with the package manager so you'd have the binaries? [12:56] you don't need to compile it [12:56] where can i find it? [12:56] the binaries? [12:56] in synaptic, search for hylafax [12:56] ok, i found it [12:58] i tried and the OS said that could not find hylafax-doc [13:18] Finally [13:18] Hylafax is installed [13:18] Myrtti? [13:18] yes? [13:19] you know hylafax? [13:19] nope [13:19] ok [13:19] I've used a fax machine about twenty years ago [13:19] :-D [13:19] i have one how to of suse and hylafax... but i think is not the same [13:20] i write faxsetup and not really runs setup [13:27] Did anyone ever get OpenArena running in Xubuntu? It just doesn't start for me, any ideas? [14:32] hi [14:33] hi [16:06] hallo [16:07] hello cybernaut [16:07] hello, this is english-speaking, ok [16:07] yes [16:08] does anybody know if it exists for xfce: i am looking for something wich shows me when a cd is inserted and offers me the possibility to eject the cd within xfce [16:08] you mean "the drive shows up on the desktop"? [16:08] When you put your CD in the drive, it should popup in Thunar's mounted devices list, and if you right click it, you should get the "Eject" option [16:08] He "ejected" himself :p [16:09] When you put your CD in the drive, it should popup in Thunar's mounted devices list, and if you right click it, you should get the "Eject" option [16:10] SiDi: I think that was broke in Hardy, wasn't it? [16:11] Don't know, i never used Xubuntu Hardy [16:11] are you starting xfce from gdm or startx ? [16:11] SiDi: thank you, so thunar is the solution [16:11] vidd: the drive should show on desktop, i wish : [16:11] :) [16:12] btw, i am using intrepid [16:13] which windowmanager do you use ? [16:13] cybernaut, it used to do that...but that functionality has dropped [16:13] dropped ? hmm sounds strange [16:13] * vidd uses slim on some machines and gdm on others [16:14] slim sounds interesting, never heard of [16:14] with ootb xubu 8.04 xfce 4 and thunar 0.9.0 cd has popped up on desktop and a window of files [16:14] ootb? [16:14] cybernaut: you can use nautilus's desktop at worse (i feel someone's gonna slap me for this) [16:14] feel like * [16:14] out-of-the-box [16:15] *slap* SiDi [16:15] Thanks [16:15] so you think xfce is not the worst :) [16:15] Does thunar/Xfce use the gconf settings for displaying volumes on the desktop ? [16:15] no [16:15] * vidd actually prefers openbox/slim combo over xfce/gdm [16:18] cybernaut: We do show the cd drive in Jaunty. Also, putting in a cd makes it show up on desktop [16:20] Hi charlie-tca, jaunty is a new information for me. i will check it out. thank yo [16:20] cybernaut, jaunty is the next release....still in testing...due out in april [16:22] jaunty is post intrepid. wow [16:22] and jaunty with xfce has new options you mean [16:24] btw, when will xubuntu come with its own human-based theme ? :O [16:25] ive heard that ubuntu is leaving dirt-brown behind in 9.10 [16:25] Why would we? [16:28] Because it'd look better after a fresh install, charlie-tca :p [16:28] i don't like xfce's default xfwm :( [16:42] thank you for your infos [17:13] i like xfce's default theme....I think it's sharp. Each to their own I suppose. [17:14] * wormsxulla likes the rat [17:18] its a rat ? i thougt it is a mouse [17:19] :) i prefer to think of it as a rat (black rat for me) [17:19] I thought it was a mouse, too [17:20] * wormsxulla sulks [17:20] it could be a rat, maybe? [17:20] * wormsxulla smiles [17:21] (for somebody) [17:21] :) [17:24] its a mouse.... [17:25] you guys are destroying my dreams [17:25] the rat's tail is proportinally larger compared to the body [17:29] wormsxulla, your dreams are faulty. come up with replacement ones. [17:32] http://vertex.corpsmoderne.net/main.php?g2_itemId=36 [17:32] that's my wallpaper, you can see it's a big RAT :p [17:33] looks like a mouse to me... [17:33] All the rats I have seen are definitely different [17:34] ahahah [17:34] i actually can't really tell the difference, it's a matter of perspective [17:35] wormsxulla, you see a rat, you will be able to tell =] [17:35] * charlie-tca nods [17:47] which vm application (vmware/virtualbox) runs nicely on xubuntu? [17:47] *runs/installs [17:47] VirtualBox [17:48] is the one I use [17:48] <_Pete_> vmware server runs/installs nicely on my xubuntu [17:49] <_Pete_> and also have virtualbox [17:49] _Pete_: v1, or v2? [17:49] _Pete_: would you suggest one over the other? [17:49] <_Pete_> zoredache: v2 [17:50] <_Pete_> crazygir: it depends how you like to use those [17:50] I've really only used vmware, but having watched a friend bang his head through vmware/ubuntu, I'm starting to wonder [17:50] _Pete_: did you have to do something special to get the firefox-plugin for the console to work? [17:50] is there a way to get xfce 4.6 (rc1) into Xubuntu using a dpkg repository ? [17:50] <_Pete_> zoredache: no [17:51] trying to install vb returns an error, any way to find out what the actual error was? [17:51] personally I prefer vmware over virtual box, but then I have a farm of 15 ESX servers, so I have a bit of a bias towards building vms compatible with the rest of our infrastucture. [17:52] you sure do :) [17:52] understandably [17:52] glitsj16: it is in jaunty [17:52] !daily [17:52] Daily builds of the CD images of the current development version of Ubuntu are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/ and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ [17:53] <_Pete_> one thing that prevents me to use virtualbox is it's missing ability to run vm's in background which can be done with wmware workstation and server [17:53] what do you mean by background? [17:53] without the console up? [17:53] charlie-tca: thanks, i was specifically looking to see if the recent xfdesktop is able to present the right-click menu when compiz wallpaper plugin renders wallpapers on all workspaces [17:53] <_Pete_> crazygir: yes [17:54] in this case that's ok [17:54] but yea, I see why that would be frustrating [17:54] why does the package manager complain about errors but not *give* you the errors? [17:55] crazygir: because errors frightten some people? So they hid them? [17:55] zoredache: hiding is fine, but no "click here for more info" ? [17:55] that's completely unacceptable [17:56] sure, dumb down the system, that's fine, but don't limit the people who might know how to fix something [17:56] or be able to figure it out [17:56] *enable* the user [17:56] zoredache: how would you find out what the package manager b0rked on? [17:56] there is always the terminal if you want the nitty-gritty details [17:57] that'd be nice if I knew how to use the package manager in the terminal :P [17:57] guess I'll have to figure that one out [17:57] ah, to install a package you use a command like 'apt-get install packagename' [17:57] still seems unacceptably lame not to at least give you a way to get the error [17:58] to update the package definitions do a 'apt-get update' [17:58] to apply updates do a 'apt-get dist-upgrade' [17:58] put an sudo in front of all of those if you aren't already in a root shell [17:58] to search? [17:58] apt-cache search pattern [17:58] ah apt-cache [17:58] silly linux [17:59] or just look on packages.ubuntu.com [17:59] * crazygir nods [17:59] thanks zoredache [18:00] HAH, so it works with apt-get [18:00] silly silly silly [18:00] I guess the gui package manager didn't like figuring out dependencies and installing them [18:02] maybe, it usually works mostly ok, but then I almost never actually use it [18:03] question.. I'm using xubuntu at work cause it is (hopefully) simple and usable, and windows drives me insane. When I reinstall my own unix systems, I simply backup/restore /etc and /home to get my settings back. Is this as simple/straightforward in xubuntu? [18:03] crazygir, yup [18:03] (ie, could I simply backup/restore /etc and /home?) [18:03] nice [18:04] crazygir: there are some things under /var you would want to backup too maybe. [18:04] there shouldn't be [18:04] which apps/services? [18:05] I for example really like knowing the list of packages installed which is found int /var [18:05] the idea is to be able to get back up and running after a wipe/install/upgrade as simply and quickly as possible [18:05] zoredache: good to know :) [18:08] hi [18:08] if you are running a web server or database server your data would be in /var/www or /var/lib/mysql [18:08] sure [18:08] that's not config though [18:09] no, but it is data. That is the type of thing you would want to backup/restore if you do a full system wipe [18:10] sure [18:10] could someone help me?? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/122496/ [18:11] Angolares: try doing an 'apt-get install build-essential' [18:11] I created a new partition and want to modify fstab to mount this, how do I determine what the UUID should be? [18:12] the command vol_id /dev/name would work [18:12] you could also just put the device name into your fstab instead of the UUID [18:12] i did it [18:12] but always the same message [18:13] cool cool [18:13] Angolares: just out of curiosity, is there some reasy why are you trying to compile it instead of using the version from the repositories? [18:14] Angolares: apt-get install hylafax-server hylafax-client [18:16] i did it too apt-get... but one part of that have an error and do not install faxgetty, and after that they said that the solutio is do a new compile ... [18:18] hi there! where can I get a fresh sources.list for my 7.10 xubuntu install? [18:19] o/ ! [18:19] I see, you might try doing an apt-get build-dep hylafax-server hylafax-client and then an apt-get source hylafax and rebuilding from that [18:20] ok, iḿ gonna trty [18:20] try [18:20] m4rk: did you delete the old one, or what? If you are just needed the standard repositories then you should be able to copy a source.list for a current and replace the release name with fiesty or whatever 7.10 was [18:21] zoredache: my old one is funted [18:22] I messed it up. I just want a new one with standard repositories [18:22] no, I think the problem is that the repositories is not saving at the correct place [18:22] m4rk: I will get one and pastebin it for you. [18:22] charlie-tca: thanks :-) [18:23] I am about to install nvidia's driver for Geforce 9series, and I am recommended to set default run level so that system boots to vga-console. how do I do that? I know how to stop x, but not how not to boot to x... edit bootoptions in grublist? [18:23] m4rk: 386 or amd64? [18:23] i386 [18:25] charlie-tca: does your sources.list have the architecure listed in it? [18:25] It should; let me bring it up and see [18:26] bringing up 7.10 now [18:27] zoredache: Only for the cd [18:27] Serial port that modem is connected to [ttyS0]? How can I know where is my modem conected to? [18:28] !pastebin [18:28] pastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. The Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu.com (make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic) [18:28] are u talking to me? [18:29] ahh, ok [18:29] Angolares: gernerallyIf I don't know, generally, I just have to start guessing numbers it is usually something like /dev/ttyS? [18:29] but there are a lot of ttyS [18:29] it might be easier to find if you install minicom. [18:30] m4rk: http://paste.ubuntu.com/122502/ [18:30] really, on my system there are only 4 [18:31] Grrai: use recovery mode from the Grub menu; select root session [18:32] is there a way to get more than 800x600 resolution? on a 19 inch monitor connected to a laptop? help anyone? [18:34] ah right, thanks charlie-tca [18:35] whabo: try booting to recovery mode with it connected, select XFix from the menu. [18:36] ok thank you [18:36] If it doesn't work, let us know [18:37] Trying to get printing work by HP Laserjet 3100. [18:38] driver manager doesnt accept the sudo password. Any ideas whats wrong? [18:38] Could I apply this: http://www.kivela.net/jaska/projects/lj3100/ [18:39] could someone tell me if found what port is conected to the modem?? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/122504/ [18:39] I suppose I should downgrade ghostscript and find some alternative to printtool at least. [18:39] charlie-tca: thanks for that mate. just about to eat my dinner, I will let you know how I go though! [18:39] zoredache: thanks also :) [18:40] You may need to login as the original user when Xubuntu was installed and use that password. [18:40] Trijntje: ^ ^ ^ [18:40] Printing does not work in Xubuntu 8.10: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hplip/+bug/332188 [18:41] Thats is what i do. I can use the password to do sudo apt-get install foo, but not to acces driver management [18:41] tempuser: That pretty well says it. Did you got to the answers link given? [18:42] What version, Trijntje [18:43] guys i tried xfix no luck [18:44] just that as im using an external monitor its just letting me use the max resolution on 800x600 [18:44] charlie-tca: I have just installed kubuntu 8.04 while keeping the home directory from ubuntu 8.04 [18:45] Wow, there are just too many people in #ubuntu [18:45] * Pres-Gas wonders how questons get answered in there with so many people. [18:45] Trijntje: that may be the problem. The config files might be fighting each other, I don't know. [18:46] charlie-tca: that is too bad, i thought it was quite possible to do that sort of thing with linux [18:47] ok :) My girfriend is coming this evening [18:47] And i can`t see external USB disk with movies [18:47] It worked just hour ago and I umounted it and turned off [18:47] nikolam: does lsusb show it? [18:47] Now I can`t see it in Xubuntu [18:47] Trijntje: most things are possible. Sometimes though, it doesn´t quite work [18:48] lsusb showed just the hub and mouse [18:48] nikolam: check the cable then [18:48] Trijntje: that would be something to file a bug on, though [18:48] And after re-connecting hub, lsusb get stuck for few minutes [18:48] and now it displays the same. no hub, no disk [18:49] but i have partition`s icons on desktop [18:49] charlie-tca: i just tried again and i get a different 'password required' windows (without the option to remember) and it works now [18:49] do you have enough ports to connect it directly without the hub? [18:49] even after it is disconnected [18:49] its magic.. [18:49] nikolam: what dmesg | tail says? [18:49] i have just a sec [18:49] nikolam: use a pastebin [18:51] i think that dmesg | tail is useless because it is full of ppp0 output [18:51] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/122511/ [18:52] still no device on usb [18:52] i mostly can connect usb disk on machine only once per boot [18:53] do you properly unmount it before you disconnect it? [18:53] it is 690g amd motherboard with sb600 south bridge [18:53] yes i use panel applet, desktop umount, thunar umount and nothing [18:53] can anyone please help me .. i cant get a higher resolution than 800x600 :S i am using a laptop with an external monitor ... (19 inch wide) i really want a higher resolution i can't see anything TOO big. help [18:53] only pcmanfm umount says it can umoumt it [18:53] And i umount it with sudo [18:54] whabo, lspci to find out what graphics chip you use. Also check maximal resolution for external monitor in nbook specifications. What is model? [18:55] I am on 64-bit hardy [18:56] ok i will 1 sec [18:56] charlie-tca: Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by getting the answers link given. [18:57] tempuser: from the bug report: There is more information in https://answers.launchpad.net/hplip/+question/54810 (Read especially my comments.) [18:57] Did you read the question and answers? [18:59] yep its an ATI and the max resolution is Resolution: 1,680x1050 [19:00] charlie-tca: Yes. I actually made the bug report. [19:01] whabo, what ati [19:01] tempuser: I see [19:01] ATI 340 M [19:02] its intergrated laptop graphics card [19:02] nikolam: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=164996 [19:02] http://www.kivela.net/jaska/projects/lj3100/ I got from the answers page. === Grrai is now known as Ghrr|ost [19:03] whabo, it is RS200 chip http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ATI_chipsets [19:03] tempuser: Didn't look to me like the lj3100 is really gonna work in Ubuntu [19:04] yes it is that [19:04] nikolam: also http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=188802 [19:04] thast what the lspci told me [19:04] RS200 [19:04] RS200/RS200m chip [19:05] TheSheep, great, maybe i will set it on internal drive in that external case. but i think it foes the same for usb memory flash drives, nevermind, i will reboot for now.. [19:06] whabo, it seems that open source driver is best for that chip [19:06] fglrx << should i try this one? [19:06] it says its for media accelerator drivers [19:06] whabo, see #radeon, #radeonhd [19:07] nikolam: it's generally a hardware error, check the cable, the hub, the jumpers, etc. [19:07] i don`t think you should try it [19:07] nikolam i am only getting 800x600 resolution [19:07] TheSheep, ok, i think that is something about usb sontroller support on sb600 south bridge [19:08] whabo, try to install radeon driver [19:08] ok thank you [19:14] TheSheep, i found it : 690g/sb600 with usb: http://groups.google.com/group/x1250/browse_thread/thread/89b59d62236488e8?hide_quotes=no#msg_d7fee782ac1f7201 [19:15] http://groups.google.com/group/x1250/browse_thread/thread/6c00f58258a24c35# [19:15] TheSheep, http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=120782765829450&w=2 [19:15] no luck for me, seems that it is fixed in 2.6.25+ [19:16] nikolam: I bet iot's the cable, 99% of the time it is the cable === Ghrr|ost is now known as Grr|oltergeist [19:16] TheSheep, in this case it`s not. on other machine works fine and flash have probs too [19:17] nevermind TheSheep , will reboot [19:19] charlie-tca: maybe so, but could http://www.kivela.net/jaska/projects/lj3100/ applied somehow in ubuntu? === Grr|oltergeist is now known as Grrai [19:21] tempuser: Last modified: Sat Sep 27 16:26:16 EET DST 2003 [19:22] how can i switch from XOrg to Xrandr because my log file of XOrg says that Xrandr output would be 1680x1050 > here is my log file thank you guys for everything http://pastebin.com/m5121401c [19:23] whabo: you are confused [19:23] whabo: xrandr is part of xorg [19:23] whabo: see xrandr --help [19:24] Hi all, i'm trying to get flash working in firefox on a fresh install. I have flashplugin-nonfree installed (via firefoxs ´install missing plugin') but somehow firefox cant use it [19:24] Myrtti: so it was working a long time ago. [19:24] tempuser: what I mean is that I wouldn't blindly go attempting to use that page since it's quite old [19:25] tempuser: don't use that, install flashplugin-nonfree with synaptic [19:25] tempuser: sorry [19:25] Trijntje: that was for you :) [19:26] whabo did you install radeon driver, also check #radeon and #radeonh channels for support [19:27] thesheep: I already have that installed, i think firefox did that [19:28] Trijntje, no... install it via synaptic or it wont install correctly [19:31] vidd, ok, ill uninstall it first, and then reinstall it [19:33] vidd, Plugin is not installed: md5 mismatch [19:33] says apt-get [19:48] well, ill try to fix it some other time, cu later all [19:48] The following packages have been kept back: [19:48] linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic [19:48] linux-restricted-modules-generic lp-solve openoffice.org [19:48] openoffice.org-base openoffice.org-base-core openoffice.org-calc [19:48] openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-draw [19:48] openoffice.org-filter-binfilter openoffice.org-impress [19:48] openoffice.org-math openoffice.org-officebean [19:48] openoffice.org-style-human openoffice.org-writer python-uno [19:48] Why is this? [19:49] !pastebin | likemindead [19:49] likemindead: pastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. The Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu.com (make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic) [19:49] And how do I get them to install? [19:49] M'kay. [19:50] Any help? [19:50] don't know, whatever it was that you tried to post didn't come through for me [19:50] Ah... one sec. [19:51] likemindead: use a fscking paste bin service damn it [19:51] http://paste.ubuntu.com/122535/ [19:51] M'kay. [19:52] Why are they being "held back" & how do I rectify? [19:52] ah, I was expecting more detail. What are you doing, what command did you run that gave you that output? [19:53] Just a good ol' sudo apt-get update and then sudo apt-get upgrade is all. [19:53] Weird. [19:53] you probably want to use 'dist-upgrade' [19:53] upgrade will not add/remove packages [19:53] Ah. Those are Jaunty packages? [19:53] if a package depends on something new, then it won't be allowed to be upgraded [19:54] Oh. So this is normal for 8.10 users? [19:54] likemindead: I don't know, are they? Are you pointed at jaunty in your sources.list? [19:55] Negative. Ibex all the way. [19:55] I don't know if it is normal. I have mostly been letting the update manager do all that stuff lately [19:56] Yeah, if I run the GUI update mangaer it warns me that I can only do a "partial upgrade" but doesn't say why. [19:57] do you have backports, or some other unofficial repositories enabled? [19:58] anyway run the dist-upgrade. Apt will tell you exactly what it wants to add/remove [19:58] No backports. Maybe the Banshee and OOo 3.0 repos. [19:58] Ah. Cool. [19:59] Just "sudo dist-upgrade" ? [19:59] apt-get dist-upgrade [19:59] sudo as well, if you aren't in a root shell [19:59] Thanks. Also: http://paste.ubuntu.com/122536/ [20:09] how come some packages are available from apt-get (cli) and not the gui package manager? [20:10] crazygir: depends on what package manager you use [20:10] gui one, I mean [20:10] I've noticed that Add/Remove doesn't list them all [20:10] synaptic has everything, though [20:11] crazygir: I almost never use the gui except for automatic updates... It sure seems like the same should be avaiable in both though [20:13] yea, add/remove sucks :P [20:13] its searching capability is also rather blah [20:14] I don't quite understand why both are distributed though [20:14] seems like a good place for confusion [20:17] the other is for beginners, other for intermediate/experts [20:17] whats that ubuntu and xubuntu? [20:18] no, add/remove and synaptic [20:19] oh they seem to work about the same for me. lol [20:22] Sw3RvE: not everything is available in add/remove [20:23] * crazygir curses GNU mv [20:23] oh [20:23] why can't it operate the same as every other unix mv? [20:23] * crazygir growls [20:23] whats does it do differently? [20:23] i wish i could get the internet to work on dsl [20:29] intronets [20:29] intertubes [20:29] interotubes [20:45] Myrtti: There is newer upload at http://www.linuxprinting.org/download/printing/hplj_3100_3150/ bu the msgs are from year 2000. [20:58] zoredache: apt-get, synaptic-package-manger, and add/remove use different databases, as I understand it. [21:12] Could somebody help me with repository indexes failing to download? [21:13] Certainly [21:13] What error are you getting? [21:13] is there a way to install a network adapter driver using terminal [21:13] hold on a sec, im just about to pastebin it [21:14] http://pastebin.com/m3d9bab33 [21:14] im a new linux user, so still finding my way around the system [21:16] any ideas? [21:19] atrox_: try a different mirror [21:24] can anyone help me with screen resolution [21:25] what is the issue exactly? [21:25] whabo, i meant :) [21:25] i want to change my LVDS to VGA-0 permanently . as my laptop screen is broken .. and its only giving me a 1024x768 on a 19 inch wide screen [21:26] i can show you my xorg.log [21:26] and my xrandr file [21:26] it is only giving me what my laptop's screen resolution is on my 19 inch wide screen [21:27] are you using ati or Nvidia drivers? how are you editing the screen resolution? [21:27] i am using an ATI [21:27] its a 340 m laptop intergrated chip [21:28] i am editing my screen resolution through the settings manager in xubuntu [21:28] so are you trying to set this with ATIconfig in terminal or through a GUI? [21:28] its only giving me what my aptop is capable of [21:28] GUI [21:29] however i tried xrandr command to shutoff LVDS woked but when i made VGA-0 as auto i lost my menu and icons i couldnt see anything but only the opened window [21:30] brandon do you want me to paste bin any logs? [21:32] i sent you a message whabo [21:33] i saw it i sent u 1 back thx [21:56] charlie-tca: are you still here? [21:56] yes [21:57] cool. I am getting connection timeoutes from some of the sources in that sources.list you gave me... us.archive.ubuntu.com and security.ubuntu.com [21:58] is that just me? some of them seem to work [21:58] They may just be real busy. You can try removing the us. from them. Then it goes straight to the main server. [21:59] ok dokey [21:59] Updates all over the USA go through us.archive for all versions [21:59] what about the security. ones? [22:00] I don't know any other server for them. It's just a very busy server right now. [22:00] okey dokey [22:00] I am in the UK, but I was getting timeouts from UK server also [22:00] sounds like we need more mirrors :) [22:01] Yeah, as the user base grows, so must the servers [22:08] BIG [22:12] I got http://archive.ubuntu.com feisty-backports/main/debian-installer Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.31 80] [22:13] is this significant? [22:14] You should not have any feisty sources [22:14] Is that in 8.10? [22:15] 7.10? [22:15] Feisty has no more sources, so that should give a 404 error [22:15] I dunno, I got it when running apt-get update using the sorces.list u gave me :( [22:16] Nope. There are no Feisty sources in that list [22:17] yeah I see that, I dunno what is going on [22:18] do you have anything in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ [22:18] however I can now boot to the xfce again, so this is progress [22:18] no, not for 7.10 [22:18] no, I don't have sources.list.d [22:20] * charlie-tca keep my mouth shut. He wasn't talking to me. [22:21] I ran apt-get dist_upgrade which seemed to finish but did not update a bunch of stuff. now I can get into xfce again (it kept dying before) and wicd seems to be working again. The Update Manager is offering me a partial upgrade now [22:21] Did you run an apt-get update first? [22:21] charlie-tca: yep [22:22] Maybe it could only apply part of the updates, then it needs a restart, then update again [22:22] ok [22:25] oh crap, I actually do have a bunch of stuff in sources.list.d [22:25] medibuntu.list, medibuntu.list.save and prerequisits-sources.list [22:27] Then you need to make sure they get changed from feisty to gutsy [22:40] do I just change "feisty" to "gutsy" in those files or do I need to get the latest files? [22:41] Yes, you should be able to do that. [22:41] you can try changing them from fiesty to gutsy. If it doesn't work, then you'll need to disable/update them [22:42] * charlie-tca nods. What zoredache said. [22:55] well thanks guys. it is "running partial upgrade" with about 1 hours 5 minutes remaining [22:55] I am gonna go and hit the sack now. I'll check it out in the morning. thanks for your help! :) [23:08] man.....i could sure use some sleep right now........tis only 4:00 in the afternoon though [23:24] seems the 64bit doesn't have support for atom 330 yet :( [23:24] What is atom 330? [23:24] from intel [23:25] here's the kernel panic trace i got - http://pastebin.com/m10cd6b0e [23:30] i've tried adding hpet, nohpet, noapic, acpi=off ... i keep getting same trace [23:30] What does uname -m give you? [23:33] the problem is i can't get past the install screen... only thing that successfully works that i've tried is "test memory"... "boot from first hard disk" should probably work as well... but i can't even check cd for defects [23:33] & yes, the atom 330 is a 64bit... so is the atom 230 [23:33] Only thing I could suggest then is install the 32bit version [23:34] It will work. [23:57] why is xubuntu so buggy ? [23:58] You will have to expand greatly on that one.