anakron | hi all | 00:06 |
---|---|---|
anakron | someone can look this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pwman3/+bug/299130 | 00:08 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 299130 in pwman3 "spelling mistake in synaptics-description" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 00:08 |
=== Aquina is now known as Aquina_ | ||
=== Aquina_ is now known as Aquina | ||
savvas | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-wxgtk2.8_2.8.9.1-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/wx/__version__.py', which is also in package python-wxgtk2.6 | 00:50 |
savvas | dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) | 00:50 |
savvas | python-wxgtk2.8 breaks when python-wxgtk2.6 is already installed | 00:51 |
* savvas files a bug :P | 00:51 | |
anakron | :O your first bug | 00:53 |
anakron | XD | 00:53 |
savvas | anakron: for today? yeah hehe | 00:56 |
savvas | :) | 00:56 |
anakron | :) | 00:57 |
anakron | im a little bit angry with some packagers | 00:57 |
anakron | :@ | 00:57 |
anakron | i like to fix some bugs with desktop file problems, but some of them have like 9 errors if you look it with desktop-file-validate | 00:58 |
anakron | some entries duplicated ... i could go | 00:59 |
JontheEchidna | Aren't upstreams generally responsible for .desktop files? | 00:59 |
JontheEchidna | Although I suppose the packagers should report the problems upstream in the first place... | 01:00 |
anakron | in one desktop file an icon path sets an xml file | 01:00 |
anakron | ... | 01:00 |
anakron | yes i think too | 01:00 |
anakron | but, trying to fix a bug, i found some others | 01:00 |
Amaranth | an icon path sets an xml file? | 01:01 |
anakron | yes | 01:02 |
anakron | XD | 01:02 |
savvas | anakron: there are more serious problems with .desktop files: http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel/browse_thread/thread/6f38b567c5684a60?pli=1 | 01:02 |
anakron | :O | 01:07 |
savvas | :p | 01:11 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
ScottK | Also some .desktop files predate the FDO spec. | 02:02 |
fabrice_sp | Hi. How can I see why a package in Debian does not exist in Ubuntu? It's mig (http://packages.debian.org/lenny/mig) | 02:31 |
fabrice_sp | weird: it's in Ubuntu, but it does not appear through packages.ubuntu.com | 02:32 |
ajmitch | that generally happens if it failed to build | 02:33 |
fabrice_sp | ajmitch, that's what I was looking for ;-) Thanks | 02:33 |
* ajmitch can't recall where build logs are on LP now | 02:34 | |
fabrice_sp | you're right: there is a cyclic dependency between mig and gnumach | 02:35 |
ajmitch | that doesn't surprise me, given the intent of mig | 02:35 |
StevenK | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mig/+bug/174851 | 02:35 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 174851 in mig "mig and gnumach need a manual boot-strapping on the buildds" [Undecided,New] | 02:35 |
fabrice_sp | (mig build depends on gnumach, but gnumach depends on mig?!) | 02:35 |
ajmitch | why do you want it? | 02:35 |
fabrice_sp | was just looking for all FTBFS to try to fix them | 02:35 |
ajmitch | ah | 02:35 |
ajmitch | ignore that one then :) | 02:36 |
fabrice_sp | yep :-) | 02:36 |
ajmitch | unless you really feel inspired to port ubuntu to the hurd | 02:36 |
fabrice_sp | (already ignore some of them :-) ) | 02:36 |
fabrice_sp | hmmm, not really! :-) | 02:36 |
Amaranth | shouldn't those packages be removed from ubuntu then? | 02:41 |
pschulz01 | anyone have a package which is a good example of 'debconf' settings? | 03:17 |
pschulz01 | s/have/know of/ | 03:17 |
dtchen_ | pschulz01: just about any of the output from `apt-cache rdepends debconf|grep -v debconf-` should be a starting point | 03:21 |
pschulz01 | dtchen_: Ta.. 'adduser' seems to be a good (simple) one, and postfix gets a little more complicated. | 03:25 |
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth | ||
=== jdong is now known as hanoi_tower_2 | ||
=== jdong_ is now known as jdong | ||
=== hanoi_tower_2 is now known as jdong_ | ||
ScottK | The postfix package combines a number of complex advanced packaging techniques and has accumulated some cruft over the course of the decade it's existed. Probably not the best sample. | 04:04 |
dtchen_ | ScottK: hi, do you mind sponsoring both debdiffs for bug 336100, please? | 04:12 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 336100 in chkconfig "package sysvinit-utils 2.86.ds1-61ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/service.8.gz', which is also in package chkconfig" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/336100 | 04:12 |
* ScottK looks | 04:13 | |
ScottK | dtchen_: Is the man page the only thing that conflicts between the two packages? | 04:18 |
dtchen_ | ScottK: yes, but it doesn't make much sense to only remove the conflicting man page | 04:20 |
dtchen_ | kirkland made a similar fix for sysvconfig | 04:21 |
ScottK | It seems odd that we patch service into sysvinit | 04:21 |
ScottK | And then don't use the other one. | 04:22 |
ScottK | dtchen_: From reading the man pages it looks like the chkconfig supports a status-all command that the sysvinit-utils one does not. | 04:24 |
dtchen_ | ScottK: unless i'm misreading sysvinit's debian/patches/94_service.dpatch, it does | 04:30 |
ScottK | dtchen_: I thought it provided service, but not service-all. I'm kind of tired though, so I might be misreading it. | 04:31 |
dtchen_ | there's no mention of service-all in either, but status-all is properly supported/compatible | 04:33 |
ScottK | Sorry , status-all was what I meant. | 04:33 |
ScottK | Did I mention I was tired .... | 04:33 |
rgreening | o/ ScottK | 04:34 |
ScottK | Heya rgreening. | 04:35 |
rgreening | your not the only tired one. I think 4 hrs sleep in 2 nights | 04:35 |
ScottK | dtchen_: Uploaded. Thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu. | 04:37 |
rgreening | ScottK: got any small jobs that need done. emphasis small... :) | 04:37 |
ScottK | Plenty of Python bugs yet to squash. | 04:38 |
rgreening | throw one at me | 04:38 |
ScottK | rgreening: Are you on Jaunty? | 04:38 |
rgreening | yes | 04:38 |
ScottK | Then apt-cache rdepends python2.4 and pick anything not related to zope. | 04:39 |
rgreening | ok. i'll look | 04:39 |
ScottK | The only ones I've specifically looked and and not done already don't qualify as small. | 04:39 |
rgreening | lol | 04:40 |
dtchen_ | ScottK: thanks | 04:40 |
rgreening | ScottK: ok, I'll take a look at balder2d | 04:51 |
ScottK | Great. | 04:52 |
rgreening | no p0romises :) | 04:56 |
rgreening | hehe | 04:56 |
rgreening | ScottK: though, if I have luck like I did for the last python fix, who knows. | 04:57 |
* ScottK is off to bed. | 04:57 | |
ScottK | I can look at it tomorrow if no one else does. | 04:57 |
superm1 | dtchen_, is there a particular reason you're holding off requesting sponsorship to get bug 336965 resolved since you have a solution ready? | 05:33 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 336965 in pulseaudio "[Jaunty Regression] Severe Audio Distortion" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/336965 | 05:33 |
superm1 | (like trying to convince kernel team to upload with a PREEMPT enabled kernel to solve the problem etc) | 05:34 |
dtchen_ | superm1: i already raised the possibility of enabling PREEMPT for -generic in jaunty with members of the kernel team | 05:47 |
dtchen_ | superm1: the proposal was disapproved | 05:47 |
dtchen_ | superm1: (it was deemed too late in the devel cycle to enable such a kernel config option) | 05:48 |
dtchen_ | (...nevermind that it used to be enabled many releases ago...) | 05:48 |
TheMuso | Well if its any ocmfort, we are not the only ones who don't have it enabled. | 05:49 |
dtchen_ | superm1: so - the only other option is to disable glitch-free again | 05:49 |
TheMuso | comfort | 05:49 |
dtchen_ | TheMuso: right | 05:49 |
dtchen_ | i'm not interested in laying blame anywhere. i've been given operating parameters by the kernel team, so i'll work within them. | 05:50 |
dtchen_ | if i wanted politics, i would have chosen another project ;) | 05:50 |
dtchen_ | disabling glitch-free isn't really a bad option. i'll continue hacking away at PA to not eat so many resources, but i'm not going to drastically alter its behaviour. lennart would have my skull. | 05:51 |
dtchen_ | anyhoo, it's Z time | 05:52 |
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth | ||
Laibsch | rgreening: can you upload packages? | 06:07 |
rgreening | not yet. | 06:28 |
rgreening | ask me after March 13th MOTU meeting :) | 06:28 |
TheMuso | Laibsch: WHat would you like looked at? | 06:29 |
Hobbsee | bugs-- | 06:35 |
Laibsch | TheMuso: thanks | 06:36 |
Laibsch | bug 335891, for example | 06:36 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 335891 in audacious "[jaunty] audacious crashes immediately" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/335891 | 06:36 |
Laibsch | should be ready to upload | 06:37 |
Laibsch | furthermore, python-4suite-xml and python-kaa-metadata need to be made compatible with python 2.6, they depend on python < 2.6 | 06:38 |
Laibsch | It could be that unlike many other packages, it is not a simple recompile job | 06:39 |
Laibsch | I tried simply recompiling python-4suite-xml yesterday and it failed: https://launchpad.net/~r0lf/+archive/ppa/+build/890212 | 06:40 |
Laibsch | It is lacking one of the new python options, but I did not get around to retrying, yet | 06:41 |
TheMuso | Laibsch: uploaded the audacious debdiff, don't have time for the others sorry. | 06:46 |
Laibsch | TheMuso: great, thanks | 06:49 |
Laibsch | One more to cross off | 06:49 |
didrocks | hello there | 06:56 |
slytherin | hi all. anybody here with acer laptop with atheros wireless card? | 06:57 |
rgreening | ScottK: I have a working balder2d. Seems to behave just fine with python2.6 build dep. | 07:07 |
rgreening | ScottK: I'll submit a bug report for sponsoring later. | 07:07 |
AnAnt | superm1: dkms is in Debian's NEW & BYHAND since 2 weeks ! | 07:11 |
superm1 | AnAnt, ah wonderful! | 07:12 |
superm1 | i'm not sure what BYHAND is | 07:12 |
superm1 | but NEW is good news | 07:12 |
AnAnt | superm1: something like Ubuntu's queue (the stage after REVU) | 07:12 |
superm1 | AnAnt, great. i'm hoping the packaging is very similar (or identical) to the Ubuntu packaging, but if not i'll have to work with those guys to come to a consensus | 07:13 |
AnAnt | superm1: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/dkms_2.0.21.0-1.html | 07:15 |
AnAnt | superm1: although I dunno how to get the diff.gz ! | 07:15 |
superm1 | AnAnt, i can already tell there is some delta there | 07:15 |
AnAnt | superm1: it's not on debian mentors | 07:15 |
superm1 | i'll try to get ahold of the pieces and examine tomorrow | 07:15 |
AnAnt | btw, someone is making a package for cnetworkmanager (controlling NetworkManager under console) | 07:17 |
=== savvas_ is now known as savvas | ||
Toadstool | good morning! | 08:07 |
Hobbsee | morning Toadstool! | 08:08 |
Toadstool | hey Hobbsee! | 08:08 |
maxb | BYHAND is an unusual process where a package build submits arbitrary files as part of the upload for manual attention of the Debian ftp-masters, e.g. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405925 | 08:49 |
ubottu | Debian bug 405925 in doc-debian "doc-debian: Please ship BYHAND versions (for ftp.debian.org/debian/doc) of" [Wishlist,Open] | 08:49 |
savvas | should we remove bmpx package as well? | 09:31 |
savvas | "The bmpx package has been removed from Debian so we are closing the bugs that were still opened against it." | 09:31 |
savvas | pochu: here? should I file a bug report for bmpx removal? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517588 | 09:39 |
ubottu | Debian bug 517588 in bmpx "Please port bmpx to libsoup2.4" [Important,Closed] | 09:39 |
savvas | eh? | 09:39 |
savvas | "RM: bmpx -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, uses outdated libraries" | 09:40 |
savvas | :P | 09:40 |
pochu | savvas: I guess so, unless somebody objects | 09:40 |
savvas | ok :) | 09:40 |
eMerzh | Hi all, if a motu want to review my package at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/sqliteman i'll be glad to correct if there is errors :) | 10:08 |
savvas | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx/+bug/337659 | 10:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 337659 in bmpx "RM: bmpx -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, uses outdated libraries" [Undecided,New] | 10:09 |
_ruben | any hints on how to prevent stuff like this from happening: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcairo.so.2 could be avoided if "debian/open-vm-tools/usr/lib/open-vm-tools/plugins/vmusr/libresolutionSet.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). | 10:40 |
_ruben | im guessing its the fault of the software itself which does unnecesary linking? | 10:40 |
=== korn_ is now known as c_korn | ||
directhex | _ruben, it typically means the app is using "pkg-config --libs foo" and that's pulling in things it doesn't strictly needf | 11:01 |
directhex | e.g. "pkg-config --libs libavcodec" will link against libvorbisenc, even if not needed by the app | 11:02 |
_ruben | directhex: ic .. im guessing it might have something to do that the package has both cli and gui parts (seperate packages), and that the deps might be set too "global" .. | 11:03 |
_ruben | checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 (via pkg-config)... yes | 11:03 |
_ruben | gonna be a bitch to hunt this down (im merging an upstream release of open-vm-tools, for personal use) | 11:04 |
=== azeem_ is now known as azeem | ||
* _ruben kicks pkg-config around a bit | 11:35 | |
_ruben | i give up .. pkg-config seems to pull stuff out of its ass (or perhaps something else all together) | 12:14 |
pochu | _ruben: I think that's because some library is using Libs: when it wants Libs.private: | 12:18 |
_ruben | pochu: which would be something that's far beyond my current packaging skills :) | 12:19 |
pochu | _ruben: well, that's an upstream issue, although upstreams usually don't care about that | 12:20 |
pochu | _ruben: you can ignore the warning if you want | 12:20 |
_ruben | pochu: upstream of the affected libs? | 12:20 |
siretart | pochu: pkg-config is clearly underdocumented, so many upstreams write broken or at least suboptimal .pc files | 12:21 |
_ruben | pochu: well, unless im seeing things wrong, it results in unneeded dependencies | 12:21 |
siretart | the best we can do is to send fixes for broken .pc files upstream | 12:21 |
pochu | siretart: agreed | 12:23 |
pochu | siretart: there are some bugs/patches for pkg-config to document *.private | 12:23 |
pochu | but not merged yet though | 12:23 |
=== Kamping_Kaiser is now known as VK5FOSS | ||
=== VK5FOSS is now known as Kamping_Kaiser | ||
goshawk | RainCT: setting up pbulder-intrepid as you said.. | 13:14 |
AnAnt | Regarding debian bug #411851 , I tried the pm-utils hook script but it didn't work, does Ubuntu something else other than pm-utils for suspend/resume ? | 13:15 |
ubottu | Debian bug 411851 in sl-modem-daemon "slmodemd not restarted on resume" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/411851 | 13:15 |
goshawk | is it possible to install a package in a pbuilder environment for testing purposes? if yes, how? | 13:20 |
RainCT | goshawk: Yes, pbuilder --login | 13:21 |
goshawk | <goshawk> but my package is outside the chroot | 13:22 |
goshawk | <goshawk> i can't see it from there | 13:22 |
goshawk | <goshawk> i mean inside the chroot | 13:22 |
RainCT | goshawk: you can use --bindmounts to share a directory between the host and the chroot, but be warned that this will delete everything inside the directory that you tell it (at least cowbuilder does) | 13:22 |
directhex | or | 13:22 |
directhex | or or or | 13:22 |
directhex | cp foopkg /var/cache/pbuilder/build/*/tmp/ | 13:22 |
directhex | ^_^ | 13:23 |
geser | after pbuilder login | 13:23 |
goshawk | so i inject the package into the chroot environment | 13:23 |
RainCT | goshawk: so you can do something like: mkdir /tmp/test; pbuilder --login --bindmounts /tmp/test; cp <files> /tmp/test | 13:23 |
RainCT | directhex: uhm, right :) | 13:23 |
goshawk | i used your wrapper scripts pbuilder-intrepid for it, does it accept --login? it seems no Error: «--login» is not a recognized argument. | 13:23 |
directhex | goshawk, or use OTHERMIRROR and a PPA | 13:23 |
* RainCT remembers that | 13:23 | |
RainCT | goshawk: then just pbuilder-intrepid login | 13:24 |
goshawk | i copied the package into the chroot like directhex said :) | 13:25 |
goshawk | thx | 13:25 |
goshawk | no auto completition for pbuilder-dist login, isn't it? | 13:27 |
RainCT | nope | 13:28 |
RainCT | it's a minimal environment, so it hasn't much :) | 13:28 |
goshawk | i had to install the package with dpkg -i and then apt-get install -f for depends | 13:28 |
RainCT | (you can install additional stuff doing pbuilder-jaunty login --safe-after-login installing it, and logging out, but don't put much place into it or it may interfere with builds) | 13:29 |
RainCT | goshawk: That's right. You can also use "gdebi <file>.deb", which installs dependencies, but I'm not sure if that in the chroot | 13:30 |
slytherin | quadrispro: geser: Thanks for working on the libdvdread transitions. :-) | 13:32 |
goshawk | phone | 13:32 |
elmargol | I have 2 git branches... and i like to import some changed lines... is there an easy way to do it? | 13:36 |
rgreening | morning ScottK | 13:59 |
rgreening | I seem to have balder2d python fixed | 13:59 |
rgreening | just need to file proper bug | 13:59 |
ScottK | OK. Let me know and I'll take a look. | 14:00 |
ScottK | rgreening: Or just pastebin me the debdiff | 14:00 |
rgreening | sure | 14:01 |
rgreening | 1 sec | 14:01 |
rgreening | ScottK: try this http://paste.ubuntu.com/126280/ | 14:03 |
* ScottK looks | 14:04 | |
ScottK | rgreening: Did you test it works with 2.6? | 14:05 |
rgreening | yeah. got it insalled here. ran and played the game. tried a bunch of options. went to fullscreen | 14:05 |
rgreening | all seemed fine to me. | 14:05 |
rgreening | got killed a lot | 14:05 |
rgreening | :) | 14:06 |
ScottK | OK. | 14:06 |
ScottK | Why did you use just patch and not dpatch (dpatch is a lot less effort to integrate)? | 14:06 |
rgreening | never played with dpatch | 14:08 |
ScottK | rgreening: ^^^ | 14:08 |
rgreening | ^^ | 14:08 |
rgreening | :) | 14:08 |
rgreening | patch was copy/paste from the cookbook. | 14:09 |
ScottK | OK. Interesting. I've never actually seen someone do it that way before. | 14:09 |
rgreening | I had tried quilt, but got some errors. I went to lowest common denominator... | 14:09 |
rgreening | hehe | 14:10 |
ScottK | There is some argument in a case like this for just inline the changes and let MoM handle it. | 14:10 |
rgreening | old school from a new guy | 14:10 |
ScottK | ;-) | 14:10 |
ScottK | Also since it's not a K* program I wouldn't have put kubuntu in the patch name. | 14:10 |
rgreening | doh | 14:12 |
geser | ScottK: as you touched bmpx in the last days: any reason to keep it in Ubuntu? there is a removal request for it (bug #337659) I tend to confirm it | 14:12 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 337659 in bmpx "RM: bmpx -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, uses outdated libraries" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/337659 | 14:12 |
rgreening | ScottK: force of habit | 14:12 |
rgreening | which I am trying to break by coming here :) | 14:12 |
ScottK | geser: I just touched it for transition reasons. I know of no reason not to remove it. | 14:12 |
ScottK | rgreening: Fair enough. | 14:13 |
directhex | i'm sleepy. falling asleep at my desk! zzzzzzzzzz | 14:13 |
rgreening | well, I remembered the maintainer field ScottK heh | 14:13 |
ScottK | rgreening: Also we don't put the maintainer change in debian/changelog. It's actually Ubuntu Policy done to all packages, so no need to mention it. | 14:13 |
ScottK | Yes, excessively. | 14:14 |
directhex | update-maintainer! | 14:14 |
rgreening | oh... new command for me | 14:14 |
directhex | there we go, my sole reason for contributing to debian & syncing is becaise i suck at running update-maintainer so this way causes less admonishment from sponsors | 14:14 |
* Laney fluffles directhex | 14:15 | |
Laney | lots of lib syncs I see | 14:15 |
ScottK | rgreening: Also ~ppa1 in the revision ... | 14:15 |
rgreening | of course, I was testing it local. | 14:15 |
directhex | Laney, yes, slomo went nuts this morning, and meebey did a few last night | 14:15 |
Laney | \o/ | 14:15 |
rgreening | was going to change in the bug | 14:15 |
directhex | Laney, one or two more i can file once the mirror push is done | 14:15 |
rgreening | too quick sending debdiff | 14:16 |
rgreening | ScottK: let me redo the deb dif... | 14:16 |
ScottK | rgreening: No need. I've been editing as I go along and all this stuff is minor. | 14:16 |
rgreening | patch is missing something | 14:16 |
rgreening | 1 sec | 14:17 |
rgreening | maybe... | 14:17 |
rgreening | nm. | 14:17 |
rgreening | Im still asleep | 14:17 |
rgreening | its all good | 14:18 |
rgreening | ScottK: i'm still sending a proper diff... to ensure I got it corrected. Call it lerning by doing it over. | 14:21 |
ScottK | rgreening: OK. I'll look at it, but I'm already test building. | 14:21 |
rgreening | ScottK: http://paste.ubuntu.com/126284/ | 14:22 |
rgreening | think I got it all this time | 14:22 |
ScottK | I think so. | 14:24 |
ScottK | rgreening: Next question: Does this go back to Debian? | 14:24 |
rgreening | I think it's fairly innocous | 14:24 |
rgreening | so it surely can | 14:24 |
ScottK | Does Debian have Python 2.6 yet? | 14:26 |
rgreening | that, I do not know. | 14:26 |
ScottK | rgreening: Uploaded: Thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu. | 14:26 |
rgreening | yw. | 14:26 |
rgreening | one less python package to worry about | 14:26 |
ScottK | rgreening: rmadison -u debian python2.6 is an easy way to find out. | 14:27 |
goshawk | RainCT: done | 14:27 |
rgreening | I'll try another one in a bit. I assume there are sill some available to work on. | 14:27 |
rgreening | ok | 14:27 |
rgreening | ty ScottK | 14:27 |
rgreening | hmm... rmadison doesn't appear to be reporting anything here ScottK. silently returns nothing. | 14:28 |
goshawk | RainCT: and gdebi is not good in pbuilder, it carries on a lot of libgtk stuff and can make the pbuilder image dirty... | 14:28 |
ScottK | rgreening: Great. What I'd do with this is file it as a wishlist bug in Debian BTS and caveat the bug as ... when you get 2.6..... | 14:28 |
rgreening | ok | 14:29 |
ScottK | rgreening: I'd just send the patch, not the patch system stuff. | 14:29 |
rgreening | good enough | 14:29 |
rgreening | rmadison doesnt seem to work | 14:29 |
rgreening | 4 me | 14:29 |
ScottK | It looks like they Debian maintainer is also upstream, so I expect they'll just do a new release or something | 14:29 |
ScottK | rmadison for Ubuntu is extremely slow. | 14:29 |
rgreening | it just returns immediately with nothing | 14:29 |
ScottK | In the case of Debian for python2.6 that's correct as they don't have it. | 14:31 |
ScottK | Try it with 2.5 | 14:31 |
maxb | Why is Ubuntu's rmadison so slow? Is it just that people.ubuntu.com is overloaded? | 14:31 |
rgreening | ScottK: ah | 14:31 |
ScottK | maxb: Because it integrates with Launchpad I believe. | 14:31 |
maxb | hmm | 14:31 |
rgreening | ScottK: that works better | 14:32 |
jpds | ScottK: It uses a mirror of the archive at people.u.c | 14:32 |
ScottK | jpds: OK. Then maybe maxb is right. | 14:32 |
ScottK | It is painful, so if someone could figure a faster way .... | 14:32 |
* maxb wonders how easy it would be to set up an external rmadison driven off the Packages/Sources files | 14:32 | |
jpds | http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/madison.cgi | 14:32 |
POX_ | ScottK: FYI: python2.6 has the same maintainer in Ubuntu and Debian | 14:34 |
ScottK | POX_: Yes, I'm aware. I'm guessing he's just waiting for some transition to clear or something for Debian. | 14:35 |
* POX_ wonders why the python2.6 transition is not made by Debian guys as clearly they have more manpower | 14:36 | |
* ScottK doesn't wonder. | 14:37 | |
* ScottK just fixes .... | 14:37 | |
geser | POX_: more manpower doesn't imply that Debian moves faster than Ubuntu | 14:37 |
POX_ | isn't syncing easier? | 14:37 |
POX_ | geser: yeah, python2.5 transition was made faster than in Ubuntu (no, packages with broken memory allocation doesn't count :P) | 14:38 |
geser | POX_: usually syncing is easier, but due to FF we might need to patch them anyway | 14:38 |
bddebian | Heya gang | 14:47 |
sistpoty|work | hi bddebian | 14:47 |
bddebian | Hi sistpoty|work | 14:47 |
mok0 | POX_: Debian guys are busy fighting over python-central | 14:51 |
POX_ | mok0: no, we're not. python-support will be used, I'll make sure of it | 14:55 |
POX_ | read debian-python logs, nobody else wants python-central, even doko isn't complaining | 14:56 |
geser | Hi bddebian | 14:56 |
doko | POX_: ? | 14:56 |
mok0 | POX_: kk | 14:56 |
mok0 | POX_: ah :-) | 14:56 |
POX_ | doko: you didn't reply on debian-python@l.d.o | 14:56 |
doko | POX_: be assured, I will. to your posting as well | 14:57 |
POX_ | it's too late :-( | 14:57 |
ScottK | Depends on for what. If he's got more good issues, then either you need to make Joss fix them or go back and reconsider. | 14:58 |
POX_ | it's always ok to report bugs, of course | 14:59 |
bddebian | Heya geser | 15:02 |
quadrispro | fabrice_sp__: i'm working on the tellico merge | 15:19 |
quadrispro | fabrice_sp__: I think it couldn't be a good idea drop khelpcenter from Recommends field, I would prefer replace it with khelpcenter4 | 15:21 |
quadrispro | what do you think about this? | 15:21 |
=== cw]n]HYr is now known as LjL | ||
quadrispro | fabrice_sp__: package builds fine, let me know what you think about the point above, going away for some minutes | 15:39 |
rgreening | Scottk: submitted bug to debian for balder2d | 15:44 |
ScottK | Great. | 15:44 |
=== cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
cristi | hey again! so, i registered in launchpad, i read the packaging guide and tried the hello example. what should i do next in order to be able to contribute to ubuntu with packages? | 16:00 |
savvas | er... I think the translations /usr/share/locale are missing from gdebi-core | 16:05 |
DktrKranz | ScottK, sistpoty|work, nhandler: MC asked for motu-release charter to be published. Preliminary draft was here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/MotuReleaseCharter, could we arrange to make a final version soon? | 16:05 |
ScottK | Without actually admitting that MC has such authority to demand it, I don't see why not. | 16:05 |
ara | cristi: you could have a look to the bugs listed as bitesize (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=bitesize). These are sometime easy to fix | 16:06 |
savvas | cristi: try providing debdiff patches to bitesize (easy) bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=bitesize | 16:06 |
savvas | darn :P | 16:06 |
sistpoty|work | DktrKranz: looks good to me | 16:06 |
cristi | ara, savvas thank you, i'll give it a look | 16:07 |
savvas | Is the default locale dir /usr/share/locale or /usr/share/locale-langpack ? | 16:15 |
savvas | ScottK: do you happen to know? ^ | 16:17 |
huats | geser: hey | 16:19 |
huats | I am taking care finally of the python-webkit update | 16:19 |
huats | and thus I will deal with the 2.6 transition needed | 16:19 |
ScottK | savvas: No. | 16:20 |
savvas | ok, thanks | 16:21 |
savvas | I guess I should figure out a way to provide it for both in the program | 16:22 |
savvas | probably /usr/share/locale is for the application and /usr/share/locale-langpack for the language packs | 16:23 |
jdong | groan why do USB optical mice need to go into power saving mode and dim the optical circuitry? | 16:34 |
jdong | it's not like that 5V/100mA LED is an atrocious waste of power and worthy of mouse lag on idle... | 16:34 |
cristi | uhm, is this ok in the packaging guide? cp hello-2.1.1.tar.gz hello_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz there is no hello-2.1.1.tar.gz, but only the .orig | 16:35 |
cristi | what should i do copy the .orig ? is this what was meant? | 16:35 |
jdong | if you already have the orig then you are okay | 16:36 |
jdong | all that step says is that your orig should be named like hello_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz | 16:36 |
jdong | the underscore before the version, .orig. before the tar.gz | 16:36 |
cristi | jdong ah ok, thanks | 16:36 |
cristi | how deep should my c++ knowledge be in order to fix bugs or make packages? | 16:52 |
ScottK | cristi: None is sufficient. | 16:53 |
ScottK | From a programming perspective if you have a bit of shell, that's enough. | 16:53 |
ScottK | It's often useful if you do have more, but there's plenty to do if you don't. | 16:53 |
cristi | ScottK can you give an example of such a bug that doesn't require cpp ? | 16:54 |
ScottK | Currently we're going through a Python transition. So we need to update a bunch of packages. | 16:55 |
ScottK | Virtually none of those (and it's a lot of packages) need any programming. | 16:55 |
ScottK | I did 4 today that just needed a recompile test and a no-change upload to build in the new environment. | 16:56 |
cristi | ScottK i see | 16:56 |
ScottK | Some of them need changes in their debian/rules or in postinsts scripts. | 16:56 |
RainCT | niiice, geany now has highlighting for debian/rules :) | 17:27 |
mok0 | RainCT: emacs has highlighting for debian/control :-P | 17:38 |
* RainCT will write a patch for that :P | 17:39 | |
=== erhesrhsrtb54vyh is now known as Elbrus | ||
hggdh | could a MOTU please tell me what is wrong on http://revu.ubuntuwire.org/p/libpst (lintian warning)? | 17:45 |
mok0 | hggdh: it doesn't look like anything's wrong | 17:46 |
hggdh | mok0, why the warning, then? | 17:46 |
mok0 | hggdh: what warning? | 17:46 |
mok0 | hggdh: pastebin it | 17:46 |
hggdh | mok0, http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/libpst-0902260309/lintian | 17:47 |
mok0 | hggdh: that's ok, original-maintainer is an ubuntu-specific field that lintian doesn't know about | 17:49 |
hggdh | mok0, thanks | 17:49 |
geser | but the version is wrong | 17:50 |
eMerzh | if some motu want to review my package at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=sqliteman | 17:50 |
hggdh | geser, ? | 17:50 |
geser | hggdh: it should be 0.6.27-0ubuntu1 instead of only -1 (that's reserved for Debian) | 17:51 |
hggdh | geser, thanks, will correct | 17:52 |
hggdh | ah, if I add an Ubuntu extension to the version, lintian does not complain anymore about original-maintainer in .dsc | 17:54 |
=== cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
RainCT | Is someone around who hasn't debootstrap intalled? | 18:03 |
maxb | I'm sitting at a usb-creator intrepid installation upgraded to jaunty, if that helps | 18:05 |
RainCT | maxb: Does dpkg -l | grep debootstrap return something? | 18:06 |
maxb | uhm, I'm quite likely to have installed it manually | 18:07 |
geser | RainCT: checked in a jaunty chroot: no output and the return value is 1 | 18:09 |
RainCT | geser: OK. Can you please check if directory /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/ exists? | 18:10 |
RainCT | I guess no, but just to be sure :) | 18:10 |
geser | RainCT: ls: cannot access /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/: No such file or directory | 18:11 |
RainCT | geser: great, thanks | 18:11 |
RainCT | ok, bug #334848 is fixed now :) | 18:13 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 334848 in ubuntu-dev-tools "[Jaunty] pbuilder-dist does not recognize any distributions at all" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/334848 | 18:13 |
Brucevdk | Question, I'm trying to upload a package to a PPA. I've already sent the orig.tar.gz and now it's complaining that I'm trying to send a new orig.tar.gz that is different from the one already uploaded (which was associated with a failed build). That's the point though, I don't actually want to change the version number or anything. Is it possible to delete the orig.tar.gz or work around this? | 18:33 |
Brucevdk | Maybe this belongs in #launchpad | 18:34 |
RainCT | Brucevdk: delete the package, wait some days and try uploading it again | 18:35 |
Brucevdk | RainCT: days :'( | 18:35 |
RainCT | Brucevdk: not sure if you have to wait that much or it'll work right away | 18:36 |
Brucevdk | RainCT: well, I'll do this, but if there are any other options I wouldn't mind hearing about them ;-) | 18:36 |
=== fabrice_sp__ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
Laibsch | RainCT: Thanks a lot! | 18:51 |
RainCT | Laibsch: no problem :) | 18:52 |
Laibsch | ScottK: Do you know of a simple way to find packages still depending on python < 2.6? | 18:54 |
Laibsch | I'm sure, there is some dpkg or apt magic to get such a list | 18:54 |
james_w | Laibsch: take a look at grep-dctrl | 18:55 |
ScottK | It's not simple, but grep-dctrl is the tool you want to weild. | 18:55 |
james_w | dctrl-tools is the package | 18:55 |
Laibsch | alright, I think I used it once or twice in the past | 18:55 |
Laibsch | I'll see about that python-4suite-xml package first | 18:56 |
james_w | "grep-dctrl -FDepends -sPackage "python (<< 2.6" < /var/lib/apt/lists/*source*" might do it | 18:56 |
Laibsch | It's the last one that is actually still bothering me | 18:56 |
Laibsch | personally | 18:56 |
ScottK | python-xml needs doing. | 18:56 |
Laibsch | The package I'm trying to fix calls setup.py twice in debian/rules | 19:05 |
Laibsch | Once for config | 19:05 |
Laibsch | Once for build | 19:05 |
Laibsch | Do I need to add "--install-layout=deb" to both calls? | 19:06 |
Laibsch | I assume it should be sufficient for "build" only | 19:06 |
Laibsch | Actually, setup.py is called much more often, when do I need to add the install-layout thing? | 19:08 |
ScottK | install | 19:09 |
Laibsch | ScottK: I assume, I should add it for install_html, too, though, right? | 19:10 |
ScottK | Probably not. You just want it when it's installing the python bits, but I'd build it and then check the resutls. | 19:10 |
=== mrooney1 is now known as mrooney | ||
Laibsch | yes | 19:16 |
Laibsch | the only problem is, the package took three hours to fail the build yesterday ;-) | 19:17 |
Brucevdk | I feel for you, Estimated build start: in 3 hours :'( | 19:18 |
Laibsch | oh | 19:19 |
Laibsch | that would be the results in only after 6 hours! | 19:19 |
Laibsch | actually, it says the build is only estimated to start in 4 hours here! | 19:20 |
quadrispro | fabrice_sp: I'm sponsoring your application, keep up the good work ;) | 19:32 |
bobbo | is there a list of packages that still need to be fixed for the Python 2.6 transition? | 19:32 |
quadrispro | bobbo: hi! | 19:32 |
bobbo | hey quadrispro :) | 19:33 |
quadrispro | bobbo: I remember you was coming in Italy some week ago | 19:34 |
Laibsch | bobbo: python-xml was mentioned here | 19:35 |
Laibsch | I'm also working to get such a list from dpkg-ctrl | 19:35 |
superm1 | Laibsch, i'm looking at it right now | 19:35 |
Laibsch | I failed so far | 19:35 |
superm1 | Laibsch, i think i might have it under control | 19:35 |
Laibsch | superm1: cool, thanks | 19:35 |
superm1 | Laibsch, actually it looks like i was beat | 19:38 |
superm1 | RainCT, got it | 19:38 |
superm1 | thanks RainCT :) | 19:38 |
ScottK | That should unblock quite a number of things. | 19:39 |
superm1 | ScottK, not fully - only in terms of apt letting them through. see my mail to ubuntu-devel ML. all packages using python-xml are still going to be broke. | 19:40 |
ScottK | Right. Forgot about that. | 19:40 |
ScottK | superm1: I suspect doko would advise switching to a different/not deprecated XML library. | 19:41 |
superm1 | ScottK, well can't force upstreams to do that necessarily | 19:42 |
Laibsch | if anybody with a bit of RAM in their build machine feels like trying to build https://launchpad.net/%7Er0lf/+archive/ppa/+files/python-4suite_1.0.2-7ubuntu1.dsc I'd appreciate it | 19:42 |
ScottK | True, but in many cases we can patch our way around it. | 19:42 |
Laibsch | the PPA will take another couple of hours to start | 19:42 |
superm1 | ScottK, is there anything that's close to API compatible with PyXML in the first place? | 19:43 |
ScottK | superm1: It depends on what part of pyxml you're using. Some bits are in Python itself, others can be found in other packages, some bits are unique to pyxml | 19:44 |
ScottK | We tried, and failed once to push it all the way out of the archive. | 19:44 |
fabrice_sp | quadrispro, thanks ;-) | 19:44 |
superm1 | ScottK, looks like xml.dom, xpath, htmllib | 19:44 |
ScottK | It was a while ago I looked at these, so I don't recall.... | 19:45 |
superm1 | and there's some comments that "The Python SGML based HTML parser is unusable (it finds tag starts/ends in the worst way possible" in the code, so not too reassuring | 19:45 |
Zarel | Hi, everyone. The warzone2100 package in the intrepid repositories is very out of date - it's 2.1.0-beta4, and 2.1.1 has already been released. Since this is beta -> stable, nearly all the changes have been [important] bugfixes, so is there any chance someone could go and update it? | 19:59 |
Zarel | -> http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/warzone2100 | 19:59 |
fabrice_sp | Zarel, before being able to have it in Intrepid, we need to have it in Jaunty. Actual version for Jaunty is 2.1.0-1... | 20:11 |
Zarel | fabrice_sp: Can we at least get 2.1.0-1 into Intrepid, then? | 20:12 |
fabrice_sp | we are in Feature Freeze, so we need a good reason to upgrade it :-) | 20:13 |
Zarel | fabrice_sp: It's a bugfix release, no new features? | 20:13 |
Zarel | Is that a good enough reason? | 20:13 |
Zarel | Also, it's stable rather than beta. | 20:13 |
fabrice_sp | Zarel, yeah, but in this case, you have to compare the version that we will have in Jaunty and the latest one, so its stable with stable | 20:14 |
fabrice_sp | I also have to check if no new features are there | 20:14 |
Zarel | What do you mean by "compare the version"? | 20:15 |
fabrice_sp | it seems to be a fix only release, you're right | 20:15 |
fabrice_sp | so I'll try to compile the version in Debian, and if it works, I'll fill a sync request | 20:16 |
Zarel | Thanks. | 20:16 |
fabrice_sp | Zarel, do you volunteer to test it? | 20:17 |
fabrice_sp | :-D | 20:17 |
Zarel | Define "test" | 20:17 |
fabrice_sp | install the version I will put in my ppa, and check it's working fine | 20:18 |
* fabrice_sp builds warzone2100 2.1.1-1 | 20:19 | |
Zarel | I only have three installs of Ubuntu - one of them I don't have package installation permissions, and the other two are VMs which aren't fast enough to run Warzone. Sorry. :/ | 20:19 |
Zarel | I can verify that sound apparently doesn't work on a default install of Warzone in Ubuntu. We've gotten lots of bug reports about that. :P | 20:20 |
fabrice_sp | You're upstream? | 20:21 |
Zarel | Depends on your definition of "upstream". For most definitions, I'd say yes. | 20:21 |
fabrice_sp | k. Nice game by the way! | 20:22 |
Zarel | Thanks. | 20:22 |
fabrice_sp | it builds fine. I'll fill the sync request | 20:24 |
directhex | isn't warzone an old strategy game from the 90s? or am i misremembering | 20:25 |
Zarel | directhex: 1999, to be exact. | 20:25 |
Zarel | It was open-sourced in 2004. | 20:25 |
directhex | oh, neato | 20:26 |
fabrice_sp | directhex, if you're interested in sponsoring the sync, I'll give you the bug number as soon as it appears ;-) | 20:30 |
directhex | fabrice_sp, i'm not a motu | 20:30 |
fabrice_sp | just in case some MOTU or U-C-D is interested in warzone2100: bug #337915 | 20:32 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 337915 in warzone2100 "Sync warzone2100 2.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/337915 | 20:32 |
Zarel | Eheh, 2.1.1 isn't that big of a deal - it only had one bugfix from 2.1.0, and that was only for Macs. | 20:35 |
fabrice_sp | Zarel, yes. It seems to be quite stable ;-) | 20:36 |
* fabrice_sp installing version 2.1.1 | 20:36 | |
fabrice_sp | working fine, even with sounds ;-) | 20:41 |
Zarel | :D | 20:42 |
Zarel | Good sign. | 20:42 |
fabrice_sp | yep :-) | 20:42 |
_16aR_ | Hello | 20:45 |
fabrice_sp | hello _16aR_ | 20:45 |
_16aR_ | When we compile for amd64, does the CFLAGS enables old i686 function like MMX, etc ? | 20:45 |
_16aR_ | or we must enable them into the debian/rules ? | 20:45 |
RainCT | fabrice_sp: sync request ack'd | 20:46 |
_16aR_ | by the way, how can we help for package stabilisation in jaunty ? | 20:46 |
fabrice_sp | thanks RainCT ;-) | 20:46 |
RainCT | No problem. I'm off now, see you tomorrow :) | 20:47 |
fabrice_sp | CU! bye | 20:47 |
fabrice_sp | _16aR_, you can check http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ | 20:47 |
fabrice_sp | and check rcbugs, for example | 20:48 |
_16aR_ | ok fabrice_sp, thanks | 20:49 |
fabrice_sp | you're welcome ;-) | 20:50 |
quentusrex | Hello | 21:25 |
quentusrex | Anyone here use kvm? | 21:25 |
quentusrex | or libvirt? | 21:26 |
directhex | a little | 21:30 |
jpds | quentusrex: Might want to try #ubuntu-virt too. :) | 21:44 |
quentusrex | jpds: I'm in there too :) | 21:44 |
quentusrex | directhex: would you be interested in helping to backport libvirt 6.1 to intrepid? | 21:45 |
quentusrex | or even to hardy? | 21:45 |
directhex | quentusrex, i can test on intrepid, but not hardy. and i have too much on my plate to help do it | 21:45 |
quentusrex | yeah, I can test on intrepid as well | 21:46 |
quentusrex | I'm not too skilled on how to package for ubuntu yet... | 21:46 |
Amaranth | cody-somerville: how does one get to talk in #xfce-dev? | 21:47 |
khashayar | Hey folks, does anyone here have a couple of minutes to review pencil (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=pencil)? We really need it for ubuntu studio (we're going to file exceptions). | 22:04 |
cody-somerville | Amaranth, like that | 22:09 |
TheMuso | c | 22:20 |
ripps | Is it possible to modify functions in a debian/rules file that's been inherited from a include? | 22:45 |
ripps | I'm trying to add dpatch support, but the file is practically only includes from cdbs. | 22:46 |
ScottK | There's a cdbs rule for dpatch you can use. | 22:46 |
ScottK | Don't try and add it by hand. | 22:47 |
ripps | okay, thanks | 22:47 |
POX_ | doko: make sure you don't have "/local" somewhere in distutils.cfg (another user complained about it) | 23:08 |
orci | hi all, sorry again if wrong place but wiki.ubuntu.com is having problems | 23:08 |
ScottK | POX_: I had that once and it just needed the layout-deb magic added. | 23:13 |
ScottK | orci: This is the wrong place. I suspect #canonical-sysadmin. | 23:13 |
POX_ | /usr/local or /local? | 23:13 |
ScottK | Oh. | 23:14 |
ScottK | Nevermind. | 23:14 |
ScottK | /usr/local | 23:14 |
POX_ | maybe I misunderstood him, though | 23:14 |
* POX_ goes to bed | 23:14 | |
orci | ScottK-desktop, OK thanks | 23:14 |
=== rgreening_ is now known as rgreening | ||
mrooney | hello motu friends, what are we doing with bugs resulting from the python 2.6 upgrade such as bug #338004, where python < 2.6 is required | 23:47 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 338004 in soya "soya requires python < 2.6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/338004 | 23:47 |
james_w | mrooney: ah, that's where we just haven't got to it yet | 23:52 |
james_w | there are people tracking those down and fixing them | 23:52 |
james_w | I thought you were referring to a bug about a package now working when run under python2.6 | 23:52 |
mrooney | james_w: ah so a package which explicitly requires << python 2.6 will be noticed, ones that don't declare that are the ones to announce? | 23:53 |
james_w | mrooney: yeah, in general | 23:54 |
james_w | we can search for the former | 23:54 |
james_w | the latter might be very subtle | 23:54 |
mrooney | james_w: right you couldn't automatically detect that except by running some tool to find common upgrade issues on all the python packages | 23:54 |
ajmitch | especially when the failures end up being in things like wxpython | 23:56 |
mrooney | ajmitch: oh, has that happened | 23:56 |
mrooney | I have a wxPython app in Jaunty | 23:56 |
ajmitch | things like that have happened, wxpython was just an example of a complicated steaming mess :) | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!